The present disclosure relates generally to communication systems, and more specifically to a method and apparatus for tuning a communication device.
Existing multi-frequency wireless devices (e.g., radios) use an antenna structure that attempts to radiate at optimum efficiency over the entire frequency range of operation, but can really only do so over a subset of the frequencies. Due to size constraints, and aesthetic design reasons, the antenna designer is forced to compromise the performance in some of the frequency bands. An example of such a wireless device could be a mobile telephone that operates over a range of different frequencies, such as 800 MHz to 2200 MHz. The antenna will not radiate efficiently at all frequencies due to the nature of the design, and the power transfer between the antenna, the power amplifier, and the receiver in the radio will vary significantly.
Additionally, an antenna's performance is impacted by its operating environment. For example, multiple use cases exist for radio handsets, which include such conditions as the placement of the handset's antenna next to a user's head, or in the user's pocket or the covering of an antenna with a hand, can significantly impair wireless device efficiency. Further, many existing radios use a simple circuit composed of fixed value components that are aimed at improving the power transfer from power amplifier to antenna, or from the antenna to the receiver, but since the components used are fixed in value there is always a compromise when attempting to cover multiple frequency bands and multiple use cases.
One or more of the exemplary embodiments described herein can have an antenna with a tunable element attached to the radiating elements of the antenna. The tunable element can be of various types, such as a Passive Tunable Integrated Circuit (PTIC) having one or more electrically tunable capacitors.
In one embodiment, the antenna can be directly tuned over frequency, moving the resonant frequency of the radiating element. By doing so, the magnitude of the VSWR that the antenna presents to the transceiver, can be adjusted, and can be kept within a range that is easier to match to the transceiver.
In another embodiment, on-antenna tuning can be combined with a tunable matching network such as positioned at a feed point of the antenna to achieve greater gains in total antenna efficiency as compared with utilizing either of these tuning methods separately.
In one embodiment, the tunable element on the antenna can be tuned using an open loop methodology, such as tuning it strictly as a function of the band/frequency that the transceiver is operating in. In another embodiment, other criteria can also be used in combination with, or in place of, the band/frequency information, including mechanical configuration (slide up/down) or other use cases, and other inputs, such as proximity detector status and accelerometer position information. The use cases can vary and can include speaker phone operation, flip open and so forth.
In another embodiment, the tunable element on the antenna can be tuned to place the RF voltage present at a measuring component in proximity to the antenna, such as a detector, within a preset range. The range can be determined based on knowledge of the power being transmitted by the handset's transceiver, and can be used to establish the input impedance of the antenna within a range of Voltage Standing Wave Ratio (VSWR) that would allow a tunable matching network, such as coupled at a feed point of the antenna, to improve the impedance match between the antenna and the transceiver. This embodiment can incorporate two separate “loops” of a closed loop algorithm, allowing the tunable element of the antenna to be tuned in a closed loop algorithm utilizing feedback from a detector, and once that loop settled, then the tunable matching network can be tuned using information from a directional coupler and the detector.
Another embodiment can utilize information from a detector and a directional coupler in a combined closed loop algorithm. The algorithm can simultaneously adjust the tunable element(s) on the antenna and the tunable matching network while also increasing the RF voltage detected at the detector subject to the constraints on return loss and other figure of merit parameters determined by the directional coupler inputs. One or more of such algorithms are described in U.S. application Ser. No. 11/940, 309 to Greene, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Another embodiment can utilize information obtained from a detector and/or a directional coupler using one or more of the methodologies described in U.S. application Ser. No. 13/005,122 to Greene, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference. The methodologies can include using the derivatives or slopes of the RF voltages at the detectors responsive to changes in the control signals to the tunable elements.
In yet another embodiment, detuning of a first antenna among a plurality of antennas can be performed in order to reduce coupling of the first antenna with one or more other antennas. The detuning of the first antenna can improve the performance of the one or more other antennas.
One embodiment of the present disclosure entails a tuning system for a communication device having an antenna, the tuning system includes at least one first tunable element connected with at least one radiating element of the antenna for tuning the antenna where the adjusting of the at least one first tunable element is based on at least one of a use case associated with the communication device and location information associated with the communication device, and a matching network having at least one second tunable element coupled at a feed point of the antenna, wherein the matching network receives control signals for adjusting the at least one second tunable element to tune the matching network.
One embodiment of the present disclosure entails a method including tuning an antenna of a communication device by adjusting at least one first tunable element of the communication device that is connected with at least one radiating element of the antenna where the adjusting of the at least one first tunable element is based on a use case associated with the communication device, and tuning a matching network of the communication device by adjusting at least one second tunable element of the matching network that is coupled between the antenna and a transceiver of the communication device, wherein the adjusting of the second tunable element is a closed loop process based on an operational parameter of the communication device.
One embodiment of the present disclosure entails a tuning system that includes a memory and a controller. The controller is programmed to receive antenna efficiency information associated with one or more antennas of a group of antennas of a communication device, receive antenna isolation information associated with one or more antennas of the group of antennas, and tune at least a portion of the group of antennas based on the antenna efficiency information and the antenna isolation information.
The exemplary embodiments can employ open loop tuning processes, such as at the on-antenna tunable element and/or at the matching network. The use cases can include a number of different states associated with the communication device, such as flip-open, flip-closed, slider-in, slider-out (e.g., Qwerty or numeric Keypad), speaker-phone on, speaker-phone off, hands-free operation, antenna up, antenna down, other communication modes on or off (e.g., Bluetooth/WiFi/GPS), particular frequency band, and/or transmit or receive mode. The use case can be based on object or surface proximity detection (e.g., a user's hand or a table). Other environmental effects can be included in the open loop process, such as temperature, pressure, velocity and/or altitude effects. The open loop process can take into account other information, such as associated with a particular location (e.g., in a building or in a city surrounded by buildings), as well as an indication of being out of range.
The exemplary embodiments can utilize combinations of open loop and closed loop processes, such as tuning a tunable element based on both a use case and a measured operating parameter (e.g., measured by a detector in proximity to the antenna and/or measured by a directional coupler between the matching network and the transceiver). In other examples, the tuning can utilize one process and then switch to another process, such as using closed loop tuning and then switching to open loop tuning based on particular factors associated with the communication device.
The UI 104 can include a depressible or touch-sensitive keypad 108 with a navigation mechanism such as a roller ball, joystick, mouse, or navigation disk for manipulating operations of the communication device 100. The keypad 108 can be an integral part of a housing assembly of the communication device 100 or an independent device operably coupled thereto by a tethered wireline interface (such as a flex cable) or a wireless interface supporting for example Bluetooth. The keypad 108 can represent a numeric dialing keypad commonly used by phones, and/or a Qwerty keypad with alphanumeric keys. The UI 104 can further include a display 110 such as monochrome or color LCD (Liquid Crystal Display), OLED (Organic Light Emitting Diode) or other suitable display technology for conveying images to an end user of the communication device 100. In an embodiment where the display 110 is a touch-sensitive display, a portion or all of the keypad 108 can be presented by way of the display.
The power supply 114 can utilize common power management technologies (such as replaceable batteries, supply regulation technologies, and charging system technologies) for supplying energy to the components of the communication device 100 to facilitate portable applications. The controller 106 can utilize computing technologies such as a microprocessor and/or digital signal processor (DSP) with associated storage memory such a Flash, ROM, RAM, SRAM, DRAM or other like technologies.
The communication device 100 can utilize an on-antenna tuning element 150, which can be directly connected with the radiating element(s), including high band (HB) and low band (LB) radiating elements and/or a portion of the radiating elements. Tuning elements can be a number of components in a number of different configurations, including variable capacitors such as electrically tunable capacitors, although other tunable elements are also contemplated by the present disclosure including a semiconductor varactor, a micro-electro-mechanical systems (MEMS) varactor, a MEMS switched reactive element, a piezoelectric component or a semiconductor switched reactive element.
The tunable capacitors 504-508 can each utilize technology that enables tunability of the capacitance of said component. One embodiment of the tunable capacitors 504-508 can utilize voltage or current tunable dielectric materials such as a composition of barium strontium titanate (BST). An illustration of a BST composition is the Parascan® Tunable Capacitor. In another embodiment, the tunable reactive element 310 can utilize semiconductor varactors. Other present or next generation methods or material compositions that can support a means for a voltage or current tunable reactive element are contemplated by the present disclosure.
The DC-to-DC converter 304 can receive a power signal such as 3 Volts from the power supply 114 of the communication device 100 in
In another embodiment, the tunable matching network 202 can comprise a control circuit 402 in the form of a decoder and a tunable reactive element 404 comprising switchable reactive elements such as shown in
The tunability of the tunable matching networks 202, 204 provides the controller 106 a means to optimize performance parameters of the transceiver 102 such as, for example, but not limited to, transmitter power, transmitter efficiency, receiver sensitivity, power consumption of the communication device, a specific absorption rate (SAR) of energy by a human body, frequency band performance parameters, and so on.
Various algorithms can be utilized for adjusting the matching network 750, some of which are disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2009/0121963 filed on Nov. 14, 2007 by Greene, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein. The Greene Application describes several methods utilizing Figures of Merit, which in this exemplary embodiment can be determined in whole or in part from measurements of the forward and reverse signals present at detector 701. This exemplary embodiment can also utilize detector 702 to further improve the ability of the tuning system to enable improved performance of the communication device. One embodiment of the algorithm can utilize the inputs from detector 701 to establish a maximum return loss or VSWR for the matching network. This method can establish a range of impedances around the targeted impedance. This range of impedances may establish an acceptable level of performance. Input from detector 702 can then be utilized to allow the algorithm to find an improved or best impedance within that acceptable range. For instance, the algorithm could continue to modify the matching network 775 in order to increase the RF voltage detected at the antenna feed, while constraining the return loss (measured by detector 701) to stay within the target return loss. In this embodiment, communication device 700 can allow tuning for source impedances that are not 50 ohms. Additionally detector 702 allows the algorithm to minimize the insertion loss of the tunable match 775.
In another embodiment, the tuning algorithm can maintain the return loss while minimizing the current drain to determine desired tuning values. The tuning algorithm can utilize various parameters for tuning the device, including output power of the transmitter, return loss, received power, current drain and/or transmitter linearity.
Communication device 700 can include one or more radiating elements 755 of the antenna 750. One or more tunable elements 780 can be connected directly with one or more of the radiating elements 755 to allow for tuning of the antenna 750 in conjunction with tuning of the matching network 775. The tunable elements 780 can be of various types as described herein, including electrically tunable capacitors. The number and configuration of the tunable elements 780 can be varied based on a number of factors, including whether the tuning is an open loop or a closed loop process. In one embodiment, all of the radiating elements 755 have at least one tunable element 780 connected thereto to allow for tuning of the radiating element. In another embodiment, only a portion of the radiating elements 755 have a tunable element 780 connected thereto.
In another exemplary embodiment,
In one embodiment, the antennas of communication device 800 can be part of a MIMO (multiple-input and multiple output) system. The multiple antennas can be utilized for improving communications, such as through switching or selecting techniques, including analyzing noise in the multiple signals and selecting the most appropriate signal. The multiple antennas can also be used with combining techniques where the signals can be added together, such as equal gain combining or maximal-ratio combining. Other techniques for utilizing multiple signals from multiple antennas are also contemplated by the exemplary embodiments, including dynamic systems that can adjust the particular techniques being utilized, such as selectively applying a switching technique and a combination technique. The particular position(s) of the antenna(s) can vary and can be selected based on a number of factors, including being in close enough proximity to couple RF energy with each other.
Communication device 800 can include a number of other components such as tunable matching networks which can include or otherwise be coupled with a number of components such as directional couplers, sensor ICs, bias control and other control ICs and tunable matching networks. The tunable matching networks can include various other components in addition to, or in place of the components shown, including components described above with respect to
In one embodiment, a first tunable matching network 810 can be coupled at the input to the transmit/receive antenna 805 and a second tunable matching network 825 can be coupled to the input to the diversity reception antenna 820. Both of these matching networks 810 and 825 can be adjusted (e.g., tuned) to improve performance of the communication device 800 in response to changes in bands, frequencies of operation, physical use cases and/or proximity of the antennas 805 and 820 to the user or other objects which can affect the impedances presented by the antennas to the Front End Module (FEM) 860 and transceiver 850. In one embodiment, the feedback line could be removed, such as by using the FEM to route these signals appropriately to perform these measurements (e.g., avoiding filtering out the signals).
Tunable matching network 810 can be adjusted using different methods and/or components, some of which were disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2009/0121963. In one embodiment, a detector 830 can be coupled to the device 800 so as to detect RF voltage present at the connection to the diversity reception antenna 820. Received power levels at this point may be below −50 dBm. Some detectors, such as a diode detector or a logarithmic amplifier, may not typically be adequate to detect such levels. However, since in this exemplary embodiment, the two antennas 805 and 820 are in the same device 800 and in proximity to each other, they can inherently couple RF energy from one antenna to the other. While the communication device 800 does not require this coupling, its presence can be utilized by the exemplary embodiments for the purposes of tuning the antenna matching networks. In one example, after establishing the tuning state for the diversity match at the transmit frequency, a predetermined relationship or offset can be applied to the matching network 825 in order to adjust the match to the receiver operating frequency.
In one embodiment, the tunable match on the transmit/receive antenna 805 can be tuned similar to the technique described above with respect to
In another embodiment, after tunable matching network 810 is adjusted by the algorithm, tunable matching network 825 can also be adjusted. By measuring the coupled transmitted power present at detector 830, the tunable matching network 825 can be adjusted to increase coupled transmitter power seen at detector 830. In one example, after establishing the tuning state for the diversity match at the transmit frequency, a predetermined relationship or offset can be applied to the matching network 825 in order to adjust the match to the receiver operating frequency. For instance, the tuning circuits can be adjusted initially based on transmitter oriented metrics and then a predetermined relationship or offset can be applied to attain a desired tuning state for both transmitter and receiver operation. In another embodiment, the operational metric can be one or more of transmitter reflection loss, output power of the transmitter, current drain and/or transmitter linearity.
For example, in a time division multiplexed (TDM) system in which the transmitter and the receiver operate at different frequencies but only operate in their respective time slots (i.e., transmit time slot and receive time slot), this can be accomplished by identifying an optimal tuning for the transmitter and then adding an empirically derived adjustment to the tuning circuits in receive mode. As another example, in a frequency division multiplexed (FDM) system in which the transmitter and receiver operate simultaneously and at different frequencies, this can be accomplished by identifying a target operation for the transmitter, and then adjusting the tuning circuits first to the target value for the transmitter and then adjusting the values to approach a compromised value proximate to an equal or desired target value for the receiver. In one embodiment, a predetermined relationship, (e.g., an offset, scaling factor, translation or other change or modification) can be applied to the adjustments of the variable components when switching from the transmit mode to the receive mode. This translation can be a function of the values obtained while adjusting during the transmit time slot. The translation can then be removed upon return to the transmitter mode and the adjustment process is resumed. In one embodiment, because any frequency offset between the transmit signal and the receive signal is known, an adjustment or modification of the setting of the matching network in the form of a translation or some other function can be applied to the matching network during the receive time slot. In another embodiment, the adjustment can be performed in multiple steps if the transmission and reception frequencies are far apart.
In another embodiment, a Figure of Merit can be utilized that not only incorporates the transmit metrics, but also incorporates an element to attain a compromise between optimal transmitter and optimal receiver operation. This can be accomplished by identifying a target operation goal, such as a desired transmitter and receiver reflection loss and then identifying an operational setting that is a close compromise between the two. This embodiment thus can incorporate not only transmitter metrics but also tuning circuit settings or preferences into the algorithm. The tuning preferences can be empirically identified to ensure the desired operation.
In one embodiment where the communication device 800 employs antenna diversity for receive operation but does not employ antenna diversity for transmit operation, antenna 820 would be receive only. The transceiver can transmit on antenna 805 and can receive on both antennas 805 and 820. For adaptive closed loop tuning of the tunable matching network 825 on the diversity antenna, the communication device 800 can obtain a metric indicating the performance of the tunable matching circuit at the receive frequency. The metric can be used to tune the match to adjust the performance at the receive frequency. This can be done by measuring the level of the received signal using the receiver in the transceiver IC. This measurement is known as RSSI, received signal strength indicator. An RSSI measurement can be very noisy and unstable due to highly variable impairments in the propagation channel, such as fading. These variations can be filtered using averaging. However, the amount of averaging necessary could make such a measurement prohibitively slow and not suitable as feedback for closed loop antenna tuning.
In this embodiment, the transmit signal is moderately coupled to the tunable match in the diversity path because the main antenna and the diversity antenna are located on the same communications device. The main antenna and the diversity antenna may only have 20 dB isolation in many cases. The transmit signal present at tunable match 825 may be a much stronger and more stable signal than the receive signal present at tunable matching network 825. The transmit signal can be used to make reliable measurements that can be used for closed loop tuning.
The transmit signal can be measured using detector 830. The detector can be placed between the tunable match and the transceiver. This is effectively the output of the tunable match. A directional coupler is not necessary for this measurement in this embodiment, and capacitive or resistive coupling may be used, as long as the detector has sufficient dynamic range. Other components and configurations of the components can also be utilized for the parameter detection, such as shown in U.S. Patent Publication No. 20090039976 by McKinzie, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
In this embodiment, maximizing the output voltage of a tunable match can be the equivalent to minimizing insertion loss, and for a lossless network it can be equivalent to minimizing mismatch loss. An alternative to using detector 830 is to use the receiver itself (tuned to the transmit frequency) to measure the transmit signal. These are a few viable methods for measuring the transmit signal through the diversity tunable match. Other forms of signal detection are contemplated by the present disclosure.
A complication with using the transmit signal for tuning can be that it is at a different frequency than the receive signal and the objective of the tunable match in the diversity path is to adjust performance at the receive frequency. In one exemplary method, the tunable matching circuit is adjusted for reception performance based on transmission measurements. In this exemplary method, a tunable match can be optimized at the transmit frequency using measurements on the transmit signal and then the matching circuit can be adjusted using a predetermined relationship between the transmit settings and the receive settings to provide the desired performance at the receive frequency.
In one embodiment that utilizes a tunable matching network which contains two tunable capacitors, one set of tuning values, designated (C1TX, C2TX), can be applied only during the measurement of the transmit signal. The other set of tuning values, designated (C1RX, C2RX), can be applied in between the transmit slots, or just during the receive time slots allowing for alternate tuning during a slot which may be used to monitor other base stations or other networks. This embodiment describes two tunable capacitors, but this exemplary embodiment can apply to various numbers and types of tunable elements. In this embodiment, the Rx tuning values are a function of the Tx tuning values. As the Tx values adaptively change throughout the iterative algorithm, the Rx values will also change, tracking the Tx values with a predetermined relationship. If the figure of merit is set to maximize Vout, the Tx solution can converge at (C1TXopt, C2TXopt), and can be appropriately adjusted using the predetermined relationship to (C1RXopt, C2RXopt) to achieve the desired RX performance.
Each time the tunable match is set to (C1TX, C2TX) in order to perform a Tx measurement, the performance at the Rx frequency may be degraded during the time that (C1TX, C2TX) is applied. It is desirable in this embodiment to perform the measurement as quickly as possible to minimize the Rx degradation caused by Tx tuning during the measurement. In one embodiment, the Tx values can be applied for less than one percent of the time while still achieving adequate convergence time.
In one embodiment, the relationship between the TX and RX tuning solutions can be dependent upon the bands of operation, and in the case where the receiver is tuned to monitor signals in an alternate band, then an alternate tuning solution (C1RX2, C2RX2) can be applied during that measurement.
Another exemplary method for controlling the tuning can be employed, which does not require setting the tunable capacitors to values optimized for transmission while performing the Tx measurement. The objective is to operate the tuning matching network at settings that optimize Rx performance These settings are at capacitance values that are a specific amount away from the Tx optimum in a specific direction. An algorithm can be utilized that will find this location in the capacitance plane without first needing to find the Tx optimum. The Tx level can change based on a number of circumstances, such as from power control commands in the transceiver or from variations in supply voltage, temperature, component tolerances, and so forth. In this embodiment, since only measurement of the output RF voltage of the tuner is being performed, a determination may not be made as to whether the algorithm is at the Tx optimum or a specific amount away from the Tx optimum because the Tx level is changing. This may prevent the use of an algorithm that simply targets a specific Tx signal level.
A metric that can be useful in determining where the tuning matching network is operating relative to the Tx optimum is to utilize the slope, or derivative of the Tx level with respect to the value or setting of the tunable capacitors (or other types of tunable elements). If the RF voltage (Vout) present at the output of the tunable match at the TX frequency is determined, such as through use of a log detector, then the first derivatives are dVout/dC1 and dVout/dC2. These derivatives can be calculated using the finite difference of two sequential measurements. These slopes will be a function of the tunable capacitors. These slopes will not be a function of the absolute power level of the Tx signal since a log detector is being utilized. If a log detector or its equivalent is not utilized, the logarithm of the Tx voltage can be calculated prior to calculating the slope. By defining a Figure of Merit that includes dVout/dC1 and dVout/dC2, the algorithm can converge to a solution that is a specific amount away from the Tx optimum in a specific direction, in this case near the Rx optimum. In this embodiment, a log detector is a device having a logarithmic response.
In some cases, specifying the slopes alone will not result in a unique solution (i.e., there may be multiple solutions). The algorithm can resolve this situation by adding a PTC preference to the Figure of Merit. A tunable match may have many solutions that meet a Tx RL goal and a PTC preference can be included in the Figure of Merit to identify a solution that not only meets the Tx RL goal but also meets an Rx performance goal. Similarly, a tunable match may have many solutions that meet a slope criteria and a PTC preference can be included in the Figure of Merit to identify a solution that not only meets the slope criteria but also meets an Rx performance goal.
In cases where using dVout alone results in multiple solutions, it is also possible to use the second derivative to resolve these cases. For example, second derivatives (d2Vout/dC2dC1) can be utilized, which is dVout/dC2 differentiated with respect to C1. Specifying dVout/dC2 and d2Vout/dC2dC1 can identify the correct or desired Rx solution from the multiple solutions. This exemplary method can include determining derivative information (e.g., one or more of a first derivative, and/or a second derivative, and/or etc.) associated with the RF voltage based on derivatives of the RF voltage and the variable capacitance values, and tuning the tunable matching network using the derivative information.
Another exemplary embodiment can use detector 830 of the communication device 800 in the diversity path as feedback to adjust tunable matching network 810 on the main antenna 805. The tunable matching network 810 coupled with the main antenna has both transmit and receive signals, and can be optimized for Tx performance, Rx performance, and Duplex performance. For the Tx solution, Vout can be maximized. For the Rx solution and the Duplex solution, dVout can be included in the Figure of Merit. A PTC preference may be required to identify the optimal Rx solution but is not required to identify the optimal duplex solution, return loss, received power, current drain or transmitter linearity
In one or more exemplary embodiments, the Figure of Merit may be constructed such that when it equals a certain value, or is minimized or maximized, the desired tuner settings are achieved. The Figure of Merit may be used with a number of different optimization algorithms. For example, a more exhaustive approach may be used that evaluates the Figure of Merit at every combination of capacitor values. Other suitable algorithms can also be utilized, including a simplex algorithm, a binary search algorithm, and/or a gradient algorithm.
In another embodiment, communication device 800 can tune antennas 805 and 820 without using detectors 815 and 830. The tunable matching network 810 can be adjusted using several different methods, some of which were disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Publication US 2009/0121963. After the tunable matching network 810 is adjusted, the tunable matching network 825 can be adjusted. By monitoring the detector 801 coupled to the directional coupler 875, the diversity match tuning state can be determined which adjusts the tunable matching network 825 to the transmit frequency. If significant coupling between the two antennas 805 and 820 is assumed, and by monitoring the return loss of the transmit/receive match while adjusting the diversity reception antenna 820 match during transmitting, the diversity match tuning state can be determined which tunes the diversity reception antenna 820 to the transmit frequency. This tuning state can minimize the return loss at the transmit frequency as measured at the directional coupler 875. After finding this tuning state the tunable matching network 825 can then be adjusted (e.g., offset) appropriately for the receive frequency.
In another embodiment depicted in
Tunable element 902 can be adjusted in an open-loop manner to maximize rejection or attenuation at an unwanted frequency while maintaining the VSWR at the fundamental frequency in the range that can be reasonably matched by the tunable matching network 908. The unwanted frequency may be a harmonic or an interferer. Matching network 908 can be tuned in a closed-loop manner, such as based on operational parameter(s) collected from detector 903 and/or directional coupler 905 having forward and reverse detectors 906, 907 positioned between the matching network 908 and the transceiver 909.
In another embodiment depicted in
In another embodiment depicted in
In another embodiment depicted in
In another embodiment depicted in
In another embodiment depicted in
In another embodiment depicted in
In another embodiment depicted in
Another embodiment provides for tuning one or more of the antennas of a communication device. In a multiple antenna system, simply maximizing the over the air efficiency of all the antennas may not accomplish the best overall performance of the communication system. The isolation or de-correlation between antennas in a small handset can also be a key parameter in defining the overall performance in certain instances. A control method that considers the efficiency of both antennas and the isolation between them can be advantageous. For example, in an antenna diversity system, the antennas can be tuned so as to reduce coupling between the antennas without degrading the efficiency of either antenna, or to degrade efficiency minimally such that overall system performance is enhanced. Thus, even for closely spaced antennas in a handheld mobile application, the coupling may be reduced or otherwise kept to a minimum in spite of antenna proximity. Other parameters other than antenna cross-coupling may also be optimized to improve overall performance of the system, such as in a MIMO system where there can be simultaneously multiple output antennas and multiple input antennas.
In step 1704, it can be determined whether there are multiple on-antenna tuning elements. If there are more than one such tuning elements then in step 1706 tuning elements associated with a radiating element(s) can be tuned based on a desired VSWR at a frequency of operation. In step 1708, tuning elements associated with another radiating element(s) can be tuned based on a different factor, such as a rejection or attenuation of an unwanted frequency. If on the other hand, there is only one on-antenna tuning element and/or the tuning elements are only connected with one of the radiating elements of the antenna then method 1700 can proceed to step 1710 where the on-antenna tuning element(s) is tuned using an open loop and/or closed loop process. The open loop process can utilize various factors to determine tuning, including use case, operating frequency, proximity information accelerometer/position information, and so forth. The closed loop process can utilize various factors to determine tuning, including RF voltage, return loss, received power, current drain and/or transmitter linearity
In step 1712, tuning can be performed utilizing the matching network. The tuning of the matching network can be an open loop and/or closed loop process, including using one or more of the factors described above with respect to the open and closed loop processes that can tune the on-antenna tuning elements. The timing of the tuning utilizing the matching network can vary, including being performed simultaneously with tuning of the on-antenna tuning elements, after tuning of the on-antenna tuning elements and/or before tuning of the on-antenna tuning elements.
In one embodiment, the tuning of the matching network(s) can be performed in combination with look-up tables such as shown in
From the foregoing descriptions, it would be evident to an artisan with ordinary skill in the art that the aforementioned embodiments can be modified, reduced, or enhanced without departing from the scope and spirit of the claims described below. For example, detector 830 may include a directional coupler for the diversity antenna to compensate for out-of-band impedance of the Rx filter that may create a very high standing wave on the feed line and put voltage nulls at unpredictable places on the line (including at the base of the antenna).
In another embodiment, combinations of open and closed loop processes can be utilized for tuning of one or more of the tunable elements of the antenna and/or the matching network. For instance, a tunable element of the antenna can be tuned in part with a closed loop process based on an operational parameter of the communication system and in part with an open loop process based on a use case and/or location information of the communication device. In another embodiment, the use of closed loop and open loop processes can be alternated or otherwise arranged in being applied to a particular tunable element, such as initially applying an open loop process but then later applying a closed loop process, including switching from an open loop to a closed loop process based on operational parameters of the communication device. In another embodiment, the matching network can be tuned in whole or in part using an open loop process, such as based on a use case provided in a look-up table and/or based on location information associated with the communication device.
The exemplary embodiments can employ open loop tuning processes, such as at the on-antenna tunable element and/or at the matching network. The use cases can include a number of different states or status associated with the communication device, such as flip-open, flip-closed, slider-in, slider-out (e.g., Qwerty or numeric Keypad), speaker-phone on, speaker-phone off, hands-free operation, antenna up, antenna down, other communication modes on or off (e.g., Bluetooth/WiFi/GPS), particular frequency band, and/or transmit or receive mode. The use case can be based on object or surface proximity detection (e.g., a user's hand or a table). Other environmental effects can be included in the open loop process, such as temperature, pressure, velocity and/or altitude effects. The open loop process can take into account other information, such as associated with a particular location (e.g., in a building or in a city surrounded by buildings), as well as an indication of being out of range. The exemplary embodiments can utilize combinations of open loop and closed loop processes, such as tuning a tunable element based on both a use case and a measured operating parameter (e.g., measured by a detector in proximity to the antenna and/or measured by a directional coupler between the matching network and the transceiver). In other examples, the tuning can utilize one process and then switch to another process, such as using closed loop tuning and then switching to open loop tuning based on particular factors associated with the communication device. The use case can be based on the knowledge of transmitter power level setting and receiver received signal strength, current drain, accelerometer direction/orientation, and any other information that is available within the device (e.g., a handset, tablet, or other wireless communication device) indicative of operating modes or use case.
In one embodiment, Low Band (LB) radiating element(s) and High Band (HB) radiating element(s) can be utilized with the antenna, where at least one tunable element is associated with the LB radiating element is tuned based on a desired Voltage Standing Wave Ratio (VSWR) associated with the antenna, and wherein at least another tunable elements that is associated with the HB radiating element is tuned based on a different performance metric. The different performance metric can be based on attenuation of an undesired frequency. As an example, the undesired frequency can be a harmonic frequency or can be associated with an interferer.
Methodologies and/or components that are described herein with respect to tuning of one tunable element can also be utilized with respect to tuning of other tunable elements. For example, derivative information utilized for tuning the matching network can be used for tuning of on-antenna tunable elements.
Other suitable modifications can be applied to the present disclosure. Accordingly, the reader is directed to the claims for a fuller understanding of the breadth and scope of the present disclosure.
The machine may comprise a server computer, a client user computer, a personal computer (PC), a tablet PC, a laptop computer, a desktop computer, a control system, a network router, switch or bridge, or any machine capable of executing a set of instructions (sequential or otherwise) that specify actions to be taken by that machine. It will be understood that a device of the present disclosure includes broadly any electronic device that provides voice, video or data communication. Further, while a single machine is illustrated, the term “machine” shall also be taken to include any collection of machines that individually or jointly execute a set (or multiple sets) of instructions to perform any one or more of the methodologies discussed herein.
The computer system 1900 may include a processor 1902 (e.g., a central processing unit (CPU), a graphics processing unit (GPU, or both), a main memory 1904 and a static memory 1906, which communicate with each other via a bus 1908. The computer system 1900 may further include a video display unit 1910 (e.g., a liquid crystal display (LCD), a flat panel, a solid state display, or a cathode ray tube (CRT)). The computer system 1900 may include an input device 1912 (e.g., a keyboard), a cursor control device 1914 (e.g., a mouse), a disk drive unit 1916, a signal generation device 1918 (e.g., a speaker or remote control) and a network interface device 1920.
The disk drive unit 1916 may include a machine-readable medium 1922 on which is stored one or more sets of instructions (e.g., software 1924) embodying any one or more of the methodologies or functions described herein, including those methods illustrated above. The instructions 1924 may also reside, completely or at least partially, within the main memory 1904, the static memory 1906, and/or within the processor 1902 during execution thereof by the computer system 1900. The main memory 1904 and the processor 1902 also may constitute machine-readable media.
Dedicated hardware implementations including, but not limited to, application specific integrated circuits, programmable logic arrays and other hardware devices can likewise be constructed to implement the methods described herein. Applications that may include the apparatus and systems of various embodiments broadly include a variety of electronic and computer systems. Some embodiments implement functions in two or more specific interconnected hardware modules or devices with related control and data signals communicated between and through the modules, or as portions of an application-specific integrated circuit. Thus, the example system is applicable to software, firmware, and hardware implementations.
In accordance with various embodiments of the present disclosure, the methods described herein are intended for operation as software programs running on a computer processor. Furthermore, software implementations can include, but not limited to, distributed processing or component/object distributed processing, parallel processing, or virtual machine processing can also be constructed to implement the methods described herein.
The present disclosure contemplates a machine readable medium containing instructions 1924, or that which receives and executes instructions 1924 from a propagated signal so that a device connected to a network environment 1926 can send or receive voice, video or data, and to communicate over the network 1926 using the instructions 1924. The instructions 1924 may further be transmitted or received over a network 1926 via the network interface device 1920.
While the machine-readable medium 1922 is shown in an example embodiment to be a single medium, the term “machine-readable medium” should be taken to include a single medium or multiple media (e.g., a centralized or distributed database, and/or associated caches and servers) that store the one or more sets of instructions. The term “machine-readable medium” shall also be taken to include any medium that is capable of storing, encoding or carrying a set of instructions for execution by the machine and that cause the machine to perform any one or more of the methodologies of the present disclosure.
The term “machine-readable medium” shall accordingly be taken to include, but not be limited to: solid-state memories such as a memory card or other package that houses one or more read-only (non-volatile) memories, random access memories, or other re-writable (volatile) memories; magneto-optical or optical medium such as a disk or tape; and/or a digital file attachment to e-mail or other self-contained information archive or set of archives is considered a distribution medium equivalent to a tangible storage medium. Accordingly, the disclosure is considered to include any one or more of a machine-readable medium or a distribution medium, as listed herein and including art-recognized equivalents and successor media, in which the software implementations herein are stored.
Although the present specification describes components and functions implemented in the embodiments with reference to particular standards and protocols, the disclosure is not limited to such standards and protocols. Each of the standards for Internet and other packet switched network transmission (e.g., TCP/IP, UDP/IP, HTML, HTTP) represent examples of the state of the art. Such standards are periodically superseded by faster or more efficient equivalents having essentially the same functions. Accordingly, replacement standards and protocols having the same functions are considered equivalents.
The illustrations of embodiments described herein are intended to provide a general understanding of the structure of various embodiments, and they are not intended to serve as a complete description of all the elements and features of apparatus and systems that might make use of the structures described herein. Many other embodiments will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the above description. Other embodiments may be utilized and derived therefrom, such that structural and logical substitutions and changes may be made without departing from the scope of this disclosure. Figures are also merely representational and may not be drawn to scale. Certain proportions thereof may be exaggerated, while others may be minimized. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
Such embodiments of the inventive subject matter may be referred to herein, individually and/or collectively, by the term “invention” merely for convenience and without intending to voluntarily limit the scope of this application to any single invention or inventive concept if more than one is in fact disclosed. Thus, although specific embodiments have been illustrated and described herein, it should be appreciated that any arrangement calculated to achieve the same purpose may be substituted for the specific embodiments shown. This disclosure is intended to cover any and all adaptations or variations of various embodiments. Combinations of the above embodiments, and other embodiments not specifically described herein, will be apparent to those of skill in the art upon reviewing the above description.
The Abstract of the Disclosure is provided with the understanding that it will not be used to interpret or limit the scope or meaning of the claims. In addition, in the foregoing Detailed Description, it can be seen that various features are grouped together in a single embodiment for the purpose of streamlining the disclosure. This method of disclosure is not to be interpreted as reflecting an intention that the claimed embodiments require more features than are expressly recited in each claim. Rather, as the following claims reflect, inventive subject matter lies in less than all features of a single disclosed embodiment. Thus the following claims are hereby incorporated into the Detailed Description, with each claim standing on its own as a separately claimed subject matter.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/060,155, filed Oct. 22, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/108,463, filed May 16, 2011 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,594,584), and is related to U.S. application Ser. No. 13/108,589, filed May 16, 2011 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,626,083), the disclosures of all of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2745067 | True | May 1956 | A |
3117279 | Ludvigson | Jan 1964 | A |
3160832 | Beitman | Dec 1964 | A |
3390337 | Beitman | Jun 1968 | A |
3443231 | Roza | May 1969 | A |
3509500 | McNair | Apr 1970 | A |
3571716 | Hill | Mar 1971 | A |
3590385 | Sabo | Jun 1971 | A |
3601717 | Kuecken | Aug 1971 | A |
3742279 | Kupsky | Jun 1973 | A |
3749491 | Maxfield et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3794941 | Templin | Feb 1974 | A |
3919644 | Smolka | Nov 1975 | A |
3990024 | Hou | Nov 1976 | A |
3995237 | Brunner | Nov 1976 | A |
4186359 | Kaegebein | Jan 1980 | A |
4201960 | Skutta | May 1980 | A |
4227256 | O'Keefe | Oct 1980 | A |
4383441 | Willis | May 1983 | A |
4476578 | Gaudin | Oct 1984 | A |
4493112 | Bruene | Jan 1985 | A |
4509019 | Banu et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4777490 | Sharma | Oct 1988 | A |
4799066 | Deacon | Jan 1989 | A |
4965607 | Wilkins | Oct 1990 | A |
4970478 | Townley et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4980656 | Duffalo | Dec 1990 | A |
5032805 | Elmer | Jul 1991 | A |
5136478 | Bruder | Aug 1992 | A |
5142255 | Chang | Aug 1992 | A |
5177670 | Shinohara | Jan 1993 | A |
5195045 | Keane | Mar 1993 | A |
5200826 | Seong | Apr 1993 | A |
5212463 | Babbitt | May 1993 | A |
5216392 | Fraser et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5230091 | Vaisanen et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5243358 | Sanford | Sep 1993 | A |
5258728 | Taniyoshi | Nov 1993 | A |
5276912 | Siwiak | Jan 1994 | A |
5301358 | Gaskill | Apr 1994 | A |
5307033 | Koscica | Apr 1994 | A |
5310358 | Johnson | May 1994 | A |
5312790 | Sengupta | May 1994 | A |
5334958 | Babbitt | Aug 1994 | A |
5361403 | Dent | Nov 1994 | A |
5371473 | Trinh | Dec 1994 | A |
5409889 | Das | Apr 1995 | A |
5427988 | Sengupta | Jun 1995 | A |
5430417 | Martin | Jul 1995 | A |
5446447 | Carney | Aug 1995 | A |
5448252 | Ali | Sep 1995 | A |
5451567 | Das | Sep 1995 | A |
5451914 | Stengel | Sep 1995 | A |
5457394 | McEwan | Oct 1995 | A |
5472935 | Yandrofski | Dec 1995 | A |
5479139 | Koscica | Dec 1995 | A |
5486491 | Sengupta | Jan 1996 | A |
5496795 | Das | Mar 1996 | A |
5502372 | Quan | Mar 1996 | A |
5524281 | Bradley | Jun 1996 | A |
5548837 | Hess et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5561407 | Koscica | Oct 1996 | A |
5583359 | Ng et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5589844 | Belcher et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5593495 | Masuda | Jan 1997 | A |
5635433 | Sengupta | Jun 1997 | A |
5635434 | Sengupta | Jun 1997 | A |
5640042 | Koscica | Jun 1997 | A |
5679624 | Das | Oct 1997 | A |
5689219 | Piirainen | Nov 1997 | A |
5693429 | Sengupta | Dec 1997 | A |
5694134 | Barnes | Dec 1997 | A |
5699071 | Urakami | Dec 1997 | A |
5721194 | Yandrofski | Feb 1998 | A |
5766697 | Sengupta | Jun 1998 | A |
5777581 | Lilly | Jul 1998 | A |
5778308 | Sroka | Jul 1998 | A |
5786727 | Sigmon | Jul 1998 | A |
5812572 | King | Sep 1998 | A |
5812943 | Suzuki | Sep 1998 | A |
5830591 | Sengupta | Nov 1998 | A |
5846893 | Sengupta | Dec 1998 | A |
5874926 | Tsuru | Feb 1999 | A |
5880635 | Satoh | Mar 1999 | A |
5886867 | Chivukula | Mar 1999 | A |
5892482 | Coleman et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5926751 | Vlahos et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5929717 | Richardson | Jul 1999 | A |
5940030 | Hampel et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5963871 | Zhinong | Oct 1999 | A |
5969582 | Boesch | Oct 1999 | A |
5973568 | Shapiro et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5982099 | Barnes et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5990766 | Zhang | Nov 1999 | A |
6008759 | Tangemann et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009124 | Smith | Dec 1999 | A |
6020787 | Kim | Feb 2000 | A |
6020795 | Kim | Feb 2000 | A |
6029075 | Das | Feb 2000 | A |
6045932 | Jia | Apr 2000 | A |
6061025 | Jackson | May 2000 | A |
6064865 | Kuo et al. | May 2000 | A |
6074971 | Chiu | Jun 2000 | A |
6096127 | Dimos | Aug 2000 | A |
6100733 | Dortu | Aug 2000 | A |
6101102 | Brand | Aug 2000 | A |
6115585 | Matero | Sep 2000 | A |
6125266 | Matero et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6133868 | Butler et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6133883 | Munson | Oct 2000 | A |
6172385 | Duncombe | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6215644 | Dhuler | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6242989 | Barber | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6266528 | Farzaneh | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6281748 | Klomsdorf et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281847 | Lee | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6309895 | Jaing | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6343208 | Ying | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6377142 | Chiu | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377217 | Zhu | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377440 | Zhu | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6384785 | Kamogawa | May 2002 | B1 |
6404614 | Zhu | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6408190 | Ying | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6414562 | Bouisse | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6415562 | Donaghue | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6438360 | Alberth, Jr. et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6452776 | Chakravorty | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6461930 | Akram | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6466774 | Okabe | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6492883 | Liang | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6514895 | Chiu | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6525630 | Zhu | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6531936 | Chiu | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6535076 | Partridge | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6535722 | Rosen | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6538603 | Chen | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6556102 | Sengupta | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556814 | Klomsdorf | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6570462 | Edmonson | May 2003 | B2 |
6590468 | du Toit | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6590541 | Schultze | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6597265 | Liang | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6608603 | Alexopoulos | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6624786 | Boyle | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6628962 | Katsura et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6640085 | Chatzipetros | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6657595 | Phillips | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6661638 | Jackson | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6670256 | Yang | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6710651 | Forrester | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6724611 | Mosley | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6724890 | Bareis | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6737179 | Sengupta | May 2004 | B2 |
6747522 | Pietruszynski et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6759918 | Du Toit | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6765540 | Toncich | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6768472 | Alexopoulos | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6774077 | Sengupta | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6795712 | Vakilian | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6825818 | Toncich | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6839028 | Lee | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6845126 | Dent | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6859104 | Toncich | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6862432 | Kim | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6864757 | Du Toit | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6868260 | Jagielski | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6875655 | Lin | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6882245 | Utsunomiya | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6888714 | Shaw | May 2005 | B2 |
6905989 | Ellis | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6906653 | Uno | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6907234 | Karr | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6914487 | Doyle et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6920315 | Wilcox et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6922330 | Nielsen | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6943078 | Zheng | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6946847 | Nishimori | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6949442 | Barth | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6961368 | Dent | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6964296 | Memory | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6965837 | Vintola | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6987493 | Chen | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6993297 | Smith | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6999297 | Klee | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7009455 | Toncich | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7071776 | Forrester | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7106715 | Kelton | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7107033 | du Toit | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7113614 | Rhoads | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7151411 | Martin | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7176634 | Kitamura | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7176845 | Fabrega-Sanchez | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7180467 | Fabrega-Sanchez | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7218186 | Chen et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7221327 | Toncich | May 2007 | B2 |
7298329 | Diament | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7299018 | Van Rumpt | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7312118 | Kiyotoshi | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7332980 | Zhu | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7332981 | Matsuno | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7339527 | Sager | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7369828 | Shamsaifar | May 2008 | B2 |
7426373 | Clingman | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7427949 | Channabasappa et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7453405 | Nishikido et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7468638 | Tsai | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7469129 | Blaker et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7528674 | Kato et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7531011 | Yamasaki | May 2009 | B2 |
7535080 | Zeng et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7535312 | McKinzie | May 2009 | B2 |
7539527 | Jang | May 2009 | B2 |
7557507 | Wu | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7567782 | Liu et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7596357 | Nakamata | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7633355 | Matsuo | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7642879 | Matsuno | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7655530 | Hosking | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7667663 | Hsiao | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7671693 | Brobston et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7705692 | Fukamachi et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7711337 | McKinzie | May 2010 | B2 |
7714676 | McKinzie | May 2010 | B2 |
7714678 | du Toit | May 2010 | B2 |
7728693 | du Toit et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7760699 | Malik | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7768400 | Lawrence et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7786819 | Ella | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7795990 | du Toit | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7830320 | Shamblin et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7852170 | McKinzie | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7856228 | Lekutai et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7865154 | Mendolia | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7907094 | Kakitsu et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7917104 | Manssen et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7940223 | Dou et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7949309 | Rofougaran | May 2011 | B2 |
7969257 | du Toit | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7983615 | Bryce et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7991363 | Greene | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8008982 | McKinzie | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8072285 | Spears | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8112043 | Knudsen et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8170510 | Knudsen et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8190109 | Ali et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8204446 | Scheer | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8213886 | Blin | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8217731 | McKinzie et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8217732 | McKinzie | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8299867 | McKinzie | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8320850 | Khlat | Nov 2012 | B1 |
8325097 | McKinzie, III et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8405563 | McKinzie et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8421548 | Spears et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8432234 | Manssen et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8442457 | Harel et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8454882 | Chan et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8457569 | Blin | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8472888 | Manssen et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8478344 | Rofougaran et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8543123 | Moon et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8543176 | Daniel et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8558633 | McKinzie, III | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8564381 | McKinzie | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8594584 | Greene et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8620236 | Manssen et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8620246 | McKinzie et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8620247 | McKinzie et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8655286 | Mendolia | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8674783 | Spears et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8680934 | McKinzie et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8693963 | du Toit et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8712340 | Hoirup et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8712348 | Brobston et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
8773019 | Pham et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8774743 | Ali et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8787845 | Manssen et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8803631 | Greene et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8860525 | Spears et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8948889 | Spears et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8957742 | Spears et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9026062 | Greene et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9083405 | Christoffersson et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9119152 | Blin | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9231643 | Greene et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9374113 | Manssen et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9379454 | Rabe et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9473194 | Domino et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9698758 | Spears et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9698858 | Hoirup et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9742375 | Manssen et al. | Aug 2017 | B2 |
9762416 | Mandegaran et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9768752 | du Toit et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9768810 | Greene et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9853363 | Ali et al. | Dec 2017 | B2 |
20020008672 | Gothard et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020030566 | Bozler | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020047154 | Sowlati et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020079982 | Lafleur et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020109642 | Gee et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020118075 | Ohwada | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020145483 | Bouisse | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020167963 | Joa-Ng | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020183013 | Auckland et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020187780 | Souissi | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020191703 | Ling | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193088 | Jung | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030060227 | Sekine | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030071300 | Yashima | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030114124 | Higuchi | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030137464 | Foti et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030142022 | Ollikainen | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030184319 | Nishimori et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030193997 | Dent et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030199286 | du Toit | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030210203 | Phillips et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030210206 | Phillips et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030216150 | Ueda | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030232607 | Le Bars | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040009754 | Smith | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040090372 | Nallo | May 2004 | A1 |
20040100341 | Luetzelschwab | May 2004 | A1 |
20040125027 | Rubinshteyn et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040127178 | Kuffner | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040137950 | Bolin | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040202399 | Kochergin | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040204027 | Park et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040227176 | York | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040232982 | Ichitsubo et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040257293 | Friedrich | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040263411 | Fabrega-Sanchez et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040264610 | Marro et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050007291 | Fabrega-Sanchez | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050032488 | Pehlke | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050032541 | Wang | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050042994 | Otaka | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050059362 | Kalajo | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050082636 | Yashima | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050083234 | Poilasne et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085204 | Poilasne et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050093624 | Forrester et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050130608 | Forse | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050130699 | Kim | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050145987 | Okuda et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050208960 | Hassan | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050215204 | Wallace | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050227627 | Cyr et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050227633 | Dunko | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050259011 | Vance | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050260962 | Nazrul et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050264455 | Talvitie | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050280588 | Fujikawa et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050282503 | Onno | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060003537 | Sinha | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060009165 | Alles | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060022882 | Gerder et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060030277 | Cyr et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060077082 | Shanks et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060084392 | Marholev et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060099915 | Laroia et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060099952 | Prehofer et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060119511 | Collinson et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060148415 | Hamalainen et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060160501 | Mendolia et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060183431 | Chang et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060183433 | Mori et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060183442 | Chang et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060195161 | Li et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060205368 | Bustamante | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060223451 | Posamentier | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060252391 | Poilasne et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060281423 | Caimi | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070001924 | Hirabayashi et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070013483 | Stewart | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070035458 | Ohba et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070042725 | Poilasne | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070042734 | Ryu | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070063788 | Zhu | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070077956 | Julian et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070080888 | Mohamadi | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070082611 | Terranova et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070085609 | Itkin et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070091006 | Thober et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070093282 | Chang et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070109716 | Martin et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070111681 | Alberth et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070121267 | Kotani et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070142011 | Shatara | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070142014 | Wilcox | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070149146 | Hwang | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070171879 | Bourque | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070182636 | Carlson | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070184825 | Lim et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070194859 | Brobston | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070197180 | McKinzie et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070200766 | McKinzie | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070200773 | Dou et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070210899 | Kato et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070222697 | Caimi et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070248238 | Abreu et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070285326 | McKinzie | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070293176 | Yu | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080007478 | Jung | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080018541 | Pang | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080030165 | Lisac et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080051096 | Rao et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080055016 | Morris | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080055168 | Massey et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080081670 | Rofougaran | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080090539 | Thompson | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080090573 | Kim et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080094149 | Brobston | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080106350 | McKinzie | May 2008 | A1 |
20080111748 | Dunn et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080122553 | McKinzie | May 2008 | A1 |
20080122723 | Rofougaran | May 2008 | A1 |
20080129612 | Wang | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080158076 | Walley | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080174508 | Iwai et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080261544 | Blin et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080266190 | Ohba et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080274706 | Blin et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080280570 | Blin | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080285729 | Glasgow et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080288028 | Larson et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294718 | Okano | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080300027 | Dou | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080305749 | Ben-Bassat | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080305750 | Alon et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080309617 | Kong et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090002077 | Rohani et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090027286 | Ohishi | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090039976 | McKinzie, III | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090051604 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090051611 | Shamblin et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090079656 | Peyla et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090082017 | Chang et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090088093 | Nentwig et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090109880 | Kim et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090121963 | Greene | May 2009 | A1 |
20090149136 | Rofougaran | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090180403 | Tudosoiu | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090184879 | Derneryd | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090196192 | Lim et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090215446 | Hapsari et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090231220 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090253385 | Dent et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090264065 | Song | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090278685 | Potyrailo | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090295651 | Dou et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090323572 | Shi et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090323582 | Proctor et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100041348 | Wilcox et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100053009 | Rofougaran | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100060531 | Rappaport | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100073103 | Spears et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100085260 | McKinzie | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100085884 | Srinivasan et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100105425 | Asokan | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100107067 | Vaisanen et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100134215 | Lee et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100156552 | McKinzie | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100164640 | McKinzie | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100164641 | McKinzie | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100201598 | Lau et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100214189 | Kanazawa | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100232474 | Rofougaran | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100244576 | Hillan et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100277363 | Kainulainen et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100285836 | Horihata et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100302106 | Knudsen et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100304684 | Duron et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100304688 | Knudsen et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100308933 | See et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110002080 | Ranta | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110012790 | Badaruzzaman | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110012792 | Krenz | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110014879 | Alberth et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110014886 | Manssen | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110019606 | Umeda et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110026415 | Kamuf et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110039504 | Nguyen et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110043298 | McKinzie | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110043328 | Bassali | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110053524 | Manssen | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110063042 | Mendolia | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110086600 | Muhammad et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110086630 | Manssen et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110102290 | Milosavljevic | May 2011 | A1 |
20110105023 | Scheer | May 2011 | A1 |
20110116395 | Tsuda et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110116423 | Rousu et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110117863 | Camp, Jr. et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110117973 | Asrani et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110121079 | Lawrence et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110122040 | Wakabayashi et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110133994 | Korva | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110140982 | Ozden et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110183628 | Baker | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110183633 | Ohba et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110195679 | Lee et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110227666 | Manssen | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110237207 | Bauder | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110249760 | Chrisikos et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110250852 | Greene | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110254637 | Manssen | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110254638 | Manssen | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110256857 | Chen et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110281532 | Shin et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110285511 | Maguire et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110299438 | Mikhemar et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110306310 | Bai | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110309980 | Ali et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120039189 | Suzuki et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120051409 | Brobston et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120062431 | Tikka et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120075159 | Chang et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120084537 | Indukuru et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120094708 | Park et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120099462 | Yuda et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120100802 | Mohebbi | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120112851 | Manssen et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120112852 | Manssen et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120112970 | Mow et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120119843 | du Toit et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120119844 | du Toit et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120139810 | Faraone et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120154975 | Oakes | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120214421 | Hoirup et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120220243 | Mendolia | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120243579 | Premakanthan et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120286586 | Balm | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120293384 | Knudsen et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120295554 | Greene et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120295555 | Greene et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120309332 | Liao et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130005277 | Klomsdorf et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130052967 | Black et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130056841 | Hsieh et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130076579 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130076580 | Zhang et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130106332 | Williams et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130122829 | Hyvonen et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130137384 | Desclos et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130154897 | Sorensen et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130182583 | Siomina et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130194054 | Presti | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130215846 | Yerrabommanahalli et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130231155 | Sheynman et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130265912 | Ikonen et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130293425 | Zhu et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130315285 | Black et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140002323 | Ali et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140009360 | Ikonen et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140128032 | Muthukumar et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140162572 | Hirabayashi | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140210686 | Ali et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140287698 | Ali et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20160173172 | Greene | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160241276 | Zhu | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160269055 | Greene et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160277129 | Manssen | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160322991 | McKinzie | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160336916 | Du Toit et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160352408 | Greene | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160373146 | Manssen et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170011858 | Oakes et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170085244 | Manssen et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170264322 | Greene et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170264335 | Hoirup et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170294891 | McKinzie, III | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20170373661 | Manssen et al. | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180083657 | Manssen et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180109235 | McKinzie et al. | Apr 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2914562 | Jun 2016 | CA |
101640949 | Feb 2010 | CN |
201765685 | Mar 2011 | CN |
105703797 | Jun 2016 | CN |
19614655 | Oct 1997 | DE |
10258805 | Mar 2005 | DE |
102008050743 | Apr 2010 | DE |
102009018648 | Oct 2010 | DE |
0909024 | Apr 1999 | EM |
0685936 | Jun 1995 | EP |
0909024 | Apr 1999 | EP |
1079296 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1137192 | Sep 2001 | EP |
1298810 | Apr 2006 | EP |
2214085 | Aug 2010 | EP |
2328233 | Jun 2011 | EP |
2388925 | Nov 2011 | EP |
2424119 | Feb 2012 | EP |
2638640 | Jul 2014 | EP |
3131157 | Feb 2017 | EP |
03276901 | Mar 1990 | JP |
02-077580 | Sep 1991 | JP |
9321526 | Dec 1997 | JP |
10209722 | Aug 1998 | JP |
2000124066 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2005-130441 | May 2005 | JP |
100645526 | Nov 2006 | KR |
10-0740177 | Jul 2007 | KR |
2001071846 | Sep 2001 | WO |
2006031170 | Mar 2006 | WO |
2008030165 | Mar 2008 | WO |
2009064968 | May 2009 | WO |
2009108391 | Sep 2009 | WO |
2009155966 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2010028521 | Mar 2010 | WO |
2010121914 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2011044592 | Apr 2011 | WO |
2011084716 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2011084716 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2011102143 | Aug 2011 | WO |
2011133657 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2011028453 | Oct 2011 | WO |
2012067622 | May 2012 | WO |
2012085932 | Jun 2012 | WO |
2012085932 | Jun 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC issued by the European Patent Office, dated Nov. 16, 2017. European Patent Application 12177197.6. |
Canadian Office Action dated Feb. 8, 2018, application No. 2826573, 4 pages. |
Canadian Office Action, Application No. 2,821,173, dated Oct. 17, 2016. |
Extended European Search Report for 12749235.3 dated, Jun. 8, 2017. |
“European Search Report”, 16151299.1 search report, dated 2016. |
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 16155235.1, dated May 3, 2016. |
“Office Action Received in China Patent Application 201080045689.X”, dated Mar. 4, 2016, 6 pages. |
“Search Report”, ROC (Taiwan) Patent Application No. 101117467, English Translation, dated Apr. 12, 2016, 1 page. |
Bezooijen, A. et al., “A GSM/EDGE/WCDMA Adaptive Series-LC Matching Network Using RF-MEMS Switches”, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, vol. 43, No. 10, Oct. 2008, 2259-2268. |
Canadian IPO, , “Office Action dated Mar. 10, 2017”, Mar. 10, 2017, 1-3. |
Du Toit, , “Tunable Microwave Devices With Auto Adjusting Matching Circuit”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/302,617, filed Nov. 22, 2011. |
Du Toit, , “Tunable Microwave Devices With Auto-Adjusting Matching Circuit”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/302,649, filed Nov. 22, 2011. |
Eiji, N. , “High-Frequency Circuit and Its Manufacture”, Patent Abstracts of Japan, vol. 1998, No. 13, Nov. 30, 1998 & JP 10 209722 A (Seiko Epson Corp), Aug. 7, 1998. |
EPO, , “Extended European Search Report”, 1-9. |
EPO, , “Extended European Search Report, EP16188956.3,”, dated Jan. 9, 2017, 1-9. |
Greene, , “Method and Apparatus for Tuning a Communication Device”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/108,463, filed May 16, 2011. |
Greene, , “Method and Apparatus for Tuning a Communication Device”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/108,589, filed May 16, 2011. |
Hoirup, , “Method and Apparatus for Radio Antenna Frequency Tuning”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/030,177, filed Feb. 18, 2011. |
Huang, Libo et al., “Theoretical and experimental investigation of adaptive antenna impedance matching for multiband mobile phone applications”, IEEE, Sep. 7, 2005, 13-17. |
Hyun, S. , “Effects of strain on the dielectric properties of tunable dielectric SrTi03 thin films”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 79, No. 2, Jul. 9, 2001. |
Ida, I. et al., “An Adaptive Impedence Matching System and Its Application to Mobile Antennas”, TENCON 2004, IEEE Region 10 Conference, See Abstract ad p. 544, Nov. 21-24, 2004, 543-547. |
Katsuya, K. , “Hybrid Integrated Circuit Device”, Patent Abstracts of Japan, Publication No. 03-276901, Date of publication of application: Sep. 12, 1991. |
Manssen, , “Method and Apparatus for Managing Interference in a Communication Device”, U.S. Appl. No. 61/326,206, filed Apr. 20, 2010. |
Manssen, , “Method and Apparatus for Tuning Antennas in a Communication Device”, U.S. Appl. No. 12/941,972, filed Nov. 8, 2010. |
Manssen, , “Method and Apparatus for Tuning Antennas in a Communication Device”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/005,122, filed Jan. 12, 2011. |
McKinzie, , “Adaptive Impedance Matching Module (AIMM) Control Architectures”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/293,544, filed Nov. 10, 2011. |
McKinzie, , “Adaptive Impedance Matching Module (AIMM) Control Architectures”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/293,550, filed Nov. 10, 2011. |
McKinzie, , “Method and Apparatus for Adaptive Impedance Matching”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/217,748, filed Aug. 25, 2011. |
Mendolia, , “Method and Apparatus for Tuning a Communication Device”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/035,417, filed Feb. 25, 2011. |
Paratek Microwave, Inc., , “Method and Appartus for Tuning Antennas in a Communication Device”, International Application No. PCT/US11/59620; Filed Nov. 7, 2011. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, , “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, International Application No. PCT/US2010/046241, dated Mar. 2, 2011. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, , “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, International Application No. PCT/US2010/056413, dated Jul. 27, 2011. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, , “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, dated Nov. 16, 2011, International Application No. PCT/US/2011/038543. |
Patent Cooperation Treaty, , “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, PCT Application No. PCT/US08/005085, dated Jul. 2, 2008. |
Payandehjoo, Kasra et al., “Investigation of Parasitic Elements for Coupling Reduction in MultiAntenna Hand-Set Devices”, Published online Jan. 22, 2013 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com). |
Pervez, N.K. , “High Tunability barium strontium titanate thin films for RF circuit applications”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 85, No. 19, Nov. 8, 2004. |
Petit, Laurent , “MEMS-Switched Parasitic-Antenna Array for Radiation Pattern Diversity”, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 54, No. 9, Sep. 2009, 2624-2631. |
Qiao, et al., “Antenna Impedance Mismatch Measurement and Correction for Adaptive COMA Transceivers”, IEEE, Jan. 2005. |
Qiao, et al., “Measurement of Antenna Load Impedance for Power Amplifiers”, The Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of California, San Diego, Sep. 13, 2004. |
Spears, , “Methods for Tuning an Adaptive Impedance Matching Network With a Look-Up Table”, U.S. Appl. No. 13/297,951, filed Nov. 16, 2011. |
Stemmer, Susanne , “Low-loss tunable capacitors fabricated directly on gold bottom electrodes”, Applied Physics Letters 88, 112905, Mar. 15, 2006. |
Taylor, T.R. , “Impact of thermal strain on the dielectric constant of sputtered barium strontium titanate thin films”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 80, No. 11, Mar. 18, 2002. |
Tombak, Ali , “Tunable Barium Strontium Titanate Thin Film Capacitors for RF and Microwave Applications”, IEEE Microwave and Wireles Components Letters, vol. 12, Jan. 2002. |
Xu, Hongtao , “Tunable Microwave Integrated Circuits using BST Thin Film Capacitors with Device”, Integrated Ferroelectrics, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Engineering, University of California, 2005, Apr. 2005. |
Zuo, S. , “Eigenmode Decoupling for Mimo Loop-Antenna Based on 180 Coupler”, Progress in Electromagnetics Research Letters, vol. 26, Aug. 2011, 11-20. |
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, Application No. 10822849.5, dated Oct. 11, 2017, 5 pages. |
Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, EPO application No. 16151299.1, dated Jun. 22, 2018. |
India, Patent O., “Examination Report”, for Application No. 9844/DELNP/2013, dated Apr. 25, 2018, 5 pages. |
Intellectual Property India, “First Examination Report”, for Application No. 3160/CHE/2013 dated Jun. 5, 2018, dated Jun. 5, 2018, 5 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170294712 A1 | Oct 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14060155 | Oct 2013 | US |
Child | 15632021 | US | |
Parent | 13108463 | May 2011 | US |
Child | 14060155 | US |