Method and apparatus to provide a personalized channel

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8943540
  • Patent Number
    8,943,540
  • Date Filed
    Friday, July 18, 2008
    16 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, January 27, 2015
    9 years ago
Abstract
A method and apparatus for automatically delivering data files (e.g. television and movies) via a personalized channel to a user, that are based on a user's profile and viewing habits, are provided. A client receives meta-data broadcasts from a server system that includes descriptions of a plurality of data files currently being broadcasted or to be broadcast by the server system. In response to a content rating table that is based on a user's profile and viewing habits, a data file is automatically selected. The selected data file is displayed on a personalized channel on a display device to the user. The selected data file can be, for example, a currently broadcasting data file or a data file stored in a cache memory of the client. Thus, the user only needs to tune to his or her personalized channel to view personalized content.
Description
FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates generally to broadcast systems and, more specifically, the present invention relates to providing a personalized channel.


BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Broadcast systems traditionally transmit data in one direction from a server system to a plurality of client systems. For example, television and movies today are delivered via network and content aggregators. Moreover, content is delivered in a manner that has the broadest appeal. As an illustration, many of today's television broadcasters rely upon Neilson ratings to determine broadcast programming and/or scheduling. Neilson ratings are generally based upon only a small sampling of a cross-section of the public. Consequently, most television viewers have relatively little or no impact on broadcast schedules and/or content. Users of client systems typically just consume the signals received from the server system as they are broadcast.


One paradigm in which users are provided with some input into the content delivered to them is “content on demand,” which involves server systems that broadcast the same data continuously and/or at staggered intervals. Thus, if a user desires to consume a particular data file on demand, the user “tunes in” to one of the repeated broadcasts of the data file. One example of this paradigm can be illustrated with present day “pay per view” movies that are available from cable or satellite television providers. For instance, cable television providers commonly broadcast the same movies repeatedly on multiple channels at staggered intervals. Users that wish to watch a particular movie “on demand” simply tune in to one of the channels on which the desired movie is broadcast at the beginning of one of the times that the movie is broadcast. The continuous and repeated broadcasts of the same data or programs results in a very inefficient use of broadcast bandwidth. Bandwidth used to broadcast the same data repeatedly on multiple channels could otherwise be used to broadcast different data.


Another paradigm for providing content on demand in a broadcast system involves a user recording a particular data file and later accessing the data file “on demand.” Continuing with the television broadcast illustration discussed above, an example of this paradigm is a user setting up his or her video cassette recorder (VCR) to record a desired television program. Later, when the user wishes to watch the television program “on demand,” the user simply plays the earlier recorded program from his or her VCR. Recently, more advanced digital video recorders have become available, which record the television broadcasts on internal hard drives instead of the video cassette tapes used by traditional VCRs. However, use of the digital video recorders is similar to traditional VCRs in that the users are required to explicitly set the criteria used (e.g. date, time) to determine which broadcasts are recorded on the internal hard drives.


Other paradigms have been established to deliver content targeted at specific interest groups such as core interest channels, e.g. the Cartoon Network, the Disney Network, the E! Entertainment Network, etc.


However, even with the use of these new paradigms to provide targeted content and content “on demand,” none of these paradigms take into account a user's past viewing history and automatically and specifically target content for a given user.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention is illustrated by way of example and not limitation in the accompanying figures.



FIG. 1A is a block diagram illustrating one embodiment of a broadcast system in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.



FIG. 1B is a block diagram illustrating another embodiment of a broadcast system in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.



FIG. 1C is a block diagram illustrating yet another embodiment of a broadcast system in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram of one embodiment of a computer system representative of a client or a server in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.



FIG. 3 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment of the flow of events in a server and a client when broadcasting meta-data and data files in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.



FIG. 4 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment of the flow of events in a client when processing meta-data broadcast from a server to maintain a meta-data table and content rating table in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.



FIG. 5 is an illustration of one example of meta-data broadcast by a server to describe a data file in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.



FIG. 6 is an illustration of one example of a meta-data table updated and maintained by a client in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.



FIG. 7 is an illustration of one example of a content rating table updated and maintained by a client in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.



FIG. 8 is a diagram an illustrating one embodiment of data files that are classified by a user in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.



FIG. 9 is a diagram illustrating one embodiment of a meta-data table that is updated in response to user classifications in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.



FIG. 10 is a diagram illustrating one embodiment of a meta-data table that is updated after a user access in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.



FIG. 11 is a diagram illustrating one embodiment of a content rating table that is updated after a user access in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.



FIG. 12 is a diagram illustrating another embodiment of a meta-data table that is updated after another user access in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.



FIG. 13 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment of a process for selecting and displaying a data file on a personalized channel.



FIG. 14 is a flow diagram illustrating another, more detailed, embodiment of a process for selecting and displaying a data file on a personalized channel.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

In one aspect of the present invention, signaling methods and apparatuses for providing content on demand in a broadcast system are disclosed. In another aspect of the present invention, methods and apparatuses are disclosed for rating content to be broadcast or to be broadcast potentially from a server are disclosed. In yet another aspect of the present invention, methods and apparatuses for dynamically determining the broadcast content and/or schedule of a server are disclosed.


In one particular embodiment of the present invention, a method, apparatus, and machine-readable medium for automatically delivering data files (e.g. television and movies) via a personalized channel to a user, that are based on the user's profile and viewing habits, are provided. The personalized channel is displayed on a display device to the user. This enables a passive viewing experience for the end-user. The user only needs to tune to his or her personalized channel (e.g. channel 99) to view personalized content synthesized from all of available content sources available to the user. As an illustration, the content can be reviewed from a multitude of sources such as cable, standard television (TV) signals (e.g. National Television Standards Committee NTSC), Advanced Television System Committee (ATSC) format, Digital Video Broadcast (DVB) format, over a computer network, etc.)


In the following description, the various embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail. However, such details are included to facilitate understanding of the invention and to describe exemplary embodiments for implementing the invention. Such details should not be used to limit the invention to the particular embodiments described because other variations and embodiments are possible while staying within the scope of the invention. Furthermore, although numerous details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that these specific details are not required in order to practice the present invention. In other instances details such as, well-known methods, types of data, protocols, procedures, components, networking equipment, electrical structures and circuits, are not described in detail, or are shown in block diagram form, in order not to obscure the present invention. Furthermore, aspects of the invention will be described in particular embodiments but may be implemented in hardware, software, firmware, middleware, or a combination thereof.



FIG. 1A is an illustration of one embodiment of a broadcast system in accordance with the teachings of the present invention. As illustrated in the depicted embodiment, a server 103 is configured to broadcast information to a plurality of clients 105, 107 and 109. In the embodiment shown in FIG. 1A, client 105 receives a broadcast from server 103 through a link 115 from a broadcast antenna 111. Similarly, client 107 receives a broadcast from server 103 through a link 117 and client 109 receives a broadcast from server 103 through a link 119 from broadcast antenna 111. In one embodiment, links 115, 117 and 119 are uni-directional wireless radio frequency (RF) links from broadcast antenna in a format such as for example, but not limited to known amplitude modulation (AM) or frequency modulation (FM) radio signals, standard television (TV) signals (e.g. National Television Standards Committee (NTSC)), Advanced Television System Committee (ATSC) format, digital video broadcast (DVB) signals or the like, which are broadcast through the atmosphere.


In one embodiment, server 103 is configured to broadcast a plurality of data files, which may be received by clients 105, 107 and 109. In one embodiment, the data files may be any combination of a number of different types of files including for example video, audio, graphics, text, multi-media or the like. For purposes of explanation, many of the examples provided in this disclosure to help describe the present invention assume that the data files to be broadcast by the server are audio/video files, such as for example movies with moving images and sound. However, it will be appreciated that the data files broadcast in accordance with the teachings of the present invention are not limited only to audio/video files.


As illustrated in the embodiment shown FIG. 1A, there is a one-way or uni-directional link between the server 103 and clients 105, 107 and 109. However, in another embodiment, it is appreciated that there may also be a communications link between server 103 and each client 105, 107 and 109, respectively. In particular, FIG. 1B is an illustration of the broadcast system of FIG. 1A with the addition of a “back channel” or communications link between each client 105, 107 and 109 and server 103. In particular, the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 1B shows links 121, 123 and 125, which may be used by clients 105, 107 and 109, respectively, to send information back to server 103. In one embodiment, however, links 121, 123 and 125 are not utilized in accordance with the teachings of the present invention. As will be discussed, in another embodiment, links 121, 123 and 125 are utilized in accordance with the teachings of the present invention. Although links 121, 123 and 125 are illustrated in FIG. 1B as direct links between clients 105, 107 and 109 and server 103, it is appreciated that clients 105, 107 and 109 may communicate information to server 103 through indirect links such as for example but not limited to broadcasted wireless signals, network communications or the like.



FIG. 1C is an illustration of yet another embodiment of a broadcast system in accordance with the teachings of the present invention. As shown, server 103 is coupled to broadcast information to a plurality of clients 105, 107 and 109 through a network 113. In one embodiment, network 113 may be any type of communications network through which a plurality of different devices may communicate such as for example but not limited to the Internet, a wide area network (WAN), a local area network (LAN), an intranet, or the like.


In the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 1C, client 105 is coupled to receive information broadcast from server 103 through link 115. Similarly, client 107 is coupled to receive information broadcast from server 103 through link 117 and client 109 coupled to receive information broadcast from server 103 through link 119. It is noted that in the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 1C, links 115, 117 and 119 are shown as uni-directional links from network 113 to clients 105, 107 and 109. In another embodiment, links 115, 117 and 119 are bi-directional links, which enable clients 105, 107 and 109 to communication information to server 103. For example, links 115, 117 and 119 could be cable links.



FIG. 2 is a block diagram illustrating one embodiment of a machine 201 that may be used for the server 103, or clients 103, 105 or 107 in accordance with the teachings of the present invention. In one embodiment, machine 201 is a computer or a set top box that includes a processor 203 coupled to a bus 207. In one embodiment, memory 205, storage 211, display controller 209, communications interface 213, input/output controller 215 and audio controller 227 are also coupled to bus 207.


In one embodiment, machine 201 interfaces to external systems through communications interface 213. Communications interface 213 may include a radio transceiver compatible with FM, TV, digital TV, DVB, wireless telephone signals or the like. Communications interface 213 may also include an analog modem, Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) modem, cable modem, Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) modem, a T-1 line interface, a T-3 line interface, an optical carrier interface (e.g. OC-3), token ring interface, satellite transmission interface, a wireless interface or other interfaces for coupling a device to other devices.


In one embodiment, a carrier wave signal 223 is received by communications interface 213 to communicate with antenna 111. In one embodiment, carrier wave signal 225 is received/transmitted between communications interface 213 and network 113. In one embodiment, a communications signal 225 may be used to interface machine 201 with another computer system, a network hub, router or the like. In one embodiment, carrier wave signals 223 and 225 are considered to be machine readable media, which may be transmitted through wires, cables, optical fibers or through the atmosphere, or the like.


In one embodiment, processor 203 may be a conventional microprocessor, such as for example but not limited to an Intel x86 or Pentium family microprocessor, a Motorola family microprocessor, or the like. Memory 205 may be a machine readable medium such as dynamic random access memory (DRAM) and may include static random access memory (SRAM). Display controller 209 controls in a conventional manner a display device 219, which in one embodiment may be a cathode ray tube (CRT), a liquid crystal display (LCD), an active matrix display, a television monitor or the like. The input/output device 217 coupled to input/output controller 215 may be a keyboard, disk drive, printer, scanner and other input and output devices, including a television remote, mouse, trackball, trackpad, joystick, or the like. In one embodiment, audio controller 227 controls in a conventional manner audio output 231, which may include for example audio speakers, headphones, an audio receiver, amplifier or the like. In one embodiment, controller also controls in a conventional manner audio input 229, which may include for example a microphone or input(s) from an audio or musical device, or the like.


Storage 211 in one embodiment may include machine readable media such as for example but not limited to a magnetic hard disk, a floppy disk, an optical disk, a smart card or another form of storage for data. In one embodiment, storage 211 may include removable media, read-only media, readable/writable media or the like. Some of the data may be written by a direct memory access process into memory 205 during execution of software in computer system 201. It is appreciated that software may reside in storage 211, memory 205 or may be transmitted or received via modem or communications interface 213. For the purposes of the specification, the term “machine readable medium” shall be taken to include any medium that is capable of storing data, information or encoding a sequence of instructions for execution by processor 203 to cause processor 203 to perform the methodologies of the present invention. The term “machine readable medium” shall be taken to include, but is not limited to solid-state memories, optical and magnetic disks, carrier wave signals, and the like.


In one embodiment, a broadcast system, such as for example one similar to any of those illustrated in FIGS. 1A-1C, is configured to have a server 103 broadcast a plurality of data files to a plurality of clients 105, 107 and 109. As will be discussed in greater detail below, each of the plurality of data files is described with meta-data in accordance with teachings of one embodiment of the present invention. In general, meta-data can be considered as a set of descriptors or attribute values that describe content or data files to be broadcast or potentially broadcast from server 103. The meta-data of the present invention provides information that enables client systems 105, 107 and 109 to reason and make informed decisions regarding the content of data files to be broadcast later by server 103. As will be discussed, various embodiments of the present invention utilize the meta-data for client-side filtering, storage management and other personalization techniques as well as determine broadcast schedules and content of future server broadcasts. For example, embodiments of the present invention provide for automatically delivering data files (e.g. television and movies) on a personalized channel 214 for display on the display device 219 to the user, that are based on a user's profile and viewing habits.



FIG. 3 is a flow diagram illustrating the processing that is performed in accordance with teachings of one embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 3 illustrates one embodiment of a signaling protocol in which signals are transmitted such that client systems can locate and acquire broadcast content. This includes a pre-broadcast of meta-data by server 103 to client systems 105, 107 and 109. In particular, process block 303 of FIG. 3 shows that the server broadcasts the meta-data broadcast schedules to the clients. In one embodiment, the meta-data broadcast schedule indicates some point in the future when the actual meta-data of the present invention is going to be broadcast by the server. In one embodiment, the client systems use known ports such as for example those used in the program and system information protocol (PSIP), DVB, service advertising protocol (SAP) or the like to listen for upcoming service announcements from the server.


In one embodiment, each client 105, 107 and 109 contains a known scheduling service, which accepts requests to wake up, or be activated, at a specific time to receive the information broadcast by the server. This scheduling service enables the client to wake up at a specified time and select a specified service. For example, in one embodiment, this selection process can be accomplished by tuning to a specific frequency, such as for example in an Advanced Television Systems Committee (ATSC) or a DVB transponder or the like. In one embodiment, the selection process or can be based on a set of data, such as for example multi-cast Internet protocol (IP) addresses, which define a service.


In one embodiment, a client application registers with the client signaling system to receive signals from a specific content provider. The client signaling system maintains a table of applications associated with specific content providers. In one embodiment, information from the server is broadcast over known addresses such that each client can use the known address.


Process block 305 shows that the client receives the meta-data broadcast schedule from the server. In one embodiment, client systems 105, 107 and 109 capture and process this pre-broadcast information in order to determine when to wake-up and receive content, where to receive the content and which content to receive. In one embodiment, when the meta-data broadcast schedule is received by the client, the registered application in the client is notified to receive the meta-data broadcast schedule.


In one embodiment, the clients wake-up at the pre-specified time indicated in the meta-data broadcast schedule to receive the meta-data from the server. Process block 307 shows that the meta-data is then actually broadcast from the server to the clients at the time specified in the meta-data broadcast schedule. Process block 309 shows that the client receives the broadcast of meta-data from the server. As will be discussed, the meta-data includes descriptions of a plurality of data files that will be broadcast or potentially broadcast later by the server system.


Process block 311 shows that the client system then updates a meta-data table and a content rating table. In one embodiment, a meta-data table and a content rating table are updated and maintained internally or locally by each client system in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.


In one embodiment, a user of the client system may optionally classify any one or more of the plurality of data files that are described by the received meta-data. As will be discussed, the meta-data table and content rating table are updated by the client if there is a user classification. This is shown in FIG. 3 with process block 313.


In one embodiment, the clients wake-up to receive a data file broadcast schedule from the server. In one embodiment, the data file broadcast schedule indicates a future time in which specific data files, which were described in the previously broadcast meta-data, will be broadcast by the server. Process block 315 shows that the data files are then actually broadcast from the server to the clients at the time specified in the data file broadcast schedule. Process block 317 shows that the client receives the broadcast of data file broadcast schedule from the server.


In one embodiment, the clients wake-up at the pre-specified time indicated in the data file broadcast schedule to receive the data files from the server. Process block 319 shows that the data files are then actually broadcast from the server to the clients at the time specified in the data file broadcast schedule.


In one embodiment, process block 321 shows that the client receives the broadcast of the data files from the server. In one embodiment, client-side filtering according to the present invention is provided the client selectively storing data files according to the content rating table. In another embodiment, client-side filtering is provided by the client selectively waking up to selectively receive data files broadcast from the server according to the content rating table. In this embodiment, the client then stores the data files that were selectively received by the client according to the content rating table.


In one embodiment, the client receives meta-data broadcasts from the server system that includes descriptions for a plurality of data files that are currently being broadcasted, as well. As an illustration, meta-data can be included as part of an Electronic Program Guide (EPG) or an Expended Program Information Signal (EPI).


In one embodiment, in response to a content rating table that is based on a user's profile and viewing habits, a data file is automatically selected for the user, when the user tunes to his or her personalized channel 214 (e.g. channel 99). The data file can be selected based upon the ratings and/or relevance of the data file in relation to the content rating table. The automatically selected data file can be, for example a currently broadcasting data file or a data file stored in a cache memory of the client 201. As previously discussed, data files can be stored in cache memory, based upon the content rating table, for later viewing by a user.


In one embodiment, process block 323 shows that the client 201 displays data files for channels selected by the user on the display device 219, and particularly, displays the automatically selected data file on the personalized channel 214 on the display device 219, when the personalized channel 214 is picked by user. Thus, the client 201 streams data files (e.g. television and movies) tailored to the individual's tastes from live and captured content on the personalized channel 214 to the display device 219, with no user interaction required, except to pick the personalized channel 214.


In one embodiment, process block 325 shows that the client then updates the meta-data table and content rating table if there are any user accesses of currently broadcasting data files or stored data files. For purposes of this disclosure, a user access may include a user interacting with, viewing, watching, listening to, reading, consuming, etc., a data file. For instance, one example of a user accessing a data file may be the user watching a particular movie or listening to a particular song provided by one of the stored data files in client. In one embodiment, a user access will result in the meta-data table and content rating table on the client being updated locally.



FIG. 4 is a more detailed flow diagram illustrating one embodiment of the flow of events in a client when processing meta-data broadcasted from a server and updating and maintaining a meta-data table and a content rating table in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.


The meta-data table and content rating table create, what is often termed a user profile, which is based upon a user's past viewing history and preferences and is used to predict what sort of data files (e.g. televisions and movies) the user would likely want to watch. The meta-data table, content rating table, user profiles, etc. may be stored locally at the client 201 (e.g. in memory 205, storage 211, etc.) or elsewhere (e.g. as part of a LAN or WAN).


For example, the processor 203 of the client 201 may run instances of what is often termed a preference engine or relevance engine, to create and update the meta-data table and content rating table. However, this can also be done remotely such as, part of a LAN, WAN, etc. A preference or relevance engine can be used to track user selection of data files (i.e. the channels selected and the types of content of the data files) and to create the meta-data table and the content rating table, representing the user's viewing preferences. Thus, the client 201 has a “learning” capability for adjusting a user's viewing preferences. For example a user's viewing preferences may be categorized based on broadcast content and the associated programming attributes associated with a data file, such as the genre (e.g. action, sports, comedy, entertainment, drama, etc.) as well as, associated attributes assigned by the program guide such as titles of data files, actors, directors, writers, etc.


For example, the processor 203 can run instances of a preference or relevance engine to automatically select the data file for the user. For instance, in response to the meta-data table and the content rating table, the preference or relevance engine can rate or determine the relevance of data files and automatically select the highest rated or most relevant data file, which is then displayed on the personalized channel 214 on the display device 219 to the user, when the user picks the personalized channel. As previously discussed, the selected data file can be, for example, a currently broadcasting data file or a data file stored in a cache memory of the client. Thus, the client 201 can stream data files (e.g. television and movies) tailored to the individual's tastes from live and captured content on a personalized channel 214 to the display device 219, with no user interaction required, except to pick the personalized channel.


Although, some types of user profiles and preference engines are already known, the present invention provides, as will be discussed with reference to the following FIGS. 4-14, a novel meta-data table and content rating table (e.g. for use as a user profile) and novel methods of processing this type of data (e.g. based upon ratings, relevance, and believability) for automatically selecting data files (e.g. based upon a user's preferences) for storage and for viewing on a personalized channel 214, among other things.


Continuing with reference to FIG. 4, process block 403 shows that a meta-data table is updated with attributes and attribute values included in the meta-data broadcasted from the server. Process block 405 shows that the content rating table is then updated with an entry for each one of the data files described by the meta-data broadcast from the server.


In one embodiment, it is assumed that a meta-data table, a content rating table and a plurality of data files already exist in the client system. In one embodiment, the meta-data table, content rating table and plurality of data files may be stored and maintained in the client system in memory 205, storage 211 or by accessing a local network or the like with machine 201, as illustrated in the embodiment shown in FIG. 2.


To help illustrate the meta-data aspect of the present invention, FIG. 5 is an example of one embodiment of meta-data 501, which may be broadcast by the server 103 to the clients 105, 107 and 109. For explanation purposes, it is assumed that the data files broadcast by server 103 in this example are audio/video files such as for example movies or TV programming. As mentioned above, data files may be other types of files such as for example but not limited to audio, graphics, text, multi-media or the like.


In the illustrated embodiment, meta-data 501 in FIG. 5 shows that four movies, or data files, will be broadcast later by server 103. These movies shown in this example are “Action Dude,” “The Funny Show,” “Blast 'Em” and “Hardy Har Har.” Meta-data 501 includes attributes and attribute values that describe each one of the movies to be broadcast later by server 103. In the example illustrated, two attributes are provided to describe each movie in meta-data 501. The attributes shown in FIG. 5 are “Actor” and “Genre.” It is appreciated that other embodiment of the present invention may include different attributes as well as other attributes values. For instance, a non-exhaustive list of other attributes that may be used to describe movies may include “Director,” “Year,” “Effects,” “Ending,” etc. In one embodiment, for example, 40-50 different attributes are provided to describe movies in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.


Moreover, meta-data broadcasts from the server system can include descriptions for a plurality of data files that are currently being broadcasted or to be potentially broadcasted in the future. As an illustration, meta-data can be included as part of an Electronic Program Guide (EPG) or an Expanded Program Information Signal (EPI). This meta-data associated with EPGs and EPIs typically includes the name of the program, dates and times, movie rating, actors, genre (e.g. sports, action, comedy, drama, entertainment, news, etc), directors, writers, etc. Furthermore, EPIs often include information related to commercials, the expected life of content, additional information (e.g. website links for advertisers), etc. It should be appreciated that EPGs and EPIs and the types of information they contain are known in the art.


Referring back to the particular example shown in FIG. 5, “Action Dude” is an “action” movie featuring actor “Joe Smith.” “The Funny Show” is “comedy” movie featuring actress “Jane Doe.” “Blast 'Em” is an “action” movie featuring actor “Jane Doe.” “Hardy Har Har” is a “comedy” movie featuring “Joe Smith.”


To help illustrate the meta-data table aspect of the present invention, FIG. 6 is an example of one embodiment of meta-data table 601, which is updated and maintained locally by each client 105, 107 and 109. In the illustrated embodiment, meta-data table 601 in FIG. 6 has been populated with the data included in meta-data 501, which was broadcasted earlier from server 103. In one embodiment, meta-data table 601 includes a list of attributes, attribute values and corresponding relevance values and believability factors. In particular, meta-data table 601 includes attribute values “Joe Smith,” “Jane Doe,” “action,” and “comedy.” At this time, the relevance values and believability factors for attribute values “Joe Smith,” “Jane Doe,” “action,” and “comedy” are all zero in FIG. 6. As will be shown, in one embodiment, the relevance values and believability factors of the present invention will be updated and maintained as the user interacts with the client system.


In one embodiment, the relevance values in meta-data table 601 are indicators as to how relevant the associated attribute and attribute values are for predicting a particular user's behavior. For instance, the relevance value indicates how likely it is for the user to watch a particular movie because of this particular attribute value. In one embodiment, relevance values in meta-data table 601 are within a range of values such as for example from −10 to 10. As will be discussed, the relevance value may be increased if for example the user watches a particular movie or at least expresses an interest in a particular movie having that particular attribute value. Conversely, the relevance value may be decreased if the user for example does not watch a particular movie or if the user explicitly indicates that he or she does not want to watch a particular movie having that particular attribute value.


In one embodiment, the believability factors in meta-data table 601 are weighting factors to be applied to specific attribute and attribute value pairs when rating or predicting whether a user will actually access a particular data file having that particular attribute value. In one embodiment, believability factors in meta-data table 601 are within a range of values such as for example from −10 to 10. In one embodiment, the believability factors may be increased for example when an attribute value accurately predicts a data file in which the user is interested. Conversely, the believability factors may be decreased when a user is interested in the data file, even though the particular attribute value indicates otherwise.


In one embodiment, meta-data table 601 entries are constructed from the aggregation of all meta-data 501 associated with potential content or data files to be broadcast from server 103. In one embodiment, entries in meta-data table 601 are updated based on explicit user requests. In addition, updates to meta-data table 601 may also be implicitly based on whether a user accesses specific data files having particular attribute values, independent of whether the user explicitly classifies a particular movie.


To help illustrate the content rating table aspect of the present invention, FIG. 7 is an example of one embodiment of a content rating table 701, which in one embodiment is updated and maintained locally by each client 105, 107 and 109. In the illustrated embodiment, content rating table 701 in FIG. 7 includes a list of the data files described in meta-data 501 as well as any additional data files that are currently stored or cached locally by the client.


In one embodiment, data files may be stored locally by the client in for example memory 205, storage 211 or in a locally accessible network by machine 201 of FIG. 2. For purposes of this disclosure, data files being stored locally by the client may also be interpreted to include a data file stored “locally” by the client in a known network storage configuration, separate from the server. For purposes of this disclosure, the data file being stored or cached locally by the client is to be interpreted as the data file being stored for later access, retrieval or consumption. In one embodiment, the local cache of the present invention is considered to be a first level cache. Thus, the local cache the present invention is sized accordingly to increase the possibility of a single hit.


Referring back to the continuing example of data files representing audio/video files, a movie is stored locally by the client. After a user watches the movie, the storage space occupied by the movie is generally considered to be available for storage of another movie to be broadcast sometime later. Thus, it is appreciated that the local cache of the client system is modeled as the single use system, e.g. fire and forget, in accordance with teachings of the present invention. In one embodiment, it is assumed that when a user accesses a data file, it is not likely that the user will want to access that same data file again. If a user has not watched a particular movie, the storage space occupied by that movie is generally considered not to be available for storage of another movie. However, if there is no additional storage space available and a higher rated movie is to be broadcast, the lower rated unwatched movie is replaced by the higher rated movie in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.


Referring back to the embodiment of content rating table 701 shown FIG. 7, each movie also has an associated rating, a rating type indicator, an in cache indicator and a next treatment indicator. In one embodiment, the rating indicates a rating value for the associated data file. The rating value in one embodiment may either be explicitly input by a user or implicitly generated by the client system by processing meta-data associated with that particular data file. In one embodiment, a relatively high rating value predicts that the particular data file may be of interest to the user. Conversely, in one embodiment, a relatively low rating value predicts that the particular data file is unlikely to be of interest to the user.


In one embodiment, the rating type indicator indicates whether the rating value of this particular data file was a result of explicit input from the user or if the rating value was implicitly generated by the client system. Thus, in one embodiment, the rating type indicator of content rating table 701 may be explicit, implicit or N/A if the data file or movie has not yet been rated. In one embodiment, if a data file has been explicitly classified by a user, the rating values of attribute values of the data file are no longer updated implicitly by the client system. However, if a data file has not yet been classified or has only been implicitly rated by the client system, the rating of the attribute values of the data file may be further updated or adjusted by the client system.


In one embodiment, the in cache indicator indicates whether that particular data file is currently stored or cached locally by the client. In the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 7, the movies “Action Dude,” “The Funny Show” and “Blast 'Em” already exist in the local storage of the client system. Conversely, the movie “Hardy Har Har” has not been stored in the local storage of the client system in the example illustrated in FIG. 7.


In one embodiment, the next treatment indicator is used to track future actions to be taken for the particular data file. For example, if a movie has already been watched by the user, the next treatment indicator would indicate “replace” to indicate that the storage space occupied by that particular movie is available for storage of another movie. In one embodiment, if the movie has not yet been watched by the user, the next treatment indicator would indicate “keep.” In one embodiment, if the movie has not been stored locally by the client and if the rating value predicts that this particular movie may be of interest to the user, the next treatment indicator would indicate “capture.” In one of embodiment, if the movie has not yet been broadcast by the server and the rating predicts that this movie is unlikely to be of interest to the user, the next treatment indicator would indicate “ignore.”


As was discussed back to FIG. 4, process blocks 403 and 405 show that the meta-data table and the content rating table are updated according to meta-data broadcast from the server. Decision block 407 shows that it is then determined whether there is a user classification of any of the data files. Referring briefly to FIG. 8, an example is shown where a user classifies some of the movies, as described by meta-data 501. In particular, the user has expressed interest in the movie “Action Dude” by indicating that he or she wishes to receive that movie. In this example, the user has expressed that he or she does not have any interest in the movie “The Funny Show” by indicating that he or she refuses that movie. In this example, the user has not provided any information or classification regarding any of the remaining movies.


Referring back to FIG. 4, if the user has classified any of the data files, process block 409 shows that the relevance values of the particular attributes of the classified data files are updated in meta-data table 601. Process block 411 shows that the ratings of data files having attribute values with relevance values that were adjusted in response to the user classification(s) are also adjusted. In one embodiment, if the user has not classified any data files, process blocks 409 and 411 are skipped.


To illustrate an example of when a user classifies data files, FIG. 9 shows a meta-data table 601 that is updated or adjusted in response to a user classification. In the example provided in FIG. 8, the user indicated that he or she was interested in the movie “Action Dude.” Meta-data 501 in FIG. 5 shows that “Action Dude” features actor “Joe Smith” and is an “action” movie. Thus, referring to meta-data table 601 in FIG. 9, the relevance values for attribute values “Joe Smith” and “action” are adjusted to reflect that the user explicitly expressed an interest in “Action Dude.” In one embodiment, the relevance values are increased to reflect that the user was interested. As will be discussed, in one embodiment, the believability factors associated with each attribute value are not updated until there is a user access of the data file having that particular attribute value.


Continuing with the example of FIG. 8, the user indicated that he or she was not interested in the movie “The Funny Show.” Meta-data 501 in FIG. 5 shows that “The Funny Show” features actress “Jane Doe” and is a “comedy” movie. Thus, referring back to meta-data table 601 in FIG. 9, the relevance values for attribute values “Jane Doe” and “comedy” are adjusted to reflect that the user explicitly expressed that he or she was not interested in “The Funny Show.” In one embodiment, the relevance values are decremented to reflect that the user was not interested.


Continuing with the example of FIG. 8, the user did not provide any information regarding the movies “Blast 'Em” and “Hardy Har Har.” Accordingly, the relevance values of the attribute values associated with “Blast 'Em” and “Hardy Har Har” are not updated in meta-data table 601.


As will be discussed, in one embodiment, updates to the ratings in content rating table 701, as described in process block 411, are related to the relevance values and believability factors of the attribute values listed in meta-data table 601. A detailed description of the processing that occurs in process block 411 will be discussed below with a discussion of process block 417.


Referring back to FIG. 4, if the user accesses any of the data files, e.g. the user watches a movie, as determined in decision block 413, process block 415 shows that the relevance values and the believability factors of the particular attributes of the user accessed data files are updated in meta-data table 601. Process block 417 shows that the ratings of data files having attribute values with relevance values that were adjusted in response to the user access(es) are also adjusted. If the user has not accessed any data files, process blocks 415 and 417 are skipped.


To illustrate an example of a user accessing data files, assume that the user watches the movie “Action Dude.” Meta-data 501 in FIG. 5 shows that “Action Dude” features actor “Joe Smith” and is an “action” movie. In one embodiment, each time a user accesses or interacts with particular data file, the believability factor of the attribute values of that film are adjusted or updated. In one embodiment, for attribute values having relevance values greater than zero, the believability factor for that attribute value is increased, since that attribute value accurately served as a predictor for a data file that the user would access. In one embodiment, for attribute values having relevance values less than zero, the believability factor for that attribute value is decreased, since that attribute value did not accurately serve as a predictor for a data file that the user would access. Therefore, FIG. 10 shows a meta-data table 601 that is updated or adjusted in response to the user access of “Action Dude.” In this example, the believability factors of “Joe Smith” and “action” are increased since the relevance values for these attribute values were greater than zero.


In one embodiment, the relevance values associated with implicitly rated data files are also increased in meta-data table 601 in response to a user access. However, in the example shown in meta-data table 601 of FIG. 10, “Action Dude” was explicitly classified by the user. In one embodiment, the relevance values are not updated in meta-data table 601 in response to a user access of data files explicitly classified by the user.



FIG. 11 shows content rating table 701, which is updated in response to the user access of “Action Dude,” as described in process block 417. As mentioned earlier, content rating table 701 is also updated as described in process block 411 in accordance with the teachings of the present invention. As shown in content rating table 701 of FIG. 11, “Action Dude” has a rating value of 1. The rating type of “Action Dude” is “explicit” because the user explicitly classified “Action Dude,” as described above in connection with FIG. 8. The in cache indicator indicates that “Action Dude” is presently locally stored by the client system. The next treatment indicator indicates replace because the user has already watched “Action Dude.”


In one embodiment, the rating values in content rating table 701 are determined as follows. Meta-data 501 shows that “Action Dude” has the attribute values “Joe Smith” and “action.” Meta-data table 601 of FIG. 10 shows that “Joe Smith” has a relevance value of 1 and a believability factor of 1. Meta-data table 601 of FIG. 10 also shows that “action” has a relevance value of 1 and a believability factor of 1. In one embodiment, the rating value of a particular data file is determined considering all of the relevance values combined with their respective believability factors for all the attribute values of the data file. For instance, in one embodiment, the rating value for a data file is equal to the average of all of products of each relevance value and corresponding believability factor for the attribute values of the data file.


To illustrate, referring to “Action Dude” in content rating table 701 of FIG. 11, the product of the relevance value and believability factor of “Joe Smith” is 1*1, which equals 1. The product of the relevance value and believability factor of “action” is 1*1, which equals 1. The average of the products, 1 and 1, is 1. Therefore, the rating of “Action Dude” in content rating table 701 of FIG. 11 is 1.


Similarly, with regard to “Blast 'Em” in content rating table 701, “Blast 'Em” has the attribute values “Jane Doe” and “action.” The relevance value and believability factors for “Jane Doe” in meta-data table 601 of FIG. 10 are −1 and 0, respectively. Thus, the rating of “Blast 'Em” in content rating table 701 is the average of 1*0 and 1*1, which equals 0.5. The ratings for “The Funny Show” and “Hardy Har Har” in content rating table 701 in the example shown in FIG. 11 are determined in a similar fashion in one embodiment of the present invention.


It is noted that since the user classified the movies “Action Dude” and “The Funny Show” above in FIG. 8, these movies have an explicit rating type as shown in content rating table 701 of FIG. 11. Since the user did not classify the movies “Blast 'Em” and “Hardy Har Har,” these movies have an implicit rating in content rating table 701.


It is appreciated that the discussion above provides one example of how the rating values in content rating table 701 are determined in accordance with the teachings of the present invention. It is noted that ratings values may be determined in other ways in accordance with the teachings of the invention, which consider the relevance values and believability factors for each of the attribute values of a data file.


In one embodiment, the entry for next treatment in content rating table 701 is determined in part by the rating and in cache values for the particular data file. For example, assume in one embodiment that a rating of greater than zero indicates that the user is predicted to have at least some interest in that particular movie. Therefore, the movies “Blast 'Em” and “Hardy Har Har” may be of some interest to the user. Thus, the next treatment indicates that the movie “Blast 'Em” will be kept in storage and the movie “Hardy Har Har” will be captured when it is later broadcast by the server. As mentioned above, the movie “Action Dude” is marked for replacement in the next treatment field because it has already been watched by the user.


In one embodiment, future interactions by a user with the client system results in similar processing as described above. For instance, assume that the user now watches the movie “Blast 'Em.” In this particular example, the user did not classify the movie “Blast 'Em” before watching the movie. In one embodiment, both of the relevance values and believability factors are updated for the attribute values of unclassified data files that are accessed, as shown in meta-data table 601 of FIG. 12. Recall from FIG. 5 that the movie “Blast 'Em” features “Jane Doe” and is an “action” movie. As shown in FIG. 10, the relevance value of “Jane Doe” was less than zero, or −1, prior to the user watching “Blast 'Em.” Nevertheless, in this example, the user watched “Blast 'Em,” despite the fact that it featured actress “Jane Doe.” Accordingly, the believability factor of the “Jane Doe” attribute the value is adjusted downward since this particular attribute value now appears less likely or relevant when predicting a user's viewing habits. In one embodiment, since the relevance value is already less than zero, the believability factor is not adjusted further downward. However, the relevance value and believability factor for the attribute value “action” are adjusted upwards since “action” had a relevance value of greater than zero prior to the user watching “Blast 'Em.” Thus, in this example, the relevance value is adjusted upwards from 1 to 2 and the believability factor is also adjusted upwards from 1 to 2. Therefore, the content rating table 601 of FIG. 12 now predicts that “action” movies are movies that the user is more likely to watch.


In one embodiment, each time the user interacts with the client system, the meta-data table 601 and the content rating table 701 are updated. Updates to be meta-data table 601 and content rating table 71 are performed when the user accesses data files as well as when the user explicitly classifies data files. It is appreciated that the user is not required to classify data files explicitly in order for the meta-data table 601 and content rating table 701 to be updated in accordance with the teachings of the present invention. As a result, the content rating table over time will more accurately predict data files in which the user is interested.


In one embodiment, the data files in which the user is predicted implicitly to be most interested as well as the data files in which the user explicitly classified an interest will be the data files that are cache locally on the client system. In effect, the television programs and movies that the user is most likely to want to watch are automatically stored locally, and therefore available “on demand,” in accordance with teachings of the present invention without the user having to explicitly request these television programs and movies in advance or explicitly specify criteria used to identify the movies. Moreover, these data files can be automatically selected and displayed on the personalized channel 214 on the display device 219 to the user, as will be discussed.


As can be appreciated, by storing the data files locally on each client, broadcast bandwidth is utilized more efficiently in accordance with teachings of the present invention. Indeed, when a user watches a movie from the local storage of the client, no additional broadcast bandwidth is utilized. In addition, it is also appreciated that a substantial amount of the processing performed in a system according to the teachings of the present invention is performed on each of the client systems when updating their respective meta-data tables and content rating tables. This distributed processing of the present invention enables the presently disclosed broadcast system to scale across a very large number of users since the incremental cost to the server for each additional client is zero.


In another embodiment, ratings values such as for example those generated in the content rating tables maintained and updated by client systems of the present invention may be used to determine broadcast content and schedules of a server in accordance with teachings of the present invention. For instance, assume a broadcast system such as for example the one described above in FIG. 1B. As shown in the depicted embodiment, server 103 broadcasts information to a plurality of clients 105, 107 and 109. In the depicted embodiment, each client 105, 107 and 109 also includes a communications link 121, 123 and 125, respectively, back to server 103. In one embodiment, the communications links 121, 123 and 125 are used by server 103 to receive ratings from each client 105, 107 and 109, respectively. In one embodiment, the ratings received from each client are generated in a manner similar to that discussed above. In one embodiment, server 103 includes processing that aggregates the ratings received from each client and is therefore able to identify the most highly rated data files. In one embodiment, server 103 then broadcasts the most highly rated data files. In one embodiment, the order or time in which server 103 broadcasts the data files is determined at least in part by the aggregated ratings received from each of the clients.


In one particular embodiment of the present invention, a method, apparatus, and machine-readable medium for automatically delivering data files (e.g. television and movies) via a personalized channel 214 to the user, that are based on a user's profile and viewing habits, are provided. The personalized channel 214 is displayed on a display device 219 to the user. This enables a passive viewing experience for the end-user. The user only needs to tune to his or her personalized channel (e.g. channel 99) to view personalized content synthesized from all of available content sources available to the user.


For example, in one embodiment, a client 201 (e.g. a set-top box, personal computer etc.) receives meta-data broadcasts from a server system that includes descriptions of a plurality of data files currently being broadcasted or to be broadcast by the server system. As an illustration, meta-data can be included as part of an Electronic Program Guide (EPG) or an Expended Program Information Signal (EPI). In response to a content rating table that is based on a user's profile and viewing habits, a data file is automatically selected for the user. As previously discussed, data files are rated in response to a content rating table and meta-data tables. The data file can be selected based upon the ratings and/or relevance of the data file in relation to the content rating table. Particularly, the data file with the highest rating is automatically selected. The automatically selected data file is displayed on the personalized channel 214 on a display device 219 to the user, when the user picks or tunes to the personalized channel (e.g. channel 99).


The selected data file can be, for example, a currently broadcasting data file or a data file stored in a cache memory (e.g. memory 205, storage 211, etc.) of the client 201. As previously discussed, data files can be stored in cache memory for the user. The stored data files are selected based upon their ratings and the data file is stored in a cache memory to thereby create a stored data file. In one embodiment, the client 201 compares the ratings of the currently broadcasting data files and the stored data files, and based upon the ratings, the highest rated currently broadcasting data file or stored data file is automatically selected for display on the personalized channel 214. Thus, the client 201 can stream data files (e.g. television and movies) tailored to the individual user's tastes from live and captured content on the personalized channel 214 to the display device 219 for viewing by the user, with no user interaction required, except to pick the personalized channel. Moreover, targeted advertisements based on user preferences can be shown on the personalized channel 214 to the user.



FIG. 13 is a flow diagram illustrating one embodiment of a process 1300 for selecting and displaying a data file on a personalized channel. The process 1300 can be implemented by the client 201 to display the personalized channel 214 (e.g. channel 99) on the display device 219, as previously discussed.


At block 1310, the client 201 receives meta-data for data files currently being broadcasted and to be broadcast from the server 103. Next, at block 1320, the client 201 (e.g. utilizing a processor 203) performs processing (e.g. including relevance or preference processing) to rate data files in response to a content rating table, as previously discussed. At block 1330, the ratings of the currently broadcasted data files and the stored data files are compared. The currently broadcasted data file or the stored data file with the highest rating is then automatically selected (block 1340). The selected data file is then displayed on a personalized channel 214 for display on a display device 219 to the user, when the user picks or tunes to the personalized channel (e.g. channel 99).



FIG. 14 is a flow diagram illustrating another, more detailed, embodiment of a process 1400 for selecting and displaying a data file on a personalized channel. The process 1400 can be implemented by the client 201 to display the personalized channel 214 (e.g. channel 99) on the display device 219, as previously discussed.


At block 1402, the client 201 (e.g. utilizing a processor 203) processes incoming non-real time data files and meta-data, at a time prior to the current broadcast time (e.g. including relevance or preference processing) to rate data files in response to a content rating table, as previously discussed. If the meta-data associated with a data file achieves a moderate threshold rating then the data file and the meta-data is automatically selected for potential viewing on the personalized channel 214 and is cached or stored in memory (e.g. memory 205 or storage 211) at process block 1406. At block 1407, the stored data file is processed as a best stored data file option and is forwarded to decision block 1420. Generally, the best stored data file option satisfies a moderate threshold, e.g. a user is likely to enjoy the content. If the meta-data associated with a data file does not achieve a moderate threshold rating then the data file and meta-data is automatically discarded at block 1408. Moreover, the process 1400 may delete cached data files based on size, relevance based on time, e.g. news vs. movies, etc.


At block 1410, the client 201 (e.g. utilizing a processor 203) processes incoming real time data files and meta-data (e.g. including relevance or preference processing) to rate data files in response to a content rating table, as previously discussed. If the meta-data associated with the data file achieves a sufficiently high threshold rating, the data file is designated as an immediate viewing data file and is automatically forwarded to decision block 1420. For example, immediate viewing data files have very high threshold ratings based on the content rating table, e.g. a user always watches Monday Night Football at 8:00 PM. Therefore, the personalized channel 214 will almost always display this data file at 8:00 pm on Monday nights. On the other hand, if the meta-data associated with the data file does not achieve a sufficiently high threshold rating, the data file is sent to decision block 1402 for caching consideration, as previously discussed.


At block 1415, the client 201 (e.g. utilizing a processor 203) processes incoming real time data files and meta-data (e.g. including relevance or preference processing) to determine a best current data file option. The best current data file option is forwarded to decision block 1420. The best current data file is the best guess of the process 1400 as to which data file the user would likely want to view notwithstanding any highly relevant immediate viewing data files or moderately relevant stored data files.


At decision block 1420, one of the immediate viewing data file, the stored data file, or the best current data file option is selected. In one embodiment, the immediate viewing data file is given priority over the stored data file and the stored data file is given priority over the best current data file option. Thus, if the immediate viewing data file is available, it is automatically selected for display on the personalized channel 214 on the display device 219 (block 1422). However, if the immediate viewing data file is not available, and a best stored data file option is available, then the best stored data file option is automatically selected for display on the personalized channel 214 on the display device 219 (block 1422). If neither an immediate viewing data file or a best stored data file option is available, then the best current data file option is automatically selected for display on the personalized channel 214 on the display device 219 (block 1422). Thus, the client 201 can stream data files (e.g. television and movies) tailored to the individual's tastes from live and captured content on the personalized channel 214 to the display device 219, with no user interaction required, except to tune to the personalized channel (e.g. channel 99).


The embodiments of the present invention and their various functional components can be implemented in hardware, software, firmware, middleware or a combination thereof and utilized in systems, subsystems, components, or sub-components thereof. When implemented in software, these embodiments are the instructions/code segments to perform the necessary tasks. The program or code segments can be stored in a machine readable medium, such as a processor readable medium or a computer program product, or transmitted by a computer data signal embodied in a carrier wave, or a signal modulated by a carrier, over a transmission medium or communication link. The machine-readable medium or processor-readable medium may include any medium that can store or transfer information in a form readable and executable by a machine (e.g. a client, a processor, a computer, etc.). Examples of the machine/processor-readable medium include an electronic circuit, a semiconductor memory device, a ROM, a flash memory, an erasable programmable ROM (EPROM), a floppy diskette, CD-ROM, an optical disk, a hard disk, a fiber optic medium, a radio frequency (RF) link, etc. The computer data signal may include any signal that can propagate over a transmission medium such as electronic network channels, optical fibers, air, electromagnetic, RF links, etc. The code segments may be downloaded via computer networks such as the Internet, Intranet, etc.


In the foregoing detailed description, the method and apparatus of the present invention have been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments thereof. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the present invention. The present specification and figures are accordingly to be regarded as illustrative rather than restrictive.

Claims
  • 1. A method implemented by a client terminal, comprising: receiving meta-data broadcast from a server system at the client terminal, the meta-data including descriptions of a plurality of programs currently being broadcasted by the server system;rating previously broadcasted programs based on meta-data associated with the previously broadcasted programs, respectively, at the client terminal, in response to a content rating table, wherein the content rating table includes at least a rating value and a rating type for broadcasted programs, wherein the rating value is the combination of a relevance value and a believability factor, the relevance value corresponding to a likelihood that a user will want to watch the previously broadcasted program based on the descriptions of the meta-data and the believability factor is a weighting factor corresponding to the accuracy of past relevance value determinations, and the rating type indicates whether the rating value was generated explicitly based upon prior explicit input from the user or implicitly generated without prior explicit input from the user;storing previously broadcasted programs meeting a pre-determined ranking threshold in a storage device at the client terminal to create a plurality of stored previously broadcast programs;comparing the rankings of the plurality of stored previously broadcast programs to determine a best stored program at the client terminal;rating currently broadcasted programs being received at the client terminal in response to the content rating table;comparing the rankings of currently broadcasted programs to determine a best currently broadcasted program at the client terminal;comparing the rankings of the best currently broadcasted program and the best stored program at the client terminal;selecting either the best currently broadcasted program or the best stored program determined to have the highest ranking; anddisplaying the selected best currently broadcasted program or the best stored program automatically on a personalized channel on a display device.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the best currently broadcasted program is automatically selected.
  • 3. The method of claim 2 wherein if neither a best currently broadcasted data file or a best stored program is selected then the currently broadcasted program with the highest ranking is selected.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 wherein the meta-data comprise at least one of video information, graphical information, audio information, multi-media information or textual information.
  • 5. A client terminal, comprising: a processor having circuitry to execute instructions;a communications interface coupled to the processor, the communications interface coupled to receive programs currently being broadcasted and meta-data from a server system; anda storage device coupled to the processor, the storage device having sequences of instructions stored therein, which when executed by the processor cause the processor to:rate previously broadcasted programs based on meta-data associated with the previously broadcasted programs, respectively, in response to a content rating table, wherein the content rating table includes at least a rating value and a rating type for broadcasted programs, wherein the rating value is the combination of a relevance value and a believability factor, the relevance value corresponding to a likelihood that a user will want to watch the previously broadcasted program based on the descriptions of the meta-data and the believability factor is a weighting factor corresponding to the accuracy of past relevance value determinations, and the rating type indicates whether the rating value was generated explicitly based upon prior explicit input from the user or implicitly generated without prior explicit input from the user;store previously broadcasted programs meeting a pre-determined ranking threshold in the storage device to create a plurality of stored previously broadcast programs;compare the rankings of the plurality of stored previously broadcast programs to determine a best stored program;rate currently broadcasted programs being received at the client terminal in response to the content rating table;compare the rankings of currently broadcasted programs to determine a best currently broadcasted program;compare the rankings of the best currently broadcasted program and the best stored program at the client terminal;select either the best currently broadcasted program or the best stored program determined to have the highest ranking; anddisplay the selected best currently broadcasted program or the best stored program automatically on a personalized channel on a display device.
  • 6. The apparatus of claim 5 wherein the best currently broadcasted program is automatically selected.
  • 7. The apparatus of claim 6 wherein if neither a best currently broadcasted program or a best stored program is selected then the currently broadcasted program with the highest ranking is selected.
  • 8. The apparatus of claim 5 wherein the meta-data comprise at least one of video information, graphical information, audio information, multi-media information or textual information.
  • 9. A machine-readable non-transitory medium of a storage device having instructions tangibly stored thereon executed by a processor of a client terminal to cause the processor to: receive meta-data broadcast from a server system at the client terminal, the meta-data including descriptions of a plurality of programs currently being broadcasted by the server system;rate previously broadcasted programs based on meta-data associated with the previously broadcasted programs, respectively, in response to a content rating table, wherein the content rating table includes at least a rating value and a rating type for broadcasted programs, wherein the rating value is the combination of a relevance value and a believability factor, the relevance value corresponding to a likelihood that a user will want to watch the previously broadcasted program based on the descriptions of the meta-data and the believability factor is a weighting factor corresponding to the accuracy of past relevance value determinations, and the rating type indicates whether the rating value was generated explicitly based upon prior explicit input from the user or implicitly generated without prior explicit input from the user;store previously broadcasted programs meeting a pre-determined ranking threshold in a storage device at the client terminal to create a plurality of stored previously broadcast programs;compare the rankings of the plurality of stored previously broadcast programs to determine a best stored program;rate currently broadcasted programs being received at the client terminal in response to the content rating table;compare the rankings of currently broadcasted programs to determine a best currently broadcasted program;compare the rankings of the best currently broadcasted program and the best stored program;select either the best currently broadcasted program or the best stored program determined to have the highest ranking; anddisplay the selected best currently broadcasted program or the best stored program automatically on a personalized channel on a display device.
  • 10. The machine-readable non-transitory medium of claim 9 wherein the best currently broadcasted program is automatically selected.
  • 11. The machine-readable non-transitory medium of claim 10 wherein if neither a best currently broadcast program or a best stored program is selected then the currently broadcasted program with the highest ranking is selected.
CROSS REFERENCES TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 09/966,676 filed on Sep. 28, 2001 now abandoned.

US Referenced Citations (373)
Number Name Date Kind
4115855 Chiba Sep 1978 A
4546382 McKenna et al. Oct 1985 A
4566030 Nickerson et al. Jan 1986 A
4602279 Freeman Jul 1986 A
4624578 Green Nov 1986 A
4646145 Percy et al. Feb 1987 A
4695879 Weinblatt Sep 1987 A
5075771 Hashimoto Dec 1991 A
5155591 Wachob Oct 1992 A
5175836 Morgan Dec 1992 A
5227874 Von Kohorn Jul 1993 A
5303234 Kou Apr 1994 A
5357276 Banker et al. Oct 1994 A
5388211 Hornbuckle Feb 1995 A
5392223 Caci Feb 1995 A
5408465 Gusella et al. Apr 1995 A
5410272 Haberland et al. Apr 1995 A
5410344 Graves et al. Apr 1995 A
5426513 Scorse et al. Jun 1995 A
5444499 Saitoh Aug 1995 A
5446919 Wilkins Aug 1995 A
5457808 Osawa et al. Oct 1995 A
5483278 Strubbe et al. Jan 1996 A
5483529 Baggen et al. Jan 1996 A
5517254 Monta et al. May 1996 A
5530082 Friebe et al. Jun 1996 A
5530965 Kawasaki Jun 1996 A
5534911 Levitan Jul 1996 A
5541638 Story Jul 1996 A
5544161 Bigham et al. Aug 1996 A
5550928 Lu et al. Aug 1996 A
5559549 Hendricks et al. Sep 1996 A
5563895 Malkamaki et al. Oct 1996 A
5564088 Saitoh Oct 1996 A
5566174 Sato et al. Oct 1996 A
5568181 Greenwood et al. Oct 1996 A
5574509 Citta et al. Nov 1996 A
5583561 Baker et al. Dec 1996 A
5583576 Perlman et al. Dec 1996 A
5585838 Lawler et al. Dec 1996 A
5594490 Dawson et al. Jan 1997 A
5600364 Hendricks et al. Feb 1997 A
5600573 Hendricks et al. Feb 1997 A
5600606 Rao Feb 1997 A
5619247 Russo Apr 1997 A
5619249 Billock et al. Apr 1997 A
5648824 Dunn et al. Jul 1997 A
5652870 Yamasaki et al. Jul 1997 A
5654747 Ottesen et al. Aug 1997 A
5664091 Keen Sep 1997 A
5666293 Metz et al. Sep 1997 A
5680322 Shinoda Oct 1997 A
5686954 Yoshinobu et al. Nov 1997 A
5689439 Weerackody et al. Nov 1997 A
5701599 Aihara Dec 1997 A
5717814 Abecassis Feb 1998 A
5717923 Dedrick Feb 1998 A
5724345 Guarneri et al. Mar 1998 A
5724543 Ozden et al. Mar 1998 A
5727002 Miller et al. Mar 1998 A
5732282 Provino et al. Mar 1998 A
5734890 Case et al. Mar 1998 A
5740549 Reilly et al. Apr 1998 A
5751282 Girard et al. May 1998 A
5752160 Dunn May 1998 A
5754938 Herz et al. May 1998 A
5758257 Herz et al. May 1998 A
5758259 Lawler May 1998 A
5768681 Dan et al. Jun 1998 A
5778182 Cathey et al. Jul 1998 A
5790170 Suzuki Aug 1998 A
5790935 Payton Aug 1998 A
5801747 Bedard Sep 1998 A
5801753 Eyer et al. Sep 1998 A
5815662 Ong Sep 1998 A
5838668 Okada et al. Nov 1998 A
5838678 Davis et al. Nov 1998 A
5842199 Miller et al. Nov 1998 A
5845090 Collins et al. Dec 1998 A
5848396 Gerace Dec 1998 A
5867226 Wehmeyer et al. Feb 1999 A
5867799 Lang et al. Feb 1999 A
5872588 Aras et al. Feb 1999 A
5897608 Yokoyama et al. Apr 1999 A
5903314 Niijima et al. May 1999 A
5905713 Anderson et al. May 1999 A
5918002 Klemets et al. Jun 1999 A
5918022 Batz et al. Jun 1999 A
5920642 Merjanian Jul 1999 A
5920700 Gordon et al. Jul 1999 A
5926230 Niijima et al. Jul 1999 A
5928330 Goetz et al. Jul 1999 A
5930493 Ottesen et al. Jul 1999 A
5937411 Becker Aug 1999 A
5940073 Klosterman et al. Aug 1999 A
5940738 Rao Aug 1999 A
5945988 Williams et al. Aug 1999 A
5963551 Minko Oct 1999 A
5973683 Cragun et al. Oct 1999 A
5974398 Hanson et al. Oct 1999 A
5977964 Williams et al. Nov 1999 A
5978381 Perlman et al. Nov 1999 A
5983214 Lang et al. Nov 1999 A
5991735 Gerace Nov 1999 A
5991841 Gafken et al. Nov 1999 A
5999526 Garland et al. Dec 1999 A
5999908 Abelow Dec 1999 A
6002393 Hite et al. Dec 1999 A
6002852 Birdwell et al. Dec 1999 A
6005597 Barrett et al. Dec 1999 A
6006247 Browning et al. Dec 1999 A
6012051 Sammon, Jr. Jan 2000 A
6018359 Kermode et al. Jan 2000 A
6018768 Ullman et al. Jan 2000 A
6020883 Herz et al. Feb 2000 A
6021433 Payne et al. Feb 2000 A
6025868 Russo Feb 2000 A
6028685 Caridi et al. Feb 2000 A
6029045 Picco et al. Feb 2000 A
6029176 Cannon Feb 2000 A
6055560 Mills et al. Apr 2000 A
6057872 Candelore May 2000 A
6067564 Urakoshi et al. May 2000 A
6075971 Williams et al. Jun 2000 A
6085252 Zhu et al. Jul 2000 A
6085253 Blackwell et al. Jul 2000 A
6088722 Herz et al. Jul 2000 A
6108645 Eichstaedt et al. Aug 2000 A
6114376 Prichard et al. Sep 2000 A
6118492 Milnes Sep 2000 A
6119189 Gafken et al. Sep 2000 A
6125259 Perlman Sep 2000 A
6131127 Gafken et al. Oct 2000 A
6141785 Hur et al. Oct 2000 A
6144376 Connelly Nov 2000 A
6148005 Paul et al. Nov 2000 A
6160989 Hendricks et al. Dec 2000 A
6163316 Killian Dec 2000 A
6169570 Suzuki Jan 2001 B1
6177931 Alexander et al. Jan 2001 B1
6184918 Goldschmidt Iki et al. Feb 2001 B1
6185360 Inoue et al. Feb 2001 B1
6215776 Chao Apr 2001 B1
6226618 Downs May 2001 B1
6233283 Chiu et al. May 2001 B1
6236395 Sezan et al. May 2001 B1
6240553 Son et al. May 2001 B1
6271893 Kawaguchi et al. Aug 2001 B1
6279040 Ma et al. Aug 2001 B1
6289012 Harrington et al. Sep 2001 B1
6289510 Nakajima Sep 2001 B1
6298482 Seidman et al. Oct 2001 B1
6304578 Fluss Oct 2001 B1
6317881 Shah-Nazaroff et al. Nov 2001 B1
6320850 Perahia et al. Nov 2001 B1
6324182 Burns et al. Nov 2001 B1
6324338 Wood et al. Nov 2001 B1
6349321 Katayama Feb 2002 B1
6357028 Zhu Mar 2002 B1
6357042 Srinivasan et al. Mar 2002 B2
6359557 Bilder Mar 2002 B2
6359571 Endo et al. Mar 2002 B1
6374405 Willard Apr 2002 B1
6378036 Lerman et al. Apr 2002 B2
6389593 Yamagishi May 2002 B1
6397387 Rosin et al. May 2002 B1
6424625 Larsson et al. Jul 2002 B1
6430608 Shaio Aug 2002 B1
6434747 Khoo et al. Aug 2002 B1
6438579 Hosken Aug 2002 B1
6438585 Mousseau et al. Aug 2002 B2
6445398 Gerba et al. Sep 2002 B1
6449632 David et al. Sep 2002 B1
6449654 Blackwell et al. Sep 2002 B1
6457010 Eldering et al. Sep 2002 B1
6459427 Mao et al. Oct 2002 B1
6460036 Herz et al. Oct 2002 B1
6463585 Hendricks et al. Oct 2002 B1
6467089 Aust et al. Oct 2002 B1
6477704 Cremia Nov 2002 B1
6480783 Myr Nov 2002 B1
6481011 Lemmons Nov 2002 B1
6490722 Barton et al. Dec 2002 B1
6513014 Walker et al. Jan 2003 B1
6513069 Abato et al. Jan 2003 B1
6515964 Cheung et al. Feb 2003 B1
6516192 Spaur et al. Feb 2003 B1
6519571 Guheen et al. Feb 2003 B1
6526455 Kamimura Feb 2003 B1
6526575 McCoy et al. Feb 2003 B1
6529526 Schneidewend Mar 2003 B1
6530082 Del Sesto Mar 2003 B1
6557042 He et al. Apr 2003 B1
6563515 Reynolds et al. May 2003 B1
6564381 Hodge et al. May 2003 B1
6570843 Wolfgang May 2003 B1
6571389 Spyker et al. May 2003 B1
6574518 Lounsberry et al. Jun 2003 B1
6577599 Gupta et al. Jun 2003 B1
6578199 Tsou et al. Jun 2003 B1
6580452 Gangitano Jun 2003 B1
6587985 Fukushima et al. Jul 2003 B1
6594682 Peterson et al. Jul 2003 B2
6594699 Sahai et al. Jul 2003 B1
6601103 Goldschmidt Iki et al. Jul 2003 B1
6601234 Bowman-Amuah Jul 2003 B1
6601237 Ten Kate et al. Jul 2003 B1
6611842 Brown Aug 2003 B1
6614987 Ismail et al. Sep 2003 B1
6617980 Endo et al. Sep 2003 B2
6625716 Fackenthal Sep 2003 B2
6637029 Maissel et al. Oct 2003 B1
6642862 Boudry Nov 2003 B2
6642939 Vallone et al. Nov 2003 B1
6643322 Varma et al. Nov 2003 B1
6647411 Towell et al. Nov 2003 B2
6662330 Hershey Dec 2003 B1
6665655 Warner et al. Dec 2003 B1
6668246 Yeung et al. Dec 2003 B1
6668377 Dunn Dec 2003 B1
6671323 Tahara Dec 2003 B1
6678890 Cai Jan 2004 B1
6681393 Bauminger Jan 2004 B1
6700893 Radha et al. Mar 2004 B1
6701528 Arsenault et al. Mar 2004 B1
6704929 Ozer et al. Mar 2004 B1
6715004 Grimsrud et al. Mar 2004 B1
6718551 Swix et al. Apr 2004 B1
6718552 Goode Apr 2004 B1
6721713 Guheen et al. Apr 2004 B1
6721954 Nickum Apr 2004 B1
6728966 Arsenault et al. Apr 2004 B1
6751401 Arai et al. Jun 2004 B1
6763523 Sacilotto, Jr. et al. Jul 2004 B1
6772209 Chernock et al. Aug 2004 B1
6782370 Stack Aug 2004 B1
6782476 Ishibashi Aug 2004 B1
6792412 Sullivan et al. Sep 2004 B1
6792470 Hakenberg et al. Sep 2004 B2
6801936 Diwan Oct 2004 B1
6842461 Harris Jan 2005 B2
6850559 Driessen et al. Feb 2005 B1
6865746 Herrington et al. Mar 2005 B1
6868551 Lawler et al. Mar 2005 B1
6883176 Grooters Apr 2005 B1
6898762 Ellis et al. May 2005 B2
6898800 Son et al. May 2005 B2
6922844 Arsenault et al. Jul 2005 B1
6923911 Beier et al. Aug 2005 B1
6928655 Omoigui Aug 2005 B1
6931657 Marsh Aug 2005 B1
6934964 Schaffer et al. Aug 2005 B1
6947935 Horvitz et al. Sep 2005 B1
6950604 Kato et al. Sep 2005 B1
6973662 Sie et al. Dec 2005 B1
6990635 Kurapati et al. Jan 2006 B2
6990676 Proehl et al. Jan 2006 B1
7007294 Kurapati Feb 2006 B1
7013478 Hendricks et al. Mar 2006 B1
7017189 DeMello et al. Mar 2006 B1
7020189 Sweitzer et al. Mar 2006 B2
7024679 Sie et al. Apr 2006 B1
7024681 Fransman et al. Apr 2006 B1
7028071 Slik Apr 2006 B1
7028220 Park Apr 2006 B2
7035871 Hunt et al. Apr 2006 B2
7036137 Arsenault et al. Apr 2006 B1
7047456 Jutzi May 2006 B2
7051352 Schaffer May 2006 B1
7055165 Connelly May 2006 B2
7055168 Errico et al. May 2006 B1
7058027 Alessi et al. Jun 2006 B1
7065709 Ellis et al. Jun 2006 B2
7072932 Stahl Jul 2006 B1
7093295 Saito Aug 2006 B1
7096486 Ukai et al. Aug 2006 B1
7107271 Aoki et al. Sep 2006 B2
7114170 Harris et al. Sep 2006 B2
7117518 Takahashi et al. Oct 2006 B1
7167895 Connelly Jan 2007 B1
7185355 Ellis et al. Feb 2007 B1
7231652 Gutta et al. Jun 2007 B2
7380262 Wang et al. May 2008 B2
20010003828 Peterson et al. Jun 2001 A1
20010012299 Dahlen Aug 2001 A1
20010013127 Tomita et al. Aug 2001 A1
20010024239 Feder Sep 2001 A1
20010037507 Mori Nov 2001 A1
20010047516 Swain et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020011988 Sai et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020026496 Boyer et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020042923 Asmussen et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020047902 Thomas et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020056118 Hunter et al. May 2002 A1
20020059394 Sanders May 2002 A1
20020073245 Hallford Jun 2002 A1
20020087969 Brunheroto et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020100046 Dudkiewicz Jul 2002 A1
20020104087 Schaffer et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020104095 Nguyen et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020112235 Ballou et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020124252 Schaefer et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020129375 Kim et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020138733 Ishibashi et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020143591 Connelly Oct 2002 A1
20020143607 Connelly Oct 2002 A1
20020144265 Connelly Oct 2002 A1
20020144269 Connelly Oct 2002 A1
20020145052 Cessac Oct 2002 A1
20020152463 Dudkiewicz Oct 2002 A1
20020152474 Dudkiewicz Oct 2002 A1
20020156783 Schwartz et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020156912 Hurst et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020157103 Song et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020162120 Mitchell Oct 2002 A1
20020162121 Mitchell Oct 2002 A1
20020166269 Merkli Nov 2002 A1
20020167947 Hallford et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020174430 Ellis et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020188944 Noble Dec 2002 A1
20020193066 Connelly Dec 2002 A1
20020194585 Connelly Dec 2002 A1
20020194603 Connelly Dec 2002 A1
20020199186 Ali et al. Dec 2002 A1
20020199194 Ali Dec 2002 A1
20030004955 Cedola et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030005311 Kajimura et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030005438 Crinon et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030005441 Inoue Jan 2003 A1
20030005451 Connelly Jan 2003 A1
20030005465 Connelly Jan 2003 A1
20030016673 Pendakur et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030046633 Jutzi Mar 2003 A1
20030046683 Jutzi Mar 2003 A1
20030050929 Bookman et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030051240 Schaffer et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030056216 Wugofski et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030058933 Jutzi Mar 2003 A1
20030061206 Qian Mar 2003 A1
20030061611 Pendakur Mar 2003 A1
20030065520 Jutzi Apr 2003 A1
20030066090 Traw et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030074664 Kwoh Apr 2003 A1
20030083951 Connelly May 2003 A1
20030093792 Labeeb et al. May 2003 A1
20030097657 Zhou et al. May 2003 A1
20030103532 Bertram et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030110499 Knudson et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030135553 Pendakur Jul 2003 A1
20030135857 Pendakur et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030149988 Ellis et al. Aug 2003 A1
20040002896 Alanen et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040003403 Marsh Jan 2004 A1
20040117831 Ellis et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040123323 Russo Jun 2004 A1
20040163014 Correa Aug 2004 A1
20040194146 Bates et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040221307 Arai et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040226042 Ellis Nov 2004 A1
20050027382 Kirmse et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050028208 Ellis et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050149964 Thomas et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050155063 Bayrakeri et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050193414 Horvitz et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050204387 Knudson et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050204388 Knudson et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050262542 DeWeese et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050273832 Zigmond et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050283800 Ellis et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060031882 Swix et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060190966 McKissick et al. Aug 2006 A1
20080046930 Smith et al. Feb 2008 A1
20100017824 Malik Jan 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (37)
Number Date Country
0064168 Nov 1982 EP
0902569 Mar 1999 EP
0905631 Mar 1999 EP
1028511 Aug 2000 EP
1043892 Oct 2000 EP
1089201 Apr 2001 EP
1089571 Apr 2001 EP
1089572 Apr 2001 EP
2001101190 Apr 2001 JP
20011011190 Apr 2001 JP
2001290727 Oct 2001 JP
2003032710 Jan 2003 JP
WO9102311 Feb 1991 WO
WO9102311 Feb 1991 WO
WO9726729 Jul 1997 WO
WO9944159 Sep 1999 WO
WO9965237 Dec 1999 WO
WO0001149 Jan 2000 WO
WO0027124 May 2000 WO
WO0040028 Jul 2000 WO
WO0059204 Oct 2000 WO
WO0064165 Oct 2000 WO
WO0064168 Oct 2000 WO
WO0105449 Mar 2001 WO
WO0115451 Mar 2001 WO
WO0117195 Mar 2001 WO
WO0137123 May 2001 WO
WO172042 Sep 2001 WO
WO0193524 Dec 2001 WO
WO0248863 Jun 2002 WO
WO02103940 Dec 2002 WO
WO02103941 Dec 2002 WO
WO02104030 Dec 2002 WO
WO02104031 Dec 2002 WO
WO03028381 Apr 2003 WO
WO03030540 Apr 2003 WO
WO03061245 Jul 2003 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (65)
Entry
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/966,676 mailed Aug. 23, 2006, 11 pages.
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/966,676 mailed Mar. 2, 2007, 13 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/532,034, Connelly, Jay H.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/533,034, Connelly, Jay H.
U.S. Appl. No. 09/717,579, Jutzi, Curtis E.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/823,566”, U.S. Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 09/823,566, (Oct. 23, 2006), 1-8.
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/895,433”, U.S. Office Action, (Jun. 1, 2007), 8 pages.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/044,544”, U.S. Office action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/044,544, (Oct. 18, 2006), 27 pp.
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/044,546”, U.S. Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/044,546, (Nov. 15, 2006), 1-23.
“Internet and Broadcast; the Key to Digital Convergence”, Intel DeveloperUPDATEMagazine, (May 2000), pp. 1-3.
“Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/882,091, mailed Nov. 26, 2007 (34 pp)”.
“Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/882,205, mailed Aug. 29, 2007 (21 pp)”.
“Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/882,205, mailed Dec. 13, 2007 (18 pp)”.
“Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/966,676, mailed Feb. 21, 2008 (17 pp)”.
“Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/966,676, mailed Sep. 10, 2007 (34 pp)”.
“Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/043,918, mailed Oct. 2, 2007 (23 pp)”.
“PCT International Search Report”, PCT/US01/43862 (Dec. 4, 2003), 1-4.
“PCT International Search Report”, PCT/US02/17270, (Jun. 3, 2003), 1-4.
“PCT International Search Report”, PCT/US02/17381 (Oct. 20, 2003), 1-6.
“PCT International Search Report”, PCT/US02/17316 (Nov. 6, 2002), 1-8.
“PCT International Search Report”, PCT/US02/29091, (Apr. 3, 2003), 1-5.
“PCT International Search Report”, PCT/US02/29099 (Mar. 28, 2003), 1-4.
“PCT International Search Report”, PCT/US03/001694 (Jun. 2, 2003), 1-4.
Advanced Television Systems Comm, “Program and System Information Protocol for Terrestrial Broadcast and Cable (Revision A) and Amendment No. 1”, Advanced Television Systems Committee Doc. A/65A, Dec. 23, 1997, Rev. A pp. a-e and pp. 1-135, (May 31, 2000), pp. a-e & 1-135.
Anonymous, “Set-top box offer new possibilities for broadcaster”, Proquest, Broadcast Engineering, Overland Park. vol. 41, Issue 7., (Jun. 1999), pp. 1-2.
Blundon, William , “When Push comes to Shove”, Blundons Corner, (Apr. 1997), pp. 1-4.
Business Wire, “MessageMedia Launches Support View”, (Nov. 18, 1999), 1-2.
Cisco.Com, “Internet Protocol (IP) Mutlicast Technology Overview”, http://.www.cisco.com/warp/—public/cc/pd/iosw/tech/ipmu—ov/htm, Whitepaper Cisco.Systems, Inc. Posted Jun. 27, 2001. Retrieved on Jun. 29, 2001., pp. 1-16.
Datta, Anindya , et al., “Adaptive Broadcast Protocols to Support Power Conservant Retrieval by Mobile Users”, IEEE Explore, (Apr. 7, 1997), pp. 1-12.
European Broadcasting Union, “Digital Video Broadcasting(DVB); Specifications for Service Information (SI) in DDVB systems”, European Broadcasting Union ETSI EN 300 468 V1.4.1(Nov. 2000), France Copyright 2000., pp. 1-83.
Foremski, Tom , “New digital technology is putting more choice in the hands of traditional TV audiences whi will increasingly be able to decide their own programme schedules”, Financial Times, (Mar. 3, 1999), pp. 1-5.
Fry, Andy , “Channelling digital choice”, Marketing, London, (Sep. 24, 1998), pp. 1-5.
Gummalla, Ajay Chandra V., “An Access Protocol for a Wireless Home Network”, IEEE, Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, Sep. 21, 1999, 1392-1396.
Hartwig, Stephan , et al., “Broadcasting and Processing of Program Guides for Digital TV”, SMPTE Journal, SMPTE, Inc., vol. 106, No. 10, Scarsdale, NY, XP000668926, (Oct. 1997), 727-732.
Haskell, Barry G., et al., “Digital Video; An Introduction to MPEG-2”, Chapman and Hall, New York NY, (1997), pp. 280-283.
Haubner, Dr. P. , et al., “Netzdienste fur Multimediale Anwendungen CSCW—MBone”, Teleseminar: Multimedia Systeme—Technoloqie and Gestaltunq WS 95/96, XP002248684, (1996), 1-20.
Holfeder, Wieland , “Interactive Remote Recording and Playback of Multicast Videoconferences”, XP002088645, (Sep. 10, 1997), 450-463.
Holsendolph, Ernest , “The TV that works Like a Genie in a Box a Coputer called TIVO acts Like a Brainy VCR. Even Fetching programs that it thinks you might like to watch”, Cox News Service, Greensboro News Record, Greensboro, NC, (Sep. 3, 1999), pp. 1-4.
Hu, Qinglong , et al., “Power Conservative Multi-Attribute Queries on Data Broadcast”, IEEE, Data Engineering, 16th International Confererence, San Diego, Calif., (2000), 157-177.
Hwang, Ren-Hung , et al., “Scheduling Policies for an VOD System over CATV Networks”, IEEE, Department of Computer Science & Information Engineering, (1997), 438-442.
Int'L Org. For Standardization, “Information Technology—Generic Coding of Moving Pictures and Associated Audio: Systems, Recommendation H.222.0, ISO/IEC 13818-1”, Int'l Orq. for Standardization, Coding of Moving Pictures and Associated Audio, N0801, XP002033056, (Nov. 13, 1994), 161 pp.
Intel Corporation, “Client Infrastructure for Internet-Based Data Services for Digital Television; Enabling a New Class of DTV Services”, INTEL: Intel Architecture, (2000), pp. 1-10.
Intel Corporation, “Internet and Broadcast: The Key to Digital Convergence. Utilizing Digital Technology to Meet Audience Demand”, INTEL: Intel Architecture Labs, (2000), pp. 1-4.
INTEL.com, “Enhanced Digital Broadcast”, http://www.develooer.intel.com/ial/home/digentertain/edb.htm., Retrieved on the Internet on Aug. 21, 2001. IAL Digitial Entertainment, pp. 1-3.
Morgenstern, Steve , “Digital Etc. the end of TV as we know it”, Proquest, Rolling Stone. New York, Issue 818, (Aug. 5, 1999), pp. 1-2.
Replaytv.com, “Competitive Differences ReplayTV Rules Here's Why . . . ”, www.replaytv.com/overview/differences.htm, (Mar. 21, 2000), pp. 1-2.
Replaytv.com, “Features Your Time, Your Schedule”, www.replavtv.com.overview/features/htm., Retrieved on Mar. 21, 2000., pp. 1-2.
Replaytv.com, “Frequently Asked Questions. Will ReplayTV make me more popular? and other frequently asked questions.”, www.replaytv.com/overview/faqs.htm, retrieved on Mar. 21, 2001, pp. 1-4.
Replaytv.com, “ReplayTV: Features/Benefits”, www.replaytv.com/overview/details.htm, Retrieved on Mar. 21, 2000., pp. 1-3.
Replaytv.com, “Technical Specifications”, www.replaytv.com/overview/techspecs.htm., Retrieved on Mar. 21, 2000., p. 1.
Replaytv.com, “What is ReplayTV? Introducing the new ReplayTV 2020”, www.replaytv.com/overview/index.htm., Retrieved on Mar. 21, 2000., pp. 1.
Rosenberg, Jerry , “Dictionary of Computers, information processing & telecommunications”, 2nd edition, (1987), p. 65.
Smyth, B , et al., “A Personalized Television Listings Service”, Communications of the ACM, vol. 43, No. 8, (Aug. 2000), pp. 107-111.
Tivo.com, “Channel SURF in a whole new way”, http://www.tivo.com/what/intro4/html, [retrieved on Mar. 21, 2000], pp. 1.
Tivo.com, “Control Live TV”, http://www.tivo.com/what/intro2/html, [retrieved on Mar. 21, 2000], p. 1.
Tivo.com, “Digital Recordings without the Tape”, http://www.tivo.com/what/intro5/html, [retrieved on Mar. 21, 2000], p. 1.
Tivo.com, “Frequently Asked Questions”, http://www.tivo.com/what/faq—sub.html., Retrieved on Mar. 21, 2000., pp. 1-9.
Tivo.com, “Product Specifications”, http://www.tivo.com/what/how2html, [retrieved on Mar. 21, 2000], p. 1.
Tivo.com, “Something Good Is Always on”, http://www.tivo.com/what/intro3/html., Retrieved on Mar. 21, 2000., p. 1.
Tivo.com, “What is TiVo? Introduction to TiVo. Something Good is Always on”, http://www.tivo.com/what/intro3.html, (Mar. 21, 2000), 1.
Tivo.Com, “What is TiVo? Introduction to TiVo. A Better to Watch TV”, http://www.tivo.com/what/intro/html, Retrieved on Mar. 21, 2000., p. 1.
Tivo.Com, “What you want, When you want it”, http://www.tivo.com/what/how/html., Retrieved on Mar. 21, 2000., p. 1.
Wittig, Hartmut , et al., “Intelligent Media Agents in Interactive Television Systems”, IEEE, Proceedings of the Int'l Conf. on Multimedia Computing and Systems, Los Angeles, CA XP00603484, (May 15, 1995), 182-189.
Wolinsky, Howard , “Hard Drive toward personalized TV // New computer devices search logs, then record”, Proquest, Chicago Sun—Times, Chicago, Ill., (Jan. 19, 1999), pp. 1-3
Wong, Tina , “Multicast Push Service for Web Content”, CS294-6 Internet Service Project Report, (Aug. 26, 2004), pp. 1-4
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20090037958 A1 Feb 2009 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09966676 Sep 2001 US
Child 12175909 US