The present invention relates to methods and apparatus for producing polymer compounds, and in particular for producing nylon compounds suitable for wire and cable jacketing.
A coating, or jacket, of nylon is commonly provided outside a polyvinyl chloride (“PVC”) coating on metallic wires and cables. The nylon jacket may provide oil resistance, abrasion resistance, and flexibility to the wire or cable product.
The nylon formulation used in wire and cable jacketing typically includes one or more polymers, heat stabilizers, lubricants, and other compounds. In a traditional approach, the entire formulation is compounded in a twin screw extruder to homogeneously incorporate each of the additives into the formed nylon pellets.
Improvements in the foregoing processes are desired.
The present disclosure provides methods for mixing nylon compounds and compositions useful in mixing nylon compounds. In one embodiment, the methods and compositions disclosed are useful in producing nylon for wire and cable jacketing. In some embodiments, the disclosed methods provide nylon having a reduced heat history compared to traditional methods. In some embodiments, the disclosed methods and composition provide additional mixing capacity by reducing the amount of nylon that must be incorporated with additives per unit of final nylon composition. In some embodiments, the disclosed methods and compositions provide the ability to select from a plurality of additive concentration levels in the final product by varying the ratio of a masterbatch compound containing a high concentration of the additive to a resin containing a low concentration or no additive.
In one exemplary embodiment, a method of producing a mixture having a predetermined concentration of an additive is provided. The method comprises the steps of: providing a first polymer compound, the first polymer compound comprising a polymer resin and a first concentration of the additive, wherein the first concentration is from 0 wt. % to the predetermined concentration; providing a second polymer compound, the second polymer compound comprising the polymer resin and a second concentration of the additive, wherein the second concentration is greater than the predetermined concentration and the first polymer compound polymer resin is identical to the second polymer compound polymer resin; and combining the first and second polymer compounds to achieve a mixture having the predetermined concentration of the additive.
In another exemplary embodiment, a method of producing a masterbatch having a predetermined concentration of an additive is provided. The method comprises the steps of: incorporating the additive into a polymer resin having a melt point at a temperature above the melt point of the polymer resin to produce a first polymer compound having a concentration of the additive greater than the predetermined concentration; pelletizing the first polymer compound to produce a first plurality of pellets; mixing the first plurality of pellets with a second plurality of pellets to produce a pellet mixture, wherein the second plurality of pellets comprises the polymer resin, wherein the pellet mixture comprises the predetermined concentration of the additive.
In still another exemplary embodiment, a masterbatch composition is provided. The masterbatch comprises: a nylon resin having a melt point; one or more heat stabilizers, said one or more heat stabilizers comprising from 0.8 wt. % to 12 wt. % of the masterbatch; one or more lubricants, said one or more lubricants comprising from 1.5 wt. % to 6 wt. % of the masterbatch; wherein the one or more heat stabilizers and one or more lubricants are incorporated into the nylon resin at a temperature above the melt point to form the masterbatch.
The above mentioned and other features of the invention, and the manner of attaining them, will become more apparent and the invention itself will be better understood by reference to the following description of embodiments of the invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.
Although not so limited, the mixing process described herein is particularly useful in forming pellets for use in nylon jacketing of wire and cable. An exemplary jacketed wire 10 is illustrated in
Nylon jacket 16 is formed from a compound comprising a plurality of additives incorporated into a polymer. In one embodiment, nylon jacket 16 has a formula including various target weight percentages of polymers and additives, such as monomers, heat stabilizers, lubricants, anti-wear additives, and other suitable additives. Exemplary polymers include Nylon 6, or polycaprolactam and Nylon 6, 6, or poly(hexamethylene adipamide). Exemplary monomers include caprolactam. Exemplary heat stabilizers include copper iodide, potassium iodide, potassium bromide, sodium iodide, potassium chloride, other copper halides, and other metallic halides. Exemplary lubricants include ethylene bis stearamide (“EBS”), other organic amides, aluminum stearate, zinc stearate, calcium stearate, other metallic stearates, and other metallic fatty acids. Exemplary anti-wear additives include perfluoropolyether, polytetrafluoroethylene, functional and non-functional polydimethylsiloxane, graphite, molybdenum disulfide, and silicone oil. Other suitable additives may also be used.
Once the additives have been incorporated into the polymer, in step 86 the formulation is then converted into pellets. In step 88, the pellets are provided to an extruder used to produce the jacketed wire. In step 90, the pellets are extruded through a die to form a nylon jacket surrounding the conductive core of the jacketed wire. An insulating layer may also be coated on the conducting core, and the nylon jacket is formed outside the insulating layer, as illustrated in
In one embodiment, the nylon resin provided in step 106 contains no additives. In one embodiment, the nylon resin provided in step 106 consists essentially of nylon 6. In another embodiment, the nylon resin provided in step 106 contains some additives, but at least one additive in the resin is provided at a lower amount compared to the desired final formulation. In another embodiment, the masterbatch or nylon resin provided in steps 104 and 106 is in a form other than as a pellet.
In step 108, the masterbatch pellets provided in step 104 and the nylon resin pellets provided in step 106 are combined. In step 110, the pellets are provided to the extruder. In one embodiment, steps 108 and 110 are performed as a single step. In this embodiment, the masterbatch pellets and nylon resin pellets are directly provided to the extruder. In another embodiment, steps 108 and 110 are performed as separate steps. In this embodiment, the masterbatch pellets and nylon resin pellets are combined to form a dry pellet blend, and the dry pellet blend is directly provided to the extruder. In one embodiment, the dry pellet blend is mixed or dispersed to increase the homogeneity of the blend between the masterbatch pellets and the nylon resin pellets.
In step 112, the combined pellets are extruded into a nylon jacket covering the outside of a nylon jacketed wire, such as illustrated in
In one embodiment, the method 102 illustrated in
In step 124, additional monomer is provided. An exemplary monomer is caprolactam. In an exemplary embodiment, the quantity of monomer provided in step 124 is from as little as about 8%, 9%, 10%, 11%, 12%, 13%, as greater as to about 14%, 15%, 16%, 17%, 18%, of the desired masterbatch by weight, or within a range defined between any pair of the foregoing values. In step 126, one or more heat stabilizing ingredients are provided. Exemplary heat stabilizers include Exemplary heat stabilizers include copper iodide, potassium iodide, potassium bromide, sodium iodide, potassium chloride, other copper halides, and other metallic halides. In step 128, one or more lubricants are provided. Exemplary lubricants include ethylene bis stearamide (“EBS”), other organic amides, aluminum stearate, zinc stearate, calcium stearate, and other metallic stearates.
In step 130, the ingredients provided in steps 122, 124, 126, and 128 are combined. In one embodiment, step 130 is performed in a twin screw extruder or mixer. In another embodiment, step 130 is performed in a single screw extruder or mixer. Other suitable ways of incorporating the additives into the polymer, including but not limited to Brabender mixers, rollers, kneaders, and mills, may also be used. In one embodiment, the masterbatch is combined at a temperature slightly above the melt temperature of the nylon base resin with a single screw or twin screw extruder. In step 132, the masterbatch produced in step 130 is pelletized.
Exemplary masterbatch formulations are provided in Table 1. The masterbatch formulations A20% and B20% include five times the additives as the formulations Target A and Target B. When the masterbatch formulations A20% and B20% are incorporated with additional nylon resin in a weight ratio of 20% masterbatch to 80% nylon resin, the resulting compound will include the same levels of the additives caprolactam, heat stabilizers, and lubricants as the formulations Target A and Target B. Similarly, the masterbatch formulations A10T and B10% include five times the additives as the formulations Target A and Target B. When the masterbatch formulations A10% and B10% are incorporated with additional nylon resin in a weight ratio of 10% masterbatch to 90% nylon resin, the resulting compound will include the same levels of the additives caprolactam, heat stabilizers, and lubricants as the formulations Target A and Target B.
In one embodiment, the masterbatch and nylon resin may be combined in a weight ratio of masterbatch to nylon resin as little as 2:1, 1:1, 1:2, 3:1, 4:1, 5:1 as great as 9:1, 10:1, 19:1, 20:1, 24:1, 25:1, or within a range defined between any pair of the foregoing values.
In one embodiment, based on the desired target and masterbatch loading, the masterbatch compound may include one or more additives in an amount as little as 0.10 wt. %, 0.30 wt. %, 1 wt. %, or 5 wt %, or as great as 10 wt. %, 15 wt. %, 20 wt. %, 25 wt. %, 30 wt. %, 33 wt. %, 30 wt. % or 50 wt. %, or within a range defined between any pair of the foregoing values, based on the total weight of the masterbatch. The nylon resin may be present in an amount as little as 50 wt. %, 60 wt. %, 70 wt. %, or as great as 75 wt. %, 80 wt. %, 90 wt. %, 95 wt. %, or 99 wt. %, or within a range defined between any pair of the foregoing values based on the total weight of the masterbatch.
In one embodiment, the additives may be provided in a form consisting essentially of the additive. In another embodiment, the additive may be provided as part of a mixture comprising the additive and a nylon resin. In one embodiment, the mixture is incorporated into the masterbatch, as illustrated in step 130 (
In one embodiment, the masterbatch compound may include one or more heat stabilizers. Exemplary heat stabilizers include copper iodide, potassium iodide, potassium bromide, sodium iodide, potassium chloride, other copper halides, and other metallic halides. The masterbatch compound may include one or more heat stabilizers in a total amount as little as 0 wt. %, 0.1 wt. %, 0.3 wt. %, 0.5 wt. %, 1 wt. %, 1.5 wt. %, 2 wt. %, 2.5 wt. %, 3 wt. %, 4 wt. %, as great as 5 wt. %, 6 wt. %, 7 wt. %, 8 wt. %, 9 wt. %, 10 wt. %, 11 wt. %, 12 wt. %, or within a range defined between any pair of the foregoing values, based on the total weight of the masterbatch.
In one embodiment, the masterbatch compound may include one or more lubricants. Exemplary lubricants include ethylene bis stearamide (“EBS”), other organic amides, aluminum stearate, zinc stearate, calcium stearate, other metallic stearates, and other metallic fatty acids. The masterbatch compound may include one or more lubricants in a total amount as little as 0 wt. %, 0.1 wt. %, 0.3 wt. %, 0.5 wt. %, 1 wt. %, 1.3 wt. %, 1.5 wt. %, 2 wt. %, 2.5 wt. %, as great as 3 wt. %, 4 wt. %, 5 wt. %, 6 wt. %, 7 wt. %, 8 wt. %, or within a range defined between any pair of the foregoing values, based on the total weight of the masterbatch.
In one embodiment, the masterbatch compound may include one or more monomers such as caprolactam or other suitable monomers in a total amount as little as 0 wt. %, 0.5 wt. %, 1 wt. %, 2 wt. %, 5 wt. %, 10 wt. %, 11 wt. %, as great as 15 wt. %, 16 wt. %, 20 wt. %, 25 wt. %, 30 wt. %, or within a range defined between any pair of the foregoing values, based on the total weight of the masterbatch.
In one embodiment, the masterbatch compound may include one or more anti-wear additives. Exemplary lubricants include perfluoropolyether, polytetrafluoroethylene, functional and non-functional polydimethylsiloxane, graphite, molybdenum disulfide, and silicone oil. The masterbatch compound may include one or more anti-wear additives in a total amount as little as 0 wt. %, 0.1 wt. %, 0.3 wt. %, 0.5 wt. %, 1 wt. %, 1.5 wt. %, 2 wt. %, 2.5 wt. %, as great as 3 wt. %, 4 wt. %, 5 wt. % or within a range defined between any pair of the foregoing values, based on the total weight of the masterbatch.
In one embodiment, the masterbatch produced in method 120 is provided as masterbatch pellets in step 104 of method 102. In an exemplary embodiment, the masterbatch pellets provided in step 104 are from about 5% to about 20% by weight of the desired dry pellet blend weight and the nylon resin pellets provided in step 106 are from about 95% to about 80% by weight the desired dry pellet blend weight. In one embodiment, the masterbatch pellets provided in step 104 are present in an amount of as little as 5% by weight, 10% by weight, or 15% by weight, or as great as 20% by weight, 25% by weight, 33% by weight, or 50% by weight, of the desired dry pellet blend weight or within a range defined between any pair of the foregoing values, with the nylon resin pellets comprising the remainder desired dry pellet blend weight.
In step 144, one or more heat stabilizing ingredients are provided. Exemplary heat stabilizers include copper iodide and potassium iodide. In step 146, one or more lubricants are provided. Exemplary lubricants include EBS and aluminum stearate. In step 148, the ingredients provided in steps 142, 144, and 146 are combined. In one embodiment, step 148 is performed in a twin screw extruder or mixer. In another embodiment, step 148 is performed in a single screw extruder or mixer. Other suitable ways of incorporating the additives into the polymer, including but not limited to Brabender mixers, rollers, kneaders, and mills, may also be used. In one embodiment, the masterbatch is combined at a temperature slightly above the melt temperature of the nylon base resin with a single screw or twin screw extruder. In step 150, the masterbatch produced in step 148 is pelletized.
In one embodiment, the masterbatch produced in method 140 is provided as masterbatch pellets in step 104 of method 102. In an exemplary embodiment, the masterbatch pellets provided in step 104 are from about 5% to about 20% by weight of the desired dry pellet blend weight and the nylon resin pellets provided in step 106 are from about 95% to about 80% by weight the desired dry pellet blend weight.
In one embodiment, the nylon resin pellets provided in step 106 of method 102 comprise the same nylon resin as provided in step 122 of method 120. In another embodiment, the nylon resin pellets provided in step 106 of method 102 comprise the same nylon resin as provided in step 142 of method 140.
Two exemplary formulations A and B were compared using wholly compounded and masterbatch mix processes. Formulations in weight percent are given in Table 2. Formulation A was intended as a wholly compounded formulation. Formulation A20% was intended to have five times the level of additives as formulation A, such that when mixed in a ratio of 20% by weight of A20% and 80% by weight of raw pellets, the resulting mixture would have the same level of additives as formulation A. Formulation A10% was intended to have ten times the level of additives as formulation A, such that when mixed in a ratio of 10% by weight of A10% and 90% by weight of raw pellets, the resulting mixture would have the same level of additives as formulation A. Similarly, formulation B was intended as a wholly compounded formulation, and formulations B20% and B10% were intended to have five times and ten times the level of additives, respectfully, as formulation B, such that a mixture with raw nylon pellets in a ratio of 20% by weight of B20% and 80% by weight of raw pellets or 10% by weight of B10% and 90% by weight of raw pellets, the resulting mixture would have the same level of additives as formulation B.
The nylon resin pellets had an extractable content of about 4.5% as determined by ISO 6427. Ground nylon was provided in each formulation. The ground nylon was a ground form of the nylon resin pellets, and provided to assist in the transport and dispersing of the other additives in the mixing process. The caprolactam, lubricants, and heat stabilizers were mixed with the ground nylon prior to incorporation with the nylon resin pellets.
Each formulation was prepared using a Liestritz 27 mm extruder. The resulting formulations for A and B were then set aside. Compounds A10%, A20%, B10% and B20% were then mixed with additional nylon resin pellets in the extruder. For compound A10%, 10% by weight of A10% and 90% by weight of additional nylon resin pellets were mixed. For compound A20%, 20% by weight of A20% and 80% by weight of additional nylon resin pellets were mixed. For compound B10%, 10% by weight of B10% and 90% by weight of additional nylon resin pellets were mixed. For compound B20%, 20% by weight of B20% and 80% by weight of additional nylon resin pellets were mixed.
After preparation, each formulation was injection molded into test samples using an Arburg 320S Injection Molding machine. Tensile test samples were prepared according to ISO 527-1 and flexural (3-point bend) samples were prepared according to ASTM D790. The molding conditions are presented in Table 3.
After preparation, representative samples of each formulation were tested for tensile strength and tensile according to ISO 527-1 and flexural strength and flexural modulus according to ASTM D790, herein incorporated by reference. For each test, 25 representative dry as molded (“DAM”) samples of each formulation were tested. The average and standard deviation for the DAM samples for each test is presented in Table 4.
The results given in Table 4 are also presented in
The results given in Table 5 are also presented in
Processing data for wholly compounded samples A and B and masterbatch compounded samples A20%, A10%, B10%, and B5% are presented in Table 6.
As shown in Table 6, in general, the wholly compound formulations resulted in substantially similar processing properties as the masterbatch samples. The masterbatch samples resulted in lower melt temperatures and pressures than the wholly compounded samples, which may be the result of the higher concentrations of lubricant in the masterbatch compounds. Both wholly compounded and masterbatch samples achieved their respective throughput set points.
Two development samples were run on a trial production run of material. The trial produced 14 gauge solid copper thermoplastic high heat-resistant nylon-coated (THHN) wire employing PVC insulation and nylon jacketing suitable for use in UL QMTT2 nylon component certification testing. The copper diameter was approximately 0.06″, with an approximately 0.016″ thick PVC insulation layer and 0.0042″ nylon layer applied.
The production trials were run with two different sets of nylon pellets. The first formation was designed to be a wholly compounded mix. The first formulation was mixed in the standard procedure in which the nylon, caprolactam, and additives were incorporated together in a twin-screw extruder.
The second compound was designed to be a masterbatch mix. The second formulation was a mix of 20% masterbatch pellets and 80% raw nylon pellets. The masterbatch contained five times the additives and caprolactam as the wholly compounded material. The masterbatch and raw nylon pellets were blended together in a ration of 4 parts by weight of raw nylon to 1 part by weight of masterbatch prior to extrusion.
The production trial used a single-screw extruder 2.5 inches in diameter, 24/1 L/D ratio. The trial was run at a line rate of 1400 feet per minute.
Limited monomer off-gassing was observed at the die for the second formulation, but no interference with downstream measurement devices was observed. No differences in processability or product were observed between the first and second formulations.
Gel permeation chromatography columns using high-performance liquid chromatography were used to compare the molecular weights of the wholly compounded and masterbatch mixed stocks. A first formulation was mixed as a wholly compounded mix. The second compound was mixed as a masterbatch mix, comprising a mix of 20% masterbatch pellets and 80% raw nylon pellets. The masterbatch contained five times the additives and caprolactam as the wholly compounded material. The masterbatch and raw nylon pellets were blended together in a ratio of 4 parts by weight of raw nylon to 1 part by weight of masterbatch prior to extrusion.
Three samples of each compound were prepared by mixing 10±1 mg of sample in powder form with 10 mL of chloroform and 50 μL of trifluoroacetic acid. The samples were shaken for 16 hours at room temperature to bring the sample components into solution with a VWR Digital Vortex Mixer. Each sample was filtered through a 0.22 μm pore diameter membrane filter and transferred to an auto-sampler vial.
The samples were tested using Waters Alliance HPLC with 2695 Separation Module and 2489 UV-Visible Detector with 2 Agilent PLgel 5 μm MIXED-C columns (7.5 mm*300 mm) in series. The column temperature was 25° C., and chloroform was used as the mobile phase with a 1.0 mL/min flow rate. An injection volume of 100 μL was used. A UV-Visible detector for 254 nm was used over the 30 minute run time to determine the molecular weight distribution of each sample.
The GPC chromatograph for the wholly compounded sample is presented in
Wire jacketed with PVC insulation and wholly compounded nylon was compared to wire jacketed with PVC insulation and masterbatch mixed nylon using Underwriters Laboratory UL83 QMTT2 Certification Testing.
A first sample wire was produced using 14 AWG solid copper, type THHN/THWN employing 11.9 mils minimum PVC insulation and a minimum thickness dimension of the nylon of 3.7 mils of a first nylon formulation that was mixed as a wholly compounded mix. A second sample wire was produced using 14 AWG solid copper, type THHN/THWN employing 11.6 mils minimum PVC insulation and a minimum thickness dimension of the nylon of 3.6 mils of a second nylon formulation that was mixed as a masterbatch mix, comprising a mix of 20% masterbatch pellets and 80% raw nylon pellets. The masterbatch contained five times the additives and caprolactam as the wholly compounded material. The masterbatch and raw nylon pellets were blended together in a ratio of 4 parts by weight of raw nylon to 1 part by weight of masterbatch prior to extrusion.
The tensile strength and elongation of the PVC insulation of the two sample wires were tested following the full assembly being conditioned in various fluids at various temperatures per UL 1581, 4th edition. The tensile strength and modulus of each conditioned sample was compared to the tensile strength and modulus of an original non-conditioned sample. The results can be found in Table 7. Generally, a higher result is desirable.
A sample of each wire was conditioned at −25° C. for 4 hours then turned 4 times around a 0.312 in mandrel. No cracks, splits, tears, or circumferential depressions were visible for either sample. A sample of each wire was conditioned 7 days at 136° C., then returned to room temperature and turned 4 times around a 0.312 in mandrel. No cracks, splits, tears, or circumferential depressions were visible for either sample. A sample of each wire was conditioned 1 hour at 121° C., then turned 4 times around a 0.125 in mandrel. No cracks, splits, tears, or circumferential depressions were visible for either sample.
A sample of each wire was loaded with 500 grams and conditioned 1 hour at 136° C. Generally, a lower result is desirable. The wholly compounded sample had a deformation of 10%, while the masterbatch mixed sample had a deformation of 5%.
Ten replicates of each wire were subjected to increasingly higher force until a short circuit occurred. Generally, a higher required force is desirable. The wholly compounded sample had an average required force of 228 pounds, while the master batch mixed sample had an average required force of 238 pounds.
While the present disclosure is primarily directed to mixing nylon formulations for wire and cable jacketing, it should be understood that the features disclosed herein may have application to the mixing processes of other formulations.
While this invention has been described as relative to exemplary designs, the present invention may be further modified within the spirit and scope of this disclosure. Further, this application is intended to cover such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice in the art to which this invention pertains.
This application claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/663,220, filed Jun. 22, 2012, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4391936 | Waggoner | Jul 1983 | A |
4448934 | Weaver | May 1984 | A |
5236645 | Jones | Aug 1993 | A |
5242975 | Modic | Sep 1993 | A |
5340884 | Mills et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5626662 | Urban | May 1997 | A |
5723522 | Bergmann | Mar 1998 | A |
5726278 | Kenmochi | Mar 1998 | A |
5747560 | Christiani et al. | May 1998 | A |
5759925 | Ballard et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5763084 | Michels et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5800746 | Jones | Sep 1998 | A |
5833893 | Jones | Nov 1998 | A |
5834089 | Jones | Nov 1998 | A |
5945469 | Heath et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5961734 | Kight | Oct 1999 | A |
6120718 | Kotek | Sep 2000 | A |
6149850 | Gannon | Nov 2000 | A |
6188026 | Cope et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6289928 | Helms, Jr. et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296920 | Buehler | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6303069 | Anhalt | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6362288 | Brewer | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6387519 | Anderson et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6391239 | Helms, Jr. et al. | May 2002 | B2 |
6515056 | Treutlein | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6515058 | Tomiyama et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6569931 | Furukawa et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6610777 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6664299 | Cook | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6712997 | Won et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6730249 | Sears et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6942823 | Terada | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6964746 | Schlosser et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6987144 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7151127 | Stoeppelmann et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7182888 | Terada | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7192909 | Richter et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7226963 | Koevoets | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7241403 | Hossan | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7312263 | Schmid et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7390842 | Kieser | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7411129 | Kummer | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7439284 | Alger et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7449507 | Fishburn | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7462656 | Keulen | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7534822 | Elkovitch | May 2009 | B2 |
7557301 | Kummer | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7598307 | Kuehnle | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7749024 | Chambers | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7763674 | Gijsman et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7846996 | Pask et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7902287 | Grant | Mar 2011 | B2 |
8026309 | Halahmi et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8043119 | Kummar | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8066933 | Monsheimer | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8158721 | Stevenson | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8382518 | Chambers | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8383712 | David | Feb 2013 | B2 |
20020006998 | Furukawa et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020096356 | Kim et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020145132 | Won et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030064876 | Greiner et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20050032943 | Silvestro | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050131126 | Yang et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060065428 | Kummer | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060065430 | Kummer | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060068085 | Reece | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060068086 | Reece | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060088657 | Reece | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060128907 | Yu | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060151196 | Kummer | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060157303 | Kummer | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060191621 | Kummer | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060249298 | Reese | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060249299 | Kummer | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060251802 | Kummer | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070072972 | Kuhnle et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070154668 | Rhee et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080066946 | Kummer | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080318065 | Sherman et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20100000784 | Kummer | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100063191 | Hirono | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100113661 | Senff | May 2010 | A1 |
20100255186 | Montes | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110105697 | Buhler | May 2011 | A1 |
20110166242 | Kawaguchi et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110172338 | Murakami et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110174521 | Hernandez-Hernandez et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110281984 | Garois et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120015202 | Kenens | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120041132 | Monsheime | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120296036 | Allen | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130193614 | Gesteira | Aug 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 02079318 | Oct 2002 | WO |
WO 2006016895 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 2007032573 | Mar 2007 | WO |
WO 2007041344 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007081372 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO 2011117709 | Sep 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT ISR & Written Opinion issued in PCT/US2013/0046258 dated Sep. 25, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130344236 A1 | Dec 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61663220 | Jun 2012 | US |