The present disclosure relates to a method with the features of the preamble of claim 1 and an internal combustion engine with the features of the preamble of claim 9.
The degradation (aging or wear) of internal combustion engines in terms of control technology has up to now been compensated by making use of the control reserve of a turbocharger bypass (the control reserve of the turbocharger bypass is given by that control range of the bypass valve which does not have to be provided for the normal operation of the internal combustion engine), wherein the compressor (and/or an exhaust-gas turbine, then it is called a wastegate) of a turbocharger is flowed around by the turbocharger bypass.
In a newly manufactured internal combustion engine this control reserve can be used as an additional pressure drop in an intake tract of the internal combustion engine, as long as the turbocharger is operated within the specified operating limits. With increasing degradation of the internal combustion engine, the control reserve of the turbocharger bypass must be used to compensate for the effects of degradation, so that in the end the additional pressure drop in the intake tract is reduced to the initial value.
Air filters of internal combustion engines are used to separate particles from the charge air and to ensure a certain purity of the charge air. The air filter is thereby subject to an aging process, which is called load, and which traces back to separated particles in the filter media. As a result, the differential pressure (difference of the pressure in the intake tract upstream of the air filter and of the pressure downstream of the air filter) increases in the course of increasing operating hours. This differential pressure is part of the total pressure drop through the intake tract, which leads to an increase in the compression ratio of the turbocharger and a reduced control reserve for the turbocharger bypass. It is therefore necessary to limit the maximum pressure drop and thus the maximum permitted differential pressure via the air filter in order to continue to allow operation of the turbocharger within the operating limits using the control reserve of the turbocharger bypass.
The service life of an air filter depends on the state of the supplied charge air (environmental conditions, dust load) for a given size of the air filter, the operation mode of the internal combustion engine and the specified maximum permitted differential pressure.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,606,311 and 8,626,456 describe the measurement of a pressure drop via an air filter and the comparison with a specified maximum permitted differential pressure to determine a degradation of the air filter.
U.S. Pat. No. 8,534,123 reveals the economic optimization of the replacement intervals for an air filter based on fuel consumption, the differential pressure via the air filter and the cost.
U.S. Pat. No. 9,061,224 extrapolates a remaining service life of the air filter.
It has been found that the assessment of the state of an air filter, which is based solely on the differential pressure, commonly causes a too early replacement of such a still usable air filter.
The object of the disclosure is to provide a generic method and a generic internal combustion engine in which the above-described problems are resolved.
This object is achieved by a method with the features of claim 1 and an internal combustion engine with the features of claim 9. Advantageous embodiments of the disclosure are defined in the dependent claims.
By control reserve in the present disclosure is that control range of a control element meant, which in the normal control operation of the internal combustion engine must not be used.
The remaining control reserve, e.g. of a compressor bypass, which is dependent on the degradation state of an internal combustion engine, can be used to adjust the maximum permitted differential pressure of an air filter and while still maintaining an acceptable control reserve. This increases the service life of the air filter, since a greater maximum permitted differential pressure can be tolerated.
The control reserve (shown here with the example of a compressor bypass) is the ratio between compressor bypass mass flow to compressor total mass flow. The bypass mass flow is derived from the operating pressures and the pressure loss characteristic curve of the valve manufacturer. The total mass flow can be calculated with the knowledge of the person skilled in the art from the cubic capacity of a single combustion chamber, the number of combustion chambers, the volumetric efficiency, the charge-air pressure, the charge temperature and the charge-air density of the internal combustion engine as well as the speed.
As it is known, how big the control reserve is, it can be used to allow a higher maximum permitted differential pressure for the air filter. If the internal combustion engine is degraded, this control reserve decreases and the maximum permitted differential pressure must be reduced.
A remaining control range of a control variable for the current of a fuel-air mixture or an exhaust gas can be used as a control reserve by the internal combustion engine. Examples for such a control reserve, which can be used in any combination, in addition to the position of a bypass valve of a turbocharger bypass, e.g. the position of the throttle valve of the internal combustion engine, are the position of a wastegate, an adjustable geometry of the turbocharger, etc.
In addition or alternatively, a control element for the specific energy density of the fuel-air mixture (lambda value)—for example a gas metering valve—or a control element for the spark ignition time for the spark ignition of a fuel-air mixture in the combustion chambers of the internal combustion engine) can be isolated or used in any combination as a control reserve or for the volumetric efficiency (a variable valve train adjustment) or for an EGR rate (exhaust gas recirculation rate).
It is, in an embodiment provided that a load state of the air filter is being determined. The load state can, for example, be determined by measuring the present differential pressure of the air filter or by weighing the air filter. An appropriate scale can be implemented, for example, in a storage of the air filter so that the measurement can take place during the operation of the internal combustion engine without disassembly of the air filter.
It is, in an embodiment provided to calculate a standard air flow from operating variables of the internal combustion engine (for example, according to the above calculation of the compressor mass flow minus the compressor bypass and propellant gas mass flow using the standard density for air). The actual present air flow can be calculated in a well-known manner taking into account the ambient pressure and the charge-air temperature from the standard air flow. The comparison of a measured differential pressure via the air filter with the maximum permitted differential pressure can take place for the actually present air flow.
The maximum permitted differential pressure present at a specified time and the differential pressure measured can be reported by a control device of the internal combustion engine to an operator of the internal combustion engine.
The measurement of the actually present differential pressure (which is representative of a load state of the air filter) and of the operating variables of the internal combustion engine for the calculation of the standard air flow and the measurement of the ambient pressure and the charge-air temperature can be done continuously or cyclically.
It is, in an embodiment provided that the degradation of the air filter and also that of the internal combustion engine is monitored and
that it gets calculated which maximum permitted differential pressure may be authorized
and/or extrapolated into the future and estimated, when the air filter must be replaced.
The internal combustion engine is designed as spark-ignited gas engine. The internal combustion engine is designed as a stationary internal combustion engine, particularly as part of a genset for the production of electrical energy.
Exemplary embodiments of the disclosure will be explained with reference to the figures. The figures show:
If the maximum permitted differential pressure Δpmax is exceeded, the air filter must be changed. This also applies when the minimum permitted differential pressure drops below, since generally there is a defective air filter then.
Here follows the description of a typical aging process of an air filter based on the diagram in
If the operating conditions since the first measurement have changed (which here is noticeable in an increased volume flow V2), then the second measured differential pressure Δp2′ will have a different distance to the maximum permitted differential pressure Δpmax. Again, it can now be estimated how much time remains until the maximum permitted differential pressure Δpmax is reached (for example, by linear extrapolation) even though the operating conditions have changed.
Based on the calculated actual present air flow and a maximum permitted differential pressure (Δpmax) adjusted via the actual present air flow, the load condition and/or the remaining operating time of the air filter (3), particularly in a partial-load operation, of the internal combustion engine can be estimated.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
A51107/2015 | Dec 2015 | AT | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/AT2016/060119 | 12/7/2016 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2017/112965 | 7/6/2017 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5604306 | Schricker | Feb 1997 | A |
5606311 | Polidan et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
8534123 | Herman et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8626456 | Moore et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
9061224 | Verdegan et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
1016320 | Kopecek et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
10323599 | Dudar | Jun 2019 | B2 |
10598136 | Naruse | Mar 2020 | B2 |
20030221480 | Aschner | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20080190177 | Wiggins et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20110067678 | Burkhardt et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110197580 | Andrasko | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110238331 | Moore et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110307160 | Verdegan et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110308308 | Herman et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120317974 | Rollinger | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130036804 | Uehara | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20150233312 | Kopecek et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20170067769 | Steinert | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170096974 | Dudar | Apr 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19630985 | Mar 1997 | DE |
102008025549 | Dec 2009 | DE |
10 2012 208 601 | Dec 2012 | DE |
102011014412 | Dec 2012 | DE |
2910755 | Aug 2015 | EP |
2012077438 | Jun 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
First Office Action issued in connection with corresponding AT Application No. A51107/2015 dated Jun. 24, 2016 (English Translation Not Available). |
European Communication pursuant to Art 94 (3) EPC for EP Application No. 16822880.7 dated Mar. 24, 2020; 6 pgs. |
PCT Preliminary Report & International Search Report and Written Opinion; Application No. PCT/AT2016/060119; dated Jul. 3, 2018; 6 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190072045 A1 | Mar 2019 | US |