This invention relates to methods and compositions for treating diseases that alter the surface active properties of the lung. An important feature in all mammalian lungs is the presence of surface active lining material in the alveoli. These surface active materials are lung surfactants comprised of protein-lipid compositions, e.g. surface active proteins and phospholipids, which are produced naturally in the lungs and are essential to the lungs' ability to absorb oxygen. They facilitate respiration by continually modifying surface tension of the fluid normally present within the air sacs, or alveoli, that line the inside of the lungs. In the absence of sufficient lung surfactant or when lung surfactant functionality is compromised, these air sacs tend to collapse, and, as a result, the lungs do not absorb sufficient oxygen.
Insufficient or dysfunctional surfactant in the lungs results in a variety of respiratory illnesses in both infants and adults. For example, insufficient lung surfactant may manifest itself as respiratory distress syndrome in premature infants (“iRDS”), i.e. those born prior to 32 weeks of gestation, who have not fully developed a sufficient amount of natural lung surfactant. Diseases involving dysfunctional lung surfactant include may adult respiratory disorders such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), asthma, pneumonia, acute lung injury (ALI), etc., as well as infant diseases such as meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS), wherein full-term babies have their first bowel movement in the womb and aspirate the meconium into their lungs. In these cases, the amount of lung surfactant may be normal, but surfactant properties have been disrupted by foreign matter, trauma, sepsis and other infection, etc.
Diseases involving surfactant deficiency and dysfunction have historically been treated by the administration of surface active materials to the lungs, sometimes referred to as surfactant (replacement) therapy. For example, surfactant therapy is at present an established part of routine clinical management of newborn infants with iRDS. Usually these surface active materials are naturally-occurring or synthetically engineered lung surfactants, but may also be nonphospholipid substances such as perfluorocarbons. As used herein, the terms “lung surfactant” and “surfactant” contemplate all of these service active materials suitable for use in surfactant therapy. These lung surfactants can be administered in a variety of ways, the simplest being direct instillation of a liquid solution of lung surfactant into the lungs. An initial dose of about 100 mg/kg body weight (BW) is usually needed to compensate for the deficiency of lung surfactant in these babies, and repeated treatment is required in many cases.
An alternative approach is treatment with aerosolized lung surfactant. Aerosol delivery of surfactant to the lungs is usually less efficient than direct instillation, mainly because of large losses of aerosol in the delivery system. In conventional delivery systems, the amount of aerosol reaching the lungs can be further reduced if particle sizes are too large, i.e. >5 μm mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD), if aerosol delivery is not coordinated with slow inspiration and breath-hold, or if airways (especially artificial airways) are long and narrow. Estimates of lung delivery of aerosolized surfactants with most conventional delivery systems have been generally less than 1–10% of amount the liquid surfactant placed in the nebulizer.
However, animal work with improved aerosol delivery systems has shown some promise of increased efficiency. The gas exchange and mechanical benefits that have been seen in animal lung models with the aerosol approach were comparable to those seen with the instillation technique, but those benefits were achieved with only a fraction of the conventional 100 mg/kg of body weight (BW) instilled dose (MacIntyre, N. R., “Aerosolized Medications for Altering Lung Surface Active Properties”. Respir Care 2000;45(3) 676–683). As an example of improved aerosol delivery methods in the prior art, increased deposition of aerosolized surfactant has been achieved in animal models using ultrasonic nebulizers instead of jet nebulizers. Lung surfactant deposition of only 0.15–1.6 mg/kg BW/hour has been reported using jet nebulization, whereas deposition of about 10 mg/kg BW/hour (7–9 mg/kg BW with 50 minute nebulization) has been achieved with ultrasonic nebulization. See, for example, Schermuly R et al; “Ultrasonic Nebulization for Efficient Delivery of Surfactant in a Model of Acute Lung Injury—Impact on Gas Exchange.” Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.; 1997 156 (2) 445–453.
It has been reported that respiratory support with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (“nCPAP”) systems, coupled with early instillation of lung surfactants, may have several advantages in the treatment of neonates with iRDS. This treatment has been found to be effective in decreasing the need for mechanical ventilation, with its accompanying mechanical and infectious risks and pathophysiological effects, but still requires intubation for surfactant treatment. See, for example, “Early Use of Surfactant, NCPAP Improves Outcomes in Infant Respiratory Distress Syndrome”; Pediatrics 2004; 11;e560–e563 (as reported online by Medscape Medical News group, Jun. 4, 2004).
Opportunities for aerosol delivery of lung surfactants to infants weighing less that 5 kg. have been limited, largely due to the low minute volumes required and the relatively high flow rates of nebulizers and ventilatory support devices that have been available. It has been demonstrated that pre-term infants, both on and off the ventilator, received less than 1% of the nebulizer dose to their lungs. See “Efficiency of aerosol medication delivery from a metered dose inhaler versus jet nebulizer in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia”. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 1996 May;21; (5):301–9. There has been little empirical data to suggest that nCPAP would be any more efficient since most animal and in vitro CPAP models have demonstrated less than 3% deposition.
Simultaneous administration of surfactant aerosol therapy (using a jet nebulizer) in conjunction with a CPAP system has been found to be clinically feasible and to result in improved respiratory parameters. See, for example, Jorch G et al; “To the Editor: Surfactant Aerosol Treatment of Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Spontaneously Breathing Premature Infants”; Pediatric Pulmonology 24:22–224 (1997); and Smedsaas-Lofvenberg A; “Nebulization of Drugs in a Nasal CPAP System”; Acta Paediatr 88: 89–92 (1999). However, the losses of aerosolized lung surfactant and other aerosolized medicaments used in CPAP systems were found to be unacceptably high, mainly because of the continued inefficiency of the delivery system. The authors suggest that as much as 10% of the nebulized surfactant might be expected to enter the pharyngeal tube coupled to the patient's respiratory system, but they did no testing to quantify that delivery estimate. (Jorch G et al, supra).
A number of studies have tried to combine aerosolized surfactant with high-frequency ventilation of the infant with iRDS, and aerosolized surfactants have also been tried in the treatment of airway diseases, e.g. cystic fibrosis and chronic bronchitis, both with mixed success, again because of the inefficiency of the delivery systems used. (McIntyre, supra).
As can be seen by the foregoing discussion, many important respiratory therapies for the treatment of lung surfactant deficiency or dysfunction have not been cost-effective or practical to pursue due to the inefficiencies of existing aerosol delivery technology. The present invention is directed to a method of treating these diseases through improved aerosol generation and delivery.
The present invention provides an improved method of treating a disease involving surfactant deficiency or dysfunction in a patient's lungs. In one embodiment, the method of the present invention comprises the steps of providing a liquid lung surfactant composition; aerosolizing the lung surfactant composition with a vibrating aperture-type aerosol generator to form a lung surfactant aerosol; and introducing the lung surfactant aerosol into the gas flow within a circuit of a pressure-assisted breathing system, preferably a CPAP system, coupled to the patient's respiratory system, whereby a therapeutically effective amount of the lung surfactant is delivered to the patient's lungs. Preferred lung surfactants comprise natural surfactants derived from the lavage of animal lungs and synthetically engineered lung surfactants.
In one embodiment, the vibrating aperture-type aerosol generator of the present invention allows the use of a liquid surfactant composition, e.g. a lung surfactant composition having a concentration from 20 mg/ml to 120 mg/ml. The diluent may be any pharmaceutically acceptable diluent, e.g. water or a saline solution.
In another embodiment, 10–90%, preferably greater than 30%, of the active lung surfactant provided to the aerosol generator is delivered to the patient's airway and is inhaled by the patient . Preferably, 5–50% of the active lung surfactant is actually deposited in the patient's lungs. In the practice of the present invention, a therapeutically effective amount of lung surfactant delivered to the patient's lungs (a “unit dose”) may be in the range of 2–400 mg. Flow rates of vibrating aperture-type aerosol generators of the present invention may be in the range of 0.1–0.5 ml/min, which is considerably higher than the flow rate of comparable aerosol generators. Preferred delivery rates of active surfactant to the patient's airway are in the range of 2–800 mg/hr. Preferably, the aerosol generator may be adjusted to produce a surfactant particle size of less than 5 μm MMAD, most preferably 1–3 μm MMAD.
The pressure-assisted breathing system utilized in the present invention, preferably a CPAP system, may be designed to further improve the efficiency of the delivery of aerosolized medicaments, including aerosolized surfactants. In one embodiment, the aerosol generator may be positioned so as to introduce aerosolized lung surfactant into the relatively low-volume flow in the respiratory circuit between the main flow of a CPAP system and the patient airway, thereby eliminating the dilution effect that can occur when the aerosol is introduced into the relatively high-volume flow in the pressure-generating circuit.
In another embodiment, the aerosol generator may be positioned so as to introduce surfactant aerosol into a plenum chamber located outside the direct breathing circuit of the CPAP system, thereby collecting a concentration of surfactant aerosol higher than generated by the aerosol generator alone, prior to discharging the surfactant aerosol into the respiratory circuit.
In another embodiment, the circuit of the pressure-assisted breathing system into which the aerosolized lung surfactant is introduced may be provided with a gently angled, preferably straight, path for the flow of aerosol particles from the point at which the aerosol generator introduces the aerosolized lung surfactant into the gas flow to the point at which the aerosolized lung surfactant enters the patient's respiratory system. This design minimizes the amount of aerosol particles that may be trapped at corners in the inner walls of the tubes, deposited at irregular surfaces and obstructions in the tubes or other elements of the circuit, or diverted by sharply angled conduits in the circuit, e.g. those present in conventional “Y”, “T” or “V”-shaped junction devices used for connecting the various circuits.
In yet another embodiment, the aerosol generator may be coupled with means for discontinuing the introduction of aerosolized surfactant into the circuit to reduce the amount of aerosolized surfactant lost to the atmosphere during the expiration phase of the respiration cycle.
a and 7b are diagrammatic representations of models used for measuring aerosol delivery with simulated infant breathing pattern during nCPAP.
In one embodiment, the present invention is directed to a method of treating diseases involving surfactant deficiency (also known as “surfactant depletion syndromes”) or diseases involving surfactant dysfunction (also known as “surfactant dysfunction syndromes”). Such diseases include, but are not limited to, infant respiratory distress syndrome (iRDS), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ADRS), meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS), asthma, pneumonia (all kinds, including ventilator associated pneumonia), persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN), congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), sepsis, acute lung injury (ALI), bronchiolitis, COPD-chronic bronchitis, cystic fibrosis, lung transplantation diseases and respiratory syncitial virus (RSV). Since methods for treating such diseases generally involve the administration to the patient's lung of a naturally-occurring (animal-derived) or synthetic (engineered) lung surfactant, the subject methods are sometimes referred to in the art as “surfactant (replacement) therapies”.
Generally, the method of the present invention comprises the steps of providing a liquid lung surfactant composition; aerosolizing the lung surfactant composition with an aerosol generator, preferably a vibrating aperture-type aerosol generator, to form an aerosolized lung surfactant (also referred to herein as “surfactant aerosol”); and introducing the surfactant aerosol into the gas flow within a circuit of a pressure-assisted breathing system, preferably a CPAP system, coupled to the patient's respiratory system, whereby a therapeutically effective amount of surfactant is delivered to the patient's lungs.
Lung surfactants are complex and highly surface-active materials, generally composed of lipids and/or proteins. Their principal property is to reduce the surface tension in the lungs and protect the lungs from injuries and infections caused by inhaled particles and microorganisms. The composition of naturally-occurring lung surfactant may vary with various factors such as species, age, and general health of the subject. Therefore, the definition of what a natural lung surfactant is or what should be included in a synthetic lung surfactant composition is dependent on the situation. Surfactant isolated from lung lavage of healthy mammals contain about 10% protein and 90% lipids, of which about 80% are phospholipids and about 20% are neutral lipids, including about 10% unesterified cholesterol.
Lung surfactants are typically high in viscosity and difficult to administer. The lung surfactant may be admixed with a pharmaceutically acceptable diluent, e.g. water or a saline solution, to provide a liquid surfactant composition. In the practice of the present invention, liquid lung surfactant compositions are preferred, for example, liquid surfactant compositions having a concentration of from 20–120 mg/ml, preferably 20–80 mg/ml. Commercially available lung surfactants may already be presented as ready-mixed liquids, and are contemplated as also being useful in the present invention. Examples of commercially available lung surfactant compositions are natural surfactant compositions marketed under the trademarks CUROSURF (Chiesi Pharmaceuticals), ALVEOFACT (Boehringer Ingelheim) and SURVANTA (Abbott Laboratories); and synthetic surfactant compositions marketed under the trademarks EXOSURF (Glaxo Wellcome) and SURFAXIN (Discovery Laboratories).
Aerosol generators permit aerosol formation in a wide variety of ways, e.g. single-substance jet, atomization by centrifugal force, condensation, vaporization, dispersion, ultrasound, jet nebulization, etc. Vibrating aperture-type aerosol generators are preferred in the practice of the present invention. Vibrating aperture-type aerosol generators comprise a unique dome-shaped aperture plate containing over 1000 precision-formed tapered holes, surrounded by a vibrational element. When energy is applied, the aperture plate vibrates over 100,000 times per second. This rapid vibration causes each aperture to act as a micropump, drawing liquid in contact with the plate through the holes to form consistently sized droplets. The result is a low-velocity liquid aerosol optimized for maximum lung deposition. Preferred vibrating aperture-type aerosol generators aerosolize liquids very efficiently, leaving virtually no residual liquid, and operate without using propellants or generating heat, thereby preserving a surfactant's molecular integrity. Representative vibrating aperture-type aerosol generators are described in detail in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,164,740; 5,586,550; 5,758,637; and 6,085,740, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. Apertures in the aperture plate may be shaped to enhance the rate of droplet production while maintaining droplets within a specified size range, e.g. as described in co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/822,573, filed Mar. 30, 2001, incorporated by reference herein. Such apertures may be particularly useful for aerosolizing viscous surfactant compositions in accordance with the present invention. Preferred vibrating aperture-type aerosol generators are commercially available from Aerogen, Inc., Mountain View, Calif.
In general, a nebulizer containing the aerosol generator is positioned so as to introduce the surfactant aerosol produced by the aerosol generator directly into the gas flow within a circuit of a pressure-assisted breathing system coupled to the subject patient's respiratory system. As used herein, the term “pressure-assisted breathing system” means any artificial ventilation system that applies continuous or intermittent pressure, usually positive (i.e. above a certain baseline such as atmospheric pressure), to gas(es) in or about a patient's airway as a means of augmenting movement of gases into the lungs. Any pressure-assisted breathing system is contemplated as being useful in the present invention, e.g. standard CPAP, nCPAP and Bi-level CPAP systems as well as mechanical ventilators that perform the breathing function for the patient and/or provide CPAP to assist in spontaneous breathing by the patient.
CPAP systems support spontaneous breathing by the patient and typically comprise a pressure-generating circuit for maintaining a positive pressure within the system, a patient interface device coupled to a patient's respiratory system and a respiratory circuit for providing gas communication between the pressure-generating circuit and the patient interface device. CPAP systems utilize a constant positive pressure during inhalation to increase and maintain lung volumes and to decrease the work by a patient during spontaneous breathing. The positive pressure effectively dilates the airway and prevents its collapse. The delivery of positive airway pressure is accomplished through the use of a positive air flow source (“flow generator”) that provides oxygen or a gas containing oxygen through a flexible tube connected to a patient interface device such as nasal prongs (cannula), nasopharyngeal tubes or prongs, an endotracheal tube, mask, etc. CPAP systems typically maintain and control continuous positive airway pressure by using a restrictive air outlet device, e.g. a fixed orifice or threshold resistor, or a pressure valve, which modulates the amount of gas leaving the circuit to which the patient interface device is attached. This pressure regulating device may be placed at, before or beyond the patient interface device and defines a primary pressure-generating circuit. Reference is made to the aforementioned co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 10/828,765, filed Apr. 20, 2004; U.S. application Ser. No. 10/883,115, filed Jun. 30, 2004; and U.S. application Ser. No. 10/957,321, filed Sep. 9, 2004 for a more detailed description of CPAP systems suited for use with aerosolized medicaments generally, and particularly suited for the practice of the present invention. Use of such CPAP systems in combination with a vibrating aperture-type aerosol generator considerably enhances the efficiency of delivery of the surfactant aerosol to the patient's lungs.
Flow generator 11 may conveniently comprise any of the known sources of pressurized gas suitable for use with pressure-assisted breathing systems. Typically, the flow generator is capable of supplying a flow of high-volume gas, which includes at least some portion of oxygen, at slightly greater than atmospheric pressure. For example, the source of pressurized gas may be an air blower or a ventilator, or the pressurized gas may originate from a wall supply of air and/or oxygen, such as that found within hospitals and medical facilities, or may originate from a pressurized cylinder or cylinders. The pressurized gas may comprise various known mixtures of oxygen with air, nitrogen, or other gases and may be provided in a single stream or flow to circuit P.
Pressure-regulating device 14 may comprise any of the known devices for controlling and maintaining air pressure within a CPAP system at the desired level. Typically, pressure-regulating device 14 may comprise a restrictive air outlet device such as a pressure valve or threshold resistor that modulates the flow of gas leaving the pressure-regulating circuit P. This resistance to air flow may be varied so that the continuous positive airway pressure conducted by respiratory circuit R to patient interface device 19 will suit the needs of the particular patient using the apparatus. Although pressure-regulating device 14 is typically placed downstream of junction unit 13, it may also be placed at or upstream to junction 13.
Junction unit 13 is the point at which respiratory circuit R is in gas communication with primary pressure-generating circuit P. In the CPAP system shown in
Patient interface device 19 is coupled to nebulizer 18, either directly or through a short section of flexible tube of the same size and material as tubing 16. Patient interface device may include any of the known devices for providing gas communication between the CPAP device and the patient's respiratory system. By way of example, the patient interface device may include nasal prongs (as shown), an oral/nasal mask, a nasal mask, nasopharyngeal prongs, an endotracheal tube, a tracheotomy tube, a nasopharyngeal tube, and the like.
Nebulizer apparatus 18 is disposed in respiratory circuit R between primary pressure-generating circuit P and patient interface device 19 so as to emit an aerosolized surfactant into the flow of gas in respiratory circuit R that is inhaled by the patient. Vibrating aperture-type nebulizer apparatus are preferred for the practice of this invention. In one embodiment of the present invention, the nebulizer comprises a “miniature” nebulizer 18 such as illustrated in
Nebulizer 18 may comprise a reservoir 31 within body 21 for holding a liquid surfactant composition to be delivered to patient's respiratory system and a vibrating aperture-type aerosol generator 32 for aerosolizing the liquid surfactant. Upper medicament port 22 may be provided for delivering the liquid surfactant into reservoir 31 and a removable plug (not shown) may be provided to seal medicament port 22. Reservoir 31 may be sized to accommodate a small volume of surfactant composition, e.g. a volume of 4 ml or less, and preferably a volume of 1–3 ml. Aerosol generator 32 may be positioned at lower medicament outlet 34 of reservoir 31 so that the liquid surfactant composition flows by gravitational action from the reservoir 31 to aerosol generator 32 (Flow G).
Aerosol generator 32 may comprise a piezoelectric element and a vibratable member having a plurality of tapered apertures extending between a first surface and a second surface thereof. Representative vibratable aperture-type aerosol generators are described in detail in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,164,740; 5,586,550; 5,758,637; and 6,085,740, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference. In general, the first surface of the vibratable member, which faces upwardly, receives the liquid medicament from reservoir 31, and the aerosolized medicament is generated at the second surface of the vibratable member when droplets of medicament are ejected from the apertures upon vibration of the vibratable member. Aerosol generators of the present invention are preferably small and light-weight, for example, about 1 gm.
Aerosol generator 32 is positioned so as to facilitate flow of liquid surfactant composition from the reservoir 31 to the aerosol generator 32 and to facilitate passage of the aerosolized surfactant from the aerosol generator 32 into arm 23. Arm 23 may comprise a supply conduit 35 in fluid communication with aerosol generator 32 at one end and connector unit 24 at the other end so as to conduct a flow of aerosolized surfactant (Flow A) toward connector 24. Connector 24 may comprise a gas conduit 36, which is defined on one end by inlet conduit 37 in inlet nipple 25 and at the other end by outlet conduit 38 in outlet nipple 26. The gas conduit 36 of connector 24 may be quite small, e.g. less than 10 cc in volume for infant applications, thereby decreasing dead space in the respiratory circuit. The placement of aerosol generator 32 between reservoir 31 and the respiratory circuit allows reservoir 31 to be opened at medicament port 22 to add liquid surfactant composition without interrupting the pressure of gas flow B in flexible tubing 16. Other nebulizer designs may create a major leak in the pressure circuit when the reservoir is open to the atmosphere.
The downstream end of flexible tubing 16 (see
Nebulizer apparatus 18 may be connected to a controller (not shown) for controlling operation of and to supply power to the aerosol generator. Preferably, the controller and other electronic components are connected with wires, cables and connectors that are small and flexible. Examples of other components that may also be associated with nebulizer apparatus 18 are a timer, status indication means, liquid medicament supply nebule or syringe, etc., all as known by those skilled in the art and described in detail in the aforementioned patent and patent applications.
Vibrating aperture-type aerosol generators have several aerosol delivery characteristics that make them uniquely suited for aerosolized medicaments in general, and in particular, for surfactant replacement therapy in accordance with the present invention. Vibrating aperture-type aerosol generators are extremely efficient at producing aerosol particles, aerosolizing nearly 100% of the liquid surfactant that comes into direct contact with the aperture plate. This characteristic virtually eliminates one source of surfactant loss in the system.
In addition, vibrating aperture-type aerosol generators deliver a low-velocity aerosol of precisely defined average particle size. Aerosol particle size distribution and drug output can be modified by changing aperture size in the vibrating plate to meet the needs of a particular patient or situation. Preferably, aerosol particle size is adjusted to less than 5 μm mass median aerodynamic diameter (WAD), and most preferably 1–3 μm MMAD, so as to maintain optimum efficiency. These smaller aerosol particles contribute to enhanced delivery and peripheral pulmonary deposition of the surfactant aerosol, thereby reducing aerosol loss in the system. Vibrating aperture-type aerosol generators also do not create significant heat or shear that can change the characteristics and properties of the surfactant composition.
Aerosol output (flow rate) for vibrating aperture-type aerosol generators of the present invention is considerably higher than other types of nebulizers, and as a result, treatment times for the method of the present invention are considerably shorter than conventional surfactant therapies. For example, a therapeutic amount (“unit dose”) of aerosolized surfactant deposited in a patient's lung may be in the range of 2–400 mg. In the practice of the invention, liquid surfactant composition may comprise a solution having a concentration of 20–120 mg/ml. Flow rates for vibrating aperture-type aerosol generators of the present invention are in the range of 0.1–0.5 ml/min, which is considerably higher than the flow rate of comparable aerosol generators, e.g. jet nebulizers typically have a flow rate of less than 0.2 ml/min. If a unit dose of aerosolized surfactant for treatment of surfactant deficiency in a 1 kg neonate is 40 mg (e.g. 1.0 ml of a 40 mg/ml liquid surfactant composition), the method of the present invention using a vibrating aperture-type aerosol generator with a flow rate of 0.4 ml/min will generate 90% of the unit dose in less than 3 minutes, whereas a comparable jet nebulizer would require a fill volume of 3 ml and may deliver the same unit dose in more than 6 minutes. The lower dose requirement and shorter treatment times achieved by the method of the present invention considerably improves the likelihood that the patient will receive benefit prior to direct instillation, or require a treatment protocol with a much lower amount of liquid surfactant placed in the nebulizer. In preferred embodiments, the delivery rate of active surfactant delivered to the lungs of the patient is preferably in the range of 2–800 mg/hr.
In preferred embodiments, the small diameter and size of the reservoir holding the liquid surfactant composition in the nebulizer having a vibrating aperture-type aerosol generator allows the nebulizer to be placed directly into the respiratory circuit without adding a large “rebreathed volume”. For example, preferred vibrating aperture-type aerosol generators of the present invention may not add more than about 5 ml of rebreathed volume. As used herein, “rebreathed volume” is the volume of gas required in the system to produce the desired amount of aerosolized surfactant in a confined space. Pneumatic and jet nebulizers typically have reservoir volumes of 6–20 ml, so that placement of one of these nebulizers in the respiratory circuit of a CPAP system between the main flow and the patient's airway adds an undesirable increase in rebreathed volume in the circuit. This increase in rebreathed volume has a dilutive effect on the aerosolized surfactant and reduces the efficiency of the delivery system.
In addition to the previously discussed improved aerosol output and efficiency contributed by the vibrating aperture-type aerosol generator of the invention, the efficiency of the present invention may further be improved by designing the pressure-assisted breathing system in ways that substantially reduce the amount of any aerosolized medicament lost in the system. As one example, the aerosol generator may be positioned so as to introduce the surfactant aerosol into the respiratory circuit of the CPAP system (as shown in
In one preferred embodiment that may be used for any aerosolized medicament, and is particularly useful in surfactant therapy, surfactant aerosol from a vibrating aperture-type aerosol generator may be generated into a plenum chamber of 5–400 ml internal volume located outside the direct breathing circuit (e.g. respiratory circuit R in
As one example of apparatus using a plenum chamber according to the present invention,
In another embodiment, the efficiency of delivery of aerosolized surfactant according to the present invention may be significantly increased in certain pressure-assisted breathing systems by eliminating the sharp angles or corners encountered by the flow of aerosol particles in the circuits of the pressure-assisted breathing system, described in detail in co-pending application U.S. Ser. No. 10/883,115, filed Jun. 30, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference. The efficiency of the delivery of aerosolized surfactant to the patient's lungs may be enhanced by providing a straight or gently angled path for the flow of surfactant aerosol particles from the point at which the aerosol generator introduces the surfactant aerosol particles into the gas flow to the point at which the surfactant aerosol particles enter the patient's respiratory system. This design minimizes the amount of surfactant aerosol particles that may be trapped at corners in the inner walls of the tubes, deposited at irregular surfaces and obstructions in the tubes or other elements of the circuit, or be diverted by sharply angled paths in the circuit.
As one example of the aforementioned design,
In another embodiment, nasal cannula 19 of
As still another example of how the efficiency of delivery of aerosolized surfactant according to the present invention may be increased, the aerosol generator (e.g. contained within nebulizer 18 of
During the operation of CPAP system 10, a high volume flow of gas 60 is introduced into circuit P from flow generator 14 and passes through conduit 15 to pressure-regulating device 11 which maintains a continuous positive pressure throughout the system. Inspiratory flow 61, which may typically be about 10% of flow 60, flows from conduit 15 of pressure-generating circuit P into tube 16 of respiratory circuit R to provide a relatively constant inspiratory flow rate of air to the patient's respiratory system, thereby assisting in the patient's inspiratory efforts in accordance with conventional CPAP system principles. At junction 50, a portion 61a of inspiratory flow 61 proceeds through tube 16 to nasal cannula 19, and a portion 61b of inspiratory flow 61 is diverted through tube 51 to flow sensor 54.
Flow 61a passes through junction 68, at which point aerosolized surfactant particles 62 produced by the aerosol generator of nebulizer 18 are introduced into flow 61a. Resulting flow 63 containing entrained surfactant aerosol particles 62 ultimately passes into the patient's respiratory system through nasal cannula 19, thereby delivering the aerosolized surfactant to the patient's respiratory system. Flow 61b passes through tube 51 and adjustable orifice valve 52, which may be adjusted to reduce the rate of flow 61b to a reduced flow 61c, e.g. a flow rate that may be about 20% of the flow rate of flow 61b. Reduced flow 61c then proceeds through disposable filter 53 to flow sensor 54, and is ultimately released to the atmosphere. As flow 61c passes through flow sensor 54, flow sensor 54 measures the volumetric flow rate of flow 61c and generates a first electronic signal, e.g. a certain output voltage, in electronic circuitry 55 of CPAP system 10 that is characteristic of flow 61c. Since flow 21c is directly proportional to inspiratory flow 21, the first electronic signal caused by flow 61c may be used by the system to identify when the patient is inhaling and continue the delivery of aerosolized surfactant.
When the patient exhales, expiratory flow 64 passes through nasal cannula 19 to tube 16 and is diverted through tube 51 at junction unit 50. Expiratory flow 64 is combined with inspiratory flow 61b in tube 51 to produce a flow rate equal to the sum of the flow rates of flow 64 and 61b. The combination of flow 64 and flow 61b passes through adjustable orifice valve 52 and the total flow rate is reduced in the same manner as previously described for flow 61b alone (identified in
When expiratory effort by the patient stops and inhalation commences again, expiratory flow 64 discontinues and only inspiratory flow 61 is present in the system. As a result, only flow 61c passes through tube 51. Flow sensor 54 detects this change (decrease) in flow rate and generates the first electronic signal, which is transmitted to nebulizer 18. The first electronic signal causes nebulizer 18 to turn on the aerosol generator and resume the introduction of surfactant aerosol particles 62 into flow 61a. The turning on and off of the aerosol generator of nebulizer 18 in concert with the patient's respiratory cycle allows aerosolized surfactant to be introduced into the CPAP system of the present invention only when the patient is inhaling. This results in a dramatic increase in the efficiency of delivery of the surfactant and a corresponding reduction in losses of surfactant to the atmosphere.
As the result of the unique combination of an aerosol generator, preferably a vibrating aperture-type aerosol generator, with a pressure-assisted breathing system, preferably a CPAP system having one or more or the efficiency-improving features set forth above and in the aforementioned co-pending patent applications, from 10–80% of the lung surfactant may be inhaled by the patient in the method of the present invention. In particularly preferred embodiments, greater than 30% of the lung surfactant may be delivered to the patient's lungs.
The following example will illustrate the increase in efficiency resulting from the practice of the present invention, but the present invention is not limited to the details set forth therein. For example, the following example is not limited to the delivery of any particular aerosolized medicament.
a and 7b are diagrams of nCPAP systems 100 and 200 that may be used for measuring aerosol delivery with a simulated infant breathing pattern during nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP). nCPAP systems 100 and 200 comprise breath simulators 101 and 201, consisting of adapters with orifices representing infant size nasal prongs 102 and 202 (Argyle; n=3) connected to absolute filters 103 and 203, attached to reciprocating pump animal ventilators 104 and 204 (Harvard Apparatus) to form a nCPAP system. Lung simulators 100 and 200 may be set to infant ventilatory parameters (VT 10 ml, respiratory rate 40 breaths per minute). A constant oxygen flow of 10 L/min from ventilators 104 and 204 may be used to generate a CPAP of 5 cm H2O regulated by threshold resistors 105 and 205.
In both systems, a liquid medicament (0.5 mL of 0.5% albuterol sulfate) may be aerosolized with a nebulizer 106 and 206 placed in a circuit of the nCPAP system. Drug may be collected on filters 103 and 104 placed distal to the nasal prongs 102 and 202, and the collected drug may be assayed using High Pressure Liquid Chromatography (HPLC). Care should be taken to assure that only aerosol reaches the filters, and that condensate remains in the breathing circuit, nebulizer or adapter. This may be accomplished by tilting the system so that nebulizers 106 and 206 are lower than respective filter elements 103 and 203. The efficiency of the nCPAP system may then be measured by expressing the amount of drug collected on the filter as a percentage of the drug dose placed in the nebulizer.
In Example 1, nebulizer 106 may comprise a standard jet nebulizer placed so as to discharge aerosolized medicament into the main air flow in the pressure-generating circuit of nCPAP system 100, as shown in
As illustrated in
As the above examples demonstrate, a nebulizer incorporating a vibrating aperture-type aerosol generator in accordance with the present invention is generally more efficient than a standard jet nebulizer when used to deliver aerosolized surfactant and other medicaments to a patient's airway through a typical CPAP system. In one embodiment of the invention, that efficiency can be even more dramatically improved by placing a particularly preferred small nebulizer including vibrating aperture-type aerosol generator in the lower-flow respiratory circuit of the CPAP system, most preferably in close proximity to the patient's airway. In still another embodiment of the invention, even more efficiency may be achieved by generating the aerosol intermittently, for example, only during inhalation and interrupting generation during exhalation.
It is understood that while the invention has been described above in connection with preferred specific embodiments, the description and drawings are intended to illustrate and not limit the scope of the invention, which is defined by the appended claims and their equivalents.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/828,765, filed Apr. 20, 2004; U.S. application Ser. No. 10/883,115, filed Jun. 30, 2004; and U.S. application Ser. No. 10/957,321, filed Sep. 9, 2004, the entire contents of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
550315 | Allen | Nov 1895 | A |
809159 | Willis et al. | Jan 1906 | A |
1680616 | Horst | Aug 1928 | A |
2022520 | Philbrick | Nov 1935 | A |
2101304 | Wright | Dec 1937 | A |
2158615 | Wright | May 1939 | A |
2187528 | Wing | Jan 1940 | A |
2223541 | Baker | Dec 1940 | A |
2266706 | Fox et al. | Dec 1941 | A |
2283333 | Martin | May 1942 | A |
2292381 | Klagges | Aug 1942 | A |
2360297 | Wing | Oct 1944 | A |
2375770 | Dahlberg | May 1945 | A |
2383098 | Wheaton | Aug 1945 | A |
2404063 | Healy | Jul 1946 | A |
2430023 | Longmaid | Nov 1947 | A |
2474996 | Wallis | Jul 1949 | A |
2512004 | Wing | Jun 1950 | A |
2521657 | Severy | Sep 1950 | A |
2681041 | Zodtner et al. | Jun 1954 | A |
2705007 | Gerber | Mar 1955 | A |
2735427 | Sullivan | Feb 1956 | A |
2764946 | Henderson | Oct 1956 | A |
2764979 | Henderson | Oct 1956 | A |
2779623 | Eisenkraft | Jan 1957 | A |
2935970 | Morse et al. | May 1960 | A |
3103310 | Lang | Sep 1963 | A |
3325031 | Singler | Jun 1967 | A |
3411854 | Rosler et al. | Nov 1968 | A |
3515348 | Coffman, Jr. | Jun 1970 | A |
3550864 | East | Dec 1970 | A |
3558052 | Dunn | Jan 1971 | A |
3561444 | Boucher | Feb 1971 | A |
3563415 | Ogle | Feb 1971 | A |
3680954 | Frank | Aug 1972 | A |
3719328 | Hindman | Mar 1973 | A |
3738574 | Guntersdorfer et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3771982 | Dobo | Nov 1973 | A |
3790079 | Berglund et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
3804329 | Martner | Apr 1974 | A |
3812854 | Michaels et al. | May 1974 | A |
3838686 | Szekely | Oct 1974 | A |
3842833 | Ogle | Oct 1974 | A |
3865106 | Palush | Feb 1975 | A |
3903884 | Huston et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3906950 | Cocozza | Sep 1975 | A |
3908654 | Lhoest et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3950760 | Rauch et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
3951313 | Coniglione | Apr 1976 | A |
3958249 | DeMaine et al. | May 1976 | A |
3970250 | Drews | Jul 1976 | A |
3983740 | Danel | Oct 1976 | A |
3993223 | Welker, III et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4005435 | Lundquist et al. | Jan 1977 | A |
4020834 | Bird | May 1977 | A |
4030492 | Simbrumer | Jun 1977 | A |
4052986 | Scaife | Oct 1977 | A |
4059384 | Holland et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
D246574 | Meierhoefer | Dec 1977 | S |
4076021 | Thompson | Feb 1978 | A |
4083368 | Freezer | Apr 1978 | A |
4094317 | Wasnich | Jun 1978 | A |
4101041 | Mauro, Jr. et al. | Jul 1978 | A |
4106503 | Rsenthal et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4109174 | Hodgson | Aug 1978 | A |
4113809 | Abair et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
D249958 | Meierhoefer | Oct 1978 | S |
4119096 | Drews | Oct 1978 | A |
4121583 | Chen | Oct 1978 | A |
4159803 | Cameto et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4207990 | Weiler et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4210155 | Grimes | Jul 1980 | A |
4226236 | Genese | Oct 1980 | A |
4240081 | Devitt | Dec 1980 | A |
4240417 | Holever | Dec 1980 | A |
4248227 | Thomas | Feb 1981 | A |
4261512 | Zierenberg | Apr 1981 | A |
D259213 | Pagels | May 1981 | S |
4268460 | Boiarski et al. | May 1981 | A |
4294407 | Reichl et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
4298045 | Weiler et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4299784 | Hense | Nov 1981 | A |
4300546 | Kruber | Nov 1981 | A |
4301093 | Eck | Nov 1981 | A |
4319155 | Makai et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4334531 | Reichl et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4336544 | Donald et al. | Jun 1982 | A |
4338576 | Takahashi et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4340044 | Levy et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4368476 | Uehara et al. | Jan 1983 | A |
4368850 | Szekely | Jan 1983 | A |
4374707 | Pollack | Feb 1983 | A |
4389071 | Johnson, Jr. et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
4408719 | Last | Oct 1983 | A |
4428802 | Kanai et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4431136 | Janner et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4454877 | Miller et al. | Jun 1984 | A |
4465234 | Maehara et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4474251 | Johnson, Jr. | Oct 1984 | A |
4474326 | Takahashi | Oct 1984 | A |
4475113 | Lee et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4479609 | Maeda et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4484577 | Sackner et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4502481 | Christian | Mar 1985 | A |
4512341 | Lester | Apr 1985 | A |
4530464 | Yamamoto et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4533082 | Maehara et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
4539575 | Nilsson | Sep 1985 | A |
4544933 | Heinzl | Oct 1985 | A |
4546361 | Brescia et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4550325 | Viola | Oct 1985 | A |
4566452 | Farr | Jan 1986 | A |
4591883 | Isayama | May 1986 | A |
4593291 | Howkins | Jun 1986 | A |
4605167 | Maehara | Aug 1986 | A |
4613326 | Szwarc | Sep 1986 | A |
4620201 | Heinzl et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4628890 | Freeman | Dec 1986 | A |
4632311 | Nakane et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4658269 | Rezanka | Apr 1987 | A |
4659014 | Soth et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4677975 | Edgar et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4678680 | Abowitz | Jul 1987 | A |
4679551 | Anthony | Jul 1987 | A |
4681264 | Johnson, Jr. | Jul 1987 | A |
4693853 | Falb et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4702418 | Carter et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4722906 | Guire | Feb 1988 | A |
4753579 | Murphy | Jun 1988 | A |
4790479 | Matsumoto et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4793339 | Matsumoto et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4796807 | Bendig et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4799622 | Ishikawa et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4805609 | Roberts et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4819629 | Jonson | Apr 1989 | A |
4819834 | Thiel | Apr 1989 | A |
4826080 | Ganser | May 1989 | A |
4826759 | Guire et al. | May 1989 | A |
4828886 | Hieber | May 1989 | A |
4843445 | Stemme | Jun 1989 | A |
4849303 | Graham et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4850534 | Takahashi et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4852563 | Gross | Aug 1989 | A |
4865006 | Nogi et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4871489 | Ketcham | Oct 1989 | A |
4872553 | Suzuki et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4877989 | Drews et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4888516 | Daeges et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4922901 | Brooks et al. | May 1990 | A |
4926915 | Deussen et al. | May 1990 | A |
4934358 | Nilsson et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4951661 | Sladek | Aug 1990 | A |
4954225 | Bakewell | Sep 1990 | A |
4957239 | Tempelman | Sep 1990 | A |
4964521 | Wieland et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
D312209 | Morrow et al. | Nov 1990 | S |
4968299 | Ahlstrand et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4971665 | Sexton | Nov 1990 | A |
4973493 | Guire | Nov 1990 | A |
4976259 | Higson et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
4979959 | Guire | Dec 1990 | A |
4994043 | Ysebaert | Feb 1991 | A |
5002048 | Makiej, Jr. | Mar 1991 | A |
5002582 | Guire et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5007419 | Weinstein et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5016024 | Lam et al. | May 1991 | A |
5021701 | Takahashi et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5022587 | Hochstein | Jun 1991 | A |
5024733 | Abys et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5046627 | Hansen | Sep 1991 | A |
5062419 | Rider | Nov 1991 | A |
5063396 | Shiokawa et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5063922 | Hakkinen | Nov 1991 | A |
5073484 | Swanson et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5076266 | Babaev | Dec 1991 | A |
5080093 | Raabe et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5080649 | Vetter | Jan 1992 | A |
5086765 | Levine | Feb 1992 | A |
5086785 | Gentile et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5115803 | Sioutas | May 1992 | A |
5115971 | Greenspan et al. | May 1992 | A |
D327008 | Friedman | Jun 1992 | S |
5122116 | Kriesel et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5129579 | Conte | Jul 1992 | A |
5134993 | Van Der Linden et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5139016 | Waser | Aug 1992 | A |
5140740 | Weigelt | Aug 1992 | A |
5147073 | Cater | Sep 1992 | A |
5148802 | Sanders et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5152456 | Ross et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5157372 | Langford | Oct 1992 | A |
5164740 | Ivri | Nov 1992 | A |
5169029 | Behar et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5170782 | Kocinski | Dec 1992 | A |
5180482 | Abys et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5186164 | Raghuprasad | Feb 1993 | A |
5186166 | Riggs et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5198157 | Bechet | Mar 1993 | A |
5201322 | Henry et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5213860 | Laing | May 1993 | A |
5217148 | Cater | Jun 1993 | A |
5217492 | Guire et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5227168 | Chvapil | Jul 1993 | A |
5230496 | Shillington et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5245995 | Sullivan et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5248087 | Dressler | Sep 1993 | A |
5258041 | Guire et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5261601 | Ross et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5263992 | Guire | Nov 1993 | A |
5279568 | Cater | Jan 1994 | A |
5297734 | Toda | Mar 1994 | A |
5299739 | Takahashi et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5303854 | Cater | Apr 1994 | A |
5309135 | Langford | May 1994 | A |
5312281 | Takahashi et al. | May 1994 | A |
5313955 | Rodder | May 1994 | A |
5319971 | Osswald et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5320603 | Vetter et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5322057 | Raabe et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5342011 | Short | Aug 1994 | A |
5342504 | Hirano et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5347998 | Hodson et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5348189 | Cater | Sep 1994 | A |
5350116 | Cater | Sep 1994 | A |
5355872 | Riggs et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5357946 | Kee et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5372126 | Blau | Dec 1994 | A |
5383906 | Burchett et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5388571 | Roberts et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5392768 | Johansson et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5396883 | Knupp et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5414075 | Swan et al. | May 1995 | A |
5415161 | Ryder | May 1995 | A |
5419315 | Rubsamen | May 1995 | A |
5426458 | Wenzel et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5431155 | Marelli | Jul 1995 | A |
5435282 | Haber et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5435297 | Klein | Jul 1995 | A |
5437267 | Weinstein et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5445141 | Kee et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
D362390 | Weiler | Sep 1995 | S |
5449502 | Igusa et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5452711 | Gault | Sep 1995 | A |
5458135 | Patton et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5458289 | Cater | Oct 1995 | A |
5474059 | Cooper | Dec 1995 | A |
5477992 | Jinks et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5479920 | Piper et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5485850 | Dietz | Jan 1996 | A |
5487378 | Robertson et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5489266 | Grimard | Feb 1996 | A |
5497944 | Weston et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
D369212 | Snell | Apr 1996 | S |
5511726 | Greenspan et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5512329 | Guire et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5512474 | Clapper et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5515841 | Robertson et al. | May 1996 | A |
5515842 | Ramseyer et al. | May 1996 | A |
5516043 | Manna et al. | May 1996 | A |
5518179 | Humberstone et al. | May 1996 | A |
5529055 | Gueret | Jun 1996 | A |
5533497 | Ryder | Jul 1996 | A |
5537997 | Mechlenburg et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5542410 | Goodman et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5549102 | Lintl et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5560837 | Trueba | Oct 1996 | A |
5563056 | Swan et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
D375352 | Bologna | Nov 1996 | S |
5579757 | McMahon et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5582330 | Iba | Dec 1996 | A |
5584285 | Salter et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5586550 | Ivri et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5588166 | Burnett | Dec 1996 | A |
5601077 | Imbert | Feb 1997 | A |
5609798 | Liu et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5632878 | Kitano | May 1997 | A |
5635096 | Singer et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5637460 | Swan et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5647349 | Ohki et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5653227 | Barnes et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5654007 | Johnson et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5654162 | Guire et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5654460 | Rong | Aug 1997 | A |
5657926 | Toda | Aug 1997 | A |
5660166 | Lloyd | Aug 1997 | A |
5664557 | Makiej, Jr. | Sep 1997 | A |
5664706 | Cater | Sep 1997 | A |
5665068 | Takamura | Sep 1997 | A |
5666946 | Langenback | Sep 1997 | A |
5670999 | Takeuchi et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5685491 | Marks et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5692644 | Gueret | Dec 1997 | A |
5694923 | Hete et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5707818 | Chudzik et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5709202 | Lloyd et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5714360 | Swan et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5714551 | Bezwada et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5718222 | Lloyd et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
D392184 | Weiler | Mar 1998 | S |
5724957 | Rubsamen et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5744515 | Clapper | Apr 1998 | A |
5752502 | King | May 1998 | A |
5755218 | Johansson et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758637 | Ivri et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5775506 | Grabenkort | Jul 1998 | A |
5788665 | Sekins | Aug 1998 | A |
5788819 | Onishi et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5790151 | Mills | Aug 1998 | A |
5810004 | Ohki et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5819730 | Stone et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5823179 | Grychowski et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5823428 | Humberstone et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5829723 | Brunner et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5836515 | Fonzes | Nov 1998 | A |
5839617 | Cater et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842468 | Denyer et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5862802 | Bird | Jan 1999 | A |
5865171 | Cinquin | Feb 1999 | A |
5878900 | Hansen | Mar 1999 | A |
5893515 | Hahn et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5894841 | Voges | Apr 1999 | A |
5897008 | Hansen | Apr 1999 | A |
5910698 | Yagi | Jun 1999 | A |
5915377 | Coffee | Jun 1999 | A |
5918637 | Fleischman | Jul 1999 | A |
5925019 | Ljungquist | Jul 1999 | A |
5938117 | Ivri | Aug 1999 | A |
5950619 | Van Der Linden et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5954268 | Joshi et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5960792 | Lloyd et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5964417 | Amann et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5970974 | Van Der Linden et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5976344 | Abys et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5993805 | Sutton et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6000396 | Melker et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6007518 | Kriesel et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6012450 | Rubsamen | Jan 2000 | A |
6014970 | Ivri et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6026809 | Abrams et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029666 | Aloy et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032665 | Psaros | Mar 2000 | A |
6037587 | Dowell et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6039696 | Bell | Mar 2000 | A |
6045215 | Coulman | Apr 2000 | A |
6045874 | Himes | Apr 2000 | A |
6047818 | Warby et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055869 | Stemme et al. | May 2000 | A |
6060128 | Kim et al. | May 2000 | A |
6062212 | Davison et al. | May 2000 | A |
6068148 | Weiler | May 2000 | A |
6085740 | Ivri et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6096011 | Trombley, III et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6105877 | Coffee | Aug 2000 | A |
6106504 | Urrutia | Aug 2000 | A |
6116234 | Genova et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6123413 | Agarwal et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6139674 | Markham et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6142146 | Abrams et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6145963 | Pidwerbecki et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6146915 | Pidwerbecki et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6152130 | Abrams et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6155676 | Etheridge et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6158431 | Poole | Dec 2000 | A |
6161536 | Redmon et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6163588 | Matsumoto et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6182662 | McGhee | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6186141 | Pike et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6196218 | Voges | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6196219 | Hess et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6205999 | Ivri et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6216916 | Maddox et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6223746 | Jewett et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6235177 | Borland et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6254219 | Agarwal et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269810 | Brooker et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6270473 | Schwebel | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6273342 | Terada et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6318640 | Coffee | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328030 | Kidwell et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6328033 | Avrahami | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6341732 | Martin et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6358058 | Strupat et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6394363 | Arnott et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6402046 | Loser | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6405934 | Hess et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6427682 | Klimowicz et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6443146 | Voges | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6443366 | Hirota et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6467476 | Ivri et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6467477 | Frank et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6530370 | Heinonen | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6540153 | Ivri | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6540154 | Ivri et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6543443 | Klimowicz et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6546927 | Litherland et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6550472 | Litherland et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6554201 | Klimowicz et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6581595 | Murdock et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6615824 | Power | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6629646 | Ivri | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6640804 | Ivri | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6651650 | Yamamoto et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6688304 | Gonda et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6705315 | Sullivan et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6705316 | Blythe et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6725858 | Loescher | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6732944 | Litherland et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6745768 | Colla et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6745770 | McAuliffe et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6755189 | Ivri et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6769626 | Haveri | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6782886 | Narayan et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6810876 | Berthon-Jones | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6814071 | Klimowicz et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6817361 | Berthon-Jones et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6840240 | Berthon-Jones et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6845770 | Klimowicz et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6851626 | Patel et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6860268 | Bohn et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6904906 | Salter et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
20010013554 | Borland et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010015737 | Truninger et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20020011247 | Ivri et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020023650 | Gunaratnam et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020033178 | Farrell et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020036601 | Puckeridge et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020078958 | Stenzler | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020104530 | Ivri et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020121274 | Borland et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020134372 | Loeffler et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020134374 | Loeffler et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020134375 | Loeffler et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020134377 | Loeffler et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020162551 | Litherland | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020195107 | Smaldone | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030140921 | Smith et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030145859 | Bohn et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030150445 | Power et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030150446 | Patel et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030226906 | Ivri | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040000598 | Ivri | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040004133 | Ivri et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040011358 | Smaldone et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040035413 | Smaldone et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040035490 | Power | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040050947 | Power et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040139963 | Ivri et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139968 | Loeffler et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040188534 | Litherland et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040194783 | McAuliffe et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040226561 | Colla et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040226566 | Gunaratnam et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040256488 | Loeffler et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050011514 | Power et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050039746 | Grychowski et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050139211 | Alston et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050150496 | Smaldone | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050211245 | Smaldone et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050211253 | Smaldone et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050220763 | Condos et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050235987 | Smaldone et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050284469 | Tobia et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
477 885 | Sep 1969 | CH |
555 681 | Nov 1974 | CH |
11 03 522 | Mar 1961 | DE |
3513628 | Oct 1986 | DE |
0 049 636 | Apr 1982 | EP |
0 103 161 | Mar 1984 | EP |
0 134 847 | Mar 1985 | EP |
0 178 925 | Apr 1986 | EP |
0 387 222 | Sep 1990 | EP |
0 432 992 | Jun 1991 | EP |
0 476 991 | Mar 1992 | EP |
0 480 615 | Apr 1992 | EP |
0 510 648 | Oct 1992 | EP |
0 516 565 | Dec 1992 | EP |
0 542 723 | May 1993 | EP |
0 933 138 | Apr 1999 | EP |
0 923 957 | Jun 1999 | EP |
1 142 600 | Oct 2001 | EP |
973 458 | Oct 1964 | GB |
1 454 597 | Nov 1976 | GB |
2 073 616 | Oct 1981 | GB |
2 101 500 | Jan 1983 | GB |
2 177 623 | Jan 1987 | GB |
2 240 494 | Jul 1991 | GB |
2 272 389 | May 1994 | GB |
57-023852 | Feb 1982 | JP |
57-105608 | Jul 1982 | JP |
58-061857 | Apr 1983 | JP |
58-139757 | Aug 1983 | JP |
59-142163 | Aug 1984 | JP |
60-004714 | Jan 1985 | JP |
61-008357 | Jan 1986 | JP |
61-215059 | Sep 1986 | JP |
02-135169 | May 1990 | JP |
02-189161 | Jul 1990 | JP |
60-07721 | Jan 1994 | JP |
WO 8203548 | Oct 1982 | WO |
WO 9207600 | May 1992 | WO |
WO 9211050 | Sep 1992 | WO |
WO 9217231 | Oct 1992 | WO |
WO 9301404 | Jan 1993 | WO |
WO 9310910 | Jun 1993 | WO |
WO 9409912 | May 1994 | WO |
WO 9609229 | Mar 1996 | WO |
WO 9917888 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO 0037132 | Jun 2000 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050229926 A1 | Oct 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10957321 | Sep 2004 | US |
Child | 11080279 | US | |
Parent | 10883115 | Jun 2004 | US |
Child | 10957321 | US | |
Parent | 10828765 | Apr 2004 | US |
Child | 10883115 | US |