Method and apparatus to estimate relative base station and subscriber terminal locations and using it to increase frequency reuse

Abstract

Method for estimating position information of base stations as well as terminals for three dimensional centralized real-time spectrum management to achieve high spectral efficiency. In one aspect of the invention, the method comprises i) understanding the position information of plurality of base stations, wherein the plurality of terminals and the base stations form a wireless network, ii) determining, at the central controller, position of a terminal via plurality of communication wirelessly between the base stations and a terminal and between the base station and the central controller, iii) applying network wide real time knowledge at the central controller to electronically steerable antennas to use a resource in a different direction then where it is used by other base stations to achieve frequency reuse of one.

Description

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In this invention, a method is proposed to find relative location of fixed base stations in the network; only distance information between some subscriber terminals and base stations are known if it is within the range. One part of the embodiment proposes a method to localize base stations. Another embodiment of this invention proposes a method to locate terminals along with base stations. Final embodiment of this invention proposes a method in an OFDMA/TDMA network in which there is a single channel which is used by all base stations. Method achieves frequency reuse close to 1 by using a resource in a direction that does not conflict with others by the help of electronically steerable antennas and position information.

The method and system proposed in this invention can be generalized to three dimensional space in which base stations and terminals are placed in 3-D space.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

The objective of the present invention will be more apparent from the following detailed drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 illustrates the network diagram where there are mobile stations, base stations a central controller connected to IP backbone.

FIG. 2 depicts a scanning procedure where each mobile station range with a BS and estimate the distance from the ranging parameters.

FIG. 3 shows the diagram of the method.

FIG. 4 shows the BS locationing with full distance information from MS.

FIG. 5 illustrates a network deployment with three base stations and 19 terminals.

FIG. 6 illustrates a build-up mechanism to construct a map from partial information.

FIG. 7 illustrates the mechanism to locate the mobile stations.

FIG. 8 illustrates the shadow point if there are only two distance estimates.

FIG. 9 illustrates the coordination of the central controller to provide location based scheduling with steerable antennas to increase the frequency reuse.

INTRODUCTION TO CERTAIN INVENTIVE PARTS OF INVENTION

We consider a wireless network where there are plurality of terminals (Ts) and plurality of base stations (BSs) and central controller as seen in FIG. 1. Terminals can be mobile or fixed but base stations are fixed. We also consider a central controller that can do command control to BSs. A terminal in order to associate with a BS can scan multiple BSs at a given time without initiating an association in a typical network shown below.

A T first scans for the BS in the network entry procedure. In the scanning procedure the T can estimate its distance to a BS. As a result, after the network entry procedure a T has a set of distance estimates for the BSs that are in the vicinity of its range. Distance estimates can be done in various ways including RSSI based estimation, time of flight based estimation. FIG. 2 illustrates the network for scanning. This scanning report is sent to the central controller.

Based on the collected measurements, the central controller can construct the matrix (C) in Table I. Useful information in C is D matrix. One can see that there is no mechanism to estimate the distances between BSs and the distances between Ts and some distance estimates are censored between Ts and BSs because of the range limitations.

TABLE I
Connectivity Matrix

Methodology for the Invention

For simplicity, we describe two-dimensional localization. However, our algorithm extends straightforwardly to three dimensions. We define a cluster as a set of four or more BSs, and a set of Ts such each Ts is connected to at least two of these BSs. A Ts is connected to a BS when it is in its communication range.

The algorithm can be broken down into three main phases. The first phase localizes the elements of clusters, BSs and Ts, into a local coordinate system. The second phase finds the relative positions among clusters and computes coordinate transformations between each cluster's local coordinate systems and generates a unique global coordinate system. The third phase refines the localization of the clusters using the periodical updates sent by the Ts. An example is depicted in FIG. 3.

The three phases of the algorithm are as follows:

Phase I. Cluster Localization: A BS becomes the origin of the local coordinate system of a cluster and the algorithm estimates the relative location of the neighboring BSs which can be unambiguously localized. We call this process cluster localization. For each cluster, we identify the sets of possible positions of the BSs given the distance estimates reported by the Ts. The Ts and BSs's positions are jointly estimated. The figure below exemplifies the cluster localization for three base stations and five terminals.

Phase II. Cluster Transformation. The algorithm finds the set of BSs in common between two clusters. In the next step, the remaining BSs belonging to the two clusters are localized relative to the known positions using trilateration. Finally, the algorithm computes transformations between the local coordinate systems of neighboring clusters.

Phase III. Cluster Optimization. Refine the position estimates for each cluster using the periodical updates sent by Ts. This phase reduces and any accumulated error that results from the incremental approach used in the second phase.

Cluster Localization

The goal of cluster localization is to compute the position of a cluster of BSs and Ts in a local coordinate system up to a global rotation and possible reflection. The algorithm provides that the relative positions of the nodes in a cluster are unique up to a global rotation, translation, and reflection. Using this property any two clusters sharing three BSs form a larger cluster that is also globally rigid. By induction, any number of clusters chained in this manner forms a globally rigid graph.

The algorithm for Phase I, cluster localization, is as follows:

1. The central controller identifies a cluster of nc (nc>4) BSs. Given D, all the distance estimates dij involving to BSs in the cluster are selected. Let mc (<m) be the number of Ts connected to the mc BSs. This corresponds to performing rows and columns operations on D in order to find all the submatrices Dc of dimension mc×nc whose elements are not all different form zero. For simplicity, Ts with only one connectivity are neglected.

2. We define a relative coordinate system for the cluster, where BS1 is at the origin and MS1 is arbitrarily placed at location (Dc11,0).

3. Localizing BSs in clusters: the relative positions of the BSs in each cluster are estimated using uniquely the distance estimates in Dc. Algorithm 1 accomplishes this task. We define estMS_j as the set of possible locations for MS_j, j=1, 2, . . . , mc that are consistent with Dc. Similarly, define estBS_i as the set of possible locations for BS_i, i=1, 2, . . . , nc that are consistent with Dc. Algorithm 1 proceeds by progressively excluding from these sets points that are not consistent with the matrix Dc.

ALGORITHM 1
Localization within a cluster
set estBS 1=[0,0] and estMS 1=[Dc11,0];
for all MSj, j=2, ...mc
If Dcj0 not ‘full’
estMSj = circle([0,0], Dc j0) j=2,...,mc
estBSi = circle([Dc 11,0],Dc1i) i=2,...,nc
for all BSi
delete ( x,y) in estBSi inside circle([0,0], mindistBS )
for all MSj such that Dc j1 and Dcji not ‘null’
delete ( x,y) in estBSi outside circle([0,0], Dc j1+Dcji)
while localization iss complete
for all BS j
for all MS i
delete points in estBSj and estMSi not consistent with Dc

When the connectivity is high enough, the relative positions of the BSs are unique up to a global rotation, translation and reflection.

FIG. 4 shows an example of cluster with four BSs and twenty MSs. The dotted lines show the connections between BSs and MSs. FIG. 5 shows the output of Algorithm 1 when applied to this cluster. For simplicity, the relative location of the BSs are rotated and translated such that the algorithm's output can be compared with the original network.

Cluster Transformation

In Phase II, the algorithm localizes the relative positions among clusters by chaining together clusters as seen in FIG. 6. Whenever two clusters have three nodes in common, it is possible to localize the clusters relative to each other. If the first cluster is fully localized, we can localize the second cluster by trilaterating from the three known positions. The global network can be thought as a graph of clusters, and localization amounts to trilaterating overlapping graphs. This operation can be performed in linear-time.

Cluster Optimization

Distance updates periodically sent by Ts can be used to improve the localization performance of the previous two phases. As time goes on, the distance estimates for each graph increase. The central controller can store all the updates in a database, and Phase I and Phase II can be periodically re-computed with the updated information. Since the base station locations are fixed the computed output shall be fed as an input to do fine tuning.

Terminal Localization

Once the base station locations are fixed, then terminal's position can be found by triangulation. Terminals that have at least three estimates have enough information to find the location. FIG. 7 shows the examples of triangulation.

However, for terminal 2 in FIG. 7, there could be a shadow point as seen in FIG. 8. Location A and B can not be differentiated by distance estimates but wireless signal conditions in a given area can be used to differentiate those two locations, also possibility of having those shadow points diminishes with the dense deployment of base stations. Mobility pattern of the terminal also brings side information to identify its location.

Frequency Reuse with Steerable Antenna Along with Locationing

In OFDMA/TDMA network, interference region between base stations can be avoidable by defining non-overlapping regions inside the given resource. A resource is considered as a collection of slots which are mapped into frequency and symbol axis. Non-overlapping regions can be constructed in the central controller via global knowledge of the topology to be assigned to different base stations which are sharing a terminal which is in the interference region of theirs. In this way, same resource can be used across the network by all base stations but they do use or blank out some regions according to the occupancy in their interference regions. In this way frequency reuse is close to unity.

When an electronically steerable antenna is available along with the locationing information of each terminal, frequency reuse of unity is achieved via single channel across network by directing non-overlapping resources to different terminals. If there is a conflicting node which is in the vicinity of BS1 and BS2. If BS1 uses a resource for that conflicting node, BS2 is allowed to use that resource only in a location different than the location of that conflicting node consequently which guarantees no interference with BS1's transmission. As a result, all resources are put to use but they are used with respect to geographical location of terminals.

An example is shown in FIG. 9 where there are two base stations; Base station 1 assigns resource R1 to terminal 1 and base station 2 uses R1 in different direction which is guaranteed to be

The description presented above only includes some but not all embodiments of the invention. Related other ways of managing three dimensional spectrum management to achieve high spectral efficiency may be devised without departing from the original scope of this invention, and are thus include by the present invention.

Claims

1. A method for finding locations of base stations in a wireless network comprising the steps of providing a central controller connecting to a wireless network, at least three base stations, and a plurality of terminal,scanning said base stations by said terminals by ways of transmitting digital signals from said terminals to said base stations,estimating by distances between said base stations and said terminals by said base stations,transmitting said distance information from said base stations to said central controller,storing and processing said distance information by said central controller,determining locations of base stations by said controller.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the step of determining locations of said base stations by said controller include the steps of cluster localizing,clustering transforming,cluster optimizing.

3. The method of claim 2, wherein the step of cluster localizing include the steps of selecting said base station as an origin of a local coordinate, andestimating possible positions of said base stations based on distance estimates reported by said terminals.

4. The method of claim 2, further comprising a step of using a smart scheduling at said base stations to increase frequency reuse.

5. The method of claim 2, further comprising a step of implementing a scheduler of said base station with an electronically steerable antenna coordinated by said central controller, including steps ofscheduling resource with respect to terminals bandwidth, andinforming other base stations not to schedule any resource in a contending direction.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein said step of using said smart scheduling is for OFDMA/TDMA/FDMA type of physical layer, whereby said base stations can be synchronized to transmit and receive frames in the same time and same frequency, whereby said base station is aware of said scheduling in a neighboring base station in a way to reduce interference.

7. Apparatus for wireless estimating a relative position of a base station and a terminal in a wireless network, comprising: a central controller;a plurality of terminal;at least three base stations, said central controller in communication with each other using an OFDMA protocol;said terminals includingmeans transmitting digital signals to said base stations using timing signals or power dissipation,means for transmitting distance information to said central controller;said controller includingmeans for storing and processing distance information and means for coordinating a scheduler to increase the frequency of reuse by said base station and said terminals with electronically steerable antenna.