The present invention relates generally to imaging techniques used in medicine, and more particularly to medical ultrasound, and still more particularly to an apparatus for producing ultrasonic images using multiple apertures.
In conventional ultrasonic imaging, a focused beam of ultrasound energy is transmitted into body tissues to be examined and the returned echoes are detected and plotted to form an image. In echocardiography the beam is usually stepped in increments of angle from a center probe position, and the echoes are plotted along lines representing the paths of the transmitted beams. In abdominal ultrasonography the beam is usually stepped laterally, generating parallel beam paths, and the returned echoes are plotted along parallel lines representing these paths. The following description will relate to the angular scanning technique for echocardiography (commonly referred to as a sector scan). However, the same concept with modifications can be implemented in abdominal scanners.
The basic principles of conventional ultrasonic imaging are well described in the first chapter of Echocardiography, by Harvey Feigenbaum (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 5th ed., Philadelphia, 1993). These will not be repeated here except as necessary to illustrate the differences between the conventional techniques and the present invention.
It is well known that the average velocity v of ultrasound in human tissue is about 1540 m/sec, the range in soft tissue being 1440 to 1670 m/sec (see, for example, P. N. T. Wells, Biomedical Ultrasonics, Academic Press, London, New York, San Francisco, 1977). Therefore, the depth of an impedance discontinuity generating an echo can be estimated as the round-trip time for the echo multiplied by v/2, and the amplitude is plotted at that depth along a line representing the path of the beam. After this has been done for all echoes along all beam paths, an image is formed, such as the image 10 shown in
In order to insonify the body tissues, a beam formed either by a phased array or a shaped transducer is scanned over the tissues to be examined. Traditionally, the same transducer or array is used to detect the returning echoes. This design configuration lies at the heart of one of the most significant limitations in the use of ultrasonic imaging for medical purposes; namely, poor lateral resolution. Theoretically the lateral resolution could be improved by increasing the aperture of the ultrasonic probe, but the practical problems involved with aperture size increase have kept apertures small and lateral resolution large. Unquestionably, ultrasonic imaging has been very useful even with this limitation, but it could be more effective with better resolution.
In the practice of cardiology, for example, the limitation on single aperture size is dictated by the space between the ribs (the intercostal spaces). For scanners intended for abdominal and other use, the limitation on aperture size is not so obvious, but it is a serious limitation nevertheless. The problem is that it is difficult to keep the elements of a large aperture array in phase because the speed of ultrasound transmission varies with the type of tissue between the probe and the area of interest. According to the book by Wells (cited above), the speed varies up to plus or minus 10% within the soft tissues. When the aperture is kept small, the intervening tissue is, to a first order of approximation, all the same and any variation is ignored. When the size of the aperture is increased to improve the lateral resolution, the additional elements of a phased array may be out of phase and may actually degrade the image rather than improving it. The instant disclosure teaches methods to maintain all of the information from an extended phased array “in phase” and thus to achieve sought-after improved lateral resolution.
In the case of cardiology, it has long been thought that extending the phased array into a second or third intercostal space would improve the lateral resolution, but this idea has met with two problems. First, elements over the ribs have to be eliminated, leaving a sparsely filled array. New theory is necessary to steer the beam emanating from such an array. Second, the tissue speed variation described above, but not adequately addressed until this time, needs to be compensated. The same solution taught in this disclosure is equally applicable for multi-aperture cardiac scanning, or for extended sparsely populated apertures for scans on other parts of the body.
The present invention solves both the problem of using more than one intercostal space and the problem of accommodating unknown phase delays from using elements spread over a large sparse aperture. The solution involves separating the insonifying probe from the imaging elements. The separation can be a physical separation or simply a separation in concept wherein some of the elements of the array can be shared for the two functions.
A single omni-directional receive element (such as a receive transducer) can gather all of the information necessary to reproduce a two-dimensional section of the body. Each time a pulse of ultrasound energy is transmitted along a particular path, the signal received by the omnidirectional probe can be recorded into a line of memory. The terms “omni-directional probe,” “omni probe” and/or “omni,” are used synonymously herein to mean an omnidirectional probe. When this is done for all of the lines in a sector scan, the memory can be used to reconstruct the image. This can be accomplished in the same time as data is being collected for the next frame.
There are numerous advantages to this approach, and these comprise the objects and advantages of the present invention. They include, among others:
The dominance of specular reflections so prominent in reconstructing images by returns to the main probe is greatly attenuated.
More than one omnidirectional probe can be used. Each one can be used to reconstruct an entire sector image but with different point spread functions. These can be combined to produce an image with a sharper point spread function.
Compensations can be made for different delays in different paths through the tissue.
Many more scan lines can be reconstructed than the number of pulses generated by the main probe. This overcomes the traditional limit of the number of scan lines by the speed of ultrasound in tissue, tissue depth of interest, and the time allowed between frames, which is typically 1/30 second.
Artificial scan lines can be considered as overlapping, and each pixel on an output image can be imaged from information from more than one omni line of data. Therefore the output pixel can be averaged from multiple data, thus improving the signal-to-noise ratio.
Omnidirectional probes can be placed in multiple intercostal spaces, the suprasternal notch, the substernal window, multiple apertures along the abdomen and other parts of the body, and even on the end of a catheter. An advantage in using omnidirectional probes for catheter placement is that no steering is required of the probe.
Probes can be placed either on the image plane, off of it, or any combination. When placed away from the image plane, omni probe information can be used to narrow the thickness of the sector scanned.
There has thus been broadly outlined the more important features of the invention in order that the detailed description that follows may be better understood, and in order that the present contribution to the art may be better appreciated. Additional objects, advantages and novel features of the invention will be set forth in part in the description as follows, and in part will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the following. Furthermore, such objects, advantages and features may be learned by practice of the invention, or may be realized and attained by means of the instrumentalities and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims.
Still other objects and advantages of the present invention will become readily apparent to those skilled in this art from the following detailed description, which shows and describes only the preferred embodiments of the invention, simply by way of illustration of the best mode now contemplated of carrying out the invention. As will be realized, the invention is capable of modification in various obvious respects without departing from the invention. Accordingly, the drawings and description of the preferred embodiment are to be regarded as illustrative in nature, and not as restrictive.
A key element of the present invention is that returned echoes in ultrasonography can be detected by a separate relatively non-directional receive transducer located away from the insonifying probe (transmit transducer), and the non-directional receive transducer can be placed in a different acoustic window from the insonifying probe. This probe will be called an omni-directional probe because it can be designed to be sensitive to a wide field of view.
If the echoes detected at the omni probe are stored separately for every pulse from the insonifying transducer, it is surprising to note that the entire two-dimensional image can be formed from the information received by the one omni. Additional copies of the image can be formed by additional omni-directional probes collecting data from the same set of insonifying pulses.
A large amount of straightforward computation is required to plot the amplitude of echoes received from the omni. Referring now to
This procedure will produce a sector scan image similar to that using the conventional technique except that the point spread function will be rotated.
Specular reflection is reduced using the omni probe compared to using the main probe for both insonification and detection. This is because all parts of a surface normal to the main beam are insonified with the same phase. When the phase is such that maximum echo is returned, all the echoes add to produce a specular echo. When the signals are normalized to accommodate the dynamic response of a particular display device, non-specular echoes will tend to drop out.
In contrast to this, and referring now to
An algorithm to plot this data on a rectangular grid is: (a) for each point on the x,y grid, convert x,y to depth and angle; (b) then find closest angle k scanned by the insonifying beam; (c) if it is sufficiently close, then convert x,y to distance to the omni; (d) compute time t=(distance to insonifying beam+distance to omni)/v; and (e) plot amplitude recorded by the omni for the k scan at x,y.
However, more information is available and should be used. It is possible to use the same technique to plot additional scan lines which were not explicitly insonified by the insonifying probe. Because of the inherently wide beam width of medical ultrasonic probes, much tissue between intentional scan lines is also insonified and returns echoes. Making use of this information is particularly important when capturing motion (especially in echocardiography) because the number of pulses that can be generated is strictly limited by the speed of ultrasound in tissue and the scan repetition rate desired.
The reconstructed image will get better as the angle between the main beam and the omni gets larger. However it is not necessary to focus a narrow beam on every element of tissue to be imaged as is true if the data is not stored and then processed before display. The lateral resolution can be reconstructed using a Wiener filter to be much better than the beam width if the noise spectrum is low enough. In one simulation of 2 circles of diameter 2.2 mm and 4.0 mm, both imaged well enough that the center was clear even though the beam width was 4.4 mm tapered from 1 to 0 by a cosine function. The Wiener filter is described in the next section.
There are four main sources of noise in ultrasonic imaging: (1) blur due to array size not wide enough; (2) shot noise; (3) reverberation from big interfaces; and (4) speckle.
Multiple probes give independent measures of shot noise, but using closely spaced elements in the main probe (if it is a phased array) will not give independent noise for the other three sources. Adding one or more omni probes will change the look angle, which will thereby change the speckle pattern and the reverberation pattern. These can be averaged out to lower the noise power spectrum. The Wiener filter can then be employed to cancel the blur.
Another way to eliminate speckle is to obtain a good sample of it for estimates of the noise spectrum to then be used in the Wiener filter.
De-blurring and de-noising by these techniques using only an external omni probe or probes will make it possible to visualize small and moving objects such as the coronary arteries. In such a case medical personnel could assess the degree of opening in the lumen or patency of bypass grafts without resort to invasive catheterization techniques.
When combining more than one image such as one from the main probe and another from one or more omni probes for the purpose of averaging out the various sources of noise, it is necessary to compensate for the variation in ultrasound velocity through different paths. Experiments have shown that small unaccounted errors in path velocity will displace the reconstructed image in both horizontal and vertical positions. Cross correlation techniques should be used to find the displacement with one image taken as reference before addition or other combination of images.
Two possibilities exist with regard to the Wiener filter. In one, a Wiener filter can be used separately on each image and then combine them. Alternatively, one can first combine the images (yielding a more complex point spread function) and then employ Wiener filtering.
In order to perform the indicated computations, it is necessary to either measure or estimate the position (x0, y0, z0) of the omni relative to the main probe. Exact knowledge of these positions is not required because, as we have seen, the displacement of the image from the omni probe is also affected by the variation of the velocity of ultrasound in different types of tissue. For this reason it is necessary to use cross correlation or some other matching criterion to make a final correction of the position of the omni-generated image before combining with the reference image or images.
Determining the Position of the Omni Probe(s):
There are many ways to determine the position of the omni probe. Referring now to
Another method is to have no mechanical connection between the omni probe and the main probe (except wires for signals and power). Instead, the omni probe can transmit a signal using radio frequencies, light, or a different frequency ultrasound to triangulation receivers mounted on the main probe or a separate platform.
A third method again has no mechanical connection between the omni probe and main probe. For this method the omni probe (or probes) can be attached to the patient with tape, and the ultrasonographer can manipulate the main probe to find the best image without regard to positioning the omni probe(s). As indicated in
When the application requires the highest resolution compatible with capturing motion at a high frame rate, the four variables can be estimated over several frames of information. When the ultrasonographer has selected a good view angle, the frames can be combined at high rate holding x0, y0, z0 and D constant.
When the application requires the highest possible resolution, data can be captured (perhaps with EKG gating to capture separate images at systole and diastole) and the multi-dimensional search to optimize matching can be done more accurately although not in real time. Two advantages of this approach is that different values of D can be found for systole and diastole, and that different psf's can be used for deconvolution at different depths in the image.
Determining the Position of the Omni Probe(s) Using Correlation of the Scan Line Data Rather than Complete 2D Sectors:
A fourth method for determining the position of the omni probe(s) entails replacing the omni probe or probes with a “semi-omni probe” or probes. The reason for this is to increase the signal to noise ratio by restricting the sensitive region of the receive transducer to a plane rather than a hemisphere. Because of this restriction it is necessary to have a mechanical linkage to ensure that both the transmit and receive transducers are focused on the same plane.
Two probes could be placed in any two acoustic windows. In the case of echocardiography, one would likely be in the normal parasternal window which typically gives the clearest view of the whole heart. A second window available in most patients is the apical view. Another window usually available is the subcostal. The two probes could even be placed on either side of the sternum or in parasternal windows in two intercostal spaces.
One probe could be the standard phased array cardiac probe. The second (and third, etc.) would be used as receive only. Theoretically it could be omnidirectional, but that would necessarily provide lower signals and therefore low signal to noise ratios (S/N). A better alternative is to use a probe which is ground to be sensitive to a plane of scan but omnidirectional within that plane. A single piece of PZT would work well, but to minimize the amount of new design required it is also possible to use a second probe head similar to the main probe and then use individual elements or small groups combined to act as single elements. The design goal is to use as many elements as possible to maximize signal to noise ratio while using few enough to minimize angle sensitivity.
In this embodiment 600 (see
The procedure is to aim the main probe 620 at the target 630 (e.g., heart) and position the secondary probe 610 at a second window with maximum received signal strength. One possibility is that the main probe be positioned for a long axis view with the secondary probe over the apex of the heart. Some slight deviation of the long axis view may be necessary in order to maintain the secondary probe in its most sensitive spot.
The secondary probe would now be held on the patient with a mechanical housing which allows a fan or rocking motion. The disadvantage of having two probes in fixed positions on the body is that the plane of scan must include these two points. The only degree of freedom is the angle at which the scan plane enters the patient's body. For a conventional 2D examination this is a severe limitation, but if the goal is to gather three-dimensional information, this is not a limitation. The 3D information is obtained by rocking the main probe back and forth through a sufficient angle so that the entire heart is insonified. The secondary probe also rocks back and forth by virtue of the mechanical linage between the probes. The instantaneous angle of rocking must be monitored—perhaps by reference to a gyroscope mounted with the main probe. The rocking could be actuated by the hand motion of the ultrasound technician, or it could be motorized for a more-uniform angle rate. In an alternative preferred embodiment (for echocardiography), the main probe and an array of omni probes are placed in adjacent intercostal spaces using a mechanism as shown in
Computer software could be provided such that the 2D slices would fill a 3D volume of voxels. After adjacent voxels are filled through interpolation, 3D information can be displayed as projections or as slices through the volume at arbitrary orientations.
The need for and one important use of the 3D information is covered in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/532,013, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,105,239, also by the present inventor, and which application is incorporated in its entirety by reference herein.
Yet another variation on this theme is to have the secondary transducer mechanically linked to the primary so that each plane of scan contains the other transducer (as above), but allow rotation of the main probe about its own axis. In this case the secondary probe would be allowed to move on the patient's body (properly prepared with ultrasound gel). It would have many elements, and an attached computer would scan them all to find those elements which have the strongest return signal.
Estimating Relative Probe Positions from Reflected Signals:
For image reconstruction it is essential to know the position of the secondary probe (x, y) relative to the main probe. This has to be evaluated separately for each frame of data because of the motion of the patient, technician, and/or motorized angle actuator. Since the linkage will prevent any difference in position (z) perpendicular to the scan plane, only x and y need be assessed.
Note that any tilt of the main probe will change the reference axes so that x and particularly y will change too.
When a pulse is transmitted from the main probe it insonifies a sequence of tissues in the path of the beam. The returns from the tissues will be received by both the main probe and the secondary, digitized and stored in the computer. Echoes from relatively proximate tissues will be different for the two probes, but echoes from mid- to far range will be similar. It is possible to use cross correlation to find similar small patches in the two stored returns. They will be similar except for the time delay relative to the launching of the pulse from the main probe. The time delay will be related to the offsets x and y. Values for x and y cannot be determined from one set of time delays, but can be determined by solving a set of simultaneous equations from two detected similar returns. These could be different patches of the same pulse return or from returns from differently directed main pulses.
Referring now to
Similarly, t2ms=2 m2
t2ss=m2+sqrt((x2−x)2+(y2−y)2)
(t1ss−0.5t1m)=(x1−x)2+(y1−y)2
(t2ss−0.5t2ms)2=(x2−x)2+(y2−y)2 (1)
Since Xj, y15 x2, y2 and the times are known, one can solve the last two simultaneous equations for x and y. Similarly, if a z offset between the two probes is allowed, x, y, and z can be calculated by solving three simultaneous equations.
Many more measurements from packet pairs are available. One could make a measurement on several or every scan line (angle) as measured from the main probe. Then we would have many equations in 2 unknowns which can be used to make more-accurate estimations of the 2 unknowns. Since these are nonlinear equations, a search technique can be utilized. One way to accomplish this is to compute error squared over a grid of (x, y) points using the equation:
The minimum E2 will indicate the minimum squared error estimate of (x, y). The search should be conducted over the expected range of x and y to save time and to avoid spurious ambiguous minima.
When the z component of the relative position is not constrained to be zero, the comparable error squared equation is:
The minimum E2 will indicate the minimum squared error estimate of (x, y, z).
If the speed of sound on the return path to the secondary (omni) transducer is different from s due to different types of tissues being traversed, the values of x and y (and z if used) will be different from the geometric values. However, use of these values in the image reconstruction algorithm will automatically compensate for the different speeds.
Obviously, the probes that have been described for imaging the heart would work equally well for imaging abdominal organs and other parts of the body such as legs, arms, and neck. In fact, use of receive-only transducers in conjunction with a transmit/receive probe would work better for abdominal organs because the orientation of the probe set is not limited by the intercostal spaces formed by the ribs. Whereas the locations of the acoustic windows to the heart limit the orientation of the probe to only a few orientations and it is necessary to rock the probe to gather three dimensional data, the probes can be used on the abdomen in any orientation presently used. Therefore the probes can be used for real-time 2D scans to duplicate presently accepted procedures except with much higher lateral resolution. In fact, this application of the technology may be as important as the application to cardiology (which was our original motivation).
For abdominal scanning it is not necessary to have an elaborate spacing adjustment between the active transmit/receive elements and the receive-only elements. In fact they could all be mounted together in one rigid probe, either as a linear array or an array with known curvature. Some prior art wide linear arrays exist which insonify tissue by using a small subset of the total number of elements to transmit and receive a beam perpendicular to the array. Then another partially overlapping subset of elements is used to transmit and receive another line parallel to the first one, and so on until an entire scan is completed.
However, the same array could be partitioned into an active section plus one or more passive sections where all sections would be used for each pulse. The active section of elements would be used in transmit as a sector scanner sending out beams in a sequence of angular paths. On receive, all elements would be treated as independent relatively nondirectional receivers and their outputs would be combined to form a high resolution image by the methods taught in this patent. Cross-correlation image matching to account for the variations in ultrasound speeds could be done separately for each receive element or for groups of elements for which the speed corrections would be nearly the same.
The concept of mounting the active and receive-only elements on a rigid structure eliminates the necessity for articulating and instrumenting the spacing between elements thus making practical combined probes to be used for trans-esophageal (TEE), trans-vaginal, and trans-rectal imaging.
A final class of probes would involve putting a receive-only transducer or transducers on the end of a catheter to be inserted in an artery, vein, or urethra while a separated transmit transducer array is applied to the surface of the skin. The advantage of this approach is that the catheter could be positioned close to an organ of interest thereby reducing the total transit distance from the transmit transducer to the receive element and thus higher frequencies could be used for better resolution. The receive element(s) on the catheter would not have to be steered as it (they) would be relatively omnidirectional.
The Wiener Filter:
The Wiener filter itself is not new, but since it is important for the de-convolution step it will be described briefly here in the context of the present invention. The Wiener filter is the mean squared error optimal stationary linear filter for images degraded by additive noise and blurring. Wiener filters are usually applied in the frequency domain. Given a degraded image I(n.m.), one takes the discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) or the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) to obtain I(u,v). The true image spectrum is estimated by taking the product of I(u,v) with the Wiener filter G(u,v):
Ŝ=G(u,v)I(u,v)
The inverse DFT or FFT is then used to obtain the image estimate s(n,m) from its spectrum. The Wiener filter is defined in terms of the following spectra:
The Wiener filter is:
The ratio Ps/Pn can be interpreted as signal-to-noise ratio. At frequencies with high signal to noise ratio, the Wiener filter becomes H−1(u,v), the inverse filter for the psf. At frequencies for which the signal to noise ratio is low, the Wiener filter tends to 0 and blocks them out.
Ps(u,v)+Pn(u,v)=|I(u,v)|2. The right hand function is easy to compute from the Fourier transform of the observed data. Pn(u,v) is often assumed to be constant over (u,v). It is then subtracted from the total to yield Ps(u,v).
The psf can be measured by observing a wire phantom in a tank using the ultrasound instrument. The Fourier transform of the psf can then be stored for later use in the Wiener filter when examining patients.
Because the psf is not constant as a function of range, the Wiener filter will have to be applied separately for several range zones and the resulting images will have to be pieced together to form one image for display. A useful compromise might be to optimize the Wiener filter just for the range of the object of interest such as a coronary artery or valve. It will be necessary to store separate Wiener filters for each omni-directional probe and for the main probe when it is used as a receive transducer.
An alternative to the Wiener Filter for deconvolution is the least mean square (LMS) adaptive filter described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/532,013, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,105,239. LMS Filtering is used in the spatial domain rather than the frequency domain, and can be applied to the radial scan line data, the lateral data at each depth, or both together.
Image sharpening can be accomplished by the use of unsharp masking. Because aperture blur is much more pronounced in the lateral dimension perpendicular to the insonifying beam) than in the radial dimension, it is necessary to perform unsharp masking in only one dimension. When using a sector scanner, this masking should be performed before scan conversion. When using a linear phased array, the unsharp masking should be performed on each data set of constant range. Unsharp masking consists of intentionally blurring an image, subtracting the result from the original image, multiplying the difference by an arbitrary factor, and adding this to the original image. In one dimension this is the same as blurring a line of data, subtracting it from the original line, and adding a multiple of the difference to the original line.
Multiple Active Transducers—Two Alternative Approaches:
It is possible to use more than one active transducer placed at multiple acoustic windows in order to achieve the same goals of increased lateral resolution and noise suppression. A practical method of providing multiple omni probes is to use a second phased array head in a second acoustic window and then treating each element or group of elements of the second phased array as a separate omni. With this configuration of probes it would be possible to switch the functions of the two probe heads on alternate scans thereby generating images with different speckle patterns which can be averaged out.
Multiple phased array heads can also be used together so that both are active on the same scan. When two (or more) phased array transducers are placed in the same scan plane, they can be programmed with delays such that they act as a single array with a gap in the array of transducer elements. The advantages of having a gap in the array include a) achieving the lateral resolution of a wide aperture without the expense of filling in acoustic elements through the gap, and b) the gap in the probe or between probes can be fitted over ribs or the sternum. The first advantage applies equally to applications other than cardiac. The disadvantages of multiple active probes is that both the transmit and receive delays have to be recomputed for each new gap dimension and/or angular orientation of one probe relative to the others.
An active probe with a gap has been demonstrated to produce lateral resolution as good as the probe without the gap. This implies that larger gaps will achieve higher resolution since lateral resolution is determined primarily by the overall aperture. Referring now to
Having fully described several embodiments of the present invention, many other equivalents and alternative embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art. These and other equivalents and alternatives are intended to be included within the scope of the present invention.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/754,422, filed Jun. 29, 2015, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,420,994; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/157,257, filed Jan. 16, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,072,495; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/632,929, filed Oct. 1, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,684,936; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/215,966, filed Aug. 23, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,277,383; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/865,501, filed Oct. 1, 2007, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,007,439; which application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Applications No. 60/862,951, filed Oct. 25, 2006, and No. 60/940,261, filed May 25, 2007; all of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3174286 | Erickson | Mar 1965 | A |
3895381 | Kock | Jul 1975 | A |
3974692 | Hassler | Aug 1976 | A |
4055988 | Dutton | Nov 1977 | A |
4072922 | Taner et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4097835 | Green | Jun 1978 | A |
4105018 | Greenleaf et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4180792 | Lederman et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
4259733 | Taner et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4265126 | Papadofrangakis et al. | May 1981 | A |
4271842 | Specht et al. | Jun 1981 | A |
4325257 | Kino et al. | Apr 1982 | A |
4327738 | Green et al. | May 1982 | A |
4452084 | Taenzer | Jun 1984 | A |
4501279 | Seo | Feb 1985 | A |
4511998 | Kanda et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4539847 | Paap | Sep 1985 | A |
4566459 | Umemura et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4567768 | Satoh et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4604697 | Luthra et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4662222 | Johnson | May 1987 | A |
4669482 | Ophir | Jun 1987 | A |
4682497 | Sasaki | Jul 1987 | A |
4781199 | Hirama | Nov 1988 | A |
4817434 | Anderson | Apr 1989 | A |
4831601 | Breimesser et al. | May 1989 | A |
4893284 | Magrane | Jan 1990 | A |
4893628 | Angelsen | Jan 1990 | A |
5050588 | Grey et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5141738 | Rasor et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5161536 | Vilkomerson et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5197475 | Antich et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5226019 | Bahorich | Jul 1993 | A |
5230339 | Charlebois | Jul 1993 | A |
5269309 | Fort et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5278757 | Hoctor et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5293871 | Reinstein et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5299576 | Shiba | Apr 1994 | A |
5301674 | Erikson et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5305756 | Entrekin et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5339282 | Kuhn et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5340510 | Bowen | Aug 1994 | A |
5345426 | Lipschutz | Sep 1994 | A |
5349960 | Gondo | Sep 1994 | A |
5355888 | Kendall | Oct 1994 | A |
5381794 | Tei et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5398216 | Hall et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5442462 | Guissin | Aug 1995 | A |
5454372 | Banjanin et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5515853 | Smith et al. | May 1996 | A |
5515856 | Olstad et al. | May 1996 | A |
5522393 | Phillips | Jun 1996 | A |
5526815 | Granz et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5544659 | Banjanin | Aug 1996 | A |
5558092 | Unger | Sep 1996 | A |
5564423 | Mele et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568812 | Murashita et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5570691 | Wright et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5581517 | Gee et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5625149 | Gururaja et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5628320 | Teo | May 1997 | A |
5673697 | Bryan et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5675550 | Ekhaus | Oct 1997 | A |
5720291 | Schwartz | Feb 1998 | A |
5720708 | Lu et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5744898 | Smith et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5769079 | Hossack | Jun 1998 | A |
5784334 | Sena et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5785654 | Iinuma et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5795297 | Daigle | Aug 1998 | A |
5797845 | Barabash et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5798459 | Ohba et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5820561 | Olstad et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5838564 | Bahorich et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5850622 | Vassiliou et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5862100 | VerWest | Jan 1999 | A |
5870691 | Partyka et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5876342 | Chen et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891038 | Seyed-Bolorforosh et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5892732 | Gersztenkorn | Apr 1999 | A |
5919139 | Lin | Jul 1999 | A |
5920285 | Benjamin | Jul 1999 | A |
5930730 | Marfurt et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5940778 | Marfurt et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5951479 | Holm et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5964707 | Fenster et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5969661 | Benjamin | Oct 1999 | A |
5999836 | Nelson et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6007499 | Martin et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6013032 | Savord | Jan 2000 | A |
6014473 | Hossack et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6049509 | Sonneland et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6050943 | Slayton et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6056693 | Haider | May 2000 | A |
6058074 | Swan et al. | May 2000 | A |
6077224 | Lang et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6092026 | Bahorich et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6122538 | Sliwa, Jr. et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6123670 | Mo | Sep 2000 | A |
6129672 | Seward et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6135960 | Holmberg | Oct 2000 | A |
6138075 | Yost | Oct 2000 | A |
6148095 | Prause et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6162175 | Marian, Jr. et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6166384 | Dentinger et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6166853 | Sapia et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6193665 | Hall et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6196739 | Silverbrook | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6200266 | Shokrollahi et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210335 | Miller | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6213958 | Winder | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221019 | Kantorovich | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6231511 | Bae | May 2001 | B1 |
6238342 | Feleppa et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246901 | Benaron | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6251073 | Imran et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6264609 | Herrington et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266551 | Osadchy et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6278949 | Alam | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289230 | Chaiken et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6299580 | Asafusa | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304684 | Niczyporuk et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309356 | Ustuner et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324453 | Breed et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6345539 | Rawes et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6361500 | Masters | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6363033 | Cole et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6370480 | Gupta et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6374185 | Taner et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6394955 | Perlitz | May 2002 | B1 |
6423002 | Hossack | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6436046 | Napolitano et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449821 | Sudol et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6450965 | Williams et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6468216 | Powers et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6471650 | Powers et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6475150 | Haddad | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6480790 | Calvert et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487502 | Taner | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6499536 | Ellingsen | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6508768 | Hall et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6508770 | Cai | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6517484 | Wilk et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6526163 | Halmann et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6543272 | Vitek | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6547732 | Jago | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6551246 | Ustuner et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6565510 | Haider | May 2003 | B1 |
6585647 | Winder | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6604421 | Li | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6614560 | Silverbrook | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6620101 | Azzam et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6668654 | Dubois et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6672165 | Rather et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6681185 | Young et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6690816 | Aylward et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6692450 | Coleman | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6695778 | Golland et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6719693 | Richard | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6728567 | Rather et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6755787 | Hossack et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6790182 | Eck et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6837853 | Marian | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6843770 | Sumanaweera | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6847737 | Kouri et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6865140 | Thomenius et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6932767 | Landry et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7033320 | Von Behren et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7087023 | Daft et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7104956 | Christopher | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7221867 | Silverbrook | May 2007 | B2 |
7231072 | Yamano et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7269299 | Schroeder | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7283652 | Mendonca et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7285094 | Nohara et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7293462 | Lee et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7313053 | Wodnicki | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7366704 | Reading et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7402136 | Hossack et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7410469 | Talish et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7443765 | Thomenius et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7444875 | Wu et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7447535 | Lavi | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7448998 | Robinson | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7466848 | Metaxas et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7469096 | Silverbrook | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7474778 | Shinomura et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7497830 | Li | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7510529 | Chou et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7514851 | Wilser et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7549962 | Dreschel et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7574026 | Rasche et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7625343 | Cao et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7668583 | Fegert et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7682311 | Simopoulos et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7750311 | Daghighian | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7787680 | Ahn et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7822250 | Yao et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7862508 | Davies et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7914451 | Davies | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7919906 | Cerofolini | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7984637 | Ao et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8007439 | Specht | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8105239 | Specht | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8277383 | Specht | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8412307 | Willis et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8419642 | Sandrin et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8473239 | Specht et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8602993 | Specht et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8672846 | Napolitano et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8684936 | Specht | Apr 2014 | B2 |
9072495 | Specht | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9146313 | Specht et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9192355 | Specht et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9220478 | Smith et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9247926 | Smith et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9265484 | Brewer et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9282945 | Smith et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9339256 | Specht et al. | May 2016 | B2 |
9420994 | Specht | Aug 2016 | B2 |
20020035864 | Paltieli et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020087071 | Schmitz et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020138003 | Bukshpan | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020161299 | Prater et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030013962 | Bjaerum et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028111 | Vaezy et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040669 | Grass et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030228053 | Li et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040054283 | Corey et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040068184 | Trahey et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040100163 | Baumgartner et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040111028 | Abe et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122313 | Moore et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040122322 | Moore et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040138565 | Trucco | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040144176 | Yoden | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040236217 | Cerwin et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236223 | Barnes et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050004449 | Mitschke et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050053305 | Li et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050054910 | Tremblay et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050090743 | Kawashima et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050090745 | Steen | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050111846 | Steinbacher et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113689 | Gritzky | May 2005 | A1 |
20050113694 | Haugen et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050124883 | Hunt | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131300 | Bakircioglu et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147297 | McLaughlin et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050165312 | Knowles et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050203404 | Freiburger | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050215883 | Hundley et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050240125 | Makin et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050252295 | Fink et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050281447 | Moreau-Gobard et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288588 | Weber et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060062447 | Rinck et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074313 | Slayton et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060074315 | Liang et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060074320 | Yoo et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060079759 | Vaillant et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060079778 | Mo et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060079782 | Beach et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060094962 | Clark | May 2006 | A1 |
20060111634 | Wu | May 2006 | A1 |
20060122506 | Davies et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060173327 | Kim | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060262961 | Holsing et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060270934 | Savord et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070036414 | Georgescu et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070055155 | Owen et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070078345 | Mo et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070088213 | Poland | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070138157 | Dane et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070161898 | Hao et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167752 | Proulx et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070167824 | Lee et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070232914 | Chen et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070238985 | Smith et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080110261 | Randall et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114255 | Schwartz et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080125659 | Wilser et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080181479 | Yang et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183075 | Govari et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080188747 | Randall et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080188750 | Randall et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080194957 | Hoctor et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080194958 | Lee et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080208061 | Heimann | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080242996 | Hall et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080249408 | Palmeri et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255452 | Entrekin | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269604 | Boctor et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080269613 | Summers et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080275344 | Glide-Hurst et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080287787 | Sauer et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294045 | Ellington et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294050 | Shinomura et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080294052 | Wilser et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080306382 | Guracar et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080306386 | Baba et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319317 | Kamiyama et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090010459 | Garbini et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090012393 | Choi | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090016163 | Freeman et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090018445 | Schers et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090036780 | Abraham | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090043206 | Towfiq et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090069681 | Lundberg et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090069686 | Daft et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090182237 | Angelsen et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090208080 | Grau et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100121193 | Fukukita et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100168566 | Bercoff et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100168578 | Garson, Jr. et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100217124 | Cooley | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100256488 | Kim et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100262013 | Smith et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20120095347 | Adam et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120116226 | Specht | May 2012 | A1 |
20130144166 | Specht et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130253325 | Call et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130261463 | Chiang et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140043933 | Belevich et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140058266 | Call et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140073921 | Specht et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140269209 | Smith et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150045668 | Smith et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150080727 | Specht et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150374345 | Specht et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160095579 | Smith et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160135783 | Brewer et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160157833 | Smith et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160256134 | Specht et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170074982 | Smith et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170079621 | Specht et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1781460 | Jun 2006 | CN |
101116622 | Feb 2008 | CN |
101190134 | Jun 2008 | CN |
101453955 | Jun 2009 | CN |
1949856 | Jul 2008 | EP |
1757955 | Nov 2010 | EP |
1850743 | Dec 2012 | EP |
1594404 | Sep 2013 | EP |
2026280 | Oct 2013 | EP |
2851662 | Aug 2004 | FR |
S49-11189 | Jan 1974 | JP |
S54-44375 | Apr 1979 | JP |
S55-103839 | Aug 1980 | JP |
57-31848 | Feb 1982 | JP |
58-223059 | Dec 1983 | JP |
59-101143 | Jun 1984 | JP |
S59-174151 | Oct 1984 | JP |
S60-13109 | Jan 1985 | JP |
S60-68836 | Apr 1985 | JP |
2-501431 | May 1990 | JP |
03015455 | Jan 1991 | JP |
03126443 | May 1991 | JP |
04017842 | Jan 1992 | JP |
4-67856 | Mar 1992 | JP |
05-042138 | Feb 1993 | JP |
6-125908 | May 1994 | JP |
7-051266 | Feb 1995 | JP |
07204201 | Aug 1995 | JP |
08154930 | Jun 1996 | JP |
08-252253 | Oct 1996 | JP |
9-103429 | Apr 1997 | JP |
9-201361 | Aug 1997 | JP |
2777197 | May 1998 | JP |
10-216128 | Aug 1998 | JP |
11-089833 | Apr 1999 | JP |
11-239578 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2001-507794 | Jun 2001 | JP |
2001-245884 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2002-209894 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002-253548 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002-253549 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2004-167092 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004-215987 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2004-337457 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2004-351214 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2005152187 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005-523792 | Aug 2005 | JP |
2005-526539 | Sep 2005 | JP |
2006051356 | Feb 2006 | JP |
2006-61203 | Mar 2006 | JP |
2006-122657 | May 2006 | JP |
2006130313 | May 2006 | JP |
2007-325937 | Dec 2007 | JP |
2008-122209 | May 2008 | JP |
2008-513763 | May 2008 | JP |
2008132342 | Jun 2008 | JP |
2008522642 | Jul 2008 | JP |
2008-259541 | Oct 2008 | JP |
2008279274 | Nov 2008 | JP |
2010526626 | Aug 2010 | JP |
100715132 | Apr 2007 | KR |
WO9218054 | Oct 1992 | WO |
WO9800719 | Jan 1998 | WO |
WO0164109 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO02084594 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO2005009245 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO2006114735 | Nov 2006 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Belevich et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/400,826 entitled “Calibration of multiple aperture ultrasound probes,” filed Jan. 6, 2017. |
Davies et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/418,534 entitled “Ultrasound imaging with sparse array probes,” filed Jan. 27, 2017. |
Call et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/500,933 entitled “Network-based ultrasound imaging system,” filed Feb. 1, 2017. |
Call et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 15/495,591 entitled “Systems and methods for improving ultrasound image quality by applying weighting factors,” filed Apr. 24, 2017. |
Chen et al.; Maximum-likelihood source localization and unknown sensor location estimation for wideband signals in the near-field; IEEE Transactions On Signal Processing; 50(8); pp. 1843-1854; Aug. 2002. |
Chen et al.; Source localization and tracking of a wideband source using a randomly distributed beamforming sensor array; International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications; 16(3); pp. 259-272; Fall 2002. |
Cristianini et al.; An Introduction to Support Vector Machines; Cambridge University Press; pp. 93-111; Mar. 2000. |
Feigenbaum, Harvey, M.D.; Echocardiography; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Philadelphia; 5th Ed.; pp. 482, 484; Feb. 1994. |
Fernandez et al.; High resolution ultrasound beamforming using synthetic and adaptive imaging techniques; Proceedings IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging; Washington, D.C.; pp. 433-436; Jul. 7-10, 2002. |
Gazor et al.; Wideband multi-source beamforming with array location calibration and direction finding; Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing ICASSP-95; Detroit, MI; vol. 3 IEEE; pp. 1904-1907; May 9-12, 1995. |
Haykin, Simon; Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation (2nd Ed.); Prentice Hall; pp. 156-187; Jul. 16, 1998. |
Heikkila et al.; A four-step camera calibration procedure with implicit image correction; Proceedings IEEE Computer Scociety Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition; San Juan; pp. 1106-1112; Jun. 17-19, 1997. |
Hendee et al.; Medical Imaging Physics; Wiley-Liss, Inc. 4th Edition; Chap. 19-22; pp. 303-353; (year of pub. sufficiently earlier than effective US filed and any foreign priority date) © 2002. |
Hsu et al.; Real-time freehand 3D ultrasound calibration; CUED/F-INFENG/TR 565; Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom; 14 pages; Sep. 2006. |
Jeffs; Beamforming: a brief introduction; Brigham Young University; 14 pages; retrieved from the internet (http://ens.ewi.tudelft.nl/Education/courses/et4235/Beamforming.pdf); Oct. 2004. |
Khamene et al.; A novel phantom-less spatial and temporal ultrasound calibration method; Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI (Proceedings 8th Int. Conf.); Springer Berlin Heidelberg; Palm Springs, CA; pp. 65-72; Oct. 26-29, 2005. |
Kramb et al,.; Considerations for using phased array ultrasonics in a fully automated inspection system. Review of Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, vol. 23, ed. D. O. Thompson and D. E. Chimenti, pp. 817-825, (year of publication is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filed and any foreign priority date) 2004. |
Ledesma-Carbayo et al.; Spatio-temporal nonrigid registration for ultrasound cardiac motion estimation; IEEE Trans. On Medical Imaging; vol. 24; No. 9; Sep. 2005. |
Leotta et al.; Quantitative three-dimensional echocardiography by rapid imaging . . . ; J American Society of Echocardiography; vol. 10; No. 8; ppl 830-839; Oct. 1997. |
Li et al.; An efficient speckle tracking algorithm for ultrasonic imaging; 24; pp. 215-228; Oct. 1, 2002. |
Morrison et al.; A probabilistic neural network based image segmentation network for magnetic resonance images; Proc. Conf. Neural Networks; Baltimore, MD; vol. 3; pp. 60-65; Jun. 1992. |
Nadkarni et al.; Cardiac motion synchronization for 3D cardiac ultrasound imaging; Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Western Ontario; Jun. 2002. |
Press et al.; Cubic spline interpolation; §3.3 in “Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN: The Art of Scientific Computing”, 2nd Ed.; Cambridge, England; Cambridge University Press; pp. 107-110; Sep. 1992. |
Sakas et al.; Preprocessing and volume rendering of 3D ultrasonic data; IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications; pp. 47-54, Jul. 1995. |
Sapia et al.; Deconvolution of ultrasonic waveforms using an adaptive wiener filter; Review of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation; vol. 13A; Plenum Press; pp. 855-862; (year of publication is sufficiently earlier than the effective U.S. filed and any foreign priority date) 1994. |
Sapia et al.; Ultrasound image deconvolution using adaptive inverse filtering; 12 IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, Cbms, pp. 248-253; Jun. 1999. |
Sapia, Mark Angelo; Multi-dimensional deconvolution of optical microscope and ultrasound imaging using adaptive least-mean-square (LMS) inverse filtering; Ph.D. Dissertation; University of Connecticut; Jan. 2000. |
Smith et al.; High-speed ultrasound volumetric imaging system. 1. Transducer design and beam steering; IEEE Trans. Ultrason., Ferroelect., Freq. Contr.; vol. 38; pp. 100-108; Mar. 1991. |
Specht et al.; Deconvolution techniques for digital longitudinal tomography; SPIE; vol. 454; presented at Application of Optical Instrumentation in Medicine XII; pp. 319-325; Jun. 1984. |
Specht et al.; Experience with adaptive PNN and adaptive GRNN; Proc. IEEE International Joint Conf. on Neural Networks; vol. 2; pp. 1203-1208; Orlando, FL; Jun. 1994. |
Specht, D.F.; A general regression neural network; IEEE Trans. On Neural Networks; vol. 2.; No. 6; Nov. 1991. |
Specht, D.F.; Blind deconvolution of motion blur using LMS inverse filtering; Lockheed Independent Research (unpublished); Jun. 23, 1975. |
Specht, D.F.; Enhancements to probabilistic neural networks; Proc. IEEE International Joint Conf. on Neural Networks; Baltimore, MD; Jun. 1992. |
Specht, D.F.; GRNN with double clustering; Proc. IEEE International Joint Conf. Neural Networks; Vancouver, Canada; Jul. 16-21, 2006. |
Specht, D.F.; Probabilistic neural networks; Pergamon Press; Neural Networks; vol. 3; pp. 109-118; Feb. 1990. |
UCLA Academic Technology; SPSS learning module: How can I analyze a subset of my data; 6 pages; retrieved from the internet (http://www.ats.ucla.edu/stat/spss/modules/subset_analyze.htm) Nov. 26, 2001. |
Von Ramm et al.; High-speed ultrasound volumetric imaging—System. 2. Parallel processing and image display; IEEE Trans. Ultrason., Ferroelect., Freq. Contr.; vol. 38; pp. 109-115; Mar. 1991. |
Wang et al.; Photoacoustic tomography of biological tissues with high cross-section resolution; reconstruction and experiment; Medical Physics; 29(12); pp. 2799-2805; Dec. 2002. |
Wells, P.N.T.; Biomedical ultrasonics; Academic Press; London, New York, San Francisco; pp. 124-125; Mar. 1977. |
Widrow et al.; Adaptive signal processing; Prentice-Hall; Englewood Cliffs, NJ; pp. 99-116; Mar. 1985. |
Wikipedia; Point cloud; 2 pages; retrieved Nov. 24, 2014 from the Internet (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Point_cloud&oldid=472583138). |
Wikipedia; Curve fitting; 5 pages; retrieved from the internet (http:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curve_fitting) Dec. 19, 2010. |
Wikipedia; Speed of sound; 17 pages; retrieved from the internet (http:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_sound) Feb. 15, 2011. |
Arigovindan et al.; Full motion and flow field recovery from echo doppler data; IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging; 26(1); pp. 31-45; Jan. 2007. |
Capineri et al.; A doppler system for dynamic vector velocity maps; Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology; 28(2); pp. 237-248; Feb. 28, 2002. |
Dunmire et al.; A brief history of vector doppler; Medical Imaging 2001; International Society for Optics and Photonics; pp. 200-214; May 30, 2001. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160354059 A1 | Dec 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60862951 | Oct 2006 | US | |
60940261 | May 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14754422 | Jun 2015 | US |
Child | 15240884 | US | |
Parent | 14157257 | Jan 2014 | US |
Child | 14754422 | US | |
Parent | 13632929 | Oct 2012 | US |
Child | 14157257 | US | |
Parent | 13215966 | Aug 2011 | US |
Child | 13632929 | US | |
Parent | 11865501 | Oct 2007 | US |
Child | 13215966 | US |