This invention is made by a sole inventor without any sponsorship of government funds.
This is an original filing of a regular utility patent application.
This field of the invention relates generally to marine craft, and more particularly to low resistance hull technology which adds speed and safety for racing. The invention provides an improved passage time and fuel savings in shipping as well. More specifically, the field of this invention relates to a radical departure in hull design together with running rigging, sails, spars, and mast and bow rudder improvements. In short, this invention teaches that many of the rigging connections that are fixed in position for a conventional sail boat are movable for the VC racer. The new hull profile alone—or in combination with the other novel improvements hereof—provides non obvious features well advanced over the known prior art.
Set out below are brief descriptions of certain relevant terms which further the understanding of the invention. These terms provide a basis for a detailed teaching of the improvements of this invention in the relevant arts. Such terms are not intended to replace the claims but rather serve as helpful guides in understanding our novel improvements in these arts.
Reverse Curvature.
The hull design for this invention includes a concave or “hollow” shape monohull on a marine craft having a symmetrical deck rail. The hull has a reverse curvature running from a flat straight keel to the deck rail and also encompassing the entire hull length from the bow to the stern of the hull. While a generalized concave hull shape may arguably be known—it is only present is some limited foremost portions of certain prior art hulls.
This invention features a sharp pointed bow and a deep flat keel having a reverse V curvature hull with an area of maximum constriction for guiding a water column along the wetted surface of the craft. This reverse V curvature, covers the hull surface from the flat keel to the rail where the maximum constriction collects water from above and below for movement along the hull free from significant water disruption.
Collection and Dispersion Laminar Flow
The deep VC monohull of the invention differs from conventional hydroplaning approaches in that rather than trying to force water underneath the hull—or spread the water in curled waves away from the hull—this concave hull invention strives to collect the water in a column along a direct line along the entire wetted hull surface. That direct line is below the waterline from bow to stern at an area defined by a series of points of maximum arc constriction.
The term “collection” is the function provided by the reverse or concave VC curvature; while, “dispersion” by “laminar flow” is the function of moving the water, with minimum disturbance, along the entire wetted hull surface with a minimum drag coefficient. The end result is a high speed craft with a deep V monohull exhibiting a reduced drag coefficient that allows the speed and stability limits to be pushed higher than those achieved by the prior art. A reduced amount of fuel consumption and enhanced performance are direct results from this novel invention.
Pinched
“Collection and laminar flow” is my newly introduced technology applying to a hull being concave from the keel to the rail and all other faired surfaces in contact with the water. These concave changes are often referred to in the marine art as “pinched.” Pinched as used herein means gradually squeezed down and it will become more readily apparent from further description in connection with certain selected station locations in the Drawing as described further hereinafter.
Hull Characteristics
The inventive keel is flat. A non rocker keel, at first blush, may seem out of place for a high speed racer until one is exposed to the above-mentioned teaching of “collection and laminar flow” wherein the concept for a deep, flat keel VC hull is to avoid water disruption as much as possible. A knife edge bow and stern and keel-to-rail slightly V concave hull surface achieves less disruption in the water than those of the prior art discussed herein.
Bow Rudder
Since my knife edge profile hull design tends to favor straight line movement, I have invented an improved bow rudder with a pivot taking the form of a full draft matching column-and-socket relationship. This bow rudder is located just in front of the hull's most forward watertight bulkhead, and is shaped as though it were a forward portion of the overall hull profile. In a side view the leading edge of my novel bow rudder is kicked back five degrees (almost vertically parallel) to the forward perpendicular of the hull. Port to starboard pivot movements of about 13 degrees each direction (as per
Wakes and water disruption are generally conceded to be the major limiting factors in hull design for marine craft of all types. Concave hull forms for a forward hull portion are arguably known, but they are primarily limited to partial sections of the hull on most marine craft. Sailing ships have generally been characterized by convex surfaces from the handrail to the keel. Also, most hulls have a rocker-shaped keel. The prior art hull designs promote wave movement away from or under the craft and result in extreme water turbulence.
For the above-mentioned reasons, the general direction of the prior art is to turn to various flat bottom approaches directed toward hydroplaning and/or multi hull approaches. A limited prior art search has turned up some art and articles of interest that is listed hereinafter. Copies of such art are submitted herewith.
Certain art known to the inventor by a search includes the following:
A detailed description of each of the above-noted art/articles is not believed to be warranted. Instead, we shall summarize the above noted patents and publications together as a group. Such art generally teaches the concept of throwing the water away or forcing the water down and under the craft. Prior art wave generating approaches cause the stern to sink and the craft generally moves uphill in the water. Severe waves are created by the structures set out in this art. In one specific reference, waves are deliberately created to try to nullify the inevitable waves associated with these approaches.
In addition, most of the art noted above has either convex and/or multi-hull catamaran or pentamaran type structures. In any event, however, the novel features of the invention are not disclosed or suggested.
In conclusion, what has not yet been provided, in order to fill a long sought for need, is an essentially wave free craft with a hull shape and novel improvements in running rigging, sails, spars, mast and rudder technology. The new hull and the other novel improvements of this invention provide non obvious features well advanced over the known prior art.
My invention involves a very deep concave V hull of smooth continuous reverse curvature shape. This new and improved hull shape runs the full length from the bow to stern and from a flat keel to the rail symmetrically on both sides of the monohull craft. I refer to my invention as a VC racer. It shows promise, however, to chine and turn of the bilge hulls for larger ships.
My novel hull shape favors a straight line movement pattern. For steering purposes I have provided a bow rudder which is formed as though it were a continuation of the novel hull shape. My bow rudder is pivoted along the extreme forward most portions of the craft and directly in front of the foremost bulkhead. The pivoting bow rudder of the invention swivels within stopped limits either to starboard or port, and is employed, together with a stern rudder, for steering this deep VC sailboat or ship.
Also lying along the longitudinal axis for the craft are a transversely moveable mast base and a moveable mizzen shroud. Both are moveable within limits to promote sail tack changes and to adjust sail proximity relationships between the two sails. Additionally, my mizzen headsail has a boom that reaches all the way back to the aft end of the mainsail boom.
My invention with this extra long mizzen boom is tacked by moving the mast windward and detaching the mizzen shroud. Once detached the shroud and boom are winched sufficiently forward toward the bow that my long mizzen boom will clear the mast. When clear, the mizzen sail is moved leeward to the opposite side of the craft. The mizzen shroud also, like the mast, moves port and starboard to facilitate slot adjustment or sail proximity relationship changes with the mainsail. Such transverse shifts allow this and similar sail changes to take place safely and with a minimum of interruption in sailing maneuvers.
The novel features of the disclosed invention provide many unusual benefits. Achieved by this invention are some of the following features and benefits:
Bulbous ballast 300 may be of any suitable type typically known in the art. In my invention, however, the ballast 300 will likewise be profiled as closely as practical so as to mimic the profile of my improved hull 200. In describing the Figures of my drawing, it is not my intention to flood the reader with nautical marine terms, but rather to set the description in sufficient generality that the novel features of my invention can be understood by those skilled in the marine art and others not so skilled as well.
Turning now to
Mast 110,
The mainsail is 125 and is flat topped. The mizzen sail 135 is shown with part of the mizzen boom and the leech edge of the mizzen sail dashed since it is hidden behind the mainsail 125. The foresail 140, in this depiction, is about a 70% sail ending abreast the edge of mizzen sail 135. Other foresails are obviously available for my VC racer.
Mast 110—rather than being fixed in position—rides in a traveler 115. Traveler 115 is set upon suitable rails 128,
The rigging, sails and spars of
Assume a wind direction as shown by arrow 90,
To tack, the mizzen shroud and the mizzen boom are both detached from traveler 136 so that they may move together move forward and up in the air several feet so that the mizzen sail 135 can clear the mast and shift leeward. The mizzen boom to achieve this position shift is restrained fore and aft in a commonly employed string lining maneuver.
Turning now to
In the longitudinal views of
The same contour lines 500 and station lines 400 of
The left hand side of
The reverse curvature of my hull profile is best shown in this
Collection and laminar flow is achieved by the
To the extent that the “S” lines 520 through 522 may be considered partially convex, please note that lines 520 through 522 are near the transom and they are above the water line. Thus, these lazy S line portions 520 through 522 are not in a wetted hull surface.
As noted earlier, the deep V monohull of the invention differs from more conventional wave creating approaches in that rather than trying to force water underneath or away from the hull, this concave hull invention strives to collect the water in a column along the entire wetted hull surface. Lines 501, 502 . . . through 515 in the right hand portion of my
The aligned points of maximum arc constriction are labeled at the approximate location which serves to guide this column of water. This aligned series of points are in a direct line from bow to stern. The maximum arc constriction serves as the water column guide from bow to stern.
I have solved favoritism for straight line travel in the VC racer, by the use of my new improved bow rudder 250. As shown earlier in my
Also formed in the bulkhead on either side of column 257 are rudder shoulders 280 that limit the amount of pivot travel for the bow rudder 250. These shoulders 280 ride within a pair of matching pie-shaped indents 285 on the bulkhead structure. As an angular steering movement is made under control of unit 260, the bow rudder 250 moves port or starboard as required.
b shows a bow rudder 250 moved hard to port about thirteen degrees to turn that direction. Such steering movements may be done by any conventional control such as hydraulic pistons 260, screw and traveler units, or the like.
Such container ships have hulls generally characterized by chines on smaller boats and turn of the bilge on larger ships. Again by employing a hull half breadth presentation in accordance with my
While my invention has been described with reference to particular examples of some preferred embodiments, it is my intention to cover all modifications and equivalents within the scope of the following claims. It is therefore requested that the following claims, which define my invention, be given a liberal interpretation commensurate with my contribution to the relevant technology.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
536070 | Dubreul | Mar 1895 | A |
1959523 | Chlebowski | May 1934 | A |
2185430 | Burgess | Jan 1940 | A |
2371478 | Steele | Mar 1945 | A |
2546704 | Sweeny et al. | Mar 1951 | A |
2612130 | Wendt | Sep 1952 | A |
3225729 | Ewing, Jr. | Dec 1965 | A |
3763810 | Payne | Oct 1973 | A |
4649851 | April | Mar 1987 | A |
4915048 | Stanford | Apr 1990 | A |
4936237 | Walters | Jun 1990 | A |
5120070 | Boyden | Jun 1992 | A |
5152238 | Page | Oct 1992 | A |
5231946 | Giles | Aug 1993 | A |
6138602 | Cary | Oct 2000 | A |
6158369 | Calderon | Dec 2000 | A |
6994049 | Schulz | Feb 2006 | B1 |
20050022713 | Reynolds | Feb 2005 | A1 |