The present invention relates generally to broadcast systems and, more specifically, the present invention relates to providing a personalized channel.
Broadcast systems traditionally transmit data in one direction from a server system to a plurality of client systems. For example, television and movies today are delivered via network and content aggregators. Moreover, content is delivered in a manner that has the broadest appeal. As an illustration, many of today's television broadcasters rely upon Neilson ratings to determine broadcast programming and/or scheduling. Neilson ratings are generally based upon only a small sampling of a cross-section of the public. Consequently, most television viewers have relatively little or no impact on broadcast schedules and/or content. Users of client systems typically just consume the signals received from the server system as they are broadcast.
One paradigm in which users are provided with some input into the content delivered to them is “content on demand,” which involves server systems that broadcast the same data continuously and/or at staggered intervals. Thus, if a user desires to consume a particular data file on demand, the user “tunes in” to one of the repeated broadcasts of the data file. One example of this paradigm can be illustrated with present day “pay per view” movies that are available from cable or satellite television providers. For instance, cable television providers commonly broadcast the same movies repeatedly on multiple channels at staggered intervals. Users that wish to watch a particular movie “on demand” simply tune in to one of the channels on which the desired movie is broadcast at the beginning of one of the times that the movie is broadcast. The continuous and repeated broadcasts of the same data or programs results in a very inefficient use of broadcast bandwidth. Bandwidth used to broadcast the same data repeatedly on multiple channels could otherwise be used to broadcast different data.
Another paradigm for providing content on demand in a broadcast system involves a user recording a particular data file and later accessing the data file “on demand.” Continuing with the television broadcast illustration discussed above, an example of this paradigm is a user setting up his or her video cassette recorder (VCR) to record a desired television program. Later, when the user wishes to watch the television program “on demand,” the user simply plays the earlier recorded program from his or her VCR. Recently, more advanced digital video recorders have become available, which record the television broadcasts on internal hard drives instead of the video cassette tapes used by traditional VCRs. However, use of the digital video recorders is similar to traditional VCRs in that the users are required to explicitly set the criteria used (e.g. date, time) to determine which broadcasts are recorded on the internal hard drives.
Other paradigms have been established to deliver content targeted at specific interest groups such as core interest channels, e.g. the Cartoon Network, the Disney Network, the E! Entertainment Network, etc.
However, even with the use of these new paradigms to provide targeted content and content “on demand,” none of these paradigms take into account a user's past viewing history and automatically and specifically target content for a given user.
The present invention is illustrated by way of example and not limitation in the accompanying figures.
In one aspect of the present invention, signaling methods and apparatuses for providing content on demand in a broadcast system are disclosed. In another aspect of the present invention, methods and apparatuses are disclosed for rating content to be broadcast or to be broadcast potentially from a server are disclosed. In yet another aspect of the present invention, methods and apparatuses for dynamically determining the broadcast content and/or schedule of a server are disclosed.
In one particular embodiment of the present invention, a method, apparatus, and machine-readable medium for automatically delivering data files (e.g. television and movies) via a personalized channel to a user, that are based on the user's profile and viewing habits, are provided. The personalized channel is displayed on a display device to the user. This enables a passive viewing experience for the end-user. The user only needs to tune to his or her personalized channel (e.g. channel 99) to view personalized content synthesized from all of available content sources available to the user. As an illustration, the content can be reviewed from a multitude of sources such as cable, standard television (TV) signals (e.g. National Television Standards Committee NTSC), Advanced Television System Committee (ATSC) format, Digital Video Broadcast (DVB) format, over a computer network, etc.)
In the following description, the various embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail. However, such details are included to facilitate understanding of the invention and to describe exemplary embodiments for implementing the invention. Such details should not be used to limit the invention to the particular embodiments described because other variations and embodiments are possible while staying within the scope of the invention. Furthermore, although numerous details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that these specific details are not required in order to practice the present invention. In other instances details such as, well-known methods, types of data, protocols, procedures, components, networking equipment, electrical structures and circuits, are not described in detail, or are shown in block diagram form, in order not to obscure the present invention. Furthermore, aspects of the invention will be described in particular embodiments but may be implemented in hardware, software, firmware, middleware, or a combination thereof.
In one embodiment, server 103 is configured to broadcast a plurality of data files, which may be received by clients 105, 107 and 109. In one embodiment, the data files may be any combination of a number of different types of files including for example video, audio, graphics, text, multi-media or the like. For purposes of explanation, many of the examples provided in this disclosure to help describe the present invention assume that the data files to be broadcast by the server are audio/video files, such as for example movies with moving images and sound. However, it will be appreciated that the data files broadcast in accordance with the teachings of the present invention are not limited only to audio/video files.
As illustrated in the embodiment shown
In the embodiment illustrated in
In one embodiment, machine 201 interfaces to external systems through communications interface 213. Communications interface 213 may include a radio transceiver compatible with FM, TV, digital TV, DVB, wireless telephone signals or the like. Communications interface 213 may also include an analog modem, Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) modem, cable modem, Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) modem, a T-1 line interface, a T-3 line interface, an optical carrier interface (e.g. OC-3), token ring interface, satellite transmission interface, a wireless interface or other interfaces for coupling a device to other devices.
In one embodiment, a carrier wave signal 223 is received by communications interface 213 to communicate with antenna 111. In one embodiment, carrier wave signal 225 is received/transmitted between communications interface 213 and network 113. In one embodiment, a communications signal 225 may be used to interface machine 201 with another computer system, a network hub, router or the like. In one embodiment, carrier wave signals 223 and 225 are considered to be machine readable media, which may be transmitted through wires, cables, optical fibers or through the atmosphere, or the like.
In one embodiment, processor 203 may be a conventional microprocessor, such as for example but not limited to an Intel x86 or Pentium family microprocessor, a Motorola family microprocessor, or the like. Memory 205 may be a machine readable medium such as dynamic random access memory (DRAM) and may include static random access memory (SRAM). Display controller 209 controls in a conventional manner a display device 219, which in one embodiment may be a cathode ray tube (CRT), a liquid crystal display (LCD), an active matrix display, a television monitor or the like. The input/output device 217 coupled to input/output controller 215 may be a keyboard, disk drive, printer, scanner and other input and output devices, including a television remote, mouse, trackball, trackpad, joystick, or the like. In one embodiment, audio controller 227 controls in a conventional manner audio output 231, which may include for example audio speakers, headphones, an audio receiver, amplifier or the like. In one embodiment, controller also controls in a conventional manner audio input 229, which may include for example a microphone or input(s) from an audio or musical device, or the like.
Storage 211 in one embodiment may include machine readable media such as for example but not limited to a magnetic hard disk, a floppy disk, an optical disk, a smart card or another form of storage for data. In one embodiment, storage 211 may include removable media, read-only media, readable/writable media or the like. Some of the data may be written by a direct memory access process into memory 205 during execution of software in computer system 201. It is appreciated that software may reside in storage 211, memory 205 or may be transmitted or received via modem or communications interface 213. For the purposes of the specification, the term “machine readable medium” shall be taken to include any medium that is capable of storing data, information or encoding a sequence of instructions for execution by processor 203 to cause processor 203 to perform the methodologies of the present invention. The term “machine readable medium” shall be taken to include, but is not limited to solid-state memories, optical and magnetic disks, carrier wave signals, and the like.
In one embodiment, a broadcast system, such as for example one similar to any of those illustrated in
In one embodiment, each client 105, 107 and 109 contains a known scheduling service, which accepts requests to wake up, or be activated, at a specific time to receive the information broadcast by the server. This scheduling service enables the client to wake up at a specified time and select a specified service. For example, in one embodiment, this selection process can be accomplished by tuning to a specific frequency, such as for example in an Advanced Television Systems Committee (ATSC) or a DVB transponder or the like. In one embodiment, the selection process or can be based on a set of data, such as for example multi-cast Internet protocol (IP) addresses, which define a service.
In one embodiment, a client application registers with the client signaling system to receive signals from a specific content provider. The client signaling system maintains a table of applications associated with specific content providers. In one embodiment, information from the server is broadcast over known addresses such that each client can use the known address.
Process block 305 shows that the client receives the meta-data broadcast schedule from the server. In one embodiment, client systems 105, 107 and 109 capture and process this pre-broadcast information in order to determine when to wake-up and receive content, where to receive the content and which content to receive. In one embodiment, when the meta-data broadcast schedule is received by the client, the registered application in the client is notified to receive the meta-data broadcast schedule.
In one embodiment, the clients wake-up at the pre-specified time indicated in the meta-data broadcast schedule to receive the meta-data from the server. Process block 307 shows that the meta-data is then actually broadcast from the server to the clients at the time specified in the meta-data broadcast schedule. Process block 309 shows that the client receives the broadcast of meta-data from the server. As will be discussed, the meta-data includes descriptions of a plurality of data files that will be broadcast or potentially broadcast later by the server system.
Process block 311 shows that the client system then updates a meta-data table and a content rating table. In one embodiment, a meta-data table and a content rating table are updated and maintained internally or locally by each client system in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.
In one embodiment, a user of the client system may optionally classify any one or more of the plurality of data files that are described by the received meta-data. As will be discussed, the meta-data table and content rating table are updated by the client if there is a user classification. This is shown in
In one embodiment, the clients wake-up to receive a data file broadcast schedule from the server. In one embodiment, the data file broadcast schedule indicates a future time in which specific data files, which were described in the previously broadcast meta-data, will be broadcast by the server. Process block 315 shows that the data files are then actually broadcast from the server to the clients at the time specified in the data file broadcast schedule. Process block 317 shows that the client receives the broadcast of data file broadcast schedule from the server.
In one embodiment, the clients wake-up at the pre-specified time indicated in the data file broadcast schedule to receive the data files from the server. Process block 319 shows that the data files are then actually broadcast from the server to the clients at the time specified in the data file broadcast schedule.
In one embodiment, process block 321 shows that the client receives the broadcast of the data files from the server. In one embodiment, client-side filtering according to the present invention is provided the client selectively storing data files according to the content rating table. In another embodiment, client-side filtering is provided by the client selectively waking up to selectively receive data files broadcast from the server according to the content rating table. In this embodiment, the client then stores the data files that were selectively received by the client according to the content rating table.
In one embodiment, the client receives meta-data broadcasts from the server system that includes descriptions for a plurality of data files that are currently being broadcasted, as well. As an illustration, meta-data can be included as part of an Electronic Program Guide (EPG) or an Expended Program Information Signal (EPI).
In one embodiment, in response to a content rating table that is based on a user's profile and viewing habits, a data file is automatically selected for the user, when the user tunes to his or her personalized channel 214 (e.g. channel 99). The data file can be selected based upon the ratings and/or relevance of the data file in relation to the content rating table. The automatically selected data file can be, for example a currently broadcasting data file or a data file stored in a cache memory of the client 201. As previously discussed, data files can be stored in cache memory, based upon the content rating table, for later viewing by a user.
In one embodiment, process block 323 shows that the client 201 displays data files for channels selected by the user on the display device 219, and particularly, displays the automatically selected data file on the personalized channel 214 on the display device 219, when the personalized channel 214 is picked by user. Thus, the client 201 streams data files (e.g. television and movies) tailored to the individual's tastes from live and captured content on the personalized channel 214 to the display device 219, with no user interaction required, except to pick the personalized channel 214.
In one embodiment, process block 325 shows that the client then updates the meta-data table and content rating table if there are any user accesses of currently broadcasting data files or stored data files. For purposes of this disclosure, a user access may include a user interacting with, viewing, watching, listening to, reading, consuming, etc., a data file. For instance, one example of a user accessing a data file may be the user watching a particular movie or listening to a particular song provided by one of the stored data files in client. In one embodiment, a user access will result in the meta-data table and content rating table on the client being updated locally.
The meta-data table and content rating table create, what is often termed a user profile, which is based upon a user's past viewing history and preferences and is used to predict what sort of data files (e.g. televisions and movies) the user would likely want to watch. The meta-data table, content rating table, user profiles, etc. may be stored locally at the client 201 (e.g. in memory 205, storage 211, etc.) or elsewhere (e.g. as part of a LAN or WAN).
For example, the processor 203 of the client 201 may run instances of what is often termed a preference engine or relevance engine, to create and update the meta-data table and content rating table. However, this can also be done remotely such as, part of a LAN, WAN, etc. A preference or relevance engine can be used to track user selection of data files (i.e. the channels selected and the types of content of the data files) and to create the meta-data table and the content rating table, representing the user's viewing preferences. Thus, the client 201 has a “learning” capability for adjusting a user's viewing preferences. For example a user's viewing preferences may be categorized based on broadcast content and the associated programming attributes associated with a data file, such as the genre (e.g. action, sports, comedy, entertainment, drama, etc.) as well as, associated attributes assigned by the program guide such as titles of data files, actors, directors, writers, etc.
For example, the processor 203 can run instances of a preference or relevance engine to automatically select the data file for the user. For instance, in response to the meta-data table and the content rating table, the preference or relevance engine can rate or determine the relevance of data files and automatically select the highest rated or most relevant data file, which is then displayed on the personalized channel 214 on the display device 219 to the user, when the user picks the personalized channel. As previously discussed, the selected data file can be, for example, a currently broadcasting data file or a data file stored in a cache memory of the client. Thus, the client 201 can stream data files (e.g. television and movies) tailored to the individual's tastes from live and captured content on a personalized channel 214 to the display device 219, with no user interaction required, except to pick the personalized channel.
Although, some types of user profiles and preference engines are already known, the present invention provides, as will be discussed with reference to the following
Continuing with reference to
In one embodiment, it is assumed that a meta-data table, a content rating table and a plurality of data files already exist in the client system. In one embodiment, the meta-data table, content rating table and plurality of data files may be stored and maintained in the client system in memory 205, storage 211 or by accessing a local network or the like with machine 201, as illustrated in the embodiment shown in
To help illustrate the meta-data aspect of the present invention,
In the illustrated embodiment, meta-data 501 in
Moreover, meta-data broadcasts from the server system can include descriptions for a plurality of data files that are currently being broadcasted or to be potentially broadcasted in the future. As an illustration, meta-data can be included as part of an Electronic Program Guide (EPG) or an Expanded Program Information Signal (EPI). This meta-data associated with EPGs and EPIs typically includes the name of the program, dates and times, movie rating, actors, genre (e.g. sports, action, comedy, drama, entertainment, news, etc), directors, writers, etc. Furthermore, EPIs often include information related to commercials, the expected life of content, additional information (e.g. website links for advertisers), etc. It should be appreciated that EPGs and EPIs and the types of information they contain are known in the art.
Referring back to the particular example shown in
To help illustrate the meta-data table aspect of the present invention,
In one embodiment, the relevance values in meta-data table 601 are indicators as to how relevant the associated attribute and attribute values are for predicting a particular user's behavior. For instance, the relevance value indicates how likely it is for the user to watch a particular movie because of this particular attribute value. In one embodiment, relevance values in meta-data table 601 are within a range of values such as for example from −10 to 10. As will be discussed, the relevance value may be increased if for example the user watches a particular movie or at least expresses an interest in a particular movie having that particular attribute value. Conversely, the relevance value may be decreased if the user for example does not watch a particular movie or if the user explicitly indicates that he or she does not want to watch a particular movie having that particular attribute value.
In one embodiment, the believability factors in meta-data table 601 are weighting factors to be applied to specific attribute and attribute value pairs when rating or predicting whether a user will actually access a particular data file having that particular attribute value. In one embodiment, believability factors in meta-data table 601 are within a range of values such as for example from −10 to 10. In one embodiment, the believability factors may be increased for example when an attribute value accurately predicts a data file in which the user is interested. Conversely, the believability factors may be decreased when a user is interested in the data file, even though the particular attribute value indicates otherwise.
In one embodiment, meta-data table 601 entries are constructed from the aggregation of all meta-data 501 associated with potential content or data files to be broadcast from server 103. In one embodiment, entries in meta-data table 601 are updated based on explicit user requests. In addition, updates to meta-data table 601 may also be implicitly based on whether a user accesses specific data files having particular attribute values, independent of whether the user explicitly classifies a particular movie.
To help illustrate the content rating table aspect of the present invention,
In one embodiment, data files may be stored locally by the client in for example memory 205, storage 211 or in a locally accessible network by machine 201 of
Referring back to the continuing example of data files representing audio/video files, a movie is stored locally by the client. After a user watches the movie, the storage space occupied by the movie is generally considered to be available for storage of another movie to be broadcast sometime later. Thus, it is appreciated that the local cache of the client system is modeled as the single use system, e.g. fire and forget, in accordance with teachings of the present invention. In one embodiment, it is assumed that when a user accesses a data file, it is not likely that the user will want to access that same data file again. If a user has not watched a particular movie, the storage space occupied by that movie is generally considered not to be available for storage of another movie. However, if there is no additional storage space available and a higher rated movie is to be broadcast, the lower rated unwatched movie is replaced by the higher rated movie in accordance with the teachings of the present invention.
Referring back to the embodiment of content rating table 701 shown
In one embodiment, the rating type indicator indicates whether the rating value of this particular data file was a result of explicit input from the user or if the rating value was implicitly generated by the client system. Thus, in one embodiment, the rating type indicator of content rating table 701 may be explicit, implicit or N/A if the data file or movie has not yet been rated. In one embodiment, if a data file has been explicitly classified by a user, the rating values of attribute values of the data file are no longer updated implicitly by the client system. However, if a data file has not yet been classified or has only been implicitly rated by the client system, the rating of the attribute values of the data file may be further updated or adjusted by the client system.
In one embodiment, the in cache indicator indicates whether that particular data file is currently stored or cached locally by the client. In the embodiment illustrated in
In one embodiment, the next treatment indicator is used to track future actions to be taken for the particular data file. For example, if a movie has already been watched by the user, the next treatment indicator would indicate “replace” to indicate that the storage space occupied by that particular movie is available for storage of another movie. In one embodiment, if the movie has not yet been watched by the user, the next treatment indicator would indicate “keep.” In one embodiment, if the movie has not been stored locally by the client and if the rating value predicts that this particular movie may be of interest to the user, the next treatment indicator would indicate “capture.” In one of embodiment, if the movie has not yet been broadcast by the server and the rating predicts that this movie is unlikely to be of interest to the user, the next treatment indicator would indicate “ignore.”
As was discussed back to
Referring back to
To illustrate an example of when a user classifies data files,
Continuing with the example of
Continuing with the example of
As will be discussed, in one embodiment, updates to the ratings in content rating table 701, as described in process block 411, are related to the relevance values and believability factors of the attribute values listed in meta-data table 601. A detailed description of the processing that occurs in process block 411 will be discussed below with a discussion of process block 417.
Referring back to
To illustrate an example of a user accessing data files, assume that the user watches the movie “Action Dude.” Meta-data 501 in
In one embodiment, the relevance values associated with implicitly rated data files are also increased in meta-data table 601 in response to a user access. However, in the example shown in meta-data table 601 of
In one embodiment, the rating values in content rating table 701 are determined as follows. Meta-data 501 shows that “Action Dude” has the attribute values “Joe Smith” and “action.” Meta-data table 601 of
To illustrate, referring to “Action Dude” in content rating table 701 of
Similarly, with regard to “Blast 'Em” in content rating table 701, “Blast 'Em” has the attribute values “Jane Doe” and “action.” The relevance value and believability factors for “Jane Doe” in meta-data table 601 of
It is noted that since the user classified the movies “Action Dude” and “The Funny Show” above in
It is appreciated that the discussion above provides one example of how the rating values in content rating table 701 are determined in accordance with the teachings of the present invention. It is noted that ratings values may be determined in other ways in accordance with the teachings of the invention, which consider the relevance values and believability factors for each of the attribute values of a data file.
In one embodiment, the entry for next treatment in content rating table 701 is determined in part by the rating and in cache values for the particular data file. For example, assume in one embodiment that a rating of greater than zero indicates that the user is predicted to have at least some interest in that particular movie. Therefore, the movies “Blast 'Em” and “Hardy Har Har” may be of some interest to the user. Thus, the next treatment indicates that the movie “Blast 'Em” will be kept in storage and the movie “Hardy Har Har” will be captured when it is later broadcast by the server. As mentioned above, the movie “Action Dude” is marked for replacement in the next treatment field because it has already been watched by the user.
In one embodiment, future interactions by a user with the client system results in similar processing as described above. For instance, assume that the user now watches the movie “Blast 'Em.” In this particular example, the user did not classify the movie “Blast 'Em” before watching the movie. In one embodiment, both of the relevance values and believability factors are updated for the attribute values of unclassified data files that are accessed, as shown in meta-data table 601 of
In one embodiment, each time the user interacts with the client system, the meta-data table 601 and the content rating table 701 are updated. Updates to be meta-data table 601 and content rating table 71 are performed when the user accesses data files as well as when the user explicitly classifies data files. It is appreciated that the user is not required to classify data files explicitly in order for the meta-data table 601 and content rating table 701 to be updated in accordance with the teachings of the present invention. As a result, the content rating table over time will more accurately predict data files in which the user is interested.
In one embodiment, the data files in which the user is predicted implicitly to be most interested as well as the data files in which the user explicitly classified an interest will be the data files that are cache locally on the client system. In effect, the television programs and movies that the user is most likely to want to watch are automatically stored locally, and therefore available “on demand,” in accordance with teachings of the present invention without the user having to explicitly request these television programs and movies in advance or explicitly specify criteria used to identify the movies. Moreover, these data files can be automatically selected and displayed on the personalized channel 214 on the display device 219 to the user, as will be discussed.
As can be appreciated, by storing the data files locally on each client, broadcast bandwidth is utilized more efficiently in accordance with teachings of the present invention. Indeed, when a user watches a movie from the local storage of the client, no additional broadcast bandwidth is utilized. In addition, it is also appreciated that a substantial amount of the processing performed in a system according to the teachings of the present invention is performed on each of the client systems when updating their respective meta-data tables and content rating tables. This distributed processing of the present invention enables the presently disclosed broadcast system to scale across a very large number of users since the incremental cost to the server for each additional client is zero.
In another embodiment, ratings values such as for example those generated in the content rating tables maintained and updated by client systems of the present invention may be used to determine broadcast content and schedules of a server in accordance with teachings of the present invention. For instance, assume a broadcast system such as for example the one described above in
In one particular embodiment of the present invention, a method, apparatus, and machine-readable medium for automatically delivering data files (e.g. television and movies) via a personalized channel 214 to the user, that are based on a user's profile and viewing habits, are provided. The personalized channel 214 is displayed on a display device 219 to the user. This enables a passive viewing experience for the end-user. The user only needs to tune to his or her personalized channel (e.g. channel 99) to view personalized content synthesized from all of available content sources available to the user.
For example, in one embodiment, a client 201 (e.g. a set-top box, personal computer etc.) receives meta-data broadcasts from a server system that includes descriptions of a plurality of data files currently being broadcasted or to be broadcast by the server system. As an illustration, meta-data can be included as part of an Electronic Program Guide (EPG) or an Expended Program Information Signal (EPI). In response to a content rating table that is based on a user's profile and viewing habits, a data file is automatically selected for the user. As previously discussed, data files are rated in response to a content rating table and meta-data tables. The data file can be selected based upon the ratings and/or relevance of the data file in relation to the content rating table. Particularly, the data file with the highest rating is automatically selected. The automatically selected data file is displayed on the personalized channel 214 on a display device 219 to the user, when the user picks or tunes to the personalized channel (e.g. channel 99).
The selected data file can be, for example, a currently broadcasting data file or a data file stored in a cache memory (e.g. memory 205, storage 211, etc.) of the client 201. As previously discussed, data files can be stored in cache memory for the user. The stored data files are selected based upon their ratings and the data file is stored in a cache memory to thereby create a stored data file. In one embodiment, the client 201 compares the ratings of the currently broadcasting data files and the stored data files, and based upon the ratings, the highest rated currently broadcasting data file or stored data file is automatically selected for display on the personalized channel 214. Thus, the client 201 can stream data files (e.g. television and movies) tailored to the individual user's tastes from live and captured content on the personalized channel 214 to the display device 219 for viewing by the user, with no user interaction required, except to pick the personalized channel. Moreover, targeted advertisements based on user preferences can be shown on the personalized channel 214 to the user.
At block 1310, the client 201 receives meta-data for data files currently being broadcasted and to be broadcast from the server 103. Next, at block 1320, the client 201 (e.g. utilizing a processor 203) performs processing (e.g. including relevance or preference processing) to rate data files in response to a content rating table, as previously discussed. At block 1330, the ratings of the currently broadcasted data files and the stored data files are compared. The currently broadcasted data file or the stored data file with the highest rating is then automatically selected (block 1340). The selected data file is then displayed on a personalized channel 214 for display on a display device 219 to the user, when the user picks or tunes to the personalized channel (e.g. channel 99).
At block 1402, the client 201 (e.g. utilizing a processor 203) processes incoming non-real time data files and meta-data, at a time prior to the current broadcast time (e.g. including relevance or preference processing) to rate data files in response to a content rating table, as previously discussed. If the meta-data associated with a data file achieves a moderate threshold rating then the data file and the meta-data is automatically selected for potential viewing on the personalized channel 214 and is cached or stored in memory (e.g. memory 205 or storage 211) at process block 1406. At block 1407, the stored data file is processed as a best stored data file option and is forwarded to decision block 1420. Generally, the best stored data file option satisfies a moderate threshold, e.g. a user is likely to enjoy the content. If the meta-data associated with a data file does not achieve a moderate threshold rating then the data file and meta-data is automatically discarded at block 1408. Moreover, the process 1400 may delete cached data files based on size, relevance based on time, e.g. news vs. movies, etc.
At block 1410, the client 201 (e.g. utilizing a processor 203) processes incoming real time data files and meta-data (e.g. including relevance or preference processing) to rate data files in response to a content rating table, as previously discussed. If the meta-data associated with the data file achieves a sufficiently high threshold rating, the data file is designated as an immediate viewing data file and is automatically forwarded to decision block 1420. For example, immediate viewing data files have very high threshold ratings based on the content rating table, e.g. a user always watches Monday Night Football at 8:00 PM. Therefore, the personalized channel 214 will almost always display this data file at 8:00 pm on Monday nights. On the other hand, if the meta-data associated with the data file does not achieve a sufficiently high threshold rating, the data file is sent to decision block 1402 for caching consideration, as previously discussed.
At block 1415, the client 201 (e.g. utilizing a processor 203) processes incoming real time data files and meta-data (e.g. including relevance or preference processing) to determine a best current data file option. The best current data file option is forwarded to decision block 1420. The best current data file is the best guess of the process 1400 as to which data file the user would likely want to view notwithstanding any highly relevant immediate viewing data files or moderately relevant stored data files.
At decision block 1420, one of the immediate viewing data file, the stored data file, or the best current data file option is selected. In one embodiment, the immediate viewing data file is given priority over the stored data file and the stored data file is given priority over the best current data file option. Thus, if the immediate viewing data file is available, it is automatically selected for display on the personalized channel 214 on the display device 219 (block 1422). However, if the immediate viewing data file is not available, and a best stored data file option is available, then the best stored data file option is automatically selected for display on the personalized channel 214 on the display device 219 (block 1422). If neither an immediate viewing data file or a best stored data file option is available, then the best current data file option is automatically selected for display on the personalized channel 214 on the display device 219 (block 1422). Thus, the client 201 can stream data files (e.g. television and movies) tailored to the individual's tastes from live and captured content on the personalized channel 214 to the display device 219, with no user interaction required, except to tune to the personalized channel (e.g. channel 99).
The embodiments of the present invention and their various functional components can be implemented in hardware, software, firmware, middleware or a combination thereof and utilized in systems, subsystems, components, or sub-components thereof. When implemented in software, these embodiments are the instructions/code segments to perform the necessary tasks. The program or code segments can be stored in a machine readable medium, such as a processor readable medium or a computer program product, or transmitted by a computer data signal embodied in a carrier wave, or a signal modulated by a carrier, over a transmission medium or communication link. The machine-readable medium or processor-readable medium may include any medium that can store or transfer information in a form readable and executable by a machine (e.g. a client, a processor, a computer, etc.). Examples of the machine/processor-readable medium include an electronic circuit, a semiconductor memory device, a ROM, a flash memory, an erasable programmable ROM (EPROM), a floppy diskette, CD-ROM, an optical disk, a hard disk, a fiber optic medium, a radio frequency (RF) link, etc. The computer data signal may include any signal that can propagate over a transmission medium such as electronic network channels, optical fibers, air, electromagnetic, RF links, etc. The code segments may be downloaded via computer networks such as the Internet, Intranet, etc.
In the foregoing detailed description, the method and apparatus of the present invention have been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments thereof. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the present invention. The present specification and figures are accordingly to be regarded as illustrative rather than restrictive.
This application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 09/966,676 filed on Sep. 28, 2001 now abandoned.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4115855 | Chiba | Sep 1978 | A |
4546382 | McKenna et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4566030 | Nickerson et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4602279 | Freeman | Jul 1986 | A |
4624578 | Green | Nov 1986 | A |
4646145 | Percy et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4695879 | Weinblatt | Sep 1987 | A |
5075771 | Hashimoto | Dec 1991 | A |
5155591 | Wachob | Oct 1992 | A |
5175836 | Morgan | Dec 1992 | A |
5227874 | Von Kohorn | Jul 1993 | A |
5303234 | Kou | Apr 1994 | A |
5357276 | Banker et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5388211 | Hornbuckle | Feb 1995 | A |
5392223 | Caci | Feb 1995 | A |
5408465 | Gusella et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5410272 | Haberland et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5410344 | Graves et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5426513 | Scorse et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5444499 | Saitoh | Aug 1995 | A |
5446919 | Wilkins | Aug 1995 | A |
5457808 | Osawa et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5483278 | Strubbe et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5483529 | Baggen et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5517254 | Monta et al. | May 1996 | A |
5530082 | Friebe et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5530965 | Kawasaki | Jun 1996 | A |
5534911 | Levitan | Jul 1996 | A |
5541638 | Story | Jul 1996 | A |
5544161 | Bigham et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550928 | Lu et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5559549 | Hendricks et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5563895 | Malkamaki et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5564088 | Saitoh | Oct 1996 | A |
5566174 | Sato et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568181 | Greenwood et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5574509 | Citta et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5583561 | Baker et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5583576 | Perlman et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5585838 | Lawler et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5594490 | Dawson et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5600364 | Hendricks et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5600573 | Hendricks et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5600606 | Rao | Feb 1997 | A |
5619247 | Russo | Apr 1997 | A |
5619249 | Billock et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5648824 | Dunn et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5652870 | Yamasaki et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5654747 | Ottesen et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5664091 | Keen | Sep 1997 | A |
5666293 | Metz et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5680322 | Shinoda | Oct 1997 | A |
5686954 | Yoshinobu et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5689439 | Weerackody et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5701599 | Aihara | Dec 1997 | A |
5717814 | Abecassis | Feb 1998 | A |
5717923 | Dedrick | Feb 1998 | A |
5724345 | Guarneri et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5724543 | Ozden et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5727002 | Miller et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5732282 | Provino et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5734890 | Case et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5740549 | Reilly et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5751282 | Girard et al. | May 1998 | A |
5752160 | Dunn | May 1998 | A |
5754938 | Herz et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758257 | Herz et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758259 | Lawler | May 1998 | A |
5768681 | Dan et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778182 | Cathey et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5790170 | Suzuki | Aug 1998 | A |
5790935 | Payton | Aug 1998 | A |
5801747 | Bedard | Sep 1998 | A |
5801753 | Eyer et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815662 | Ong | Sep 1998 | A |
5838668 | Okada et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838678 | Davis et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842199 | Miller et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5845090 | Collins et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5848396 | Gerace | Dec 1998 | A |
5867226 | Wehmeyer et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5867799 | Lang et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5872588 | Aras et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5897608 | Yokoyama et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5903314 | Niijima et al. | May 1999 | A |
5905713 | Anderson et al. | May 1999 | A |
5918002 | Klemets et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5918022 | Batz et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920642 | Merjanian | Jul 1999 | A |
5920700 | Gordon et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5926230 | Niijima et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5928330 | Goetz et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5930493 | Ottesen et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5937411 | Becker | Aug 1999 | A |
5940073 | Klosterman et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940738 | Rao | Aug 1999 | A |
5945988 | Williams et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5963551 | Minko | Oct 1999 | A |
5973683 | Cragun et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974398 | Hanson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5977964 | Williams et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5978381 | Perlman et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5983214 | Lang et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991735 | Gerace | Nov 1999 | A |
5991841 | Gafken et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999526 | Garland et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
5999908 | Abelow | Dec 1999 | A |
6002393 | Hite et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6002852 | Birdwell et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005597 | Barrett et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006247 | Browning et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6012051 | Sammon, Jr. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018359 | Kermode et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018768 | Ullman et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6020883 | Herz et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6021433 | Payne et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6025868 | Russo | Feb 2000 | A |
6028685 | Caridi et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029045 | Picco et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029176 | Cannon | Feb 2000 | A |
6055560 | Mills et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6057872 | Candelore | May 2000 | A |
6067564 | Urakoshi et al. | May 2000 | A |
6075971 | Williams et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6085252 | Zhu et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6085253 | Blackwell et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6088722 | Herz et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6108645 | Eichstaedt et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6114376 | Prichard et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6118492 | Milnes | Sep 2000 | A |
6119189 | Gafken et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125259 | Perlman | Sep 2000 | A |
6131127 | Gafken et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141785 | Hur et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144376 | Connelly | Nov 2000 | A |
6148005 | Paul et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6160989 | Hendricks et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6163316 | Killian | Dec 2000 | A |
6169570 | Suzuki | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177931 | Alexander et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6184918 | Goldschmidt Iki et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6185360 | Inoue et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6215776 | Chao | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226618 | Downs | May 2001 | B1 |
6233283 | Chiu et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6236395 | Sezan et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240553 | Son et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6271893 | Kawaguchi et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6279040 | Ma et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289012 | Harrington et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289510 | Nakajima | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298482 | Seidman et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6304578 | Fluss | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6317881 | Shah-Nazaroff et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6320850 | Perahia et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324182 | Burns et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6324338 | Wood et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6349321 | Katayama | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6357028 | Zhu | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6357042 | Srinivasan et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6359557 | Bilder | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6359571 | Endo et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6374405 | Willard | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6378036 | Lerman et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6389593 | Yamagishi | May 2002 | B1 |
6397387 | Rosin et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6424625 | Larsson et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430608 | Shaio | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434747 | Khoo et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438579 | Hosken | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438585 | Mousseau et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6445398 | Gerba et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6449632 | David et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6449654 | Blackwell et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6457010 | Eldering et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459427 | Mao et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6460036 | Herz et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463585 | Hendricks et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6467089 | Aust et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477704 | Cremia | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6480783 | Myr | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6481011 | Lemmons | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490722 | Barton et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6513014 | Walker et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6513069 | Abato et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6515964 | Cheung et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6516192 | Spaur et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6519571 | Guheen et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6526455 | Kamimura | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6526575 | McCoy et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6529526 | Schneidewend | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6530082 | Del Sesto | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6557042 | He et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6563515 | Reynolds et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6564381 | Hodge et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6570843 | Wolfgang | May 2003 | B1 |
6571389 | Spyker et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6574518 | Lounsberry et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6577599 | Gupta et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6578199 | Tsou et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6580452 | Gangitano | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6587985 | Fukushima et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6594682 | Peterson et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6594699 | Sahai et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601103 | Goldschmidt Iki et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601234 | Bowman-Amuah | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6601237 | Ten Kate et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6611842 | Brown | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6614987 | Ismail et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6617980 | Endo et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6625716 | Fackenthal | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6637029 | Maissel et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6642862 | Boudry | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6642939 | Vallone et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6643322 | Varma et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6647411 | Towell et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6662330 | Hershey | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6665655 | Warner et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6668246 | Yeung et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6668377 | Dunn | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671323 | Tahara | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6678890 | Cai | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6681393 | Bauminger | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6700893 | Radha et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6701528 | Arsenault et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6704929 | Ozer et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6715004 | Grimsrud et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6718551 | Swix et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6718552 | Goode | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6721713 | Guheen et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6721954 | Nickum | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728966 | Arsenault et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6751401 | Arai et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6763523 | Sacilotto, Jr. et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6772209 | Chernock et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6782370 | Stack | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6782476 | Ishibashi | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6792412 | Sullivan et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6792470 | Hakenberg et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6801936 | Diwan | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6842461 | Harris | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6850559 | Driessen et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6865746 | Herrington et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6868551 | Lawler et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6883176 | Grooters | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6898762 | Ellis et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6898800 | Son et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6922844 | Arsenault et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
6923911 | Beier et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6928655 | Omoigui | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6931657 | Marsh | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6934964 | Schaffer et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6947935 | Horvitz et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6950604 | Kato et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6973662 | Sie et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6990635 | Kurapati et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6990676 | Proehl et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7007294 | Kurapati | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7013478 | Hendricks et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7017189 | DeMello et al. | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7020189 | Sweitzer et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7024679 | Sie et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7024681 | Fransman et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7028071 | Slik | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7028220 | Park | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7035871 | Hunt et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7036137 | Arsenault et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7047456 | Jutzi | May 2006 | B2 |
7051352 | Schaffer | May 2006 | B1 |
7055165 | Connelly | May 2006 | B2 |
7055168 | Errico et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7058027 | Alessi et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7065709 | Ellis et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7072932 | Stahl | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7093295 | Saito | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7096486 | Ukai et al. | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7107271 | Aoki et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7114170 | Harris et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7117518 | Takahashi et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7167895 | Connelly | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7185355 | Ellis et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7231652 | Gutta et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7380262 | Wang et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
20010003828 | Peterson et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010012299 | Dahlen | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010013127 | Tomita et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010024239 | Feder | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010037507 | Mori | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047516 | Swain et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020011988 | Sai et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020026496 | Boyer et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020042923 | Asmussen et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020047902 | Thomas et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020056118 | Hunter et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020059394 | Sanders | May 2002 | A1 |
20020073245 | Hallford | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087969 | Brunheroto et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020100046 | Dudkiewicz | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020104087 | Schaffer et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020104095 | Nguyen et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020112235 | Ballou et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020124252 | Schaefer et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020129375 | Kim et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138733 | Ishibashi et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143591 | Connelly | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020143607 | Connelly | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020144265 | Connelly | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020144269 | Connelly | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020145052 | Cessac | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152463 | Dudkiewicz | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020152474 | Dudkiewicz | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156783 | Schwartz et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156912 | Hurst et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020157103 | Song et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020162120 | Mitchell | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020162121 | Mitchell | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020166269 | Merkli | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020167947 | Hallford et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020174430 | Ellis et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020188944 | Noble | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020193066 | Connelly | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194585 | Connelly | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194603 | Connelly | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020199186 | Ali et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020199194 | Ali | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004955 | Cedola et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030005311 | Kajimura et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030005438 | Crinon et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030005441 | Inoue | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030005451 | Connelly | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030005465 | Connelly | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030016673 | Pendakur et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030046633 | Jutzi | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030046683 | Jutzi | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030050929 | Bookman et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030051240 | Schaffer et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030056216 | Wugofski et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030058933 | Jutzi | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061206 | Qian | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030061611 | Pendakur | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065520 | Jutzi | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030066090 | Traw et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074664 | Kwoh | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030083951 | Connelly | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093792 | Labeeb et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097657 | Zhou et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030103532 | Bertram et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110499 | Knudson et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030135553 | Pendakur | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135857 | Pendakur et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149988 | Ellis et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040002896 | Alanen et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040003403 | Marsh | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040117831 | Ellis et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040123323 | Russo | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040163014 | Correa | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040194146 | Bates et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040221307 | Arai et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040226042 | Ellis | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050027382 | Kirmse et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050028208 | Ellis et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050149964 | Thomas et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050155063 | Bayrakeri et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050193414 | Horvitz et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050204387 | Knudson et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050204388 | Knudson et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050262542 | DeWeese et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050273832 | Zigmond et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283800 | Ellis et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060031882 | Swix et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060190966 | McKissick et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20080046930 | Smith et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20100017824 | Malik | Jan 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0064168 | Nov 1982 | EP |
0902569 | Mar 1999 | EP |
0905631 | Mar 1999 | EP |
1028511 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1043892 | Oct 2000 | EP |
1089201 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1089571 | Apr 2001 | EP |
1089572 | Apr 2001 | EP |
2001101190 | Apr 2001 | JP |
20011011190 | Apr 2001 | JP |
2001290727 | Oct 2001 | JP |
2003032710 | Jan 2003 | JP |
WO9102311 | Feb 1991 | WO |
WO9102311 | Feb 1991 | WO |
WO9726729 | Jul 1997 | WO |
WO9944159 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO9965237 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO0001149 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO0027124 | May 2000 | WO |
WO0040028 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO0059204 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO0064165 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO0064168 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO0105449 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO0115451 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO0117195 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO0137123 | May 2001 | WO |
WO172042 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO0193524 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO0248863 | Jun 2002 | WO |
WO02103940 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO02103941 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO02104030 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO02104031 | Dec 2002 | WO |
WO03028381 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO03030540 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO03061245 | Jul 2003 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/966,676 mailed Aug. 23, 2006, 11 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/966,676 mailed Mar. 2, 2007, 13 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/532,034, Connelly, Jay H. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/533,034, Connelly, Jay H. |
U.S. Appl. No. 09/717,579, Jutzi, Curtis E. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/823,566”, U.S. Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 09/823,566, (Oct. 23, 2006), 1-8. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 09/895,433”, U.S. Office Action, (Jun. 1, 2007), 8 pages. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/044,544”, U.S. Office action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/044,544, (Oct. 18, 2006), 27 pp. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 10/044,546”, U.S. Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/044,546, (Nov. 15, 2006), 1-23. |
“Internet and Broadcast; the Key to Digital Convergence”, Intel DeveloperUPDATEMagazine, (May 2000), pp. 1-3. |
“Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/882,091, mailed Nov. 26, 2007 (34 pp)”. |
“Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/882,205, mailed Aug. 29, 2007 (21 pp)”. |
“Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/882,205, mailed Dec. 13, 2007 (18 pp)”. |
“Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/966,676, mailed Feb. 21, 2008 (17 pp)”. |
“Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 09/966,676, mailed Sep. 10, 2007 (34 pp)”. |
“Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/043,918, mailed Oct. 2, 2007 (23 pp)”. |
“PCT International Search Report”, PCT/US01/43862 (Dec. 4, 2003), 1-4. |
“PCT International Search Report”, PCT/US02/17270, (Jun. 3, 2003), 1-4. |
“PCT International Search Report”, PCT/US02/17381 (Oct. 20, 2003), 1-6. |
“PCT International Search Report”, PCT/US02/17316 (Nov. 6, 2002), 1-8. |
“PCT International Search Report”, PCT/US02/29091, (Apr. 3, 2003), 1-5. |
“PCT International Search Report”, PCT/US02/29099 (Mar. 28, 2003), 1-4. |
“PCT International Search Report”, PCT/US03/001694 (Jun. 2, 2003), 1-4. |
Advanced Television Systems Comm, “Program and System Information Protocol for Terrestrial Broadcast and Cable (Revision A) and Amendment No. 1”, Advanced Television Systems Committee Doc. A/65A, Dec. 23, 1997, Rev. A pp. a-e and pp. 1-135, (May 31, 2000), pp. a-e & 1-135. |
Anonymous, “Set-top box offer new possibilities for broadcaster”, Proquest, Broadcast Engineering, Overland Park. vol. 41, Issue 7., (Jun. 1999), pp. 1-2. |
Blundon, William , “When Push comes to Shove”, Blundons Corner, (Apr. 1997), pp. 1-4. |
Business Wire, “MessageMedia Launches Support View”, (Nov. 18, 1999), 1-2. |
Cisco.Com, “Internet Protocol (IP) Mutlicast Technology Overview”, http://.www.cisco.com/warp/—public/cc/pd/iosw/tech/ipmu—ov/htm, Whitepaper Cisco.Systems, Inc. Posted Jun. 27, 2001. Retrieved on Jun. 29, 2001., pp. 1-16. |
Datta, Anindya , et al., “Adaptive Broadcast Protocols to Support Power Conservant Retrieval by Mobile Users”, IEEE Explore, (Apr. 7, 1997), pp. 1-12. |
European Broadcasting Union, “Digital Video Broadcasting(DVB); Specifications for Service Information (SI) in DDVB systems”, European Broadcasting Union ETSI EN 300 468 V1.4.1(Nov. 2000), France Copyright 2000., pp. 1-83. |
Foremski, Tom , “New digital technology is putting more choice in the hands of traditional TV audiences whi will increasingly be able to decide their own programme schedules”, Financial Times, (Mar. 3, 1999), pp. 1-5. |
Fry, Andy , “Channelling digital choice”, Marketing, London, (Sep. 24, 1998), pp. 1-5. |
Gummalla, Ajay Chandra V., “An Access Protocol for a Wireless Home Network”, IEEE, Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, Sep. 21, 1999, 1392-1396. |
Hartwig, Stephan , et al., “Broadcasting and Processing of Program Guides for Digital TV”, SMPTE Journal, SMPTE, Inc., vol. 106, No. 10, Scarsdale, NY, XP000668926, (Oct. 1997), 727-732. |
Haskell, Barry G., et al., “Digital Video; An Introduction to MPEG-2”, Chapman and Hall, New York NY, (1997), pp. 280-283. |
Haubner, Dr. P. , et al., “Netzdienste fur Multimediale Anwendungen CSCW—MBone”, Teleseminar: Multimedia Systeme—Technoloqie and Gestaltunq WS 95/96, XP002248684, (1996), 1-20. |
Holfeder, Wieland , “Interactive Remote Recording and Playback of Multicast Videoconferences”, XP002088645, (Sep. 10, 1997), 450-463. |
Holsendolph, Ernest , “The TV that works Like a Genie in a Box a Coputer called TIVO acts Like a Brainy VCR. Even Fetching programs that it thinks you might like to watch”, Cox News Service, Greensboro News Record, Greensboro, NC, (Sep. 3, 1999), pp. 1-4. |
Hu, Qinglong , et al., “Power Conservative Multi-Attribute Queries on Data Broadcast”, IEEE, Data Engineering, 16th International Confererence, San Diego, Calif., (2000), 157-177. |
Hwang, Ren-Hung , et al., “Scheduling Policies for an VOD System over CATV Networks”, IEEE, Department of Computer Science & Information Engineering, (1997), 438-442. |
Int'L Org. For Standardization, “Information Technology—Generic Coding of Moving Pictures and Associated Audio: Systems, Recommendation H.222.0, ISO/IEC 13818-1”, Int'l Orq. for Standardization, Coding of Moving Pictures and Associated Audio, N0801, XP002033056, (Nov. 13, 1994), 161 pp. |
Intel Corporation, “Client Infrastructure for Internet-Based Data Services for Digital Television; Enabling a New Class of DTV Services”, INTEL: Intel Architecture, (2000), pp. 1-10. |
Intel Corporation, “Internet and Broadcast: The Key to Digital Convergence. Utilizing Digital Technology to Meet Audience Demand”, INTEL: Intel Architecture Labs, (2000), pp. 1-4. |
INTEL.com, “Enhanced Digital Broadcast”, http://www.develooer.intel.com/ial/home/digentertain/edb.htm., Retrieved on the Internet on Aug. 21, 2001. IAL Digitial Entertainment, pp. 1-3. |
Morgenstern, Steve , “Digital Etc. the end of TV as we know it”, Proquest, Rolling Stone. New York, Issue 818, (Aug. 5, 1999), pp. 1-2. |
Replaytv.com, “Competitive Differences ReplayTV Rules Here's Why . . . ”, www.replaytv.com/overview/differences.htm, (Mar. 21, 2000), pp. 1-2. |
Replaytv.com, “Features Your Time, Your Schedule”, www.replavtv.com.overview/features/htm., Retrieved on Mar. 21, 2000., pp. 1-2. |
Replaytv.com, “Frequently Asked Questions. Will ReplayTV make me more popular? and other frequently asked questions.”, www.replaytv.com/overview/faqs.htm, retrieved on Mar. 21, 2001, pp. 1-4. |
Replaytv.com, “ReplayTV: Features/Benefits”, www.replaytv.com/overview/details.htm, Retrieved on Mar. 21, 2000., pp. 1-3. |
Replaytv.com, “Technical Specifications”, www.replaytv.com/overview/techspecs.htm., Retrieved on Mar. 21, 2000., p. 1. |
Replaytv.com, “What is ReplayTV? Introducing the new ReplayTV 2020”, www.replaytv.com/overview/index.htm., Retrieved on Mar. 21, 2000., pp. 1. |
Rosenberg, Jerry , “Dictionary of Computers, information processing & telecommunications”, 2nd edition, (1987), p. 65. |
Smyth, B , et al., “A Personalized Television Listings Service”, Communications of the ACM, vol. 43, No. 8, (Aug. 2000), pp. 107-111. |
Tivo.com, “Channel SURF in a whole new way”, http://www.tivo.com/what/intro4/html, [retrieved on Mar. 21, 2000], pp. 1. |
Tivo.com, “Control Live TV”, http://www.tivo.com/what/intro2/html, [retrieved on Mar. 21, 2000], p. 1. |
Tivo.com, “Digital Recordings without the Tape”, http://www.tivo.com/what/intro5/html, [retrieved on Mar. 21, 2000], p. 1. |
Tivo.com, “Frequently Asked Questions”, http://www.tivo.com/what/faq—sub.html., Retrieved on Mar. 21, 2000., pp. 1-9. |
Tivo.com, “Product Specifications”, http://www.tivo.com/what/how2html, [retrieved on Mar. 21, 2000], p. 1. |
Tivo.com, “Something Good Is Always on”, http://www.tivo.com/what/intro3/html., Retrieved on Mar. 21, 2000., p. 1. |
Tivo.com, “What is TiVo? Introduction to TiVo. Something Good is Always on”, http://www.tivo.com/what/intro3.html, (Mar. 21, 2000), 1. |
Tivo.Com, “What is TiVo? Introduction to TiVo. A Better to Watch TV”, http://www.tivo.com/what/intro/html, Retrieved on Mar. 21, 2000., p. 1. |
Tivo.Com, “What you want, When you want it”, http://www.tivo.com/what/how/html., Retrieved on Mar. 21, 2000., p. 1. |
Wittig, Hartmut , et al., “Intelligent Media Agents in Interactive Television Systems”, IEEE, Proceedings of the Int'l Conf. on Multimedia Computing and Systems, Los Angeles, CA XP00603484, (May 15, 1995), 182-189. |
Wolinsky, Howard , “Hard Drive toward personalized TV // New computer devices search logs, then record”, Proquest, Chicago Sun—Times, Chicago, Ill., (Jan. 19, 1999), pp. 1-3 |
Wong, Tina , “Multicast Push Service for Web Content”, CS294-6 Internet Service Project Report, (Aug. 26, 2004), pp. 1-4 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090037958 A1 | Feb 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09966676 | Sep 2001 | US |
Child | 12175909 | US |