The present invention relates to a method and a device for assisting in the piloting of an aircraft, in particular an airplane, in a flight of the aircraft along a flight path comprising a plurality of successive rectilinear segments. Each of said rectilinear segments presents a particular constant gradient, and the gradients are different from one (rectilinear) segment to another.
The present invention applies more particularly, but not exclusively, to:
The main object of the present invention is to enable the pilot of the aircraft to anticipate the next gradient (or the next rectilinear segment) to be flown, and this whether flying automatically or manually.
In the case of the approach to a landing strip, automatic aircraft guidance systems are used to bring the latter almost to the landing strip, whatever the visibility conditions, provided that the certification level of the aircraft and of an onboard landing aid system, and the level of qualification of the crew, permit it. This is normally possible for gradients relative to a usual instrument landing system (ILS) which are generally of the order of 3′.
However, in the case of operations requiring a steep-gradient approach, such an automatic landing is much more difficult. The aircraft is then guided in automatic flight mode to a certain decision height above the strip, the height below which the pilot must see the landing strip (otherwise a go-around must be performed). He then performs the landing manually in visual mode, or he monitors an automatic landing, being ready at all times to take over the flight controls to continue in manual flight mode if that proves necessary.
Furthermore, a steep-gradient approach can make it necessary to use airbrakes and/or spoilers, which increase the approach speed. In such a situation, the aircraft must decelerate between the steep-gradient segment and the threshold of the strip. In practice, the greater the speed is when the wheels touch down, the greater is the length needed to perform the landing. Now, the length of a strip that can be used for the landing is predetermined and limited. In the case of manual piloting, the pilot must therefore, in such a situation, have the aircraft decelerate by successive breaks of the gradient, while progressively retracting the airbrakes and/or the spoilers manually. These breaks of gradient constitute a succession of rectilinear segments, each time presenting a constant pitch-down gradient, gradients that progressively decrease until the landing, that is, until a final gradient normally of the order of 3′. It is therefore necessary, in such a situation, to provide the pilot with the appropriate information enabling him to correctly perform this difficult maneuver.
Moreover, in a flight at low altitude along a flight path consisting of a succession of rectilinear segments with constant pitch-down or pull-up gradients, in particular when the flight is performed by following a flight director system, the pilot needs to anticipate the various changes of gradient, in order to follow the flight path as effectively as possible, and therefore to keep a sufficient safety margin relative to the ground. In such a situation, there is also an interest in being able to provide the pilot with appropriate information, enabling him to follow the path as effectively as possible.
The present invention relates to a method for assisting in the piloting of an aircraft in a flight along a flight path comprising a plurality of successive rectilinear segments, which makes it possible to provide the pilot of the aircraft with the information needed to pilot said aircraft in said flight.
To this end, according to the invention, said method, whereby there is presented, on a display screen of a head-up display device, superimposed on the environment seen at the front of the aircraft and in conformal projection, a gradient scale and, on this gradient scale, a gradient symbol illustrating the current gradient of the aircraft, is noteworthy in that the following series of successive steps is carried out automatically and repetitively:
Thus, with the invention, the pilot of the aircraft is provided with the differences in gradient which give him an indication as to the respective gradients of the next rectilinear segments along which the aircraft must fly.
Furthermore, according to the invention, the corresponding presentation of characteristic signs is performed on a head-up display device, which avoids the pilot having to lower his gaze in the cockpit and therefore facilitates the piloting of the aircraft.
In the context of the present invention, the expression “conformal projection” relating to the head-up display device means that the angular representation of a particular gradient actually corresponds to the gradient displayed on the gradient scale, that is, that the point of the ground that such a gradient indicates actually corresponds to the point on the ground that the aircraft would reach if it were to follow this gradient.
Advantageously, in the step a), said gradients are determined at least using a performance model, which makes it possible in particular to take into account the possibilities of deceleration of the aircraft (in approach) or of descent or climb (in flight at low altitude).
Furthermore, advantageously, there is determined, automatically and repetitively, a difference in gradient between an auxiliary gradient corresponding to the gradient on which the aircraft is relative to the next change of gradient and a set-point gradient corresponding to the gradient of the rectilinear segment along which the aircraft should fly (at the current instant), and this difference in gradient is taken into account for determining said characteristic angles. This makes it possible to take account of the fact that the aircraft does not necessarily fly along a gradient which is exactly equal to the set-point gradient along which it should fly.
Moreover, advantageously, there is determined, automatically and repetitively, information on the distance (real distance, or information expressed in flight time) between the current position of the aircraft and the position of the next change of gradient, and, in the step c), there is presented, on said display screen, a particular indication means indicating this information. This enables the pilot to anticipate the next change of gradient (that is, the next change of rectilinear segment).
Moreover, to facilitate the piloting of the aircraft, there is determined, automatically and repetitively, a set-point gradient of the aircraft (along which said aircraft should fly), and, in the step c), there is presented, on said display screen, an auxiliary symbol which is positioned on said gradient scale at said set-point gradient. Consequently, in manual mode, it is sufficient for the pilot to pilot the aircraft in such a way as to bring said gradient symbol (illustrating the current gradient of the aircraft) to said auxiliary symbol to achieve a piloting compliant with the flight set-points.
In a first embodiment, said flight path is a steep-gradient approach path with a view to landing on a landing strip, and said rectilinear segments represent all the successive segments of the flight path, starting from a predetermined height, and this to said landing strip. Preferably, in this case, said change information corresponds respectively to the heights relative to the ground at which the different changes of gradient (or changes of rectilinear segment) must be made.
In a preferred implementation, for a flight path comprising two successive rectilinear segments SA and SB of respective lengths aA and aB and respective gradients θA and θB and change of gradient heights hA, hB and hC, there is determined, in the step b), the characteristic angle α (which represents the gradient angle by which the rectilinear segment SB is seen from the aircraft located at the height hA at the start of the rectilinear segment SA) from the following expression:
aB2=aA2+aC2−2aAaCcosa
which, itself, is obtained from the following expressions:
Moreover, in a second embodiment, said flight path is a low-altitude flight path, and said rectilinear segments are all the successive segments of said flight path, which are located in front of the aircraft, and this to a particular distance relative to the current position of the aircraft. This particular distance can correspond to the distance traveled by the aircraft at the current speed for a predetermined flight time, for example for one minute of flight.
The present invention also relates to a device for assisting in the piloting of an aircraft in a flight along a flight path comprising a plurality of successive rectilinear segments, each of said rectilinear segments presenting a particular constant gradient and the gradients being different from one segment to another.
According to the invention, said device of the type comprising:
The figures of the appended drawing will clearly show how the invention can be implemented. In these figures, identical references designate similar elements.
The device 1 according to the invention and diagrammatically represented in
In a known way, said device 1 is on board the aircraft A and comprises:
In a first possible application represented in
Furthermore, in another application represented in
Furthermore, it is known that such a steep-gradient approach can require the use of airbrakes and/or spoilers, which increases the approach speed. In such a situation, the aircraft A must decelerate between the steep-gradient segment S4 and the threshold of the strip 10. In practice, the greater the speed is when the wheels touch down, the greater is the length required to perform the landing. Now, the length of a strip 10 that can be used for the landing is predetermined and limited. In a manual piloting case, the pilot must therefore, in such a situation, have the aircraft A decelerate by successive breaks of the gradient, while progressively retracting the airbrakes and/or the spoilers manually. These breaks of gradient form the succession of rectilinear segments S1 to S4 of
In the description below of the invention, the device 1 is applied more particularly to a steep-gradient approach, as is represented in
According to the invention, in order in particular to provide the pilot of the aircraft A with information enabling him to anticipate the abovementioned changes of gradient:
In one particular embodiment, said head-up-type display screen 7 can be implemented in the form of a primary flight display (PFD) type screen and can in addition, in a usual way, present in particular a speed scale 16 and a heading scale 17 such as are represented in particular in
Furthermore, in a preferred embodiment, said means 12 and 13 are part of said computation unit 3.
The device 1 according to the invention therefore provides the pilot of the aircraft A with gradient differences Ei which give him an indication as to the respective gradients of the next rectilinear segments Si along which the aircraft A must fly.
Furthermore, according to the invention, the corresponding presentation of characteristic signs Ci is performed on a head-up display device 5, which avoids the pilot having to lower his gaze in the cockpit and therefore facilitates the piloting of the aircraft A. In the context of the present invention, the expression “conformal projection” relative to the head-up display device 5 means that the angular representation of a particular gradient actually corresponds to the gradient displayed on the gradient scale 8, that is, that the point on the ground that such a gradient indicates actually corresponds to the point on the ground that the aircraft A would reach if it were to follow this gradient. The signs Ci give the angles αi.
It will be noted that, in the application of
This particular distance D can correspond to the distance traveled by the aircraft A at the current speed for a predetermined flight time, for example for one minute of flight.
Furthermore, in the application of
Said means 12 determine these gradients using a performance model. The latter characterizes the deceleration possibilities of the aircraft A between the initial gradient θ4 (gradient of the latest rectilinear segment S4 of the flight plan obtained from a flight management system (FMS), ending at the decision height HD) and the final gradient θ1 (generally of the order of 3°, which corresponds to a normal final approach gradient).
Said performance model takes into account, if necessary, the effect of the air brakes and/or the spoilers and, where appropriate, gives the progressive retraction height or heights of said air brakes and/or spoilers. Furthermore, the initial and final aerodynamic configurations (landing gear, flaps), and the initial and final speeds, which are obtained from the flight plan, are also computation parameters used by said means 12.
aB2=aA2+aC2−2aAaCcosa
which is obtained from the following expressions:
aA=(hA hB)/sin θA
aB=(hB hC)/sin θB
aC2=aA2+aB22aAaB cos β
β=π θA+θB
It will be noted that the different characteristic angles α1, α2, α3, α4 (
However, the aircraft A does not always necessarily present the desired gradient, that is, the current gradient of the aircraft A can be different from the precalculated gradient corresponding to the gradient of the rectilinear segment on which the aircraft A is or should be. In this case (which is represented in
Moreover, figurers 10A, 10B and 10C comprise three superimposed graphs illustrating the same situation and respectively representing a view of the aircraft A in a vertical plane, a view of the aircraft on a horizontal plane, and the corresponding display screen 7. These figures make it possible to explain the positioning of the lines 19 and 20 of the characteristic sign C4. The angles are determined from a width DO of the plane of the flight path. This width DO is a constant which is adapted to the display provided on the display screen 7. Knowing C1 and C2 (the set-point path being known), and the position of the aircraft A and the width DO, the angles Ψ0 and Ψ1 (
Moreover, to even further facilitate the piloting of the aircraft A, the device 1 according to the invention determines, automatically and repetitively, the set-point gradient of the aircraft A (along which said aircraft A must fly), and the display device 5 presents, on said display screen 7, an auxiliary symbol 21 (represented in
Furthermore, said device 1 also determines, automatically and repetitively, the distance or the flight time between the current position of the aircraft A and the position of the next change of gradient, and the display device 5 presents, on the display screen 7, a particular indication means 22 indicating this distance or this flight time. This enables the pilot to anticipate the next change of gradient (that is, the next change of rectilinear segment).
In a particular embodiment represented in
Moreover,
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
06 04543 | May 2006 | FR | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3784969 | Wilckens et al. | Jan 1974 | A |
3980258 | Simeon | Sep 1976 | A |
5289185 | Ramier et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
6347263 | Johnson et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
7064680 | Reynolds et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 462 767 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1 603 098 | Dec 2005 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080065280 A1 | Mar 2008 | US |