This application is the U.S. national stage of International Application No. PCT/EP2009/052938, filed Mar. 12, 2009 and claims the benefit thereof. The International Application claims the benefits of German Application No. 102008022125.2 filed on May 5, 2008, both applications are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Described below are a method and a device for classification of sound-generating processes, of sound signals which are generated for operating processes of a machine or for chemical processes of a system for example.
In most processes sound or vibration signals are generated which characterize the processes. For example gas bubbles can arise during chemical processes which give rise to sounds in the tank facilities or in pipes. Machines or machine components which in a manufacturing or production process generate characteristic sounds or vibration signals as a function of their operating status and possibly their environmental conditions represent a further example.
The analysis of measurement data of technical processes is used for purposes such as uncovering defective components. The analysis of measurement data, especially of sound-generating processes, can be undertaken by physical models or by statistical models of the respective process. These models are created as a rule at a prototype process under laboratory conditions and are used in the field, when the device is being used in a production shop for example. In such situations it can occur that the measurement data, which is obtained on the basis of sound-generating processes, is influenced by changing environmental signals, for example because of changes in room acoustics. It can also occur that the machine being investigated or the process being investigated is operating under other operating conditions or with modified machine components. If the physical or statistical models obtained from a prototype of a process are used unchanged in the field, the quality of the analysis can fall so far that no satisfactory classification of the investigated process or of the investigated machine can be achieved. Typically a defective machine part will not be correctly classified as faulty.
Thus the physical or statistical models of the process to be investigated are adapted to the changing conditions in order to guarantee a sufficient quality of analysis. If for example an operating process of a machine part is investigated, a specific characteristic of the detected sound signal can be included for classification on the basis of the sound signal generated by the machine part. A possible characteristic of the sound signal is the volume of the sound signal or of the noise signal. If the volume of the sound signal exceeds a predeterminable threshold, the investigated machine part is classified as defective and a corresponding error is signaled. If however the environmental conditions change, for example because of an additional device sited next to the machine part, for example a fan, which generates an additional noise signal, the volume level or the preselected threshold will be exceeded and a fault-free machine part will be mistakenly classified as faulty. Thus in a known method of operation setting a meaningful threshold value or classification criterion is complex and time-intensive, since under some circumstances noise signals from defective machine parts which are installed as extra parts in the machine for the purpose, must also be measured to set a suitable threshold value. A further disadvantage of this known method of operation lies in that fact that, when the environmental signals change rapidly, a necessary adaptation of the physical and statistical models often occurs too slowly, so that the necessary quality of the analysis cannot be obtained in good time.
An aspect is to classify sound-generating processes by carrying out a model adaptation automatically with little computing effort and to guarantee a fault-free classification of sound-generating processes even if environmental conditions are changing rapidly.
The method classifies sound-generating processes with the following:
In an embodiment, the sound signal is generated by a working process of a machine.
In an embodiment, the sound signal is generated by a chemical process of a system.
In an embodiment, the sound signal is formed by an airborne sound signal or by a body sound signal.
In an embodiment, the detected sound signal is converted by a sensor into an electric signal.
In an embodiment, the detected electric sound signal is lowpass filtered.
In an embodiment, the analog sound signal is converted into a digital sound signal by an analog-to-digital converter.
In an embodiment, predetermined time windows of the digitized sound signal are subjected to a frequency transformation for creating a sound signal spectrum.
In an embodiment, characteristics of the sound signal are extracted from the time range of from the frequency range.
In an embodiment, feature vectors which exhibit the extracted characteristics are formed for each sound-generating process at different measurement times.
In an embodiment, statistical distribution parameters are computed for each characteristic from a number of characteristic vectors of a process.
In an embodiment the statistical distribution parameters of a characteristic have an average value and a variance of the respective characteristic.
In an embodiment, a distance between the statistical distribution parameters of different sound signals is computed to determine a similarity between the sound signals.
In an embodiment, sound signals similar to one another of processes of which the statistical distribution parameters are at a short distance from one another are grouped into a process cluster.
In an embodiment, the statistical distribution parameters of the reference model are computed on the basis of extracted characteristics of a sound signal which is emitted by a prototype.
In an embodiment, the number of processes within the differently formed process clusters is determined.
In an embodiment, that process cluster is selected of which the number of processes grouped within it is at a maximum.
In an embodiment, the classification of the sound-generating processes is undertaken on the basis of an adapted model by a maximum-likelihood method.
A device for classification of sound-generating processes includes:
These and other aspects and advantages will become more apparent and more readily appreciated from the following description of the exemplary embodiments, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings of which:
Reference will now be made in detail to the preferred embodiments, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals refer to like elements throughout.
A simple exemplary embodiment for the method for classification of sound-generating processes is shown in
In S1 generated sound signals of the processes, for example the sound-generating processes which are produced by the six wheels shown in
In S2 specific characteristics m are extracted from the detected sound signals for the respective process P. A sound signal can feature a plurality of different characteristics m. One possible characteristic m is the volume or the sound level of the signal for example. Further possible characteristics are amplitudes or signal levels at different frequencies, especially modulation frequencies. These frequencies can be predetermined for example by a rotational frequency frot of a rotating or a turning body. In the simple exemplary embodiment shown in
In S3, a similarity between the detected sound signals is computed on the basis of the extracted characteristics for grouping processes with sound signals similar to one another into process clusters C. In this case for example a distance A or a space between the characteristic vectors V in a multi-dimensional vector space is computed.
In S4 statistical distribution parameters of a reference model are adapted as a function of the statistical distribution parameters of those processes P which are contained in that process cluster C having the highest number of processes grouped within it.
The reference model adapted in S4 is used in S5 for classifying the sound-generating processes P. The classification in S5 can typically be undertaken by a maximum-likelihood algorithm.
A classification unit 7 which is connected via lines 8 to the adaptation unit 4, then classifies the sound-generating processes P based on the model adapted by the adaptation unit 4 and the measurement data M of the processes P.
In a machine a sound-generating process P generates a sound or vibration signal which is detected by a microphone 2. The airborne sound signal is converted by the microphone 2 into an electrical signal and is lowpass filtered by a low pass filter 9. The lowpass-filtered signal is sampled by an analog-to-digital converter 10 with a specific sampling frequency and digitized.
In the exemplary embodiment shown in
On the basis of the characteristic vectors V of the various processes created P1 through P6 or of the different machine parts a similarity calculation is undertaken. For this purpose distances or spaces between the characteristics m are calculated. For a possible embodiment that various times t1 to tM the characteristic vectors V for the different processes P are calculated and from them a vector V or a matrix of statistical distribution parameters is calculated.
The following equation illustrates the method of operation.
For the specified example the statistical distribution parameter is the average value μ of the characteristic m over a predetermined number of measuring points ti. As well as the statistical distribution parameter average value μ further statistical distribution parameters such as for example the variance σ can be calculated. In this case for example a Gaussian distribution in accordance with
On the basis of the statistical distribution parameters of the different processes P determined a distance can be calculated in pairs between processes. For example distance Δ between two processes P1, P2 is calculated as follows:
Distance(P1/P2=|μ1p1−μ1p2|2+|μ1p2−μ1p2|2+|μ1p3−μ1p3|2 (2).
As soon as the similarity between the different sound signals of the different processes P or the distances Δ between the sound signals is calculated on the basis of the statistical distribution parameters, those processes P which have similar sound signals to one another, can be grouped into process clusters.
A description has been provided with particular reference to preferred embodiments thereof and examples, but it will be understood that variations and modifications can be effected within the spirit and scope of the claims which may include the phrase “at least one of A, B and C” as an alternative expression that means one or more of A, B and C may be used, contrary to the holding in Superguide v. DIRECTV, 358 F3d 870, 69 USPQ2d 1865 (Fed. Cir. 2004).
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 2008 022 125 | May 2008 | DE | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2009/052938 | 3/12/2009 | WO | 00 | 11/5/2010 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2009/135719 | 11/12/2009 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5602761 | Spoerre et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5675497 | Petsche et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 6006170 | Marcantonio et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6227036 | Yonak et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6591226 | Hartmann et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 20020013664 | Strackeljan et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
| 20050059046 | LaBrenz et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
| 20070100623 | Hentschel et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070291958 | Jehan | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080069366 | Soulodre | Mar 2008 | A1 |
| 20080144927 | Hashimoto et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
| 20090115635 | Berger et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 4207728 | Sep 1993 | DE |
| 102004023824 | Dec 2005 | DE |
| 102008022125.2 | May 2008 | DE |
| 102006056106 | Sep 2008 | DE |
| 0371631 | Jun 1990 | EP |
| 1 307 833 | Jun 2006 | EP |
| 1 813 921 | Aug 2007 | EP |
| 9954703 | Oct 1999 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Yang et al., A Study on Retrospective and Online Event Detection, 1998, ACM, pp. 28-36. |
| Fraley et al. How Many Clusters? Which Clustering Method? ANswers Via Model-Based Cluster Analysis, 1998, THe COmputer Journal, pp. 1-11. |
| S. Huebner; “DSPRolog: Quick Reference”; Version 1.1; Apr. 2007; printed from tocsy.agnid.uni-potsdam.de/DSProlog/Manual.pdf; pp. 1-47. |
| S. Hübner; “Wissensbasierte Modellierung von Audio-Signal-Kassifikatoren”; Zur Bioakustik von Tursiops truncatus; printed from opus.kobv.de/ubp/volltexte/2008/1663; Dissertation, Potsdam University; Aug. 2006; pp. 1-209. |
| Communication from European Patent Office mailed Aug. 12, 2010 for Application No. PCT/EP2009/052938. |
| International Search Report for Application No. PCT/EP2009/052938; mailed Jun. 4, 2009. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20110060564 A1 | Mar 2011 | US |