This invention relates in general to circuits for controlling fuel injectors for vehicle engines and in particular to a supplemental fuel injector control circuit for varying the duration of a fuel injector pulse length.
Fuel injection provides carefully controlled metering of fuel supplied to a vehicle engine. The careful control of fuel supply enhances engine performance and mileage while reducing harmful emissions. Referring now to the drawings, there is shown in
ECUs are becoming increasingly sophisticated, providing advanced diagnostic capabilities to detect problems within the system. The ECU microprocessor 19 monitors the fuel injection cycle to determine if the injector and injector controller are operating properly. As described above, when the fuel injector control MOSFET 16 is placed into a non-conducting state, the magnetic field in the fuel injector coil 14 collapses, causing a voltage spike that is greater than the supply voltage and that is applied to the fault detection circuit 20. The fault detection circuit 20 is operable to change the condition of the microprocessor feedback port 22 upon detection of a voltage spike. Logic within the ECU microprocessor is selectively operative to set an error flag in response to the changed condition on the microprocessor feedback port 22. Typically, an error flag is set if a voltage spike is detected when the injector is supposed to be off or if the voltage spike does not occur within an expected time period following the injector being turned off. Upon detection of a fault, a warning signal, such as the illumination of a warning light upon the vehicle dashboard, is generated to inform the vehicle operator that the engine is not operating properly. Additionally, a fault condition may place the ECU into a “limp home” mode and save an error code in memory for a later diagnostic.
The operation of the fault detection circuit 20 is illustrated in
When modifications are made to a vehicle engine, such as replacing the exhaust system, the stock ECU 10 no longer provides the correct fuel amount across the engine's operating range. A resulting lean fuel/air mixture may be corrected by holding the fuel injector open for a longer period of time, i.e., by increasing the length of the voltage pulse applied to the fuel injector coil 14. Similarly, a resulting rich fuel/air mixture may be corrected by holding the fuel injector open for a shorter period of time, i.e., by decreasing the length of the voltage pulse applied to the fuel injector coil 14. However, as described above, the injector coil 14 is monitored by the ECU 10 and the ECU will erroneously conclude that the ECU injector closed either early or late and will generate an engine error code, indicating a fault in the injection circuit. Additionally, engine tuners may desire to change the timing of when the injector voltage pulse occurs relative to when the cylinder intake valve opens. Such changes may also trigger false error codes. Accordingly it would be desirable to provide a circuit that would allow varying the fuel injector pulse length and/or timing without triggering ECU error messages.
This invention relates to a supplemental fuel injector control circuit for varying the duration of a fuel injector pulse length.
The present invention contemplates a supplemental fuel injector control circuit that includes an electronic switch adapted to be connected to a fuel injector coil, the electronic switch being operable to control the flow of an electric current through the fuel injector coil. The control circuit also includes a capacitor adapted to be connected to the fuel injector coil and an electronic switching circuit that has an input port connected to the capacitor and an output port adapted to be connected to a voltage control port on an engine control unit. The present invention further contemplates a microprocessor connected to the electronic switch and the engine control unit voltage control port, the microprocessor operative upon a change in a condition at the engine control unit voltage control port to supply a voltage having a modified pulse length to the fuel injector coil. Additionally, the electronic switching circuit is operative upon a further change in a condition at the engine control unit voltage control port to cause the electronic switching circuit to supply energy stored within the capacitor to the engine control unit voltage control port to simulate the duration of a normal fuel injector control pulse.
The present invention also contemplates the method of operation of the control circuit described above.
Various objects and advantages of this invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment, when read in light of the accompanying drawings.
Referring again to the drawings, there is illustrated in
The present invention contemplates allowing the injector pulse width, or duty cycle, to be modified without the ECU 10 sensing the modification. Thus, modification of the injector duty cycle will not cause generation of an error signal. The invention contemplates that the energy in the voltage spike generated by the collapse of the magnetic field in the injector coil is stored in a capacitor C2. The stored energy is then sent to the ECU 10 when the ECU control port 12 transitions to an off condition, thus providing a virtual voltage spike at the expected time regardless of when the actual voltage spike was received. The pulse from the previous injector opening is used to supply the energy stored in the capacitor. The supplemental control circuit also includes an electronic switch, such as a FET, for supplying a voltage pulse to the injector coil that has the desired duration and that may differ from that supplied by the ECU 10.
The operation of the supplemental control circuit will now be described. As described above, the ECU injector control output is typically a MOSFET or a Bipolar transistor. For the injector to be turned off, the transistor drain or collector is open. Under this condition, D1 is reverse biased leaving its cathode pulled to 5V through R1. R5 & R6 form a voltage divider to drop the 5V signal to the 3.3V required by the microcontroller. When the ECU turns the injector on, the injector control output 12 is pulled to nearly zero volts, forward biasing D1 and dropping its cathode voltage to the forward voltage drop of the diode, which is approximately 0.6-1V. The microcontroller within the supplemental control circuit measures the resulting pulse and, depending on the user parameters and engine conditions, outputs a pulse unchanged, shortened or lengthened to Q3 which turns the injector on through Q4.
When Q4 turns off, the magnetic field created by the injector coil collapses, causing a voltage spike. D3 becomes forward biased causing C2 to become charged over a several pulses. The maximum voltage is limited to a voltage determined by Q4's specifications.
While the ECU's injector control output is on (low voltage), C1 is discharged through R1 & R2 to D1's forward voltage drop. When the injector control output 12 is turned off the abrupt voltage rise turns on Q1. Q1 remains on until Q1's gate voltage drops below its threshold voltage due to C1 charging through R1 and R2. Q2's (P-channel) gate is pulled low through R3 and Q1, turning on Q2 and passing the voltage present on C2 to the ECU injector control port 12. The ECU interprets the received voltage spike as if it were created by the injector itself preventing the ECU from generating an injector fault condition. Additionally, should the injector cease to function properly, it will not generate a voltage spike and so will not charge the capacitor C2. The ECU will then not sense the expected discharge spike and will set an error code as usual.
The operation of the supplemental control circuit is illustrated by
Referring now to
In accordance with the provisions of the patent statutes, the principle and mode of operation of this invention have been explained and illustrated in its preferred embodiment. However, it must be understood that this invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically explained and illustrated without departing from its spirit or scope. Thus, while the invention has been explained and illustrated for controlling a single fuel injector, it will be appreciated that it also may be practiced for the multiple fuel injectors utilized on a multi-cylinder engine. Additionally, while a capacitor has been shown and described as the energy storage device for generating virtual voltage spikes, other energy storage devices also may be utilized.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/232,264, filed Aug. 7, 2009, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4209829 | Leichle | Jun 1980 | A |
4320729 | Sawada et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4355619 | Wilkinson | Oct 1982 | A |
4370962 | Hosaka | Feb 1983 | A |
4499878 | Igashira et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4531495 | Yamato et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4649886 | Igashira et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
5153835 | Hashimoto et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5515830 | Arakowa | May 1996 | A |
5941216 | Arakowa | Aug 1999 | A |
5954030 | Shurman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6005763 | North | Dec 1999 | A |
6102008 | Maeda et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6286492 | Kanno | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6923163 | Yamazaki | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7000599 | Kirkpatrick | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7124742 | Kirkpatrick | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7177759 | Nakamura | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7527040 | Couch | May 2009 | B2 |
20050111160 | Faggioli et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20060178803 | Nakamura | Aug 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61232264 | Aug 2009 | US |