Patent Grant
10987630
This disclosure relates to separation methods and apparatuses, and more particularly to electrodeionization of liquid streams.
Numerous separation methods are known in the art. However, many separation methods, such as distillation and electrodialysis, can be very expensive, particularly when they require a phase change of the material to be separated, such as in distillation. Further, available separation methods are largely unsuitable for separating components in an acidic environment, and are particularly poorly suited for separating organic acids from one another.
Accordingly, improved methods and apparatuses for separating components in acidic environments are needed.
In one aspect, an electrodeionization apparatus is provided which includes: an anode; a spaced apart cathode; three spaced apart membranes located between the anode and the cathode and comprising a first cation exchange membrane, a first anion exchange membrane, and a second cation exchange membrane defining fluid flow passages therebetween, including: a) a first electrode rinse passage between the anode and the first cation exchange membrane, b) a first concentrate passage between the first cation exchange membrane and the first anion exchange membrane, c) a feed stream passage located between the first anion exchange membrane and the second cation exchange membrane, d) a second electrode rinse passage between the second cation exchange membrane and the cathode; and at least one propionate-selective ion exchange resin wafer located transverse to the fluid flow within the feed stream passage and comprising a macroporous sulfonated or aminated aromatic resin.
In another aspect, a system is provided including: a reactor system configured to produce a product stream comprising acetic acid and propionic acid; an electrodeionization system configured to separate propionic acid from acetic acid, the electrodeionization system including: an anode; a spaced apart cathode; three spaced apart membranes located between the anode and the cathode and comprising a first cation exchange membrane, a first anion exchange membrane, and a second cation exchange membrane defining fluid flow passages therebetween, including: a) a first electrode rinse passage between the anode and the first cation exchange membrane, b) a first concentrate passage between the first cation exchange membrane and the first anion exchange membrane, c) a feed stream passage located between the first anion exchange membrane and the second cation exchange membrane, d) a second electrode rinse passage between the second cation exchange membrane and the cathode; and at least one propionate-selective ion exchange resin wafer located transverse to the fluid flow within the feed stream passage and comprising a macroporous sulfonated or aminated aromatic resin.
In another aspect, a method is provided including the steps of: providing at least one feed stream comprising acetic acid and propionic acid, at least two electrode rinse streams, at least one diluent stream to an electrodeionization system configured to separate propionic acid from acetic acid, the electrodeionization system including: an anode; a spaced apart cathode; three spaced apart membranes located between the anode and the cathode and comprising a first cation exchange membrane, a first anion exchange membrane, and a second cation exchange membrane defining fluid flow passages therebetween, including: a) a first electrode rinse passage between the anode and the first cation exchange membrane, b) a first concentrate passage between the first cation exchange membrane and the first anion exchange membrane, c) a feed stream passage located between the first anion exchange membrane and the second cation exchange membrane, d) a second electrode rinse passage between the second cation exchange membrane and the cathode; and at least one propionate-selective ion exchange resin wafer located transverse to the fluid flow within the feed stream passage and comprising a macroporous sulfonated or aminated aromatic resin; providing an electric potential across the anode and the cathode; and collecting a purified acetic acid stream from the at least one feed stream passage.
The following figures illustrate embodiments of the subject matter disclosed herein. The claimed subject matter may be understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying figures, in which like reference numerals identify like elements, and in which:
Unless explicitly stated otherwise in defined circumstances, all percentages, parts, ratios, and like amounts used herein are defined by weight.
Further, in this connection, certain features of the process, apparatus, or system according to this disclosure which are, for clarity, described herein in the context of separate embodiments, may also be provided in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features of the process, apparatus, or system according to this disclosure that are, for brevity, described in the context of a single embodiment, may also be provided separately or in any sub-combination.
When describing a range of dimensions, concentrations, pKas, and the like, it is the Applicant's intent to disclose every individual number that such a range could reasonably encompass, for example, every individual number that has at least one more significant figure than in the disclosed end points of the range. As an example, when referring to a pKa as between 2 and 3, it is intended to disclose that the pKa can be 2, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4, 2.5, 2.6, 2.7, 2.8, 2.9, or 3.0, including any subranges or combinations of subranges encompassed in this broader range. Applicant's intent is that these two methods of describing the range are interchangeable. Moreover, when a range of values is disclosed or claimed, Applicant also intends for the disclosure of a range to reflect, and be interchangeable with, disclosing any and all sub-ranges and combinations of sub-ranges encompassed therein. Accordingly, Applicant reserves the right to proviso out or exclude any individual members of any such group, including any sub-ranges or combinations of sub-ranges within the group, or any selection, feature, range, element, or aspect that can be claimed, if for any reason Applicant chooses to claim less than the full measure of the disclosure, for example, to account for a reference that Applicant may be unaware of at the time of the filing of the application. In addition, the ranges set forth herein include their endpoints unless expressly stated otherwise.
The term “about” means that amounts, sizes, formulations, parameters, and other quantities and characteristics are not and need not be exact, but may be approximate and/or larger or smaller, as desired, reflecting tolerances, conversion factors, rounding off, measurement error and the like, and other factors known to those of skill in the art. In general, an amount, size, formulation, parameter or other quantity or characteristic is “about” or “approximate” whether or not expressly stated to be such. The term “about” also encompasses amounts that differ due to different equilibrium conditions for a composition resulting from a particular initial mixture. Whether or not modified by the term “about”, the claims include equivalents to the quantities. The term “about” may mean within 10% of the reported numerical value, preferably within 5% of the reported numerical value.
As used herein, “macroporous” is used broadly to refer to materials having an average pore diameter of from about 10 nm to about 100 microns, for example from about 10 nm to about 5 microns.
In some aspects, apparatuses and methods for separating propionic acid from glacial acetic acid are provided. Glacial acetic acid has low water activity, which typically makes it a poor target for charge-based separation processes. However, electrodeionization methods, systems, and apparatuses for separating propionic acid from acetic acid have surprisingly been found to be effective.
In some aspects, an electrodeionization apparatus is provided which includes an anode, a spaced apart cathode, and three spaced apart membranes between the anode and the cathode. In some embodiments, these membranes include a first cation exchange membrane, a first anion exchange membrane, and a second cation exchange membrane, which each define fluid flow passages between them.
For example, in some embodiments, a first electrode rinse passage is formed between the anode and the first cation exchange membrane. An inert substance, such as water, may flow through the first electrode rinse passage, to assist in removing any buildup from the anode. Similarly, in some embodiments, a second electrode rinse passage is formed between the second cation exchange membrane and the cathode. An inert substance, such as water, may flow through the second electrode rinse passage, to assist in removing any buildup from the cathode.
In some embodiments, a feed stream passage is formed between the first anion exchange membrane and the second cation exchange membrane. In use, a feed stream which includes acetic acid and propionic acid may be transferred to the feed stream passage. In some embodiments, the feed stream is the product stream of a reactor system which is configured to produce a product stream comprising acetic acid and propionic acid. For example, in some embodiments, the reactor system may be used for acetyl manufacturing.
In use, the cation exchange membrane may allow hydroxide to pass from the cathode, through the cation exchange membrane. In use, the anion exchange membrane may allow propionate and acetate ions to pass from the feed stream passage and through the anion exchange membrane.
In some aspects, the feed stream which can be separated by electrodeionization according to this disclosure may include from about 200 ppm to about 100,000 ppm of propionic acid. In some embodiments, the feed stream may include from about 200 ppm to about 1000 ppm of propionic acid, from about 1000 ppm to about 10,000 ppm propionic acid or from about 10,000 ppm to about 100,000 ppm propionic acid, and any ranges therebetween. In some embodiments, the feed stream may have a pKa of from about 2 to about 6, for example, about 2, about 2.5, about 3, about 3.5, about 4, about 4.5, about 5, about 5.5, about 6, or any ranges therebetween. In some embodiments, the feed stream may be entirely non-aqueous.
In some embodiments, one or more propionate-selective ion exchange resin wafers are positioned in the feed stream passage transverse to the fluid flow within the feed stream passage. The one or more propionate-selective ion exchange resin wafers may include a macroporous sulfonated or aminated aromatic resin. In use, the one or more propionate-selective ion exchange resin wafers may promote the selective separation or transfer of propionate ions from the feed stream.
In some embodiments, a purified acetic acid stream can be collected from the at least one feed stream passage. That is, in use, the propionate-selective ion exchange resin wafers and cation and anion exchange membranes function to separate propionate and propionic acid from the feed stream, so that the stream collected from the feed stream passage is a purified acetic acid stream. For example, in some embodiments the purified acetic acid stream can include less than about 500 ppm of propionic acid, for example less than about 500 ppm, less than about 400 ppm, less than about 300 ppm, less than about 200 ppm, less than about 100 ppm, less than about 50 ppm, less than about 20 ppm, less than about 10 ppm, or any ranges therebetween.
In some embodiments, a first concentrate passage is formed between the first cation exchange membrane and the first anion exchange membrane. In some aspects, the electrodeionization apparatus further includes a second anion exchange membrane between the first cation exchange membrane and the first anion exchange membrane, defining a second concentrate passage between the first anion exchange membrane and the second anion exchange membrane.
In some embodiments, one or more acetate-selective ion exchange resin wafers are positioned in the second concentrate stream passage transverse to the fluid flow within the second concentrate passage. The one or more acetate-selective ion exchange resin wafers may include a macroporous sulfonated or aminated aromatic resin. In use, the one or more acetate-selective ion exchange resin wafers may promote the selective separation or transfer of acetate ions from the second concentrate stream passage.
The one or more propionate-selective or acetate-selective ion exchange resin wafers may include Amberlite® IR 120 Na+, a sulfonated aromatic resin, or Amberlyst® A21, an aminated aromatic resin. In some embodiments, the one or more macroporous propionate-selective ion exchange resin wafer further includes a non-ionic aromatic resin or a basic aromatic resin. In some embodiments, the non-ionic aromatic resin may include a cross-linked divinyl-benzene polymer and/or the basic aromatic resin comprises a dialkylamine-modified divinyl-benzene-styrene copolymer. In some embodiments, the non-ionic aromatic resin may include Amberlite® XAD-4, and the basic aromatic resin may include Amberlyst® A-21. The Amberlyst® and Amberlite® materials are available from Rohm & Haas, Philadelphia, Pa.
In some embodiments, the propionate-selective ion exchange resin wafer may have a propionic acid to acetic acid selectivity of from about 10 to about 16. For example, about 10, about 11, about 12, about 13, about 14, about 15, about 16, or any ranges therebetween.
In some embodiments, these membranes are acid-resistant. For example, in some embodiments, one or more of the cation exchange membranes and anion exchange membranes may be stable in a solution of acetic acid for at least 30 minutes, at least 1 hour, at least 2 hours, at least 3 hours, at least 4 hours, at least 5 hours, at least 6 hours, at least 7 hours, at least 8 hours, at least 9 hours, or at least 10 hours. That is, when used in an electrodeionization system as described herein, one or more of the cation exchange membranes and anion exchange membranes may not develop any leaks for at least 30 minutes, at least 1 hour, at least 2 hours, at least 3 hours, at least 4 hours, at least 5 hours, at least 6 hours, at least 7 hours, at least 8 hours, at least 9 hours, or at least 10 hours of electrodeionization.
In some embodiments, the one or more cation exchange membranes and one or more anion exchange membranes may include A7001, Fumasep® FAB, Ralex® AMH-PAD, Ralex® AMH-PES, or any combination thereof. In some embodiments, the one or more cation exchange membranes and one or more anion exchange membranes may include Fumasep® FKM, Fumasep® F930, Fumasep® F-10150-PF, Ralex® CMH-PAD, Ralex® CMH-PES, Ralex® CM-PP, or any combinations thereof. In some embodiments, the one or more anion exchange membrane may include Fumasep® FAM, Fumasep® FAP-450, Fumasep® FAPQ-PP-375, Ralex® AMH-PAD, Ralex® AMH-PES, Ralex® AM-PP, or any combinations thereof. The Fumasep® materials are available from Fumatech BWT GmbH, Bietigheim-Bissingen, Germany. The Ralex® materials are available from Mega A.S., Prague, Czech Republic.
In some embodiments, the one or more anion exchange membranes, and the one or more cation exchange membranes may have a thickness of from about 0.01 to about 1 millimeter, alternatively from about 0.05 mm to about 0.3 mm, from about 0.2 mm to about 0.7 mm. For example about 0.01 mm, about 0.05 mm, about 0.1 mm, about 0.2 mm, about 0.3 mm, about 0.4 mm, about 0.5 mm, about 0.6 mm, about 0.7 mm, about 0.8 mm, about 0.9 mm, about 1.0 mm, and any ranges therebetween.
In use, a feed stream including acetic acid and propionic acid may be provided to the feed stream passage 115 while an electric potential is created between the anode 101 and cathode 103. Simultaneously, an electrode rinse may be provided to the first and second electrode rinse passages 111, 117, and a stream including propionic acid may be provided to the first concentrate passage 113. The propionate-selective ion-exchange resin wafers 119 promote the creation of propionate (Pr−) ions, which then navigate through the first anion exchange membrane 109 out of the feed stream passage 115 and into the first concentrate passage 113. At the same time, these resins may also create some acetate (Ac−) ions, which may similarly pass through the first anion exchange membrane 109 out of the feed stream passage 115 and into the first concentrate passage 113. In this way, a purified stream of acetic acid is created in the feed stream passage 115.
In use, a feed stream including acetic acid and propionic acid may be provided to the feed stream passage 217 while an electric potential is created between the anode 201 and cathode 203. Simultaneously, an electrode rinse may be provided to the first and second electrode rinse passages 213, 215, a stream including acetic acid may be provided to the first concentrate passage 219, and a stream including propionic acid may be provided to the second concentrate passage 221. The propionate-selective ion-exchange resin wafers 223 promote the creation of Pr− ions, which then navigate through the first anion exchange membrane 209 out of the feed stream passage 217 and into the second concentrate passage 221. At the same time, these resins may also create some Ac− ions, which may similarly pass through the first anion exchange membrane 209 out of the feed stream passage 217 and into the second concentrate passage 221. In this way, a purified stream of acetic acid is created in the feed stream passage 217. Further, the acetate-selective resin wafers 223 may promote the creation of Ac− ions, which may pass into the first concentrate passage 219. In this way, a stream of dilute acetic acid may be created in the first concentrate passage 219 and a stream of dilute propionic acid may be created in the second concentrate passage 221.
The present disclosure is further illustrated by the following examples, which are not to be construed in any way as imposing limitations upon the scope thereof. On the contrary, it is to be clearly understood that resort may be had to various other aspects, embodiments, modifications, and equivalents thereof which, after reading the description herein, may suggest themselves to one of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit of the present invention or the scope of the appended claims. Thus, other aspects of this invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed herein.
Mixtures of an anionic exchange resin, a cationic exchange resin, sucrose, and polyethylene were prepared with weight ratios of about 23:23:15:10, placed in a cast and placed in a hydraulic press at a pressure of 10,000 psi at 237° F. for 90 minutes. A custom iron cast was used to prepare the resin wafers. This cast is shown in
Each of these wafers were first soaked in water for 24 hours. This dissolved the sucrose, for those resins which contained sucrose, making the wafers macroporous. Next, each of these wafers was soaked in acetic acid to activate the wafers.
Next, several of the wafers prepared in Example 1 were installed into electrodeionization (EDI) cells to test the maximum selectivity of each wafer under various conditions, in a glass EDI cell and a micro flow EDI cell. The glass cell contained about 50 mL of liquid on each side of a membrane and allowed one ion-either hydrogen ions or acetate ions—to pass through. The micro flow cell allowed multiple wafers and multiple membranes, so both hydrogen and acetate ions could be removed. The glass EDI cell is shown in
Each of the wafers was placed in an EDI cell between two ion exchange membranes, and a voltage was applied. A feed stream including both propionic acid and acetic acid was provided to the EDI cell, and the maximum selectivity was calculated according to the following formula, wherein Prin is the initial concentration of propionic acid in the feed stream, Prf is the final propionic acid concentration in the product stream, Acin is the initial concentration of acetic acid in the feed stream, Acr is the final acetic acid concentration in the product stream.
The voltage applied to the EDI cell, the membrane type used, the concentration of the feed stream, and the maximum selectivity are shown in Table 2 below. Samples were collected and analyzed using HPLC, GC, a pH meter, and a conductivity probe meter throughout the experiment.
During these experiments, it was noted that the acetic acid flow caused significant deformation in the microflow EDI cell for Viton gaskets and swelling of EPDM gaskets. Accordingly, new PTFE gaskets were used for all of the testing. Initially, Neosepta® AMX and CMX membranes were selected and tested for this microflow cell, but after several runs, deformations were noted in these membranes. Similarly, evaluation of Fumasep® membrane performance showed that, while these membranes suffered from less deformation, they were not very acid resistant and, over time, started to leak acid from the dilute stream into the concentrate stream. While not intending to be bound by theory, it is believed that the acid etched microchannels or paths through the membranes, without causing structural damage.
The Neosepta® AMX/CMX membranes showed that in 1 hour, they were able to purify acetic acid, reducing the original propionic acid concentration from 600 ppm to 382 ppm after one hour, and further reducing propionic acid concentration to 345 ppm after four hours. The selectivity over this period of time began at about 5 but was reduced to about 1 by the end of the experiment.
A7001 and C7000 membrane materials were much more acid-resistant, but propionate ion transfer was significantly lower than that achieved with the Neosepta® membranes. The A7001 and C7000 materials are available from Membrane International, Inc., Ringwood, N.J. The Neosepta® materials are available from Astom Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
In each of the tests described above, the acid-resistance of the membranes was evaluated. The stability or acid-resistance was evaluated by determining the point at which the membrane started physically leaking and the test could not continue. The results of these tests are shown below in Table 3.
As an alternative to the propionate-selective ion-exchange wafers described above, propionate-selective ion-exchange wafers were prepared using polystyrene rather than polyethylene. While not intending to be bound by theory, it is believed that polystyrene is more stable than polyethylene in acidic conditions. Three different wafers were prepared, as shown in Table 4 below:
These wafers were then inserted into a micro flow cell, as shown in
As can be seen from these selectivity tests, the polystyrene wafer (wafer No. 173) is less selective than the polyethylene wafers. However, its selectivity was more stable, suggesting that polystyrene may be more long-lived in these acidic environments than polyethylene. Specifically, after 8 hours wafer no. 141 showed a 76% decrease in selectivity, and wafer no. 143, which was a 6-month-old wafer, showed an 81% decrease in selectivity, while wafer 173—the polystyrene wafer—showed only a 52% decrease in selectivity.
The present disclosure is described above with reference to numerous aspects and embodiments, and specific examples. Equivalents and certain variations of the disclosed embodiments will suggest themselves to those skilled in the art in light of the above detailed description, which are within the intended scope of the appended claims.
This application claims the benefit of priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/637,841 filed on Mar. 2, 2018, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20100133115 | Gifford | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20110180477 | Ganzi | Jul 2011 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 102935333 | Dec 2014 | CN |
| 9820972 | May 1998 | WO |
| 2008112253 | Sep 2008 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Huang et al., Application of Electrodialysis to the Production of Organic Acids: State-of-The-Art and Recent Developments, Journal of Membrane Sci., Elsevier BV, NL, vol. 288, No. 1-2, Feb. 3, 2007, pp. 1-12, XP005872372, ISSN:0376-7388, DOI:10.1016/J. MEMSCI. 2006.11.026. |
| Erhard Hoffmann et al., Recent Advances in Application of Electrodialysis with Bipolar Membranes for Organic Acid Recovery from Fermentation Broth, Current Organic Chemistry, vol. 20, No. 26, Oct. 7, 2016, pp. 2753-2761, XP055592909, NL ISSN:1385-2728, DOI:10.2174/1385272820666160513151103 3.2 Influence of Current Density. |
| Özgür Arar et al., Various Applications of Electrodeionization (EDI) Method for Water Treatment—A Short Review, Desalination, Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 342, Mar. 4, 2014, pp. 16-22, XP028847168, ISSN:0011-9164, DOI:10.1016/J. DESAL.2014.01.028 section 4.3. |
| The International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2019/020048 dated Jun. 24, 2019. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20190270050 A1 | Sep 2019 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62637841 | Mar 2018 | US |
