The invention relates to a method and a device for securing the gate closure plane of a gate or other closure member which closes an opening by being displaced in a vertical or horizontal plane.
It is a generally known fact of automatically operated gates or doors that safety precautions must be taken in order to prevent obstructing objects or persons from being struck by the moving gate closure edge, and to prevent the possibility of ensuing damage or injury.
To this end, it has been known to arrange at the bordering edge of automatically operated gates or doors touch-sensitive edge safety means which deactivate the gate or door drive mechanism upon occurrence of a counter force (detection of an obstacle) or even effect a “yielding action” in the sense of reversing the direction of displacement.
Another known solution affording this protection consists in the provision of photoelectric barriers or of light grids consisting of a multiplicity of photoelectric barriers closely in front of and behind the gate closure plane, to thus create a safety light curtain on either side of the gate edge.
EP 0 902 158 discloses a very advantageous system to this effect wherein it is provided to sequentially disregard particular photoelectric barriers, with the consequence that operation with only one light grid inside the very gate closure plane is made possible.
Another securing option is to provide above the gate or door aperture sensors each creating, closely in front of the gate closure plane, a safety field which reaches down to the ground and may furthermore possess a three-dimensional extension in the direction of depth. Infrared or ultrasonic sensors as well as radar sensors are customarily used for this purpose.
Another possibility consists in performing detection as early as into the approach area of the gate aperture, to thus recognize the approach of objects or persons. A safe, advantageous method in this regard is disclosed by EP 1 470 314.
The drawback of systems involving physical contact—i.e., systems responding to contact with an object—resides in the circumstance that contact will in any case be established before the sensor can effect a deactivation or the reversal of the direction of displacement of the gate drive mechanism. In a given case, this may at least result in light injuries or damages.
Solutions including photoelectric barriers and light grids present the drawback that failures will occur due to influence of external light, dirt, or inaccurate mounting. The constructive complexity is high when considering the fact that at least two system components, i.e., transmitters and receivers of a light grid system, have to be provided. If one assumes the installation of light grids in front of and behind the gate/door casement, it is thus necessary to install four components. With this solution there moreover remains a non-secured area in front of the gate edge.
The solution described in EP 1 470 314 aims at securing the approach area and may involve high complexity. Depending on the installation, safety gaps which may only be covered with the aid of two sensor systems are created in front of the gate closure plane. Securing of the gate closure plane is not the primary aim, and accordingly the area of the gate closure plane is not covered entirely.
It is an object of the invention to furnish a method having the features of the preamble of annexed claim 1, which avoids the high technical complexity required for the installation of transmitters and receivers of a comparatively large number of photoelectric barriers in order to form a light grid or light curtain within the gate closure plane, and which avoids the drawbacks that might possibly occur due to the movement of the gate leaf in the associated guide means past the transmitters and receivers and immediately in front of the pickup areas of the transmitters and receivers.
In accordance with the invention, this object is attained through the characterizing features of claim 1.
The invention also relates to a device for implementing the method according to claim 1. Advantageous configurations and developments are subject matter of the method subclaims and device subclaims.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of a device for implementing the presently specified method, the distance scanning detector generating the distance detector beam is a scanning laser which directs a highly directional light beam at the leading gate edge and at a lateral boundary of the gate aperture, wherein it causes comparatively little difficulty to focus the scanning beam to such a degree that it will reliably impact on the leading gate edge within the tolerance limits imposed by operation of the gate, and the reflected signals of the distance scanning detector may be utilized with a high degree of accuracy for an evaluation of its propagation period measurement.
Here it should be noted expressly that the closure member to be monitored and controlled discussed in the following description and in the claims predominantly as a is a gate which mainly moves into the closure position in the vertical direction. The invention does, however, also encompass horizontally displaced gates, fences, construction site covers, swimming pool covers, loading hatch closures of cargo ships, and the like.
In the following, the invention shall be explained in more detail by way of practical examples while making reference to the enclosed drawings, wherein:
If an obstructing object 8 is moving toward the gate aperture 4 while the segmented gate 1 is being closed, the closing movement of the gate 1 has to be stopped by deactivating the drive mechanism 7, or in a given case by reversing the drive mechanism, so that the lower or leading gate edge 9 will not strike against the obstructing object 8 and cause damage to it or be damaged by the obstructing object 8.
When an obstructing object 8 appears, an alarm signal triggering the deactivation or/and reversal is supplied to the drive motor 7 of the segmented rolling shutter gate 1 via a line 10. This alarm signal is generated by a monitoring control means of the distance scanning detector, independently of any control means whereby, e.g., an operator activates or deactivates the drive mechanism 7 through the intermediary of the gate control, which shall be discussed in detail in the following.
In proximity of the lower corner of the gate aperture 4, i.e., in proximity of the one corner of the rectangle of the gate aperture 4 which is situated in the vicinity of the lower or leading gate edge 9 with regard to the downward movement of the leading gate edge in its closure position, there is provided a distance scanning detector including a number of different components, the entirety of which is designated by 12.
In the preferred practical example, the distance scanning detector i.a. contains a laser transmitter and receiver unit, the transmitted and received beams of which are radially deflected across a range of at least 90 deg. by means of a deflection mechanism preferably realized by a rotating mirror. The deflection mechanism is driven by a drive motor, with the instantaneous position of the deflection mirror being detected continuously upon emission and reception of a sensor signal. A control unit is supplied with the resulting values for propagation period measurement and angular position of the mirror, thus allowing the formation of pairs of values consisting of propagation period and direction of the beam.
Here it shall be assumed for the purpose of illustration of a practical example that the rotary mirror rotates clockwise, such that in the case of a scanning range of 0 to 90 deg. presently of interest, the distance measurement detector beam is initially pointed upwards and will then have a horizontal orientation at the end of this scanning range, as is shown in
In detail, at the beginning of a scanning cycle, i.e., at a scanning angle α of 0 deg., the distance scanning detector 12 signals to the monitoring control means a distance h until impact of the distance measurement detector beam, which means the height of the leading gate edge 9 above zero being detected at this instant, whereas at the end of the scanning cycle, when the scanning angle α assumes a value of 90 deg., the distance scanning detector 12 signals to the monitoring control means a distance r which does, of course, correspond to the width b of the gate aperture as may be seen in
The dependencies of the distance data r supplied by the distance scanning detector 12 are determined differently in portions of one scanning cycle across 90 deg., namely, in the following manner. During the movement of the leading gate edge 9 in the closing direction, the distance measurement values r change from scanning cycle to scanning cycle in accordance with diminishing height values h, in which they obey respective different characteristic curves. On the other hand, when at intermediate values of the scanning angle α the distance measurement detector beam finally impacts on the lateral boundary or on the guide member 6, a same characteristic curve will then be valid for the distance measurement value r from scan to scan; this is made clear in
In the diagram of measurement values r, the dash-dotted line 20 in
whereas a set of characteristic curves having the functions
applies to the distance measurement detector beam impacting on the leading or lower gate edge 9, with h being a time-dependent quantity.
Without entering into a more detailed mathematical representation which may readily be reproduced by a person having skill in the art, it can at any rate be noted by referring to
drawn as solid lines in
As soon, however, as it is not possible any more to disregard the lowering velocity of the rolling shutter gate 1 in comparison with the scanning velocity, or the angular velocity of the distance detector beam, then the characteristic curves
undergo a downward shift during each scanning cycle in accordance with the broken lines 22 drawn in
Under consideration of all relevant pairs of values, the respective position of the gate closure edge results in respective constant values for the gate position h′, namely,
h′=r1 cos α1=r2 cos α2= . . . =rn cos αn.
When the distance scanning detector 12 inputs distance measurement values to the monitoring control means, which distance measurement values are then compared to distance limit values stocked in storage means in accordance with the reflections carried out in the foregoing with regard to
On the other hand, whenever a somewhat unexpected lower distance measurement value is signalled by the distance scanning detector 12 at a particular angular position of the distance measurement detector beam, this indicates an impact of the distance measurement detector beam on an obstacle 8 having intruded into the gate aperture 4 during the closing movement of the gate. This conclusion is valid both for the scan phase during which the distance measurement detector beam impacts on the leading or lower gate edge 9 and for that part of a scanning cycle during which the distance measurement detector beam impacts on the lateral boundary 6 of the gate aperture 4.
In the presently specified system it is thus possible, with the aid of a single distance measurement means disposed in a corner of a rectangular gate aperture and detecting a 90-degree scan area within the gate closure plane, to monitor the entire gate closure plane without having to set up a light grid consisting of a multiplicity of photoelectric barriers across this gate closure plane.
If the drive mechanism 7 for the gate 1 is configured such that a constant closing velocity of the leading gate edge 9 can be assumed, then consecutive automatic switching of the stocked distance limit values from characteristic curve 21 to characteristic curve 21, or from characteristic curve 22 to characteristic curve 23 (the latter for the case of comparatively slow scanning by the distance scanning detector 12), may be provided in the monitoring control means.
In accordance with an advantageous development of the presently specified system it is, however, also possible to perform a respective velocity measurement with regard to the closing velocity of the leading or lower gate edge 9 with the aid of the distance measurement detector beam and the distance scanning detector 12 in so combination with the monitoring control means itself, in which case consecutive measurement values for the scanning angle α=0 (namely, r=h) of consecutive scanning cycles are evaluated; cf. the practical example according to
Independently of an accurate mathematical determination of the respective distance limit values to be stocked in storage means, these may also be obtained by performing initialization runs of the gate 1 in closing movement, during which initialization runs the distance measurement values determined at a respective angular scanning velocity are gathered and stored in the storage means, with these storage means then being addressed, during operation, in dependence on the respective gate position measured by the distance scanning detector, and in a given case also in dependence on the determined gate velocity, in order to retrieve the distance limit values for the comparison with the respective distance measurement values.
In the embodiment of
If, in accordance with
The embodiment of
It should be noted, however, that the position of the plane of the rectangular gate aperture adapted to be closed by the presently specified system is not restricted to a vertical plane, as is illustrated in
Instead of accurate geometrical considerations for the purpose of determining the stocked distance limit values to be compared to the distance measurement values actually determined based on the distance measurement detector beam, it may be expedient in all of the embodiments described in the foregoing to guide the distance measurement detector beam through repeated scanning cycles along a leading gate edge and along a lateral boundary of the gate guide means, and in the process to gather respective distance measurement values which are then stored into a storage as distance measurement limit values at a certain tolerance. During scanning of the leading gate edge and based on appropriate addressing, this storage will then furnish—depending on a possibly predetermined, constant gate closure velocity, or depending on a gate closure velocity determined from scanning cycle to scanning cycle, or depending on a gate velocity determined temporarily at the beginning of a scanning cycle—precisely those limit values of the length of the distance measurement scanning beam which indicate an obstructing object if they are not attained, and bring about a deactivation or/and a reversal of the motor drive of the gate leaf or gate. During a scan of the distance measurement detector beam along the lateral straight guidance of the gate, the stocked limit values remain unchanged over the one portion of the characteristic curve 20 of
As the scanning velocity or angular velocity of the distance scanning detector 12 may be extraordinarily high, such that the closing gate may be considered to be stationary during one scanning pass of the distance scanning detector 12, and thus the leading gate edge may be considered to be assuming a certain elevational position h, h1, h2, etc. during one pass, it is quite possible to already perform the trigonometric processing of the determined quantities r in the distance scanning detector 12 and then compare them to constant limit values.
While the detector beam scans the lower gate edge being situated at a particular height, the constant value h will always result by multiplication of the value for r as determined by the distance scanning detector and the instantaneous scanning angle upon counter-clockwise scanning by multiplication of r cos α.
When the scanning beam then impacts on the corner between the leading gate edge and the boundary of the gate aperture opposite the distance scanning detector, the diagram plane valid for the ensuing calculation of limit value is the diagram plane SF which is drawn in
Here it is true for the detector beam, the length of which is multiplied with the scanning angle cos α, that the result will always be the quantity b, which applies from impact of the detector beam on the corner between the leading gate edge and the lateral gate aperture boundary to when the detector beam is oriented in a horizontal direction.
Thus, whenever the detector beam impacts on the corner between leading gate edge and lateral boundary of the gate aperture, it is necessary to change over the view from diagram plane TK to diagram plane SF, as is indicated by arcuate arrows W1, W2 and W3 in
By means of corresponding multiplication rules in the distance scanning detector in dependence on the respective instantaneous height of the leading gate edge it is achieved that the limit value to be stocked and to which an evaluation result of the distance measurement is compared, is a constant.
Lastly it should be noted that the presently specified teaching may also be employed by embodiments where two gate leaves approach each other symmetrically, such that the distance scanning apparatus is located in proximity of the meeting point of the two gate leaves and then executes a scanning range of the scanning beam across 180° in a correspondingly modified embodiment. Such developed embodiments are considered to be encompassed by the annexed claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2007 050 334.4 | Oct 2007 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP08/06376 | 8/1/2008 | WO | 00 | 4/19/2010 |