This invention relates generally to a system for evaluating the performance of a combustor power plant and, more particularly, to a method and apparatus for detecting the onset of combustor hardware damage and to power plants incorporating such methods and systems.
The profitable operation of combined-cycle power plants is a difficult and complex problem to evaluate and optimize. The performance of modern combined-cycle power plants is strongly influenced by various factors including environmental factors (e.g., ambient temperature and pressure) and operational factors (e.g., power production levels and cogeneration steam load requirements).
In some cases, issues develop with respect to particular combustor cans in a power plant that result in undesirable operating conditions or even damage to gas turbine combustion systems. For example, particular cans can have mechanical problems relating to fuel nozzles, liners, transient pieces, transient piece sides, radial seals, or impingement sleeves. These problems can lead to damage, inefficiencies, or blow outs due to combustion hardware damage.
In one aspect, the present invention therefore provides a method for determining when a combustor is experiencing hardware damage. The method includes sensing acoustic vibrations of a plurality of combustor cans, determining a center frequency for each acoustic tone of the sensed acoustic vibrations within a predetermined frequency range, and indicating an alarm when a center frequency of one or more of the combustor cans changes in a different manner compared to a representative center frequency of the plurality of combustor cans.
In another aspect, the present invention provides a system for determining when a combustor is experiencing hardware damage. The system includes a plurality of sensors configured to sense acoustic vibrations of a plurality of combustor cans, a processor configured to determine a center frequency for each acoustic tone of the sensed acoustic vibrations within a predetermined frequency range, and an alarm responsive to the processor. The processor is configured to activate the alarm when a center frequency of one or more of the combustor cans changes in a different manner compared to a representative center frequency of the plurality of combustor cans.
In yet another aspect, the present invention provides a power generating plant that includes a plurality of combustion cans, a plurality of sensors configured to sense acoustic vibrations of a plurality of combustor cans, a processor configured to determine a center frequency for each acoustic tone of the sensed acoustic vibrations within a predetermined frequency range, and an alarm responsive to the processor. The processor is configured to activate the alarm when a center frequency of one or more of the combustor cans changes in a different manner compared to a representative center frequency of the plurality of combustor cans.
It will thus be seen that configurations of the present invention are useful to provide advanced warning and protection for gas turbine combustion systems. For example, configurations of the present invention can be used to warn operators that a particular combustion can has issues revealed by an unusual combustion temperature and resulting “center” frequency that must be addressed by corrective action. Temperature differences determined by configurations of the present invention (or other data indicative of such temperature differences) can also be input to a control system algorithm to actively control a fuel split to increase blow out margin when a machine is at risk of a trip from a lean blow out resulting from combustion hardware damage.
Some configurations of the present invention provide a method for determining when a combustor is starting to develop hardware damage. Also, an alarm is generated to indicate that corrective action is required. Thus, one technical effect of the present invention is the indication of an alarm to indicate the need for corrective action when a combustor starts to become damaged. To make this determination, the frequency of one of the acoustic modes (i.e., a standing wave generated at one or more resonance frequencies of combustor) occurring inside the combustion chamber is measured. The acoustic mode travels in a direction transverse to an axis of the combustion liner. The frequency of the acoustic mode is dependent upon combustor dimensions and the speed of sound inside the combustion chamber, the latter in turn being dependent upon the gas inside the combustion chamber. The speed of sound of the gas may be determined from the temperature and properties of the gas.
For example, and referring to
Some configurations of the present invention determine temperature inside a combustion can 102 chamber using a measurement of resonant frequency of the chamber in combination with knowledge of the combustor dimensions and gas properties. Thus, in some configurations of the present invention, alarm 132 is indicated as damage begins, before significant damage has occurred. When the damage begins, an automated warning signal is indicated so that either manual or automated corrective action, or both, can be taken to correct the problem on the spot and prevent a worsening of the condition. More particularly, from equation 1 or from equation 2, the resonant frequency of a combustor is proportional to the square root of the flame temperature within the combustion liner.
Hence frequency is proportional to the square root of flame temperature within the combustion liner.
Thus, in some configurations and referring to
A representative list of tone frequencies and differences for a system having fourteen combustion cans is shown in
The magnitude of the difference is proportional to the square root of the temperature difference of each can relative to the median frequency can temperature, as indicated by equation 2. As the combustor load is changed, the peak frequency of each can also changes, but the difference relative to the median frequency can should remain the same, and thus at approximately the same relative temperature difference to the median frequency can. A drift away from the median can frequency by any can is assumed to indicate that something has changed in the can, and such a change may be indicative of combustor hardware damage. For example and referring to
Example: Decrease in relative temperature of combustor.
In
Example: Increase in relative temperature of combustor.
Suppose, as in
Referring to flow chart 700 of
If FTmedAMP is greater than a predetermined minimum value CDAFTE (for example, 0.1 PSI) at 712, then it is assumed that a flame temperature acoustic tone is present, and execution resumes by setting 714 a loop variable (N in this example) so that each monitored can is checked. Next, a current difference frequency FT_DIFF[N] is determined 716 for can N by setting FT_DIFF[N] to FTFRQ[N], i.e., the current “center” or peak frequency determined at 708 for can N, minus the current median frequency found at 710, namely, FTMEDFRQ.
In some configurations of the present invention, a variable LBCR[N] can be set at any time by a user input button or by use of keyboard or mouse commands to indicate that a baseline for can N is to be reset relative to the current median frequency FTMEDFRQ. Thus, if LBCR[N] is set at 718, the difference FT_DIFF[N] is stored 720 in variable FT_DIFF_REF[N] and LBCR[N] is reset 722 and ready to be set again by operator command.
If LBCR[N] is not set at 718, or after the branch 720, 722 is executed, the difference FT_DIFF[N]−FT_DIFF_NREF[N] is determined at 724. If this difference is greater than a predetermined allowable deviation ALM2 from the baseline for “alarm2,” then an alarm is indicated 726 for combustor can N running much hotter relative to the combustor can represented by the median frequency. Execution then continues by checking 740 whether the can represented by N is the last combustor can, and if so, the function returns at 744. (In some configurations, the function is immediately re-executed starting from 702.) Otherwise, can counter N is incremented at 742 and execution resumes at 716 to check conditions at the next can.
If the test fails at 724, a test 728 is performed to determine whether the same difference checked at 724 is greater than a predetermined allowable deviation ALM1 from the baseline for “alarm1.” If so, then an alarm is indicated at 730 for combustor can N running hotter (as opposed to “much hotter”) relative to median. If the alarm is indicated at 730, execution continues at 740 as above. Otherwise, test 728 failed, and the same difference checked at 724 is checked at 732 to determine whether the difference is less than a negative value, −ALM2. If so, then an alarm is indicated at 734 for combustor can N running much cooler relative to median. If the alarm at 734 is indicated, execution continues at 740. Otherwise, another check is made of the same difference at 736 to determine whether this difference is less than a negative value, −ALM1. If so, then an alarm is indicated at 738 for combustor can N running cooler (as opposed to “much cooler”) relative to median. In this case, execution continues at 740 regardless of whether the alarm is indicated at 738. Thus, in some configurations of the present invention, an alarm is indicated when a center frequency of one or more combustor cans changes in a different manner compared to a representative center (e.g., median center) frequency of the plurality of combustor cans. This alarm indication, in some configurations, comprises indicating one of a plurality of alarms 726, 730, 734, 738 depending upon whether the center frequency of the one or more combustor cans changes in a manner indicating a higher temperature or a lower temperature, and upon the magnitude of the temperature difference.
In some configurations of the present invention, ALM1 is a predetermined constant (e.g., 15 Hz) that represents an allowable deviation from baseline for the “hotter” and “cooler” alarms, and ALM2 is a different predetermined constant (e.g., 25 Hz) that represents an allowable deviation from baseline for the “much hotter” and “much cooler” alarms. In some configurations, ALM1 and ALM2 are configurable by a user and can be set for a particular installation based upon either empirical or other information. Although the hot and cool alarms are symmetric in the configuration described herein (i.e., a positive deviation generates a hot alarm and a negative deviation of the same magnitude generates a cool alarm), non-symmetric alarms can be provided as a design choice in some configurations. Moreover, although two different alarms are provided for both hot alarms for cool alarms, any number of alarms indicative of different amounts of deviation can be provided for hot and/or cold alarms. In some configurations, also as a design choice, only hot alarms are checked and indicated, or only cold alarms are checked and indicated. Various combinations of these design choices are also possible in other configurations. Also, in the flow chart of
Configurations of the present invention are thus useful to provide advanced warning and protection for gas turbine combustion systems. For example, configurations of the present invention can be used to warn operators that a particular combustion can has issues revealed by an unusual combustion temperature and resulting “center” frequency that must be addressed by corrective action. These issues may involve mechanical problems with fuel nozzles, liners, transient pieces, transient piece side or radial seals or impingement sleeves, for example. Temperature differences determined by configurations of the present invention (or other data indicative of such temperature differences) can be input to a control system algorithm such as that disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,591,225 issued Jul. 8, 2003 to Adelman et al. to actively control a fuel split to increase blow out margin when a machine is at risk of a trip from a lean blow out resulting from combustion hardware damage.
While the invention has been described in terms of various specific embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the invention can be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope of the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4644783 | Roberts et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
6461144 | Gutmark et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6591225 | Adelman et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6634457 | Paschereit et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
20050144955 | Handelsman et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070062196 A1 | Mar 2007 | US |