The application is a National Stage of International Application No. PCT/NO01/00421, file Oct. 22, 2001, which published in the English language and is an international filing of Norway Application No. 20005318, filed on Oct. 20, 2000. Priority is claimed.
The present invention relates to downhole separation of hydrocarbons and water followed by discrete (separate) transportation of the fluids to a subsea wellhead for further processing, especially avoiding use of downhole rotating machinery as far as possible. The invention relates in a first aspect to utilisation of the pressure energy in the water phase for injection into an underground formation. In a second aspect the invention relates to utilisation of the pressure energy of the water phase or the hydrocarbon phase to power equipment on the seabed. It relates in a third aspect to a method of controlling the downhole separator. In a fourth aspect it relates to a method and an arrangement of supplying gas for lifting the produced water to the wellhead.
Capital and operational expenses of subsea developments, especially in deep waters, are high. Simple and reliable equipment is therefore important. Well maintenance costs are high due to the high intervention cost. Reliability of all this equipment is therefore a key word for success.
Flow assurance is of utmost importance for field economics. Water in the hydrocarbon stream is one of the frequent causes of flow related problems. Removing water will reduce possible hydrate formation and allow using flow lines with smaller diameter at reduced cost. Power needed for pressure boosting will be reduced due to the lower bulk flow and density.
Water is almost always present in the rock formation where hydrocarbons are found. The reservoir will normally produce an increasing portion of water with increase time. Water generates several problems for the oil and gas production process. It influences the specific gravity of the crude flow by dead weight. It transports the elements that generate scaling in the flow path. It forms the basis for hydrate formation, and it increases the capacity requirements for flowlines and topside separation units. Hence, if water could be removed from the well flow even before it reaches the wellhead, several problems can be avoided. Furthermore, oil and gas production can be enhanced and oil accumulation can be increased since increased lift can be obtained with removal of the produced water fraction.
A downhole hydrocyclone based separation system can be applied for both vertically and horizontally drilled wells, and may be installed in any position. Use of liquid-liquid (oil-water) cyclone separation is only appropriate with higher water-cuts (typical with water continuous wellfluid). Water suitable for re-injection to the reservoir can be provided by such a system. Cyclones are associated with purifying one phase only, which will be the water-phase in a downhole application. Using a multistage separation cyclone separation system, such as described in pending Norwegian patent application NO 2000 0816 of the same applicant will reduce water entrainment in the oil phase. However, pure oil will normally not be achieved by use of cyclones. Furthermore, energy is taken from the well fluid and is consumed for setting up a centrifugal field within the cyclones, thereby creating a pressure drop.
A downhole gravity separator is associated with a well specially designed for its application. A horizontal or a slightly deviated section of the well will provide sufficient retention time and a stratified flow regime, required for oil and water to separate due to density difference.
Separation of water from the hydrocarbon flow is therefore important. Such separation can be done at the seafloor and downhole. The separation process is however proven to be much more efficient downhole than at the seafloor. Such separation is also done more efficiently in each well bore than on the commingled well fluid from several wells. Downhole removal of water from the hydrocarbon flow, giving a less dense column, will result in a higher pressure available at the seabed. This will result in less need for pressure boosting for flow line transportation. Separation should therefore, if well conditions permit, rather be arranged downhole than subsea.
In copending Norwegian Patent Application No. 2000 1446 a system is described, in which a downhole turbine/pump hydraulic converter is used to inject the water into the formation to increase the pressure in the formation and thereby achieve more hydrocarbon output from the reservoir. This system is specially suitable for application in low to medium pressure wells, in which the water injection can increase the output.
However, in high pressure wells it is usually not of major benefit to inject water. Thus, a different system is needed for such wells. Since all rotating machinery (pumps and compressors) are among the most unreliable pieces of equipment of field developments, it is desirable to avoid such machinery downhole, where access and monitoring is difficult. In designing a system for exploitation of high pressure well it is therefor an object to avoid downhole rotating machinery as far as possible.
The alternative, locating the equipment topside, i.e. on the platform, is, as mentioned above, not a very good solution either. This calls for a subsea location of at least a part of such equipment.
However, downhole separation has major benefits over topside or subsea separation. This is due to the fact that the pressure gradient of hydrocarbons is steeper than the pressure gradient of the water. Downhole separation of the reservoir fluid thus gives a higher pressure of the hydrocarbons at the seabed than the total reservior fluid. A higher pressure means that the hydrocarbons can be transported over a further distance without additional pressure boosting or with less pressure boosting, than in the case of separation at the seabed or topside.
The present invention is therefore allowing various combinations of a downhole separation system with subsea location of all rotating machinery. If artificial lift would be necessary, in particular late in the well's lifetime, a gas lift system should be applied rather than a downhole pump.
Gas lift of the mixed well flow path is standard practice. In the well known method gas is injected in the well flow at some distance below the well head, resulting in a reduction of the specific gravity of the combined gas and well fluid. This further results in a reduction of the inflow pressure in the well bore and an increased flow rate. As the pressure is reduced higher up in the production tubing, further increasing the gas volume, the gravity is even more reduced, helping the flow substantially. The gas is normally injected into the annulus through a pressure controlled inlet valve, into the production tubing at a suitable elevation. The elevation is mainly depending on available gas pressure.
However, it has not been suggested until now to use gas for artificial lift of the water. According to an aspect of the present invention this is one way of ensuring a sufficient pressure of the water at the seabed, while avoiding pumps or the like downhole.
The pressure drop of well fluid during flow from the bottom hole to the seabed is determined by the following equation:
Δp=ρmixgΔh+kρmixQmix2 (1),
wherein Δp is the pressure drop, ρmix is the density of the combined phases of the well fluid, Δh is the depth from the seabed to the bottom hole, k is a constant (depending on inter alia the physical structures of the flow line and Qmix is the flow rate.
The first term (ρmixgΔh) is the static part of the pressure drop, while the second term (kρmixQmix2) is the dynamic part of the pressure drop.
The density of the well fluid is determined by the following equation:
ρmix=(ρgQg+ρoQo+ρwQw)/(Qg+Qo+Qw) (2),
wherein ρg, ρo and ρw are the densities of gas, oil and water and Qg, Qo and Qw are the flow rates of gas, oil and water.
Since the densities of the three phases are increasing in the following order: ρg, ρo and ρw, a removal of the water from the well fluid will reduce the density of the remaining phases and thereby reduce the pressure loss, i.e. the pressure gradient is steeper. Injection of gas into the water will reduce the density of the combined phases (gas-water) and thereby reduce the pressure loss. However, a limitation on the amount of gas feasible for injection is limited by the second term of equation (1). Since the dynamic pressure drop is increasing by Q2 the injection of gas above a certain amount will (at least in theory) increase the pressure drop. In other words: the use of gas for artificial lift will increase frictional pressure drop since the total volume flow increases with gas being brought back to the host. At long tie-back distances the net effect of using gas lift becomes low when gain in static pressure is reduced by increased dynamic pressure drop. However, downhole gas lift can be accomplished locally at the production area by separating and compressing a suitable rate of gas taken from the well fluid and distributing the gas to the subsea wells for injection. This recycling of gas reduces the amount of gas flowing in the pipeline, compared to supplying gas from the host. The advantage of this can be utilized by increasing the production rate from the wells, reducing pipeline size or increasing capacity by having additional wells producing via the pipeline. In addition to this, gas lift at the riserbase will become more effective with this configuration.
The present invention therefor suggests in one aspect of the invention, applying downhole separation in combination with gas lift of the separated water. As this water is lifted to surface it can be routed to an injection well or discharged to sea. If discharge to sea or a very low pressurized discharge zone is allowed, the energy available in the water flow path can be run through a turbine to typically power a pump or a compressor.
The invention will now be explained in further detail referring to the accompanying drawings showing exemplifying embodiments for illustration purposes, in which:
a illustrates a layout of downhole separation of fluid from an underground formation, transportation of hydrocarbons and water to a subsea manifold, and subsequent injection of water into another formation according to a first embodiment of the invention.
b illustrates a second embodiment of the present invention, which is a variation of the embodiment of
c illustrates a third embodiment of the present invention, which is a variation of the embodiment of
a illustrates a layout of downhole separation of fluid from an underground formation, transportation of hydrocarbons and water to a subsea manifold, and subsequent injection of water into another formation, using gas lift of the water according to a fourth embodiment of the invention.
b illustrates a fifth embodiment of the invention, which is a variation of
a illustrates a layout of downhole separation of fluid from an underground formation, transportation of hydrocarbons and water to a subsea manifold, and subsequent injection of water into another formation, using gas lift of the water with gas supplied from a distant source, according to a sixth embodiment of the invention.
b illustrates a seventh embodiment of the present invention, which is a variation of
a illustrates a layout of downhole separation of fluid from an underground formation, transportation of hydrocarbons and water to a subsea manifold, and subsequent injection of water into another formation, using gas lift of the water, with gas in a closed circuit and de-gassing of the water, according to an eighth embodiment of the invention.
b illustrates a ninth embodiment of the present invention, which is a variation of
First
Even though the water arrives at the seabed with a lower pressure PWS, the pressure of the water is substantially higher than the hydrostatic pressure PWHS at the seabed level.
The water is to be injected into an injection zone I, which has a pressure PI, equal to the hydrostatic pressure of water at the same elevation. The water pressure PWS may be too high for injection directly.
In
The pressure gradient GWG illustrates the situation when gas is introduced to the water at an injection point IP downhole. This gradient GWG is much steeper than the hydrostatic gradient GWH of the water. The water is thus arriving at a pressure of PWG at the seabed. This pressure may be choked to a pressure PWGC, which is suitable for injection, shown by the arrow E. The arrow H illustrates the injection into the injection zone I and the arrow J illustrates the drawdown of the injection zone.
a illustrates a layout of a production manifold and well according to a first embodiment of the present invention. The layout illustrates production of fluid from an underground formation F and transportation of the fluid to the subsea manifold.
Hydrocarbons (oil and in some cases gas) mixed with water is emanating from the reservoir F flows via sand screens 1 into the well, and is transported in a tubing 2 to a downhole separator 3 where the water phase and hydrocarbon phase are separated. The separator 3 may be of gravity or centrifugal type. The water phase and hydrocarbons phase of the well fluid are transported to the wellhead 6 in separate flow channels 4, 5. Typically the hydrocarbons will be routed to a production tubing 4 whilst the water is routed to the annulus 5 formed between the production casing and the production tubing. Alternatively, in a dual completion system both phases will be brought to the seabed in individual production tubes.
Using a dual function x-mas tree 6 facilitates production and control of two discrete flows from the well to the a subsea manifold system. A choke valve 7 is provided after the x-mas tree 6 in the hydrocarbon flow line, and is used for controlling the well fluid production rate. A choke valve 8 is provided after the x-mas tree in the water flow line, and is used for controlling the rate of water extracted from the downhole separator 3.
Both fluid flows, hydrocarbons and water, are supplied to separate headers 12, 17 in the manifold via a mechanical multibore connector 9a. In the case the producing well is a satellite well rather than a well placed into a template, flowlines will connect the well to the manifold. The figure shows three producing wells connected to the manifold.
The hydrocarbon phase is routed into a first manifold header 12 via an isolation valve 10a. The header is illustrated with a connector 14 and a full bore isolation valve 13 allowing hook-up to another manifold and a connector 15 at the opposite end, connecting to a flow line 16 for transportation of the produced hydrocarbons to a host platform or another receiver.
Subsea processing such as multiphase pressure boosting and gas liquid separation may be incorporated into the described concept.
The water phase is routed into a second manifold header 17 via an isolation valve 11a. The header is illustrated with a connector 19 and a full bore isolation valve 18 allowing hook-up to another manifold.
The water from the production wells is routed via an insulation valve 20 to a third header 21 being in connection with one or several injection wells (only one leading into a reservoir 28 is fully shown). The injection header 21 is illustrated connected to two injection wells, located within a subsea template, by single bore connectors 23a, 23b. The connector 23a is shown connected to a choke valve 24, a wellhead 25, a tubing 26 and an underground zone or reservoir 28. The water is distributed to the wellhead 25 of the injection wells via the choke valve 24 and routed via the tubing or casing 26 to a suitable underground zone 28 for disposal.
Alternatively the formation 28 may be a hydrocarbon producing zone with a substantially lower pressure than the formation F, for sweep or for increasing the pressure in the formation 28, to increase the hydrocarbon output.
The feasibility of this concept requires that the producing reservoir F has a sufficiently high pressure to overcome pressure drop related to inflow losses from the producing formation F into the production well, dynamical friction losses along the flow path and outflow losses from the bottom of the injection well into the disposal formation.
It also requires that the pressure of the separated water at the seabed is sufficiently high to overcome the counterpressure from the formation 28, into which the water is to be injected. In case the pressure is not sufficiently high, a pump may be installed, which is to be explained below.
b illustrates a layout of a production manifold and well according to a second embodiment of the present invention. The layout is similar to
The concept is shown with a turbine 31 installed in second header 17 and mechanically connected to a multiphase pump 32 installed into the first header 12. A by-pass and utility system is not shown, but may be present. The water flowing into the second header 17 is driving the turbine 31 into rotation, the rotation is transmitted via a shaft to the pump 32, which in turn is pressurising the hydrocarbons. This pressurising of the hydrocarbons will provide for a longer transport distance for the hydrocarbons before additional pumps must be provided, and/or a larger through-put of hydrocarbons.
In the case of separation of the hydrocarbons into a gas phase and a oil phase downhole or at the seabed, the turbine may alternatively drive a single phase pump or compressor to pressurise the oil flow or the gas flow.
After the pressurising of the hydrocarbons in the turbine/pump converter 31, 32, the water is led to the third header 21 and injected, as explained in connection with
A deep reservoir producing a light condensate will most likely have higher pressure at the seabed than what is required for natural flow to the receiver (i.e. host platform, floater etc.). Therefore, as an alternative to providing a turbine in the second header 17, transporting water, and a pump 32 in the first header 12, transporting hydrocarbons, the turbine may be provided in the first header 12 and the pump in the second header 17. In this case a turbine in the hydrocarbon flow can provide required energy for re-injecting the produced water into the producing reservoir, or formation 28 suitable for disposal. This is especially advantageously if the water has a too low pressure for injection and needs to be pressurized.
c illustrates a layout of a production manifold and well according to a third embodiment of the present invention. The layout is similar to
The feasibility of this concept requires that the water phase can be brought from the formation to the suction side of the pump 29 with a net positive suction head in excess of what is required to avoid cavitation. At high water depths the outlined concept is likely to be physically possible even though the producing reservoir is depleted far below initial or even below hydrostatic pressure.
a illustrates a layout of a production manifold and well according to a fourth embodiment of the present invention. The layout is similar to
A branch line 37a with an isolation valve 37 is connected to the first header 12. The branch line 37 is further connected to a gas-liquid separator 40. From the gas-liquid separator 40 a gas outlet line 41a and a liquid outlet line 38a are extending. The gas outlet line 41a is branching into a gas return line 41b and a gas supply line 42a, which is connected to a fourth header 49 through a control valve 42. The gas return line 41b is connected to the liquid outlet line 38a. The liquid outlet line 38a is further connected to the first header 12 via an isolation valve 38. In the first header 12, between the branch line 37a and the liquid return line a by-pass valve 36 is provided.
The fourth header 49 is further connected to the x-mas tree 6 via an isolation valve 46, the multibore connector 9a and a choke valve 47. From the x-mas tree 6 the gas is fed through a tubing 48 and into the water pipeline 5.
Gas for lift is extracted from the produced hydrocarbon phase. Fluid from the header 12 is routed to the retrievable gas-liquid separator 40 via the multibore mechanical connector 39 by opening the isolation valve 37 and closing the by-pass valve 36. A control valve 41 regulated the rate of gas extracted from the separator 40 with the objective of maintaining a suitable gas-liquid interface level within the separator 40. A control valve 42 is adjusted for a suitable rate of gas to be fed to the gas injection header (fourth header) 49. The surplus gas is fed into the gas return line 41b, commingled with the liquid from the separator 40 and returned to the hydrocarbon header (first header) 12 via the isolation valve 38. The gas injection header (fourth header) 49 is shown provided with a connector 44 and an isolation valve 45 at one end. This facilitates a connection of the fourth header to other manifolds or further wells.
Gas from the fourth header 49 is routed to the production x-mas tree 6, and to the wells connected to connectors 9b and 9c. A suitable rate is regulated by a choke valve 47. The depth of the injection point where gas is commingled with the water is chosen with respect to available gas pressure. Because of the added gas, which has a substantial lower density than the water, the overall bulk density of the column is reduced and the commingled water/gas flow will arrive at the wellhead with a higher pressure than the water would have had without gas lift. In addition the gas will expand as the pressure is decreasing during the travel to the well head, resulting in a further decrease of the density, and thus a further decrease in pressure drop. The gas utilized for lift will follow the water phase into the second header and third header, and is in this discharged into the injection wells and the formation 28.
This production concept is illustrated with the total produced hydrocarbon flow. In alternative configurations a split flow or production from a single well may be used to provide gas for artificial lift of the water.
b illustrates a similar layout to
a illustrates a layout of a production manifold and well according to a sixth embodiment of the present invention.
The manifold comprises in addition to the first header 12 and second header 17, an additional header 49, which corresponds to the fourth header in the embodiments of
The header is also connected to a gas supply line 50 via a connector 51 and an isolation valve 52. The gas supply line may be a service umbilical.
The gas supply line 50 is supplying gas from a distant source, e.g. a gas producing well, which is fed into the fourth header 49 via the connector 51 and the isolation valve 52 and further into the water tubing 5 via the isolation valve 46, the connector 9a, the choke valve 47, the x-mas tree 6 and the gas tubing 48.
In comparing the layout of
In other respects the embodiment of
b is illustrating a layout of a seventh embodiment of the present invention, which is similar to the embodiment of
The produced water with gas used for artificial lift can be re-injected by use of the subsea speed controlled multiphase pump 53. The pump is shown retrievable and integrated into the subsea manifold between the produced water header 17 and the water injection header 21 by a mechanical connector 30.
This embodiment is applicable when the pressure inherent in the water at the seabed and the lift created by the gas insertion are not enough to inject the water into the formation 28 against the counter pressure in this formation. The pump 53 will create the extra pressure needed.
a illustrates a layout of an eighth embodiment, which in some respects is similar to the embodiment of
The embodiment of
The second header is connected to a gas-liquid separator 54 via an isolation valve 20 and a connector 58. The gas-liquid separator 54 has a gas outlet line 54a, a liquid outlet line 54b and a gas supplement line 54c. The gas outlet line is connected to the fourth header via a compressor 57. The liquid outlet line is connected to the connector 23a and from this to the well leading into the formation 28. The gas supplement line is connected to a gas supply line 50 via an isolation valve 55.
a illustrates the concept of de-gassing the produced water at the seabed and re-cycling the gas for artificial lift of the produced water. The produced water containing the gas lift gas is routed from the second header 17 to the gas-liquid separator 54 via the multibore connector 58. The gas extracted from the separator 54 is pressurized in the compressor 57 and discharged into the fourth header (gas lift header) 49 via the connector 58, and further distributed to the producing wells, and as illustrated into the water tubing 5 via the gas tubing 48. The de-gassed water is fed via the liquid outlet line 54b and the connectors 58 and 23a to the water injection well and the formation 28. The gas regained from the water is again fed into the fourth header 49. The separator 54 and compressor 57 with interconnecting piping is shown as a retrievable unit.
For make-up and for initial start-up gas may be supplied via the gas supply line by opening the isolation valve 55. The line 50 may be a service umbilical line leading from a distant source or a line leading from a de-gasser (not shown), extracting gas from the produced hydrocarbons.
In case some of the gas is lost during this process, or in case more gas than needed is retrieved from the water, gas may be supplied or withdrawn from the gas supply line 50 by opening the isolation valve 55.
The water may also optionally be discharged to the surrounding sea, instead of or supplemental to disposal in an underground formation, provided it has sufficient pressure, and that de-oiling cyclones are utilized to meet required oil-in-water entrainment requirement.
b illustrated in a ninth embodiment a similar concept as described in
All the described production alternatives can be enhanced as required to include subsea processing equipment for gas-liquid separation, further hydrocarbon-water separation by use of electrostatic coalescing, single phase liquid pumping, single phase gas compression and multiphase pumping. In case of subsea gas-liquid separation, gas may be routed to one flowline whilst the liquid is routed to the other. Any connector may be of horizontal or vertical type. Return and supply lines may be routed through a common multibore connector or be distributed using independent connectors. As an alternative to inject the water into a different well than the production well, the water may be injected into the production well and disposed of in a formation at a higher elevation, with low pressure.
Instead of injecting the water into a formation, the water may, according to regulations, purity of the water, environmental conditions and available polishing equipment, be disposed of to seawater. To be able to do this the water must be de-gassed and optionally polished to remove environmentally hazardous compounds.
Choke valves may be located on the x-mas tree as shown in attached figures, but can also be located on the manifold. The valves may if required be independent retrievable items. Subsea choke valves are normally hydraulic operated but may be electrical operated for application where a quick response is needed.
Electrically operated pumps are not illustrated in attached figures with utility systems for re-cycling, pressure compensation and refill. One pump only is shown for each functional requirement. However, depending on flowrates, pressure increase or power arrangement with several pumps connected in parallel or series may be appropriate.
The present invention also provides for any working combination of the embodiments shown herein. The invention is limited only by the enclosed claims and equivalents thereof.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20005318 | Oct 2000 | NO | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/NO01/00421 | 10/22/2001 | WO | 00 | 4/21/2003 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO02/33218 | 4/25/2002 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4189923 | Berg | Feb 1980 | A |
4824447 | Goldsberry | Apr 1989 | A |
5339905 | Dowker | Aug 1994 | A |
5431228 | Weingarten et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5450901 | Ellwood | Sep 1995 | A |
5501279 | Garg et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5794697 | Wolflick et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5988275 | Brady et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6048462 | Daskopoulos et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6092599 | Berry et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6189614 | Brady et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6336504 | Alhanati et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6547005 | Haheim | Apr 2003 | B1 |
20030019633 | Podio et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1041243 | Oct 2000 | EP |
2326895 | Jan 1999 | GB |
2346936 | Aug 2000 | GB |
304388 | Feb 1998 | NO |
WO 9841304 | Sep 1998 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040069494 A1 | Apr 2004 | US |