This application claims the benefit of the French patent application No. 1358716 filed on Sep. 11, 2013, the entire disclosures of which are incorporated herein by way of reference.
The present invention relates to a method and to a device for automatically monitoring a flight path of an aircraft during a required navigation performance operation of an aircraft, in particular a transport airplane.
Although not exclusively, the present invention applies more particularly to required navigation performance with authorization required (RNP AR) operations. These RNP AR operations are based on area navigation (RNAV) and on required navigation performance (RNP) operations. They have the distinctive feature of requiring special authorization in order to be implemented on an aircraft.
It is known that the aircraft is provided with monitoring and alert means allowing it to be ensured that said aircraft remains in a corridor, referred to as RNP, around a prescribed path. Outside of this corridor, there are potentially hilly or mountainous areas or other aircraft. The required performance for an RNP-type operation is defined by an RNP value which represents the half-width (in nautical miles (NM)) of the corridor around the reference path in which the aircraft must remain for 95% of the time during operation. A second corridor (around the reference path) of a half-width of twice the RNP value is also defined. The probability that the aircraft will leave this second corridor has to be less than 10-7 per flight hour. The concept behind RNP AR operations is yet more restrictive. The RNP AR procedures are in fact characterized in particular by RNP values which are less than or equal to 0.3 NM on approach, and which may drop as far as 0.1 NM.
Demonstrating that avionics systems allow RNP-type operations to be carried out with sufficient availability and precision is based on a statistical analysis of the different sources of error which may lead to a discrepancy between the position of the aircraft and the procedure as published on the approach charts.
Three separate sources are considered to characterize the aggregate error: an error in defining (or in calculating) the path, an error in navigation (position calculation) and an error in guidance.
During a required navigation performance operation, the position of the aircraft is monitored in real-time, and an alarm is sounded to the crew when the aircraft departs beyond an acceptable limit from the path extracted from an on-board navigation database.
In order to guard against possible coding errors in the navigation database (NDB), airlines whose aircraft implement such operations are required to validate the database each time the data is updated, currently every twenty-eight days (AIRAC cycle). In practice, this validation may be carried out on simulators of the airline by flying each RNP approach in the database that the airline wishes to operate and by ensuring that, in each case, the path flown on the simulator conforms to the published procedure.
However, this verification, which is carried out on the ground, only allows coding errors in the database to be remedied, and not extraction or corruption errors when loading the data onto the flight management system of the aircraft that is intended to calculate the flight path. In addition, guidance on the corresponding flight path and monitoring in real-time carried out at the current position of the aircraft are only relevant if the procedure loaded onto aircraft systems and then the calculation of the path are consistent. If the procedure is corrupted during or after loading or if the flight management system calculates an incorrect path, the problem is thus identified owing to the expertise of the crew (comparison with the approach charts or experience of the procedure), which allows the problem to be identified.
The problem addressed by the present invention is that of improving the integrity of the guidance based on published procedure during required navigation performance operations, in particular RNP AR operations having low values (less than 0.3, for example).
The present invention relates to a method for automatically monitoring a flight path of an aircraft during at least one required navigation performance operation, said flight path which is intended for such an operation being determined by a flight management system of the aircraft using navigation data stored in an on-board database.
For this purpose, according to the invention, said method is distinctive in that it comprises the following steps a) and b), comprising:
Therefore, since a reference path is taken into account which is accurate because it originates from ground validation of navigation data, it is possible to accurately monitor the (current) flight path in question, thereby allowing the required integrity of said path to be ensured for the implementation of a required navigation performance operation.
Within the context of the present invention, “sequence for calculating the flight path” means all the systems and conventional on-board means, including at least the flight management system, which intervene when the flight path intended to be followed by the aircraft is determined on board said aircraft.
The monitoring method may also comprise the following steps and features, taken in isolation or in combination:
In a basic embodiment, in step b), said current flight path is compared with said reference path, and it is considered to be consistent if it does not depart therefrom by a first predefined close margin.
Furthermore, said method advantageously also comprises steps comprising:
In addition, in a particular embodiment, in step b), said current flight path is compared with said average path, and it is considered to be consistent if it does not depart therefrom by a second predefined close margin.
Furthermore, said method advantageously also comprises steps comprising:
In addition, said method advantageously comprises additional steps, after step b), comprising, in real-time, during the implementation of a required navigation performance operation:
In the context of the present invention:
The present invention also relates to a device for automatically monitoring a flight path of an aircraft, in particular a transport airplane, during a required navigation performance operation, said flight path, which is intended for the required navigation performance operation, being determined by a flight management system of the aircraft using navigation data stored in an on-board database.
According to the invention, said monitoring device is distinctive in that it comprises:
In addition, in a preferred embodiment, said monitoring device also comprises:
In addition, said monitoring device advantageously also comprises:
This third calculation unit can be integrated in the flight management system or at least can transmit the bias or the corrected path to the flight management system so that the aircraft is guided along this path.
Furthermore, in a particular embodiment, said monitoring device also comprises:
The present invention also relates to:
The single figure of the accompanying drawings will enable a good understanding of how the invention can be carried out. This single figure is a block diagram of a particular embodiment of a device for automatically monitoring a flight path.
The device 1, which is shown schematically in the figure and illustrates the invention, is installed in an aircraft, in particular a transport airplane, and is intended to automatically monitor a flight path during a required navigation performance operation implemented by the aircraft.
The flight path intended for a required navigation performance operation is conventionally determined by a flight management system 2 of the aircraft, using in particular navigation data stored in an on-board database 31 which is connected to said flight management system 2 by means of a connection 32, as shown in the figure.
In the particular embodiment shown in the figure, said monitoring device 1 and said flight management system 2, which are interconnected by a connection 3, are part of the guidance system 4 of the aircraft.
According to the invention, said monitoring device 1 comprises a central unit 10, comprising:
The monitoring device 1 also comprises a display unit 9 that is connected to said central unit 10 by means of a connection 11 and is configured to present the crew with the results of the monitoring, carried out by the central unit 10 and in particular by the monitoring unit 6, on a display screen 12 in the cockpit of the aircraft.
In a preferred embodiment, said display unit 9 displays the monitoring results at least in the event of inconsistency between the current flight path TC determined by the flight management system 2 and the reference path TR.
Conventionally, during a ground validation of the navigation data intended for a required navigation performance operation (which will then be logged in the on-board database 31), a simulator is used which simulates the functioning (or flight) of the aircraft, and said navigation data are applied to said simulator, thereby allowing a path to be defined which is logged as a reference path in said memory 5 via a conventional data transmission connection 13. This reference path is sufficiently consistent with the procedure that it describes that it is able to serve as reference during the preparation and the flight within this procedure.
In a particular embodiment, in addition to the reference path, procedural information relating to the procedure is also logged in the on-board memory 5 via the data transmission connection 13.
In a preferred embodiment, logging in the on-board memory via the data transmission connection 13 is carried out in a coded manner, with additional protection in relation to the coding of the database 31, for example of the CRC type, in order to overcome corruption problems during transfer to avionics systems.
In a basic embodiment, the monitoring unit 6 comprises a comparison element 14 which is configured to compare the current flight path TC received by means of the connection 3A with said reference path TR received by means of a connection 7A (connected to the connection 7), and the monitoring unit 6 considers that the current flight path TC is consistent with said reference path TR if it does not depart therefrom by a predefined close margin.
The monitoring device 1 can be put to use on systems that are already used by airlines which operate RNP procedures and can be deployed without a significant impact on airline operations. In addition, the impact in terms of the system (storage and complementary monitoring, as specified below) is sufficiently minor for it be able to be installed on existing aircraft.
In a particular embodiment, the central unit 10 is accommodated in a flight warning computer (FWC).
Moreover, it is conceivable for the navigation database to be verified on the ground for each new cycle (AIRAC cycle), whether or not the procedure has changed, and for the test of the integrity of the database required for airline operations and the update of the information stored on board to only be triggered in the event of problems relating to the consistency between the new database and the reference procedure.
Furthermore, in a preferred embodiment, said monitoring device 1 also comprises:
In a particular embodiment, the monitoring unit 6 comprises a comparison element 19 which is configured to compare a current flight path TC, received via the connection 3A, with the average path TM (calculated by the calculation unit 17 and received via a connection 20), and the monitoring unit 6 considers that the current flight path TC is consistent with this average path TM if it does not depart therefrom by a predefined close margin. This particular embodiment, however, does not allow errors in loading and calculation to be completely overcome. In fact, it merely contributes to the improvement of the integrity of the path only with respect to non-generic errors, constant biases (NDB coding error, for example) being necessarily propagated by the calculation of the average path TM, each path being affected by the same error.
Also to overcome this drawback, in a preferred embodiment, said monitoring device 1 also comprises:
The path TM resulting from the average of the current paths allows random errors to be overcome, said path thus represents the resultant of the systematic errors in the complete sequence (position calculation, path calculation and guidance), to the extent that by comparing said path with the reference path TR, it is conceivable for automatic corrections to be implemented in order to overcome these generic errors. By correcting the current path of the bias Δ (between the reference path TR and the path TM resulting from the average of the different paths), only the random components from various error sources remain. The aggregate error is greatly reduced and the monitoring of the current path will be even more efficient (reduction in the rate of false alarms).
The monitoring device 1 can thus use the average path TM calculated by the calculation unit 17 to serve as the reference path to compare with a current path, or to correct the biases in the guidance sequence.
Furthermore, in a particular embodiment, said monitoring device 1 also comprises:
Thus, said monitoring device 1, which is independent of the flight management system 2, accommodates the real-time monitoring of the current position of the aircraft in addition to monitoring of the extraction and calculation of the path.
The invention has several advantages:
In addition, the present invention has little impact on the current, common practices of the airline operations, so that it is easier to implement, thereby allowing the monitoring device 1 to be installed on an existing aircraft.
As is apparent from the foregoing specification, the invention is susceptible of being embodied with various alterations and modifications which may differ particularly from those that have been described in the preceding specification and description. It should be understood that I wish to embody within the scope of the patent warranted hereon all such modifications as reasonably and properly come within the scope of my contribution to the art.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1358716 | Sep 2013 | FR | national |