The present invention relates to a method and an arrangement for determining the state of charge of a battery, in particular the starting battery of a motor vehicle.
Several methods are known to determine the state of charge of starting batteries in motor vehicles. Exemplary methods should be noted, which determine the state of charge via the measurable charge-proportional off-load voltage of a battery which has been idle for a longer period of time, typically four to five hours, using current integration and re-calibration. A method of this type is described in German Patent No. 35 20 985. Furthermore, model-based methods should be noted, which make it possible to determine the off-load voltage and therefore also the state of charge derivable from this off-load voltage, for a battery under load via adaptation of a model to the actual battery using the aid of sensor variables, such as battery voltage, battery current, and/or battery temperature.
The above-mentioned methods are relatively simple to implement; however, they result in errors during long operating phases of the vehicles, having relatively short or only few rest periods (e.g. taxi operations), because the state of charge may only seldom be re-calibrated or corrected via a measurement of the off-load voltage.
Model-based methods, in contrast, do not rely on rest periods for re-calibration, and the implementation of such methods, depending on the complexity of the underlying battery model, is relatively complex.
The present invention intends to provide a simple and less complex battery charge detection system for starting batteries in motor vehicles, in particular batteries which are used in vehicle operations without rest periods, for example in taxi operations.
According to the present invention, a simple battery model is used for re-calibration of the current integration. Because of the simple model approach having few parameters, the utilized estimation procedure for the state of charge may also be used simultaneously for the estimation of unknown parameters without the need for a separate parameter estimator, as described in German Published Patent Application No. 199 50 919, for example.
In contrast to known model-based methods for determining the state of charge, which operate with complex battery models covering a wide dynamic range as well as a wide operating range with regard to temperature, current, and state of charge, according to the present invention a model is used which only takes into account time constants on the order of magnitude of minutes and hours. This makes it possible to keep the model simple, having only few parameters to be determined.
The described method is advantageously only activated in a valid operating range of the model.
The first operating range in which the method is implemented is expediently defined as one where a minimum battery current IBatt,min is exceeded. The limitation of the model, used according to the present invention, to this operating range, i.e., the discharge range of the battery is acceptable with regard to applications for monitoring a minimum state of charge and in practice produces satisfactory results.
Off-load voltage of the battery from which the battery condition is derivable is advantageously calculated on the basis of the model calculation. Such relationships between off-load and state of charge of the battery are known per se and do not require further explanation.
Battery condition soc is expediently determined according to a function of the following formula
soc=f(UR)=(UR−UR,min)/(UR,max−UR,min) (1)
Where UR,min and UR,max represent the minimum and maximum off-load voltages, respectively, according to the acid density values for a dead and a fully charged battery provided by the battery manufacturer.
According to a particularly advantageous embodiment of the present invention, the determination of the state of charge is carried out on the basis of a measurement of the battery current and a latest calculated or estimated off-load voltage URO if a second operating range of the battery is present. If the current integral is formed according to formula Q=−ƒIBattdt, it is possible to calculate in this way an instantaneous off-load voltage UR according to an equation of the formula UR=URO+Q/C. Here it is also possible to calculate the instantaneous state of charge on the basis of equation (1) mentioned above.
It is expediently assumed that a second operating range is present if the battery current is less than the minimum battery current lBatt,min.
Because of the distinction that is made between the two operating ranges mentioned, where IBatt>IBatt,min applies for the first range, and IBatt<=IBatt,min applies to the second range, an adequate assessment of the state of charge across the entire battery operating range is possible.
Additional advantages of the present invention arise from the following description of preferred embodiments.
An electrical equivalent circuit diagram of a battery with which the method according to the present invention is applicable is illustrated in FIG. 1. Here capacitor C describes the almost linear relationship between charge Q of the battery and off-load voltage UR of the battery. Via capacitor CK and resistor RK, concentration overvoltage UK emulates the dynamics of the acid density compensation between the plate pores and the free acid volume. Internal resistance Rj of the battery includes the ohmic resistances of electrodes and electrolyte as well as the transition resistance of the double layer between electrodes and electrolyte. Finally, IBatt indicates battery current or discharging current and UBatt indicates battery voltage.
The method according to the present invention is explained further with reference to
The state of charge of the battery is determined using off-load voltage value UR calculated in this manner, as further explained below.
First, it is assumed that battery current IBatt is greater than minimum battery current lBatt,min, i.e., the battery is in its discharging operating range. In this operating range, in order to estimate off-load voltage UR, concentration overvoltage UK as well as internal resistance Rj, a monitor is utilized, for example in the form of a Kalman filter 1 (dashed-line frame). For this purpose the utilized model is adjusted by feeding back the error UBatt−UBatt between the measured and calculated battery voltage. If, for example, parameters C, RK and CK are unknown they may also be included in the estimation after a battery replacement.
As mentioned before, model adjustment only takes place at the operating points relevant for model validity, i.e., for IBatt>IBatt,min (discharging current >0). In this case it means that a value k=k0=UBatt−UBatt is input into the model calculation.
In the other operating points for which IBatt≦IBatt,min applies, the feedback of the error into the model calculation is interrupted, i.e., k is set equal to 0. In this second operating range, off-load voltage UR is calculated using current integral Q=−ƒIBattdt and off-load voltage R0 is estimated last, in particular in the first operating range, according to the equation UR=URO+Q/C.
In both operating ranges, off-load voltage value UR resulting from the calculation is subjected to another mathematical operation, in order to obtain battery condition soc (State of Charge). The battery condition is expediently determined according to an equation of the formula
soc=f(UR)=(UR−UR,min)/(UR,max−UR,min).
As already mentioned, UR,min and UR,max indicate the minimum and maximum off-load voltages for the acid density values of a dead and a fully charged battery, according to the battery manufacturer.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
100 56 969 | Nov 2000 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/DE01/04197 | 11/8/2001 | WO | 00 | 10/8/2002 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO02/41014 | 5/23/2002 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4390841 | Martin et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
5349540 | Birkle et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5381096 | Hirzel | Jan 1995 | A |
5937622 | Carrier et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
35 20 985 | Dec 1986 | DE |
199 50 919 | May 2001 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030052690 A1 | Mar 2003 | US |