The invention relates to a method for controlling the input signal for a contactless transponder.
The contactless transponder, as used for contactless chip cards or contactless tags, for example, frequently involves the use of “ASK modulation”. This is understood to be a radio-frequency signal which, with data present in digital form, alternates between a first and a second level and is thus modulated.
In the same way as the distinction is drawn for digital data between “yes” and “no” or “1” and “0” or “high” and “low”, a distinction is drawn between a high and a low amplitude. Two different types of modulation are currently in common use, namely ASK 100 and ASK 10. ASK 100 has a level difference of 100% and ASK 10 has a level difference of 10%.
One problem of ASK modulation can be seen in that a change in the distance between transmitter and receiver of the signal modulated in this manner also results in a change in the received amplitude at the receiver end while the amplitude of the transmitted signal remains the same. The same applies if the medium changes in the intermediate space between transmitter and receiver. To get around this problem, a “shunt controller” is used at the receiver end, as specified in EP 0398943 B1, and is used to control the input signal amplitude upstream of the demodulator.
A drawback of the arrangement described in this EP publication is that the presence of a signal pause, for example following a change from “high” to “low”, prompts such a controller to attempt to correct the level difference produced by the information which is to be transmitted. To get around this, the starting point already taken, at least within the company, is for identification of a signal change from “high” to “low” to be followed by a controller gain being frozen to a value before the signal change. As soon as another signal change back from “low” to “high” is identified, the freezing of the controller gain is lifted and the controller continues to operate without restriction.
This measure in turn has the drawback that, at the end of a “low”/“high” change, the controller gain is raised until the high amplitude has been reached. As soon as the high amplitude has been reached, the controller gain is lowered again. However, such a measure easily results in a control overshoot. Such an overshoot can in turn result in the demodulator identifying a state change, i.e. a signal change from “high” to “low”, which is in turn not actually present. Such identification of a signal change would ultimately result in incorrect data.
The invention is therefore based on an object of providing a method for controlling the input signal for contactless transponders in which there is a high degree of reliability in the input signal being controlled such that the signal can be detected with a high degree of reliability.
The fact that identification of the end of a modulation gap is followed by the control “frozen” in the modulation gap not being released until after a prescribed interval ensures that the control starts controlling using the reference variable of the high amplitude as “actual value”.
In the drawings:
In line with a circuit arrangement as shown in
As already explained with reference to
So that the demodulator circuit shown in
If the controller gain were to be released at the point S′, that is to say when the change from the low amplitude to the high amplitude is identified, this would at least result in a backswing in the curve profiles for Vsighigh and Vsiglow. As a result of the low amplitude value, the controller would increase the controller gain, so that the voltage across the connections LA and LB or on the node y would be increased. However, this would result in an excess as a result of the continuous rise in the input voltage on account of a necessary low control time constant. The controller would then reduce the gain, so that a backswing would result. This would in turn result in an intersection between the curve Vsighigh and the slowly rising curve for the signal Vref. Such an intersection would be identified at the demodulator output as a change from the high amplitude to the low amplitude, which is not actually taking place.
For this reason, the controller control system 3 locks the controller gain beyond the point S′ and does not release it until a later time. This time interval needs to be positioned far enough for it to be assumed that the input amplitude has risen sufficiently. However, the controller gain can be locked beyond the point S′ only until the controller has been released before a possible new change from the high-amplitude to the low amplitude.
This time interval is therefore dependent on the minimal period of the modulating signal. In one embodiment, the interval is shorter than a minimum distance between two modulation gaps.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102 38 592 | Aug 2002 | DE | national |
102 51 459 | Nov 2002 | DE | national |
This application is a continuation of International Patent application Ser. No. PCT/DE2003/002599, filed Aug. 1, 2003, which published in German on Oct. 17, 2002 as WO 02/082634, and is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5081653 | Saito | Jan 1992 | A |
5852535 | Richardson et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5864591 | Holcombe | Jan 1999 | A |
6031419 | Roberts et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
20020047732 | Akahori | Apr 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 398 943 | Dec 1995 | EP |
64-47134 | Mar 1989 | JP |
2003-125012 | Apr 2003 | JP |
WO-0028708 | May 2000 | WO |
WO-0171997 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO-02082634 | Oct 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050185704 A1 | Aug 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/DE03/02599 | Aug 2003 | US |
Child | 11064525 | US |