This invention relates, generally, to digital subscriber line modems and, more particularly, to the active impedance networks in digital subscriber line modems.
A digital subscriber line (DSL) is a technology for bringing high-bandwidth information to homes and small businesses over ordinary copper telephone lines traditionally used for voice communication through the Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN). Digital data is transported across the PSTN by converting the data into an analog signal that is transmitted by varying, or modulating, the frequency, phase, amplitude or other characteristic of a carrier signal. The modulation is performed by a DSL modem attached to a standard telephone line referred to as a “local loop”. When analog signals are received from other DSL modems in the PSTN, the receiving DSL modem performs an opposite function by demodulating the received analog signal to convert it back into digital data. DSL modems are typically installed in pairs, with one of the DSL modems installed in a customer's premises and the other in the telephone company's central office servicing that customer's premises. The pair of DSL modems is connected to opposite ends of the same twisted pair telephone line comprising the local loop. xDSL refers to different variations of DSL and ADSL (asymmetric DSL), G.Lite DSL (ITU-T standard G-002.2), HADSL (high bit-rate DSL) and RADSL (rate adaptive DSL).
To protect the circuitry and prevent current leakage between the transmit ports and the receive ports, a hybrid circuit is used. The hybrid circuit allows the transmitted signal to be conveyed to the transmission line without leaking into the receive port and likewise allows the received signal to be conveyed from the transmission line to the receive port without leaking into the transmit port.
xDSL modems require electrical power to operate. In an effort to reduce the amount of electrical power consumed by xDSL modems, a technique called “active impedance” is sometimes employed. This technique has some disadvantages, including signal attenuation introduced in the receiver path. This signal attenuation is proportional to the level of active impedance generated. Because of the signal attenuation, the signal to noise ratio of the received signal degrades. While active impedance improves power consumption by a ratio of 1.8:1, it increases losses in the receiver path by 12˜15 dB. This results in a decrease in the maximum loop reach of the xDSL modem; i.e., the maximum loop is the distance between the modems in the central office and the customer's premises.
Several solutions have been tried in an effort to solve this drawback. One solution is to eliminate the active impedance generation, but this will increase the power consumption of the xDSL modem. Another solution is to increase the gain of the receiver path, but this does not affect the signal to noise ratio. Yet another solution is to improve the noise characteristic of the receiver, but this increases the complexity, cost and power consumption of the modem.
Accordingly, a need exists for a method and design that allows an xDSL modem to employ active impedance generation without affecting the signal to noise ratio and thereby degrading the effective reach of the signal.
The present invention is a method and design to satisfy the aforementioned need. Accordingly, the present invention is a method and design using additional transformer windings in a hybrid circuit of the xDSL modem to provide significant gain in the receiver path increasing its signal to noise ratio without increasing its power consumption.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate the scope of the present invention and realize additional aspects thereof after reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments in association with the accompanying drawing figures.
The accompanying drawing figures incorporated in and forming a part of this specification illustrate several aspects of the invention, and together with the description serve to explain the principles of the invention.
The present invention is directed to compensating for the loss of a received signal when the xDSL modem uses an active impedance. For a full explanation of what an active impedance is and how it is incurred, reference is made to the priority document of the present invention, namely U.S. provisional patent application 60/271,604 filed 26 Feb. 2001 and incorporated by reference. For further edification on the subject of active impedance, the interested reader is directed to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/276,143 filed 25 Mar. 1999, entitled “HIGH EFFICIENCY LINE DRIVER WITH ACTIVE IMPEDANCE MATCHING” which is herein incorporated by reference in its entirety. In short, by reducing the resistance of the impedance in the transmission circuitry to reduce power consumption, losses are introduced into the receive path. For the sake of notational clarity, if a non-active impedance element is described as R0, an active impedance is denoted R0/m, where m is typically between four and five. The present invention provides a technique by which this loss may be compensated for, without degrading the signal to noise ratio.
An xDSL modem front end 10 in conjunction with a transmission line 12 is illustrated in
The transmission line 12 is a conventional transmission line with a line impedance (ZL) 26 and a line voltage source (VL) 28 that creates a voltage on the transmission line 12. This voltage, labeled VRX, is the voltage that conveys the signal to be received to the modem front end 10. In most embodiments, the line impedance 26 will be a real value, but in some embodiments it may be complex at certain frequencies. The present invention covers both situations.
The transmit path 20 comprises an active impedance of a first resistor (R0/m) 30 and a virtual resistor (R0*(m−1)/m) 32 located within a transmit power amplifier (PA) 34. The active impedance is designed to match the line impedance 26 and thus may be real only, complex only, or a combination of real and complex as needed or desired. Thus, it should be appreciated that the resistors identified in the specification are all broadly impedances. Further, the virtual resistor 32 is a synthesized or simulated resistor as explained in the previously incorporated '143 application.
The transmit power amplifier 34 receives a signal from a transmit port 35. The transmit path 20 further comprises a second resistor 36 and a line balancing impedance 38. The inclusion of these elements is well understood. Second resistor 36 is a multiple K times larger than the first resistor 30, while the line balancing impedance 38 is the same multiple K larger than the line impedance 26. In an exemplary embodiment, K is approximately 10.
A second transformer 40 couples a signal from the transmit path 20 to the receive path 24 by conveying a signal in a first coil 42 to a second coil 44. The first coil 42 to the second coil 44 turn ratio may be expressed as 1:α. Further, the first coil 42 may have an inductance of K times the inductance of the first and second coils 16, 18 of the first transformer 14.
As illustrated, the third coil 22 of the first transformer 14 and the second coil 44 of the second transformer 40 may be arranged in series, each having a voltage drop thereacross (labeled V1 and V2). The received signal (VREC) received at the receive (RX) port 46 may be calculated as the difference of V1 and V2. V1 is known to be the voltage at node C, namely VC, multiplied by α. V2 is known to be the voltage at node A, namely VA multiplied by α.
If the incoming signal to be received has a voltage of VRX, then the voltage at VA is VRX by virtue of the 1:1 ratio of the coils 16, 18. Current will then flow through the first resistor 30 into node B. From node B, the current has two paths, one into the PA 34 and the virtual resistor 32 and the other into the second resistor 36. Because K is approximately ten, the current flowing into second resistor 36 is negligible. The PA 34 can sink the current as needed or desired. Thus, the voltage at node B is a divider made by the virtual resistor 32 and the first resistor 30. Thus, VB=VA(m−1)/m.
The first coil 42 of the transformer 40 has a very high impedance, such that no current flows thereinto. Thus, the voltage at node C is a divider between second resistor 36 and the line balancing impedance 38. Therefore, the voltage at node C is shown as follows when the proper substitutions are made:
Thus, the voltage at node C can be expressed as a function of the voltage in node A, namely,
When the proper substitutions are made, VREC can be determined as a function of VRX.
Thus, the use of the third coil 22, with a number of windings greater than the number of windings in first and second coils 16, 18 respectively, allows gain to be achieved while keeping the hybrid function. This method provides for gain of a in the receive path 24, thus improving the signal to noise ratio by 20logα. In an exemplary embodiment, a is approximately 2–3, but this adequately compensates for the loss introduced by the active impedance, namely the 2/(m+1) term. In an exemplary embodiment, m=4 and α=2.5, which results in a net of no loss in the received signal. This also provides for the advantage wherein there is no active stage and the possibility of either a single-ended or differential-ended signal at the RX port 46.
Those skilled in the art will recognize improvements and modifications to the preferred embodiments of the present invention. For example, many transistor technologies and types may benefit from the present invention. All such improvements and modifications are considered within the scope of the concepts disclosed herein and the claims that follow.
The present invention claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/271,604 filed 26 Feb. 2001, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3764753 | Wisotzky | Oct 1973 | A |
3789315 | Beurrier | Jan 1974 | A |
5210519 | Moore | May 1993 | A |
5301208 | Rhodes | Apr 1994 | A |
5544047 | Appel | Aug 1996 | A |
6104707 | Abraham | Aug 2000 | A |
6323686 | Bisson et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6459739 | Vitenberg | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6580751 | Gardner et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6760434 | Rezvani et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6804349 | Prat et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
20020121930 | Gorcea | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030085732 | Hernandez-Marti | May 2003 | A1 |
20040064275 | Rakshani et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60271604 | Feb 2001 | US |