Method and apparatus for wellbore fluid treatment

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10053957
  • Patent Number
    10,053,957
  • Date Filed
    Friday, June 12, 2015
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 21, 2018
    6 years ago
Abstract
A tubing string assembly for fluid treatment of a wellbore includes substantially pressure holding closures spaced along the tubing string, which each close at least one port through the tubing string wall. The closures are openable by a sleeve drivable through the tubing string inner bore.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to a method and apparatus for wellbore fluid treatment and, in particular, to a method and apparatus for selective flow control to a wellbore for fluid treatment.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

An oil or gas well relies on inflow of petroleum products. When drilling an oil or gas well, an operator may decide to leave productive intervals uncased (open hole) to expose porosity and permit unrestricted wellbore inflow of petroleum products. Alternately, the hole may be cased with a liner, which is then perforated to permit inflow through the openings created by perforating.


When natural inflow from the well is not economical, the well may require wellbore treatment termed stimulation. This is accomplished by pumping stimulation fluids such as fracturing fluids, acid, cleaning chemicals and/or proppant laden fluids to improve wellbore inflow.


In one previous method, the well is isolated in segments and each segment is individually treated so that concentrated and controlled fluid treatment can be provided along the wellbore. Often, in this method a tubing string is used with inflatable element packers thereabout which provide for segment isolation. The packers, which are inflated with pressure using a bladder, are used to isolate segments of the well and the tubing is used to convey treatment fluids to the isolated segment. Such inflatable packers may be limited with respect to pressure capabilities as well as durability under high pressure conditions. Generally, the packers are run for a wellbore treatment, but must be moved after each treatment if it is desired to isolate other segments of the well for treatment. This process can be expensive and time consuming. Furthermore, it may require stimulation pumping equipment to be at the well site for long periods of time or for multiple visits. This method can be very time consuming and costly.


Other procedures for stimulation treatments use tubing strings without packers such that tubing is used to convey treatment fluids to the wellbore, the fluid being circulated up hole through the annulus between the tubing and the wellbore wall or casing.


The tubing string, which conveys the treatment fluid, can include ports or openings for the fluid to pass therethrough into the borehole. Where more concentrated fluid treatment is desired in one position along the wellbore, a small number of larger ports are used. In another method, where it is desired to distribute treatment fluids over a greater area, a perforated tubing string is used having a plurality of spaced apart perforations through its wall. The perforations can be distributed along the length of the tube or only at selected segments. The open area of each perforation can be pre-selected to control the volume of fluid passing from the tube during use. When fluids are pumped into the liner, a pressure drop is created across the sized ports. The pressure drop causes approximate equal volumes of fluid to exit each port in order to distribute stimulation fluids to desired segments of the well.


In many previous systems, it is necessary to run the tubing string into the bore hole with the ports or perforations already opened. This is especially true where a distributed application of treatment fluid is desired such that a plurality of ports or perforations must be open at the same time for passage therethrough of fluid. This need to run in a tube already including open perforations can hinder the running operation and limit usefulness of the tubing string.


Some sleeve systems have been proposed for flow control through tubing ports. However, the ports are generally closely positioned such that they can all be covered by the sleeve.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

A method and apparatus has been invented which provides for selective communication to a wellbore for fluid treatment. In one aspect, the method and apparatus provide for the running in of a fluid treatment string, the fluid treatment string having ports substantially closed against the passage of fluid therethrough, but which are openable when desired to permit fluid flow into the wellbore. The apparatus and methods of the present invention can be used in various borehole conditions including open holes, lined or cased holes, vertical, inclined or horizontal holes, and straight or deviated holes.


In one embodiment, there is provided an apparatus for fluid treatment of a borehole, the apparatus comprising a tubing string having a long axis, a plurality of closures accessible from the inner diameter of the tubing string, each closure closing a port opened through the wall of the tubing string and preventing fluid flow through its port, but being openable to permit fluid flow through its port and each closure openable independently from each other closure and a port opening sleeve positioned in the tubing string and driveable through the tubing string to actuate the plurality of closures to open the ports.


The sleeve can be driven in any way to move through the tubing string to actuate the plurality of closures. In one embodiment, the sleeve is driveable remotely, without the need to trip a work string such as a tubing string, coiled tubing or a wire line.


In one embodiment, the sleeve has formed thereon a seat and the apparatus includes a sealing device selected to seal against the seat, such that fluid pressure can be applied to drive the sleeve and the sealing device can seal against fluid passage past the sleeve. The sealing device can be, for example, a plug or a ball, which can be deployed without connection to surface. This embodiment avoids the need for tripping in a work string for manipulation.


In one embodiment, the closures each include a cap mounted over its port and extending into the tubing string inner bore, the cap being openable by the sleeve engaging against. The cap, when opened, permits fluid flow through the port. The cap can be opened, for example, by action of the sleeve breaking open the cap or shearing the cap from its position over the port.


In another embodiment, the closures each include a port-closure sleeve mounted over at least one port and openable by the sleeve engaging and moving the port-closure sleeve away from its associated at least one port. The port-closure sleeve can include, for example, a profile on its surface open to the tubing string and the port-opening sleeve includes a locking dog biased outwardly therefrom and selected to engage the profile on the port-closure sleeve such that the port-closure sleeve is moved by the port opening sleeve. The profile is formed such that the locking dog can disengage therefrom, permitting the sleeve to move along the tubing string to a next port-closure sleeve.


In one embodiment, the apparatus can include a packer about the tubing string. The packers can be of any desired type to seal between the wellbore and the tubing string. For example, the packer can be a solid body packer including multiple packing elements.


In view of the foregoing there is provided a method for fluid treatment of a borehole, the method comprising: providing an apparatus for wellbore treatment according to one of the various embodiments of the invention; running the tubing string into a wellbore to a position for treating the wellbore; moving the sleeve to open the closures of the ports and increasing fluid pressure to force wellbore treatment fluid out through the ports.


In one method according to the present invention, the fluid treatment is a borehole stimulation using stimulation fluids such as one or more of acid, gelled acid, gelled water, gelled oil, CO2, nitrogen and any of these fluids containing proppants, such as for example, sand or bauxite. The method can be conducted in an open hole or in a cased hole. In a cased hole, the casing may have to be perforated prior to running the tubing string into the wellbore, in order to provide access to the formation.


The method can include setting a packer about the tubing string to isolate the fluid treatment to a selected section of the wellbore.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

A further, detailed, description of the invention, briefly described above, will follow by reference to the following drawings of specific embodiments of the invention. These drawings depict only typical embodiments of the invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope. In the drawings:



FIG. 1 is a sectional view through a wellbore having positioned therein a fluid treatment assembly according to the present invention;



FIG. 2 is a sectional view through a wellbore having positioned therein a fluid treatment assembly according to the present invention;



FIG. 3 is a sectional view along the long axis of a packer useful in the present invention;



FIG. 4a is a section through another wellbore having positioned therein another fluid treatment assembly according to the present invention, the fluid treatment assembly being in a first stage of wellbore treatment;



FIG. 4b is a section through the wellbore of FIG. 4a with the fluid treatment assembly in a second stage of wellbore treatment;



FIG. 4c is a section through the wellbore of FIG. 4a with the fluid treatment assembly in a third stage of wellbore treatment;



FIG. 5 is a sectional view along the long axis of a tubing string according to the present invention containing a sleeve and axially spaced fluid treatment ports;



FIG. 6 is a sectional view along the long axis of a tubing string according to the present invention containing a sleeve and axially spaced fluid treatment ports;



FIG. 7a is a section through a wellbore having positioned therein another fluid treatment assembly according to the present invention, the fluid treatment assembly being in a first stage of wellbore treatment;



FIG. 7b is a section through the wellbore of FIG. 7a with the fluid treatment assembly in a second stage of wellbore treatment;



FIG. 7c is a section through the wellbore of FIG. 7a with the fluid treatment assembly in a third stage of wellbore treatment; and



FIG. 7d is a section through the wellbore of FIG. 7a with the fluid treatment assembly in a fourth stage of wellbore treatment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PRESENT INVENTION

Referring to FIG. 1, a wellbore fluid treatment assembly is shown, which can be used to effect fluid treatment of a formation 10 through a wellbore 12. The wellbore assembly includes a tubing string 14 having a lower end 14a and an upper end extending to surface (not shown). Tubing string 14 includes a plurality of spaced apart ports 17 opened through the tubing string wall to permit access between the tubing string inner bore 18 and the wellbore. Each port 17 includes thereover a closure that can be closed to substantially prevent, and selectively opened to permit, fluid flow through the ports.


A port-opening sleeve 22 is disposed in the tubing string to control the opening of the port closures. In this embodiment, sleeve 22 is mounted such that it can move, arrow A, from a port closed position, wherein the sleeve is shown in phantom, axially through the tubing string inner bore past the ports to a open port position, shown in solid lines, to open the associated closures of the ports allowing fluid flow therethrough. The sliding sleeve is disposed to control the opening of the ports through the tubing string and is moveable from a closed port position to a position wherein the ports have been opened by passing of the sleeve and fluid flow of, for example, stimulation fluid is permitted down through the tubing string, arrows F, through the ports of the ported interval. If fluid flow is continued, the fluid can return to surface through the annulus.


The tubing string is deployed into the borehole in the closed port position and can be positioned down hole with the ports at a desired location to effect fluid treatment of the borehole.


Referring to FIG. 2, a wellbore fluid treatment assembly is shown, which can be used to effect fluid treatment of a formation 10 through a wellbore 12. The wellbore assembly includes a tubing string 14 having a lower end 14a and an upper end extending to surface (not shown). Tubing string 14 includes a plurality of spaced apart ported intervals 16c to 16e each including a plurality of ports 17 opened through the tubing string wall to permit access between the tubing string inner bore 18 and the wellbore. The ports are normally closed by pressure holding caps 23.


Packers 20d to 20e are mounted between each pair of adjacent ported intervals. In the illustrated embodiment, a packer 20f is also mounted below the lower most ported interval 16e and lower end 14a of the tubing string. Although not shown herein, a packer can be positioned above the upper most ported interval. The packers are disposed about the tubing string and selected to seal the annulus between the tubing string and the wellbore wall, when the assembly is disposed in the wellbore. The packers divide the wellbore into isolated segments wherein fluid can be applied to one segment of the well, but is prevented from passing through the annulus into adjacent segments. As will be appreciated the packers can be spaced in any way relative to the ported intervals to achieve a desired interval length or number of ported intervals per segment. In addition, packer 20f need not be present in some applications.


The packers can be, as shown, of the solid body-type with at least one extrudable packing element, for example, formed of rubber. Solid body packers including multiple, spaced apart packing elements 21a, 21b on a single packer are particularly useful especially for example in open hole (unlined wellbore) operations. In another embodiment, a plurality of packers are positioned in side by side relation on the tubing string, rather than using only one packer between each ported interval.


Sliding sleeves 22c to 22e are disposed in the tubing string to control the opening of the ports by opening the caps. In this embodiment, a sliding sleeve is mounted for each ported interval and can be moved axially through the tubing string inner bore to open the caps of its interval. In particular, the sliding sleeves are disposed to control the opening of their ported intervals through the tubing string and are each moveable from a closed port position away from the ports of the ported interval (as shown by sleeves 22c and 22d) to a position wherein it has moved past the ports to break open the caps and wherein fluid flow of, for example, stimulation fluid is permitted through the ports of the ported interval (as shown by sleeve 22e).


The assembly is run in and positioned downhole with the sliding sleeves each in their closed port position. When the tubing string is ready for use in fluid treatment of the wellbore, the sleeves are moved to their port open positions. The sleeves for each isolated interval between adjacent packers can be opened individually to permit fluid flow to one wellbore segment at a time, in a staged treatment process.


Preferably, the sliding sleeves are each moveable remotely, for example without having to run in a line or string for manipulation thereof, from their closed port position to their position permitting through-port fluid flow. In one embodiment, the sliding sleeves are actuated by devices, such as balls 24d, 24e (as shown) or plugs, which can be conveyed by gravity or fluid flow through the tubing string. The device engages against the sleeve and causes it to move4 through the tubing string. In this case, ball 24e is sized so that it cannot pass through sleeve 22e and is engaged in it when pressure is applied through the tubing string inner bore 18 from surface, ball 24e seats against and plugs fluid flow past the sleeve. Thus, when fluid pressure is applied after the ball has seated in the sleeve, a pressure differential is created above and below the sleeve which drives the sleeve toward the lower pressure side.


In the illustrated embodiment, the inner surface of each sleeve, which is the side open to the inner bore of the tubing string, defines a seat 26e onto which an associated ball 24e, when launched from surface, can land and seal thereagainst. When the ball seals against the sleeve seat and pressure is applied or increased from surface, a pressure differential is set up which causes the sliding sleeve on which the ball has landed to slide through the tubing string to an port-open position until it is stopped by, for example, a no go. When the ports of the ported interval 16e are opened, fluid can flow therethrough to the annulus between the tubing string and the wellbore and thereafter into contact with formation 10.


Each of the plurality of sliding sleeves has a different diameter seat and, therefore, each accept a different sized ball. In particular, the lower-most sliding sleeve 22e has the smallest diameter D1 seat and accepts the smallest sized ball 24e and each sleeve that is progressively closer to surface has a larger seat. For example, as shown in FIG. 1b, the sleeve 22c includes a seat 26c having a diameter D3, sleeve 22d includes a seat 26d having a diameter D2, which is less than D3 and sleeve 22e includes a seat 26e having a diameter D1, which is less than D2. This provides that the lowest sleeve can be actuated to open it ports first by first launching the smallest ball 24e, which can pass though all of the seats of the sleeves closer to surface but which will land in and seal against seat 26e of sleeve 22e. Likewise, penultimate sleeve 22d can be actuated to move through ported interval 16d by launching a ball 24d which is sized to pass through all of the seats closer to surface, including seat 26c, but which will land in and seal against seat 26d.


Lower end 14a of the tubing string can be open, closed or fitted in various ways, depending on the operational characteristics of the tubing string which are desired. In the illustrated embodiment, the tubing string includes a pump out plug assembly 28. Pump out plug assembly 28 acts to close off end 14a during run in of the tubing string, to maintain the inner bore of the tubing string relatively clear. However, by application of fluid pressure, for example at a pressure of about 3000 psi, the plug can be blown out to permit actuation of the lower most sleeve 22e by generation of a pressure differential. As will be appreciated, an opening adjacent end 14a is only needed where pressure, as opposed to gravity, is needed to convey the first ball to land in the lower-most sleeve. Alternately, the lower most sleeve can be hydraulically actuated, including a fluid actuated piston secured by shear pins, so that the sleeve can be driven along the tubing string remotely without the need to land a ball or plug therein.


In other embodiments, not shown, end 14a can be left open or can be closed, for example, by installation of a welded or threaded plug.


While the illustrated tubing string includes three ported intervals, it is to be understood that any number of ported intervals could be used. In a fluid treatment assembly desired to be used for staged fluid treatment, at least two openable ports from the tubing string inner bore to the wellbore must be provided such as at least two ported intervals or an openable end and one ported interval. It is also to be understood that any number of ports can be used in each interval.


Centralizer 29 and other tubing string attachments can be used, as desired.


The wellbore fluid treatment apparatus, as described with respect to FIG. 2, can be used in the fluid treatment of a wellbore. For selectively treating formation 10 through wellbore 12, the above-described assembly is run into the borehole and the packers are set to seal the annulus at each location creating a plurality of isolated annulus zones. Fluids can then pumped down the tubing string and into a selected zone of the annulus, such as by increasing the pressure to pump out plug assembly 28. Alternately, a plurality of open ports or an open end can be provided or lower most sleeve can include a piston face for hydraulic actuation thereof. Once that selected zone is treated, as desired, ball 24e or another sealing plug is launched from surface and conveyed by gravity or fluid pressure to seal against seat 26e of the lower most sliding sleeve 22e, this seals off the tubing string below sleeve 22e and drives the sleeve to open the ports of ported interval 16e to allow the next annulus zone, the zone between packer 20e and 20f, to be treated with fluid. The treating fluids will be diverted through the ports of interval 16e whose caps have been removed by moving the sliding sleeve. The fluid can then be directed to a specific area of the formation. Ball 24e is sized to pass though all of the seats closer to surface, including seats 26c, 26d, without sealing thereagainst. When the fluid treatment through ports 16e is complete, a ball 24d is launched, which is sized to pass through all of the seats, including seat 26c closer to surface, and to seat in and move sleeve 22d. This opens the ports of ported interval 16d and permits fluid treatment of the annulus between packers 20d and 20e. This process of launching progressively larger balls or plugs is repeated until all of the zones are treated. The balls can be launched without stopping the flow of treating fluids. After treatment, fluids can be shut in or flowed back immediately. Once fluid pressure is reduced from surface, any balls seated in sleeve seats can be unseated by pressure from below to permit fluid flow upwardly therethrough.


The apparatus is particularly useful for stimulation of a formation, using stimulation fluids, such as for example, acid, gelled acid, gelled water, gelled oil, CO2, nitrogen and/or proppant laden fluids.


Referring to FIG. 3, a packer 20 is shown which is useful in the present invention. The packer can be set using pressure or mechanical forces. Packer 20 includes extrudable packing elements 21a, 21b, a hydraulically actuated setting mechanism and a mechanical body lock system 31 including a locking ratchet arrangement. These parts are mounted on an inner mandrel 32. Multiple packing elements 21a, 21b are formed of elastomer, such as for example, rubber and include an enlarged cross section to provide excellent expansion ratios to set in oversized holes. The multiple packing elements 21a, 21b can be separated by at least 0.3M and preferably 0.8M or more. This arrangement of packing elements aid in providing high pressure sealing in an open borehole, as the elements load into each other to provide additional pack-off.


Packing element 21a is mounted between fixed stop ring 34a and compressing ring 34b and packing element 21b is mounted between fixed stop ring 34c and compressing ring 34d. The hydraulically actuated setting mechanism includes a port 35 through inner mandrel 32, which provides fluid access to a hydraulic chamber defined by first piston 36a and second piston 36b. First piston 36a acts against compressing ring 34b to drive compression and, therefore, expansion of packing element 21a, while second piston 36b acts against compressing ring 34d to drive compression and, therefore, expansion of packing element 21b. First piston 36a includes a skirt 37, which encloses the hydraulic chamber between the pistons and is telescopically disposed to ride over piston 36b. Seals 38 seal against the leakage of fluid between the parts. Mechanical body lock system 31, including for example a ratchet system, acts between skirt 37 and piston 36b permitting movement therebetween driving pistons 36a, 36b away from each other but locking against reverse movement of the pistons toward each other, thereby locking the packing elements into a compressed, expanded configuration.


Thus, the packer is set by pressuring up the tubing string such that fluid enters the hydraulic chamber and acts against pistons 36a, 36b to drive them apart, thereby compressing the packing elements and extruding them outwardly. This movement is permitted by body lock system 31. However, body lock system 31 locks the packers against retraction to lock the packing elements in their extruded conditions.


Ring 34a includes shears 38 which mount the ring to mandrel 32. Thus, for release of the packing elements from sealing position the tubing string into which mandrel 32 is connected, can be pulled up to release shears 38 and, thereby, release the compressing force on the packing elements.



FIGS. 4a to 4c shows an assembly and method for fluid treatment, termed sprinkling, wherein fluid supplied to an isolated interval is introduced in a distributed, low pressure fashion along an extended length of that interval. The assembly includes a tubing string 212 and ported intervals 216a, 216b, 216c each including a plurality of ports 217 spaced along the long axis of the tubing string. Packers 220a, 220b are provided between each interval to form an isolated, segment in the wellbore 212.


While the ports of interval 216c are open during run in of the tubing string, the ports of intervals 216b and 216a, are closed during run in and sleeves 222a and 222b are mounted within the tubing string and actuatable to selectively open the ports of intervals 216a and 216b, respectively. In particular, in FIG. 4a, the position of sleeve 222b is shown when the ports of interval 216b are closed. The ports in any of the intervals can be size restricted to create a selected pressure drop therethrough, permitting distribution of fluid along the entire ported interval.


Once the tubing string is run into the well, stage 1 is initiated wherein stimulation fluids are pumped into the end section of the well to ported interval 216c to begin the stimulation treatment (FIG. 4a). Fluids will be forced to the lower section of the well below packer 220b. In this illustrated embodiment, the ports of interval 216c are normally open size restricted ports, which do not require opening for stimulation fluids to be jetted therethrough. However, it is to be understood that the ports can be installed in closed configuration, but opened once the tubing is in place.


When desired to stimulate another section of the well (FIG. 4b), a ball or plug (not shown) is pumped by fluid pressure, arrow P, down the well and will seat in a selected sleeve 222b sized to accept the ball or plug. The pressure of the fluid behind the ball will push the cutter sleeve against any force or member, such as a shear pin, holding the sleeve in position and down the tubing string, arrow S. As it moves down, it will open the ports of interval 216b as it passes by them. Sleeve 222b eventually stops against a stop means. Since fluid pressure will hold the ball in the sleeve, this effectively shuts off the lower segment of the well including previously treated interval 216c. Treating fluids will then be forced through the newly opened ports. Using limited entry or a flow regulator, a tubing to annulus pressure drop insures distribution. The fluid will be isolated to treat the formation between packers 220a and 220b.


After the desired volume of stimulation fluids are pumped, a slightly larger second ball or plug is injected into the tubing and pumped down the well, and will seat in sleeve 222a which is selected to retain the larger ball or plug. The force of the moving fluid will push sleeve 222a down the tubing string and as it moves down, it will open the ports in interval 216a. Once the sleeve reaches a desired depth as shown in FIG. 4c, it will be stopped, effectively shutting off the lower segment of the well including previously treated intervals 216b and 216c. This process can be repeated a number of times until most or all of the wellbore is treated in stages, using a sprinkler approach over each individual section.


The above noted method can also be used for wellbore circulation to circulate existing wellbore fluids (drilling mud for example) out of a wellbore and to replace that fluid with another fluid. In such a method, a staged approach need not be used, but the sleeve can be used to open ports along the length of the tubing string. In addition, packers need not be used when the apparatus is intended for wellbore circulation as it is often desirable to circulate the fluids to surface through the wellbore annulus.


The sleeves 222a and 222b can be formed in various ways to cooperate with ports 217 to open those ports as they pass through the tubing string.


With reference to FIG. 5, a tubing string 214 according to the present invention is shown including a movable sleeve 222 and a plurality of normally closed ports 217 spaced along the long axis x of the string. Ports 217 each include a pressure holding, internal cap 223. Cap 223 extends into the bore 218 of the tubing string and is formed of shearable material at least at its base, so that it can be sheared off to open the port. Cap 223 can be, for example, a cobe sub or other modified subs. As will be appreciated, due to the use of ball actuated sleeves, the caps are selected to be resistant to shearing by movement of a ball therepast.


Sleeve 222 is mounted in the tubing string and includes a cylindrical outer surface having a diameter to substantially conform to the inner diameter of, but capable of sliding through, the section of the tubing string in which the sleeve is selected to act. Sleeve 222 is mounted in tubing string by use of a shear pin 250 and has a seat 226 formed on its inner facing surface with a seat diameter to be plugged by a selected size ball 224 having a diameter greater than the seat diameter. When the ball is seated in the seat, and fluid pressure is applied therebehind, arrow P, shear pin 250 will shear and the sleeve will be driven, with the ball seated therein along the length of the tubing string until stopped by shoulder 246.


Sleeve 222 includes a profiled leading end 247 which is formed to shear or cut off the protective caps 223 from the ports as it passes, thereby opening the ports. Sleeve 222 and caps 223 are selected with consideration as to the fluid pressures to be used to substantially ensure that the sleeve can shear the caps from and move past the ports as it is driven through the tubing string.


While shoulder 246 is illustrated as an annular step on the inner diameter of the tubing string, it is to be understood that any configuration that stops movement of the sleeve though the wellbore can be used. Shoulder 246 is preferably spaced from the ports 217 with consideration as to the length of sleeve 222 such that when the sleeve is stopped against the shoulder, the sleeve does not cover any ports. Although not shown, the sleeve can be disposed in a circumferential groove in the tubing string, the groove having a diameter greater than the id of the tubing string. In such an embodiment, the sleeve could be disposed in the groove to eliminate or limit its extension into the tubing string inner diameter.


Sleeve 222 can include seals 252 to seal between the interface of the sleeve and the tubing string, where it is desired to seal off fluid flow therebetween.


The caps can also be used to close off ports disposed in a plane orthogonal to the long axis of the tubing string, if desired.


Referring to FIG. 6, there is shown another tubing string 314 according to the present invention. The tubing string includes an axially movable sleeve 322 and a plurality of normally closed ports 317a, 317a′, 317b, 317b′. Ports 317a, 317a′ are spaced from each other on the tubing circumference. Ports 317b, 317b′ are also spaced circumferentially in a plane orthogonal to the long axis of the tubing string. Ports 317a, 317a′ are spaced from ports 317b, 317b′ along the long axis x of the string.


Sleeve 322 is normally mounted by shear 350 in the tubing string. However, fluid pressure created by seating of a plug 324 in the sleeve, can cause the shear to be sheared and the sleeve to be driven along the tubing string until it butts against a shoulder 346.


Ports 317a, 317a′ have positioned thereover a port-closing sleeve 325a and ports 317b, 317b′ have positioned thereover a port closing sleeve 325b. The sleeves act as valves to seal against fluid flow though their associated ports, when they are positioned thereover. However, sleeves 325a, 325b can be moved axially along the tubing string to exposed their associated ports, permitting fluid flow therethrough. In particular, with reference to ports 317a, 317a′, each set of ports includes an associated sliding sleeve disposed in a cylindrical groove, defined by shoulders 327a, 327b about the port. The groove is formed in the inner wall of the tubing string and sleeve 325a is selected to have an inner diameter that is generally equal to the tubing string inner diameter and an outer diameter that substantially conforms to, but is slidable along, the groove between shoulders 327a, 327b. Seals 329 are provided between sleeve 325a and the groove, such that fluid leakage therebetween is substantially avoided.


The port closing sleeves, for example 325a, are normally positioned over their associated ports 317a, 317a′ adjacent shoulder 327a, but can be slid along the groove until stopped by shoulder 327b. In each ease, the shoulder 327b is spaced from its ports with consideration as to the length of the associated sleeve so that when the sleeve is butted against shoulder 327b, the port is open to allow at least some fluid flow therethrough.


The port-closing sleeves 325a, 325b are each formed to be engaged and moved by sleeve 322 as it passes through the tubing string from its pinned position to its position against shoulder 346. In the illustrated embodiments, sleeves 325a, 325b are moved by engagement of outwardly biased dogs 351 on the sleeve 322. In particular, each sleeve 325a, 325b includes a profile 353a, 353b into which dogs 351 can releasably engage. The spring force of dogs and the co acting configurations of profiles and the dogs are together selected to be greater than the resistance of sleeve 325 moving within the groove, but less than the fluid pressure selected to be applied against ball 324, such that when sleeve 322 is driven through the tubing string, it will engage against each sleeve 325a to move it away from its ports 317a, 317a′ and against its associated shoulder 327b. However, continued application of fluid pressure will drive the dogs 351 of the sleeve 322 to collapse, overcoming their spring force, to remove the sleeve from engagement with a first port-closing sleeve 325a, along the tubing string 314 and into engagement with the profile 353b of the next-port associated sleeve 325b to move that sleeve and open ports 317b, 317b′ and so on, until sleeve 322 stopped against shoulder 346.


Referring to FIGS. 7a to 7d, the wellbore fluid treatment assemblies described above can also be combined with a series of ball activated focused approach sliding sleeves and packers as described in applicant's corresponding US Application 2003/0127227 to allow some segments of the well to be stimulated using a sprinkler approach and other segments of the well to be stimulated using a focused fracturing approach.


In this embodiment, a tubing or casing string 414 is made up with two ported intervals 316b, 316d formed of subs having a series of size restricted ports 317 therethrough and in which the ports are each covered, for example, with protective pressure holding internal caps and in which each interval includes a movable sleeve 322b, 322d with profiles that can act as a cutter to cut off the protective caps to open the ports. Other ported intervals 16a, 16c include a plurality of ports 417 disposed about a circumference of the tubing string and are closed by a ball or plug activated sliding sleeves 22a, 22c. Packers 420a, 420b, 420c, 420d are disposed between each interval to create isolated segments along the wellbore 412.


Once the system is run into the well (FIG. 7a), the tubing string can be pressured to set some or all of the open hole packers. When the packers are set, stimulation fluids are pumped into the end section of the tubing to begin the stimulation treatment, identified as stage 1 sprinkler treatment in the illustrated embodiment. Initially, fluids will be forced to the lower section of the well below packer 420d. In stage 2, shown in FIG. 7b, a focused frac is conducted between packers 420c and 420d; in stage 3, shown in FIG. 7c, a sprinkler approach is used between packers 420b and 420c; and in stage 4, shown in FIG. 7d, a focused frac is conducted between packers 420a and 420b.


Sections of the well that use a “sprinkler approach”, intervals 316b, 316d, will be treated as follows: When desired, a ball or plug is pumped down the well, and will seat in one of the cutter sleeves 322b, 322d. The force of the moving fluid will push the cutter sleeve down the tubing string and as it moves down, it will remove the pressure holding caps from the segment of the well through which it passes. Once the cutter reaches a desired depth, it will be stopped by a no-go shoulder and the ball will remain in the sleeve effectively shutting off the lower segment of the well. Stimulation fluids are then pumped as required.


Segments of the well that use a “focused stimulation approach”, intervals 16a, 16c, will be treated as follows: Another ball or plug is launched and will seat in and shift open a pressure shifted sliding sleeve 22a, 22c, and block off the lower segment(s) of the well. Stimulation fluids are directed out the ports 417 exposed for fluid flow by moving the sliding sleeve.


Fluid passing through each interval is contained by the packers 420a to 420d on either side of that interval to allow for treating only that section of the well.


The stimulation process can be continued using “sprinkler” and/or “focused” placement of fluids, depending on the segment which is opened along the tubing string.


It will be apparent that changes may be made to the illustrative embodiments, while falling within the scope of the invention and it is intended that all such changes be covered by the claims appended hereto.

Claims
  • 1. An apparatus for fluid treatment of a borehole, the apparatus comprising: a tubing string having a long axis and a wall defining an inner bore,a plurality of closures accessible from the inner bore of the tubing string, each closure closing a port extending through the wall of the tubing string and preventing fluid flow through its port, but being openable to permit fluid flow through its port and each closure openable independently from each other closure, anda port-opening sleeve positioned in the tubing string and driveable by a plug through the tubing string to actuate the plurality of closures to open the ports.
  • 2. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein at least one of the plurality of closures includes a cap extending into the tubing string inner bore, the cap being openable by movement therepast of the port-opening sleeve.
  • 3. The apparatus of claim 2 wherein the cap is opened by engagement thereagainst by the port-opening sleeve has engaged against and opened the cap.
  • 4. The apparatus of claim 3 wherein cap is shearable by the port-opening sleeve.
  • 5. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein at least one of the plurality of closures includes a port-closure sleeve covering its port, the port-closure sleeve being moveable to expose its port by engagement of port-opening sleeve to move the port-closure sleeve along the tubing string.
  • 6. The apparatus of claim 5 wherein the port-closure sleeve includes a profile and the port-opening sleeve includes a locking dog biased outwardly therefrom and selected to lock into the profile on the port-closure sleeve.
  • 7. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the port-opening sleeve is driveable by plugging the sleeve with a sealing device and applying fluid pressure to move the sleeve.
  • 8. The apparatus of claim 7 wherein the sealing device can seal against fluid passage past the port-opening sleeve.
  • 9. The apparatus of claim 7 wherein the port-opening sleeve has formed thereon a seat and the sealing device is a plug.
  • 10. The apparatus of claim 7 wherein the port-opening sleeve has formed thereon a seat and the sealing device is a ball selected to seal against the seat.
  • 11. The apparatus of claim 1 further comprising a packer disposed about the tubing string.
  • 12. The apparatus of claim 11 wherein the packer is a solid body packer including multiple packing elements.
  • 13. The apparatus of claim 12 wherein the multiple packing elements are spaced apart.
  • 14. A method for fluid treatment of a borehole, the method comprising: providing an apparatus for wellbore treatment including a tubing string having a long axis and a wall defining an inner bore, a plurality of closures accessible from the inner bore of the tubing string, each closure closing a port extending through the wall of the tubing string and preventing fluid flow through its port, but being openable to permit fluid flow through its port and each closure openable independently from each other closure, and a port-opening sleeve positioned in the tubing string and driveable by a plug through the tubing string to actuate the plurality of closures to open the ports through the tubing string to actuate the plurality of closures to open the ports,running the tubing string into a wellbore to a position for treating the wellbore;moving the port-opening sleeve to open the closures of the ports and continuing fluid flow to force wellbore treatment fluid out through the ports.
  • 15. The method of claim 14, further comprising circulating the wellbore treatment fluid to surface.
  • 16. The method of claim 14, further comprising isolating the wellbore treatment fluid to zone in the wellbore.
  • 17. The method of claim 14 wherein the step of moving the sleeve is conducted remotely.
  • 18. The method of claim 17 wherein the sleeve includes a seat and the step of moving the sleeve includes deploying a sealing device to plug against the seat to create a pressure differential to drive the sleeve along the tubing string.
  • 19. The method of claim 14 wherein the step of moving the port-opening sleeve to open the closures of the ports includes shearing caps from the ports.
  • 20. The method of claim 14 wherein the step of moving the port-opening sleeve to open the closures of the ports includes moving port-closure sleeves from over the ports.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation application of U.S. Ser. No. 14/150,514 filed Jan. 8, 2014. U.S. Ser. No. 14/150,514 is a continuation application of Ser. No. 13/455,291 filed Apr. 25, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,657,009 issued Feb. 25, 2014 which is a continuation application of Ser. No. 12/830,412 filed Jul. 5, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,167,047 issued May 1, 2012, which is a continuation-in-part application of Ser. No. 12/208,463, filed Sep. 11, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,748,460 issued Jul. 6, 2010, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/403,957 filed Apr. 14, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,431,091, issued Oct. 7, 2008, which is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/604,807 filed Aug. 19, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,108,067, issued Sep. 19, 2006. This application also claims priority through the above-noted applications to U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/404,783 filed Aug. 21, 2002.

US Referenced Citations (337)
Number Name Date Kind
958100 Decker May 1910 A
1510669 Halliday Oct 1924 A
1785277 Mack Dec 1930 A
1956694 Parrish May 1934 A
2121002 Baker Jun 1938 A
2153034 Baker Apr 1939 A
2201299 Owsley et al. May 1940 A
2212087 Thornhill Aug 1940 A
2227539 Dorton Jan 1941 A
2248511 Westall Jul 1941 A
2249511 Westall Jul 1941 A
2287076 Zachry Jun 1942 A
2330267 Burt et al. Sep 1943 A
2352700 Ferris Jul 1944 A
2493650 Baker et al. Jan 1950 A
2537066 Lewis Jan 1951 A
2593520 Baker et al. Apr 1952 A
2606616 Otis Aug 1952 A
2618340 Lynd Nov 1952 A
2659438 Schnitter Nov 1953 A
2715444 Fewel Aug 1955 A
2731827 Loomis Jan 1956 A
2737244 Baker et al. Mar 1956 A
2752861 Hill Jul 1956 A
2764244 Page Sep 1956 A
2771142 Sloan et al. Nov 1956 A
2780294 Loomis Feb 1957 A
2807955 Loomis Oct 1957 A
2836250 Brown May 1958 A
2841007 Loomis Jul 1958 A
2851109 Spearow Sep 1958 A
2860489 Townsend Nov 1958 A
2869645 Chamberlain et al. Jan 1959 A
2945541 Maly et al. Jul 1960 A
2947363 Sackett et al. Aug 1960 A
3007523 Vincent Nov 1961 A
3035639 Brown et al. May 1962 A
3038542 Loomis Jun 1962 A
3054415 Baker et al. Sep 1962 A
3059699 Brown Oct 1962 A
3062291 Brown Nov 1962 A
3068942 Brown Dec 1962 A
3083771 Chapman Apr 1963 A
3083775 Nielson et al. Apr 1963 A
3095040 Bramlett Jun 1963 A
3095926 Rush Jul 1963 A
3122205 Brown Feb 1964 A
3148731 Holden Sep 1964 A
3153845 Loomis Oct 1964 A
3154940 Loomis Nov 1964 A
3158378 Loomis Nov 1964 A
3165918 Loomis Jan 1965 A
3165919 Loomis Jan 1965 A
3165920 Loomis Jan 1965 A
3193917 Loomis Jul 1965 A
3194310 Loomis Jul 1965 A
3195645 Loomis Jul 1965 A
3199598 Loomis Aug 1965 A
3263752 Conrad Aug 1966 A
3265132 Edwards, Jr. Aug 1966 A
3270814 Richardson et al. Sep 1966 A
3289762 Schell et al. Dec 1966 A
3291219 Nutter Dec 1966 A
3311169 Hefley Mar 1967 A
3333639 Page et al. Aug 1967 A
3361209 Edwards, Jr. Jan 1968 A
3427653 Jensen Feb 1969 A
3460626 Ehrlich Aug 1969 A
3517743 Pumpelly et al. Jun 1970 A
3523580 Lebourg Aug 1970 A
3552718 Schwegman Jan 1971 A
3587736 Brown Jun 1971 A
3645335 Current Feb 1972 A
3659648 Cobbs May 1972 A
3661207 Current et al. May 1972 A
3687202 Young et al. Aug 1972 A
3730267 Scott May 1973 A
3784325 Coanda et al. Jan 1974 A
3860068 Abney et al. Jan 1975 A
3948322 Baker Apr 1976 A
3981360 Marathe Sep 1976 A
4018272 Brown et al. Apr 1977 A
4031957 Sanford Jun 1977 A
4044826 Crowe Aug 1977 A
4099563 Hutchison Jul 1978 A
4143712 James et al. Mar 1979 A
4161216 Amancharia Jul 1979 A
4162691 Perkins Jul 1979 A
4216827 Crowe Aug 1980 A
4229397 Fukuta et al. Oct 1980 A
4279306 Weitz Jul 1981 A
4286662 Page Sep 1981 A
4298077 Emery Nov 1981 A
4299287 Vann et al. Nov 1981 A
4299397 Baker et al. Nov 1981 A
4315542 Dockins Feb 1982 A
4324293 Hushbeck Apr 1982 A
4338999 Carter, Jr. Jul 1982 A
4421165 Szarka Dec 1983 A
4423777 Mullins et al. Jan 1984 A
4436152 Fisher, Jr. et al. Mar 1984 A
4441558 Welch et al. Apr 1984 A
4469174 Freeman Sep 1984 A
4484625 Barbee, Jr. Nov 1984 A
4494608 Williams et al. Jan 1985 A
4498536 Ross et al. Feb 1985 A
4499951 Vann Feb 1985 A
4516879 Berry et al. May 1985 A
4519456 Cochran May 1985 A
4520870 Pringle Jun 1985 A
4524825 Fore Jun 1985 A
4552218 Ross et al. Nov 1985 A
4567944 Zunkel et al. Feb 1986 A
4569396 Brisco Feb 1986 A
4576234 Upchurch Mar 1986 A
4577702 Faulkner Mar 1986 A
4590995 Evans May 1986 A
4605062 Klumpyan et al. Aug 1986 A
4610308 Meek Sep 1986 A
4632193 Geczy Dec 1986 A
4637471 Soderberg Jan 1987 A
4640355 Hong et al. Feb 1987 A
4645007 Soderberg Feb 1987 A
4646829 Barrington et al. Mar 1987 A
4655286 Wood Apr 1987 A
4657084 Evans Apr 1987 A
4714117 Dech Dec 1987 A
4716967 Mohaupt Jan 1988 A
4754812 Gentry Jul 1988 A
4791992 Greenlee et al. Dec 1988 A
4794989 Mills Jan 1989 A
4823882 Stokley et al. Apr 1989 A
4880059 Brandell et al. Nov 1989 A
4893678 Stokley et al. Jan 1990 A
4903777 Jordan, Jr. et al. Feb 1990 A
4907655 Hromas et al. Mar 1990 A
4909326 Owen Mar 1990 A
4928772 Hopmann May 1990 A
4949788 Szarka et al. Aug 1990 A
4967841 Murray Nov 1990 A
4979561 Szarka Dec 1990 A
4991654 Brandell et al. Feb 1991 A
5020600 Coronado Jun 1991 A
5048611 Cochran Sep 1991 A
5103901 Greenlee Apr 1992 A
5146992 Baugh Sep 1992 A
5152340 Clark et al. Oct 1992 A
5172717 Boyle et al. Dec 1992 A
5174379 Whiteley et al. Dec 1992 A
5180015 Ringgenberg et al. Jan 1993 A
5186258 Wood et al. Feb 1993 A
5197543 Coulter Mar 1993 A
5197547 Morgan Mar 1993 A
5217067 Landry et al. Jun 1993 A
5221267 Folden Jun 1993 A
5242022 Burton et al. Sep 1993 A
5261492 Duell et al. Nov 1993 A
5271462 Berzin Dec 1993 A
5325924 Bangert et al. Jul 1994 A
5332038 Tapp et al. Jul 1994 A
5335732 McIntyre Aug 1994 A
5337808 Graham Aug 1994 A
5351752 Wood Oct 1994 A
5355953 Shy et al. Oct 1994 A
5375662 Echols, III et al. Dec 1994 A
5394941 Venditto et al. Mar 1995 A
5411095 Ehlinger et al. May 1995 A
5413180 Ross et al. May 1995 A
5425423 Dobson et al. Jun 1995 A
5449039 Hartley et al. Sep 1995 A
5454430 Kennedy et al. Oct 1995 A
5464062 Blizzard, Jr. Nov 1995 A
5472048 Kennedy et al. Dec 1995 A
5479989 Shy et al. Jan 1996 A
5499687 Lee Mar 1996 A
5526880 Jordan, Jr. et al. Jun 1996 A
5533571 Surjaatmadja et al. Jul 1996 A
5533573 Jordan, Jr. et al. Jul 1996 A
5542473 Pringle Aug 1996 A
5558153 Holcombe et al. Sep 1996 A
5579844 Rebardi et al. Dec 1996 A
5609178 Hennig et al. Mar 1997 A
5615741 Coronado Apr 1997 A
5641023 Ross et al. Jun 1997 A
5701954 Kilgore et al. Dec 1997 A
5711375 Ravi et al. Jan 1998 A
5715891 Graham et al. Feb 1998 A
5732776 Tubel et al. Mar 1998 A
5775429 Arizmendi et al. Jul 1998 A
5782303 Christian Jul 1998 A
5791414 Skinner Aug 1998 A
5810082 Jordan, Jr. Sep 1998 A
5826662 Beck et al. Oct 1998 A
5865254 Huber et al. Feb 1999 A
5894888 Wiemers et al. Apr 1999 A
5921318 Ross Jul 1999 A
5934372 Muth Aug 1999 A
5941307 Tubel Aug 1999 A
5941308 Malone et al. Aug 1999 A
5947198 McKee et al. Sep 1999 A
5954133 Ross Sep 1999 A
5960881 Allamon et al. Oct 1999 A
6003607 Hagen et al. Dec 1999 A
6006834 Skinner Dec 1999 A
6006838 Whiteley et al. Dec 1999 A
6009944 Gudmestad Jan 2000 A
6041858 Arizmendi Mar 2000 A
6047773 Zeltman et al. Apr 2000 A
6053250 Echols Apr 2000 A
6059033 Ross et al. May 2000 A
6065541 Allen May 2000 A
6070066 Montgomery Jun 2000 A
6079493 Longbottom et al. Jun 2000 A
6082458 Schnatzmeyer Jul 2000 A
6098710 Rhein-Knudsen et al. Aug 2000 A
6109354 Ringgenberg et al. Aug 2000 A
6112811 Kilgore et al. Sep 2000 A
6131663 Henley et al. Oct 2000 A
6148915 Mullen et al. Nov 2000 A
6155350 Melenyzer Dec 2000 A
6186236 Cox Feb 2001 B1
6189619 Wyatt et al. Feb 2001 B1
6220353 Foster et al. Apr 2001 B1
6220357 Carmichael et al. Apr 2001 B1
6220360 Connell et al. Apr 2001 B1
6227298 Patel May 2001 B1
6230811 Ringgenberg et al. May 2001 B1
6241013 Martin Jun 2001 B1
6250392 Muth Jun 2001 B1
6253861 Carmichael et al. Jul 2001 B1
6257338 Kilgore Jul 2001 B1
6279651 Schwendemann et al. Aug 2001 B1
6286600 Hall et al. Sep 2001 B1
6302199 Hawkins et al. Oct 2001 B1
6305470 Woie Oct 2001 B1
6311776 Pringle et al. Nov 2001 B1
6315041 Carlisle et al. Nov 2001 B1
6347668 McNeill Feb 2002 B1
6349772 Mullen et al. Feb 2002 B2
6388577 Carstensen May 2002 B1
6390200 Allamon May 2002 B1
6394184 Tolman et al. May 2002 B2
6446727 Zemlak et al. Sep 2002 B1
6460619 Braithwaite et al. Oct 2002 B1
6464006 Womble Oct 2002 B2
6467546 Allamon et al. Oct 2002 B2
6488082 Echols et al. Dec 2002 B2
6491103 Allamon et al. Dec 2002 B2
6520255 Tolman et al. Feb 2003 B2
6543538 Tolman et al. Apr 2003 B2
6543543 Muth Apr 2003 B2
6543545 Chatterji et al. Apr 2003 B1
6547011 Kilgore Apr 2003 B2
6571869 Pluchek et al. Jun 2003 B1
6591915 Burris Jul 2003 B2
6634428 Krauss et al. Oct 2003 B2
6651743 Szarka Nov 2003 B2
6695057 Ingram et al. Feb 2004 B2
6695066 Allamon et al. Feb 2004 B2
6722440 Turner et al. Apr 2004 B2
6725934 Coronado et al. Apr 2004 B2
6752212 Burris Jun 2004 B2
6763885 Cavender Jul 2004 B2
6782948 Echols et al. Aug 2004 B2
6820697 Churchill Nov 2004 B1
6883610 Depiak Apr 2005 B2
6907936 Fehr et al. Jun 2005 B2
6951331 Haughom et al. Oct 2005 B2
7021384 Themig Apr 2006 B2
7066265 Surjaatmadja Jun 2006 B2
7096954 Weng Aug 2006 B2
7108060 Jones Sep 2006 B2
7108067 Themig et al. Sep 2006 B2
7134505 Fehr et al. Nov 2006 B2
7152678 Turner et al. Dec 2006 B2
7198110 Kilgore et al. Apr 2007 B2
7231987 Kilgore et al. Jun 2007 B2
7240733 Hayes et al. Jul 2007 B2
7243723 Surjaatmadja et al. Jul 2007 B2
7267172 Hofman Sep 2007 B2
7353878 Themig Apr 2008 B2
7377321 Rytlewski May 2008 B2
7431091 Themig et al. Oct 2008 B2
7543634 Fehr et al. Jun 2009 B2
7571765 Themig Aug 2009 B2
7748460 Themig et al. Jul 2010 B2
7832472 Themig Nov 2010 B2
7861774 Fehr et al. Jan 2011 B2
8167047 Themig et al. May 2012 B2
8215411 Flores et al. Jul 2012 B2
8276675 Williamson et al. Oct 2012 B2
8281866 Tessier et al. Oct 2012 B2
8291980 Fay Oct 2012 B2
8393392 Mytopher et al. Mar 2013 B2
8397820 Fehr et al. Mar 2013 B2
8490685 Tolman et al. Jul 2013 B2
8657009 Themig et al. Feb 2014 B2
8714272 Garcia et al. May 2014 B2
8746343 Fehr et al. Jun 2014 B2
8757273 Themig et al. Jun 2014 B2
8978773 Tilley Mar 2015 B2
8997849 Lea-Wilson et al. Apr 2015 B2
9074451 Themig et al. Jul 2015 B2
9121264 Tokarek Sep 2015 B2
20010009189 Brooks et al. Jul 2001 A1
20010015275 van Petegem et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010018977 Kilgore Sep 2001 A1
20010050170 Woie et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020007949 Tolman et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020020535 Johnson et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020096328 Echols et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020112857 Ohmer et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020117301 Womble Aug 2002 A1
20020162660 Depiak et al. Nov 2002 A1
20030127227 Fehr et al. Jul 2003 A1
20040000406 Allamon et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040055752 Restarick et al. Mar 2004 A1
20050061508 Surjaatmadja Mar 2005 A1
20060048950 Dybevik et al. Mar 2006 A1
20070119598 Turner et al. May 2007 A1
20070151734 Fehr et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070272411 Lopez De Cardenas et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070272413 Rytlewski et al. Nov 2007 A1
20080017373 Jones et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080223587 Cherewyk Sep 2008 A1
20090084553 Rytlewski et al. Apr 2009 A1
20100132959 Tinker Jun 2010 A1
20110127047 Themig et al. Jun 2011 A1
20110180274 Wang et al. Jul 2011 A1
20120067583 Zimmerman et al. Mar 2012 A1
20120085548 Fleckenstein et al. Apr 2012 A1
20130014953 van Petegem Jan 2013 A1
20130043042 Flores et al. Feb 2013 A1
20140096970 Andrew et al. Apr 2014 A1
20140116731 Themig May 2014 A1
20140290944 Kristoffer Oct 2014 A1
20160069157 Themig Mar 2016 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (15)
Number Date Country
2412072 May 2003 CA
2838092 Mar 2014 CA
0094170 Nov 1983 EP
0724065 Jul 1996 EP
0802303 Apr 1997 EP
0823538 Feb 1998 EP
0950794 Oct 1999 EP
0985797 Mar 2000 EP
0985799 Mar 2000 EP
2311315 Sep 1997 GB
WO 1997036089 Oct 1997 WO
WO 2001006086 Jan 2001 WO
WO 2001069036 Sep 2001 WO
WO 2007017353 Feb 2007 WO
WO 2009132462 Nov 2009 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (216)
Entry
238th District Court, Midland, Texas, Case No. CV44964, Exhibit 10, Deposition of William Sloane Muscroft, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, dated Mar. 31, 2007, parts 1 and 2 for a total of 111 pages.
238th District Court, Midland, Texas, Case No. CV44964, Exhibit 11, Email from William Sloane Muscroft to Peter Krabben dated Jan. 11, Email from William Sloane Muscroft to Peter Krabben dated Jan. 27, 2000, 1 page.
238th District Court, Midland, Texas, Case No. CV44964, Exhibit 12, Email from William Sloane Muscroft to Daniel Jon Themig dated Feb. 1, 2000, 1 page.
238th District Court, Midland, Texas, Case No. CV44964, Exhibit 13, Email from Daniel Jon Themig to William Sloane Muscroft dated Jun. 19, 2000, 2 pages.
238th District Court, Midland, Texas, Case No. CV44964, Exhibit 6, Deposition of Daniel Jon Themig, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, dated Jan. 17, 2006, parts 1 and 2 total for a total of 82 pages with redactions from p. 336, Line 10 through all of p. 337.
238th District Court, Midland, Texas, Case No. CV44964, Exhibit 7, Deposition of Daniel Jon Themig, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, dated Jan. 8, 2007, 75 pages with redactions from p. 716, Line 23 through p. 726, Line 22.
238th District Court, Midland, Texas, Case No. CV44964, Exhibit 8, Deposition of Daniel Jon Themig, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, dated Jan. 9, 2007,46 pages with redactions on p. 850, Lines 13-19.
238th District Court, Midland, Texas, Case No. CV44964, Exhibit 9, Cross-examination of Daniel Jon Themig, In the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta, Canada, dated Mar. 14, 2005, 67 pages.
A.B. Yost et al., “Production and Stimulation Analysis of Multiple Hydraulic Fracturing of a 2,000-ft Horizontal Well,” SPE-19090, 14 pages, dated 1989.
A.P. Bunger et al., “Experimental Investigation of the Interaction Among Closely Spaced Hydraulic Fractures,” <https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/ARMA-11-318?sort=&start=0&q=review+AND+%22packers%22+AND+%22uncased+%22&from_year=2001&peer_reviewed=&published_between=on&fromSearchResults=true&to_year=&rows=50#>, ARMA-11-318, 11 pages, dated 2011.
Alfred M. Jackson et al., “Completion and Stimulation Challenges and Solutions for Extended-Reach Multizone Horizontal Wells in Carbonate Formations,” <https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-141812-MS?sort=&start=0&q=uncased+packer&from_year=2001&peer_reviewed=&published _between=on&fromSearchResults=true&to_year=&rows=50#>, SPE-141812-MS, 11 pages, dated 2011.
Anderson, Svend Aage, et al., “Exploiting Reservoirs with Horizontal Wells: the Maersk Experience,” Oilfield Review, vol. 2, No. 3, Jul. 11-21, 1990.
Angeles, et al., “One Year of Just-In-Time Perforating as Multi-Stage Fracturing Technique for Horizontal Wells,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 160034, 2012; 12 pages.
Arguijo, et al., “Streamlined Completions Process: An Eagle Ford Shale Case History,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 162658, 2012; 17 pages.
B.W. McDaniel et al., “Overview of Stimulation Technology for Horizontal Completions without Cemented Casing in the Lateral,” SPCE-77825, pp. 1-17, dated 2002.
Backer Packers, Flow Control Systems, 2 pages, 1982-83.
Baihly, Jason, et al, “Sleeve Activation in Open-hole Fracturing Systems: A Ball Selection Study”, Oct. 30-Nov. 1, 2012 (SPE Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference; SPE 162657), pp. 1-14, 2012.
Baker CAC, A Baker Hughes company, 1990-91 Condensed Catalog, 1990-91, 8 pages.
Baker Hughes Baker Oil Tools, Packer Systems Product Catalog, 152 pages.
Baker Hughes, “Intelligent Well Systems™,” bakerhughes.com, dated Jun. 7, 2001.
Baker Hughes, Baker Oil Tools, “Cased Hole Applications,” 95 pages.
Baker Hughes, Baker Oil Tools, “Open Hole Completion Systems”, 3 pages, 2004.
Baker Hughes, catalog, pp. 66-73, 1991.
Baker Hughes,“Re-entry Systems Technology,” <http://www.bakerhughes.com/Bot/iws/index.htm>, Dated 1999.
Baker Oil Tools Press Release, “The Edge, Electronically Enhanced Remote Autuation System,” dated Jun. 10, 1996.
Baker Oil Tools product advertisements allegedly from 1948-1969, 70 pages.
Baker Oil Tools Product Announcements, “Baker Oil Tools' HCM Remote Controlled Hydraulic Sliding Sleeve,”<http://www.bakerhughes.com/Bot/Pressroom/hcm.htm>, Dated Aug. 16, 2000.
Baker Oil Tools, “Baker Oil ToolsRegion/Area Locations,” 2 pages.
Baker Oil Tools, “Packer Systems”, 78 pages, undated.
Baker Oil Tools, “Plugging Devices”, Model ‘E’™ Hydro-Trip Sub, undated, 1 page.
Baker Oil Tools, “Retrievable Packer Systems, Model ‘E’™ Hydro-Trip Pressure Sub—Product No. 799-28”, undated, 1 page.
Baker Oil Tools, “Retrievable Packer Systems,” product brochure, 1 page, undated.
Baker Oil Tools, “Retrievable Packer Systems,” product catalog, 60 pages.
Baker Oil Tools, catalog, p. 29, Model “C” Packing Element Circulating Washer, Product No. 470-42, Mar. 1997.
Baker Oil Tools, catalog, p. 38, Twin Seal Submersible Pumppacker, undated.
Baker Oil Tools, Inc., “Technical Manual: Stage Cementing Equipment—Models “J” & “JB” Stage Cementing Collars” Aug. 1, 1966, 14 pages.
Baker Oil Tools, Inflatable Systems, pp. 1-50, undated, 50 pages.
Baker Oil Tools, Inflatable Systems, pp. 1-66, undated, 66 pages.
Baker Oil Tools, New Product Fact Sheet Retrievable Packer Systems, Model “PC” Hydraulic Isolation Packer Product No. 784-07, Jun. 1988, 2 pages.
Baker Oil Tools, Packer Systems Press Release, “Edge™ Remote Actuation System Successfully Sets Packer in Deepwater Gulf of Mexico,” dated Jun. 10, 1996, modified Apr. 1998.
Baker Oil Tools' Archived Product Catalogs, 963 pages.
Baker Packers Flow Control Equipment, Bulletin No. BFC-1-6/83, 142 pages.
Baker Packers, “Seating Nipples” and “Accessories for Sliding Sleeves”, pp. 13, 32-33, 99, 104-107, 110, 111, 114-115, undated.
Baker Packers, “Tool Identification by Model Number” and “Accessories for Selective and Top No-Go Seating Nipples”, 4 pages.
Baker Sand Control, Open Hole Gravel Packing, undated, 1 page.
Baker Service Tools, Catalog: Lynes Inflatable Products, 5 pages, undated.
Baker Service Tools, Washing Tools, 1 pages, undated.
Berryman, William, First Supplemental Expert Report in Cause No. CV-44964, 238th Judicial District of Texas, undated.
Bill Ellsworth et al., “Production Control of Horizontal Wells in a Carbonate Reef Structure,” 1999 CIM Horizontal Well Conference, 10 pages.
Billy W. McDaniel “Review of Current Fracture Stimulation Techniques for Best Economics in Multi-layer, Lower Permeability Reservoirs,” <https://www.onepetro.mg/conference-paper/SPE-98025-MS?sort=&start=0&q=review+horizontal+open+hole+%28uncased%29+completions+AND+%22multistage%22&from_year=2001&peer_reviewed=&published_between=on&fromSearchResults=true&to_year=2005&rows=50>, SPE-98025-MS, 19 pages, dated 2005.
BJ Services, Excape Completion Process, 12 pages,undated.
Brazil Oil & Gas, Norway Oil & Gas, 2009—Issue 10 Saudi Arabia Oil and Gas, 100 pages.
Brown Hughes, Hughes Production Tools General Catalog 1986-87, Brown Type PD 5000 Perforation Washer, 1986-87.
Brown Oil Tools General Catalog 1962-63, Hydraulic Set Packers and Hydraulic Set Retrievable Packers, pp. 870-871.
Brown Oil Tools, 1970-71 General Catalog, 3 pages, 1970-71.
Brown Oil Tools, catalog page, entitled “Brown HS-16-1 Hydraulic Set Retrievable Packers,” undated.
Brown Oil Tools, catalog page, entitled “Brown Hydraulic Set Packers,” undated.
Brown Oil Tools, Inc., “Brown Hydraulic Set Packers” 2 pages, undated.
Brown Oil Tools, Inc., Open Hole Packer—Long Lasting Dependability for Difficult Liner Cementing Jobs, 2 pages, undated.
Brown Oil Tools, Open Hole Packers—Long Lasting Dependability for Difficult Cementing Jobs, 1 page, undated.
“Brown Type Open Hole Packer”, Brown 1986-1987 Catalog, 1 page.
C.D. Pope, et al., “Completion Techniques for Horizontal Wells in the Pearsall Austin Chalk,” SPE Production Engineering, pp. 144-148, May 1992 (SPE 20682).
Canadian Sections SPE/Petroleum Society, 8th One-Day Conference on Horizontal Well Technology Schedule, Nov. 2001, 3 pages.
Canadian Sections SPE/Petroleum Society, 8th One-Day Conference on Horizontal Well Technology, Abstract: Open Hole Stimulation and Testing Carbonate Reservoirs, Nov. 2001, 1 page.
Canadian Sections SPE/Petroleum Society, 8th One-Day Conference on Horizontal Well Technology, Abstract: Successfule Open Hole Water Shut-Offs in Deep Hot Horizontal Wells, Nov. 2001, 1 page.
Canadian Sections SPE/Petroleum Society, 8th One-Day Conference on Horizontal Well Technology, Online Library Catalog Listing, Nov. 2001, 2 pages.
Canning, et al., “Innovative Pressure-Actuated Toe Sleeve Enables True Casing Pressure Integrity Test and Stage Fracturing While Improving Completion Economics in Unconventional Resources,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 167170, 2013; 7 pages.
Carpenter, C., “Technology Applications,” Journal of Petroleum Technology, accessible at http://www.spe.org/jpt/article/8570-technology-applications-33/, undated; 13 pages.
Chambers, M.R., et al, “Well Completion Design and Operations for a Deep Horizontal Well with Multiple Fractures”, 1995 (SPE 30417), pp. 499-505.
Chauffe, S., “Hydraulic to Valve Specifically Designed for a Cemented Environment,” AADE-13-FTCE-25, American Association of Drilling Engineers, 2013; 5 pages.
Composite Catalog of Oil Field Equipment and Services, Lynes Cement Collar, p. 18, 1980-81, 2 pages.
Composite Catalog of Oil Field Equipment Services, Baker Sand Control, Open Hole Gravel Packing, p. 870, 1980-81, 2 pages.
Conn, et al, “A Common Sense Approach to Intelligent Completions Through Improved Reliability and Lower Costs”, Technical Publication, PROMORE 002, Nov. 2001, 7 pages.
Conn, T., “The Need for Intelligent Completions in Land-Based Well”, PROMORE Engineering Inc, 2001, 8 pages.
Conn, Tim, “Get Smart, New Monitoring System Improves Understanding of Reservoirs”, New Technology Magazine, Jan./Feb. 2001.
Coon, Robert et al., “Single-Trip Completion Concept Replaces Multiple Packers and Sliding Sleeves in Selection Multi-Zone Production and Stimulation Operations,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE-29539, pp. 911-915, dated 1995.
Crawford, M., “Fracturing Gas-Bearing Strata,” Well Servicing Magazine, Nov.-Dec. 2009; 3 pages.
D.L. Purvis et al., “Alternative Method for Stimulating Open Hole Horizontal Wellbores,” SPE-55614, pp. 1-13, dated 1999.
D.W. Thomson et al., “Design and Installation of a Cost-Effective Completion System for Horizontal Chalk Wells Where Multiple Zones Require Acid Stimulation,” Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 8472, pp. 323-335, dated May 1997.
D.W. Thomson et al., “Design and Installation of a Cost-Effective Completion System for Horizontal Chalk Wells Where Multiple Zones Require Acid Stimulation,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 37482, pp. 97-108, dated 1997.
D.W. Thomson et al., “Design and Installation of a Cost-Effective Completion System for Horizontal Chalk Wells Where Multiple Zones Require Acid Stimulation,” SPE Drilling & Completion, SPE 51177, pp. 151-156, Sep. 1998, disclosed at SPE Production Operations Symposium, Mar. 9-11, 1997, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.
Damgaard, A.P. et al., “A Unique Method for Perforating, Fracturing, and Completing Horizontal Wells,” SPE Production Engineering, Feb. 1992, (SPE-19282), pp. 61-69.
Daniel Savulescu, “Inflatable Casing Packers—Expanding the limits,” Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, vol. 36, No. 9, pp. 9-10, dated Oct. 1997.
Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Rapid Completions LLC v. Baker Hughes Incorporated, et al., v. Packers Plus Energy Services, Inc., et al., Case No. 6:15-cv-00724-RWS-KNM (E.D. Texas); 84 pages.
Denney, D., “Technology Applications,” Journal of Petroleum Technology, accessible at http://www.spe.org/jpt/article/198-technology-applications-2012-04/, Apr. 2012; 10 pages.
Denney, D., “Technology Applications,” Journal of Petroleum Technology, accessible at http://www.spe.org/jpt/m/article/450-technology-applications-august-2012, Aug. 2012; 4 pages.
Donald S. Dreesen et al., “Developing Hot Dry Rock Reservoirs with Inflatable Open Hole Packers,” LA-UR-87-2083, 9 pages, dated 1987.
Donald S. Dreesen et al., “Open Hole Packer for High Pressure Service in a Five Hundred Degree Fahrenheit Precambrian Wellbore,” LA-UR-85-42332, SPE-14745, 14 pages, dated 1985.
Doug G. Durst et al. “Advanced Open Hole Multilaterals,” <https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-77199-MS?sort=&start=0&q=review+AND+%22packers%22+AND+%22open+hole%22&from_year=2001&peer_reviewed=&published_between=on&fromSearchResults=true&to_year=&rows=50#>, SPE-77199-MS, pp. 1-8, dated 2002.
Drawings, Packer Installation Plan, PACK 05543, 5 pages, 1997.
Dresser Oil Tools, catalog, Multilateral Completion Tools Section, undated.
Dresser Oil Tools, catalog, Technical Section, title page and p. 18, Nov. 1997.
Dresser Oil Tools, Multilateral and Horizontal Completions—Zonemaster Reservoir Access Mandrels, “The Zonemaster Reservoir Access Mandrel offers a long term performance alternative to the use of sliding sleeves in Horizontal wells.” undated, 2 pages.
European Search Report, European Appl. No. 10836870.5, EPO, 11 pages, dated Nov. 21, 2015.
Exxon Mobil, “Tight Gas: New Technologies, New Solutions,” ExxonMobil, May 2010; 2 pages.
F.M. Verga et al., “Advanced Well Simulation in a Multilayered Reservoir,” <https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-68821-MS?sort=&start=250&q=review+horizontal+open+hole+%28uncased%29+completions+AND+%22multi%22&from_year=&peer_reviewed=&published_between=on&fromSearchResults=true&to_year=2001&rows=50#>, SPE-68821-MS, 10 pages, dated 2001.
Federal Court of Calgary, Alberta Canada, Court File No. T-1202-13, Further Amended Statement of Defence and Counterclaim to Amended Statement of Claim, dated May 13, 2014, 24 pages.
Federal Court of Calgary, Alberta Canada, Court File No. T-1728-15, Statement of Defence and Counterclaim to Amended Statement of Claim, dated Feb. 1, 2016, 24 pages.
Federal Court of Toronto, Ontario Canada, Court File No. T-1202-13, Fresh As Amended Counterclaim of TMK Completions Ltd. and Perelam, LLC., dated Jul. 13, 2015, 15 pages.
Federal Court of Toronto, Ontario Canada, Court File No. T-1741-13, Statement of Defence and Counterclaim, dated Nov. 22, 2013, 11 pages.
First Supplemental Expert Report of Kevin Trahan, Case No. CV-44,964, 238th Judicial District, Midland County, Texas, Aug. 21, 2008, 28 pages.
Fishing Services, Baker Oil Tools, 2001 Catalog.
Fishing Services, Baker Oil Tools, undated catalog.
Garfield, et al., “Novel Completion Technology Eliminates Formation Damage and Reduces Rig Time in Sand Control Applications,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 93518, 2005; 5 pages.
George Everette King, “60 Years of Multi-Fractured Vertical, Deviated and Horizontal Wells: What Have We Learned?,” <https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-170952-MS?sort=&start=100&q=review+AND+%22packers%22+AND+%22open+hole%22&from_year=2014&peer_reviewed=&published_between=on&fromSearchResults=true&to_year=&rows=100#>, SPE-170952-MS, 32 pages, dated 2014.
Guiberson AVA—Dresser Oil Tools, “Technical Section—Advanced Horizontal and Multilateral Completions”, Nov. 1997, 36 pages.
Guiberson AVA & Dresser, Retrievable Packer Systems, “Tandem Packer (Wizard I)”, p. 32, undated.
Guiberson AVA & Dresser, “Hydraulic Set Packer: G-77 Packer,” p. 20, undated.
Guiberson AVA, Dresser Oil Tools, “Tech Manual: Wizard II Hydraulic Set Retrievable Packer,” Apr. 1998, 42 pages.
Guiberson AVA, Packer Installation Plan, 5 pages, Nov. 11, 1997.
Guiberson AVA, Packer Installation Plan, Aug. 26, 1997.
Guiberson AVA, Packer Installation Plan, Sep. 9, 1997.
Guiberson AVA, Wizard II Hydraulic Set Retrievable Packer Tech Manual, Apr. 1998.
Guiberson-AVA Dresser, catalog, front page and pp. 1 & 20, 1994.
Halliburton “Halliburton Guiberson® G-77 Hydraulic-Set Retrievable Packer,” 6 pages, undated.
Halliburton Oilwell Cementing Company, Fracturing Services, 1956 catalog, 6 pages.
Halliburton Oilwell Cementing Company, Improved Services for Increasing Production, 1956 catalog, 3 pages.
Halliburton Retrievable Service Tools, product brochure, 15 pages, undated.
Halliburton Services, 1970-71 Sales and Service Catalog, pp. 2335, 2338, 2340, and 2341, 6 pages.
Halliburton Services, 1970-71 Sales and Service Catalog, pp. 2434-2435, 3 pages.
Halliburton, Plaintiffs Fourth Amended Petition in Cause No. CV-44964, 238th Judicial District of Texas, Aug. 13, 2007.
Halliburton, catalog, pp. 51-54, 1957.
Halliburton, “Casing Sales Manual: Multiple-Stage Fracturing,” Jul. 2003, 10 pages.
Halliburton, “Full-Opening (FO) Multiple-Stage Cementer,” p. 12, 2001, 2 pages.
Halliburton, “Hydraulic-Set Guiberson™ Wizard Packer®,” 1 page, undated.
Halliburton, “Unlock the Trapped Potential of Your High Perm Reservoir,” <http://www.halliburton.com/products/prod_enhan/f-333511m> halliburton.com, dated Feb. 26, 2000.
Halliburton, “Zonemaster Reservoir Access Mandrel System”, undated.
Halliburton, Completion Products, p. 2-25, 1999 3 pages.
Halliburton, Multiple-Stage Fracturing, pp. 9-1 and 9-2, 2013.
Hansen, J. H. et al., “Controlled Acid Jet (CAJ) Technique for Effective Single Operation Stimulation of 14,000+ ft Long Reservoir Sections,” Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc., SPE 78318, Oct. 2002, 11 pages.
Henderson, R., “Open Hole Completion Systems,” Presentation, Kentucky Oil & Gas Association, 2014; 33 pages.
Henry Restarick, “Horizontal Completion Options in Reservoirs with Sand Problems,” SPE-29831, pp. 545-560, dated 1995.
Hodges, Steven, et al, “Hydraulically-Actuated Intelligent Completions: Development and Applications”, (OTC-11933-MS) May 2000, 16 pages.
Horizontal Completion Problems, Baker Hughes Solutions, 1996, 6 pages.
I.B. Ishak et al., “Review of Horizontal Drilling”, <https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-29812-MS?sort=&start=0&q=review+horizontal+open+hole+%28uncased%29+completions+AND+%22multi%22&from_year=&peer_reviewed=&published_between=on&fromSearchResults=true&to_year=2001&rows=50#>, SPE-29812-MS, pp. 391-404, dated 1995.
Ismail Gamal et al., “Ten Years Experience in Horizontal Application & Pushing the Limits of Well Construction Approach in Upper Zakum Field (Offshore Abu Dhabi),” <https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-87284-MS?sort=&start=150&q=review+horizontal+open+hole+%28uncased%29+completions+AND+%22multi%22&from_year=&peer_reviewed=&published_between=on&fromSearchResults=true&to_year=2001&rows=50#>, SPE-87284-MS, 17 pages, dated 2000.
J.C. Zimmerman et al., “Selection of Tools for Stimulation in Horizontal Cased Hole,” SPE-18995, 12 pages, dated 1989.
J.E. Brown et al., “An Analysis of Hydraulically Fractured Horizontal Wells,” SPE-24322, dated 1992.
Jesse J. Constantine, “Selective Production of Horizontal Openhole Completions Using ECP and Sliding Sleeve Technology,” SPE-55618, pp. 1-5, dated 1999.
John B. Weirich et al., “Frac-Packing: Best Practices and Lessons Learned from over 600 Operations,” <https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-147419-MS?sort=&start=0&q=%22packers%22+AND+%22open+hole%22+AND+%22review%22+AND+%22advanced%22&from_year=2010&peer_reviewed=&published_between=on&fromSearchResults=true&to_year=&rows=100#>, SPE-147419-MS, 17 pages, dated 2012.
John H. Healy et al., “Hydraulic Fracturing in Situ Stress Measurements to 2.1 KM Depth at Cajon Pass, California,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 15, No. 9, pp. 1005-1008, dated 1988.
Johnny Bardsen et al. “Improved Zonal Isolation in Open Hole Applications,” <https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-169190-MS?sort=&start=0&q=review+AND+%22packers%22+AND+%22open+hole%22&from_year=2001&peer_reviewed=&published_between=on&fromSearchResuts=true&to_year=&rows=50#>, SPE-169190-MS, 10 pages, dated 2014.
Jul. 23, 2008 Declaration of Daniel J. Themig, U.S. Appl. No. 12/058,337, filed Aug. 1, 2008.
Kamphuis, H., et al, “Multiple Fracture Stimulations in Horizontal Open-Hole Wells the Example of Well Boetersen Z9,” Germany, 1998 (SPE 50609), pp. 351-360.
Kogsball, Hans-Henrik, et al., Ceramic screens control proppant flowback in fracture-stimulated offshore wells, Aug. 2011, pp. 43-50.
Koloy, et al., “The Evolution, Optimization & Experience of Multistage Frac Completions in a North Sea Environment,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE-170641-MS, 2014; 15 pages.
Koshtorev, pp. 14-15, 1987, 2 pages.
Lagone, K.W. et al., SPE-530-PA—“A New Development in Completion Methods—The Limited Entry Technique,” Shell Oil Co., Jul. 1963, pp. 695-702.
Larsen, Frank P., et al., “Using 4000 ft Long Induced Fractures to Water Flood the Dan Field,” Sep. 1997 (SPE 38558), pp. 583-593.
Leonard John Kalfayan, “The Art and Practice of Acid Placement and Diversion: History, Present State, and Future,” <https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-124141-MS?sort=&start=0&q=%22horizontal+chalk+wells%22+AND+%22review%22+&from_year=&peer_reviewed=&published_between=&fromSearchResults=true&to_year=&rows=50#>, 124141-MS SPE Conference Paper, pp. 1-17, dated 2009.
Lohoefer, et al., “New Barnett Shale Horizontal Completion Lowers Cost and Improves Efficiency,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 103046, 2006; 9 pages.
Lynes ECPs and Cementing Tools, Baker catalog, pp. 89 and 87, dated 1988, 5 pages.
M.C. Vincent, “Proving It—A Review of 80 Published Field Studies Demonstrating the Importance of Increased Fracture Conductivity”, <https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-77675-MS?sort=&start=0&q=horizontal+open+hole+uncased+completions+AND+%22multistage%22&from_year=2001&peer_reviewed=&published_between=on&fromSearchResults=true&to_year=2005&rows=50#>, SPE-77675-MS, pp. 1-21, dated 2002.
M.R. Norris et al., “Hydraulic Fracturing for Reservoir Management: Production Enhancement, Scale Control and Asphaltine Prevention,” >https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-71655-MS?sort=&start=350&q=review+horizontal+open+hole+%28uncased%29+completions+AND+%22multi%22&from_year=&peer_reviewed=published_between=on&fromSearchResults=true&to_year=2001&rows=50#>, SPE-71655-MS, 12 pp., dated 2001.
Maddox, et al., “Cementless Multi-Zone Horizontal Completion Yields Three-Fold Increase,” IADC/SPE Drilling Conference, IADC/SPE 112774, 2008; 7 pages.
Martin P. Coronado et al., “Advanced Openhole Completions Utilizing a Simplified Zone Isolation System,” SPE 77438, pp. 1-11, Dated 2002.
Martin P. Coronado et al., “Development of a One-trip ECP Cement Inflation and Stage Cementing System for Open Hole Completions,” IADC/SPE-39345, pp. 473-481, dated 1998.
Martin, A.N., “Innovative Acid Fracturing Operations Used to Successfully Simulate Central North Sea Reservoir,” SPE 36620, pp. 479-486, dated 1996.
Mascara, S., et al, “Acidizing Deep Open-Hole Horizontal Wells: A case History on Selective Stimulation and Coil Tubing Deployed Jetting System,” 1999 (SPE 54738) 11 pages.
Mathur, et al., “Contrast Between Plug and Perf Method and Ball and Sleeve Method for Horizontal Well Stimulation,” Sep. 14, 2013; 12 pages.
Mazerov, Katie, “Innovative Systems Enhance Ability to Achieve Selective Isolated Production in Horizontal Wells”, Drilling Contractor, May/Jun. 2008, pp. 124-129.
McDaniel, B.W., et al, “Limited-Entry Frac Applications on Long Intervals of Highly Deviated or Horizontal Wells”, 1999, pp. 1-12 (SPE 56780).
Mitchell, et al., “First Successful Application of Horizontal Open Hole Multistage Completion Systems in Turkey's Selmo Field,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE-17077-MS, 2014; 9 pages.
Morali, Shirali C., An Innovative Single-Completion Design With Y-Block and ESP for Multiple Reservoirs, May 1990 (SPE-17663-PA) pp. 113-119.
Neftyanoe, Hozyaistvo, p. 42, 1993, 1 page.
Neftyanoe, Hozyaistvo, pp. 40-41, 1993, 2 pages.
Offshore Magazine “One Trip Completion Method,” dated Jul. 2001.
Olivier Lietard et al., “Hydraulic Fracturing of Horizontal Wells: An Update of Design and Execution Guidelines,” <https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-37122-MS?sort=&start=0&q=review+horizontal+open+hole+%28uncased%29+completions+AND+%22multistage%22&from_year=&peer_reviewed=published_between=on&fromSearchResults=true&to_year=2001&rows=50#>, SPE-37122-MS, pp. 723-737, dated 1996.
Order of Dismissal, Case No. CV-44,964, 238th Judicial District, Midland County, Texas, Oct. 14, 2008, 1 page.
Osisanya S. et al., “Design Criteria and Selection of Downhole Tools for Conducting Interference Tests in Horizontal Wells” SPE/CIM/CANMET International Conference on Recent Advances in Horizontal Well Applications, Mar. 20-23, 1994, Calgary, Canada, Paper No. HWC-94-58.
Otis Pumpdown Equipment and Services, OTIS Pumpdown Flow Control Equipment, Production Maintenance Utilizing Pumpdown Tools, OTIS Pumpdown Completion Equipment, 1974-75 Catalog.
Owen Oil Tools Mechanical Gun Release; 2⅜″ & 2⅞″ product description, 1 page, undated.
P. D. Ellis et al., “Application of Hydraulic Fractures in Openhole Horizontal Wells,” SPE-65464, 10 pages, dated 2000.
Packers Plus, Second Amended Original Answer in Cause No. CV-44964, 238th Judicial District of Texas, Feb. 13, 2007.
Packers Plus—New Technology, “RockSeal Open Hole Packers Series”, Dec. 21, 2005.
Packers Plus Energy Services Homepage, “Welcome to Packers Plus,” <http://packersplus.com/index.htm>, dated Feb. 23, 2000.
Packers Plus Energy Services, Inc. “5.1 RockSeal™ II Open Hole Packer Series,” <http://www.packersplus.com/rockseal%202.htm>, 2 pgs., dated 2004, available prior to Nov. 19, 2001.
Packers Plus Press Release, “Ken Paltzat Canadian Operations Manager for Packers Plus,” Dated Feb. 1, 2000.
Packers Plus, Original Answer in Cause No. CV-44964, 238th Judicial District of Texas, Feb. 13, 2007.
Paolo Gavioli et al., “The Evolution of the Role of Openhole Packers in Advanced Horizontal Completions: From Optional Accessory to Critical Key of Success,” <https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-132846-MS?sort=&start=0&q=%22packers%22+AND+%22open+hole%22+AND+%22review%22+AND+%22advanced%22&from_year=2010&peer_reviewed=&published_between=on&fromSearchResults=true&to_year=&rows=100#>, SPE-132846-PA, pp. 1-27, dated 2010.
PetroQuip Energy Services, BigFoot PetroQuip Case Study, Dec. 22, 2015; 1 page.
PetroQuip Energy Services, BigFoot Production Description, accessible at http://www.petroquip.com/index.php/2012-10-22-19-46-41/land-completions/big-foot, undated; 2 pages.
PetroQuip Energy Services, BigFoot Toe Sleeve PetroQuip Case Study, Nov. 2014; 2 pages.
Petro-Tech Tools, Inc., Dump Circulating Sub, Jul. 2, 1996, 3 pages.
Polar Completions Engineering Inc. Technical Manual, Jul. 5, 2001, Rev. 2, 13 pages.
Polar Completions Engineering, Bearfoot Packer 652-0000, 5 pages, Jul. 5, 2001.
R. Seale et al. “An Effective Horizontal Well Completion and Stimulation System,” Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, vol. 46, No. 12, pp. 73-77, dated Dec. 2007.
R.J. Tailby et al., “A New Technique for Servicing Horizontal Wells,” SPE-22823, pp. 43-58, Dated 1991.
Ricky Plauche and W. E. (Skip) Koshak, “Advances in Sliding Sleeve Technology and Coiled Tubing Performance Enhance Multizone Completion of Abnormally Pressured Gulf of Mexico Horizontal Well,” ICoTA, Apr. 1997 (SPE 38403).
Rockey Seale et al., “Effective Simulation of Horizontal Wells—A New Completion Method,” SPE-106357, 5 pages, dated 2006.
Ross, Elsie, “New Monitoring System Improves Understanding of Reservoirs”, New Tech Magazine Jan. 2001.
Rune Freyer, “Swelling Packer for Zonal Isolation in Open Hole Screen Completions,” SPE-78312, pp. 1-5, dated 2002.
Ryan Henderson, “Open Hole Completion Systems,” Tennessee Oil and Gas Association, dated 2014.
S. Mascarà, et al., “Acidizing Deep Open-Hole Horizontal Wells: A case History on Selective Stimulation and Coil Tubing Deployed Jetting System,” SPE-54738, pp. 1-11, dated 1999.
Sapex Oil Tools Ltd. Downhole Completions catalog, 24 pages, undated.
Seale, Rocky, “Open-Hole completions System Enables Multi-Stage Fracturing and Stimulation Along Horizontal Wellbores”, Drilling Contractor, Jul./Aug. 2007, pp. 112-114.
Suresh Jacob et al. “Advanced Well Completion Designs to Meet Unique Reservoir and Production Requirements,” <https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-172215-MS?sort=&start=0&q=review+AND+%22packers%22+AND+%22open+hole%22&from_year=2014&peer_reviewed=&published_between=on&fromSearchResults=true&to_year=rows=100#>, SPE-172215-MS, pp. 1-13, dated 2014.
T.P. Frick “State-Of-The-Art in the Matrix Stimulation of Horizontal Wells,” <https://www.onepetro.org/journal-paper/SPE-26997-PA?sort=&start=0&q=horizontal+open+hole+uncased+completions+AND+%22multistage%22&from_year=&peer_reviewed=&published_between=on&fromSearchResults=true&to_year=2001&rows=50#>, SPE-26997-PA, pp. 94-102, dated May 1996.
TAM Inflatable Zone Insolation Systems, TAM catalog, p. 5, dated 1994, 1 page.
Tam International, “Inflatable Bridge Plugs and Cement Retainers,” <http://tamintl.com/pages/plugg.htm>, Dated Oct. 22, 2000.
TAM Int'l, Inc., TAM Casing Annulus Packers and Accessories, pp. 14-15, 1994, 4 pages.
TAM Int'l, Inc., TAM Casing Annulus Packers and Accessories, pp. 4-5, 1994, 4 pages.
Team Oil, “Multi-Stage Fracturing—Orio Toe Valve,” TEAM Oil Tools, accessible at http://www.teamoiltools.com/ProductServices/Multistage-Fracturing-ORIO-Toe-Valve/, undated; 1 page.
Thomas Finkbeiner, “Reservoir Optimized Fracturing—Higher Productivity From Low-Permeability Reservoirs Through Customized Multistage Fracturing,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE-141371, pp. 1-16, dated 2011.
Top Tool Company, Hydraulic Perforation Wash Tool, 4 pages, undated.
Trahan, Kevin, Affidavit Exhibit C, May 19, 2008.
Trahan, Kevin, Affidavit Exhibit E, May 19, 2008.
Trahan, Kevin, Affidavit Exhibit G, May 19, 2008.
Trahan, Kevin, Affidavit, May 19, 2008.
Van Domelen, M.S., “Enhanced Profitability with Non-Conventional IOR Technology,” Oct. 1998 (SPE 49523), pp. 599-609.
White, Cameron, “Formation Characteristics dictate Completion Design”, Oil & Gas Journal, pp. 31-36, 1991.
Wong, F.Y. et al., “Developing a Field Strategy to Eliminate Crossflow Along a Horizontal Well,” SPE/CIM/CANMET International Conference on Recent Advances in Horizontal Well Applications, Mar. 20-23, 1994, Calgary, Canada, Paper No. HWC-94-24.
Yakovenko, et al, “Tests Results of the New Device for Open Bottom Hole Wells Cementing Operations,” May 2001, 3 pages.
Yuan, et al., “Improved Efficiency of Multi-Stage Fracturing Operations: An Innovative Pressure Activated Toe Sleeve,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE-172971-MS, 2015; 6 pages.
Yuan, et al., “Unlimited Multistage Frac Completion System: A Revolutionary Ball-Activated System with Single Size Balls,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 166303, 2013; 9 pages.
Information on RockSeal Open Hole Packers, these or similar packers believed to be publicly available in the US prior to Aug. 19, 2002.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20160069157 A1 Mar 2016 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60404783 Aug 2002 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10604807 Aug 2003 US
Child 11403957 US
Continuations (4)
Number Date Country
Parent 14150514 Jan 2014 US
Child 14738506 US
Parent 13455291 Apr 2012 US
Child 14150514 US
Parent 12830412 Jul 2010 US
Child 13455291 US
Parent 11403957 Apr 2006 US
Child 12208463 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 12208463 Sep 2008 US
Child 12830412 US