The described below relates to wireless communication systems wherein relaying is used to enhance performance. In particular, the technology described below relates to a method and arrangement for providing diversity in a wireless communication system utilizing Orthogonal Frequency Domain Multiplexing (OFDM) technology.
A main striving force in the development of wireless/cellular communication networks and systems is to provide, apart from many other aspects, increased coverage or support of higher data rate, or a combination of both. At the same time, the cost aspect of building and maintaining the system is of great importance and is expected to become even more so in the future. As data rates and/or communication distances are increased, the problem of increased battery consumption is another area of concern.
Until recently the main topology of wireless communication systems has been fairly unchanged, including the three existing generations of cellular networks. The topology of existing wireless communication systems is characterized by the cellular architecture with the fixed radio base stations and the mobile stations as the only transmitting and receiving entities in the networks typically involved in a communication session.
Several new transmission, or radio access, technologies have been proposed to increase capacity, flexibility and/or coverage in the communication systems. A promising technology is Orthogonal Frequency Domain Multiplexing (OFDM) that transmits multiple signals simultaneously over a wired or wireless communication medium. In wireless communications, the OFDM receiver is relative simple, since the multiple data streams are transmitted over a number of parallel flat fading channels. In fact, equalization is not done in the time domain; instead, one-tap filters in the frequency domain are sufficient. Despite this simplicity, uncoded OFDM transmission lacks inherent diversity that greatly helps to combat loss in the radio propagation environment, i.e. path loss, fast fading, etc.
One way to introduce diversity in the received signal is to utilize multiple antennas at the transmitter and possibly also at the receiver. The use of multiple antennas offers significant diversity and multiplexing gains relative to single antenna systems. A system utilizing multiple antennas both at the transmitter and at the receiver is often referred to as Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) wireless systems. The spatial diversity offered by such systems can thus improve the link reliability and the spectral efficiency relative to Single-Input Single-Output (SISO) system.
An alternative approach to introduce macro-diversity is cooperative relaying. Cooperative relaying systems have many features and advantages in common with the more well-known multihop networks, wherein typically, in a wireless scenario, a communication involves a plurality of transmitting and receiving entities in a relaying configuration. Such systems offer possibilities of significantly reduced path loss between communicating (relay) entities, which may benefit the end-to-end (ETE) users. The cooperative relaying systems are typically limited to only two (or a few) hop relaying. A typical cooperative relaying system comprises of an access point, for example a radio base station which communicates with one or more user equipments, for example a mobile station, via a plurality of relay nodes.
In contrast to multihop networks, cooperative relaying systems exploits aspects of parallelism and also adopts themes from advanced antenna systems. These systems have cooperation among multiple stations or relay nodes, as a common denominator. In recent research literature, several names are in use, such as cooperative diversity, cooperative coding, and virtual antenna arrays. In the present application the terms “cooperative relaying system” and “cooperative schemes/methods” is meant to encompass all systems and networks utilizing cooperation among multiple stations and the schemes/methods used in these systems, respectively. The term “relaying system” is meant to encompass all systems and networks utilizing relying in any form, for example multihop system and cooperative relaying systems. A comprehensive overview of cooperative communication schemes are given in Cooperative Diversity in Wireless Networks: Algorithms and Architectures, J. N. Laneman, Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass., August 2002.
Various formats of a relayed signal may be deployed. A signal may be decoded, re-modulated and forwarded, or alternatively simply amplified and forwarded. The former is known as decode-and-forward or regenerative relaying, whereas the latter is known as amplify-and-forward, or non-regenerative relaying. Both regenerative and non-regenerative relaying is well known, e.g. by traditional multihopping and repeater solutions respectively. Various aspects of the two approaches are addressed in “An Efficient Protocol for Realizing Distributed Spatial Diversity in Wireless Ad-Hoc Networks”, J. N. Laneman and G. W. Wornell, Proc. of ARL FedLab Symposium on Advanced Telecommunications and Information Distribution (ATIRP-2001), (College Park, Md.), March 2001.
Diversity gain is particularly attractive since it offers increased robustness of communication performance as well as allowing reduction of experienced average SNR for the same BER. In addition the cooperative relaying may provide other positive effects such as beamforming (or directivity) gain, and spatial multiplexing gain. The general benefits of the mentioned gains include higher data rates, reduced outage primarily due to different forms of diversity, increased battery life, and extended coverage.
There are several schemes that offer diversity gain: Alamouti diversity based cooperative relaying for example described in “Distributed Space-Time Coding in Cooperative Networks”, P. A. Anghel et al, Proc. of the Nordic Signal Processing Symp., Norway, October 2002. coherent combining based relaying, which in addition offer a beamforming gain as described in “Large-Scale Cooperative Relay Network with Optimal Coherent Combining under Aggregate Relay Power Constraints”, P. Larsson, Proc. Future Telecommunications Conference (FTC2003), Beijing, China, 9-10/12 2003. pp 166-170. and relay cyclic delay diversity as described in WO06121381. According to the scheme the relay nodes, in their forwarding between the base station and the user equipment, applies cyclic shifts to their respective forwarded OFDM symbols.
These schemes require two transmission phases for each down link (DL) and up link (UL) direction: for example in the DL, in the first transmission phase the basestation transmits to the relay node, and in the second transmission phase the relay node transmits to the user equipment. The two phase transmission methods may effectively reduce the data throughput by half.
Significant shortcomings of the prior art are evident from the above. Hence, it would be desirable to provide a method that introduces artificial frequency, time and spatial diversity and requires only a single transmission phase for each direction in a cooperative relaying wireless communication system.
An object of the technology described below is to provide a method, a relay node and a system that overcomes the drawbacks of the prior art techniques.
The problem is solved by performing communication in a communication system utilizing relaying and Orthogonal Frequency Domain Multiplexing (OFDM). Consider a transmitting radio node scenario, for example a radio base station is engaged in communication with at least one receiving radio node, for example a user equipment. Part of the communication between the transmitting and receiving node is direct, and part is via at least one relay node. Data is transmitted in the form of OFDM chunks comprising a plurality of OFDM symbols. A cyclic prefix is added to a representation of an OFDM during the transmission phase by:
The first step can be seen as providing a column-wise cyclic prefix, and the second step as providing a row-wise cyclic prefix, resulting in a 2-dimensional cyclic prefix procedure.
The number of rows selected to be copied to the top of the augmented chunk should correspond to the length of the cyclic prefix or guard interval which depends on the delay spread of the radio channels.
One example embodiment comprises the steps of:
In the relaying performed by one or more relay nodes the re-transmission is delayed with one OFDM symbol.
A transmitter is adapted for use in a radio node in a communication system utilizing relaying and Orthogonal Frequency Domain Multiplexing. The transmitter comprises a cyclic prefix module adapted for adding a 2 dimensional cyclic prefix to a representation of the OFDMA chunks, by pre-appending to a representation of the OFDM chunk the last OFDM symbol of the representation of the OFDM chunk, and copying the last rows of the pre-appended OFDM chunk to the top of the pre-appended OFDM chunk, forming an augmented OFDM chunk.
Thanks to the technology described, it is possible to take full advantage of the combined advantages of the OFDM technique and cooperative relaying, without increasing the complexity of the transmitter and receivers in any significant way. Neither does the novel method require any extensive control signaling that could reduce the traffic capacity. In contrast to prior art techniques only one transmission phase is needed.
The 2D-CP method and arrangements can provide substantial Data Rate increase in the order of (2M−2)/M, wherein M is the number of OFDM symbols in the chunk. For example, if M=15 then the gain is approximately 93%.
A further advantage is that antenna specific pilots are not required. Instead, the same pilot pattern on the frequency/time grid are to be transmitted from all transmit antennas. The receiver, user equipment, for example, has knowledge of the pilot pattern so that channel estimates can be obtained.
A still further advantage is increased frequency and time selectivity of the overall effective channel.
Other objects, advantages and novel features will become apparent from the following detailed description when considered in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and claims.
a and 1b illustrates schematically a cellular system using cooperative relaying wherein the method and arrangement may be advantageously implemented;
a-f illustrates the transmission phase for 1-hop systems (a-b), 2-hop systems (c-d) and 2-hop systems utilizing the 2D-;
Non-limiting, example embodiments will now be described with reference to the figures.
The network outlined in
The real world cellular system outlined in
Each of radio nodes, i.e. BS 110, RN 115 and UE 120 utilizes of one or more antennas. The BS 110 transmits to K RNs and to the UE during a predefined period. The RN forwards the information received from a first node (e.g. BS 110) to a second node (e.g. UE) with one symbol delayed. This can be done either with amplify and forward, decode and forward, or a hybrid of the two.
a-f illustrates the difference between the 1-hop, classical 2-hop and the 2D-CP system. As shown in
The transmission scheme is illustrated in
The method comprises the steps of:
The relaying performed by the relay node or nodes in step 325 does not require a 2-dimensional processing as in the receiver and transmitter, one-dimensional FFTs and an IFFT, for the receiving and transmitting respectively, are sufficient. Hence, a relay node employed in a system can be (but need not be) identical to a relay node in prior art relayed OFDM systems.
The transmission process according to the method is further illustrated in
The arrangements in a receiver and transmitter have been described in terms of modules and blocks. The modules and blocks are to be regarded as functional parts of a transmitting and/or receiving node in a communication system, and not necessarily as physical objects by themselves. The modules and blocks are at least partly preferably implemented as software code executed by a computer, to be adapted to effectuate the method. The term “comprising” does primarily refer to a logical structure and the term “connected” should here be interpreted as links between functional parts and not necessarily physical connections. However, depending on the chosen implementation, certain modules may be realized as physically distinctive objects in a receiver or transmitter.
The mathematical definitions of the terms used in the application will be given and exemplified in the following section:
Notation:
Let ● and denote the Hadamard and the Kronecker product, respectively. (·)T denotes the transpose and (∩)H the Hermitian transpose operator. Capital letters represent matrices, and lower case letters represent vectors or scalars.
Definition 1: FM denotes the FFT matrix of size M×M. The (n,m)th element of FM, for n, mε{1, 2, . . . , M} is given by
Definition 2: For an M×1 vector a=[a(1), a(2), . . . , a(M)]T, the right circulant matrix
is generated as follows
The right circulant matrix A is diagonalized using the FFT matrix FM as follows
A=√{square root over (M)}FMHD(FMa)FM (3)
where D(x) denotes a diagonal matrix with x on its main diagonal.
Definition 3: The two dimensional (2D) FFT of a matrix X of size N×M, denoted by {tilde over (X)}, is given by
{tilde over (X)}=FNXFM (4)
An illustrative example of the usefulness of the method and arrangements will be given with reference to
Under this assumption, the received symbol ym at the UE is a linear combination of the transmitted symbol xm from the BS and the delayed symbol xm-1 transmitted from the RNs. ym can be expressed as:
ym=H0x1+(m-1)
where H0=Circ(h0) is the channel matrix between the BS transmit antenna and the UE, He is the combined channel matrix, or effective channel matrix, from all K RNs to the UE. He can be expressed as:
where hk for kε{1, 2, . . . , K} denotes the channel impulse response from the kth RN to the UE. he is the effective channel impulse response and its FFT can be expressed as:
Ignoring the first received symbol of the chunk at the UE, the M following received symbols from the same chunk can be written in a matrix form as follows:
Define the following
Y=[y1, y2, . . . , yM], (8)
X=[x1, x2, . . . , xM], (9)
H=[h0, he, 0, . . . , 0]. (10)
Then it can be shown that the received signal after applying a 2D-FFT is given by:
{tilde over (Y)}=√{square root over (NM)}{tilde over (H)}·B, (11)
where {tilde over (H)} and {tilde over (Y)} denote the 2D-FFT of the channel matrix H and the received data block Y.
The example embodiments have been envisaged in a two hop cooperative relaying scenario. The method and arrangement may advantageously be utilized also in other systems wherein a plurality of nodes are engaged in a communication session, for example a multihop system. In a typical multihop system a majority of the nodes are user equipment of various kinds, but the system may also comprise fixed nodes, such as access points. Preferably all nodes have the capability of receiving and forwarding data.
The technology has been described in connection with what is presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that they are not to be limiting. On the contrary, various modifications and equivalent arrangements are included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
This application is a new U.S. application claiming priority to U.S. Provisional Appln. No. 60/786,710, filed 29 Mar. 2006, the entire content of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20100080114 | Ratnam et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100265904 | Yang et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2006121381 | Nov 2006 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070230605 A1 | Oct 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60786710 | Mar 2006 | US |