1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to digital image correction, and particularly to correction of eye artifacts due to flash exposure.
2. Description of the Related Art
U.S. Pat. No. 6,873,743 to Steinberg, which is hereby incorporated by reference, discloses an automatic, red-eye detection and correction system for digital images including a red-eye detector module that determines without user intervention if a red-eye defect exists. If a defect is located in an image the portion of the image surrounding the defect is passed to a correction module that de-saturates the red components of the defect while preserving the other color characteristics of the defect region.
WO03/071484, Pixology, discloses a method of detecting red-eye features in a digital image comprising identifying highlight i.e. glint regions of the image having pixels with a substantially red hue and higher saturation and lightness values than pixels in the regions therearound. In addition, pupil regions comprising two saturation peaks either side of a saturation trough may be identified. It is then determined whether each highlight or pupil region corresponds to part of a red-eye feature on the basis of further selection criteria, which may include determining whether there is an isolated, substantially circular area of correctable pixels around a reference pixel. Correction of red-eye features involves reducing the lightness and/or saturation of some or all of the pixels in the red-eye feature.
In many cases, the eye-artifact that is caused by the use of flash is more complex than a mere combination of red color and a highlight glint. Such artifacts can take the form of a complex pattern of hybrid portions that are red and other portions that are yellow, golden, white or a combination thereof. One example includes the case when the subject does not look directly at the camera when a flash photograph is taken. Light from the flash hits the eye-ball at an angle which may provoke reflections different than retro-reflection, that are white or golden color. Other cases include subjects that may be wearing contact lenses or subjects wearing eye glasses that diffract some portions of the light differently than others. In addition, the location of the flash relative to the lens, e.g. under the lens, may exacerbate a split discoloration of the eyes.
A technique is provided for digital image artifact correction as follows. A digital image is acquired. A candidate red-eye defect region is identified in the image. A region of high intensity pixels is identified which has at least a threshold intensity value in a vicinity of said candidate red-eye region. An eye-related characteristic of a combined hybrid region is analyzed. The combined hybrid region includes the candidate red-eye region and the region of high intensity pixels. The combined hybrid region is identified as a flash artifact region based on the analyzing of the eye-related characteristic. Flash artifact correction is applied to the flash artifact region.
The flash artifact correction may include red-eye correction of the candidate red-eye region. The flash artifact correction may also include correction of the region of high intensity pixels.
A bounding box may be defined around the candidate red-eye defect region. The identifying of the region of high intensity pixels may comprise identifying a seed high intensity pixel by locating said seed high intensity pixel within said bounding box. The seed pixel may have a yellowness above a pre-determined threshold and a redness below a pre-determined threshold. The region of high intensity pixels may be defined around the seed pixel.
The analyzing may include calculating a difference in roundness between the candidate red-eye region and the combined region. The red-eye correction may be applied when the roundness of the combined hybrid region is greater than a threshold value.
The method may include determining to apply red-eye correction when a roundness of the combined hybrid region is greater than a roundness of the candidate red-eye region by a threshold amount.
The method may include determining to not apply correction when the region of high intensity pixels includes greater than a threshold area. The area may be determined as a relative function to the size of said bounding box.
The method may include determining a yellowness and a non-pinkness of the region of high intensity pixels. The acquired image may be in LAB color space, and the method may include measuring an average b value of the region of high intensity pixels and determining a difference between an average a value and the average b value of the region of high intensity pixels.
The analyzing may include analyzing the combined hybrid region for the presence of a glint, and responsive to detecting a glint, determining to not correct the region of high intensity pixels responsive to the presence of glint.
The method may include correcting the region of high intensity pixels by selecting one or more pixel values from a corrected red-eye region and employing the pixel values to correct the region of high intensity pixels. The selected pixel values may be taken from pixels having L and b values falling within a median for the corrected red-eye region.
The method may include determining to not apply correction when an average b value of the region of high intensity pixels exceeds a relatively low threshold or if a difference between average a and b values is lower than a pre-determined threshold.
The method may include converting the acquired image to one of RGB, YCC or Lab color space formats, or combinations thereof.
The analyzing of the acquired image may be performed in Luminance chrominance color space and the region of high intensity pixels may have a luminance value greater than a luminance threshold, and blue-yellow chrominance values greater than a chrominance threshold and a red-green value less than a red-green threshold.
The method may include filtering the red-eye candidate regions to confirm or reject said regions as red-eye defect regions, and selecting a subset of the rejected red-eye candidate regions.
The method may be implemented within a digital image acquisition device. The method may be implemented as part of an image acquisition process. The method may be implemented as part of a playback option in the digital image acquisition device.
The method may be implemented to run as a background process in a digital image acquisition device. The method may be implemented within a general purpose computing device and wherein the acquiring may include receiving the digital image from a digital image acquisition device.
The candidate red-eye region and/or the region of high intensity pixels may be corrected. The region of high intensity pixels may be corrected after the red-eye candidate region. The correcting of the region of high intensity pixels may utilize corrected pixel values based on the candidate red-eye region. Results of correcting the candidate red-eye region and the region of high intensity pixels may be combined in such a manner as to obfuscate a seam between the regions. The method may include smoothing a seam region between the candidate red-eye region and the region of high intensity pixels.
The eye-related characteristic may include shape, roundness, and/or relative pupil size.
A further method is provided for digital image artifact correction. A digital image is acquired. A candidate red-eye defect region is identified in the image. A seed pixel is identified which has a high intensity value in the vicinity of the candidate red-eye region. An eye-related characteristic of a combined hybrid region is analyzed. The combined hybrid region includes the candidate red-eye region and the seed pixel. The combined hybrid region is identified as a flash artifact region based on the analyzing of the eye-related characteristic. Flash artifact correction is applied to the flash artifact region.
The flash artifact correction may include red-eye correction of the candidate red-eye region. The flash artifact correction may also include correction of a second region that includes the seed pixel.
The seed pixel may have a yellowness above a pre-determined threshold and a redness below a pre-determined threshold.
The method may include filtering the red-eye candidate regions to confirm or reject the regions as red-eye defect regions, and selecting a subset of the rejected red-eye candidate regions.
The method may be implemented within a digital image acquisition device. The method may be implemented as part of an image acquisition process. The method may be implemented as part of a playback option in the digital image acquisition device.
The method may be implemented to run as a background process in a digital image acquisition device. The method may be implemented within a general purpose computing device, and the acquiring may include receiving the digital image from a digital image acquisition device. The analyzing may include checking whether an average b value exceeds a relatively low threshold. The analyzing may include checking whether a difference between an average a value and the average b value is lower than a given threshold.
Embodiments of the invention will now be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
The preferred embodiments provide improved methods for detecting defects in subjects' eyes as well as methods for correcting such defects.
A preferred embodiment may operate by examining a candidate red eye region, looking in its neighborhood or vicinity for a possible yellow, white and/or golden patch belonging to the same eye, and, if any, under certain conditions correcting one or both of the red-eye or golden patch.
Using a technique in accordance with a preferred embodiment, the quality and acceptability of automatic eye correction can be increased for half red-half white/golden defects.
Implementations of the preferred embodiments can take advantage of the red part of the eye defect being detected by one automatic red-eye detection processing method, perhaps utilizing a conventional technique or a new technique, so the detection of the non-red regions can be applied as a pre-correction stage, and so that this method may take full advantage of existing or new detection methods. The correction parts of such red-eye processing may be altered to implement a technique in accordance with a preferred embodiment, while non correction parts preferably are not altered.
A technique in accordance with a preferred embodiment may provide a qualitative improvement in image correction with relatively little processing overhead making it readily implemented in cameras that may have limited processing capability and/or without unduly effecting the camera click-to-click interval.
It will be seen that pixels belonging to a red-eye defect may be corrected by reducing the red value of the pixel. As an example, image information may be available in Luminance-Chrominance space such as L*a*b* color space. This may involve reducing the L* and a* value of a pixel to a suitable level. In manu cases, reduction of the a* value may automatically restore the chrominance of the eye thus restoring a true value of the iris.
However, for white/golden pixels of a half red-half white/golden eye defect, the L and possibly b characteristics of the pixel may also be either saturated and/or distorted. This means that unlike red eye defects, in these cases the original image information may be partially or even totally lost. The correction may be performed by reducing the overall L* value as well as reduction of the a* and b*. However, because l* may be very high, the chrominance may be very low, thus there may not be significant color information remaining In an additional preferred embodiment, correction of the white/golden portion of the defect involves reconstructing the eye, as opposed to the restoration described above from information from the corrected red eye portion of the defect.
Referring now to
Next, during red-eye detection 32, red-pixels 20 are identified and subsequently grouped into regions 22 comprising a plurality of contiguous (or generally contiguous) pixels (see, e.g.,
One possible reason a filtering process might reject a candidate region, such as a region of red-pixels 20 as illustrated at
Processing in accordance with an exemplary embodiment which may be involved in checking for half red-half white/golden eye defects is outlined in more detail as follows:
The present invention is not limited to the embodiments described above herein, which may be amended or modified without departing from the scope of the present invention as set forth in the appended claims, and structural and functional equivalents thereof.
In methods that may be performed according to preferred embodiments herein and that may have been described above and/or claimed below, the operations have been described in selected typographical sequences. However, the sequences have been selected and so ordered for typographical convenience and are not intended to imply any particular order for performing the operations.
In addition, all references cited above herein, in addition to the background and summary of the invention sections, are hereby incorporated by reference into the detailed description of the preferred embodiments as disclosing alternative embodiments and components.
This application is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/960,487, filed Dec. 4, 2010, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,126,265; which is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/558,859, filed on Sep. 14, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,865,036; which is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/282,955, filed on Nov. 18, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,599,577, entitled, “Method and Apparatus of Correcting Hybrid Flash Artifacts in Digital Images.”
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5231674 | Cleveland et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5649238 | Wakabayashi et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5678073 | Stephenson, III et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5708866 | Leonard | Jan 1998 | A |
6125213 | Morimoto | Sep 2000 | A |
6407777 | DeLuca | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6809840 | Yu et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6816619 | Tlaskal et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6873743 | Steinberg | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6980691 | Nesterov et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7027643 | Comaniciu et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7042505 | DeLuca | May 2006 | B1 |
7130453 | Kondo et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7403654 | Wu et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7474341 | DeLuca et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7567707 | Willamowski et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7574069 | Setlur et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7593603 | Wilensky | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7613332 | Enomoto et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7619665 | DeLuca et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7630006 | DeLuca et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7657060 | Cohen et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7702149 | Ohkubo et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7747071 | Yen et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7847839 | DeLuca et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7847840 | DeLuca et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7903870 | Budagavi | Mar 2011 | B1 |
7912245 | Steinberg et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7925060 | Norita et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7973853 | Ojima et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8130309 | Wada | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8160308 | Corcoran et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8169507 | Odaka | May 2012 | B2 |
20010028981 | Okada et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020089514 | Kitahara et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020150292 | O'Callaghan | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030039402 | Robins et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030053664 | Pavlidis et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030071908 | Sannoh et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030086134 | Enomoto | May 2003 | A1 |
20030086164 | Abe | May 2003 | A1 |
20030161506 | Velazquez et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040041924 | White et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040109614 | Enomoto et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20060072815 | Wu et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060204052 | Yokouchi | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060280361 | Umeda | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060280375 | Dalton et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070098260 | Yen et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070150106 | Hashimoto et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070195191 | Ide et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070263928 | Akahori | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080112599 | Capata et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080219518 | Steinberg et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090022421 | Uyttendaele et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090041309 | Kim et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20100034432 | Ono et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100053367 | Nanu et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100053368 | Nanu et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20110102643 | Nanu et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110222730 | Steinberg et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 199 672 | Apr 2002 | EP |
1 528 509 | May 2005 | EP |
2 227 002 | Sep 2008 | EP |
2227002 | Sep 2010 | EP |
2 165 523 | Apr 2011 | EP |
2165523 | Apr 2011 | EP |
2379819 | Sep 2001 | GB |
3205989 | Sep 1991 | JP |
7281285 | Oct 1995 | JP |
10233929 | Sep 1998 | JP |
11175699 | Jul 1999 | JP |
411284874 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2000125320 | Apr 2000 | JP |
2003179807 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2006285956 | Oct 2006 | JP |
WO 03019473 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03071484 | Aug 2003 | WO |
2005015896 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005015896 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005076217 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO 2005076217 | Oct 2005 | WO |
WO 2005076217 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO 2007057063 | May 2007 | WO |
WO 2008109708 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO 2010017953 | Feb 2010 | WO |
WO 2010025908 | Mar 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Vachier et al., Valuation of image extrema using alternating filters by reconstruction, Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, vol. 2568, 1995, pp. 94-103. |
Yizong Cheng, Mean Shift, Mode Seeking, and Clustering, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 17, No. 8, Aug. 1995, pp. 790-799. |
EPO Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, for European application No. 08 846 475.5, dated Aug. 9, 2011, 4 pages. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan, for Publication No. 2004-242141. Date of publication of application: Aug. 24, 2004, Application No. 2003-030541, Color Defective Area Correction Method, Color Defective Area Correction Processing Program, and Image Processing Apparatus. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan, for Publication No. 2005-196385. Date of publication of application: Jul. 21, 2005, Application No. 2004-001007. Image Processing Apparatus, Image Processing Method and Digital Camera. |
Non-final Rejection, dated Jan. 26, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/551,282, filed Aug. 31, 2009. |
Non-final Rejection, dated Jan. 5, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/551,335, filed Aug. 31, 2009. |
Non-Final Rejection, datd May 3, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/957,633, filed Dec. 1, 2010. |
Non-Final Rejection, dated May 18, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/958,130, filed Dec. 1, 2010. |
Non-Final Rejection, dated May 3, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/957,594, filed Dec. 1, 2010. |
Notice of Allowance, dated Jun. 5, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 13/026,303, filed Feb. 14, 2011. |
Notice of Allowance, dated May 1, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/815,396, filed Jun. 14, 2010. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan, publication No. 05-019382, publication date: Jan. 29, 2003, Photographic Print Red-Eye Effect Correcting Method and Pictorial Hard Copying Device. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan, publication No. 05-224271, publication date: Sep. 3, 1993, Image Processor. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan, publication No. 2003-163861, publication date: Jun. 6, 2006, System and Method for Deciding When to Correct Image-Specific Defects Based on Camera, Scene, Display and Demographic Data. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan, publication No. 2003-209683, publication date: Jul. 25, 2003, Image Processing Equipment and Image Processing Method. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan, publication No. 2003-283849, publication date: Oct. 3, 2003, Method for Detecting and Correcting Red Eye. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan, publication No. 11-175699, publication date: Jul. 2, 1999, Picture Processor. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan, publication No. 02-064532, publication date: Mar. 5, 1990, Photographing Information Recordable Camera, and Information Outputting Device for Visualizing Object Information. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan, publication No. 2003-109008, publication date: Apr. 11, 2003, Method for Automatic Detection of Red-Eye Defect in Photographic Image Data. |
English Language Translation of JP 411284874 A. Document-identifier: JP 11284874 A. 2 Pages. |
Gaubatz M., Ulichney R., Automatic red-eye detection and correction, International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), (Sep. 22, 2002-Sep. 25, 2002), vol. 1,pp. 804-807, XP 010607446. |
Smolka B., Czubin K., Hardeberg J. Y., Plataniotis K. N., Szczepanski M., Wojciechowski K., Towards automatic redeye effect removal, Pattern Recognition Letters, 20030701, vol. 24, Nr:11, pp. 1767-1785 Publication info: XP 004416063, Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL EC. |
EPO Extended European Search Report, for European application No. 10164430.0, dated Sep. 6, 2010, including the extended European search report, pursuant to Rule 62 EPC, the European search report (R. 61 EPC) or the partial European search report/declaration of no search (R. 63 EPC) and the European search opinion, 8 pages. |
Corinne Vachier, Luc Vincent, Valuation of Image Extrema Using Alternating Filters by Reconstruction, Proceedings of the SPIE—The International Society for Optical Engineering, 1995, vol. 2568, pp. 94-103. |
EPO Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, for European patent application No. 05707215.9, report dated Sep. 14, 2010, 11 pages. |
EPO Communication under Rule 71(3) EPC, for European patent application No. 09706058.6, report dated Oct. 4, 2010, 6 pages. |
PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2008/055964, dated Jul. 30, 2008, 8 pages. |
PCT Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2008/055964, dated Jul. 24, 2008, 5 pages. |
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, for PCT Application No. PCT/US2008/055964, dated Sep. 8, 2009, 6 pages. |
Cuiping Zhang and Fernand S. Cohen, Component-Based Active Appearance Models for Face Modelling, D. Zhang and A.K. Jain (Eds.): ICB 2006, LNCS 3832, pp. 206-212, 2005, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005. |
Fundus Photograph Reading Center—Modified 3-Standard Field Color Fundus Photography and Fluorescein Angiography Procedure, Retrieved from the Internet on Oct. 19, 2011, URL: http://eyephoto.ophth.wisc.edu/Photography/Protocols/mod3-ver1.4.html, 3 pages. |
Anatomy of the Eye, Retrieved from the Internet on Oct. 19, 2011, URL: http://www.stlukeseye.com/anatomy, 3 pages. |
Fovea centralis, Retrieved from the Internet on Oct. 19, 2011, URL:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fovea, 4 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Apr. 28, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/936,085, filed Nov. 7, 2007. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Apr. 28, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/937,377, filed Nov. 8, 2007. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Mar. 31, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/551,312, filed Aug. 31, 2009. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed May 2, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/824,214, filed Jun. 27, 2010. |
Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 4, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/611,387, filed Nov. 3, 2009. |
Notice of Allowance mailed Mar. 3, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/543,405, filed Aug. 18, 2009. |
Final Office Action mailed Feb. 16, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/543,405, filed Aug. 18, 2009. |
Final Office Action mailed Jan. 5, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/611,387, filed Nov. 3, 2009. |
Notice of Allowance mailed May 12, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/043,025, filed Mar. 5, 2008. |
Final Office Action mailed Feb. 2, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/613,457, filed Nov. 5, 2009. |
Notice of Allowance mailed Mar. 17, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/042,335, filed Mar. 5, 2008. |
Patent Abstracts of Japan, for Publication No. JP2002-247596, published Aug. 30, 2002, (Appl. No. 2001-044807), Program for Specifying Red Eye Area in Image, Image Processor and Recording Medium, 1 Page. |
Agrawal A. et al., “Removing photography artifacts using gradient projection and flash-exposure sampling” ACM Transactions on Graphics , 2005, pp. 828-835. |
Final Office Action mailed Apr. 26, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/773,092, filed Feb. 4, 2004. |
Final Office Action mailed Apr. 26, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/690,834, filed Mar. 25, 2007. |
Final Office Action mailed Apr. 26, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/772,427, filed Feb. 2, 2007. |
Final Office Action mailed Apr. 26, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/035,416, filed Feb. 21, 2008. |
Final Office Action mailed Mar. 24, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/462,035, filed Aug. 2, 2006. |
Final Office Action mailed Nov. 20, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/192,897, filed Aug. 15, 2008. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Aug. 30, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/841,855, filed Aug. 20, 2007. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Aug. 5, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/462,035, filed Aug. 2, 2006. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed May 3, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/187,763, filed Aug. 7, 2008. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed May 4, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/192,335, filed Aug. 15, 2008. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Oct. 29, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/194,148, filed Aug. 19, 2008. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Sep. 17, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/690,834, filed Mar. 25, 2007. |
Non-Final Office Action mailed Sep. 21, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/773,092, filed Feb. 4, 2004. |
Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 1, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 10/919,226, filed Aug. 16, 2004. |
Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 19, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/119,614, filed May 13, 2008. |
Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 19, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/194,148, filed Aug. 19, 2008. |
Notice of Allowance mailed Jun. 27, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/192,897, filed Aug. 15, 2008. |
Notice of Allowance mailed Nov. 18, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/282,954, filed Nov. 18, 2005. |
Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 15, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/554,539, filed Oct. 30, 2006. |
PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for PCT Application No. PCT/EP2009/005809, dated Nov. 24, 2009, 12 pages. |
PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration, for PCT Application No. PCT/EP2009/006361, dated Nov. 24, 2009, 10 pages. |
Tatsutoshi Kitajima (JP04-192681 English Translation; Electronic Camera, Jul. 10, 1992). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120120274 A1 | May 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12960487 | Dec 2010 | US |
Child | 13357548 | US | |
Parent | 12558859 | Sep 2009 | US |
Child | 12960487 | US | |
Parent | 11282955 | Nov 2005 | US |
Child | 12558859 | US |