Method and apparatus for vertically stacking mailpieces via the top or bottom of the stack

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6799760
  • Patent Number
    6,799,760
  • Date Filed
    Monday, September 30, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 5, 2004
    20 years ago
  • Inventors
  • Original Assignees
  • Examiners
    • Walsh; Donald P.
    • Bower; Kenneth W.
    Agents
    • Cummings; Michael J.
    • Malandra, Jr.; Charles R.
    • Chaclas; Angelo N.
Abstract
An embodiment of the present invention comprises a means for holding the stack in a tilted position, the means comprising a tilted base; a sliding retainer positioned to support a side of the stack that is tilted toward the sliding retainer by the means for holding the stack in a tilted position; a first input area positioned above retainer element; a second input area positioned below the retainer element and above the means for holding the stack in a tilted position; a second input area positioned below the retainer element and above the means for holding the stack in a tilted position; and a translating carriage means attached to the means for holding the stack in a tilted position, the translating carriage means movable in an about vertical direction in response to a control signal indicating the direction of about vertical movement; whereby the apparatus is configured to selectably add mailpieces to the top of the vertical stack via the first input area or the bottom of the vertical stack via the second input area.
Description




BACKGROUND OF INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The invention disclosed herein relates generally to the field of paper handling preparation and more particularly, to a stacking apparatus.




2. Background of the Invention




Mailpiece stacking devices are known for taking singulated items and forming them into stacks or columns. Stackers are commonly used in conjunction with photocopier machines, printers, facsimile machines, mailing machines, folders, folder/sealers, small envelope inserter devices, mail openers, envelope printers and labelers. In many of these applications, such as mailing machines and envelope printers, an envelope is imprinted with an address and then immediately fed into a stacker. The ink on the envelope is often not dry as the mailpiece enters the stacker. Failure of the ink to dry enables a successive envelope to smear the ink on a previous envelope in the stacker.




In order to obtain the postal rate discounts, the order of the mailpieces that have been presorted and processed by the mail-processing machine in consecutive order needs to be maintained. The removed stack of mailpieces can be manually placed in a mail tray that is sent to the postal service. In this manner, the user can take advantage of lower postal rates that are provided to users who tray envelopes according to predetermined criteria. The predetermined criteria includes the maintaining of mailpieces in the exact order in which they were processed in the mail processing machine. Generally, the predetermined criteria relates to a reduction in the postal service's handling of the mail from the mailers. The United States Postal Service (“USPS”) offers several levels of discounts to mailers. The level of discount typically is based on the number of criteria met by the mailer. For example, in order to maximize such postage discounts, the USPS requires that high volume mailers presort the mailpieces, apply a ZIP+4 bar code to each mailpiece, and package their mail into trays with each tray tagged in accordance with the Domestic Mail Manual.




The instant invention relates to a method and apparatus for stacking documents to either the top or the bottom of the stack. Users of mailing machines, inserting equipment or other mail preparation devices often would like the flexibility of being able to add mailpieces to the bottom or the top of a mailpiece stack. Thus, some mail processing systems prefer top stacking in some applications and bottom stacking in other applications. For example mailing machine systems having bottom feeder for which top stacking is preferred in order to keep the mailpieces in their original order. Another example is an addressing system configured to print addresses from multiple data bases. Some of the databases may list the addresses in forward order, while others may list addresses in reverse order. It is generally preferred to stack the mailpieces in forward order. A system such as the present invention, with selectable top or bottom stacking, could accomplish this modification the database.




Another example of a system which could benefit from an output device which can selectably stack either on top or on the bottom of the stack is a meter/mailing machine combination capable of handling mixed sizes of mailpieces and selectably sealing the mail or not sealing it during the franking operation. Pitney Bowes” Paragon® and DM950™ are examples of such a system. Bottom stacking may be preferred when processing a consistently sized batch of mailpieces which need to be sealed. Since the weight of the stack is felt by the new mailpiece added to the bottom and the weight assists in sealing the new mailpiece as well as other mailpieces in the stack. Additionally, when the mailpieces have glossy surfaces (and are thus more prone to image smearing during the stacking operation than regular mailpieces), the customer may prefer bottom stacking to minimize the probability of image smearing. Top stacking may be preferred for mailpieces that have already been sealed, or for jobs having intermixed mailpiece sizes, in which case top stacking may be the only option which will handle the stacking function.




An additional problem with the prior art is that the stackers typically have large space requirements, for example power stackers typically have a long run length. For some customers, the relatively large space requirements for the stacker can inhibit sales and placements of the product.




Additional difficulty with the prior art is that vertical top stacking operations can create untidy stacking. This is because mailpieces drop a long distance to the top of the stack and often do not settle neatly on top of the stack. Some mailpieces settle on edge, or sometimes flip over, or the mailpieces end up sticking partially out of the stack. In general, the stacking operation requires operator vigilance and frequent unloading or manual tidying the stack to insure continuous operation.




Thus, one of the problems of the prior art is that an ink from an envelope can smear onto an adjacent envelope. Another problem is that it is desirable to maintain the ordered of the mailpieces being stacked. Another problem of the prior art is untidy stacking. Another problem of the prior art is the need for a large footprint. Another problem of the prior art is unavailability of selecting stacking sequence (via top or bottom). Therefore, a system and method for stacking envelopes is needed which provides decreased smearing, maintains mailpiece order, provides tidy stacking, provides a smaller footprint and allows operator selectability of stacking sequence.




SUMMARY OF INVENTION




This invention overcomes the disadvantages of the prior art by providing an apparatus and method for stacking mailpieces. In particular, an embodiment of the present invention is an operator selectable top or bottom stacking apparatus that arrays the stack of mailpieces in a vertical orientation, increases the stacker capacity while reducing the footprint, and improves the tidiness of the stacking when either the top or bottom stacking feature has been selected. The bottom stacking feature of this invention reduces sliding contact with other mailpieces or portions of the stacker mechanism for portions of the mailpiece that are likely to be recently imaged, thus reducing the possibility of smeared images. It enhances sealing since recently stacked mailpieces feel the weight of the stack. And it enables simple unload while running capability without operator skill and without shutting down the system in the middle of a job. The top stacking feature adds further benefits such as enabling stacking of mixed mail sizes, and it improving the tidiness and reliability of the top stacking function by maintaining a preferred minimum dropping distances for mailpieces added to the top of the stack.




An embodiment of the present invention comprises an apparatus for stacking mailpieces in a vertical stack. The apparatus includes a means for holding the stack in a tilted position, the means comprising a tilted base. A sliding retainer is positioned to support a side of the stack that is tilted toward the sliding retainer by the means for holding the stack in a tilted position. A first input area is positioned above retainer element and a second input area is positioned below the retainer element and above the means for holding the stack in a tilted position. A translating carriage means is attached to the means for holding the stack in a tilted position, the translating carriage means is movable in an approximately or about vertical direction in response to a control signal indicating the direction of about vertical movement; whereby the apparatus is configured to selectably add mailpieces to the top of the vertical stack via the first input area or the bottom of the vertical stack via the second input area. It is further contemplated that the apparatus may be tilted a predetermined magnitude.




In another embodiment, the present invention comprises a method of stacking mailpieces in a vertical stack, the method comprising: a) providing a means for holding the stack in a tilted position; b) delivering mailpieces to the top of the stack; c) detecting whether the top of the stack has reached a predetermined height; d) lowering incrementally the means for holding the stack in a tilted position to a predetermined position that will provide the means for holding the stack in a tilted position space to accept additional mailpieces. The method further comprises e) detecting whether the top of the stack has reached another predetermined height indicating that a portion of the stack has been removed from the means for holding the stack in a tilted position; and f) raising the means for holding the stack in a tilted position to a predetermined position that provides a preferred dropping distance for mailpieces that are added to the stack.




An advantage of the present invention is that it decreases image smearing, reduces stacker footprint, improves sealing, provides ordered stacking regardless of the order of the input of the elements, such as, for example, mailpieces (i.e., stacks in 1 to N order), an operator selectable top or bottom stacking apparatus that arrays the stack of mailpieces in a vertical orientation, improves the tidiness of the stacking when either the top or bottom stacking feature has been selected, enables simple unload while running capability and could be unloaded during the processing of a job, and, without shutting down the system in the middle of a job, enables stacking of mixed mail sizes, and it improves the tidiness and reliability of the top stacking function by maintaining a preferred minimum dropping distances for mailpieces added to the top of the stack. Other advantages of the invention will in part be obvious and will in part be apparent from the specification. The aforementioned advantages are illustrative of the advantages of the present invention.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS




The above and other objects and advantages of the present invention will be apparent upon consideration of the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with accompanying drawings, in which like reference characters refer to like parts throughout, and in which.





FIG. 1

is a block diagram that illustrates a computer system


100


, the use of which an embodiment of the invention may be implemented.





FIG. 2

is a block diagram schematic of a typical document inserter system.





FIG. 3

is a partial side view of an embodiment of the stacking device of the present invention configured to bottom stack and also illustrating a sliding retainer and translating carriage.





FIG. 4

is a partial side view of an embodiment of the stacking device of the present invention configured to top stack illustrating sensors used for control of the movement of the carriage.





FIG. 5



a


is a partial side view of an embodiment of the stacking device of the present invention configured to top stack, illustrating the carriage position after a stack has accumulated and the carriage has appropriately moved downward as the stack accumulates, and also illustrating sensors used for control of the movement of the carriage.





FIG. 5



b


is a partial side view of an embodiment of the stacking device of the present invention configured to top stack, illustrating the carriage position after a stack has accumulated and the carriage has appropriately moved downward as the stack accumulates, and also illustrating an angled planar surface for supporting the stack.





FIG. 5



c


is a flow chart illustrating the steps of the operation of the sensors and movement of the carriage during top stacking.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION




In describing the present invention, reference will be made herein to

FIGS. 1-5

of the drawings, in which like numerals refer to like features of the invention. Features of the invention are not necessarily shown to scale in the drawings.




Control Overview





FIG. 1

is a block diagram that illustrates a computer system


10


, the use of which an embodiment of the invention may be implemented. Computer system


10


may be a personal computer which is used generically and refers to present and future microprocessing systems with at least one processor operatively coupled to user interface means, such as a display


2


and keyboard


4


and/or a cursor control, such as a mouse or a trackball


6


, and storage media


8


. The personal computer


10


may be a workstation that is accessible by more than one user. The personal computer also includes a conventional processor


11


, such as a Pentium® microprocessor manufactured by Intel, and conventional memory devices such as hard drive


8


, floppy or CDRW drive(s)


12


, and memory


14


.




The computer system


10


can be connected to an inserter apparatus as illustrated in FIG.


2


. The control system


10


of the inserter system


40


may be the microprocessor-based personal computer system


10


described above. The computer system


10


includes appropriate memory devices


8


,


14


for storage of information such as an address database (not shown). One of ordinary skill in the art would be familiar with the general components of the inserter system with which the present invention may be implemented.




Document Inserter System Overview




The stacker apparatus


58


of the present invention may be part of a document inserter system


40


.

FIG. 2

is a schematic of a typical document inserter system


40


, generally designated


40


. In the following description, numerous paper handling stations implemented in inserter system


40


are set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the operating environment of the inserter. However it will become apparent to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without the specific details of these paper-handling stations.




As will be described in greater detail below, system


40


preferably includes an input system


44


that feeds paper sheets from a paper web or individual sheets (not shown) to an accumulating station that accumulates the sheets of paper in collation packets (not shown). In this particular example, the apparatus of the present invention provides envelope throat profile information to the control system


10


of inserter system


40


to control the opening of various sized envelopes in the mailing inserter system


40


. Alternate methods of inserting include printing the address on the insert document only and inserting such document into a window envelope which reveals the address, printing the documents in a print finishing


43


area upstream from the input system


44


of document inserter system


40


and feeding the documents directly to the input system


40


from the print finishing area


43


.




Typically, input system


44


feeds sheets in a paper path, as indicated by arrow A along a deck that is commonly called the main deck (not shown) of inserter system


40


. After sheets are accumulated into collations by input system


44


, the collations are folded in folding station


46


and the folded collations are then conveyed to a transport station


48


, preferably operative to perform buffering operations for maintaining a proper timing scheme for the processing of documents in inserter system


40


.




Each sheet collation is fed from transport station


48


to insert feeder station


50


. It is to be appreciated that a typical inserter system


40


includes a plurality of feeder stations, but for clarity of illustration only a single insert feeder


50


is shown. Insert feeder station


50


is operational to convey an insert (e.g., an advertisement, business reply envelopes, or other documents or documentation) from a supply tray to the main deck of inserter system


40


so as to be nested with the aforesaid sheet collation being conveyed along the main deck. The sheet collation, along with the nested insert(s), are next conveyed into an envelope insertion station


52


that is operative to insert the collation into an envelope. The envelope is conveyed to the printer station


56


where appropriate printing such as addressee information and/or postal indicia is applied on an exterior surface of the envelope. Finally, the envelope is conveyed to stacker apparatus


58


that stacks the envelopes in accordance with the present invention.




The use of the document inserter system


40


, such as, for example, a Series 9 Inserter Systems manufactured by Pitney Bowes Inc. of Stamford, Conn., is well known. Such document inserter systems are used by organizations (e.g., banking institutions, utility companies, insurance companies, credit companies, and the like) for assembling large amounts of outgoing mailpieces for dispatch through the postal system. Typically, such organizations create documents, such as billing documents in a computer such as a mainframe computer system (not shown) that is separate from the document inserter system


40


that will process the documents into such mailpieces.




Stacker Apparatus




The stacking apparatus


58


of the present invention is configured to selectably stack from either the top or the bottom of the stack and is capable of handling mixed sizes of mailpieces. Bottom stacking may be preferred when processing a consistently sized batch of mailpieces which need to be sealed, since the bottom stacker


58


enhances sealing by ensuring that the weight of the stack is felt by each new mailpiece as it is added to the bottom of the stack. Additionally, when the mailpieces have glossy surfaces (and are thus more prone to image smearing during the stacking operation than are regular mailpieces), the user or operator may prefer bottom stacking to minimize the probability of image smearing. Top stacking may be preferred for mailpieces that have already been sealed (in which case the sealing enhancement feature of bottom stacking is not needed), or top stacking may be preferred for mail creation jobs having intermixed mailpiece sizes (in which case top stacking may be the only option which could handle the stacking function).





FIG. 3

is a partial side view of an embodiment of the stacking device of the present invention configured to bottom stack and also illustrating a sliding retainer and translating carriage. The stacking mechanism is positioned such that input area


232


is positioned below the retainer element and above the means for holding the stack in a tilted position. For bottom stacking two intermittently rotating S-elements


201


,


102


, at least one stack guide element


103


and appropriate drive elements (not shown) rotate the rotating S-elements. Further, means are included to move one of the two rotating S-elements


201


into a position consistent with the size of the mailpieces to be stacked while leaving the second rotating S-element


102


fixed. This operation can be automated with the use of appropriate sensors and drive elements. Alternatively, this operation may be manual.





FIG. 4

is a partial side view of an embodiment of the stacking device of the present invention configured to top stack, also illustrating sensors used for control of the movement of the carriage.

FIG. 4

illustrates the position of the carriage


202


for receiving first mailpiece


107


to be stacked on top of the S-elements, which are configured for holding the stack in a tilted position. The carriage


202


is positioned below input area


232


in order to receive mailpieces


107


on top of the stack. The embodiment comprises a carriage


202


and lead screw elements


205


. In this arrangement, the S-elements


102


and


201


, associated drives (not shown), and the sliding retainer element


103


are mounted on a translating carriage


202


, which is capable of being driven in a slightly off-vertical direction by a lead screw


205


activated by a lead screw motor


206


. The lead screw


205


, motor


206


, and associated bearings and drives are suitably mounted to fixed frame


208


. For bottom stacking operation, the carriage


202


is first positioned so that individual mailpieces


107


enter the stacker


58


just above the shelf areas of the S-elements. Thereafter, the carriage


202


and lead screw


205


remain substantially stationary while stacker


58


is in operation. The S-elements


102


and


201


rotate, for example, up to 180 degrees after each mailpiece


107


enters, thus lifting the individual mailpiece


107


to the bottom of the stack. The stack grows in an approximately vertical direction as more mailpieces are added to the stack. Note that the S-element


201


of the present embodiment is larger than the S-element


102


. The differently sized S-elements create a slight tilt of the stack against the sliding retainer element


103


to help support of tall stacks. Alternately, the two S-elements could be the same size, and the frame could be tipped further in order to tilt the stack. The sliding retainer element


103


(shown in

FIG. 3

with an elongated vertical element roughly equal to the maximum stack height) rests on the top of the stack and assists in sealing and in keeping the stacked mailpieces tidy as the stack grows in the approximately vertical direction.




Note the mailpiece input position


207


in

FIG. 4

remains at the same location as shown in

FIGS. 3 and 5

(described herein).

FIG. 4

is a partial side view of an embodiment of the stacking device of the present invention configured to top stack illustrating sensors used for control of the movement of the carriage.

FIG. 4

illustrates the carriage


202


repositioned down, for example, a few inches from the position shown in

FIG. 3

, to a position suitable for the beginning of top stacking operation. For the top stacking operation of the present embodiment, the S-elements


102


and


201


do not rotate, and the mailpieces are stacked on top of the S-elements


102


,


201


and the sliding retainer


103


. As the stack grows with repeated stacking of new mailpieces, the carriage


202


moves downward to keep a relatively constant drop distance for the new mailpieces.





FIG. 5



a


is a partial side view of an embodiment of the stacking device of the present invention configured to top stack, illustrating the carriage position after a stack has accumulated and the carriage has appropriately moved downward as the stack accumulates. In the embodiment of

FIG. 5

, two sensor systems are used to control the position of the carriage


202


to help the top of the stack remain in the preferred position of 1 to 2 inches below the mailpiece input position during active top stacking operation. The sensor scheme illustrated in this embodiment is not meant to be limiting; other sensor schemes as may be determined by one of ordinary skill in the art can also accomplish the sensing function. The sensor arrangement of the present embodiment comprises a first optical sensor


211


and first rotating flag


210


which operate to determine when the mailpieces in the stack have accumulated to a predetermined height. As is further illustrated in

FIG. 5



a


, a second flag


212


and second optical sensor


213


are positioned to detect when an operator has removed a portion of the stack


106


.





FIG. 5



b


is a partial side view of an alternate embodiment of the stacking device of the present invention configured to top stack, illustrating the carriage


202


position after a stack


106


has accumulated and the carriage


202


has appropriately moved downward as the stack


106


accumulates and also illustrating an angled planar surface


222


for supporting the stack. As is shown in

FIG. 5



b


, the planar surface


222


is inclined toward the translating carriage means. The incline is achieved by configuring a first side


222




a


of the planar surface


222


at a height greater than the height of a second side


222




b


of the planar surface


222




a


.

FIG. 5



b


also illustrates that carriage may be moved such that the input location remains constant whether a top stacker or bottom stacker is used. Alternatively, as will be apparent to one skilled in the art in view of

FIG. 5



b


, two separate input areas may be used with the present invention.





FIG. 5



c


is a flow chart illustrating the steps of the operation of the sensors and movement of the carriage during top stacking. At step S


100


, the method begins. At step S


102


, a mailpiece is added to the top of the stack. At step S


104


, a query is made as to whether the edge of the stack has caused the first flag


210


to rotate and break the beam of the first optical sensor


211


. If the answer to the query of step S


104


is yes, meaning that the edge of the stack has caused the flag


210


to rotate and thus break the optical sensor


211


beam, then at step S


106


the carriage


202


is lowered. The lowering of the carriage for step S


106


takes place when the optical sensor


211


beam is broken, and a signal is made (by control system


10


) to the lead screw drive motor


206


to rotate the lead screw


205


to drop the carriage


202


by a suitable amount (preferably about 1 inch) to make space for additional mailpieces to be added to the top of the stack. If the answer to the query of step S


104


is no, then steps S


102


through S


104


are repeated as described above.




Following step S


106


, at step S


108


a query is made as to whether the operator has removed a portion of the stack


106


and the second flag


212


has rotated and triggered the second sensor


213


. During the stacking operation the carriage


202


appropriately moves downward in small increments or steps as the stack


106


accumulates. First flag


212


is typically in contact with the edge of the stack


106


during normal stacking operation, and in that contact position, it breaks the beam of second sensor


213


. When the operator removes a portion of the stack


106


, as in step S


108


(when the answer to the query is yes), the drop distance for new mailpieces


107


is greater than the preferred 1 to 2 inches. The second flag


212


works with the second sensor


213


to detect that the operator has removed a portion of the stack


106


by pivoting to the dashed position


212


B, and exposing the optical beam of sensor


213


. Next at step S


110


the carriage is raised. The method of raising the carriage is preferably performed by the sensor sending a signal to control system


10


to cause lead screw motor


206


to operate in reverse and drive the carriage


202


in an upward direction until the remaining stack


106


, or a feature on the carriage


202


(not shown) engages the flag


212


and rotates the flag


212


to block the optical beam


213


again, at which time the carriage


202


motion stops and the top of the stack


106


is in position to receive additional mailpieces with a minimal drop distance. Note this same sensor is used to position the carriage


202


back to a position just below the mailpiece input position


207


(as shown in

FIG. 4

) after the mail creation/stacking job is completed and the operator removes all mailpieces from the stacker. In this embodiment, it is a feature on the carriage


202


(and not the stacked mailpieces


106


) that engages the flag


212


and positions it to break the beam of second sensor


213


. At step S


112


, the method ends.




The embodiments described herein can provide the advantages such as decreased image smearing, reduced stacker footprint, improved sealing, ordered stacking, operator selectable top or bottom stacking, unloading while running capability, stacking of mixed mail sizes and tidiness and reliability of the top stacking function. While the present invention has been disclosed and described with reference to a various embodiments thereof, it will be apparent, as noted above, that variations and modifications may be made therein. It is, thus, intended in the following claims to cover each variation and modification that falls within the true spirit and scope of the present invention.



Claims
  • 1. An apparatus for stacking material pieces in a vertical stack, the apparatus comprising:a means for holding the stack in a tilted position; a sliding retainer positioned to support a side of the stack that is tilted toward the sliding retainer by the means for holding the stack in a tilted position; a first input area positioned above the stack; a second input area positioned below the stack; and a translating carriage means attached to the means for holding the stack in a tilted position, the translating carriage means movable in an about vertical direction in response to a control signal indicating the direction of about vertical movement; whereby the apparatus is configured to selectably add material pieces to the top of the vertical stack via the first input area or the bottom of the vertical stack via the second input area.
  • 2. The apparatus as claimed in claim 1 wherein the control signal indicating the direction of the about vertical movement of the translating carriage means is the result of data provided by first and second sensors positioned in an area of the apparatus suitable for detecting desired stack height.
  • 3. The apparatus as claimed in claim 2 wherein the first sensor operates to determine whether the carriage needs to be moved in an about vertical downward direction in order to make room for additional material pieces on the top of the stack.
  • 4. The apparatus as claimed in claim 2 wherein the second sensor operates to determine whether the carriage needs to be moved in an about vertical direction upward in order to position the means for holding the stack to receive additional material pieces with a minimal drop distance from the first input position.
  • 5. The apparatus as claimed in claim 1 wherein the means for holding the stack in a tilted position comprises a first S element of a first diameter and a second s element of a second diameter, the second diameter larger than the first diameter and the first s element position proximately to the translating carriage means, the second s element positioned distally to the translating carriage means, whereby the size and positioning of the first and second S-elements causes a tilt of the means for holding the stack in a tilted position toward the translating carriage means.
  • 6. The apparatus as claimed in claim 1 wherein the means for holding the stack in a tilted position comprises a planar surface with an incline sloped toward the translating carriage means.
  • 7. The apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein the apparatus is tilted a predetermined magnitude.
US Referenced Citations (5)
Number Name Date Kind
4997337 Trimble Mar 1991 A
5562399 Schulz Oct 1996 A
5709525 Marzullo et al. Jan 1998 A
20010054790 Ikeda Dec 2001 A1
20030184011 Schaareman et al. Oct 2003 A1