1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to methods of combusting high molecular weight liquid hydrocarbon fuels by co-firing with a more combustible supplemental fuel. More particularly, this invention presents a method and device that effectively combusts heavy hydrocarbon fuel oils by injecting them through a zone of combusting hydrogen where the oil is finely dispersed, partially vaporized and ignited . Since the method presented utilizes a relatively small amount of hydrogen fuel, a low-volume hydrogen source such as the electrolysis of water can be used to generate the required rates of hydrogen. Combustion of heavy oils using hydrogen generated from the electrolysis of water presents a significant achievement over present methods and devices which combust heavy fuel oils by co-firing with large amounts of natural gas. Using the combusting hydrogen to disperse the fuel oil provides the requisite degree of atomization without the need for compressed non-combustible gases, such as steam or air. When used with vegetable oils, the combustion method and device presented herein offers an economical alternative to producing heat energy using only renewable energy sources.
2. The Relevant Technology
Because high-molecular weight, or heavy liquid fuel oils are of such low volatility, a significant amount of heat and mechanical energy must be input to render these fuels into a readily combustible state. Typically, a heavy oil must be heated from ambient temperature to its flash point with even more heat applied to vaporize some of the oil molecules prior to combustion. Co-firing the heavy oil with a readily combustible gas is well known as an effective method of providing the heat load necessary to render the oil to a readily combustible state. Natural gas is presently the most common co-firing fuel since it is highly combustible and often the least costly supplemental fuel source. Natural gas is, however, a non-renewable energy source that may not readily available in some areas and may be subject to other competing domestic and industrial uses.
A majority of present burner designs employ various means of preheating, atomizing and mixing the heavy oil with the hot flue gases from the combusting co-firing fuel to improve heat transfer. Fuel atomization increases the exposed surface area of the liquid fuel, which increases the rate of vaporization. Three primary means are employed for atomizing the liquid fuel: 1) liquid feed nozzles, 2) high-pressure steam or air-assisted jetting, or 3) rotating cups. Examples of these atomizing methods include Pressure Jet Atomizers and, Steam or Air Assisted Jet Atomizers and Low pressure Air Atomizers. The Pressure Jet Atomizer utilizes high oil feed pressure to atomize the fuel into a spray of finely dispersed droplets. The fuel oil is fed into a swirl chamber by means of tangential ports in the main atomizer body. An air core is set up due to the vortex formed in the swirl chamber, which results in the fuel leaving the final orifice as a thin annular film. The angular and axial velocity of this film causes the fuel to develop into a hollow cone as it discharges from the orifice. One major problem with these types of burners is that the atomizer has a distorted spray angle as the fuel flow rates are reduced, which often results in fuel/flame impingement on the furnace walls.
The External-mix Steam Atomizer or Steam-assisted Pressure Jet Atomizer type burners are designed to make full use of pressure jet atomization at high firing rates and blast atomization at low firing rates. The external-mix style employs an atomizer with a pressure jet tip, around which is provided a steam supply channel. The steam exits this annular passage way through a gap at an angle and swirl that substantially matches the oil-spray cone angle. Since the fuel oil and steam are not pre-mixed, the output is unaffected by slight variations in the steam pressure. An alternate method is the internal-mix steam atomizer, which is comprised of two concentric tubes, a one-piece nozzle and a sealing nut. The steam is supplied through the center tube and the fuel oil through the outer tube. The outlet of the center steam tube has a number of discharge nozzles arranged on a pitch circle such that each oil bore meets a corresponding steam bore in a point of intersection. At the steam exits these nozzles, it mixes with the oil forming an emulsion of oil and steam at high pressure. The expansion of this mixture as it issues from the final orifice produces a spray of finely atomized oil.
The Rotary Cup atomizer employs a cup-shaped member that rotates at high speeds (around 5000 RPM) by an electric motor and belt drive. The fuel oil flows at low pressure into the conical spinning cup where it distributes uniformly on the inner surface and is spun off the cup rim as a very fine oil film. A primary air fan discharges air concentrically around the cup, striking the oil film at high velocity and atomizing it into tiny droplets. The rotary cup burner has good turn down ratio and is relatively insensitive to contaminants in the fuel oil. The Low-Pressure Air Atomizer employs a principle is similar to that of the rotary-cup-atomizing, but the liquid fuel is forced to rotate in a fixed cup by means of a forcefully rotating primary airflow.
Although the aforementioned burners are typically designed to combust lighter fuel oils, such as diesel fuel, they must be modified to combust heavier fuel oils. Typical modifications include equipping the combustion chamber or the area around the oil filming/atomizing device with a plurality of ports where a natural gas can be fed to the combustion zone. The natural gas is ignited first and the oil flow is started once a stable gas flame is established. As the molecular weight of the fuel oil increases, the amount of natural gas required to completely combust the oil also increases. Although natural gas is presently the most common co-firing fuel, the amount required to thoroughly combust a heavy oil can be substantial.
Hydrogen is generally known to be an improved co-firing fuel primarily because its heat of combustion and adiabatic flame temperature are much higher than methane, the primary constituent of natural gas (61,100 btu/ft3 versus 23,879 btu/lb on a gross basis, 3,861° F. versus 3,371° F.). For a typical direct co-firing burner, more than 2.5 times as much natural gas would be theoretically required to produce the same amount of heat as a given mass of combusting hydrogen. Also, hydrogen is further preferred over natural gas because it can be generated from renewable energy resources and its combustion product, water vapor, is more friendly to the environment. However, simply replacing natural gas with hydrogen is not generally feasible because even 2.5 times less gas rate would still constitute a significant hydrogen demand for a standard industrial-sized burner and methods do not presently exist that can economically generate and store large volumes of hydrogen for such an application.
Although the potential benefits of using hydrogen as a co-firing fuel are generally known, the practical difficulties of handling and combusting hydrogen have largely prevented the development of useful combustion devices employing hydrogen as a co-firing fuel. Hydrogen's extreme combustibility makes its generation, storage and handling expensive and potentially dangerous. Secondly, hydrogen's flame velocity is more than 8 times as fast as a typical heavy fuel oil flame velocity. This characteristic makes co-firing by conventional burners largely ineffective because the hydrogen burn rate substantially outpaces the fuel oil burn rate and the flame propagation may not be stable without a large excess of hydrogen.
The inventors understood that effective utilization of hydrogen as a co-firing fuel for heavy fuel oils would require a novel combustion method that could accommodate the special characteristics of combusting hydrogen and use relatively small quantities. The inventors felt that the favorable properties of hydrogen, i.e. high combustion heat and rapid flame velocity, could be harnessed to combust a class of liquid fuels, which are abundantly available and renewable but are not economically combusted using present methods or devices. Also, by reducing the volume of hydrogen required, a relatively simple method such as the electrolysis of water, could be used to generate the hydrogen “on-demand,” eliminating the need for complex hydrogen generation and storage methods that might otherwise be required. Although the heavy oil fuels preferred by the inventors for this application are raw vegetable oils, the concept and application can be usefully applied to a broad range of other combustible liquid fuels.
It is the objective of this combustion method and device to provide an economical option to the production of heat energy completely from renewable fuels, such as bio-fuel oils and hydrogen, where the value of the heat energy produced exceeds the sum costs of the fuels, equipment, and power input to produce that heat energy.
It is still a further objective of this combustion method and device to provide an effective means of combusting these heavy oil fuels utilizing hydrogen generated “on demand” by the electrolysis of water such that no ancillary equipment for separation, compression or storage of hydrogen is required and safety is maintained by minimizing the volume of hydrogen staged within the system.
The graphic representation shown in
In continued reference to
Using hydrogen flame turbulence as a second stage blast atomizing means overcomes two significant problems encountered with combustion of heavy fuel oils. First, the method produces a significantly smaller liquid fuel droplet size in the combustion zone than is achievable by typical atomizing nozzles or orifices, without the need for preheating the fuel or injecting compressed air or steam. Secondly, it partially vaporizes a small quantity of the fuel oil and disperses that vapor throughout the primary fuel/air mixture so that once ignited, the heat of the combusting fuel oil vapor is more efficiently utilized to further vaporize any remaining liquid fuel.
An additional feature of this combustion method is the continuous ignition of the vaporized portion of the primary fuel oil by high-speed rotation of the hydrogen flames. As the atomized primary fuel travels past the tips of the hydroxy gas tubes 20 and 21, any vaporized primary fuel must first be ignited. This ignition occurs as one of the rotating hydrogen flames fronts extending outwardly from the tips of the hydroxy gas tubes contacts the vaporized primary fuel. Experimentation showed that as the rotational speed of the rigid shaft dropped below the forward flame velocity of the hydrogen, the primary fuel's combustion efficiency began to decrease, resulting in smoking of the flame. This is thought to be due to the decrease in coverage of the hydrogen flames in the area above the feeding tubes. At rotational speeds less than the forward flame velocity of the hydrogen, some of the primary fuel appears to pass through zone 10 without contacting a hydrogen flame front, thus decreasing dispersion, vaporization and ignition efficiency of the primary fuel. This theory is supported by additional experiments that showed increasing the rotational speed above the forward flame velocity of the hydrogen did not provide any increase in combustion efficiency or primary fuel flame stability. The inventor's chose a standard speed achievable by readily available motors that produced a rotational speed of the hydrogen flames greater than 8.0 feet per second. For the size burner tested by the inventors, 400 liters per hour of hydroxy gas were required to effectively burn 25 gallons per hour of cottonseed oil.
Oxygen to support the combustion of hydrogen in zone 10 is best supplied by pre-mixing the hydrogen and oxygen prior to entering the feed tubes 20 and 21. This is most easily done by using the electrolysis of water as the hydrogen source since the “hydroxy” gas produced is already in the proper stoichiometric proportion for combustion. Oxygen to support the combustion of the heavy oil is supplied by ambient air, which can be drafted into zone 11b by an external air fan. One drawback to the use of hydrogen as a co-firing fuel is that the high flame temperature of combusting hydrogen can oxidize nitrogen present in the draft air and create NOx emissions that are undesirable. By using hydrogen and oxygen from electrolysis, ambient air is not necessary to fuel the hydrogen's combustion. Thus, since nitrogen gases are virtually non-existent in the hydrogen combustion zone, very little if any NOx is generated from the high-temperature hydrogen combustion zone.
The shapes and combustion zone interactions depicted in Figures are greatly simplified for purposes of disclosing the underlying principals involved with this combustion method. Variations in the heavy oil fuel properties, air draft rate, fuel atomization, fuel feed rate and orientation of the burner will result in distortions of these shapes. Also, these shapes are not in reality smooth conical shapes but rather zones of somewhat conical proportions where the peak of the combustion events occur. In an alternate embodiment of this combustion method, multiple zones of combusting hydrogen can be established downstream of zone 10 along the axis of rotation to provide additional heat energy heat to ensure efficient combustion of even heavier fuels. Such multiple-staged hydroxy combustion zones can be created by additional hydroxy feeding tubes projecting outwardly from the rotating shaft or by surrounding the rigid shaft 12 with a second shaft, rotating in an opposite direction along the same axis.
To accomplish this combustion method, the inventors had to overcome several issues relating to the transport of the hydroxy gas from the electrolytic cell where it is generated into the rotating shaft 12 and through to the tips of the tubes 20 and 21 where the hydrogen combustion occurs. First, hydroxy gas is extremely combustible and will auto-ignite at relatively low pressures when heated. Radiant and convective heat from the combustion zones 10 and 11 will tend to heat the burner components near the combustion area. To prevent thermal-induced auto-ignition before the hydroxy gas reaches the tips of the tubes, the inventors were required to keep the feed gas pressure as low as possible. However, when the shaft 12 is rotated, centrifugal forces act to prevent molecules from entering the feeding tubes. Also, since oxygen has a higher molecular weight than hydrogen, the centrifuge effect created by the rotating shaft tends to move oxygen molecules away from the axis of rotation relative to the hydrogen, which causes separation of the hydrogen and oxygen molecules inside the feeding tubes.
As best shown in
The rotation of the shaft 12 at sufficiently high speeds created a second problem of separation of the hydrogen and oxygen molecules inside the shaft chamber 24. This separation tends to destabilize the flames at the tips of the tubes because the hydrogen and oxygen are not adequately mixed before entering the combustion area. The inventors overcame this problem by inducing mixing turbulence inside the outlet channel 25 just prior to exiting into the combustion zone. This mixing turbulence results from the change in flow direction relative to the axis of the shaft channel 24 as represented by the outlet tip angle gamma. A stable hydrogen flame was found to be produced with an angle gamma of 40-50 degrees. Angles greater than this resulted in increased hydrogen and fuel oil flame-outs (i.e., loss of ignition) and ineffective envelopment of the fuel oil in the zone of combusting hydrogen.
The inventors' preferred means of creating the oil feeding tube 13, the inlet channel 23, and the shaft channel 24 as shown in
As best seen in
Although the inventors' preferred embodiment utilizes three staging chambers, for liquid fuel, hydroxy gas and cooling fluid, more chambers could be added to accommodate a range of other materials to be injected into the combustion zone, such as environmental wastes or additives to control smoking, and others. The shaft length can be extended as necessary to accommodate the additional staging chambers. Multiple feeding tubes can also be bored into the shaft to provide transport conduits for the contents of these additional chambers.
The rear fuel oil staging chamber 33, the middle hydroxy staging chamber 32, and the forward cooling fluid staging chamber 32 are each comprised of forward and rear circular mating flanges welded on the ends of a center tube. FIGS. 5 shows a side view of one of these staging chambers comprised of the circular mating flanges 65 and 66, and the center tube 67. These mating flanges 65 and 66 are circular shaped metal disks with an inner recess of diameter d2 machined slightly larger than the inside diameter of the center tube to a depth approximately one-half of the flange thickness t. A plurality of bolt holes 63 are drilled along an outer bolt diameter d3 for receiving a plurality of bolts which fasten one chamber to another. The flange thickness t is that necessary to provide a sufficiently rigid body that can withstand the pressures inside the chamber and can maintain planar shape during the machining process. The number of bolt holes can match any ANSI bolt pattern sufficient to withstand the pressures inside the chamber and ensure adequate sealing. Each staging chamber can be defined as an annular void space around the shaft 12. The length of each chamber's center tube L marks the axial bounds of the chamber while the diameter of the center tube d1 marks the radial bounds of each chamber. These axial and radial bounds are limited only by the dimensions necessary to accommodate internal mechanical seals around the rotating shaft inside the forward and rear staging chambers. Each chamber tube has a inlet port for receiving the fuel streams. The forward coolant staging chamber has two ports so that the oil fuel/water mixture can be circulated through the chamber before entering the rear fuel oil staging chamber.
Referring back to
Referring back to
Referring back to
In continued reference to