Patent Grant
8183815
This application is the US National Stage of International Application No. PCT/EP2006/067337, filed Oct. 10, 2006 and claims the benefit thereof. The International Application claims the benefits of German application No. 10 2005 050 125.7 filed Oct. 18, 2005, both of the applications are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
The invention relates to a method for automatically determining a mass (meff) of a door system that is driven by a motor and has at least one door, a speed change accomplished during an acceleration movement being established, and a force variable influencing the drive force of the motor being summed or integrated during the acceleration movement, and the sum or the integral of the force variable and the speed change (ΔV) being used to determine the mass (meff).
The term door is to be understood equally as a single door leaf, a double door leaf and a rolling door with closing and opening directions in any desired positions.
The invention also relates to a control device for automatically determining a mass of a door system that is driven by a motor and has at least one door.
Such doors are applied, for example, as building doors, doors in trains or as elevator doors. The establishment of the effective elevator door mass and of the kinetic energy linked thereto is of great importance for safety reasons. In particular, there are regulations that limit the kinetic energy of a sliding door in closing movement to a specific Joule value in terms of apparatus.
Methods and apparatuses for automatically establishing door mass are known from EP 108 72 79 B1 and WO 2004/021094 A1. It is disadvantageous of the two methods that in the case, for example, of two-leaf doors with a very small opening width, only half an opening width is available for mass determination for a driving operation. This short distance is not sufficient for determining the mass with a required accuracy of less than 10%.
A further disadvantage is that the mass determination is not possible in an arbitrary operating movement for example during normal opening. For the present, it is necessary to change to a movement for establishing mass.
It is the object of the invention to simplify the generic method for mass determination such that it is possible to establish the mass during any desired movement without renouncing the accuracy of the establishment of the mass.
This object is achieved by virtue of the fact that, in accordance with the invention, in the case of a generic method in which a force variable influencing the drive force of the motor is summed or integrated during the acceleration movement, and the sum or the integral of the force variable and the speed change are used to determine the mass, the summation or integration of the force variable is performed over a number of operating system cycles (Δt) of a control device assigned to the door system.
According to the invention, it is now advantageous during an arbitrary movement, that is to say also during normal operation, to establish the door mass by means of the measured and, computationally, via at least two intervals or operating system cycles, without it happening that the movement properties of the door are influenced. Thus, it is possible to operate virtually with arbitrary movement profiles.
In an advantageous refinement of the invention, a current driving the motor, a motor voltage, in particular an armature voltage, and/or a pulse width modulation signal is/are used as force variable. Since the force variable such as a current driving the motor or a motor voltage, in particular an armature voltage, or else a pulse width modulation signal can be established simply, cost effectively and accurately by measurement, the simple establishment of the motor force variables is very advantageous for the inventive method.
It is expedient that the force variable is varied at the start of or/and during the acceleration movement. To date, it has been necessary to establish the mass via a constant current or a voltage jump, or via a constant motor voltage ramp. The door mass can now be determined with an accuracy of less than 10% by using a virtually arbitrary force variable profile, for example a sinusoidal profile. The accuracy is now essentially by the resolution of the values established such as, for example, the speed, the current or the voltage values.
In a further preferred refinement, a separate learning movement is executed outside the normal operation as acceleration movement. The advantage of learning movements that are possibly carried out at a time interval of approximately 1 year, is that the “aging” of the door system can be detected. For example, the friction in the sliding shoes can have increased owing to continuous operation, and thus the previously established value of an effective mass of the door system no longer corresponds to the present value of an effective mass. The change process is preferably logged in an associated automation system in a log file.
In an expedient and maintenance friendly refinement of the invention, a movement of the normal operation is used as acceleration movement, the mass of the door system being preferably automatically reestablished from time to time, for example once per week, during normal operation. The door mass can also be established during movement in normal operation by means of the inventive method, for example by applying an arbitrary profile for the force variable.
Consequently, it is also possible to take account, for example, of different temperature influences in the course of a day or a year.
In order to overcome static friction, it is expedient that before the acceleration movement the door system is driven at least in a creeping movement, at least a friction current flowing. Once the friction current IR has been established, the effective door mass can be established yet more accurately. The creeping movement is preferably defined by a speed of less than 10 cm/s.
A further enhancement of the accuracy of the establishment of mass is achieved by virtue of the fact that during the acceleration movement the acceleration firstly starts, beginning with the creeping movement, with a positive value from a first instant and then changes to the creeping movement again with a negative acceleration. By way of example, in a learning movement a ramp with a first gradient is applied over a specific time. The door system or the door is thereby accelerated. After this acceleration time, the door system or the door is braked by a second, negative gradient, which can be substantially steeper than the first gradient, until creeping movement is again achieved. This procedure has the particular advantage that even the masses of very light doors can be established within very small opening widths, and the door comes to rest again in good time before stopping at an end point.
It is expedient that a force constant of the motor is used to determine the mass. The force constant is derived from a torque constant of the motor transmitted into a translatory system.
It is expedient that the current to be summed or to be integrated is formed from a difference between a total current, particularly measured during the acceleration movement, and the friction current. It is considered to be advantageous that as an effective mass the determined mass includes components consisting of a translatory mass, a mass of a counterweight and/or a door mass.
It is advantageous for an alternative determination of the mass that as an effective mass the determined mass includes components consisting of a translatory mass, a mass equivalent to the spring force of a spring, and/or a door mass. Thus, it is possible to use this method to determine the mass of two different door systems, the point being that there are door systems that operate with a counterweight, and door systems that operate with a spring force of a spring.
It is, furthermore, expedient that the acceleration movement is achieved by an increase in the total current in particular beyond the friction current. The friction current is preferably measured in a separate movement for the purpose of establishing friction. In the simplest case, the current is increased until the door is set in movement.
It is advantageous for safe operation of the door that a kinetic energy of the door, in particular impact energy, is established by means of the mass. By establishing the impact energy, it is possible to set the door system or the motor force or the motor speed in such a way that the impact energy does not exceed a specific limit and therefore does not cause any injuries, for example in the case of malfunction.
According to the invention, the object is also achieved by the control device mentioned at the beginning for automatically determining a mass of a door system that is driven by a motor and has at least one door, preferably for carrying out the method as claimed in one of the method claims, having a first memory for storing a profile, characterizing an acceleration movement, of a force variable influencing the drive force of the motor, a second memory for storing a program code, and an arithmetic logic unit for establishing mass under programmed control, the memories and the arithmetic logic unit being designed in such a way that mass can be established for different force variable profiles in the first memory in conjunction with an unchanged program code. It is possible in this case for the two memories to be organized as different memory areas in a common memory chip.
An exemplary embodiment for automatically determining a mass of a door system is explained in more detail with the aid of the figures.
The door is closed at position 4, this corresponding to a movement distance S=0 mm. After a run up distance of preferably SA=100 mm, starting from a first instant or measuring point MP1 a total current IG is measured for the movement distance of a motor voltage ramp present for 40 operating system cycles Δt with a gradient of one pulse width modulation increment per operating system cycle Δt. A motor current I is summed for this time duration. The motor current I is composed of the measured total current IG minus a friction current IR, I=IG−IR. The door is completely open at position 5.
In order to establish the friction current IR, measurement is carried out in the open direction 6 starting from the first measuring point MP1 in a separate learning movement in the case of which the motor voltage profile 1 has a continuous linear profile as against the illustration in the figure, that is to say without a ramp. The friction current IR is measured for a further 150 mm every 10 mm starting from a covered run up distance SA=100 mm, and stored, and provided as a mean value for a later calculation to establish the mass.
The calculation represented in formula I:
is executed in order to determine effective mass meff of the door in accordance with the invention.
The inventive method of calculation according to formula I results from the physical basic equation according to formula II and transformation of formula II into a summed representation according to formula III and the use of a motor force constant KΦ according to formulas IV and V.
Ultimately, the value for the speed change ΔV per operating system cycle is established via an incremental encoder on the motor. The incremental encoder provides pulses per time unit that are directly proportional to a current speed V.
The measured motor currents IG and IR and the speed V or the speed change ΔV established via the incremental encoder are inserted into formula I, and the effective door mass meff can be determined.
In order to establish counterweights and/or to determine forces, the respective force is established with the aid of formula IV at the positions of the movement distance S that correspond to the measuring points MP1 to MP4.
If a spring is used in the door system for a counterforce, the greatest force Ff of the spring occurs at the location of the positions or measuring points MP2 and MP3. A door system can be determined with the aid of a spring automatically, preferably solely on the basis of the elected measured values, without being analyzed by a service technician, by means of comparing the forces at the measuring points MP1 and MP4 with MP2 and MP3 in the case of a larger force at the positions MP2 and MP3 than at the positions MP1 and MP4.
For the case in which no spring is detected, a counterweight can be established as follows. The force FMP2 at the position MP2 is composed according to formula VI of the friction force FR and the counterweight force FG. Further additions of physical forces lead to formula IX in which the counterweight force FG is established.
1. FMP2=FR+FG VI.
2. FMP3=−FR+FG VII.
3. FMP3=−FMP2+2·FG VIII.
4. FG=(FMP2+FMP3)/2 IX.
Since as an effective mass the determined mass meff includes components consisting of a translatory mass mlin, a mass mG of the counterweight and a mass equivalent to the spring force FF, or a combination of the two, and a door mass mT, the door mass mT is determined according to formula X.
1. mT=meff−mlin−mG X.
The following table shows measured values of the door determined via the inventive calculation in comparison with the actual measured values of the door. It is shown on the example of a door with an actual mass of 300 kg and a further door with an actual mass of 200 kg that the percentage deviation between the actual mass and the calculated mass is below 10%.
The calculated values result from in each case three measurements in which respectively 78 measured current values per 10 ms are evaluated. In addition, one measurement movement each of the door is carried out at a start from a left-hand side and from a right-hand side. The effective mass component of motor and system or the translatory mass is 10 kg.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 2005 050 125 | Oct 2005 | DE | national |
| 10 2006 043 896 | Sep 2006 | DE | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2006/067337 | 10/12/2006 | WO | 00 | 9/22/2009 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2007/045596 | 4/26/2007 | WO | A |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0 429 835 | Jun 1991 | EP |
| 1 087 279 | Mar 2001 | EP |
| WO 2004021094 | Mar 2004 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20100013425 A1 | Jan 2010 | US |
