The invention relates to a procedure and an apparatus to determine the overall fitness of a test subject.
The overall fitness of a human test subject is determined by its endurance. Endurance capacity depends on various physiological factors. These include for example, age, gender, height, weight, body fat and the extent of a test subject's workout. Endurance capacity can be determined, for example, by the maximum heart rate, initial heart rate and/or the increase pattern of the heart rate during physical activity. In connection with performance diagnostics, the most precise determination possible of endurance is of great interest. For instance, endurance is an important forecasting factor for the risk of developing cardiovascular disease. Moreover endurance is a good measure for the ability to cope with everyday physical demands. In addition the success of athletic or preventive training can be optimized or objectified by taking endurance performance into account. Precise measurement of endurance in performance diagnostics thus enables, for example, the issuing of workout recommendations for leisure sports, workout control in endurance sports, workout regulation in rehabilitation, objective performance forecasting for competitive sports, the determination or evaluation of a functional impairment in the case of severe, chronic medical disorders, such as heart failure, pre-operative evaluation for specific diseases, for example on a question of a heart transplant or partial lung resection, the evaluation of occupational health and preventative sports.
Procedures for determining endurance capacity (or performance) are known from performance diagnostics in which the test subject undergoes a stress test which matches in form and duration the stress for which a statement is to be made. For example a test of about 30 minutes occurs with increasing load intensity on a treadmill to measure performance in long-distance running. In such a test, in addition to physical performance, heart rate and lactate concentration in the blood are determined as well. Evidence on performance in long-distance running can be obtained with great precision by the temporal progression of these metrics. Appropriate stress tests are known for other areas. For this purpose, for example, ergometers are used for bicycles, rowing machines, canoes, hand bikes and hand cranks. The so-called anaerobic threshold is often used as a benchmark for endurance. This value can be determined from the results of a performance diagnostic by using various methods.
The well-known procedures to determine the overall fitness of a test subject have the disadvantage of being very costly in time and equipment and are associated with very high physical demands on the person being tested. These high physical demands as well as high expenses for payments and staff to carry out the known methods have thus far prevented a wide application, for example, in fitness rooms and gymnasiums as well as with athletic companies. There are also methods known in which endurance capacity can be determined without physical strain, however these lead to inaccurate results.
The task of the invention is to make a procedure and an apparatus available to determine the overall fitness of a test subject, which lead to an exact and reproducible result without exposing the subject to high physical strain over a long period, and without relying on a high cost of time and equipment.
The task is resolved by a procedure and an apparatus as described herein. The procedure according to the invention is characterized by the qualitative temporal progression of the heart rate during constant physical strain as a mathematical function with at least one parameter entered relative to the test subject. This takes advantage of the fact that the heart rate exhibits a known typical progression characteristic at the onset of sudden physical stress. The temporal progression of the heart rate is characterized by a first segment with an initially slow increase at the start of physical stress, followed by a second segment with rapid increase as the physical stress is maintained, and then a third segment with a decreasing trend of the heart rate. The second segment typically begins after 3 to 5 seconds of the physical workout. In the third segment the heart rate approaches a stable value, whereby this value no longer changes within a given measurement precision during prolonged constant physical stress. It is designated as the maximum heart rate of this form of strain. This value is typically reached after 2 to 3 minutes of physical exercise. Due to the initially slow increase, followed by a segment with a more rapid increase and an approach to the maximum value, the course qualitatively equals the curve of a hyperbola. The time intervals of the first, second and third segments, as well as the maximum and minimum values of the heart rate, are different from one subject to another, and also depend on the intensity and the duration of the strain. The qualitative temporal progression of the heart rate however is the same for all test subjects and all types of physical strain. The parameters of this function are determined by measuring the heart rate of a subject under constant physical stress. Typically a constant physical stress lasting from 5 to 50 seconds is enough for this. For most subjects a physical stress lasting from 20 to 30 seconds is sufficient to determine the parameters of the mathematical function with high accuracy. If the parameters of the function are ascertained, the maximum heart rate can be determined by numerical procedures, for example, extrapolation. Non-linear procedures to optimize parameters, for example, are appropriate to use in determining parameters from measured values of the heart rate. These include, for instance, a so-called curve-fitting by using the Marquard-Levenberg algorithm.
The initial heart rate corresponds to the heart rate of a test subject at rest without physical stress. Often the subject already has an elevated heart rate compared to the initial heart rate at the beginning of the measurement of his heart rate, as he has already moved previously, even only a little, or is excited. The output heart rate can be determined from the function provided with ascertained parameters by means of numerical procedures, for example, extrapolation.
Furthermore the increase characteristics of the heart rate over time can be determined from the function provided with parameters. This includes, for example, the maximum slope of the function. Precisely as the maximum heart rate and the initial heart rate do, it gives an indication of the overall fitness of a subject, especially of his endurance capacity.
The maximum heart rate, the initial heart rate and the increase characteristic can be determined alternatively or cumulatively. Any pair of the quantities can also be determined.
To determine the overall fitness of a test subject it is sufficient for the subject to undergo a constant physical workout within a brief period of less than 50 seconds and during this time the heart rate of the subject is continuously measured. For this purpose, the subject performs a physical movement with cardiopulmonary strain. The subject must neither begin with the physical workout at his initial heart rate nor undergo it until reaching his maximum heart rate. With reference to the three segments of the increase of heart rate in a physical workout mentioned earlier, the measured values of the heart rate are preferably determined in the second segment. The values of the heart rate necessary to determine the overall fitness are measured before the subject begins to perspire. The procedure used by the invention can thus be applied in sports shops and informational events.
The determination of the maximum heart rate and/or the initial heart rate and/or increase characteristic of the heart rate results from the measured values of the heart rate by means of mathematical formulas. A computer can be used for this purpose. The procedure according to the invention is distinguished by low cost in terms of hardware and time. Moreover the test subject must undergo merely a brief physical workout. Toggle-running, squatting jumps, bicycling on an ergometer, running on a treadmill or using a stair-climber or some other ergometer, for example, are suitable for this. Due to the brief duration of typically under 60 seconds, the workout is so short that the subject is not physically exhausted from it.
Since the determination of the maximum heart rate comes about by using a physical stress test of a subject, the procedure delivers accurate values applicable to the subject.
Endurance capacity and other relevant quantities, for example, a recommendation for a body workout of the subject, can be calculated based on the maximum heart rate and/or the initial heart rate and/or the increase characteristic. A multivariant model calculation is suitable for this, for example. By means of mathematical-statistical methods, determining factors can be filtered out from a set of possibilities which indicate a significant predicative potential for a desired target quantity. An example of this type of procedure is Stepwise Multiple Regression. The procedure according to the invention enables, for example, the determination of performance at the anaerobic threshold with great accuracy. Other physiological factors of a test subject can be considered for targeting exact and reproducible values for endurance capacity, for example, age, gender, body size, weight, body fat, or abdominal or femoral girth. By considering this anamnetical information, the accuracy of endurance capacity derived from the measured values can be increased.
Along with the determination of endurance capacity, additional information for a workout recommendation for a test subject can be ascertained with the procedure according to the invention. For example it can be determined how high the heart rate should climb for an optimal endurance workout. Moreover a recommendation can be made for performance during a body workout. In a running workout, for example, the speed is entered at which the test subject should be moving forward. Furthermore the effect of an endurance workout can be determined from the relationship between performance and maximum heart rate. For this, the performance during physical stress must be determined in addition to the heart rate.
In an advantageous embodiment of the invention, an ongoing calculative plausibility test can occur to improve the result. On the basis of this plausibility test the physical stress for example can be terminated at an earlier point in time or even prolonged to a certain duration. This is the case, for example, when the determination of the parameters of the mathematical function is concluded after a short time, or when the measurement must be repeated for reasons of quality. The test subject can be informed about this with an optical indicator.
In another advantageous embodiment of the procedure according to the invention, the performance of the test subject is additionally determined during physical stress. With physical stress in the form of a toggle-run or squatting jumps, the performance can be determined, for example, by means of a measuring plate for measuring ground reaction forces. Performance is calculated from the frequency of paces and from the force exerted onto the measuring plate. If the test subject undergoes physical stress on an ergometer, the performance can be determined by means of detectors integrated into the ergometer for repetition rates and/or force. By noting maximum heart rate in relationship to associated performance, endurance capacity can be determined with better quality and accuracy. Moreover the establishment of other relevant quantities is possible. Among these, for example, is the heart rate of the test subject for an optimal endurance workout.
In another advantageous embodiment of the procedure according to the invention, the performance is monitored during the time period and held constant within pre-determined limits. Physical stress with constant performance during the measurement of the heart rate has the advantage that the maximum heart rate can be determined with great accuracy.
In another advantageous embodiment of the procedure according to the invention, the test subject is informed about adherence to and/or deviation from constant performance. During the physical stress he is thereby motivated and maintained to move with constant performance.
In another advantageous embodiment of the procedure according to the invention, endurance capacity is determined from the maximum heart rate and/or the output heart rate and/or the increase characteristic of the heart rate. Thus the performance of the test subject can be considered during physical stress. A multivariant model calculation and/or a multifactorial forecast model is suitable to determine endurance capacity.
In another advantageous embodiment of the procedure according to the invention, the parameters of the function are determined at every heartbeat detected in the test subject. This enables an especially rapid calculation of the parameters.
In another advantageous embodiment of the procedure according to the invention, the measurement of the heart rate is ended, when the parameters from at least two successive heartbeats differentiate by less than a pre-determined value. Furthermore the measurement of the heart rate can be continued under physical stress as long as the slope of the associated heart rate-time function continues to climb. It can, for example, be ended as soon as the slope falls.
In another advantageous embodiment of the procedure according to the invention, the qualitative temporal progression of the heart rate is determined as a mathematical function of the temporal progression of multiple test subjects under physical stress.
In another advantageous embodiment of the procedure according to the invention, the predominant portion of muscular mass of the test subject is put under dynamic and constant strain during physical stress. For this purpose the subject is subjected to physical stress in which the muscles of the arms, legs and upper torso are exerted. For example, in toggle-running additional weights can be carried in the hands and moved. In physical stress of the entire muscular mass the need for metabolizing oxygen is high, which results in a very accurate result for the maximum heart rate.
The apparatus according to the invention with the features of claim 12 are distinguished by being equipped with an installation to measure the heart rate of the test subject with a storage device to record a mathematical function for the temporal progression of the heart rate under physical stress and with a calculating device to calculate the parameters of the mathematical function from the measured values of the heart rate and to numerically determine the maximum heart rate and/or the initial heart rate without physical stress and/or the increase characteristic of the heart rate from the function provided with the calculated parameters. A computer, for example, is suitable for this.
In another advantageous embodiment of the apparatus according to the invention, this is equipped with a device to execute a physical movement with cardiopulmonary strain of a test subject. This can involve, for example, a bicycle ergometer, a rowing machine ergometer, a canoe ergometer, a handbike ergometer, a hand crank ergometer or a treadmill.
In another advantageous embodiment of the apparatus according to the invention, this is equipped with a device to determine performance generated by movement.
In another advantageous embodiment of the apparatus according to the invention, this is equipped with a plate to measure ground reaction forces.
Other advantages and advantageous embodiments of the invention can be found in the following description, the drawings and the claims.
The procedural steps of the invention are schematically represented in the Figures, which show the following:
In the procedure schematically depicted in
In
All features of the invention can be essential to the invention both individually and in any combination with each other.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2009 015 273 | Apr 2009 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/DE2010/000371 | 3/31/2010 | WO | 00 | 10/20/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/112010 | 10/7/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3742937 | Manuel et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3802698 | Burian et al. | Apr 1974 | A |
3838684 | Manuel et al. | Oct 1974 | A |
3978849 | Geneen | Sep 1976 | A |
4027663 | Fischler et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4038976 | Hardy et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4120294 | Wolfe | Oct 1978 | A |
4120296 | Prinz | Oct 1978 | A |
4221223 | Linden | Sep 1980 | A |
4248244 | Charnitski et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4252128 | Kane | Feb 1981 | A |
4364556 | Otte | Dec 1982 | A |
4436096 | Dyck et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
4647217 | Havel | Mar 1987 | A |
4653498 | New, Jr. et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4776323 | Spector | Oct 1988 | A |
4788983 | Brink et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4938228 | Righter et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5158093 | Shvartz et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5314389 | Dotan | May 1994 | A |
5686938 | Batkhan | Nov 1997 | A |
5697791 | Nashner et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5735799 | Baba et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5769755 | Henry et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5857939 | Kaufman | Jan 1999 | A |
5891042 | Sham et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5976083 | Richardson et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6002982 | Fry | Dec 1999 | A |
6010430 | Mankovtiz | Jan 2000 | A |
6013007 | Root et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6050924 | Shea | Apr 2000 | A |
6080110 | Thorgersen | Jun 2000 | A |
6080111 | Pao-Lang | Jun 2000 | A |
6104947 | Heikkila et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6133722 | Havel | Oct 2000 | A |
6135951 | Richardson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6148262 | Fry | Nov 2000 | A |
6163718 | Fabrizio | Dec 2000 | A |
6230047 | McHugh | May 2001 | B1 |
6244988 | Delman | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251048 | Kaufman | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6345197 | Fabrizio | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6394960 | Shinogi et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6463385 | Fry | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6572636 | Hagen et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6582342 | Kaufman | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6585622 | Shum et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6607493 | Song | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6716139 | Hosseinzadeh-Dolkhani et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6734837 | Havel | May 2004 | B1 |
6736759 | Stubbs et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6745069 | Nissila et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6749432 | French et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6753882 | Nakazawa et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6758816 | Tsubata et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6798378 | Walters | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6823036 | Chen | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6832109 | Nissila | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6837827 | Lee et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6853955 | Burrell et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6882955 | Ohlenbusch et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
7057551 | Vogt | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7062225 | White | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7076291 | Pulkkinen et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7081809 | Mix et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7085678 | Burrell et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7097588 | Watterson et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7192387 | Mendel | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7192402 | Amano et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7220220 | Stubbs et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7229385 | Freeman et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7251454 | White | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7254516 | Case, Jr. et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7264554 | Bentley | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7292867 | Werner et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7383081 | Butt et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7398151 | Burrell et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7480512 | Graham et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7518054 | McKinney et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7519327 | White | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7603255 | Case, Jr. et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7648463 | Elhag et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7670263 | Ellis et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7689283 | Schecter | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7758469 | Dyer et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7766794 | Oliver et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7771320 | Riley et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7909737 | Ellis et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7927253 | Vincent et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8001472 | Gilley et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8033959 | Oleson et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8052580 | Saalasti et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8068858 | Werner et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8103517 | Hinnebusch | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8105208 | Oleson et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8121785 | Swisher et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8360936 | DiBenedetto et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8529407 | Nurmela et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
20010003542 | Kita | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20020055419 | Hinnebusch | May 2002 | A1 |
20020068873 | Nissila | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020156386 | Dardik | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020198463 | Dardik et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030028116 | Bimbaum | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030069108 | Kaiserman et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030171189 | Kaufman | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030224337 | Shum et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040046692 | Robson et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040102931 | Ellis et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040116784 | Gavish | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040171956 | Babashan | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199056 | Husemann et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050049113 | Yuch et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050124463 | Yeo et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050181347 | Barnes et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050195094 | White | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050197063 | White | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050256416 | Chen | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050266961 | Shum et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060136173 | Case, Jr. et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060169125 | Ashkenazi et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060189360 | White | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060253210 | Rosenberg | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070006489 | Case, Jr. et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070011919 | Case, Jr. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070021269 | Shum | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070033069 | Rao et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070159926 | Prstojevich et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070232455 | Hanoun | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070260421 | Berner, Jr. et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070287596 | Case et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080002528 | Andren et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080004510 | Tanzawa et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080009275 | Werner et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033311 | Sledge | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080051993 | Graham et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080058971 | Graham et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080059064 | Werner et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065319 | Graham et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080096726 | Riley et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080101161 | Imai et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080103689 | Graham et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080171636 | Usui et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080200310 | Tagliabue | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080319661 | Werner et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090047645 | Dibenedetto et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090048044 | Oleson et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090048070 | Vincent et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090233769 | Pryor | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090233770 | Vincent et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090233771 | Quatrochi et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100056341 | Ellis et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100075806 | Montgomery | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100292050 | DiBenedetto et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100292599 | Oleson et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100292600 | Dibenedetto et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20120244995 | Dibenedetto et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20140249661 | Dibenedetto et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
407824 | Nov 2000 | AT |
1448876 | Oct 2003 | CN |
3920526 | Jan 1991 | DE |
601 29 972 | May 2008 | DE |
10 2007 025 664 | Jan 2009 | DE |
1195135 | Apr 2002 | EP |
2025369 | Feb 2009 | EP |
2187554 | Sep 1987 | GB |
H11-118953 | Apr 1999 | JP |
2001-235560 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2002-369709 | Dec 2002 | JP |
3094882 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2009-050699 | Mar 2009 | JP |
0040151 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO-02067449 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO-2006065679 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO-2008101168 | Aug 2008 | WO |
WO-2009033034 | Mar 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
German Patent Office, Counterpart Patent Application DE 10 2009 015 273.3, Search Report—issued Dec. 8, 2009. |
Agnes Wittmann-Regis, International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Parent PCT Application: PCT/DE2010/000371, issued Nov. 1, 2011, WIPO—Geneva, Switzerland. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120029370 A1 | Feb 2012 | US |