The invention relates to a method and apparatus for wellbore fluid treatment and, in particular, to a method and apparatus for selective communication to a wellbore for fluid treatment.
An oil or gas well relies on inflow of petroleum products. When drilling an oil or gas well, an operator may decide to leave productive intervals uncased (open hole) to expose porosity and permit unrestricted wellbore inflow of petroleum products. Alternately, the hole may be cased with a liner, which is then perforated to permit inflow through the openings created by perforating.
When natural inflow from the well is not economical, the well may require wellbore treatment termed stimulation. This is accomplished by pumping stimulation fluids such as fracturing fluids, acid, cleaning chemicals and/or proppant laden fluids to improve wellbore inflow.
In one previous method, the well is isolated in segments and each segment is individually treated so that concentrated and controlled fluid treatment can be provided along the wellbore. Often, in this method a tubing string is used with inflatable element packers thereabout which provide for segment isolation. The packers, which are inflated with pressure using a bladder, are used to isolate segments of the well and the tubing is used to convey treatment fluids to the isolated segment. Such inflatable packers may be limited with respect to pressure capabilities as well as durability under high pressure conditions. Generally, the packers are run for a wellbore treatment, but must be moved after each treatment if it is desired to isolate other segments of the well for treatment. This process can be expensive and time consuming. Furthermore, it may require stimulation pumping equipment to be at the well site for long periods of time or for multiple visits. This method can be very time consuming and costly.
Other procedures for stimulation treatments use foam diverters, gelled diverters and/or limited entry procedures through tubulars to distribute fluids. Each of these may or may not be effective in distributing fluids to the desired segments in the wellbore.
The tubing string, which conveys the treatment fluid, can include ports or openings for the fluid to pass therethrough into the borehole. Where more concentrated fluid treatment is desired in one position along the wellbore, a small number of larger ports are used. In another method, where it is desired to distribute treatment fluids over a greater area, a perforated tubing string is used having a plurality of spaced apart perforations through its wall. The perforations can be distributed along the length of the tube or only at selected segments. The open area of each perforation can be pre-selected to control the volume of fluid passing from the tube during use. When fluids are pumped into the liner, a pressure drop is created across the sized ports. The pressure drop causes approximate equal volumes of fluid to exit each port in order to distribute stimulation fluids to desired segments of the well. Where there are significant numbers of perforations, the fluid must be pumped at high rates to achieve a consistent distribution of treatment fluids along the wellbore.
In many previous systems, it is necessary to run the tubing string into the bore hole with the ports or perforations already opened. This is especially true where a distributed application of treatment fluid is desired such that a plurality of ports or perforations must be open at the same time for passage therethrough of fluid. This need to run in a tube already including open perforations can hinder the running operation and limit usefulness of the tubing string.
A method and apparatus has been invented which provides for selective communication to a wellbore for fluid treatment. In one aspect of the invention the method and apparatus provide for staged injection of treatment fluids wherein fluid is injected into selected intervals of the wellbore, while other intervals are closed. In another aspect, the method and apparatus provide for the running in of a fluid treatment string, the fluid treatment string having ports substantially closed against the passage of fluid therethrough, but which are openable when desired to permit fluid flow into the wellbore. The apparatus and methods of the present invention can be used in various borehole conditions including open holes, cased holes, vertical holes, horizontal holes, straight holes or deviated holes.
In one embodiment, there is provided an apparatus for fluid treatment of a borehole, the apparatus comprising a tubing string having a long axis, a first port opened through the wall of the tubing string, a second port opened through the wall of the tubing string, the second port offset from the first port along the long axis of the tubing string, a first packer operable to seal about the tubing string and mounted on the tubing string to act in a position offset from the first port along the long axis of the tubing string, a second packer operable to seal about the tubing string and mounted on the tubing string to act in a position between the first port and the second port along the long axis of the tubing string; a third packer operable to seal about the tubing string and mounted on the tubing string to act in a position offset from the second port along the long axis of the tubing string and on a side of the second port opposite the second packer; a first sleeve positioned relative to the first port, the first sleeve being moveable relative to the first port between a closed port position and a position permitting fluid flow through the first port from the tubing string inner bore and a second sleeve being moveable relative to the second port between a closed port position and a position permitting fluid flow through the second port from the tubing string inner bore; and a sleeve shifting means for moving the second sleeve from the closed port position to the position permitting fluid flow, the means for moving the second sleeve selected to create a seal in the tubing string against fluid flow past the second sleeve through the tubing string inner bore.
In one embodiment, the second sleeve has formed thereon a seat and the means for moving the second sleeve includes a sealing device selected to seal against the seat, such that fluid pressure can be applied to move the second sleeve and the sealing device can seal against fluid passage past the second sleeve. The sealing device can be, for example, a plug or a ball, which can be deployed without connection to surface. Thereby avoiding the need for tripping in a string or wire line for manipulation.
The means for moving the second sleeve can be selected to move the second sleeve without also moving the first sleeve. In one such embodiment, the first sleeve has formed thereon a first seat and the means for moving the first sleeve includes a first sealing device selected to seal against the first seat, such that once the first sealing device is seated against the first seat fluid pressure can be applied to move the first sleeve and the first sealing device can seal against fluid passage past the first sleeve and the second sleeve has formed thereon a second seat and the means for moving the second sleeve includes a second sealing device selected to seal against the second seat, such that when the second sealing device is seated against the second seat pressure can be applied to move the second sleeve and the second sealing device can seal against fluid passage past the second sleeve, the first seat having a larger diameter than the second seat, such that the second sealing device can move past the first seat without sealing thereagainst to reach and seal against the second seat.
In the closed port position, the first sleeve can be positioned over the first port to close the first port against fluid flow therethrough. In another embodiment, the first port has mounted thereon a cap extending into the tubing string inner bore and in the position permitting fluid flow, the first sleeve has engaged against and opened the cap. The cap can be opened, for example, by action of the first sleeve shearing the cap from its position over the port. In another embodiment, the apparatus further comprises a third port having mounted thereon a cap extending into the tubing string inner bore and in the position permitting fluid flow, the first sleeve also engages against the cap of the third port to open it.
In another embodiment, the first port has mounted thereover a sliding sleeve and in the position permitting fluid flow, the first sleeve has engaged and moved the sliding sleeve away from the first port. The sliding sleeve can include, for example, a groove and the first sleeve includes a locking dog biased outwardly therefrom and selected to lock into the groove on the sleeve. In another embodiment, there is a third port with a sliding sleeve mounted thereover and the first sleeve is selected to engage and move the third port sliding sleeve after it has moved the sliding sleeve of the first port.
The packers can be of any desired type to seal between the wellbore and the tubing string. In one embodiment, at least one of the first, second and third packer is a solid body packer including multiple packing elements. In such a packer, it is desirable that the multiple packing elements are spaced apart.
In view of the foregoing there is provided a method for fluid treatment of a borehole, the method comprising: providing an apparatus for wellbore treatment according to one of the various embodiments of the invention; running the tubing string into a wellbore in a desired position for treating the wellbore; setting the packers; conveying the means for moving the second sleeve to move the second sleeve and increasing fluid pressure to wellbore treatment fluid out through the second port.
In one method according to the present invention, the fluid treatment is borehole stimulation using stimulation fluids such as one or more of acid, gelled acid, gelled water, gelled oil, CO2, nitrogen and any of these fluids containing proppants, such as for example, sand or bauxite. The method can be conducted in an open hole or in a cased hole. In a cased hole, the casing may have to be perforated prior to running the tubing string into the wellbore, in order to provide access to the formation.
In an open hole, preferably, the packers include solid body packers including a solid, extrudable packing element and, in some embodiments, solid body packers include a plurality of extrudable packing elements.
In one embodiment, there is provided an apparatus for fluid treatment of a borehole, the apparatus comprising a tubing string having a long axis, a port opened through the wall of the tubing string, a first packer operable to seal about the tubing string and mounted on the tubing string to act in a position offset from the port along the long axis of the tubing string, a second packer operable to seal about the tubing string and mounted on the tubing string to act in a position offset from the port along the long axis of the tubing string and on a side of the port opposite the first packer; a sleeve positioned relative to the port, the sleeve being moveable relative to the port between a closed port position and a position permitting fluid flow through the port from the tubing string inner bore and a sleeve shifting means for moving the sleeve from the closed port position to the position permitting fluid flow. In this embodiment of the invention, there can be a second port spaced along the long axis of the tubing string from the first port and the sleeve can be moveable to a position permitting flow through the port and the second port.
As noted hereinbefore, the sleeve can be positioned in various ways when in the closed port position. For example, in the closed port position, the sleeve can be positioned over the port to close the port against fluid flow therethrough. Alternately, when in the closed port position, the sleeve can be offset from the port, and the port can be closed by other means such as by a cap or another sliding sleeve which is acted upon, as by breaking open or shearing the cap, by engaging against the sleeve, etc., by the sleeve to open the port.
There can be more than one port spaced along the long axis of the tubing string and the sleeve can act upon all of the ports to open them.
The sleeve can be actuated in any way to move into the position permitted fluid flow through the port. Preferably, however, the sleeve is actuated remotely, without the need to trip a work string such as a tubing string or a wire line. In one embodiment, the sleeve has formed thereon a seat and the means for moving the sleeve includes a sealing device selected to seal against the seat, such that fluid pressure can be applied to move the sleeve and the sealing device can seal against fluid passage past the sleeve.
The first packer and the second packer can be formed as a solid body packer including multiple packing elements, for example, in spaced apart relation.
In view of the forgoing there is provided a method for fluid treatment of a borehole, the method comprising: providing an apparatus for wellbore treatment including a tubing string having a long axis, a port opened through the wall of the tubing string, a first packer operable to seal about the tubing string and mounted on the tubing string to act in a position offset from the port along the long axis of the tubing string, a second packer operable to seal about the tubing string and mounted on the tubing string to act in a position offset from the port along the long axis of the tubing string and on a side of the port opposite the first packer; a sleeve positioned relative to the port, the sleeve being moveable relative to the port between a closed port position and a position permitting fluid flow through the port from the tubing string inner bore and a sleeve shifting means for moving the sleeve from the closed port position to the position permitting fluid flow; running the tubing string into a wellbore in a desired position for treating the wellbore; setting the packers; conveying the means for moving the sleeve to move the sleeve and increasing fluid pressure to permit the flow of wellbore treatment fluid out through the port.
A further, detailed, description of the invention, briefly described above, will follow by reference to the following drawings of specific embodiments of the invention. These drawings depict only typical embodiments of the invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope. In the drawings:
Referring to
A packer 20a is mounted between the upper-most ported interval 16a and the surface and further packers 20b to 20e are mounted between each pair of adjacent ported intervals. In the illustrated embodiment, a packer 20f is also mounted below the lower most ported interval 16e and lower end 14a of the tubing string. The packers are disposed about the tubing string and selected to seal the annulus between the tubing string and the wellbore wall, when the assembly is disposed in the wellbore. The packers divide the wellbore into isolated segments wherein fluid can be applied to one segment of the well, but is prevented from passing through the annulus into adjacent segments. As will be appreciated the packers can be spaced in any way relative to the ported intervals to achieve a desired interval length or number of ported intervals per segment. In addition, packer 20f need not be present in some applications.
The packers are of the solid body-type with at least one extrudable packing element, for example, formed of rubber. Solid body packers including multiple, spaced apart packing elements 21a, 21b on a single packer are particularly useful especially for example in open hole (unlined wellbore) operations. In another embodiment, a plurality of packers are positioned in side by side relation on the tubing string, rather than using one packer between each ported interval.
Sliding sleeves 22c to 22e are disposed in the tubing string to control the opening of the ports. In this embodiment, a sliding sleeve is mounted over each ported interval to close them against fluid flow therethrough, but can be moved away from their positions covering the ports to open the ports and allow fluid flow therethrough. In particular, the sliding sleeves are disposed to control the opening of the ported intervals through the tubing string and are each moveable from a closed port position covering its associated ported interval (as shown by sleeves 22c and 22d) to a position away from the ports wherein fluid flow of, for example, stimulation fluid is permitted through the ports of the ported interval (as shown by sleeve 22e).
The assembly is run in and positioned downhole with the sliding sleeves each in their closed port position. The sleeves are moved to their open position when the tubing string is ready for use in fluid treatment of the wellbore. Preferably, the sleeves for each isolated interval between adjacent packers are opened individually to permit fluid flow to one wellbore segment at a time, in a staged, concentrated treatment process.
Preferably, the sliding sleeves are each moveable remotely from their closed port position to their position permitting through-port fluid flow, for example, without having to run in a line or string for manipulation thereof. In one embodiment, the sliding sleeves are each actuated by a device, such as a ball 24e (as shown) or plug, which can be conveyed by gravity or fluid flow through the tubing string. The device engages against the sleeve, in this case ball 24e engages against sleeve 22e, and, when pressure is applied through the tubing string inner bore 18 from surface, ball 24e seats against and creates a pressure differential above and below the sleeve which drives the sleeve toward the lower pressure side.
In the illustrated embodiment, the inner surface of each sleeve which is open to the inner bore of the tubing string defines a seat 26e onto which an associated ball 24e, when launched from surface, can land and seal thereagainst. When the ball seals against the sleeve seat and pressure is applied or increased from surface, a pressure differential is set up which causes the sliding sleeve on which the ball has landed to slide to an port-open position. When the ports of the ported interval 16e are opened, fluid can flow therethrough to the annulus between the tubing string and the wellbore and thereafter into contact with formation 10.
Each of the plurality of sliding sleeves has a different diameter seat and therefore each accept different sized balls. In particular, the lower-most sliding sleeve 22e has the smallest diameter D1 seat and accepts the smallest sized ball 24e and each sleeve that is progressively closer to surface has a larger seat. For example, as shown in
Lower end 14a of the tubing string can be open, closed or fitted in various ways, depending on the operational characteristics of the tubing string which are desired. In the illustrated embodiment, includes a pump out plug assembly 28. Pump out plug assembly acts to close off end 14a during run in of the tubing string, to maintain the inner bore of the tubing string relatively clear. However, by application of fluid pressure, for example at a pressure of about 3000 psi, the plug can be blown out to permit actuation of the lower most sleeve 22e by generation of a pressure differential. As will be appreciated, an opening adjacent end 14a is only needed where pressure, as opposed to gravity, is needed to convey the first ball to land in the lower-most sleeve. Alternately, the lower most sleeve can be hydraulically actuated, including a fluid actuated piston secured by shear pins, so that the sleeve can be opened remotely without the need to land a ball or plug therein.
In other embodiments, not shown, end 14a can be left open or can be closed for example by installation of a welded or threaded plug.
While the illustrated tubing string includes five ported intervals, it is to be understood that any number of ported intervals could be used. In a fluid treatment assembly desired to be used for staged fluid treatment, at least two openable ports from the tubing string inner bore to the wellbore must be provided such as at least two ported intervals or an openable end and one ported interval. It is also to be understood that any number of ports can be used in each interval.
Centralizer 29 and other standard tubing string attachments can be used.
In use, the wellbore fluid treatment apparatus, as described with respect to
The apparatus is particularly useful for stimulation of a formation, using stimulation fluids, such as for example, acid, gelled acid, gelled water, gelled oil, CO2, nitrogen and/or proppant laden fluids.
Referring to
Packing element 21a is mounted between fixed stop ring 34a and compressing ring 34b and packing element 21b is mounted between fixed stop ring 34c and compressing ring 34d. The hydraulically actuated setting mechanism includes a port 35 through inner mandrel 32 which provides fluid access to a hydraulic chamber defined by first piston 36a and second piston 36b. First piston 36a acts against compressing ring 34b to drive compression and, therefore, expansion of packing element 21a, while second piston 36b acts against compressing ring 34d to drive compression and, therefore, expansion of packing element 21b. First piston 36a includes a skirt 37, which encloses the hydraulic chamber between the pistons and is telescopically disposed to ride over piston 36b. Seals 38 seal against the leakage of fluid between the parts. Mechanical body lock system 31, including for example a ratchet system, acts between skirt 37 and piston 36b permitting movement therebetween driving pistons 36a, 36b away from each other but locking against reverse movement of the pistons toward each other, thereby locking the packing elements into a compressed, expanded configuration.
Thus, the packer is set by pressuring up the tubing string such that fluid enters the hydraulic chamber and acts against pistons 36a, 36b to drive them apart, thereby compressing the packing elements and extruding them outwardly. This movement is permitted by body lock system 31 but is locked against retraction to lock the packing elements in extruded position.
Ring 34a includes shears 38 which mount the ring to mandrel 32. Thus, for release of the packing elements from sealing position the tubing string into which mandrel 32 is connected, can be pulled up to release shears 38 and thereby release the compressing force on the packing elements.
Referring to
The sub 40 includes threaded ends 42a, 42b for connection into a tubing string. Sub includes a wall 44 having formed on its inner surface a cylindrical groove 46 for retaining sleeve 22. Shoulders 46a, 46b define the ends of the groove 46 and limit the range of movement of the sleeve. Shoulders 46a, 46b can be formed in any way as by casting, milling, etc. the wall material of the sub or by threading parts together, as at connection 48. The tubing string if preferably formed to hold pressure. Therefore, any connection should, in the preferred embodiment, be selected to be substantially pressure tight.
In the closed port position, sleeve 22 is positioned adjacent shoulder 46a and over ports 17. Shear pins 50 are secured between wall 44 and sleeve 22 to hold the sleeve in this position. A ball 24 is used to shear pins 50 and to move the sleeve to the port-open position. In particular, the inner facing surface of sleeve 22 defines a seat 26 having a diameter Dseat, and ball 24, is sized, having a diameter Dball, to engage and seal against seat 26. When pressure is applied, as shown by arrows P, against ball 24, shears 50 will release allowing sleeve 22 to be driven against shoulder 46b. The length of the sleeve is selected with consideration as to the distance between shoulder 46b and ports 17 to permit the ports to be open, to some degree, when the sleeve is driven against shoulder 46b.
Preferably, the tubing string is resistant to fluid flow outwardly therefrom except through open ports and downwardly past a sleeve in which a ball is seated. Thus, ball 24 is selected to seal in seat 26 and seals 52, such as o-rings, are disposed in glands 54 on the outer surface of the sleeve, so that fluid bypass between the sleeve and wall 42 is substantially prevented.
Ball 24 can be formed of ceramics, steel, plastics or other durable materials and is preferably formed to seal against its seat.
When sub 40 is used in series with other subs, any subs in the tubing string below sub 40 have seats selected to accept balls having diameters less than Dseat and any subs in the tubing string above sub 40 have seats with diameters greater than the ball diameter Dball useful with seat 26 of sub 40.
In one embodiment, as shown in
In sub 60, sliding sleeve 62 is secured by means of shear pins 50 to cover ports 17. When sheared out, sleeve 62 can move within sub until it engages against no-go shoulder 68. Sleeve 62 includes a seat 26, glands 54 for seals 52 and a recess 70 for engagement by a retrieval tool (not shown). Since there is no upper shoulder on the sub, the sleeve can be removed by pulling it upwardly, as by use of a retrieval tool on wireline. This opens the tubing string inner bore to facilitate access through the tubing string such as by tools or production fluids. Where a series of these subs are used in a tubing string, the diameter across shoulders 68 should be graduated to permit passage of sleeves therebelow.
Flow control device 66 can be can be installed in any way in the sub. The flow control device acts to control inflow from the segments in the well through ports 17. In the illustrated embodiment, flow control device 66 includes a running neck 72, a lock section 74 including outwardly biased collet fingers 76 or dogs and a flow control section including a solid cylinder 78 and seals 80a, 80b disposed at either end thereof. Solid cylinder 78 is sized to cover the ports 17 of the sub 60 with seals 80a, 80b disposed above and below, respectively, the ports. Flow control device 66 can be conveyed by wire line or a tubing string such as coil tubing and is installed by engagement of collet fingers 76 in a groove 82 formed in the sub.
As shown in
In use, the tubing string is run into the well and the packers are placed between the perforated intervals. If blast joints are included in the tubing string, they are preferably positioned at the same depth as the perforated sections. The packers are then set by mechanical or pressure actuation. Once the packers are set, stimulation fluids are then pumped down the tubing string. The packers will divert the fluids to a specific segment of the wellbore. A ball or plug is then pumped to shut off the lower segment of the well and to open a siding sleeve to allow fluid to be forced into the next interval, where packers will again divert fluids into specific segment of the well. The process is continued until all desired segments of the wellbore are stimulated or treated. When completed, the treating fluids can be either shut in or flowed back immediately. The assembly can be pulled to surface or left downhole and produced therethrough.
Referring to
While the ports of interval 216c are open during run in of the tubing string, the ports of intervals 216b and 216a, are closed during run in and sleeves 222a and 222b are mounted within the tubing string and actuatable to selectively open the ports of intervals 216a and 216b, respectively. In particular, in
Once the tubing string is run into the well, stage 1 is initiated wherein stimulation fluids are pumped into the end section of the well to ported interval 216c to begin the stimulation treatment (
When desired to stimulate another section of the well (
After the desired volume of stimulation fluids are pumped, a slightly larger second ball or plug is injected into the tubing and pumped down the well, and will seat in sleeve 222a which is selected to retain the larger ball or plug. The force of the moving fluid will push sleeve 222a down the tubing string and as it moves down, it will open the ports in interval 216a. Once the sleeve reaches a desired depth as shown in
The above noted method can also be used for wellbore circulation to circulate existing wellbore fluids (drilling mud for example) out of a wellbore and to replace that fluid with another fluid. In such a method, a staged approach need not be used, but the sleeve can be used to open ports along the length of the tubing string. In addition, packers need not be used as it is often desirable to circulate the fluids to surface through the wellbore.
The sleeves 222a and 222b can be formed in various ways to cooperate with ports 217 to open those ports as they pass through the tubing string.
With reference to
Sleeve 222 is mounted in the tubing string and includes an outer surface having a diameter to substantially conform to the inner diameter of, but capable of sliding through, the section of the tubing string in which the sleeve is selected to act. Sleeve 222 is mounted in tubing string by use of a shear pin 250 and has a seat 226 formed on its inner facing surface to accept a selected sized ball 224, which when fluid pressure is applied therebehind, arrow P, will shear pin 250 and drive the sleeve, with the ball seated therein along the length of the tubing string until stopped by shoulder 246.
Sleeve 222 includes a profiled leading end 247 which is selected to shear or cut off the protective caps 223 from the ports as it passes, thereby opening the ports. Shoulder 246 is preferably spaced from the ports 217 with consideration as to the length of sleeve 222 such that when the sleeve is stopped against the shoulder, the sleeve does not cover any ports.
Sleeve 222 can include seals 252 to seal between the interface of the sleeve and the tubing string, where it is desired to seal off fluid flow therebetween.
Caps can also be used to close off ports disposed in a plane orthogonal to the long axis of the tubing string, if desired.
Referring to
Ports 317a, 317b each include a sliding sleeve 325a, 325b, respectively, in association therewith. In particular, with reference to port 317a, each port includes an associated sliding sleeve disposed in a cylindrical groove, defined by shoulders 327a, 327b about the port. The groove is formed in the inner wall of the tubing string and sleeve 325a is selected to have an inner diameter that is generally equal to the tubing string inner diameter and an outer diameter that substantially conforms to but is slidable along the groove between shoulders 327a, 327b. Seals 329 are provided between sleeve 325a and the groove, such that fluid leakage therebetween is substantially avoided.
Sliding sleeves 325a are normally positioned over their associated port 317a adjacent shoulder 327a, but can be slid along the groove until stopped by shoulder 327b. In each case, the shoulder 327b is spaced from its port 317a with consideration as to the length of the associated sleeve so that when the sleeve is butted against shoulder 327b, the port is open to allow at least some fluid flow therethrough.
The port-associated sliding sleeves 325a, 325b are each formed to be engaged and moved by sleeve 322 as it passes through the tubing string from its pinned position to its position against shoulder 346. In the illustrated embodiments, sleeves 325a, 325b are moved by engagement of outwardly biased dogs 351 on the sleeve 322. In particular, each sleeve 325a, 325b includes a profile 353a, 353b into which dogs 351 can releasably engage. The spring force of dogs and the configuration of profile 353 are together selected to be greater than the resistance of sleeve 325 moving within the groove, but less than the fluid pressure selected to be applied against ball 324, such that when sleeve 322 is driven through the tubing string, it will engage against each sleeve 325a to move it away from its port 317a and against its associated shoulder 327b. However, continued application of fluid pressure will drive the dogs 351 of the sleeve 322 against their spring force to remove the sleeve from engagement with a first port-associated sleeve 325a, along the tubing string 314 and into engagement with the profile 353b of the next-port associated sleeve 325b and so on, until sleeve 322 is stopped against shoulder 346.
Referring to
In this embodiment, a tubing or casing string 414 is made up with two ported intervals 316b, 316d formed of subs having a series of size restricted ports 317 therethrough and in which the ports are each covered, for example, with protective pressure holding internal caps and in which each interval includes a movable sleeve 322b, 322d with profiles that can act as a cutter to cut off the protective caps to open the ports. Other ported intervals 16a, 16c include a plurality of ports 17 disposed about a circumference of the tubing string and are closed by a ball or plug activated sliding sleeves 22a, 22c. Packers 420a, 420b, 420c, 420d are disposed between each interval to create isolated segments along the wellbore 412.
Once the system is run into the well (
Sections of the well that use a “sprinkler approach”, intervals 316b, 316d, will be treated as follows: When desired, a ball or plug is pumped down the well, and will seat in one of the cutter sleeves 322b, 322d. The force of the moving fluid will push the cutter sleeve down the tubing string and as it moves down, it will remove the pressure holding caps from the segment of the well through which it passes. Once the cutter reaches a desired depth, it will be stopped by a no-go shoulder and the ball will remain in the sleeve effectively shutting off the lower segment of the well. Stimulation fluids are then pumped as required.
Segments of the well that use a “focused stimulation approach”, intervals 16a, 16c, will be treated as follows: Another ball or plug is launched and will seat in and shift open a pressure shifted sliding sleeve 22a, 22c, and block off the lower segment(s) of the well. Stimulation fluids are directed out the ports 17 exposed for fluid flow by moving the sliding sleeve.
Fluid passing through each interval is contained by the packers 420a to 420d on either side of that interval to allow for treating only that section of the well.
The stimulation process can be continued using “sprinkler” and/or “focused” placement of fluids, depending on the segment which is opened along the tubing string.
This is a continuation application of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/612,533, filed Sep. 12, 2012 which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 12/966,849, filed Dec. 13, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,397,820 issued Mar. 19, 2013, which is a continuation of US application Ser. No. 12/471,174, filed May 22, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,861,774, issued Jan. 4, 2011, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/550,863, filed Oct. 19, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,543,634, issued Jun. 9, 2009, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/104,467, filed Apr. 13, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,134,505, issued Nov. 14, 2006, which is a divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/299,004, filed Nov. 19, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,907,936, issued Jun. 21, 2005. The parent applications and the present application claim priority from U.S. provisional application 60/331,491, filed Nov. 19, 2001 and U.S. provisional application 60/404,783, filed Aug. 21, 2002.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
958100 | Decker | May 1910 | A |
1510669 | Halliday | Oct 1924 | A |
1785277 | Mack | Dec 1930 | A |
1956694 | Parrish | May 1934 | A |
2121002 | Baker | Jun 1938 | A |
2153034 | Baker | Apr 1939 | A |
2201299 | Owsley et al. | May 1940 | A |
2212087 | Thornhill | Aug 1940 | A |
2227539 | Dorton | Jan 1941 | A |
2248511 | Rust | Jul 1941 | A |
2249511 | Westall | Jul 1941 | A |
2287076 | Zachry | Jun 1942 | A |
2330267 | Burt et al. | Sep 1943 | A |
2352700 | Ferris | Jul 1944 | A |
2493650 | Baker et al. | Jan 1950 | A |
2537066 | Lewis | Jan 1951 | A |
2593520 | Baker et al. | Apr 1952 | A |
2606616 | Otis | Aug 1952 | A |
2618340 | Lynd | Nov 1952 | A |
2659438 | Schnitter | Nov 1953 | A |
2715444 | Fewwl | Aug 1955 | A |
2731827 | Loomis | Jan 1956 | A |
2737244 | Baker et al. | Mar 1956 | A |
2752861 | Hill | Jul 1956 | A |
2764244 | Page | Sep 1956 | A |
2771142 | Sloan et al. | Nov 1956 | A |
2780294 | Loomis | Feb 1957 | A |
2807955 | Loomis | Oct 1957 | A |
2836250 | Brown | May 1958 | A |
2841007 | Loomis | Jul 1958 | A |
2851109 | Spearow | Sep 1958 | A |
2860489 | Townsend | Nov 1958 | A |
2869645 | Chamberlain et al. | Jan 1959 | A |
2945541 | Maly et al. | Jul 1960 | A |
2947363 | Sackett et al. | Aug 1960 | A |
3007523 | Vincent | Nov 1961 | A |
3035639 | Brown et al. | May 1962 | A |
3038542 | Loomis | Jun 1962 | A |
3054415 | Baker et al. | Sep 1962 | A |
3059699 | Brown | Oct 1962 | A |
3062291 | Brown | Nov 1962 | A |
3068942 | Brown | Dec 1962 | A |
3083771 | Chapman | Apr 1963 | A |
3083775 | Nielson et al. | Apr 1963 | A |
3095040 | Bramlett | Jun 1963 | A |
3095926 | Rush | Jul 1963 | A |
3122205 | Brown et al. | Feb 1964 | A |
3148731 | Holden | Sep 1964 | A |
3153845 | Loomis | Oct 1964 | A |
3154940 | Loomis | Nov 1964 | A |
3158378 | Loomis | Nov 1964 | A |
3165918 | Loomis | Jan 1965 | A |
3165919 | Loomis | Jan 1965 | A |
3165920 | Loomis | Jan 1965 | A |
3193917 | Loomis | Jul 1965 | A |
3194310 | Loomis | Jul 1965 | A |
3195645 | Loomis | Jul 1965 | A |
3199598 | Loomis | Aug 1965 | A |
3263752 | Conrad | Aug 1966 | A |
3265132 | Edwards, Jr. | Aug 1966 | A |
3270814 | Richardson et al. | Sep 1966 | A |
3289762 | Schell et al. | Dec 1966 | A |
3291219 | Nutter | Dec 1966 | A |
3311169 | Hefley et al. | Mar 1967 | A |
3333639 | Page et al. | Aug 1967 | A |
3361209 | Edwards, Jr. | Jan 1968 | A |
3427653 | Jensen | Feb 1969 | A |
3460626 | Ehrlich | Aug 1969 | A |
3517743 | Pumpelly et al. | Jun 1970 | A |
3523580 | Lebourg | Aug 1970 | A |
3552718 | Schwegman | Jan 1971 | A |
3587736 | Brown | Jun 1971 | A |
3645335 | Current | Feb 1972 | A |
3659648 | Cobbs | May 1972 | A |
3661207 | Current et al. | May 1972 | A |
3687202 | Young et al. | Aug 1972 | A |
3730267 | Scott | May 1973 | A |
3784325 | Coanda et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3860068 | Abney et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
3948322 | Baker | Apr 1976 | A |
3981360 | Marathe | Sep 1976 | A |
4018272 | Brown et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
4031957 | Sanford | Jun 1977 | A |
4044826 | Crowe | Aug 1977 | A |
4099563 | Hutchison et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4143712 | James et al. | Mar 1979 | A |
4161216 | Amancharia | Jul 1979 | A |
4162691 | Perkins | Jul 1979 | A |
4216827 | Crowe | Aug 1980 | A |
4229397 | Fukuta et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4279306 | Weitz | Jul 1981 | A |
4286662 | Page | Sep 1981 | A |
4298077 | Emery | Nov 1981 | A |
4299287 | Vann et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4299397 | Baker et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4315542 | Dockins | Feb 1982 | A |
4324293 | Hushbeck | Apr 1982 | A |
4338999 | Carter, Jr. | Jul 1982 | A |
4421165 | Szarka | Dec 1983 | A |
4423777 | Mullins et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4436152 | Fisher, Jr. et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4441558 | Welch et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4469174 | Freeman | Sep 1984 | A |
4484625 | Barbee, Jr. | Nov 1984 | A |
4494608 | Williams et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4498536 | Ross et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4499951 | Vann | Feb 1985 | A |
4516879 | Berry et al. | May 1985 | A |
4519456 | Cochron | May 1985 | A |
4520870 | Pringle | Jun 1985 | A |
4524825 | Fore | Jun 1985 | A |
4552218 | Ross et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4567944 | Zunkel et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4569396 | Brisco | Feb 1986 | A |
4576234 | Upchurch | Mar 1986 | A |
4577702 | Faulkner | Mar 1986 | A |
4590995 | Evans | May 1986 | A |
4605062 | Klumpyan et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4610308 | Meek | Sep 1986 | A |
4632193 | Geczy | Dec 1986 | A |
4637471 | Soderberg | Jan 1987 | A |
4640355 | Hong et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4645007 | Soderberg | Feb 1987 | A |
4646829 | Barrington et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4655286 | Wood | Apr 1987 | A |
4657084 | Evans | Apr 1987 | A |
4714117 | Dech | Dec 1987 | A |
4716967 | Mohaupt | Jan 1988 | A |
4754812 | Gentry | Jul 1988 | A |
4791992 | Greenlee et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4794989 | Mills | Jan 1989 | A |
4823882 | Stokley et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4880059 | Brandell et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4893678 | Stokley et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4903777 | Jordan, Jr. et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4907655 | Hromas | Mar 1990 | A |
4909326 | Owen | Mar 1990 | A |
4928772 | Hopmann | May 1990 | A |
4949788 | Szarka et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4967841 | Murray | Nov 1990 | A |
4979561 | Szarka | Dec 1990 | A |
4991654 | Brandell et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5020600 | Coronado | Jun 1991 | A |
5048611 | Cochran | Sep 1991 | A |
5103901 | Greenlee | Apr 1992 | A |
5146992 | Baugh | Sep 1992 | A |
5152340 | Clark et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5172717 | Boyle et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5174379 | Whiteley et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5180015 | Ringgenberg et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5186258 | Wood et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5197543 | Coulter | Mar 1993 | A |
5197547 | Morgan | Mar 1993 | A |
5217067 | Landry et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5221267 | Folden | Jun 1993 | A |
5242022 | Burton et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5261492 | Duell et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5271462 | Berzin | Dec 1993 | A |
5325924 | Bangert et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5332038 | Tapp et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5335732 | McIntyre | Aug 1994 | A |
5337808 | Graham | Aug 1994 | A |
5351752 | Wood | Oct 1994 | A |
5355953 | Shy et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5375662 | Echols, III et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5394941 | Venditto et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5411095 | Ehlinger et al. | May 1995 | A |
5413180 | Ross et al. | May 1995 | A |
5425423 | Dobson et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5449039 | Hartley et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5454430 | Kennedy et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5464062 | Blizzard, Jr. | Nov 1995 | A |
5472048 | Kennedy et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5479989 | Shy et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5499687 | Lee | Mar 1996 | A |
5526880 | Jordan, Jr. et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5533571 | Surjaatmadja et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5533573 | Jordan, Jr. et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5542473 | Pringle | Aug 1996 | A |
5558153 | Holcombe et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5579844 | Rebardi et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5609178 | Hennig et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5615741 | Coronado | Apr 1997 | A |
5641023 | Ross et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5701954 | Kilgore et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5711375 | Ravi et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5715891 | Graham et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5732776 | Tubel et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5775429 | Arizmendi et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5782303 | Christian | Jul 1998 | A |
5791414 | Skinner et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5810082 | Jordan, Jr. | Sep 1998 | A |
5826662 | Beck et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5865254 | Huber et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5894888 | Wiemers et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5921318 | Ross | Jul 1999 | A |
5934372 | Muth | Aug 1999 | A |
5941307 | Tubel | Aug 1999 | A |
5941308 | Malone et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5947198 | McKee et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5954133 | Ross | Sep 1999 | A |
5960881 | Allamon et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6003607 | Hagen et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006834 | Skinner | Dec 1999 | A |
6006838 | Whiteley et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6009944 | Gudmestad | Jan 2000 | A |
6041858 | Arizmendi | Mar 2000 | A |
6047773 | Zeltmann et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6053250 | Echols | Apr 2000 | A |
6059033 | Ross et al. | May 2000 | A |
6065541 | Allen | May 2000 | A |
6070666 | Montgomery | Jun 2000 | A |
6079493 | Longbottom et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6082458 | Schnatzmeyer | Jul 2000 | A |
6098710 | Rhein-Knudsen et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6109354 | Ringgenberg et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112811 | Kilgore et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6131663 | Henley et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6148915 | Mullen et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6155350 | Melenyzer | Dec 2000 | A |
6186236 | Cox | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6189619 | Wyatt et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6220353 | Foster et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6220357 | Carmichael et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6220360 | Connell et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6227298 | Patel | May 2001 | B1 |
6230811 | Ringgenberg et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241013 | Martin | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6250392 | Muth | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253861 | Carmichael et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6257338 | Kilgore | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6279651 | Schwendemann et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6286600 | Hall et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6302199 | Hawkins et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6305470 | Woie | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311776 | Pringle et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6315041 | Carlisle et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6347668 | McNeill | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6349772 | Mullen et al. | Feb 2002 | B2 |
6388577 | Carstensen | May 2002 | B1 |
6390200 | Allamon et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6394184 | Tolman et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6446727 | Zemlak et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6460619 | Braithwaite et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6464006 | Womble | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6467546 | Allamon et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6488082 | Echols et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6491103 | Allamon et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6520255 | Tolman et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6543538 | Tolman et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6543543 | Muth | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6543545 | Chatterji et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6547011 | Kilgore | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6571869 | Pluchek et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6591915 | Burris | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6634428 | Krauss et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6651743 | Szarka | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6695057 | Ingram et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6695066 | Allamon et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6722440 | Turner et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6725934 | Coronado et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6752212 | Burris et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6763885 | Cavender | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6782948 | Echols et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6820697 | Churchill | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6883610 | Depiak | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6907936 | Fehr et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6951331 | Haughom et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
7021384 | Themig | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7066265 | Surjaatmadja | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7096954 | Weng et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7108060 | Jones | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7108067 | Themig et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7134505 | Fehr et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7152678 | Turner et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7198110 | Kilgore et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7231987 | Kilgore et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7240733 | Hayes et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7243723 | Surjaatmadja | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7267172 | Hofman | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7353878 | Themig | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7377321 | Rytlewski | May 2008 | B2 |
7431091 | Themig et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7543634 | Fehr et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7571765 | Themig | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7748460 | Themig et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7832472 | Themig | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7861774 | Fehr et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8167047 | Themig et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8215411 | Flores et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8276675 | Williamson | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8281866 | Tessier et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8291980 | Fay | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8393392 | Mytopher et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8397820 | Fehr et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8490685 | Tolman et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8657009 | Themig et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8714272 | Garcia et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8746343 | Fehr et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8757273 | Themig et al. | Jun 2014 | B2 |
8978773 | Tilley | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8997849 | Lea-Wilson et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9074451 | Themig et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9121264 | Tokarek | Sep 2015 | B2 |
20010009189 | Brooks et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010015275 | van Petegem et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010018977 | Kilgore | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010050170 | Woie et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020007949 | Tolman et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020020535 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020096328 | Echols et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020112857 | Ohmer et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020117301 | Womble | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020162660 | Depiak et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030127227 | Fehr et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040000406 | Allamon et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040055752 | Restarick et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050061508 | Surjaatmadja | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060048950 | Dybevik et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070119598 | Turner et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070151734 | Fehr et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070272411 | Lopez De Cardenas et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070272413 | Rytlewski et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080017373 | Jones et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080223587 | Cherewyk | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090084553 | Rytlewski et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100132959 | Tinker | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110127047 | Themig et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110180274 | Wang et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120067583 | Zimmerman et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120085548 | Fleckenstein et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20130014953 | van Petegem | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130043042 | Flores et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20140096970 | Andrew et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140290944 | Kristoffer | Oct 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2412072 | May 2003 | CA |
2838092 | Mar 2014 | CA |
0094170 | Nov 1983 | EP |
0724065 | Jul 1996 | EP |
0802303 | Apr 1997 | EP |
0823538 | Feb 1998 | EP |
0950794 | Oct 1999 | EP |
0985797 | Mar 2000 | EP |
0985799 | Mar 2000 | EP |
2311315 | Sep 1997 | GB |
WO 9736089 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO 0106086 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0169036 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 2007017353 | Feb 2007 | WO |
WO 2009132462 | Nov 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Halliburton Retrievable Service Tools, product brochure, 15 pages, undated. |
Halliburton “Halliburton Guiberson® G-77 Hydraulic-Set Retrievable Packer,” 6 pages, undated. |
Baker Oil Tools, “Retrievable Packer Systems,” product brochure, 1 page, undated. |
Drawings, Packer Installation Plan, PACK 05543, 5 pages, 1997. |
Guiberson•AVA & Dresser, Retrievable Packer Systems, “Tandem Packer,” 1 page, undated. |
Halliburton, “Hydraulic-Set Guiberson™ Wizard Packer®,” 1 page, undated. |
D.W. Thomson, “Design and Installation of a Cost-Effective Completion System for Horizontal Chalk Wells Where Multiple Zones Require Acid Stimulation,” SPE Drilling & Completion, Sep. 1998, pp. 151-156. |
Packers Plus Energy Services, Inc. “5.1 RockSeal™ II Open Hole Packer Series,” 2 pages, 2004. |
Halliburton Guiberson G-77 Hydraulic-Set Retrievable Packer presentation, 6 pages, undated. |
Owen Oil Tools Mechanical Gun Release; 2-3/8″ 2-7/8″ product description, 1 page, undated. |
Sapex Oil Tools Ltd. Downhole Completions catalog, 24 pages, undated. |
Halliburton, catalog, pp. 51-54, 1957. |
Baker Hughes, catalog, pp. 66-73, 1991. |
Trahan, Kevin, Affidavit, May 19, 2008. |
Trahan, Kevin, Affidavit Exhibit C, May 19, 2008. |
Trahan, Kevin, Affidavit Exhibit E, May 19, 2008. |
Trahan, Kevin, Affidavit Exhibit G, May 19, 2008. |
Baker Oil Tools, catalog, p. 29, Model “C” Packing Element Circulating Washer, Product No. 470-42, Mar. 1997. |
Guiberson-AVA Dresser, catalog, front page and pp. 1 & 20, 1994. |
Baker Oil Tools, catalog, p. 38, Twin Seal Submersible Pumppacker, undated. |
Halliburton, Plaintiffs Fourth Amended Petition in Cause No. CV-44964, 238th Judicial District of Texas, Aug. 13, 2007. |
Packers Plus, Second Amended Original Answer in Cause No. CV-44964, 238th Judicial District of Texas, Feb. 13, 2007. |
Packers Plus, Original Answer in Cause No. CV-44964, 238th Judicial District of Texas, Feb. 13, 2007. |
Guiberson AVA, Packer Installation Plan, Aug. 26, 1997. |
Guiberson AVA, Packer Installation Plan, Sep. 9, 1997. |
Guiberson AVA, Packer Installation Plan, Nov. 11, 1997. |
Guiberson AVA, Wizard II Hydraulic Set Retrievable Packer Tech Manual, Apr. 1998. |
Dresser Oil Tools, catalog, Multilateral Completion Tools Section, undated. |
Dresser Oil Tools, catalog, Technical Section, title page and p. 18, Nov. 1997. |
Berryman, William, First Supplemental Expert Report in Cause No. CV-44964, 238th Judicial District of Texas, undated. |
Brown Oil Tools, catalog page, entitled “Brown Hydraulic Set Packers,”, undated. |
Brown Oil Tools, catalog page, entitled “Brown HS-16-1 Hydraulic Set Retrievable Packers,”, undated. |
Brown Oil Tools General Catalog 1962-63, Hydraulic Set Packers and Hydraulic Set Retrievable Packers, pp. 870-871, undated. |
First Supplemental Expert Report of Kevin Trahan, Case No. CV-44,964, 238th Judicial District, Midland County, Texas, Aug. 21, 2008, 28 pages. |
Order of Dismissal, Case No. CV-44,964, 238th Judicial District, Midland County, Texas, Oct. 14, 2008, 1 page. |
238th District Court, Midland, Texas, Case No. CV44964, Exhibit 6, Deposition of Daniel Jon Themig, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, dated Jan. 17, 2006, parts 1 and 2 total for a total of 82 pages with redactions from page 336, Line 10 through all of p. 337. |
238th District Court, Midland, Texas, Case No. CV44964, Exhibit 7, Deposition of Daniel Jon Themig, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, dated Jan. 8, 2007, 75 pages with redactions from p. 716, Line 23 through p. 726, Line 22. |
238th District Court, Midland, Texas, Case No. CV44964, Exhibit 8, Deposition of Daniel Jon Themig, Calgary, Alberta, Canada, dated Jan. 9, 2007, 46 pages with redactions on p. 850, Lines 13-19. |
238th District Court, Midland, Texas, Case No. CV44964, Exhibit 9, Cross-examination of Daniel Jon Themig, in the Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta, Canada, dated Mar. 14, 2005, 67 pages. |
238th District Court, Midland, Texas, Case No. CV44964, Exhibit 10, Deposition of William Sloane Muscroft, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, dated Mar. 31, 2007, parts 1 and 2 for a total of 111 pages. |
238th District Court, Midland, Texas, Case No. CV44964, Exhibit 11, Email from William Sloane Muscroft to Peter Krabben dated Jan. 27, 2000, 1 page. |
238th District Court, Midland, Texas, Case No. CV44964, Exhibit 12, Email from William Sloane Muscroft to Daniel Jon Themig dated Feb. 1, 2000, 1 page. |
238th District Court, Midland, Texas, Case No. C.V.4.4.96.4, Exhibit 13, Email from Daniel Jon Themig to William Sloane Muscroft dated Jun. 19, 2000, 2 pages. |
Design and Installation of a Cost-Effective Completion System for Horizontal Chalk Wells Where Multiple Zones Require Acid Stimulation, D. W. Thompson, SPE Drilling & Completion, Sep. 1998, pp. 151-156. |
http://www.packersplus.com/rockseal%202.htm description of open hole packer, available prior to Nov. 19, 2001. |
A.B. Yost et al., “Production and Stimulation Analysis of Multiple Hydraulic Fracturing of a 2,000-ft Horizontal Well,” SPE-19090, 14 pages, dated 1989. |
A.P. Bunger et al., “Experimental Investigation of the Interaction Among Closely Spaced Hydraulic Fractures,” <https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/ARMA-11-318?sort=&start=0&q=review+AND+%22packers%22+AND+%22uncased+%22&from—year=2001&peer—reviewed=&published—between=on&fromSearchResults=true&to—year=&rows=50#>, ARMA-11-318, 11 pages, dated 2011. |
Alfred M. Jackson et al., “Completion and Stimulation Challenges and Solutions for Extended-Reach Multizone Horizontal Wells in Carbonate Formations,”<https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-141812-MS?&sort=& start=0&q=uncase+packer&from—year=2001&peer—reviewed=&published—between=on&fromSearchResults=true&to—year=&rows=50#>, SPE-141812-MS, 11 pages, dated 2011. |
Anderson, Svend Aage, et al., “Exploiting Reservoirs with Horizontal Wells: the Maersk Experience,” Oilfield Review, vol. 2, No. 3, Jul. 11-21, 1990. |
Angeles, et al., “One Year of Just-In-Time Perforating as Multi-Stage Fracturing Technique for Horizontal Wells,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 160034, 2012; 12 pages. |
Arguijo, et al., “Streamlined Completions Process: An Eagle Ford Shale Case History,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 162658, 2012; 17 pages. |
B.W. McDaniel et al., “Overview of Stimulation Technology for Horizontal Completions without Cemented Casing in the Lateral,” SPCE-77825, pp. 1-17, dated 2002. |
Baker Packers, Flow Control Systems, 2 pages, 1982-83. |
Baihly, Jason, et al, “Sleeve Activation in Open-hole Fracturing Systems: A Ball Selection Study”, Oct. 30-Nov. 1, 2012 (SPE Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference; SPE 162657), pp. 1-14, 2012. |
Baker CAC, A Baker Hughes company, 1990-91 Condensed Catalog, 1990-91, 8 pages. |
Baker Hughes Baker Oil Tools, Packer Systems Product Catalog, 152 pages. |
Baker Hughes, “Intelligent Well Systems™,” bakerhughes.com, dated Jun. 7, 2001. |
Baker Hughes, Baker Oil Tools, “Cased Hole Applications,” 95 pages. |
Baker Hughes, BakerOil Tools, “Open Hole Completion Systems”, 3 pages, 2004. |
Baker Hughes,“Re-entry Systems Technology,” <http://www.bakerhughes.com/Bot/iws/index.htm>, Dated 1999. |
Baker Oil Tools Press Release, “The Edge, Electronically Enhanced Remote Autuation System,” dated Jun. 10, 1996. |
Baker Oil Tools product advertisements allegedly from 1948-1969, 70 pages. |
Baker Oil Tools Product Announcements, “Baker Oil Tools' HCM Remote Controlled Hydraulic Sliding Sleeve,”<http://www.bakerhughes.com/Bot/Pressroom/hcm.htm>, Dated Aug. 16, 2000. |
Baker Oil Tools, “Baker Oil ToolsRegion/Area Locations,” 2 pages. |
Baker Oil Tools, “Packer Systems”, 78 pages, undated. |
Baker Oil Tools, “Plugging Devices”, Model ‘E’™ Hydro-Trip Sub, undated, 1 page. |
Baker Oil Tools, “Retrievable Packer Systems, Model ‘E’™ Hydro-Trip Pressure Sub—Product No. 799-28”, undated, 1 page. |
Baker Oil Tools, “Retrievable Packer Systems,” product catalog, 60 pages. |
Baker Oil Tools, Inc., “Technical Manual: Stage Cementing Equipment—Models “J” & “JB” Stage Cementing Collars” Aug. 1, 1966, 14 pages. |
Baker Oil Tools, Inflatable Systems, pp. 1-50, undated, 50 pages. |
Baker Oil Tools, Inflatable Systems, pp. 1-66, undated, 66 pages. |
Baker Oil Tools, New Product Fact Sheet Retrievable Packer Systems, Model “PC” Hydraulic Isolation Packer Product No. 784-07, Jun. 1988, 2 pages. |
Baker Oil Tools, Packer Systems Press Release, “Edge™ Remote Actuation System Successfully Sets Packer in Deepwater Gulf of Mexico,” dated Jun. 10, 1996, modified Apr. 1998. |
Baker Oil Tools' Archived Product Catalogs, 963 pages. |
Baker Packers Flow Control Equipment, Bulletin No. BFC-1-6/83, 142 pages. |
Baker Packers, “Seating Nipples” and “Accessories for Sliding Sleeves”, pp. 13, 32-33, 99, 104-107, 110, 111, 114-115, undated. |
Baker Packers, “Tool Identification by Model Number” and “Accessories for Selective and Top No-Go Seating Nipples”, 4 pages. |
Baker Sand Control, Open Hole Gravel Packing, undated, 1 page. |
Baker Service Tools, Catalog: Lynes Inflatable Products, 5 pages, undated. |
Baker Service Tools, Washing Tools, 1 pages, undated. |
Baker, Ron, “A Primer of Oil Well Drilling,” Petroleum Extension Service, 5th ed. rev., 1996. |
Bill Ellsworth et al., “Production Control of Horizontal Wells in a Carbonate Reef Structure,” 1999 CIM Horizontal Well Conference, 10 pages. |
Billy W. McDaniel “Review of Current Fracture Stimulation Techniques for Best Economics in Multi-layer, Lower Permeability Reservoirs,” <https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-98025-MS?sort=&start=0&q=review+horizontal+open+hole+%28uncased%29+completions+AND+%22multistage%22&from—year=2001&peer—reviewed=&published—between=on&fromSearchResults=true&to—year=2005&rows=50>, SPE-98025-MS, 19 pages, dated 2005. |
BJ Services, Excape Completion Process, 12 pages, undated. |
Brazil Oil & Gas, Norway Oil & Gas, 2009—Issue 10 Saudi Arabia Oil and Gas, 100 pages. |
“Brown Type Open Hole Packer”, Brown 1986-1987 Catalog, 1 page. |
Brown Hughes, Hughes Production Tools General Catalog 1986-87, Brown Type PD 5000 Perforation Washer, 1986-87. |
Brown Oil Tools, 1970-71 General Catalog, 3 pages, 1970-71. |
Brown Oil Tools, Inc., “Brown Hydraulic Set Packers” 2 pages, undated. |
Brown Oil Tools, Inc., Open Hole Packer—Long Lasting Dependability for Difficult Liner Cementing Jobs, 2 pages, undated. |
Brown Oil Tools, Open Hole Packers—Long Lasting Dependability for Difficult Cementing Jobs, 1 page, undated. |
C.D. Pope, et al., “Completion Techniques for Horizontal Wells in the Pearsall Austin Chalk,” SPE Production Engineering, pp. 144-148, May 1992 (SPE 20682). |
Canadian Sections SPE/Petroleum Society, 8th One-Day Conference on Horizontal Well Technology Schedule, Nov. 2001, 3 pages. |
Canadian Sections SPE/Petroleum Society, 8th One-Day Conference on Horizontal Well Technology, Abstract: Open Hole Stimulation and Testing Carbonate Reservoirs, Nov. 2001, 1 page. |
Canadian Sections SPE/Petroleum Society, 8th One-Day Conference on Horizontal Well Technology, Abstract: Successfule Open Hole Water Shut-Offs in Deep Hot Horizontal Wells, Nov. 2001, 1 page. |
Canadian Sections SPE/Petroleum Society, 8th One-Day Conference on Horizontal Well Technology, Online Library Catalog Listing, Nov. 2001, 2 pages. |
Canning, et al., “Innovative Pressure-Actuated Toe Sleeve Enables True Casing Pressure Integrity Test and Stage Fracturing While Improving Completion Economics in Unconventional Resources,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 167170, 2013; 7 pages. |
Carpenter, C., “Technology Applications,” Journal of Petroleum Technology, accessible at http://www.spe.org/jpt/article/8570-technology-applications-33/, undated; 13 pages. |
Chambers, M.R., et al, “Well Completion Design and Operations for a Deep Horizontal Well with Multiple Fractures”, 1995 (SPE 30417), pp. 499-505. |
Chauffe, S., “Hydraulic to Valve Specifically Designed for a Cemented Environment,” AADE-13-FTCE-25, American Association of Drilling Engineers, 2013; 5 pages. |
Composite Catalog of Oil Field Equipment and Services, Lynes Cement Collar, p. 18, 1980-81, 2 pages. |
Composite Catalog of Oil Field Equipment Services, Baker Sand Control, Open Hole Gravel Packing, p. 870, 1980-81, 2 pages. |
Conn, et al, “A Common Sense Approach to Intelligent Completions Through Improved Reliability and Lower Costs”, Technical Publication, PROMORE 002, Nov. 2001, 7 pages. |
Conn, T., “The Need for Intelligent Completions in Land-Based Well”, PROMORE Engineering Inc, 2001, 8 pages. |
Conn, Tim, “Get Smart, New Monitoring System Improves Understanding of Reservoirs”, New Technology Magazine, Jan./Feb. 2001. |
Coon, Robert et al., “Single-Trip Completion Concept Replaces Multiple Packers And Sliding Sleeves in Selection Multi-Zone Production and Stimulation Operations,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE-29539, pp. 911-915, dated 1995. |
Crawford, M., “Fracturing Gas-Bearing Strata,” Well Servicing Magazine, Nov.-Dec. 2009; 3 pages. |
D.L. Purvis et al., “Alternative Method for Stimulating Open Hole Horizontal Wellbores,” SPE-55614, pp. 1-13, dated 1999. |
D.W. Thomson et al., “Design and Installation of a Cost-Effective Completion System for Horizontal Chalk Wells Where Multiple Zones Require Acid Stimulation,” Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 8472, pp. 323-335, May 1997. |
D.W. Thomson et al., “Design and Installation of a Cost-Effective Completion System for Horizontal Chalk Wells Where Multiple Zones Require Acid Stimulation,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 37482, pp. 97-108, Mar. 1997. |
Damgaard, A.P. et al., “A Unique Method for Perforating, Fracturing, and Completing Horizontal Wells,” SPE Production Engineering, Feb. 1992, (SPE-19282), pp. 61-69. |
Daniel Savulescu, “Inflatable Casing Packers—Expanding the limits,” Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, vol. 36, No. 9, pp. 9-10, dated Oct. 1997. |
Defendants' Invalidity Contentions, Rapid Completions LLC v. Baker Hughes Incorporated, et al., v. Packers Plus Energy Services, Inc., et al., Case No. 6:15-cv-00724-RWS-KNM (E.D. Texas); 84 pages. |
Denney, D., “Technology Applications,” Journal of Petroleum Technology, accessible at http://www.spe.org/jpt/article/198-technology-applications-2012-04/, Apr. 2012; 10 pages. |
Denney, D., “Technology Applications,” Journal of Petroleum Technology, accessible at http://www.spe.org/jpt/m/article/450-technology-applications-august-2012, Aug. 2012; 4 pages. |
Donald S. Dreesen et al., “Developing Hot Dry Rock Reservoirs with Inflatable Open Hole Packers,” LA-UR-87-2083, 9 pages, dated 1987. |
Donald S. Dreesen et al., “Open Hole Packer for High Pressure Service in a Five Hundred Degree Fahrenheit Precambrian Wellbore,” LA-UR-85-42332, SPE-14745, 14 pages, dated 1985. |
Doug G. Durst et al. “Advanced Open Hole Multilaterals,” <https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-77199-MS?sort=&start=0&q=review+AND+%22packers%22+AND+%22open+hole%22&from—year=2001&peer—reviewed=&published—between=on&fromSearchResults=true&to—year=&rows=50#>, SPE-77199-MS, pp. 1-8, dated 2002. |
Dresser Oil Tools, Multilateral and Horizontal Completions—Zonemaster Reservoir Access Mandrels, “The Zonemaster Reservoir Access Mandrel offers a long term performance alternative to the use of sliding sleeves in Horizontal wells.” undated, 2 pages. |
Eberhard, M.J., et al., “Current Use of Limited-Entry Hydraulic Fracturing in the Codell/Niobrara Formations—DJ Basin,” SPE (Society for Petroleum Engineering) 29553, 1995, pp. 107-117. |
European Search Report, European Appl. No. 10836870.5, EPO, 11 pages, mailed Nov. 21, 2015. |
ExxonMobil, “Tight Gas: New Technologies, New Solutions,” ExxonMobil, May 2010; 2 pages. |
F.M. Verga et al., “Advanced Well Simulation in a Multilayered Reservoir,” <https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-68821-MS?sort=&start=250&q=review+horizontal+open+hole+%28uncased%29+completions+AND+%22multi%22&from—year=&peer—reviewed=&published—between=on&fromSearchResults=true&to—year=2001&rows=50#>, SPE-68821-MS, 10 pages, dated 2001. |
Federal Court of Calgary, Alberta Canada, Court File No. T-1202-13, Further Amended Statement of Defence and Counterclaim To Amended Statement of Claim, dated May 13, 2014, 24 pages. |
Federal Court of Calgary, Alberta Canada, Court File No. T-1569-15, Statement of Defence and Counterclaim, dated Feb. 24, 2016, 30 pages. |
Federal Court of Calgary, Alberta Canada, Court File No. T-1728-15, Statement of Defence and Counterclaim To Amended Statement of Claim, dated Feb. 1, 2016, 24 pages. |
Federal Court of Toronto, Ontario Canada, Court File No. T-1202-13, Fresh As Amended Counterclaim of TMK Completions Ltd. and Perelam, LLC., dated Jul. 13, 2015, 15 pages. |
Federal Court of Toronto, Ontario Canada, Court File No. T-1741-13, Statement of Defence and Counterclaim, dated Nov. 22, 2013, 11 pages. |
Fishing Services, Baker Oil Tools, 2001 Catalog. |
Fishing Services, Baker Oil Tools, undated catalog. |
Garfield, et al., “Novel Completion Technology Eliminates Formation Damage and Reduces Rig Time in Sand Control Applications,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 93518, 2005; 5 pages. |
George Everette King, “60 Years of Multi-Fractured Vertical, Deviated and Horizontal Wells: What Have We Learned?,” <https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-170952-MS?sort=&start=100&q=review+AND+%22packers%22+AND+%22open+hole%22&from—year=2014&peer—reviewed=&published—between=on&fromSearchResults=true&to—year=&rows=100#>, SPE-170952-MS, 32 pages, dated 2014. |
Guiberson AVA—Dresser Oil Tools, “Technical Section—Advanced Horizontal and Multilateral Completions”, Nov. 1997, 36 pages. |
Guiberson AVA & Dresser, “Hydraulic Set Packer: G-77 Packer,” p. 20, undated. |
Guiberson AVA, Dresser Oil Tools, “Tech Manual: Wizard II Hydraulic Set Retrievable Packer,”Apr. 1998, 42 pages. |
Halliburton Oilwell Cementing Company, Fracturing Services, 1956 catalog, 6 pages. |
Halliburton Oilwell Cementing Company, Improved Services for Increasing Production, 1956 catalog, 3 pages. |
Halliburton Services, 1970-71 Sales and Service Catalog, pp. 2335, 2338, 2340, and 2341, 6 pages. |
Halliburton Services, 1970-71 Sales and Service Catalog, pp. 2434-35, 3 pages. |
Halliburton, “Casing Sales Manual: Multiple-Stage Fracturing,” Jul. 2003, 10 pages. |
Halliburton, “Full-Opening (FO) Multiple-Stage Cementer,” p. 12, 2001, 2 pages. |
Halliburton, “Unlock the Trapped Potential of Your High Perm Reservoir,” <http://www.halliburton.com/products/prod—enhan/f-3335.htm> halliburton.com, dated Feb. 26, 2000. |
Halliburton, “Zonemaster Reservoir Access Mandrel System”, undated. |
Halliburton, Completion Products, p. 2-25, 1999 3 pages. |
Halliburton, Multiple-Stage Fracturing, pp. 9-1 and 9-2, 2013. |
Hansen, J. H. et al., “Controlled Acid Jet (CAJ) Technique for Effective Single Operation Stimulation of 14,000+ ft Long Reservoir Sections,” Society of Petroleum Engineers Inc., SPE 78318, Oct. 2002, 11 pages. |
Henderson, R., “Open Hole Completion Systems,” Presentation, Kentucky Oil & Gas Association, 2014; 33 pages. |
Henry Restarick, “Horizontal Completion Options in Reservoirs with Sand Problems,” SPE-29831, pp. 545-560, dated 1995. |
Hodges, Steven, et al, “Hydraulically-Actuated Intelligent Completions: Development and Applications”, (OTC-11933-MS) May 2000, 16 pages. |
Horizontal Completion Problems, Baker Hughes Solutions, 1996, 6 pages. |
I.B. Ishak et al., “Review of Horizontal Drilling”, <https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-29812-MS?sort=&start=0&q=review+horizontal+open+hole+%28uncased%29+completions+AND+%22multi%22&from—year=&peer—reviewed=&published—between=on&fromSearchResults=true&to—year=2001&rows=50#>, SPE-29812-MS, pp. 391-404, dated 1995. |
Ismail Gamal et al., “Ten Years Experience in Horizontal Application & Pushing The Limits Of Well Construction Approach In Upper Zakum Field (Offshore Abu Dhabi),” <https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-87284-MS?sort=&start=150&q=review+horizontal+open+hole+%28uncased%29+completions+AND+%22multi%22&from—year=&peer—reviewed=&published—between=on&fromSearchResults=true&to—year=2001&rows=50#>, SPE-87284-MS, 17 pages, dated 2000. |
J.C. Zimmerman et al., “Selection of Tools for Stimulation in Horizontal Cased Hole,” SPE-18995, 12 pages, dated 1989. |
J.E. Brown et al., “An Analysis of Hydraulically Fractured Horizontal Wells,” SPE-24322, dated 1992. |
Jesse J. Constantine, “Selective Production of Horizontal Openhole Completions Using ECP and Sliding Sleeve Technology,” SPE-55618, pp. 1-5, dated 1999. |
John B. Weirich et al., “Frac-Packing: Best Practices and Lessons Learned from over 600 Operations,” <https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-147419-MS?sort=&start=0&q=%22packers%22+AND+%22open+hole%22+AND+%22review%22+AND+%22advanced%22&from—year=2010&peer—reviewed=&published—between=on&fromSearchResults=true&to—year=&rows=100#>, SPE-147419-MS, 17 pages, dated 2012. |
John H. Healy et al., “Hydraulic Fracturing in Situ Stress Measurements to 2.1 KM Depth at Cajon Pass, California,” Geophysical Research Letters, vol. 15, No. 9, pp. 1005-1008, dated 1988. |
Johnny Bardsen et al. “Improved Zonal Isolation in Open Hole Applications,” <https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-169190-MS?sort=&start=0&q=review+AND+%22packers%22+AND+%22open+hole%22&from—year=2001&peer—reviewed=&published—between=on&fromSearchResults=true&to—year=&rows=50#>, SPE-169190-MS, 10 pages, dated 2014. |
Jul. 23, 2008 Declaration of Daniel J. Themig, U.S. Appl. No. 12/058,337, filed Aug. 1, 2008. |
Kamphuis, H., et al, “Multiple Fracture Stimulations In Horizontal Open-Hole Wells The Example of Well Boetersen Z9,” Germany, 1998 (SPE 50609), pp. 351-360. |
Kogsball, Hans-Henrik, et al., Ceramic screens control proppant flowback in fracture-stimulated offshore wells, Aug. 2011, pp. 43-50. |
Koloy, et al., “The Evolution, Optimization & Experience of Multistage Frac Completions in a North Sea Environment,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE-170641-MS, 2014; 15 pages. |
Koshtorev, pp. 14-15, 1987, 2 pages. |
Lagone, K.W. et al., SPE-530-PA—“A New Development in Completion Methods—The Limited Entry Technique,” Shell Oil Co., Jul. 1963, pp. 695-702. |
Larsen, Frank P., et al., “Using 4000 ft Long Induced Fractures to Water Flood the Dan Field,” Sep. 1997 (SPE 38558), pp. 583-593. |
Leonard John Kalfayan, “The Art and Practice of Acid Placement and Diversion: History, Present State, and Future,” <https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-124141-MS?sort=&start=0&q=%22horizontal+chalk+wells%22+AND+%22review%22+&from—year=&peer—reviewed=&published—between=&fromSearchResults=true&to—year=&rows=50#>, 124141-MS SPE Conference Paper, pp. 1-17, dated 2009. |
Lohoefer, et al., “New Barnett Shale Horizontal Completion Lowers Cost and Improves Efficiency,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 103046, 2006; 9 pages. |
Lynes ECPs and Cementing Tools, Baker catalog, pp. 89 and 87, dated 1988, 5 pages. |
M.C. Vincent, “Proving It—A Review of 80 Published Field Studies Demonstrating the Importance of Increased Fracture Conductivity”, <https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-77675-MS?sort=&start=0&q=horizontal+open+hole+uncased+completions+and+%22multistage%22&from—year=2001&peer—reviewed=&published—between=on&fromSearchResults=true&to—year=2005&rows=50#>, SPE-77675-MS, pp. 1-21, dated 2002. |
M.R. Norris et al., “Hydraulic Fracturing for Reservoir Management: Production Enhancement, Scale Control and Asphaltine Prevention,” <https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-71655-MS?sort=&start=350&q=review+horizontal+open+hole+%28uncased%29+completions+AND+%22multi%22&from—year=&peer—reviewed=&published—between=on&fromSearchResults=true&to—year=2001&rows=50#>, SPE-71655-MS, 12 pp., dated 2001. |
Maddox, et al., “Cementless Multi-Zone Horizontal Completion Yields Three-Fold Increase,” IADC/SPE Drilling Conference, IADC/SPE 112774, 2008; 7 pages. |
Martin P. Coronado et al., “Advanced Openhole Completions Utilizing a Simplified Zone Isolation System,” SPE 77438, pp. 1-11, Dated 2002. |
Martin P. Coronado et al., “Development of a One-trip ECP Cement Inflation and Stage Cementing System for Open Hole Completions,” IADC/SPE-39345, pp. 473-481, dated 1998. |
Martin, A.N., “Innovative Acid Fracturing Operations Used to Successfully Simulate Central North Sea Reservoir,” SPE 36620, pp. 479-486, dated 1996. |
Mascara, S., et al, “Acidizing Deep Open-Hole Horizontal Wells: A case History on Selective Stimulation and Coil Tubing Deployed Jetting System,” 1999 (SPE 54738) 11 pages. |
Mathur, et al., “Contrast Between Plug and Perf Method and Ball and Sleeve Method for Horizontal Well Stimulation,” Sep. 14, 2013; 12 pages. |
Mazerov, Katie, “Innovative Systems Enhance Ability to Achieve Selective Isolated Production in Horizontal Wells”, Drilling Contractor, May/Jun. 2008, pp. 124-129. |
McDaniel, B.W., et al, “Limited-Entry Frac Applications on Long Intervals of Highly Deviated or Horizontal Wells”, 1999, pp. 1-12 (SPE 56780). |
Mitchell, et al., “First Successful Application of Horizontal Open Hole Multistage Completion Systems in Turkey's Selmo Field,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE-17077-MS, 2014; 9 pages. |
Morali, Shirali C., An Innovative Single-Completion Design With Y-Block and ESP for Multiple Reservoirs, May 1990 (SPE-17663-PA) pp. 113-119. |
Neftyanoe, Hozyaistvo, p. 42, 1993, 1 pages. |
Neftyanoe, Hozyaistvo, pp. 40-41, 1993, 2 pages. |
Offshore Magazine “One Trip Completion Method,” dated Jul. 2001. |
Olivier Lietard et al., “Hydraulic Fracturing of Horizontal Wells: An Update of Design and Execution Guidelines,” <https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-37122-MS?sort=&start=0&q=review+horizontal+open+hole+%28uncased%29+completions+AND+%22multistage%22&from—year=&peer—reviewed=&published—between=on&fromSearchResults=true&to—year=2001&rows=50#>, SPE-37122-MS, pp. 723-737, dated 1996. |
Osisanya S. et al., “Design Criteria and Selection of Downhole Tools for Conducting Interference Tests in Horizontal Wells” SPE/CIM/CANMET International Conference On Recent Advances In Horizontal Well Applications, Mar. 20-23, 1994, Calgary, Canada, Paper No. HWC-94-58. |
Otis Pumpdown Equipment and Services, OTIS Pumpdown Flow Control Equipment, Production Maintenance Utilizing Pumpdown Tools, OTIS Pumpdown Completion Equipment, 1974-75 Catalog. |
P. D. Ellis et al., “Application of Hydraulic Fractures in Openhole Horizontal Wells,” SPE-65464, 10 pages, dated 2000. |
Packer Plus, New Technology RockSeal Open Hole Packer Series, not dated, 1 page. |
Packers Plus—New Technology, “RockSeal Open Hole Packers Series”, Dec. 21, 2005. |
Packers Plus Energy Services Homepage, “Welcome to Packers Plus,” <http://packersplus.com/index.htm>, dated Feb. 23, 2000. |
Packers Plus Press Release, “Ken Paltzat Canadian Operations Manager for Packers Plus,” Dated Feb. 1, 2000. |
Paolo Gavioli et al., “The Evolution of the Role of Openhole Packers in Advanced Horizontal Completions: From Optional Accessory to Critical Key of Success,” <https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-132846-MS?sort=&start=0&q=%22packers%22+AND+%22open+hole%22+AND+%22review %22+AND+%22advanced%22&from—year=2010&peer—reviewed=&published—between=on&fromSearchResults=true&to—year=&rows=100#>, SPE-132846-PA, pp. 1-27, dated 2010. |
PetroQuip Energy Services, BigFoot PetroQuip Case Study, Dec. 22, 2015; 1 page. |
PetroQuip Energy Services, BigFoot Production Description, accessible at http://www.petroquip.com/index.php/2012-10-22-19-46-41/land-completions/big-foot, undated; 2 pages. |
PetroQuip Energy Services, BigFoot Toe Sleeve PetroQuip Case Study, Nov. 2014; 2 pages. |
Petro-Tech Tools, Inc., Dump Circulating Sub, Jul. 2, 1996, 3 pages. |
Polar Completions Engineering Inc. Technical Manual, Jul. 5, 2001, Rev. 2, 13 pages. |
Polar Completions Engineering, Bearfoot Packer 652-0000, 5 pages, Jul. 5, 2001. |
R. Seale et al. “An Effective Horizontal Well Completion and Stimulation System, ”Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, vol. 46, No. 12, pp. 73-77, dated Dec. 2007. |
R.J. Tailby et al., “A New Technique for Servicing Horizontal Wells,” SPE-22823, pp. 43-58, Dated 1991. |
Ricky Plauche and W. E. (Skip) Koshak, “Advances in Sliding Sleeve Technology and Coiled Tubing Performance Enhance Multizone Completion of Abnormally Pressured Gulf of Mexico Horizontal Well,” ICoTA, Apr. 1997 (SPE 38403). |
Rockey Seale et al., “Effective Simulation of Horizontal Wells—A New Completion Method,” SPE-106357, 5 pages, dated 2006. |
Ross, Elsie, “New Monitoring System Improves Understanding of Reservoirs”, New Tech Magazine, Jan. 2001. |
Rune Freyer, “Swelling Packer for Zonal Isolation in Open Hole Screen Completions,” SPE-78312, pp. 1-5, dated 2002. |
Ryan Henderson, “Open Hole Completion Systems,” Tennessee Oil and Gas Association, dated 2014. |
S. Mascarà, et al., “Acidizing Deep Open-Hole Horizontal Wells: A case History on Selective Stimulation and Coil Tubing Deployed Jetting System,” SPE-54738, pp. 1-11, dated 1999. |
Seale, Rocky, “Open-Hole completions System Enables Multi-Stage Fracturing and Stimulation Along Horizontal Wellbores”, Drilling Contractor, Jul./Aug. 2007, pp. 112-114. |
Suresh Jacob et al. “Advanced Well Completion Designs to Meet Unique Reservoir and Production Requirements,” <https://www.onepetro.org/conference-paper/SPE-172215-MS?sort=&start=0&q=review+AND+%22packers%22+AND+%22open+hole%22&from—year=2014&peer—reviewed=&published—between=on&fromSearchResults=true&to—year=&rows=100#>, SPE-172215-MS, pp. 1-13, dated 2014. |
T.P. Frick “State-Of-The-Art In The Matrix Stimulation Of Horizontal Wells,” <https://www.onepetro.org/journal-paper/SPE-26997-PA?sort=&start=0&q=horizontal+open+hole+uncased+completions+AND+%22multistage%22&from—year=&peer—reviewed=&published—between=on&fromSearchResults=true&to—year=2001&rows=50#>, SPE-26997-PA, pp. 94-102, dated May 1996. |
TAM Inflatable Zone Insolation Systems, TAM catalog, p. 5, dated 1994, 1 page. |
Tam International, “Inflatable Bridge Plugs and Cement Retainers,” <http://tamintl.com/pages/plugg.htm>, Dated Oct. 22, 2000. |
TAM Int'l Inc., TAM Casing Annulus Packers and Accessories, pp. 14-15, 1994, 4 pages. |
TAM Int'l Inc., TAM Casing Annulus Packers and Accessories, pp. 4-5, 1994, 4 pages. |
Team Oil Tools, “Multi-Stage Fracturing—Orio Toe Valve,”TEAM Oil Tools, accessible at http://www.teamoiltools.com/ProductServices/Multistage-Fracturing-ORIO-Toe-Valve/, undated; 1 page. |
Thomas Finkbeiner, “Reservoir Optimized Fracturing—Higher Productivity From Low—Permeability Reservoirs Through Customized Multistage Fracturing,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE-141371, pp. 1-16, dated 2011. |
Top Tool Company, Hydraulic Perforation Wash Tool, 4 pages, undated. |
Van Domelen, M.S., “Enhanced Profitability with Non-Conventional IOR Technology,” Oct. 1998 (SPE 49523), pp. 599-609. |
Van Dyke, Kate, “Fundamentals of Petroleum Engineering,” Petroleum Extension Service, 4th ed., 1997. |
White, Cameron, “Formation Characteristics dictate Completion Design”, Oil & Gas Journal, pp. 31-36, 1991. |
Wong, F.Y. et al., “Developing a Field Strategy to Eliminate Crossflow Along A Horizontal Well,” SPE/CIM/CANMET International Conference On Recent Advances in Horizontal Well Applications, Mar. 20-23, 1994, Calgary, Canada, Paper No. HWC-94-24. |
Yakovenko, et al, “Tests Results of the New Device for Open Bottom Hole Wells Cementing Operations,” May 2001, 3 pages. |
Yuan, et al., “Improved Efficiency of Multi-Stage Fracturing Operations: An Innovative Pressure Activated Toe Sleeve,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE-172971-MS, 2015; 6 pages. |
Yuan, et al., “Unlimited Multistage Frac Completion System: A Revolutionary Ball-Activated System with Single Size Balls,” Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 166303, 2013; 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140238682 A1 | Aug 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60331491 | Nov 2001 | US | |
60404783 | Aug 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10299004 | Nov 2002 | US |
Child | 11104467 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13612533 | Sep 2012 | US |
Child | 14267123 | US | |
Parent | 12966849 | Dec 2010 | US |
Child | 13612533 | US | |
Parent | 12471174 | May 2009 | US |
Child | 12966849 | US | |
Parent | 11550863 | Oct 2006 | US |
Child | 12471174 | US | |
Parent | 11104467 | Apr 2005 | US |
Child | 11550863 | US |