This is the United States national phase of International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2013/075656, filed Dec. 5, 2013, which claims the priority benefit of German Application No. 10 2012 223 276.1, filed Dec. 14, 2012. The entire contents of each of the foregoing is hereby incorporated by reference.
The present disclosure relates to a method for centerless cylindrical grinding of workpieces having a rotationally symmetrical contour, and to a centerless cylindrical grinding machine.
In the best-known embodiment of cylindrical grinding machines for centerless cylindrical grinding, the rotationally symmetrical workpiece is located between a rotating regulating disk and a rotating grinding disk, and is additionally supported on the so-called support ruler (for example, see Dubbel, Taschenbuch für den Maschinenbau, 15th ed. 1983, p. 1003, FIG. 50 g, h). The workpiece is therein driven to rotate by the regulating disk, and ground by the grinding disk. The regulating disk and grinding disk are mounted onto drive units (in terms of the grinding disk, the drive unit is known as a grinding headstock or grinding spindle unit) in the usual manner, wherein the circumferential speed of the regulating disk must be lower than that of the grinding disk. The difference in the rotational speeds—so-called slippage—brings about the grinding action. The terms “grinding disk” and “regulating disk” as used in this application refer to working concepts in terms of the function thereof in the centerless cylindrical grinding, but do not imply any limitation with respect to the configuration thereof in the axial extension. These disks thus may be, for example, cylindrically continuous, stepped, or conic in shape, and may also comprise a plurality of sections of different contours. The regulating disk and the grinding disk may be composed of individual section parts in the axial direction, the individual section parts being directly adjacent to one another or separated by intervening gaps.
Those skilled in the art of tool machines have long known that with centerless cylindrical grinding of machine components in mass production in which grinding must be done at high rotational speeds of the regulating and grinding disks, the grinding results no longer meet the highest demands, nor do the dimensional accuracy, the roundness, or the surface quality. The regulating disk has been recognized as one of the possible sources of error. Depending on the quality of the configuration thereof and the mounting thereof in the associated drive unit, this may itself have a run-out error that has harmful effects on the grinding results. Added to this is the fact that the regulating disk needs to be dressed from time to time, whereby further inaccuracies can arise.
The aforementioned patent document DD 55 918 A thus proposes that in centerless cylindrical grinding of disk-shaped workpieces having very small dimensions, the regulating disk should no longer be driven to rotate. The support ruler is also omitted therein. Instead, a support device is provided, which is referred to as a “workpiece holder” and is composed of two rows of ball bearings that are mounted slightly rotatably in bearing blocks on two parallel axes. To a certain extent, the driven regulating disk and the support ruler are thereby replaced by two rows of non-driven regulating disks. The grinding disk and the two rows of ball bearings form a grinding gap in which the workpieces are located and rest on two opposing ball bearings. During grinding, the workpieces are rotated by the traction with the grinding disk, wherein the support of the workpieces on the ball bearings produces little friction against the grinding disk. The workpieces obtain the rotation required for the grinding process exclusively due to frictional entrainment by the grinding disk.
The embodiment according to DD 55 918 A does indeed have the advantage of being structurally somewhat simpler, because the motor driving of the regulating disk is eliminated. A major cause of inaccurate grinding results remains, however, or is even increased, because the support of the workpiece on the two rows of rotating bodies constitutes an unavoidable source of error. The roundness of the bearing outer rings and the accuracy of the mounting thereof onto the balls and the bearing inner rings are too low and uneven in relation to the accuracy that is required by the centerless cylindrical grinding according to the application.
Another proposal for centerless cylindrical grinding without a regulating disk is found in patent document DE 43 30 800 A1. That proposal is also based on the finding that the regulating disk that contacts the workpiece is rotatably mounted and therefore is fundamentally not free of run-out errors. The remedy should be for a single, fixed prism to be provided as a support device for the cylindrical workpieces, the prism serving as a workpiece holder, and for a circulating endless drive belt to serve as a rotational drive for the workpiece. Furthermore, a finger loaded by a spring is provided, the finger pushing the workpiece into the recess of the prism. A disadvantage in the configuration according to DE 43 30 800 A1 is that the arrangement of a drive belt again requires an increased structural complexity with an additional driving device, as compared to the ball bearings according to DD 55 918 A. Because of the required longitudinal extension of the drive belt, the grinding gap that is given by the prism is also less accessible. It is moreover impossible to exclude the concern that the flexible drive belt, which runs over rollers, will cause irregularities in the rotational movement of the workpiece, introducing rhythmic disturbances or vibrations into the grinding process, which have an adverse effect on the grinding result.
Patent document DE 341 606 A discloses a workpiece guidance on machines for grinding cylindrical or conical bodies by means of a triplet of cooperating guide rails for centerless cylindrical grinding. Two of the guide rails form a wedge space that opens to the outside from the grinding disk, the workpiece that needs to be ground being arranged in the wedge space. A back rail arranged on the opening side of the wedge space is movable in the direction of the two other rails, i.e., in the direction of the grinding disk, so that the workpiece is pressed against the two guide rails in the direction against the grinding disk under the action of a continuously acting pressure.
Patent document DE 11 79 826 A describes a device for centerless cylindrical grinding which comprises an arrangement of a grinding disk, a regulating disk, and a support rail, in a conventional manner. The support rail can be formed as a prism support that is arranged so as to be pivotable, i.e., movable about a free fulcrum. There, both the grinding disk and the regulating disk are provided with a drive. In order to avoid waviness in the surface of the workpiece needing to be ground, the free tilting of the workpiece support serves to always distribute the support points for the workpiece so as to compensate for the forward movement, caused by a wave crest, of the workpiece through the simultaneous return due to the wave troughs on the support surfaces.
The invention addresses the problem of providing a method and device of the first aforementioned type corresponding to DD 55 918 A, with which the rotationally symmetrical parts can be ground with greater dimensional and geometric accuracy, even at high operating speeds of operational mass production, the required cylindrical grinding machine nevertheless being fundamentally simple in design, and thus very cost-effective, and reliably working over longer periods of time with consistent accuracy.
The problem is solved, concerning the method, with the totality of the features of claim 1, and concerning the cylindrical grinding machine, with the totality of the features of claim 3.
The advantage of the disclosure, as compared to DD 55 918 A, is that beyond the rotation for rotating the driven grinding disk, no other rotation-based drive or support parts based are required. The two non-rotating contact surfaces, which are formed so as to be flat in the associated cylindrical grinding machine, impart in any event a more accurate support than the ball bearings in the prior art. In comparison to DE 43 30 800 A1, the invention has an advantage in that a separate drive device for the rotation of the workpiece is not necessary. According to the disclosure method, a single rotational drive for the grinding disk is needed, which at the same time also moves the workpiece to rotate. Harmful effects from the additional drive device in the form of a circulating drive belt can be avoided in any event.
In an advantageous embodiment the ratio of the rotational speeds of the grinding disk and the workpiece can be continuously monitored and regulated to a defined optimal ratio. The application force of the grinding disk and the braking force that is exerted by the support device can be adjusted so as to result in a defined ratio of the rotational speeds of the workpiece and the grinding disk, which leads to optimum grinding results.
With respect to the centerless cylindrical grinding machine, the problem addressed by the invention is solved in that the support device comprises at least one first flat contact surface and one second flat contact surface, which both are operationally immobile in the circumferential direction of the workpiece, extend at a distance from one another along the workpiece, and encompass the workpiece under sliding contact. Flat contact surfaces, which correspond to the known support ruler, are a proven means of supporting the rotating workpiece. The workpiece is held by these flat contact surfaces with the greatest possibility accuracy in the predetermined position thereof that is optimal for the grinding process. All run-out errors that result from a rotating support are thereby eliminated. The support surfaces are optimally set to the circumferential direction of the workpiece and the diameter thereof, this adjustment being operationally inalterable in this respect.
However, different settings of the first flat contact surface and the second flat contact surface need to be made in accordance with the diameter of the workpiece and the desired grinding process. An appropriate setting can be easily made before the grinding process by adjusting or replacing the contact surfaces. During the grinding process itself, however, the first flat contact surface and the second flat contact surface remain for the most part totally operationally immobile.
In certain grinding processes, e.g., plunge grinding, the contact surfaces must sometimes even be adjusted during the grinding process, because they need to be constantly adapted to the decreasing diameter of the workpiece 1 at the grinding point. According to another advantageous embodiment, the first contact surface and the second contact surface may be configured so as to be operationally controllably movable.
Another advantageous embodiment may be relevant on its own or in conjunction with the other advantageous embodiments. It relates to the fact that the first contact surface is located on a support plate that is found beneath the workpiece, the support plate being formed according to the manner of the conventional support ruler. The second contact surface may be located on a particular support rail that is arranged opposite to the grinding disk. The support plate and support rail enable stable mounting of the two contact surfaces, so that the required grinding accuracy remains reliable for a long time. In this manner, the application force exerted on the grinding disk pushes the workpiece in an optimal contact against the first and second support surface.
The two contact surfaces constitute stable and consistent contact surfaces which also exert a substantially constant braking force on the rotation of the workpiece in conjunction with a constant application force of the grinding disk. It is, however, also possible to adjust this braking force precisely to a certain value that is selected for a certain grinding process. To this end, a brake comprising a braking body is arranged on the support device, the braking body acting on the workpiece via an adjustment device with an adjustable braking force.
According to another embodiment, the brake may be designed so that the braking body forms another support body having a third contact surface.
With regard to the arrangement of this third contact surface, this faces the first contact surface and acts on the workpiece from above.
Another embodiment of the cylindrical grinding machine according to the disclosure is relevant on its own, but may also be performed in conjunction with the other previously identified embodiments. Then, the first contact surface and the second contact surface are combined into a shared support body that forms a prism opposing the grinding disk and encompasses the workpiece. Such a prism may be formed so as to be solid and very stable, whereby a more secure, low-wear, and reliable support of the workpiece at the desired position is ensured. Such a solid prism may also be mounted as a whole and, where appropriate, change sides from a working position thereof to a maintenance position, if it is necessary. The cross-section of the prism then may have the form of an angle or the form of a trapezoid. What is critical, in any case, is that oblique contact surfaces that encompass the workpiece are formed.
Finally, it may be provided that the cylindrical grinding machine has a device for measuring the rotational speed, through which the workpiece rotational speed is constantly monitored. In an assessment and regulation arrangement, the optimal balance between the grinding disk rotational speed, the application force of the grinding disk, and the braking force of the braking body can thus be constantly maintained. In this manner, not only is the support device of the cylindrical grinding machine according to the invention furnished for an optimal grinding result, but also certain optimal operating conditions can be sustained even with greater constancy in the desired manner.
The invention shall be made more readily apparent through the following embodiments depicted in the accompanying drawings. The drawings illustrate the following:
Below the grinding disk 3 is a support plate 6, which is formed as a common support ruler. The upwardly facing flat surface thereof is the first contact surface 7 of the support device configured according to the invention. The first contact surface 7 is, as usual, inclined downward at an angle λ, originating from the side thereof facing the grinding disk 3. To adapt to the respective grinding process needing to be addressed, the first contact surface 7 can be adjusted in height. In addition to the setting “below center” depicted in
A support rail 8 on which the second flat contact surface 9 is located is arranged opposite the grinding disk 3 with a certain angular offset. The angular offset corresponds approximately to the angle A. In
During operation of the cylindrical grinding machine depicted in partial cross-section in
In the embodiment according to
As shown in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2012 223 276.1 | Dec 2012 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2013/075656 | 12/5/2013 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2014/090678 | 6/19/2014 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
712815 | Landis | Nov 1902 | A |
1364006 | Swanson | Dec 1920 | A |
1449507 | Fors | Mar 1923 | A |
1577353 | Einstein | Mar 1926 | A |
1663991 | Nenninger | Mar 1928 | A |
1709671 | Kearns | Apr 1929 | A |
RE17311 | Swanson | May 1929 | E |
RE117311 | Swanson | May 1929 | |
2099161 | De Leeuw | Nov 1937 | A |
2102518 | Johnson | Dec 1937 | A |
2261903 | La Fleur | Nov 1941 | A |
2286620 | Hollengreen | Jun 1942 | A |
2638719 | Balsiger | May 1953 | A |
2743555 | Irvine | May 1956 | A |
3330074 | Stuckey | Jul 1967 | A |
3391500 | Messier | Jul 1968 | A |
3425168 | Porath | Feb 1969 | A |
3427755 | Barney | Feb 1969 | A |
3854252 | Lindsay | Dec 1974 | A |
3859755 | Schaller | Jan 1975 | A |
3977129 | Bottomley | Aug 1976 | A |
4181077 | Dalton | Jan 1980 | A |
4276723 | Fournier | Jul 1981 | A |
4324073 | Belthle | Apr 1982 | A |
4507896 | Smith | Apr 1985 | A |
4663892 | Smith | May 1987 | A |
5048235 | Smith | Sep 1991 | A |
5177901 | Smith | Jan 1993 | A |
5285599 | Lessway | Feb 1994 | A |
5443411 | Rouyer | Aug 1995 | A |
6148248 | Sun | Nov 2000 | A |
6273785 | Mulroy | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6287183 | Zhang | Sep 2001 | B1 |
7008294 | Junker | Mar 2006 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
55918 | Sep 1890 | DE |
341606 | Oct 1921 | DE |
1009525 | May 1957 | DE |
1179826 | Oct 1964 | DE |
4330800 | Feb 1994 | DE |
0211539 | Feb 1987 | EP |
H09323244 | Jun 1996 | JP |
159739 | Nov 1963 | SU |
814667 | Mar 1981 | SU |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report for application No. PCT/EP2013/075656, dated Feb. 17, 2014. |
Examination report for German application 10 2012 223 276.1, dated Sep. 16, 2013. |
Dubbel, Taschenbuch filr den Maschinebau, 15th ed., 1983, p. 1003, Figs. 50g, h. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150298275 A1 | Oct 2015 | US |