Method and apparatus to determine the overall fitness of a test subject

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9615785
  • Patent Number
    9,615,785
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, March 31, 2010
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 11, 2017
    7 years ago
Abstract
A procedure and apparatus to determine the overall fitness of a test subject. For this purpose the qualitative and temporal progression of the heart rate under constant physical stress of the subject is prescribed with at least one parameter dependent on the subject. The heart rate of the subject is measured under constant physical stress during a period of time. The parameter(s) are determined from the measured values, and the maximum heart rate and/or the initial heart rate and/or the increase characteristic of the heart rate are determined from the function and the measured values by numerical procedures. The apparatus can measure the heart rate of the subject, record a temporal progression of the heart rate under physical stress, and determines numerically from the temporal progression of the heart rate, the maximum heart rate and/or the initial heart rate without physical stress and/or the increase characteristic of the heart rate.
Description
STATE OF THE ART

The invention relates to a procedure and an apparatus to determine the overall fitness of a test subject.


The overall fitness of a human test subject is determined by its endurance. Endurance capacity depends on various physiological factors. These include for example, age, gender, height, weight, body fat and the extent of a test subject's workout. Endurance capacity can be determined, for example, by the maximum heart rate, initial heart rate and/or the increase pattern of the heart rate during physical activity. In connection with performance diagnostics, the most precise determination possible of endurance is of great interest. For instance, endurance is an important forecasting factor for the risk of developing cardiovascular disease. Moreover endurance is a good measure for the ability to cope with everyday physical demands. In addition the success of athletic or preventive training can be optimized or objectified by taking endurance performance into account. Precise measurement of endurance in performance diagnostics thus enables, for example, the issuing of workout recommendations for leisure sports, workout control in endurance sports, workout regulation in rehabilitation, objective performance forecasting for competitive sports, the determination or evaluation of a functional impairment in the case of severe, chronic medical disorders, such as heart failure, pre-operative evaluation for specific diseases, for example on a question of a heart transplant or partial lung resection, the evaluation of occupational health and preventative sports.


Procedures for determining endurance capacity (or performance) are known from performance diagnostics in which the test subject undergoes a stress test which matches in form and duration the stress for which a statement is to be made. For example a test of about 30 minutes occurs with increasing load intensity on a treadmill to measure performance in long-distance running. In such a test, in addition to physical performance, heart rate and lactate concentration in the blood are determined as well. Evidence on performance in long-distance running can be obtained with great precision by the temporal progression of these metrics. Appropriate stress tests are known for other areas. For this purpose, for example, ergometers are used for bicycles, rowing machines, canoes, hand bikes and hand cranks. The so-called anaerobic threshold is often used as a benchmark for endurance. This value can be determined from the results of a performance diagnostic by using various methods.


The well-known procedures to determine the overall fitness of a test subject have the disadvantage of being very costly in time and equipment and are associated with very high physical demands on the person being tested. These high physical demands as well as high expenses for payments and staff to carry out the known methods have thus far prevented a wide application, for example, in fitness rooms and gymnasiums as well as with athletic companies. There are also methods known in which endurance capacity can be determined without physical strain, however these lead to inaccurate results.


The task of the invention is to make a procedure and an apparatus available to determine the overall fitness of a test subject, which lead to an exact and reproducible result without exposing the subject to high physical strain over a long period, and without relying on a high cost of time and equipment.


THE INVENTION AND ITS ADVANTAGES

The task is resolved by a procedure and an apparatus as described herein. The procedure according to the invention is characterized by the qualitative temporal progression of the heart rate during constant physical strain as a mathematical function with at least one parameter entered relative to the test subject. This takes advantage of the fact that the heart rate exhibits a known typical progression characteristic at the onset of sudden physical stress. The temporal progression of the heart rate is characterized by a first segment with an initially slow increase at the start of physical stress, followed by a second segment with rapid increase as the physical stress is maintained, and then a third segment with a decreasing trend of the heart rate. The second segment typically begins after 3 to 5 seconds of the physical workout. In the third segment the heart rate approaches a stable value, whereby this value no longer changes within a given measurement precision during prolonged constant physical stress. It is designated as the maximum heart rate of this form of strain. This value is typically reached after 2 to 3 minutes of physical exercise. Due to the initially slow increase, followed by a segment with a more rapid increase and an approach to the maximum value, the course qualitatively equals the curve of a hyperbola. The time intervals of the first, second and third segments, as well as the maximum and minimum values of the heart rate, are different from one subject to another, and also depend on the intensity and the duration of the strain. The qualitative temporal progression of the heart rate however is the same for all test subjects and all types of physical strain. The parameters of this function are determined by measuring the heart rate of a subject under constant physical stress. Typically a constant physical stress lasting from 5 to 50 seconds is enough for this. For most subjects a physical stress lasting from 20 to 30 seconds is sufficient to determine the parameters of the mathematical function with high accuracy. If the parameters of the function are ascertained, the maximum heart rate can be determined by numerical procedures, for example, extrapolation. Non-linear procedures to optimize parameters, for example, are appropriate to use in determining parameters from measured values of the heart rate. These include, for instance, a so-called curve-fitting by using the Marquard-Levenberg algorithm.


The initial heart rate corresponds to the heart rate of a test subject at rest without physical stress. Often the subject already has an elevated heart rate compared to the initial heart rate at the beginning of the measurement of his heart rate, as he has already moved previously, even only a little, or is excited. The output heart rate can be determined from the function provided with ascertained parameters by means of numerical procedures, for example, extrapolation.


Furthermore the increase characteristics of the heart rate over time can be determined from the function provided with parameters. This includes, for example, the maximum slope of the function. Precisely as the maximum heart rate and the initial heart rate do, it gives an indication of the overall fitness of a subject, especially of his endurance capacity.


The maximum heart rate, the initial heart rate and the increase characteristic can be determined alternatively or cumulatively. Any pair of the quantities can also be determined.


To determine the overall fitness of a test subject it is sufficient for the subject to undergo a constant physical workout within a brief period of less than 50 seconds and during this time the heart rate of the subject is continuously measured. For this purpose, the subject performs a physical movement with cardiopulmonary strain. The subject must neither begin with the physical workout at his initial heart rate nor undergo it until reaching his maximum heart rate. With reference to the three segments of the increase of heart rate in a physical workout mentioned earlier, the measured values of the heart rate are preferably determined in the second segment. The values of the heart rate necessary to determine the overall fitness are measured before the subject begins to perspire. The procedure used by the invention can thus be applied in sports shops and informational events.


The determination of the maximum heart rate and/or the initial heart rate and/or increase characteristic of the heart rate results from the measured values of the heart rate by means of mathematical formulas. A computer can be used for this purpose. The procedure according to the invention is distinguished by low cost in terms of hardware and time. Moreover the test subject must undergo merely a brief physical workout. Toggle-running, squatting jumps, bicycling on an ergometer, running on a treadmill or using a stair-climber or some other ergometer, for example, are suitable for this. Due to the brief duration of typically under 60 seconds, the workout is so short that the subject is not physically exhausted from it.


Since the determination of the maximum heart rate comes about by using a physical stress test of a subject, the procedure delivers accurate values applicable to the subject.


Endurance capacity and other relevant quantities, for example, a recommendation for a body workout of the subject, can be calculated based on the maximum heart rate and/or the initial heart rate and/or the increase characteristic. A multivariant model calculation is suitable for this, for example. By means of mathematical-statistical methods, determining factors can be filtered out from a set of possibilities which indicate a significant predicative potential for a desired target quantity. An example of this type of procedure is Stepwise Multiple Regression. The procedure according to the invention enables, for example, the determination of performance at the anaerobic threshold with great accuracy. Other physiological factors of a test subject can be considered for targeting exact and reproducible values for endurance capacity, for example, age, gender, body size, weight, body fat, or abdominal or femoral girth. By considering this anamnetical information, the accuracy of endurance capacity derived from the measured values can be increased.


Along with the determination of endurance capacity, additional information for a workout recommendation for a test subject can be ascertained with the procedure according to the invention. For example it can be determined how high the heart rate should climb for an optimal endurance workout. Moreover a recommendation can be made for performance during a body workout. In a running workout, for example, the speed is entered at which the test subject should be moving forward. Furthermore the effect of an endurance workout can be determined from the relationship between performance and maximum heart rate. For this, the performance during physical stress must be determined in addition to the heart rate.


In an advantageous embodiment of the invention, an ongoing calculative plausibility test can occur to improve the result. On the basis of this plausibility test the physical stress for example can be terminated at an earlier point in time or even prolonged to a certain duration. This is the case, for example, when the determination of the parameters of the mathematical function is concluded after a short time, or when the measurement must be repeated for reasons of quality. The test subject can be informed about this with an optical indicator.


In another advantageous embodiment of the procedure according to the invention, the performance of the test subject is additionally determined during physical stress. With physical stress in the form of a toggle-run or squatting jumps, the performance can be determined, for example, by means of a measuring plate for measuring ground reaction forces. Performance is calculated from the frequency of paces and from the force exerted onto the measuring plate. If the test subject undergoes physical stress on an ergometer, the performance can be determined by means of detectors integrated into the ergometer for repetition rates and/or force. By noting maximum heart rate in relationship to associated performance, endurance capacity can be determined with better quality and accuracy. Moreover the establishment of other relevant quantities is possible. Among these, for example, is the heart rate of the test subject for an optimal endurance workout.


In another advantageous embodiment of the procedure according to the invention, the performance is monitored during the time period and held constant within pre-determined limits. Physical stress with constant performance during the measurement of the heart rate has the advantage that the maximum heart rate can be determined with great accuracy.


In another advantageous embodiment of the procedure according to the invention, the test subject is informed about adherence to and/or deviation from constant performance. During the physical stress he is thereby motivated and maintained to move with constant performance.


In another advantageous embodiment of the procedure according to the invention, endurance capacity is determined from the maximum heart rate and/or the output heart rate and/or the increase characteristic of the heart rate. Thus the performance of the test subject can be considered during physical stress. A multivariant model calculation and/or a multifactorial forecast model is suitable to determine endurance capacity.


In another advantageous embodiment of the procedure according to the invention, the parameters of the function are determined at every heartbeat detected in the test subject. This enables an especially rapid calculation of the parameters.


In another advantageous embodiment of the procedure according to the invention, the measurement of the heart rate is ended, when the parameters from at least two successive heartbeats differentiate by less than a pre-determined value. Furthermore the measurement of the heart rate can be continued under physical stress as long as the slope of the associated heart rate-time function continues to climb. It can, for example, be ended as soon as the slope falls.


In another advantageous embodiment of the procedure according to the invention, the qualitative temporal progression of the heart rate is determined as a mathematical function of the temporal progression of multiple test subjects under physical stress.


In another advantageous embodiment of the procedure according to the invention, the predominant portion of muscular mass of the test subject is put under dynamic and constant strain during physical stress. For this purpose the subject is subjected to physical stress in which the muscles of the arms, legs and upper torso are exerted. For example, in toggle-running additional weights can be carried in the hands and moved. In physical stress of the entire muscular mass the need for metabolizing oxygen is high, which results in a very accurate result for the maximum heart rate.


The apparatus according to the invention with the features of claim 12 are distinguished by being equipped with an installation to measure the heart rate of the test subject with a storage device to record a mathematical function for the temporal progression of the heart rate under physical stress and with a calculating device to calculate the parameters of the mathematical function from the measured values of the heart rate and to numerically determine the maximum heart rate and/or the initial heart rate without physical stress and/or the increase characteristic of the heart rate from the function provided with the calculated parameters. A computer, for example, is suitable for this.


In another advantageous embodiment of the apparatus according to the invention, this is equipped with a device to execute a physical movement with cardiopulmonary strain of a test subject. This can involve, for example, a bicycle ergometer, a rowing machine ergometer, a canoe ergometer, a handbike ergometer, a hand crank ergometer or a treadmill.


In another advantageous embodiment of the apparatus according to the invention, this is equipped with a device to determine performance generated by movement.


In another advantageous embodiment of the apparatus according to the invention, this is equipped with a plate to measure ground reaction forces.


Other advantages and advantageous embodiments of the invention can be found in the following description, the drawings and the claims.





FIGURE

The procedural steps of the invention are schematically represented in the Figures, which show the following:



FIG. 1 Flow diagram of the procedure to determine endurance capacity,



FIG. 2 Typical temporal progression of heart rate under physical stress,



FIG. 3 Schematic illustrations of data capturing and the determination of the overall fitness of a test subject.





In the procedure schematically depicted in FIG. 1 a test subject undergoes a stress test for a duration of 20 to 25 seconds. For this purpose the subject carries out a movement with or without an exercise device with cardiopulmonary strain. During the stress test the heart rate is constantly measured so that every heartbeat is noted. By calculative extrapolation the measured values and mathematical function represented in FIG. 2 are used to determine the maximum heart rate of the subject. Parallel to this the performance of the subject is ascertained during the stress test. The relationship between heart rate and performance can also be determined. Those flow together with the maximum heart rate into a multifunctional forecast model. Moreover other physiological factors of the subject are entered, such as age, gender, body size, weight, body fat and extent of the subject's workout. Endurance capacity is determined from all quantities entered. This is used for calculating workout recommendations, interpretations and reports on the subject.



FIG. 2 shows as an example the mathematical function of a test subject's heart rate over time during physical stress. The associated curve 1 begins at initial heart rate 2, which the test subject exhibits while at rest without physical stress and without mental tension. In an initial segment up to 5 seconds the heart rate climbs only slightly. In a second segment from 5 seconds to 35 seconds the heart rate increases rapidly. In a third segment after 35 seconds the slope falls. The heart rate approaches the maximum heart rate 3. The subject begins at time-point 0 seconds with a stress workout. From 12 seconds to 35 seconds the heart rate is measured. After this both the measurement and the stress workout can be ended. The measured values of the heart rate are represented by points 4. The curve is determined from measured values by means of curve fitting. Moreover the parameters of the associated mathematical function are determined.


In FIG. 3 the capturing of data and the determination of the overall fitness of a test subject are schematically represented. The heart rate under physical stress is measured as data from 20 to 30 seconds and physical data of the subject is retrieved. From the measured data of the heart rate and the qualitative pre-determined temporal progression of the heart rate, the associated mathematical function is ascertained by means of curve fitting. The image represented corresponds to FIG. 2. From the function of the data retrieved from the subject and by means of model calculation, endurance capacity, a report concerning fitness, workout recommendation and biological age of the test subject are determined. Here one is dealing with approximate values which have a high level of accuracy.


All features of the invention can be essential to the invention both individually and in any combination with each other.

Claims
  • 1. A method to determine the overall fitness of a test subject comprising the following procedural steps: entering of a qualitative temporal progression of a heart rate under constant physical stress of a subject as a mathematical function with at least one parameter dependent on the subject,measuring of the heart rate of the test subject under continuous physical strain during a period of time,determining the parameter(s) of the mathematical function from the measured values,determining by a numerical process an increase characteristic of the heart rate from the maximum slope of the function and the measured values;wherein the test subject undergoes a constant physical workout within a brief period of less than 50 seconds and during the brief period the heart rate of the test subject is continuously measured.
  • 2. The method according to claim 1, further comprising determining additionally a performance of the subject during physical stress.
  • 3. The method according to claim 2, further comprising monitoring performance during the time period and maintaining it within pre-determined limits.
  • 4. The method according to claim 3, further comprising informing the subject about deviation from constant performance.
  • 5. The method according to claim 1, further comprising determining endurance capacity from the initial heart rate and/or the increase characteristic of the heart rate.
  • 6. The method according to claim 5, further comprising entering physical features the subject and considering them in determining endurance capacity.
  • 7. The method according to claim 1, further comprising determining a workout recommendation for the subject from the increase characteristic of the heart rate.
  • 8. The method according to claim 1, further comprising calculating the parameters of the mathematical function at each heartbeat determined from the subject.
  • 9. The method according to claim 8, further comprising terminating the measurement of the heart rate when the parameters determined from at least two successive heartbeats differ by less than a pre-determined value.
  • 10. The method according to claim 1, further comprising determining the qualitative temporal progression of the heart rate as a mathematical function the temporal progression of the heart rate of multiple subjects under physical stress.
  • 11. The method according to claim 1, wherein during physical stress the predominant portion of the muscular mass of the subject is under stress constantly and dynamically.
  • 12. The method according to claim 1, wherein the maximum heart rate is determined from the increase characteristic of the heart rate determined from the function and the measured values.
  • 13. The method according to claim 1, wherein the initial heart rate is determined from the increase characteristic of the heart rate determined from the function and the measured values.
  • 14. An apparatus to determine the overall fitness of a subject, comprising a device to measure the heart rate of the subject, a storage device to record a mathematical function for the temporal progression the heart rate under physical stress, and a calculating device configured to calculate parameters of the mathematical function from the measured values of the heart rate and to determine numerically the increase characteristic of the heart rate from the maximum slope of the function provided with the calculated parameters, wherein the device to measure the heart rate of the subject is configured to continuously measure the rate of the subject during a brief period of less than 50 seconds within which the subject undergoes a constant physical workout.
  • 15. The apparatus according to claim 14, further comprising a device to carry out physical movement with cardiopulmonary strain on a subject.
  • 16. The apparatus according to claim 15, further comprising a device to determine performance generated during movement.
  • 17. The apparatus according to claim 14, further comprising a plate to measure ground reaction forces.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
10 2009 015 273 Apr 2009 DE national
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind 371c Date
PCT/DE2010/000371 3/31/2010 WO 00 10/20/2011
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO2010/112010 10/7/2010 WO A
US Referenced Citations (158)
Number Name Date Kind
3742937 Manuel et al. Jul 1973 A
3802698 Burian et al. Apr 1974 A
3838684 Manuel et al. Oct 1974 A
3978849 Geneen Sep 1976 A
4027663 Fischler et al. Jun 1977 A
4038976 Hardy et al. Aug 1977 A
4120294 Wolfe Oct 1978 A
4120296 Prinz Oct 1978 A
4221223 Linden Sep 1980 A
4248244 Charnitski et al. Feb 1981 A
4252128 Kane Feb 1981 A
4364556 Otte Dec 1982 A
4436096 Dyck et al. Mar 1984 A
4647217 Havel Mar 1987 A
4653498 New, Jr. et al. Mar 1987 A
4776323 Spector Oct 1988 A
4788983 Brink et al. Dec 1988 A
4938228 Righter et al. Jul 1990 A
5158093 Shvartz et al. Oct 1992 A
5314389 Dotan May 1994 A
5686938 Batkhan Nov 1997 A
5697791 Nashner et al. Dec 1997 A
5735799 Baba et al. Apr 1998 A
5769755 Henry et al. Jun 1998 A
5857939 Kaufman Jan 1999 A
5891042 Sham et al. Apr 1999 A
5976083 Richardson et al. Nov 1999 A
6002982 Fry Dec 1999 A
6010430 Mankovtiz Jan 2000 A
6013007 Root et al. Jan 2000 A
6050924 Shea Apr 2000 A
6080110 Thorgersen Jun 2000 A
6080111 Pao-Lang Jun 2000 A
6104947 Heikkila et al. Aug 2000 A
6133722 Havel Oct 2000 A
6135951 Richardson et al. Oct 2000 A
6148262 Fry Nov 2000 A
6163718 Fabrizio Dec 2000 A
6230047 McHugh May 2001 B1
6244988 Delman Jun 2001 B1
6251048 Kaufman Jun 2001 B1
6345197 Fabrizio Feb 2002 B1
6394960 Shinogi et al. May 2002 B1
6463385 Fry Oct 2002 B1
6572636 Hagen et al. Jun 2003 B1
6582342 Kaufman Jun 2003 B2
6585622 Shum et al. Jul 2003 B1
6607493 Song Aug 2003 B2
6716139 Hosseinzadeh-Dolkhani et al. Apr 2004 B1
6734837 Havel May 2004 B1
6736759 Stubbs et al. May 2004 B1
6745069 Nissila et al. Jun 2004 B2
6749432 French et al. Jun 2004 B2
6753882 Nakazawa et al. Jun 2004 B2
6758816 Tsubata et al. Jul 2004 B1
6798378 Walters Sep 2004 B1
6823036 Chen Nov 2004 B1
6832109 Nissila Dec 2004 B2
6837827 Lee et al. Jan 2005 B1
6853955 Burrell et al. Feb 2005 B1
6882955 Ohlenbusch et al. Apr 2005 B1
7057551 Vogt Jun 2006 B1
7062225 White Jun 2006 B2
7076291 Pulkkinen et al. Jul 2006 B2
7081809 Mix et al. Jul 2006 B1
7085678 Burrell et al. Aug 2006 B1
7097588 Watterson et al. Aug 2006 B2
7192387 Mendel Mar 2007 B2
7192402 Amano et al. Mar 2007 B2
7220220 Stubbs et al. May 2007 B2
7229385 Freeman et al. Jun 2007 B2
7251454 White Jul 2007 B2
7254516 Case, Jr. et al. Aug 2007 B2
7264554 Bentley Sep 2007 B2
7292867 Werner et al. Nov 2007 B2
7383081 Butt et al. Jun 2008 B2
7398151 Burrell et al. Jul 2008 B1
7480512 Graham et al. Jan 2009 B2
7518054 McKinney et al. Apr 2009 B2
7519327 White Apr 2009 B2
7603255 Case, Jr. et al. Oct 2009 B2
7648463 Elhag et al. Jan 2010 B1
7670263 Ellis et al. Mar 2010 B2
7689283 Schecter Mar 2010 B1
7758469 Dyer et al. Jul 2010 B2
7766794 Oliver et al. Aug 2010 B2
7771320 Riley et al. Aug 2010 B2
7909737 Ellis et al. Mar 2011 B2
7927253 Vincent et al. Apr 2011 B2
8001472 Gilley et al. Aug 2011 B2
8033959 Oleson et al. Oct 2011 B2
8052580 Saalasti et al. Nov 2011 B2
8068858 Werner et al. Nov 2011 B2
8103517 Hinnebusch Jan 2012 B2
8105208 Oleson et al. Jan 2012 B2
8121785 Swisher et al. Feb 2012 B2
8360936 DiBenedetto et al. Jan 2013 B2
8529407 Nurmela et al. Sep 2013 B2
20010003542 Kita Jun 2001 A1
20020055419 Hinnebusch May 2002 A1
20020068873 Nissila Jun 2002 A1
20020156386 Dardik Oct 2002 A1
20020198463 Dardik et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030028116 Bimbaum Feb 2003 A1
20030069108 Kaiserman et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030171189 Kaufman Sep 2003 A1
20030224337 Shum et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040046692 Robson et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040102931 Ellis et al. May 2004 A1
20040116784 Gavish Jun 2004 A1
20040171956 Babashan Sep 2004 A1
20040199056 Husemann et al. Oct 2004 A1
20050049113 Yuch et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050124463 Yeo et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050181347 Barnes et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050195094 White Sep 2005 A1
20050197063 White Sep 2005 A1
20050256416 Chen Nov 2005 A1
20050266961 Shum et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060136173 Case, Jr. et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060169125 Ashkenazi et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060189360 White Aug 2006 A1
20060253210 Rosenberg Nov 2006 A1
20070006489 Case, Jr. et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070011919 Case, Jr. Jan 2007 A1
20070021269 Shum Jan 2007 A1
20070033069 Rao et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070159926 Prstojevich et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070232455 Hanoun Oct 2007 A1
20070260421 Berner, Jr. et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070287596 Case et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080002528 Andren et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080004510 Tanzawa et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080009275 Werner et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080033311 Sledge Feb 2008 A1
20080051993 Graham et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080058971 Graham et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080059064 Werner et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080065319 Graham et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080096726 Riley et al. Apr 2008 A1
20080101161 Imai et al. May 2008 A1
20080103689 Graham et al. May 2008 A1
20080171636 Usui et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080200310 Tagliabue Aug 2008 A1
20080319661 Werner et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090047645 Dibenedetto et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090048044 Oleson et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090048070 Vincent et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090233769 Pryor Sep 2009 A1
20090233770 Vincent et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090233771 Quatrochi et al. Sep 2009 A1
20100056341 Ellis et al. Mar 2010 A1
20100075806 Montgomery Mar 2010 A1
20100292050 DiBenedetto et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100292599 Oleson et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100292600 Dibenedetto et al. Nov 2010 A1
20120244995 Dibenedetto et al. Sep 2012 A1
20140249661 Dibenedetto et al. Sep 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (18)
Number Date Country
407824 Nov 2000 AT
1448876 Oct 2003 CN
3920526 Jan 1991 DE
601 29 972 May 2008 DE
10 2007 025 664 Jan 2009 DE
1195135 Apr 2002 EP
2025369 Feb 2009 EP
2187554 Sep 1987 GB
H11-118953 Apr 1999 JP
2001-235560 Aug 2001 JP
2002-369709 Dec 2002 JP
3094882 Apr 2003 JP
2009-050699 Mar 2009 JP
0040151 Jul 2000 WO
WO-02067449 Aug 2002 WO
WO-2006065679 Jun 2006 WO
WO-2008101168 Aug 2008 WO
WO-2009033034 Mar 2009 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
German Patent Office, Counterpart Patent Application DE 10 2009 015 273.3, Search Report—issued Dec. 8, 2009.
Agnes Wittmann-Regis, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Parent PCT Application: PCT/DE2010/000371, issued Nov. 1, 2011, WIPO—Geneva, Switzerland.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120029370 A1 Feb 2012 US