The invention relates generally to methods and computer-executable code for controlling the operation of an internal combustion engine for a motor vehicle that features deactivatable cylinders.
The prior art teaches equipping vehicles with “variable displacement,” “displacement on demand,” or “multiple displacement” internal combustion engines in which one or more cylinders may be selectively “deactivated,” for example, to improve vehicle fuel economy when operating under relatively low-load conditions. Typically, the cylinders are deactivated through use of deactivatable valve train components, such as the deactivating valve lifters as disclosed in U.S. patent publication no. US 2004/0244751 A1, whereby the intake and exhaust valves of each deactivated cylinder remain in their closed positions notwithstanding continued rotation of their driving cams. Combustion gases are thus trapped within each deactivated cylinder, whereupon the deactivated cylinders operate as “air springs” to reduce engine pumping losses.
When vehicle operating conditions are thereafter deemed to require an engine output torque greater than that achievable without the contribution of the deactivated cylinders, as through a heightened torque request from the vehicle operator based upon a detected intake manifold air pressure representing a current engine load, the deactivatable valve train components are returned to their nominal activated state to thereby “reactivate” the deactivated cylinders. More specifically, under one prior art approach, a torque request or torque demand signal, as determined, for example, from current accelerator pedal position and current engine speed, is compared to a mapped value for available engine torque at that engine speed. A value for a torque “reserve” representing an output torque “cushion” during a subsequent transition to a full-cylinder-activitation mode with no more than a negligible torque disturbance (generally imperceptible to the vehicle operator) is also calculated or provided. When the torque request exceeds the mapped threshold value less the reserve threshold, the engine control module initiates a “slow” transition out of the cylinder-deactivation engine operating mode. These “slow” transitions, intended to feature only those transition torque disturbances that are generally imperceptible to the vehicle operator, are to be distinguished from “fast” transitions that are typically triggered in response, for example, a torque request that well exceeds the available engine torque, under which conditions a noticeable torque disturbance is perhaps even desirable as feedback to the vehicle operator.
Unfortunately, such an approach to “slow” transitions from a cylinder-deactivation mode to a full-cylinder-activation mode is likely to initiate a transition in response, for example, to a minor torque request excursion above the mapped threshold value not otherwise requiring the greater torque potential of full-cylinder engine operation, thereby significantly reducing the fuel economy advantage that might otherwise be achieved through use of the cylinder-deactivation engine operating mode.
In accordance with an aspect of the invention, a method for controlling a “slow” reactivation of a given deactivated cylinder of a multi-displacement internal combustion engine includes determining, while operating the engine in a partial-displacement mode characterized by deactivation of the given cylinder, a torque request based at least in part on a driver demand signal, as may be conveniently determined and stored by an engine control module or powertrain controller when determining other engine operating parameters, such as target mass air flow and fuel flow rates. The method also includes estimating a maximum potential output torque for the engine in the cylinder-deactivation mode based at least in part on a first engine operating parameter, for example, by retrieving mapped values from a lookup table based on a current engine speed. The method further includes calculating a difference by which the torque request exceeds the maximum potential output torque; integrating the calculated differences over time to obtain a torque request error measure; and initiating a switch from the partial-displacement mode to a full-displacement mode (characterized by activation of the deactivatable cylinder) when the torque request error measure is not less than a first threshold value.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, when estimating the maximum potential output torque, the method preferably further includes offsetting the first value by a second value representing a torque offset correlated with a noise-vibration-harshness (NVH) threshold for a slow transition at a given engine speed, for example, by retrieving the second value from a second lookup table containing calibratable values for torque offset, mapped as a function of both engine speed and current vehicle speed (the latter similarly having an impact on the desired evaluation of the torque request, and the avoidance of more than a negligible torque disturbance during any slow transition).
In accordance with yet another aspect of the invention, the first threshold value, to which the torque request error measure is compared, is either a calibratable value; a calibratable value adapted, for example, based on such information as an indication of a vehicle operator driving style; or a value retrieved from a lookup table based, for example, on one of a determined indication of vehicle operator driving style and an operator-selectable indication of a desired vehicle fuel economy.
From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that brief, minor torque request excursions above the current maximum potential engine torque output, when operating the engine in a cylinder-deactivated mode, will not generally not trigger a reactivation of the deactivated cylinders, because a “slow” switch to a full-cylinder-activation mode based upon an increased torque request is initiated only when the integrated torque request “error” exceeds a predetermined threshold value.
Other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention will be readily appreciated upon a review of the subsequent description of the preferred embodiment and the appended claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying Drawings.
A method 10 for controlling a reactivation of a given deactivated cylinder of a multi-displacement internal combustion engine is generally illustrated in
As seen in
Returning to
At block 16 of
Referring to
As seen in
Significantly, under an aspect of the invention, the torque offset value Toffset can have either a positive or a negative sign, depending upon the level of NVH that may be permitted for a given vehicle/engine combination at the table's designated ranges of engine speed and vehicle speed. For example, because a vehicle operator is more likely to be sensitive to torque fluctuations and/or NVH increases at relatively low engine or vehicle speeds, the torque offset value Toffset is nominally greater at such relatively low engine or vehicle speeds; however, for example, because of the higher levels of ambient noise associated with relatively higher engine and vehicle speeds, the torque offset value Toffset vehicle generally becomes numerically less—or even has a negative sign—at such relatively higher engine and vehicle speeds. By way of further example only,
At block 28, the retrieved torque request Treq, maximum potential output torque value Tmax, and torque offset value Toffset are summed to thereby calculate a difference or “error,” which is then scalar-calibrated based on a selected loop time in multiplier block 30 using a calibrated time step. The resulting torque-time product is integrated at block 34, and positive values for the resulting torque request error measure are supplied to a switch 36 under the control of a suitable flag, ENABLE, for subsequent comparision to the predetermined threshold.
Referring again to
While the above description constitutes the preferred embodiment, it will be appreciated that the invention is susceptible to modification, variation and change without departing from the proper scope and fair meaning of the subjoined claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4585101 | Danno | Apr 1986 | A |
5374224 | Huffmaster et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5408974 | Lipinski et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5568795 | Robichaux et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5611754 | Haga et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
6311670 | Constancis | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6843752 | Bolander | Jan 2005 | B1 |
20040244744 | Falkowski et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040244761 | Falkowski et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |