The present invention relates to a method and apparatus of the general type disclosed in EP 0 235 557 and corresponding U.S. Pat. No. 4,913,363, for winding a continuously advancing yarn into a yarn package.
When winding a yarn to a package, the yarn is deposited on the package surface within the width thereof at a substantially constant circumferential speed of the yarn package and at a varying crossing angle. To this end, a traversing yarn guide reciprocates the yarn within a traverse stroke, before the yarn contacts the package surface. To obtain an even mass distribution of the yarn and, thus, a uniform density of the package, in particular in the edge regions thereof, it is known to shorten and lengthen the traverse stroke cyclically during the winding operation. These length variations of the traverse strokes are referred to as a so-called stroke modification. The stroke modification prevents a high edge buildup (saddle formation) of the packages.
In the method disclosed in the above-referenced patent documents, the length of the traverse stroke is varied in accordance with a predetermined stroke modification function. This stroke modification function is defined by the time period, which is needed for reaching again the length of the traverse stroke, which was adjusted before the stroke modification. Thus, the stroke modification function is formed by a plurality of modified strokes, which define a reciprocal movement of the traversing yarn guide at a varied length of the traverse stroke. When traveling through a stroke modification function, the yarn is therefore deposited in many modified strokes on the package surface. The stroke modification function serves to define the distribution of the reversal points of the traversing yarn guide or the yarn on the package surface at the package ends. Thus, the mass distribution of the yarn is directly influenced by predetermining the stroke modification function.
Since in the known method the stroke modification function is based solely on empirical values, there exists the problem that a variation of the mass distribution on the wound yarn package surface is to be changed likewise only on the basis of empirical values.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,771,960 discloses a further method, wherein the stroke modification function effects random length variations of the traverse stroke. To this end, a length is subdivided into a plurality of points between the outermost reversal point and the innermost reversal point, which are each defined by the longest traverse stroke and the shortest traverse stroke. Each of the points represents a reversal point of the traversing yarn guide. In this process, the sequence and the frequency of approaching the individual reversal points are determined by a certain algorithm, which is based on the random principle. Thus, this known method is likewise totally unsuited for producing a predetermined mass distribution of the yarn on the yarn package.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,544,113 and 4,767,071 disclose a further method of winding a yarn package, wherein for purposes of varying the length of the traverse stroke, the stroke modification function predetermines an always recurrent, uniform change between a maximum and a minimum traverse stroke. With that, it is possible to produce only a very irregular mass distribution in the end region of the yarn package, which exhibits relatively soft end regions in comparison with the center region.
In the known methods, the length variation of the traverse stroke prevents the buildup of high package edges at the ends of the yarn package. However, the influence on the package density by distributing reversal points in the end regions of the yarn package, as defined by the stroke modification function, is purely random.
It is therefore the object of the invention to further develop a method of the initially described kind for winding a yarn package, as well as an apparatus for carrying out the method in such a manner that after winding the yarn, the yarn package exhibits over the entire package width a uniform package density or a predetermined profile of the package density.
It is known that the density of the yarn package substantially depends on the mass distribution of the yarn on the package. However, the yarn mass deposited per unit time within a traverse stroke on the circumference of the package is not constant, since at the end of the traverse stroke, the traversing yarn guide is decelerated from a traversing speed, and must again be accelerated to the traversing speed after the reversal. Thus, in the region in which the traversing speed is constant, the yarn mass deposited on the circumference of the yarn package will likewise be constant. Outside this linear range, the yarn mass deposited on the circumference of the yarn package continuously changes up to a maximum in the region of the reversal point.
The method of the present invention establishes a relationship between the stroke modification function and the mass distribution. In this connection, a mass distribution of the yarn is predetermined on a hypothetically wound, ideal yarn package. From the hypothetically wound, ideal yarn package with a predetermined mass distribution of the yarn, the stroke modification function is determined from the distribution of the reversal points on the hypothetically wound, ideal yarn package. This stroke modification function is used to produce the yarn package being wound. The special advantage of the invention lies in that it is possible to wind the end regions of the yarn package with a defined mass distribution of the yarn.
To obtain as small deviations as possible between the predetermined mass distribution of the yarn on the hypothetically wound, ideal yarn package and the wound mass distribution of the yarn on the wound yarn package, it is proposed to use a microprocessor for computing from predetermined winding parameters the mass distribution of the yarn on the hypothetically wound, ideal yarn package. In this instance, one predetermines as winding parameters, for example the yarn speed, the traversing speed, the crossing angle, the yarn denier, and the length of the reversal range. The hypothetically wound, ideal package is ideally wound by computation, wherein the computed mass distribution does not exceed a predetermined desired value. From the computed mass distribution of the yarn on the hypothetically wound, ideal yarn package, the computed distribution of the reversal points of the traversing yarn guide is converted to the stroke modification function. This variant of the method makes it possible to realize a predetermined mass distribution in the case of the wound yarn package without a major deviation.
In a preferred embodiment, the computation of the mass distribution of the yarn on the hypothetically wound, ideal package, is performed in the following steps. First, the yarn mass that is deposited during a traverse stroke is computed from the predetermined winding parameters. Since the yarn mass is proportional to the traversing speed, it is possible to allocate a certain yarn mass to each segment of the traverse stroke. This allocation is related to the package width B. To this end, the traverse stroke is subdivided along the package width into a plurality of mass segments of a constant width. Each mass segment contains the yarn mass deposited in the mass segment. This deposited yarn mass is defined as partial yarn mass. Then, one predetermines a desired value of the mass distribution of the yarn on the hypothetically wound, ideal yarn package that is to be computed, as well as a certain number of traverse strokes. For example, it would be possible to predetermine as desired value of the mass distribution the fact that a constant mass distribution (Fdesired=100%) is present over the entire package width.
The number of traverse strokes is optional, with a higher number leading to a smaller deviation between the computed, hypothetically wound ideal yarn package and the later wound yarn package. Taking into account the number of traverse strokes as well as the desired value of the mass distribution, the previously defined mass segments with the respective partial yarn masses are added up to the mass distribution. The computed mass distribution, which equals the predetermined desired value of the mass distribution, contains a distribution of the mass segments, which serve as a measure for the stroke modification function. In this instance, the absolute number of the mass segments is defined by the number of traverse strokes, since each traverse stroke is formed from a plurality of mass segments.
The stroke modification function, which forms the distribution of the reversal points during the winding cycle, can then be derived from the computed mass distribution by the following steps. From the distribution of the mass segments within the computed mass distribution of the yarn on the hypothetically wound, ideal yarn package, one determines the length variations of the traverse strokes. Since each reversal point or each traverse stroke starts with a mass segment S1, it is possible to derive the length variations of the traverse strokes solely by the distribution of the mass segments S1 relative to the package width. To convert the length variations of the traverse strokes to the stroke modification function, it will be advantageous to include an algorithm of deposit, so that, for example, a certain change is maintained between the variations of the individual traverse strokes.
Since in the range of the traverse stroke, in which the traversing yarn guide operates at a constant traverse speed, the mass distribution is substantially constant, it is further proposed to form the partial yarn mass of one of the mass segments by the ratio of the absolute yarn mass of the mass segment to the absolute yarn mass of a mass segment extending in the center range of the package width. With that, it is possible to compute the mass distribution only for the end regions of the package.
To change the mass distribution of the wound yarn package, the mass distribution of the yarn is predetermined for the hypothetical ideal wound yarn package. The actual value of the mass distribution is then determined by means of a hardness testing device, or manually by a thumb test. A comparison between the predetermined mass distribution and the wound mass distribution makes it possible to find out, whether the wound yarn package has the desired density profile. In the case that deviations exist in certain ranges along the package width, a corrected mass distribution is determined and taken as a basis for the computation of the hypothetically wound, ideal yarn package. From the computation, the stroke modification function is then redefined, so that the newly wound yarn package shows a purposefully changed mass distribution. This variant of the method is especially advantageous for producing certain profiles of the package density in the wound yarn package. It will be advantageous to use this variant of the method in particular at the beginning of a process. In this instance, one could first wind a sample package for purposes of obtaining rapidly an optimized package density from the comparison of actual and desired values. The sample package could have, for example, only a minimum number of yarn layers, so that an optimization is possible after a relatively short winding time.
In a particularly advantageous variant of the method, a controller performs the determination of the stroke modification function and thus the distribution of the reversal points, as well as the control of the traversing yarn guide. The controller is connected to a drive of the traversing yarn guide. This drive influences the traversing motion and the traverse stroke of the traversing yarn guide. Since both the traversing speed and the length of the traverse stroke are determined by the drive of the traversing yarn guide, it is possible to realize the stroke modification function with a high precision. In so doing, the drive of the traversing yarn guide is controlled directly as a function of the stroke modification function in such a manner that the respective length variations of the traversing strokes are carried out.
The method of the present invention is independent of the kind of winding. The kinds of winding include random winding, precision winding, or stepped precision winding. While in the case of random winding, the mean value of the traversing speed remains substantially constant during the winding cycle, the wind ratio (spindle speed to traversing speed) changes constantly during the winding cycle. In the case of precision winding, the wind ratio is kept constant. In the case of a stepped precision winding, however, the wind ratio is changed in steps according to a predetermined program.
Likewise, it is especially advantageous to combine the method of the present invention with the known ribbon breaking method. This permits producing cross-wound packages with a large diameter and a great package density, which ensure a troublefree overhead unwinding of the yarn at high withdrawal speeds of above 1,000 m/min and higher.
The method of the invention may be used both in the case of cylindrical yarn packages with substantially rectangular end faces and for producing biconical yarn packages with oblique end faces.
The apparatus of the present invention for carrying out the method distinguishes itself by a high flexibility in the production of yarn packages. With this apparatus, it is easy to vary the stroke modification functions individually as a function of the predetermined mass distributions. When predetermining the traverse stroke and traversing speed, the controller proceeds each time from an instantaneously predetermined stroke modification function. To this end, the controller comprises a data store for receiving winding parameters and a microprocessor for computing a mass distribution of the yarn on a hypothetically wound, ideal yarn package, and for determining a stroke modification function for varying the length of the traverse strokes.
The flexibility of the apparatus is further increased by the particularly advantageous further development of the invention wherein the traversing yarn guide is driven by means of an electric motor, for example, a stepping motor, or by means of an electric synchro generator. With that, it is possible to couple the traversing speed with the respective length variation of the traverse stroke. A shortening of the traverse stroke can thus occur at a constant traversing speed or with constantly deposited yarn masses per unit time.
The coupling between the traversing yarn guide and the electric motor is preferably designed and constructed as a belt drive. To this end, the electric motor comprises a drive pulley, which drives a belt that extends over at least one belt pulley. The belt mounts the traversing yarn guide, and reciprocates it within the package width.
In the following, the method of the present invention, as well as the apparatus for carrying out the method of the present invention are described in greater detail with reference to an embodiment illustrated in the attached drawings, in which:
In the present embodiment, the sensor 17 is designed and constructed as a pulse transmitter, which senses a catching groove 19 in centering plate 8. The catching groove 19 forms part of a catching device 18, which engages the yarn 1 at the beginning of the winding cycle, and enables winding the initial layers of the yarn on tube 7. The pulse transmitter 17 supplies per rotation a signal as a function of the always returning catching groove 19. These pulses are converted in controller 4 for evaluating the rotational speed of tube 7.
In the situation shown in
The controller 4 predetermines both the traversing speed of traversing yarn guide 3 and the length of the traverse stroke, which leads to a corresponding control of electric motor 12. For the control, the controller 4 receives a winding parameter E. As winding parameters E, it is possible to predetermine the winding speed, the diameter of the drive, the traversing speed, the variation of the traversing speed within a traverse stroke, and the denier of the yarn being wound. The winding parameters E are deposited in a data store 24 inside controller 4. To determine a stroke modification function Z, the controller 4 comprises a microprocessor 25. Inside the microprocessor 25, a mass distribution F of the yarn on a hypothetically wound, ideal yarn package is computed both from a predetermined mass distribution Fdesired of the yarn on a hypothetically wound, ideal yarn package, and from a predetermined number of traverse strokes H. From the computation of the mass distribution F, a stroke modification function Z is derived, which causes the length variations of the traverse stroke upon activation of electric motor 12.
To realize an as exact positioning of traversing yarn guide 3 as possible by traverse drive 2, the electric motor 12 connects to controller 4 via a signal line, which is used to supply at a time to controller 4 one angular position of the rotor shaft of electric motor 12. This actual position of the electric motor is included in the control of a desired position of the electric motor, so that both an adjustment and a very precise control of the electric motor are always ensured.
To obtain a predetermined mass distribution of the deposited yarn masses, in particular in the end regions of the yarn package, the traverse stroke is varied in its length according to a predetermined stroke modification function Z.
During the winding cycle, a so-called stroke modification is performed by shortening or lengthening the traverse stroke. To begin with, the traverse stroke Hmax is decreased in accordance with a predetermined stroke modification function to a minimum traverse stroke, and subsequently lengthened to the original value Hmax of the traverse stroke.
During each traverse stroke, a yarn length is deposited on the circumference of yarn package 6.
Advantageously, the mass distribution F is computed with standardized and thus dimensionless yarn masses. To this end, a partial yarn mass m of a mass segment is formed by the ratio of the absolute yarn mass M of the aforesaid mass segment to the absolute yarn mass Mi of a mass segment Si lying in a center range of the package width, wherein the traversing speed is constant. The partial yarn mass in the linear range of the package width is thus m=constant=1. In the reversal regions, the partial yarn mass of the mass segments will assume the values m>1.
Since each of the traverse strokes that is taken as a basis in the computation of the mass distribution F, starts with the mass segment S1, it is possible to determine the length variations A of the traverse strokes, for example, in such a manner that the package width B is subdivided into a plurality of small package segments of a constant width. Starting from one end face of the yarn package, the number of mass segments S1 contained in each package segment is determined. This results in a distribution of the mass segments S1 between the maximum traverse stroke Hmax and a minimum traverse stroke Hmin. The number of the mass segments S1 equals the number of length variations A of the traverse strokes. Thus, it is possible to determine from the distribution of the mass segments S1 directly the stroke modification function Z, while taking into account an algorithm of deposit.
Once the stroke modification function Z is determined, the cycle for winding the yarn starts.
After the yarn package is fully wound, the package density or mass distribution is checked. The wound mass distribution Factual may be determined, for example, manually by a measuring means. The determined mass distribution Factual of the wound yarn package can then be input to the microprocessor. Within the microprocessor, a comparison occurs between the actual mass distribution Factual and the desired value of the mass distribution Fdesired.
With that, the method of the present invention represents a possibility of purposefully influencing the distribution of the yarn mass on the yarn package.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
100 01 085 | Jan 2000 | DE | national |
This is a continuation of PCT/EP01/00104, filed Jan. 8, 2001, and designating the U.S.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4325517 | Schippers et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4498637 | Yamamoto et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
4544113 | Yoshinaga et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4659027 | Schippers et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4767071 | Hirai | Aug 1988 | A |
4771960 | Yamamoto et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4913363 | Lenz | Apr 1990 | A |
5112001 | Yamamoto et al. | May 1992 | A |
5275343 | Yamamoto et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5954289 | Hermanns et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6065712 | Mayer et al. | May 2000 | A |
6186435 | Mayer et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6283401 | Lieber et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6308907 | Bartkowiak | Oct 2001 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3825413 | Feb 1990 | DE |
4310905 | Oct 1994 | DE |
19625511 | Jan 1998 | DE |
0235557 | Sep 1987 | EP |
WO 9948786 | Sep 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20020033428 A1 | Mar 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/EP01/00104 | Jan 2001 | US |
Child | 09952349 | US |