This application is a U.S. national stage application of international app. No. PCT/FI2004/000720, filed Nov. 26, 2004, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein, and claims priority on Finnish App. No. 20031735, Filed Nov. 27, 2003.
Not applicable.
The invention relates to a method for preventing vibrations in a multi-nip calender, and to an arrangement for preventing vibrations in a multi-nip calender.
The multi-nip calender examined in this invention comprises an upper roll and a lower roll, which are equipped with variable-crown means within the rolls. The upper and/or lower roll can be loaded by external hydraulic cylinders in a direction parallel to plane of the set of rolls, thus generating the desired overall nip pressure and nip pressure distribution in the roll nips of the set of rolls. Two or more intermediate rolls are disposed between the upper and lower roll, in alignment with these. Support arms are attached to bearing houses provided at the ends of the intermediate rolls, the intermediate rolls being articulated from the support arms to the calender frame. Load-relieving means, such as hydraulic cylinders, are connected to the support arms for relieving the weight of the intermediate rolls proper and that of associated auxiliary devices, such as doctor blades, steamer boxes and output rolls.
In a multi-nip calender, there are frequently generated vibrations impairing the calendering result, particularly in cases where the calendering conditions (including nip pressure, moisture of the fiber web, speed of the fiber web) have remained constant over a long period. DE patent specification 10036574 discloses a method for calendering a fiber web in a multi-nip calender with a view to preventing such vibrations generated in a multi-nip set of rolls. The method alters the nip load exerted on a multi-nip calender. Such altered nip load may prevent vibrations in a set of rolls, yet involving the problem of poorer printing characteristics of certain paper grades.
The purpose of the invention is to eliminate the problems occurring in prior art. Thus, the main objective of the invention is to prevent generation of vibration in a multi-nip calender. A second objective of the invention is to prevent generation of vibrations without substantially altering the printing characteristics of the fiber web.
The method and arrangement of the invention achieve the objectives defined above. The method of the invention for preventing vibrations in a multi-nip calender or multi-nip calender array comprises, in each multi-nip calender, a lower roll, an upper roll and two or more intermediate rolls between the lower roll and the upper roll. The fiber web can be conveyed through the roll nips of two or more multi-nip calenders with the roll nips closed. The intermediate rolls are equipped with load-relieving means and both the upper roll and the lower roll are equipped with loading means within the rolls, and loading means are connected to the lower roll and/or upper roll for loading said rolls from the outside in the direction of the calender plane. In a multi-nip calender or multi-nip calender array, the running parameters acting on the calendering impulse of one or more selected roll nips are modified continuously or periodically, with the overall calendering impulse of a calender or calender array and/or the quality variables of the fiber web remaining substantially constant or within predetermined limits.
The arrangement of the invention, in turn, comprises a control system and a measuring system, the control system comprising a calculation unit and a regulation unit. The regulation unit serves for continuous or periodic changes of the running parameters acting on the calendering impulse of selected one or more roll nips under the control commands from the calculation unit, so that the overall impulse of the calender or calender array and/or the quality variables of the fiber web remain substantially constant or within predetermined limits.
The invention is based on profiling the fiber web in a multi-nip calender by modifying periodically or continuously the profiling conditions and at the same time the calendering impulse in individual roll nips. However, considering a calender or a calender array as a whole, the overall calendering impulse received by the fiber web and the quality variables of the fiber web remain constantly within desired limits. This is achieved with the following procedure: when the running parameters of a calender, such as the support pressure exerted on the support arms by the load-relieving means of the intermediate rolls, the roll temperature etc. are modified into one direction in one roll nip, the same or different running parameters are modified in the inverse direction in a second roll nip, yet without modifying the quality variables in their totality after fiber web calendering in the calender or calender array. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the nip load is continuously or intermittently modified during the run of individual roll nips, with the overall nip load of a calender or calender array and/or the overall calendering angle remaining within the desired limits.
The notable advantage over known arrangements and methods for alleviating vibrations in multi-nip calenders achieved by the method of the invention is that, while the method prevents efficiently vibrations in a multi-nip calender by modification of the profilation of the fiber web in individual roll nips under varied calendering impulses in each nip, it still does not alter the quality characteristics of the fiber web or the overall calendering impulse received by the fiber web, with a given multi-nip calender or multi-nip calender array considered as a whole.
In this context, a calendering impulse stands for the profilation taking place in the fiber web in the roll nip under consideration, resulting in the desired finish, smoothness and density of the fiber web surface. The overall calendering impulse, in turn, implies the profilation process taking place in the fiber web in the calender or calender array under consideration.
The calendering impulse is influenced by the calender running parameters, consisting i.e. of the calender running speed, the speed of movement of the fiber web in the roll nips of the calender, the nip pressure prevailing in the roll nips, the longitudinal linear pressure profile of the roll, the moisture of the fiber web, the specific properties of the fiber web, etc. The principal calender running parameters relate to the compression and to the compression period of the fiber web, which act on the inherent structure of the fiber web, such as a paper web. The overall compression of the calender depends chiefly on the linear pressure prevailing in the roll nips, on the roll coatings and on the roll diameters. In a multi-nip calender, the overall compression period exerted by the calender on the fiber web, in turn, depends mainly on the nip lengths, the calender running speed and the number of nips, and among these adjustable running parameters, the calender running speed is easiest to use, determining the speed of movement of the fiber web in the roll nips of a multi-nip calender. The surface characteristics of paper, i.e. the finish, can be influenced with the moisture and temperature of the fiber web to be calendered, and also with the linear pressure profile parallel with the roll. The fiber web moisture during running can be varied by regulating the temperature of thermo-rolls and also with the use of web humidification means provided at the ends of the intermediate rolls, such as steamer boxes. Thermo-rolls are frequently provided in a multi-nip calender as alternating intermediate rolls between polymer-coated rolls. The linear pressure profile is controlled in a multi-nip calender by means of loading means within the upper and/or lower roll.
The running parameters of a multi-nip calender defined above can be considered not only for each individual calender or calender array, but also for each roll nip within one calender. In accordance with the invention, the running parameters are varied for each roll nip without, however, altering the actual calendering result (the quality variables of the fiber web and the overall calendering impulse) for each calender or calender array. The particular objective is to maintain the cumulative nip pressure substantially constant in each calender or calender array.
The invention is described in further detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
In the multi-nip calender shown in
The plane P passing through the upper and the lower roll and the intermediate rolls is called the plane of the set of rolls. The set of rolls has a substantially vertical plane. The design of the load-compensating means of the upper intermediate roll 31 is examined below. The load-compensating means of the remaining intermediate rolls have a similar design. The ends of the intermediate roll 3; 31 are fitted rotatably into their bearing houses 3a; 31a and support arms 3b; 31b are connected to these bearing houses by articulation to the frame at their articulation 31b′. Load-compensating means 3c; 31c, such as hydraulic cylinders, have been attached to the support arms 3b; 31c for raising and lowering the support arms 3b; 31c. Output rolls 8 have been connected to the bearing houses 3a of the intermediate rolls for taking the fiber web W from one roll nip to another in the multi-nip calender 1.
The upper roll 3; 30 and lower roll 3; 40 of the calender 1 are equipped with loading elements within said rolls for desired compensation of the deflection of the roll mantles. The loading elements provided within the rolls have a conventional design per se; the loading elements may consist e.g. of cylinder arrays, which can be controlled zone-wise by opening and closing liquid ducts leading to cylinders underneath the roll mantle in the roll nip. In a preferred embodiment, three longitudinal rows of hydraulic cylinders are provided within the rolls. The axes of the upper roll 3; 30 and the lower roll 3; 40 are disposed rotatably with their ends fitted in respective bearing housings 30a and 40a, and these bearing housings 30a and 40a are articulated over related loading arms 30b and 40b in the frame 4 of the calender 1. The upper roll and lower roll can be accordingly loaded parallel to the plane P of the set of rolls by loading means 30c and 40c, such as external hydraulic cylinders, attached above and underneath the rolls. The uppermost roll 3; 30 can be pressed downwardly by means of loading means 30; 30c, with the roll moving vertically downwardly, and the lowermost roll 3; 40, in turn, can be lifted upwards with loading means 40; 40c, and then the roll rises vertically upwards. When the lowermost roll is lifted upwardly and/or the uppermost rolls is pressed downwardly, the roll nips N; n1, n2, n3, n4, n5 n6, n7 between the rolls in a set of rolls, or at least some of them, close, while the desired nip pressure is generated in the roll nips N. The longitudinal nip pressure distribution (linear pressure distribution of the roll nips) is controlled with loading means provided within the upper roll 3; 30 and the lower roll 3; 40 (not shown in the figure).
Each intermediate roll 3; 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36 is subjected not only to the loading pressure exerted by the upper and/or lower roll 3; 30, 40, but also to the weight of auxiliary means, such as doctor blades, steamer boxes (not shown in the figures) fixed to bearing houses 3a provided at the ends of said intermediate rolls, and also to that of output rolls 8. The weight of the auxiliary means and of the rolls proper acting over the bearing housings on the ends of these rolls can be compensated completely or partly with hydraulic cylinders 3c fixed to support arms 3b connected to the bearing housings 3a of the intermediate rolls 3; 31-3; 36. Depending on the load relief of each intermediate roll 3, 31-3;36 and on the loading pressure of the upper and lower roll 3; 40, 30, the linear (overall) loading angle of the calender 1 can be altered as desired.
The loading angle α illustrates the overall nip load of the calender and the distribution of the overall nip load over the individual roll nips N. The nip forces prevailing in the roll nips N; n1 . . . n7 are adjusted so that the difference between the nip forces of the uppermost roll 3; 30 (upper roll) and the lowermost roll 3; 40 (lower roll) is at a given level in the calender, implying adjustment of the loading angle α. The linear overall load of the calender depends on the base load of the calender 1, i.e. on the weight of the intermediate rolls 3; 31-3; 36 proper and that of the related auxiliary means and on the additional load generated by the upper roll and the lower roll. In a preferred case, the weight exerted by each intermediate roll 3; 31-3; 36 and the auxiliary means connected to its ends (cf.
The nip load can be calculated separately for each roll nip N; n1 . . . n7 after the desired load angle α of the calender has been calculated. The nip load on the roll nip is calculated on the linear load angle α of the calender using the calculating means and calculating methods described in the WO patent application mentioned above. The linear load angle can be altered using the calculating means and calculating methods described in the WO patent application mentioned above, and so is the distribution of the (overall) load angle between the individual roll nips n1 to n7. Thus, in the multi-nip calender illustrated in
The aim is to keep the running parameters 9 selected in the method of the invention for acting on the overall calendering impulse 11 constant by comparing the value of the overall calendering impulse 11 evaluated or determined on the measured running parameters 9 with a predetermined set value 12 for the overall calendering impulse 11 and by keeping the difference variable 13 between the overall calendering impulse 11 and its set value 12 thus obtained at a minimum value (close to zero). Instead of the overall calendering impulse 11, one could also monitor only some partial variables of the overall calendering impulse 11, such as the overall pressure prevailing in the roll nips (cf.
In addition to or instead of the overall calendering impulse 11 or its partial variables mentioned above, it is also possible to monitor the changes of selected quality variables 21 of a fiber web, such as a paper web, and to perform compensation of the running parameters 9 entirely or partly on the basis of predicted (evaluated) and/or measured changes of the quality variables. Carrying out periodic or intermittent changes of the first running parameters 9, which act on the calendering impulse and/or the quality variables in the first roll nips and prevent vibrations in a multi-nip calender 1, involves measurement or evaluation of the influence of such changes on the quality variables of the fiber web, such as the smoothness and density of the paper web on the calender level. This is followed by changes of the other running parameters 9, whose influence on the calendering impulse and/or the quality variables of the fiber web in the other roll nips compensates for the changes caused by the first running parameters in the calendering impulse and/or quality variables of the first roll nips. The changes to be made in the other roll nips are evaluated on the basis of quality variables 21 of the fiber web as measured or predicted after the calender.
As a variant of the manner of controlling a multi-nip calender 1 described above, changing the running parameters 9, such as the nip pressure, in specific roll nips, prevents vibrations in a multi-nip calender. These changes of the running parameters 9 are compensated merely on the basis of changes of the quality variables 21 measured in the fiber web W; if the measured values of the quality variables 21 of the fiber web do not show any substantial differences from the set values 22 of these quality variables, there will be no need for compensating for changes of the running parameters 9 with a view to prevent vibrations. If, however, the difference variable 23 between the measured values 21 and the set values 22 grows too much due to changes of the running parameters 9, the changes are compensated, as described above, by means of the calculation unit 51 and the regulation unit 52.
If, instead of changes of the overall calendering impulse 11, changes of the overall nip pressure are measured and evaluated as described above in connection with
Only a number of embodiments of the invention have been described above, and it is obvious to those skilled in the art that the invention can be implemented in many other ways as well without departing from the inventive idea defined in the claims.
Thus, the method for preventing vibrations in a multi-nip calender as described with respect to one single multi-nip calender above can be extended to an array of several multi-nip calenders, which is controlled by a control system for preventing vibrations similar to the one described above. Changes are then monitored at the level of the calender array; when the running parameters of individual roll nips of a calender are changed in order to prevent vibrations, the compensating changes of the running parameters can be performed in the same calender or in a different one, with the overall calendering impulse and/or the quality variables of the fiber web remaining at the desired values in the calender array under consideration.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20031735 | Nov 2003 | FI | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/FI2004/000720 | 11/26/2004 | WO | 00 | 1/25/2006 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2005/052254 | 6/9/2005 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3199442 | Kuno et al. | Aug 1965 | A |
4903517 | Van Haag et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
5961899 | Rossetti et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6615709 | Suomi et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6857356 | van Haag et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
100 36 574 | Jul 2000 | DE |
0 779 394 | Jun 1997 | EP |
WO 9850628 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO 2005052254 | Jun 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060124001 A1 | Jun 2006 | US |