Claims
- 1. A method for reducing fat storage in an animal comprising:
administering to the animal an agent which reduces an in vivo level of cathepsin L activity such that fat storage by the animal is reduced.
- 2. The method according to claim 1, the method further comprising measuring the in vivo level of cathepsin L activity.
- 3. The method according to claim 2, the method further comprising determining an amount of the agent administered to the animal based on the measured cathepsin L activity.
- 4. The method according to claim 1, the method further comprising measuring a blood sugar level, an insulin level, body mass index and/or a fat content of the animal.
- 5. The method according to claim 4, the method further comprising determining an amount of the agent administered to the animal based on the measured blood sugar level, insulin level, body mass index and/or fat content of the animal.
- 6. The method according to claim 1, wherein reducing the in vivo level of cathepsin L activity comprises reducing a level of expression of cathepsin L by the animal.
- 7. The method according to claim 1, wherein reducing the in vivo level of cathepsin L activity comprises inhibiting cathepsin L expressed by the animal.
- 8. The method according to claim 1, wherein a reduction of the in vivo level of cathepsin L activity is evidenced by a change in a number of adipocytes of the animal.
- 9. The method according to claim 1, wherein a reduction of the in vivo level of cathepsin L activity is evidenced by a change in a level of insulin receptor of the animal.
- 10. The method according to claim 1, wherein a reduction of the in vivo level of cathepsin L activity is evidenced by a change in a level of expression of an CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein.
- 11. The method according to claim 1, wherein the agent is a nucleic acid.
- 12. The method of claim 11, wherein the nucleic acid is selected from the group consisting of an antisense molecule, a ribozyme and a triple helix molecule.
- 13. The method of claim 11, wherein the nucleic acid is an antisense molecule against a portion of the human cathepsin L cDNA sequence [SEQ ID NO: 1].
- 14. The method of claim 11, wherein the nucleic acid is an antisense molecule against a portion of the 5′-end untranslated region of human cathepsin L gene [SEQ ID NO: 5].
- 15. The method according to claim 1, wherein the agent is an antibody.
- 16. The method of claim 15, wherein the antibody is an antibody specifically binding to cathepsin L.
- 17. The method of claim 15, wherein the antibody is a fully human antibody, a monoclonal antibody or a humanized antibody.
- 18. The method of claim 1, wherein the agent is a polypeptide that inhibits the activity of cathepsin L.
- 19. The method of claim 18, wherein the polypeptide is a mutant cystatin C shown in Table 4.
- 20. The method of claim 1, wherein the agent is an epoxysuccinate derivative that inhibits the activity of cathepsin L.
- 21. The method of claim 20, wherein the epoxysuccinate derivative is selected from the group consisting of the epoxysuccinate derivatives listed in Table 4.
- 22. The method of claim 1, wherein the agent is an aziridine-2,3-dicarbonate derivative that inhibits the activity of cathepsin L.
- 23. The method of claim 22, wherein the aziridine-2,3-dicarbonate derivative is selected from the group consisting of the aziridine-2,3-dicarbonate derivatives listed in Table 4.
- 24. The method of claim 1, wherein the agent is a dipeptide hydroxamate that inhibits the activity of cathepsin L.
- 25. The method of claim 24, wherein the dipeptide hydroxamate is selected from the group consisting of the dipeptide hydroxamates listed in Table 4.
- 26. The method of claim 1, wherein the agent is a dipeptide sulfonyl derivative that inhibits the activity of cathepsin L.
- 27. The method of claim 26, wherein the dipeptide sulfonyl derivative is selected from the group consisting of the dipeptide sulfonyl derivatives listed in Table 4.
- 28. The method of claim 1, wherein the agent is a peptide aldehyde derivative that inhibits the activity of cathepsin L.
- 29. The method of claim 28, wherein the peptide aldehyde derivative is selected from the group consisting of the peptide aldehyde derivatives listed in Table 4.
- 30. The method according to claim 1, wherein the agent more significantly reduces the in vivo activity of cathepsins L, K, or S than cathepsin B.
- 31. The method according to claim 1, wherein the agent more significantly reduces the in vivo activity of cathepsin L than cathepsins K or S.
- 32. The method according to claim 1, wherein the agent has at least 10 times greater binding affinity for cathepsin L than cathepsins K or S.
- 33. The method according to claim 1, wherein the agent has at least 100 times greater binding affinity for cathepsin L than cathepsins K or S.
- 34. The method according to claim 1, wherein the agent has at least 1000 times greater binding affinity for cathepsin L than cathepsins K or S.
- 35. The method according to claim 1, wherein the animal is selected from the group consisting of cats, dogs, horses, chickens, turkeys, ostriches, ducks, geese, cattle, pigs, sheep, and goats.
- 36. The method according to claim 1, wherein the animal is a form of livestock.
- 37. A method according to claim 1, wherein the animal has one or more diseases selected from the group consisting of hyperinsulinmia, hyperglycermia, type II diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, muscular dystrophy and infertility.
- 38. The method according to claim 1, wherein the animal is a human.
- 39. A method for reducing a blood sugar level of an animal comprising:
administering to the animal an agent which reduces an in vivo level of cathepsin L activity such that the blood sugar level of the animal is reduced.
- 40. The method according to claim 39, the method further comprising measuring the in vivo level of cathepsin L activity.
- 41. The method according to claim 40, the method further comprising determining an amount of the agent administered to the animal based on the measured cathepsin L activity.
- 42. The method according to claim 39, the method further comprising measuring a blood sugar level, an insulin level, body mass index and/or a fat content of the animal.
- 43. The method according to claim 42, the method further comprising determining an amount of the agent administered to the animal based on the measured blood sugar level, insulin level, body mass index and/or fat content of the animal.
- 44. The method according to claim 39, wherein reducing the in vivo level of cathepsin L activity comprises reducing a level of expression of cathepsin L by the animal.
- 45. The method according to claim 39, wherein reducing the in vivo level of cathepsin L activity comprises inhibiting cathepsin L expressed by the animal.
- 46. The method according to claim 39, wherein a reduction of the in vivo level of cathepsin L activity is evidenced by a change in a number of adipocytes of the animal.
- 47. The method according to claim 39, wherein a reduction of the in vivo level of cathepsin L activity is evidenced by a change in a level of insulin receptor of the animal.
- 48. The method according to claim 39, wherein a reduction of the in vivo level of cathepsin L activity is evidenced by a change in a level of expression of an CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein.
- 49. The method according to claim 39, wherein the agent is a nucleic acid.
- 50. The method of claim 49, wherein the nucleic acid is selected from the group consisting of an antisense molecule, a ribozyme and a triple helix molecule.
- 51. The method of claim 49, wherein the nucleic acid is an antisense molecule against a portion of the human cathepsin L cDNA sequence [SEQ ID NO: 1].
- 52. The method of claim 49, wherein the nucleic acid is an antisense molecule against a portion of the 5′-end untranslated region of human cathepsin L gene [SEQ ID NO: 5].
- 53. The method according to claim 39, wherein the agent is an antibody.
- 54. The method of claim 53, wherein the antibody is an antibody specifically binding to cathepsin L.
- 55. The method of claim 53, wherein the antibody is a fully human antibody, a monoclonal antibody or a humanized antibody.
- 56. The method of claim 39, wherein the agent is a polypeptide that inhibits the activity of cathepsin L.
- 57. The method of claim 56, wherein the polypeptide is a mutant cystatin C shown in Table 4.
- 58. The method of claim 39, wherein the agent is an epoxysuccinate derivative that inhibits the activity of cathepsin L.
- 59. The method of claim 58, wherein the epoxysuccinate derivative is selected from the group consisting of the epoxysuccinate derivatives listed in Table 4.
- 60. The method of claim 39, wherein the agent is an aziridine-2,3-dicarbonate derivative that inhibits the activity of cathepsin L.
- 61. The method of claim 60, wherein the aziridine-2,3-dicarbonate derivative is selected from the group consisting of the aziridine-2,3-dicarbonate derivatives listed in Table 4.
- 62. The method of claim 39, wherein the agent is a dipeptide hydroxamate that inhibits the activity of cathepsin L.
- 63. The method of claim 62, wherein the dipeptide hydroxamate is selected from the group consisting of the dipeptide hydroxamates listed in Table 4.
- 64. The method of claim 39, wherein the agent is a dipeptide sulfonyl derivative that inhibits the activity of cathepsin L.
- 65. The method of claim 64, wherein the dipeptide sulfonyl derivative is selected from the group consisting of the dipeptide sulfonyl derivatives listed in Table 4.
- 66. The method of claim 39, wherein the agent is a peptide aldehyde derivative that inhibits the activity of cathepsin L.
- 67. The method of claim 66, wherein the peptide aldehyde derivative is selected from the group consisting of the peptide aldehyde derivatives listed in Table 4.
- 68. The method according to claim 39, wherein the agent more significantly reduces the in vivo activity of cathepsins L, K, or S than cathepsin B.
- 69. The method according to claim 39, wherein the agent more significantly reduces the in vivo activity of cathepsin L than cathepsins K or S.
- 70. The method according to claim 39, wherein the agent has at least 10 times greater binding affinity for cathepsin L than cathepsins K or S.
- 71. The method according to claim 39, wherein the agent has at least 100 times greater binding affinity for cathepsin L than cathepsins K or S.
- 72. The method according to claim 39, wherein the agent has at least 1000 times greater binding affinity for cathepsin L than cathepsins K or S.
- 73. The method according to claim 39, wherein the animal is selected from the group consisting of cats, dogs, horses, chickens, turkeys, ostriches, ducks, geese, cattle, pigs, sheep, and goats.
- 74. The method according to claim 39, wherein the animal is a form of livestock.
- 75. A method according to claim 39, wherein the animal has one or more diseases selected from the group consisting of hyperinsulinmia, hyperglycermia, type II diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, muscular dystrophy and infertility.
- 76. The method according to claim 39, wherein the animal is a human.
- 77. The method of claim 39, wherein the animal is a human having a blood sugar level higher than 1.26 grams of glucose per liter of blood.
- 78. The method of claim 77, wherein the human has type II diabetes.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
[0001] This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/784,642, filed Feb. 14, 2001 and is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Continuations (1)
|
Number |
Date |
Country |
Parent |
09784642 |
Feb 2001 |
US |
Child |
10462022 |
Jun 2003 |
US |