The present invention relates to the field of low Radar Cross Section (RCS) antennas for objects or vehicles such as fighter aircrafts or missiles. The antennas are of the type Active Electrically Scanned Antenna (AESA).
There is a need today for creating a low radar signature for different objects such as e.g. aircrafts, i.e. to design aircrafts having a low radar visibility. Significant progress has been achieved in a number of problem areas as e.g.:
but there is often a problem with reducing the passive signature of the aircraft sensors such as antennas.
A number of solutions have been proposed to achieve antennas with a low Radar Cross Section, RCS. The RCS value for an object depends on its size, shape, reflectivity and direction of the signal reflected from the object.
It is now familiar to most that a flat-plate antenna on a mechanical turntable is a major contributor to the RCS value of any fourth-generation fighter. A flat plate antenna is a passive, slotted waveguide antenna with a thin RF distribution network. Another way to put it is that there is limited reason to embark on a costly RCS reduction programme of a 4G aircraft as long as the flat-plate remains in place. It is also well-known that an Active Electrically Scanned Antenna (AESA) offers a lower RCS value than the flat-plate antenna.
However, it is not widely known that the RCS of an ordinary AESA is too high for any aircraft with substantial, low-RCS enabled abilities. This means that the tactics, number of aircraft, and other resources needed for an AESA-equipped 4G aircraft are comparable to what is required for a flat-plate 4G aircraft—mission for mission.
A stealth AESA, on the other hand, has an RCS so low that it enables an aircraft—provided the aircraft itself has a low RCS—to perform missions previously regarded out of reach for a 4G aircraft.
Most of the problems with existing stealth AESA solutions have been given unique solutions leading to high complexity, and consequently, a high cost. In some cases the performance is also limited. Some main problems are:
There is thus a need to achieve a low RSC AESA for objects or vehicles such as fighters and missiles while at the same time offering improved handling and mechanical stability.
The object of the invention is to remove at least some of the above mentioned deficiencies with prior art solutions and to provide:
to solve the problem of providing an AESA with improved handling and mechanical stability while at the same time achieving a low RCS.
This object is achieved by providing an antenna structure for an Active
Electrically Scanned Antenna, AESA, with a low Radar Cross Section (RCS), comprising an AESA enclosure and at least two antenna elements. Said antenna elements being arranged to be mounted on a front surface of the AESA enclosure and embedded in a lightweight structure. The front surface and side surfaces of the AESA enclosure and the antenna elements are arranged to be covered with the lightweight structure wherein a thin laminate is arranged to cover an outer top surface and an outer side surface of the lightweight structure. Parts of the lightweight structure is further arranged to be doped with a lossy material having dielectric, magnetic and/or resistive losses, thus making these parts of the lightweight structure absorbing for electromagnetic radiation.
This object is further achieved by providing a method for arranging an antenna structure for an Active Electrically Scanned Antenna, AESA, with a low Radar Cross Section (RCS), comprising an AESA enclosure and at least two antenna elements. Said antenna elements are mounted on a front surface of the AESA enclosure and embedded in a lightweight structure. The front surface and side surfaces of the AESA enclosure and the antenna elements are covered with the lightweight structure wherein a thin laminate covers an outer top surface and an outer side surface of the lightweight structure. Parts of the lightweight structure are doped with a lossy material having dielectric, magnetic and/or resistive losses, thus making these parts of the lightweight structure absorbing for electromagnetic radiation.
Further advantages are achieved by implementing one or several of the features of the dependent claims which will be explained below.
a schematically shows a cross section of the Active Electrically Scanned Antenna (AESA).
b schematically shows a front view of a flared notch antenna element.
c schematically shows a top view of an antenna aperture.
The invention will now be described in detail with reference to the drawings.
The stealth AESA is not a very wide-spread concept. There are several design principles such as:
Most of these design principles have been given individual solutions leading to a high degree of complexity, and consequently, a high cost. The invention however provides an overall solution to achieve a low-RCS AESA or a stealth AESA.
The invention consists of a light but rigid lightweight structure, placed on the AESA. The lightweight material is preferably an electrically isotropic lightweight material, but also other materials, such as honeycomb can be used. Structural strength is increased by covering at least part of the lightweight structure with a very thin but strong laminate. RCS is reduced by letting part of the lightweight structure be doped with a lossy material, i.e. a material having dielectric, magnetic and/or resistive losses. This means that the lossy material can have dielectric, magnetic or resistive losses or any combination of these types of losses.
The laminate should be so thin, a few tens of a millimeter, that an incident wave passes without noticeable losses or reflection. In addition, the relative electrical permittivity E should be low, typically less than 4, and the resistivity σ should be negligible. All these required parameter values can be achieved simultaneously using standard laminates. The key advantage is that the laminate can be made much thinner than a conventional cover laminate without supportive lightweight material. A thinner laminate over a supportive lightweight material according to the invention means less reflections of incident waves from the laminate. As a further consequence and advantage of the invention, the ability to scan over the required bandwidth, i.e. the ability to receive and transmit over the required bandwidth in different directions, can be maintained with no increase of losses.
b shows a front view of one flat antenna element 112 with its base 119 and notch 118, the notch being the radiating part of the antenna element. The example of
c is a schematic top view of an antenna aperture 130 showing the antenna elements 112 being arranged on the antenna aperture 130 in M columns 120. The cross section of figure la shows the centre column 124 with 18 antenna elements. M is an integer value where M is greater than or equal to 2. The antenna aperture of
The thin laminate 114 may, as mentioned, be put entirely around the lightweight structure, as indicated in
Antenna elements made by metal may withstand the mechanical strains associated with flight. Moreover, they can be fabricated with narrow tolerances, a necessary (but not sufficient) prerequisite for low antenna RCS. However, they are expensive to manufacture, and separate feeding laminates must nevertheless be manufactured, increasing the cost even further.
Short antenna elements:
However, the height is not very critical, as:
Moreover, long antenna elements have the advantage that they can result in a lower antenna RCS since they can absorb incident radiation over a wide frequency band.
Long antenna elements including feeding lines, as e.g. flared notch elements, applied to PCB (Printed Circuit Board) substrates by etching, can be manufactured in a low-cost production method with narrow tolerances along the PCB-surface and are therefore ideal to use as antenna elements 112. This means that a separate feeding laminate is not required, which is an advantage compared to the situation when using a metal antenna as described above. However, the long PCB substrates bend easily, so they must be stabilized in directions normal to the PCB surface. Also other types of antenna elements can be applied to the PCB substrate by any suitable production method. A long antenna element has a length of at least a half wavelength, typically several wavelengths, of the upper operating frequency limit of the AESA.
An advantage of the present invention is its ability to keep long, low-cost and wide-band PCB-etched antenna elements located to positions within required tolerances. This is accomplished by the PCB substrates, comprising the antenna elements, being inserted into wedges or slots in the lightweight structure. When the PCB substrates are pressed into the wedges or slots in the lightweight structure the resulting pressure on the lightweight structure is transferred to the thin PCB substrate at the upper part of the PCB substrate and thus stabilizes the PCB substrates into the desired positions.
The lightweight structure is machined in at least two parts, preferably in one thick, lower lightweight structure 301 and one thinner, upper lightweight structure 302. The upper lightweight structure is thus thinner than the lower lightweight structure.
The ability to realize a tapering over the outer elements, useful for suppressing co-polarized incident waves, depends on having as small separation as possible between the lightweight material surfaces 307 of the slots and the adjacent PCB surfaces, i.e. the antenna elements have to be closely surrounded by the doped lightweight material in order to achieve a suitable attenuation. If it is considered too cumbersome e.g. from a manufacturing point of view to have a sufficiently small, said separation, a thin layer of lossy material can, as an alternative, be fastened onto the part of the PCB that comprises outer antenna elements, prior to mounting the lightweight structure. The tapering effect will be described in detail in association with
The narrow-tolerance requirement in the position transverse to the antenna elements need only be maintained during machining of the upper lightweight structure 302. This is facilitated by the fact that the upper lightweight structure is thin and by the fact that it is stabilized by the thin laminate 114 mentioned previously. Narrow tolerances are facilitated by choosing the material of the lightweight structure 301/302 to be foam, rather than honeycomb. The narrow tolerances in the position of the antenna elements avoids diffuse scattering from the antenna aperture of the antenna structure. Wide tolerances in the positions of the antenna elements cause a diffuse scattering that increases RCS near the main lobe and near the grating lobes.
Lightweight materials are sensitive to abrasion. Therefore, the side surfaces of the slots in the upper lightweight structure 302 can be treated with some friction lowering material and/or some surface sealing material such as paint. This is more feasible to do if the lightweight material is foam, rather than honeycomb.
The lightweight structure should be assembled using the antenna elements as an assembly rig. This means that when the upper lightweight structure 302 is applied to the lower lightweight structure 301, by using e.g. gluing, the antenna elements should be in place. The upper lightweight structure 302 need not be steered in lateral position except the steering obtained by the entire collection of antenna elements. This implies further that the top parts of the antenna elements will be positioned well relative to each other, but that the position of the lattice of antenna elements, may differ from a nominal position. This is acceptable since a deviation of the entire lattice will not add to the RCS, as RCS from a scattering object is independent of the position of the lattice.
As mentioned in association with
Following parts of the lightweight structure should preferably be absorbing:
The mid section 509 of the lightweight structure is lossless, i.e. it is not doped with any lossy material.
The lightweight structure 113 thus comprises of a lossless part 509 and following parts, preferably with absorbing lightweight material:
The tapering of the antenna elements means that the outer antenna elements are embedded in a lightweight material having the property of causing increasing losses, to incident or receiving waves and transmitted waves, the closer the lightweight material comes to the outer side surface 511 of the lightweight structure. The tapering causes the current distribution along the aperture 130 of the antenna structure to have a maximum in the centre and then a successively decreasing absolute current value towards the outer antenna elements of the antenna structure. This current distribution has the positive effect of reducing the RCS in certain directions.
The low Radar Cross Section (RCS) property of the invention is thus accomplished by:
The friction fastening of the lightweight structure to the AESA enclosure should be assisted by fastening means such as a few, say 6-12, small plastic screws 601 with plastic inserts 602 as illustrated in
Finally, the outer side surface 511 of the lightweight structure should preferably follow the shape of the radome to the AESA, the radome being shaped for an optimum blend of aerodynamic and RCS performance. This design will maximize the absorption of incident radiation entering the region between the side surfaces of the AESA and the radome. This could, for instance lead to an asymmetric shape of the lightweight structure according to
For clarity reasons
The proposed lightweight structure efficiently reduces all RCS contributions from the exterior of the AESA, including the scattering from the outer antenna elements. It offers stability at low-cost and low-RCS antenna elements and may improve on the hermeticity required by the antenna. A good hermeticity prevents dust, trash and humidity to get in contact with the antenna elements and thus affect the performance of the antenna. The hermetic enclosure of the antenna elements also protects the antenna elements from being touched which could alter the performance.
The antenna aperture can have a shape as shown in
The invention is not limited to the embodiments and examples above, but may vary freely within the scope of the appended claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE08/51294 | 11/12/2008 | WO | 00 | 8/9/2011 |