This application claims priority to PCT International Application No. PCT/EP09/07507, filed Oct. 20, 2009, which is incorporated herein by reference.
1. Technical Field
The present invention relates to a method and a conveyor device for the return of empties, especially of bottles and cans.
2. Background
Such methods and conveyor devices as the ones described here are used in automatic systems for the return of empties. Disposable containers and reusable containers in the form of bottles and cans are returned with the aid of these automatic systems. A distinction is made here between individual draw-in systems and bulk draw-in systems.
An example of a system for the return of empties with an individual draw-in system can be found in WO 02/12095 A1. In such automatic systems, the containers are manually input, one after the other, adjacent to each other and then conducted in a row, still adjacent to each other, by a conveyor device. The conveyor device conducts the containers past a detection unit that checks the containers for form, nature, and integrity, as well as for barcodes or special figures.
Automatic systems for the return of empties with a bulk draw-in system are described in DE 10 2005 025 965 A1, DE 10 2004 010 133 A1, and DE 103 35 188 A1. In these automatic systems, empties to be returned are not input individually, i.e., item by item, but rather in a mass (bulk), i.e., as loose material. The mass of empties is placed in the input space, and then the individual empties are transported out of the input space by the conveyor device. In the automatic systems of the prior art, a serial individualization of the empties takes place, and the containers are removed from the input space as in the individual draw-in system. That is, the conveyor device transports the containers, one after the other, past a detection unit that detects the empties individually.
The bulk draw-in systems previously described above have the advantage that the input of the empties into the system takes place rapidly and without problems for a user. There is, however, the disadvantage that the throughput through the automatic system requires too much time on account of the serial individualization of the empties in spite of high individual conveyor speeds in some instances, so that a customer must wait a relatively long time for the printout of a deposit slip.
The present invention advantageously provides a method and a conveyor device for the return of empties, in particular of bottles and cans, with an elevated throughput.
A method is disclosed to solve this problem, in which the empties are moved out of an input space by a conveyor device rotating the containers about their longitudinal axis past a detection unit. Thus, the empties are moved out of the input space in a parallelized manner and supplied to the detection unit in a field array.
A system is also disclosed to solve this problem, the system including a conveyor device which moves empties out of an input space, rotates the containers about their longitudinal axes past a detection unit. The conveyor device moves the empties out of the input space in a parallelized manner and supplies the containers to the detection unit in a field array. The conveyor device, in certain embodiments, includes several cams arranged transversely to the direction of transport. The cams are also constructed so that the empties receive a rotary impulse, causing the empties to rotate at least in the detection field of the detection unit.
Therefore, the removal of the empties from the input space takes place in a parallelized manner so that the empties are supplied to the detection unit in a field array. The term “field array” is intended to signify that the empties, viewed on the conveyor device in the direction of transport, are arranged not only in front of and behind one another, but also side by side at the same time. In order to realize this method of procedure, the cams of the conveyor device are constructed to be so wide that they can receive at least two items of empties adjacent to one another, whereby the empties receive a rotary impulse at least in the detection field of the detection unit in each transport plane formed by the cams so that the empties rotate about their longitudinal axis with a simultaneous translatory transport. The rotary movement about the longitudinal axis is required, as in the individual draw-in system, in order to be able to detect marks, etc. present on the jacket surface of the empties by the detection unit. Based on these measures, the throughput of the empties through an automatic return system is significantly elevated.
In a first advantageous embodiment of the invention the conveyor device is provided with a contact surface for the empties. Drives, especially chain drives, run around this contact surface, on which rollers, arranged at a distance from each other, are rotatably supported and function as cams for the empties. The rotary drive of the empties lying on the rollers can be achieved in a simple manner by frictional contact of the rollers with the contact surface. That is, rollers are moved translatorily relative to the contact surface and rotate as a result, transmitting a rotary impulse onto the empties. A rotary drive of the rollers by a positive locking between rollers and support is also conceivable in that the support comprises toothed areas on both sides, with which gear combs on the rollers may mesh in such a manner that they rotate in unison.
In another embodiment of the invention the rollers project beyond the contact surface on both sides and rest on rails in these projecting areas for the rotary drive under frictional contact or positive locking. The rails are arranged, relative to the contact surface, on the opposite side of the chain drive. As a result, the direction of rotation of the rollers, and therefore also of the empties, is inverted in comparison to the previously described embodiment, which advantageously results in a shortening of the height of the detection field of the detection unit. A further shortening of the height of the detection field of the detection unit can be realized in this embodiment in that the diameter of the rollers (or in a positive locking, of the gears) in the two projecting areas is smaller than in the cam area, whereby the term cam area denotes the area of the rollers on which area the empties lie. This measure significantly raises the circumferential speed of the empties.
In contrast to the embodiment described above as the first advantageous embodiment, a shortening of the detection field of the detection unit can be achieved when the rollers project on both sides beyond the contact surface and rest on rails in these projecting areas. The rails provide the rotary drive using either frictional contact or positive locking. The rails are arranged, relative to the chain drives, on the side of the contact surface, and the diameter of the rollers (or in the case of positive locking, of the gears) is smaller in the projecting areas than in the cam area of the empties. In this embodiment, the empties have the same direction of rotation as in the first embodiment, but have a greater circumferential speed.
It proved to be advantageous if the rollers have alternating sections with greater and lesser diameters, whereby the empties rest on sections with a greater diameter. The conveying of the empties then has fewer problems. In particular, the empties are less likely to get wedged between the rollers and the contact surface with this shape of the rollers.
In another embodiment, the rotary drive comprises drive rollers or drive belts make up part of the contact surface for the empties. In this manner, the cams can be constructed, for example, as strips.
In a further embodiment, the conveyor device is constructed as a steep conveyor. In certain embodiments, the conveyor has an angle of incidence, α, of 60° to 85°. On the one hand, this reduces the structural depth of a return automatic. On the other hand, it largely prevents empties from lying on top of each other on one cam because the sharp angle causes excess empties to fall back into the input space.
The invention is explained in detail in the following using exemplary embodiments. Wherever convenient, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts. The associated drawing schematically show:
The angle of incidence of α of the steep conveyor can be maximally 90°. In this case rollers 4 would have to have a diameter that is greater than the greatest diameter of the empties 10 to be transported.
A funnel-shaped input space 8, open at the top, is arranged at the lower end of steep conveyor 1. The bottom 9 of input space 8 is inclined downward toward steep conveyor 1. Empties 10, generally in the form of cans and bottles, may be input into input space 8 by being poured out, e.g., as loose material. As a result of the incline of bottom 9, a driving force is present, i.e., gravity, that allows empties 10 to roll and/or slide to steep conveyor 1. Rollers 4 of steep conveyor 1 run through input space 8, and as a result, empties 10 are carried into the system, lying on sections 6 with a greater diameter of rollers 4. Rollers 4 are wide enough to accommodate at least two items of empties on one roller 4, as is apparent from
Steep conveyor 1 transports the empties 10 upward, out of input space 8. The direction of transport is represented in
Steep conveyor 1 guides empties 10 past a camera 14 of a detection unit, as is shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2008 052 330 | Oct 2008 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2009/007507 | 10/20/2009 | WO | 00 | 7/11/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/046085 | 4/29/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2702112 | Hait | Feb 1955 | A |
3282394 | Neal et al. | Nov 1966 | A |
3300021 | Holmes | Jan 1967 | A |
3331486 | Towry | Jul 1967 | A |
3580380 | Phillips | May 1971 | A |
3598222 | Mencacci | Aug 1971 | A |
3835985 | Johnson | Sep 1974 | A |
4285426 | Cahill | Aug 1981 | A |
4928808 | Marti | May 1990 | A |
5052543 | Hagan | Oct 1991 | A |
5078258 | van der Schoot | Jan 1992 | A |
6678578 | Holmen et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6691854 | De Greef | Feb 2004 | B1 |
8729455 | Kulki et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8813938 | Handschick | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8910567 | Moch et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
20070158163 | Kritzinger et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20110259714 | Handschick et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120017782 | Moch et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120118700 | Handschick | May 2012 | A1 |
20120260811 | Schulenberg et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20130248716 | Kulcke | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130299304 | Handschick | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140048391 | Beyer | Feb 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
948142 | May 1974 | CA |
2254791 | May 1974 | DE |
0 082 735 | Jun 1983 | EP |
0 290 877 | Nov 1988 | EP |
1 953 674 | Aug 2008 | EP |
2105891 | Sep 2009 | EP |
981 328 | May 1961 | GB |
WO 0063853 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 2005069233 | Jul 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report dated Jan. 27, 2010 for International Application No. PCT/EP2009/007507. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110259714 A1 | Oct 2011 | US |