The present invention relates to a method for compensating positional and/or shape deviations in Numerical Control (NC)-controlled cutting production machines, and to an NC-controlled cutting production machine having a device for compensating positional and/or shape deviations in workpieces. During machining, in particular of materials that are difficult to machine and of labile components such as those often used in modern engine construction, as a rule there occur systematic positional and shape deviations that are caused primarily by the internal stress of the material and by pressure displacement of the tool or of the workpiece due to their elastic deformation. During processing using NC-controlled machines, these errors have the result that the milled geometry deviates from the programmed geometry, thus lying outside the tolerances according to the drawing.
When the existing material internal stresses of a workpiece are dismantled by milling, there often occur torsions or warpings that can assume significant dimensions depending on the component geometry, and that have the result that the geometry of the workpiece lies outside manufacturing tolerances. In addition, the tool and/or the workpiece are pressed out of the target position by the machining forces. The magnitude of the pressure depends essentially on the machining force and on the rigidity of the overall system consisting of the workpiece, the tool, and the machine.
These are undesirable effects that result in a high rejection rate, a high post-processing expense, and, therefore, increased manufacturing costs and high piece costs.
In addition, from the prior art NC-controlled cutting production machines are known. As a rule, in such machines the NC programs are nominally pre-programmed, during their creation, with the corresponding parameters, such as the positional and geometric data of the workpiece to be processed, and additional data such as data relating to, for example, advance speed and cutting speed.
In addition, for example from U.S. Pat. No. 4,660,148, input modules are known that are intended to permit certain data inputs to the NC machine to be made on location by an operator, including the inputting of non-variable data and geometric data of the workpiece. Here, positional and/or shape deviations due to material characteristics and/or tool characteristics are not taken into account.
Therefore, the object of the present invention is to provide an improved method and an improved device for compensating positional and shape deviations that avoid the disadvantages of the prior art, thus providing an economical solution with a reduced manufacturing expense.
The present invention makes it possible to avoid the disadvantages of the prior art, and provides an economical solution with reduced manufacturing costs. The above-described positional and/or shape deviations are as a rule systematic errors that are compensated according to the present invention by returning the set difference or difference between the target value and the actual value to an NC program that controls the production device. In addition, deformations caused by the release of material internal stresses are compensated. Moreover, transitions between tools having different pressure displacements can be compensated. It is also possible to compensate shape deviations caused by non-uniform finishing, i.e., pre-finishing for constant allowance oversizing situation during finishing is no longer required. In this way, operating sequences can be significantly reduced.
According to the present invention, a method is proposed for compensating positional and/or shape deviations in NC-controlled cutting production machines, the method having the following steps:
securing a new workpiece; processing the workpiece using nominal data of the NC program; acquiring set deviation data; optimizing the NC program using the acquired data; and repeating steps a) to d) until at least one of required positional and shape tolerances are achieved.
Here, the “nominal” data of the NC program are the theoretical or design values inputted by the programmer in a first run of the NC program, and the data automatically optimized by the NC program in the subsequent iterative steps or steps on the basis of the measured values.
The control loop is situated quasi-externally to the NC machine. The sections of the component that are to be corrected are first nominally milled. Subsequently, the set deviations are acquired and are returned to the NC program. The next component is then manufactured using the optimized NC program. This process is iteratively repeated until the required positional and shape tolerances have been achieved.
An alternative method according to the present invention for compensating positional and shape deviations in NC-controlled cutting production machines has the following steps:
preparing a workpiece in which an allowance is greater than at least one of a maximum positional deviation and a shape deviation that is to be expected; acquiring deviation data; optimizing the NC program using the acquired data; and finishing of the workpiece using a modified NC program.
This represents a second method for returning the set deviation to the NC program. In this method, the closed control loop is run within the NC processing machine during the processing of an individual component. Here, in a first step the component is processed in such a way that the segments of the component that are to be corrected are first only first-finished. The finishing allowance must be greater than the maximum positional and shape deviations that are to be expected. In a second step, the set deviation for the first-finished areas is acquired by corresponding measurement devices inside the machine. In a further step, the determined deviations are then returned to the NC program and are automatically implemented in this program. The component is then finally milled using the optimized finishing program. For the next component, this method is repeated in the same way, so that it is also possible to compensate for non-systematic, individual flaws in an individual workpiece.
Given an external control loop, the NC program is optimized for one component, or, iteratively, for a plurality of components. If the set deviation lies within the allowable tolerance, all following components can then be processed using the same NC program without further optimization. Given an internal control loop, the program optimization takes place individually for each component.
An advantageous development of the method according to the present invention provides that the acquisition of the set deviation takes place using a tactile measurement method or an optical measurement method. In order to acquire the set deviation, all measurement or test methods may be used with which the deviation can be determined with the required quality and quantity. Inter alia, the acquisition can be carried out using tactile systems (measurement probes), e.g.: measurement machines or measurement probes inside the processing machine; optical acquisition (laser triangulation, extended optical measurement systems) inside or outside the processing machine are also possible measurement methods. However, acquisition can also take place using manual measurement means or special measurement means.
Another advantageous development of the method according to the present invention provides that the returning of the set deviation to the NC program takes place in such a way that a correction vector is allocated to each support point of the tool path. The correction vector consists of the magnitude and the direction of the set deviation. Each support point of the tool path is then displaced by the associated correction vector.
An advantageous development of the method according to the present invention provides that the determination of the correction vectors takes place in such a way that the actual geometry is set into clear comparison with the target geometry. The correction vectors are determined by placing the acquired actual geometry, i.e. the determined measurement data, into comparison with the target geometry, determined for example from a CAD model. Here it is of decisive importance that the corresponding regions or support points be set off against one another.
An advantageous development of the method according to the present invention provides that the clear comparison between the associated areas be defined by synchronizing markings that are set between areas having a strong curvature change. Synchronizing markings are always to be placed between areas between which the curvature changes strongly. If all measurement points, i.e. the actual geometry, are set into relation with the associated points in the CAD model, i.e. the target geometry, a vector field is obtained with which the corresponding support points of the NC program can be adjusted. The clear comparison between the correction vectors of the vector field and the NC program is produced using the same synchronizing markings that were already used for the actual geometry and the target geometry.
An NC-controlled cutting production machine according to the present invention having a device for compensating positional and/or shape deviations in workpieces comprises the following: a control unit that has a storage unit for storing a target geometry of a workpiece, a measurement device for acquiring the actual geometry of a workpiece, and a computing unit for calculating the set deviation, which controls the further processing of the workpiece, or automatically optimizes the NC program, corresponding to the set deviation.
These components are advantageously integrated into the production machine, but can also be situated outside the machine, in the case of what is called an external control loop.
An advantageous specific embodiment of the NC-controlled cutting production machine is an NC-controlled milling machine.
An advantageous specific embodiment of the NC-controlled cutting production machine has tactile or optical measurement devices for acquiring the actual geometry. The tactile or optical measurement devices are advantageously integrated into the actual cutting machine, but here it is also possible for the measurement devices to be connected externally.
Additional measures that improve the present invention are indicated in the subclaims, and are shown in more detail below together with the description of a preferred exemplary embodiment of the present invention on the basis of the Figures.
The control loop takes place outside the NC machine. The parts of the component that are to be corrected are first nominally milled. Subsequently, the set deviations are acquired and are returned to the NC program. The next component is then manufactured using the optimized NC program. This process is iteratively repeated until the required positional and shape tolerances are achieved.
With the external control loop, the NC program is optimized to one component, or is iteratively optimized to a plurality of components. If the set deviation lies within the allowable tolerance, all subsequent components can then be processed using the same NC program without further optimization.
The illustrations in
Finally,
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2005 050 205 | Oct 2005 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/DE2006/001832 | 10/17/2006 | WO | 00 | 9/3/2008 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2007/045223 | 4/26/2007 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4031368 | Colding et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4382215 | Barlow et al. | May 1983 | A |
4428055 | Zurbrick et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4499359 | Obara | Feb 1985 | A |
4523135 | Kogawa | Jun 1985 | A |
4555610 | Polad et al. | Nov 1985 | A |
4603391 | Inoue et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4605886 | Inoue | Aug 1986 | A |
4731607 | Yoneda et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4748554 | Gebauer et al. | May 1988 | A |
4790697 | Hines et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4816729 | Carlson | Mar 1989 | A |
4864520 | Setoguchi et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4905417 | Oda et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4963805 | Suzuki et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4967515 | Tsujiuchi et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4992948 | Pilland et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5031107 | Suzuki et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5047966 | Crow et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5060164 | Yoneda et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5088055 | Oyama | Feb 1992 | A |
5117169 | Kakino et al. | May 1992 | A |
5355705 | Schulze et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5411430 | Nishimura et al. | May 1995 | A |
5412300 | Meyer et al. | May 1995 | A |
5465474 | Kimura et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5614800 | Nakano et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5691909 | Frey et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5710709 | Oliver et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5748482 | Nishimura | May 1998 | A |
5815400 | Hirai et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5841096 | Takahashi et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5898590 | Wampler et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5903459 | Greenwood et al. | May 1999 | A |
5910040 | Moriyasu et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5940301 | Damman et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5953233 | Higasayama et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6032377 | Ichikawa et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6233533 | Xu et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6246920 | Mizuno et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256546 | Graham et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6535788 | Yoshida et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6539642 | Moriyasu et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6571145 | Matsumiya et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6681145 | Greenwood et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6823235 | Toyozawa et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6862492 | Sagasaki et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6892153 | Puchtler | May 2005 | B2 |
6912446 | Wang et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7075531 | Ando et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7450127 | Hong et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7479959 | Han et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7686988 | Hosoe | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7869899 | Hammond et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
20010012972 | Matsumoto et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20030018408 | Sagae et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040083024 | Wang | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040174358 | Takagi | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20070171223 | McArdle et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20090112357 | Hammond et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20100119104 | Mamour et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
36 20 422 | Jan 1988 | DE |
0 326 625 | Aug 1989 | EP |
0 431 572 | Jun 1991 | EP |
WO 2004103622 | Dec 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090132080 A1 | May 2009 | US |