1. Field of the Invention
The present invention is related to key pads, and more particularly to key matrices that are scanned for decoding which key, if any, is depressed.
2. Background Information
Most keypad and key board interfaces, especially in cell phones and other mobile devices, are implemented with parallel wires that carry scan and sense signals. For example, 12 keys might be arranged with three scan lines and four sense lines to be able to decode which key is being depressed. Similarly, twenty keys might require four scan lines and five sense lines. Of course, other combinations of scan and sense lines may be used.
The point is that the typical micro-processor in cell phones requires a parallel connection to a keypad that traverses the hinge flex cable. The parallel connections carry the scan lines that are driven by the micro-processor and the parallel sense lines that return from the keypad. As the number of keys increases and devices become smaller, it would be advantageous to reduce the number of wires sent across the hinge flex cable of a flip or slider cell phone. The present invention provides a more efficient, more reliable use of wires in a flex cable (sometimes called flex circuit). More wires in the flex cable suggest a larger cable or smaller wires of a combination of both. Either approach reduces reliability.
The present invention provides for a reduced number of wires that traverse the hinge compared to the parallel wires of the prior art.
Illustratively, the present invention provides a virtual keypad (or keyboard) interface to a computer system. The computer system is arranged to scan a keypad directly, but the present invention provides a serializer/deserializer between the keypad and the computer system. The computer system scans the deserializer which acts as a virtual keypad, and the serializer scans the keypad as if the serializer was the computer system. The serializer drives the keypad scan signals and receives the keypad sense signals in the typical fashion. The serializer converts the results to a serial set of data that is sent over a cable, typically a flex cable. At the other end of the flex cable a deserializer receives the serial set of data and reconverts it back to the scan and sense line format of the keypad. The deserializer is connected, illustratively, to the scan and sense lines of the typical micro-processor that might be found in cell phones. In practice, the deserializer logically receives signals from the micro-processor on the scan lines from the microprocessor and return signals on the sense lines, and those signals mimic what the computer system would receive directly from the keypad.
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that although the following Detailed Description will proceed with reference being made to illustrative embodiments, the drawings, and methods of use, the present invention is not intended to be limited to these embodiments and methods of use. Rather, the present invention is of broad scope and is intended to be defined as only set forth in the accompanying claims.
The invention description below refers to the accompanying drawings, of which:
The keypad scan lines 12 are driven from the Master Serializer 16 and the four keypad sense lines 14 return to the Master Serializer 16. The Master Serializer provides a “any key depressed” detection circuit, an oscillator 20 and a serializer 22.
Still referring to
The Slave Deserializer 30 receives the clock (CLK) and serial data (DS) signals from the flex cable 24 and deserializes 32 and temporarily stores the scan/sense signals, to regenerate 34 logically the key pad matrix data.
The Slave Deserializer 30 receives scan signals on the lines 12′ from the microprocessor 40 and returns thereto sense lines 14′ that are duplicates of those associated with the key matrix 10. The operation is as if the Master Serializer and Slave Deserializer were not there.
The serial data DS is sent out by the serializer 22 over the flex cable 24 to the deserializer along with the clock CKS. The deserializer receives the DS signal and strobes the data into a register using the CKS signal. When all twelve bits have been loaded, the deserializer presents twelve data lines 19 to the keypad regenerator 34.
In this example with twelve keys, the micro-processor drives each of the three scan lines 12′ one at a time and monitors the four sense lines 14.′. The keypad regenerator directs one of those scan lines to one sense line. The specific scan line that results in a specific sense line signal being returned to the micro-processor is the identical scan/sense combination that would result if the keypad scan and sense lines were directly attached to the micro-processor keypad interface 21.
Still referencing
The alternative design of
As known in the art, the pass gates of
If, for example, Key5 is depressed, when SC(0) goes low, the sense lines, KEYSENSE[0], [1], [2] and [3], remain high, but when SC(1) goes low, KEYSCAN(1) goes low, and via Key5, KEYSENSE[1] goes low. This signal is input by the Master Serializer 16 electronics indicating that Key5 was depressed. The Master Serializer encodes and sends it bit by bit to the Slave Deserializer 34.
Serializers and deserializers are well known logic integrated circuits in the art and may be found from many manufacturers. However, a microprocessor or digital signal processors may be arrange to perform serialization and deserialization as would be known to those skilled in the art.
Those skilled in the art will understand that many other logic configurations may be used to sense which key is depressed, encode (or format), serialize, deserialize and regenerate for the micro-processor to read. The micro-processor will “believe” it is interrogating the keypad directly, but only two lines will traverse the flex cable.
In some applications, hardware debouncers may be advantageously employed. Cross coupled gates may be used where double throw switches are used, or timing delay circuits or combinations with flip flops may be employed as known by those skilled in the art.
As would be known to those skilled in the art, other timing arrangements as well as other multiplexing arrangements may be used to advantage with the present invention. For example, the present disclosure uses an oscillator to detect and decode a key depression, but logic signals may be used, including voltage signals and/or current signals. In addition, there are many microprocessors that may be used to advantage. Additionally, very large silicon integration circuits with dedicated functions may be used, as well as one chip computers.
Although the implementation is shown herein as electronic circuits, those skilled in the art will understand that other electronic circuits may perform the same functions, and that systems employing software, firmware and/or hardware and combinations thereof may be used to advantage to accomplish equivalent functions.
It should be understood that above-described embodiments are being presented herein as examples and that many variations and alternatives thereof are possible. Accordingly, the present invention should be viewed broadly as being defined only as set forth in the hereinafter appended claims.
The present application is related to and claims the benefit of the provisional patent application, Serial No. 60/915,803, filed on May 3, 2007, and which provisional application is of the same inventorship, title and ownership as the present application. The provisional application is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3746793 | Sachs et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
4042777 | Bequaert et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4365296 | Ulmer | Dec 1982 | A |
4939735 | Fredericks et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5402121 | Noorbehesht | Mar 1995 | A |
5555438 | Blech et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5892964 | Horan et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5898861 | Emerson et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6070204 | Poisner | May 2000 | A |
6538595 | Tucker et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6567512 | Hermanson et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6714143 | Ideura | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6784810 | Falik et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6927756 | Hauck | Aug 2005 | B1 |
7010640 | Hoshino et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
20010013859 | Roylance | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010032280 | Osakada et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020099980 | Olarig | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103987 | Jaffrey | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020174375 | Oh | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020174381 | Olarig et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030018892 | Tello | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030122691 | Olodort et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040090421 | Jamieson et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20050066000 | Liaw et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050097191 | Yamaki et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050151995 | Hauser et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050231399 | Fowler et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060217965 | Babu | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060258289 | Dua | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070042767 | Stepanian | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070061491 | Kerdemelidis et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070273560 | Hua et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080174566 | Zabala et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090106462 A1 | Apr 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60915803 | May 2007 | US |