The present invention relates to a method and a circuit for testing a high-frequency sound reproducing loudspeaker being part of a loudspeaker system.
The output stages of loudspeaker systems, which are installed for instance on board motor vehicles, usually feature either a low frequency sound reproducing loudspeaker and a medium-frequency sound reproducing loudspeaker or a single medium-low sound frequency reproducing loudspeaker, which are generally directly connected to the amplifiers of such output stages.
An additional loudspeaker is usually provided, for reproducing high audio frequencies (also referred to hereinafter as “tweeter”), which is connected to the amplifiers of such output stages via a capacitor, as well as to the other loudspeakers.
Particularly, the operation of such loudspeaker systems is checked when they are installed in the vehicle.
Prior art diagnostic methods and circuits are known to be able to only ascertain the connect/disconnect state of the low and/or mid-frequency sound reproducing loudspeaker, because such loudspeaker is directly connected to the outputs of the output stage amplifiers.
A tweeter connected to the output stages via a capacitor cannot be tested using the methods and circuits developed for low and/or mid-frequency sound loudspeakers.
In view of obviating such drawbacks, it is known to use a circuit that implements a test during which an AC signal (typically an ultrasonic sine wave, e.g. at a frequency above 20 KHz) is transmitted to the tweeter and the current flowing in the tweeter is checked for its amplitude, to determine whether the tweeter is connected.
In recent times, Class D switching amplifiers are being increasingly used, also in the automotive field, and provide a much greater efficiency than Class AB amplifiers.
With reference to
The bridge-type switching amplifier 1 is schematically composed of a left arm 2 and a right arm 3, each being coupled to a terminal of the loudspeaker system 1A via pass-band filters 5 and 6.
The left arm 2 has a first input 2A, a second input 2A′ and an output 2C, the latter being in feedback relationship with the second input via a feedback line 2B, and the right arm 3 also has a first input 3A, a second input 3A′ and an output 3C, the latter being in feedback relationship with said second input 3A′ via a feedback line 3B.
As shown in
The loudspeaker system 1A is embodied by a load 4, as shown in
As is shown, the tweeter 4B is coupled to the woofer 4A via a filter 4C which can filter the high frequencies of the signal delivered by the amplifier 1.
Each of the low-pass filters 5 and 6 includes an inductor L1, L2 in series with a capacitor C1, C2.
Particularly, the inductor L1 is connected on one side to the output 2C of the left arm 2 of the amplifier, which output also acts as a virtual ground, and on the other side to the capacitor C1 and to a terminal 4D of the load 4; the capacitor C1 in turn having a terminal connected to the ground.
The same applies to the low-pass filter 6, in which the inductor L2 is connected on one side to the output 3C of the right arm 3 of the amplifier, which output also acts as a virtual ground, and on the other side to the capacitor C2 and to a terminal 4E of the load 4; the capacitor C2 in turn having a terminal connected to the ground.
During operation of the amplifier 1, the voltage at the output terminals 2C and 3C is a modulated square wave which is low-pass filtered by the filters 5 and 6 before being transmitted to the load 4, so that the audio component to be reproduced by the load can be extracted from the square wave signal.
If low-pass filtering were not provided, there might be electromagnetic compatibility problems (electromagnetic interference, EMI) and an unnecessary high power would be dissipated, thereby causing damages to the load.
In order to determine whether the tweeter 4D is actually connected to the terminals 4D and 4E, also with reference to
In this configuration, the test for determining whether the tweeter 4D of the loudspeaker system 1A is actually connected to the terminals 4D and 4E, according to a specific method, is performed by applying a test voltage VinAC varying in frequency, e.g. at a frequency above 20 KHz, to each input terminal 2A and 3A of the arms 2 and 3 of the amplifier.
Particularly, a voltage +VinAC may be applied to the input 2A, which voltage is replicated (at least ideally) by the feedback 2B, to the terminal 4D of the load 4, and a voltage −VinAC may be applied to the input 3A, i.e. a voltage opposite in phase to the voltage applied to the input 2A, which is replicated (at least ideally) by the feedback 3B to the terminal 4E of the load 4.
Nevertheless, the presence of the low-pass filters 5 and 6 causes problems in reading the proper current in the load 4: the low-pass filters 5 and 6 at the frequencies of the variable test signal ±VinAC, of about 20 KHz, do not correspond to an infinite load, but a current Ioutamp flows in such load 4, and adds to the load current Iload.
Thus, the current detection device 7 detects both the Iload current flowing into the load 4 and the current circulating in the capacitor C2 (or the capacitor C1 if the detection device 7 is coupled to the left arm 2 of the amplifier 1).
This may affect accuracy or make the method as described above for detecting the load 4 totally ineffective.
Also, with further reference to
In both simulations, L1 and L2 are assumed to be 20 μH and C1, C2 are assumed to be 2 μF and Vout=4Vpeak (i.e. the potential difference between the points 4D and 4E when a sinusoidal peak voltage of +2V/−2V is applied to the input terminals 2A and 3A respectively).
Particularly, it can be noted that both the load current Iload and the current Ioutamp flowing through the low-pass filter 6 into the left arm 3 flow into the load 4, because the frequencies at which the variable test signal −Vin is applied do not correspond to an infinite load.
It should be noted that, for clarity, the simulations of
Still with reference to such
if the load 4 is simulated by a 10 KΩ resistance (see
if the load 4 is simulated by a 4Ω resistance (see
Apparently, no accurate detection is possible if the load 4 is simulated by a 10 KΩ resistance (see
In other words, the device 7 reads a current value that cannot be used to determine whether the load 4 is actually disconnected.
Therefore, a need is strongly felt of checking the connect/disconnect state of a tweeter, to facilitate maintenance and/or testing.
In other words, a need is felt of checking for a disconnected terminal of a loudspeaker connected to the outputs via a capacitor.
One embodiment obviates the above mentioned problems of prior art testing methods and circuits.
One embodiment is a method for testing a tweeter being part of a loudspeaker system as defined by the features of claim 1.
One embodiment is a circuit for testing a tweeter being part of a loudspeaker system as defined by the features of claim 7.
Thanks to the present invention, a testing method and a testing circuit can be provided for more accurately determining whether a tweeter being part of a loudspeaker system is connected to the output stage of an amplifier.
The features and advantages of the invention will appear from the following detailed description of one practical embodiment, which is illustrated without limitation in the annexed drawings, in which:
Referring now to
a first electronic circuit 8 for generating a voltage signal VinAC to be applied to a first terminal, such as the terminal 4D, of the load 4;
a second electronic circuit 9 for generating a constant voltage signal VinDC to be applied to a second terminal, such as the terminal 4E, of the load 4;
the current detection device 7 connected to the left arm 2 of said amplifier 1, depending on where said second electronic means 9 are connected.
Particularly, as namely shown in
the first electronic circuit 8 for generating a voltage signal VinAC includes a voltage generator 8A that can preferably generate a sinusoidal voltage signal having a frequency above 20 KHz, which is coupled to the input terminal 2A of the left arm 2,
the second electronic circuit 9 for generating a voltage signal VinDC includes a voltage generator 9A that can preferably generate a constant voltage signal which is coupled, for example, to the input terminal 3A of the right arm 3 of the bridge-type switching amplifier.
In this configuration, the current detection device 7 is connected to the right arm 3 of the bridge-type switching amplifier 1. Particularly, this current detection device 7 is connected to the output terminal 3C of the right arm 3, i.e. in the virtual ground point.
In an advantageous configuration, the voltage generator 9A is preferably embodied by a grounding element, so that the input terminal 3A of the right arm 3 of the amplifier 1 is at a constant zero value.
Advantageously, the test voltage signal to be applied to the input terminals 2A, 3A of the bridge-type switching amplifier and hence to the terminals 4D, 4E of the load 4, is only present on one the input terminals, and hence on one of the outputs 2C, 3C.
In other words, the bridge-type switching amplifier 1 is controlled in a differential manner, i.e. voltage is applied to one input terminal, whereas the other terminal is grounded.
Particularly, the voltage VinAC is applied to the terminal 2A, whereas the input terminal 3A is grounded, which means that VinAC is present at the terminal 4D and the terminal 4E is grounded.
It shall be noted that the circuit configuration as shown in
Referring now to the simulations of the circuit of
if the load 4 is simulated by an impedance having a resistive value of 10 KΩ (see
if the load 4 is simulated by an impedance having a resistive value of 4Ω (see
As shown by
In other words, once the current reading device 7 has completed its measurement process, it is possible to determine with a certain degree of certainty whether the load 4 is actually disconnected because Ioutamp<40 mA, but it is not possible to determine with the same degree of certainty whether the load 4 is connected, because the value of the current Ioutamp is comparable to the value of the current that flows into the load Iload.
In certain cases, this can be a problem.
This occurs because, considering the specific circuit configuration as shown in
Furthermore, such inaccuracy may be caused by a possible attenuation (overshoot) induced by the resonance frequency of the inductor L2 of the low-pass filter 6, which resonance frequency can cause the signal at the ends of the load 6 to be different from the signal that is set by the voltage generators 8A and 9A.
To obviate this problem, further referring to
the left arm 2 includes a feedback line 2B′ which is directly coupled to the terminal 4D of the load 4,
the right arm 3 includes a feedback line 3B′ which is directly coupled to the terminal 4E of the load 4.
The advantage provided by the circuit configuration of
The voltage VinAC applied to the input terminal 2A is transmitted nearly unchanged to the terminal 4D of the load 4, whereas the voltage VinDC applied to the input terminal 3A is transmitted nearly unchanged to the terminal 4E of the load 4.
If a zero volt voltage VinDC is selected as an appropriate value, i.e. the input value 3A is grounded, the terminal 4E is also grounded because, thanks to the feedback line 3B, the terminal 4E acts as a virtual ground node.
In other words, the load 4 has the high-frequency voltage signal (frequency above 20 KHz) at the terminal 4D and grounding at the other terminal 4E, i.e. a potential difference corresponding to the voltage VinAC applied to the input terminal 2A is provided in the load.
Referring now to the simulations of the circuit of
if the load 4 is simulated by a 10 KΩ resistance (see
if the load 4 is simulated by a 4Ω resistance (see
In other words, the currents Ioutamp and Iload coincide in either case, i.e. either when the load 4 is simulated by an impedance having a 10 kΩ resistance (see
Thus, the device 7 that reads the current flowing into the load 4 after measuring the amplitude of the current flowing into such load 4 determines whether the load is connected to the amplifier.
In other words, by applying a high-frequency voltage signal to the terminal 4D of said load 4 and a constant voltage signal to the other terminal 4E of said load 4, it is possible to measure the current Iload that flows through said load 4 and determine a connect/disconnect state of said load 4 from the value of said current Iload.
The various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments. These and other changes can be made to the embodiments in light of the above-detailed description. In general, in the following claims, the terms used should not be construed to limit the claims to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification and the claims, but should be construed to include all possible embodiments along with the full scope of equivalents to which such claims are entitled. Accordingly, the claims are not limited by the disclosure.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
07425643.9 | Oct 2007 | EP | regional |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12249708 | Oct 2008 | US |
Child | 14036506 | US |