The technical subject matter relates generally to high speed envelope transport and packing systems and, more specifically, to a method and device for controlling an envelope flap during packing.
As schematically illustrated in
A typical envelope 4 of the type used in an envelope packing system is illustrated in
As used herein, a flap-closed configuration occurs when the flap 8 of the envelope 4 is folded along the connecting edge 10 and resting over the envelope body 6. In a flap-open configuration, the flap 8 of the envelope 4 is rotated away from the envelope body 6. Because envelopes are typically sold in a flap-closed configuration for packaging and shipping efficiency, many conventional envelope packing systems are configured to accept envelopes in the flap-closed configuration. As part of the packing process, a flap opening means rotates the flap 8 of the envelope 4 from the flap-closed configuration to the flap-open configuration.
One type of flap opening means uses a jet of air directed towards the flap 8 to rotate the flap into the flap-open configuration. The envelope flap 8, although held in the flap-open configuration by the flap opening means, retains a bias to return to the flap-closed configuration due the crease in the envelope running along the connecting edge 10 of the envelope body 6. However, when the envelope is introduced into a conveyor for subsequent processing and after the connecting edge 10 of the envelope body 6 passes between various feeding mechanisms, such as rollers, the crease in the envelope 4 is substantially flattened, which tends to bias the envelope flap 8 towards the flap-open configuration.
Once the envelope 4 has been conveyed to the packing phase of the envelope packing system, controlling the location of the envelope flap 8 is important to prevent the flap from interfering with the packing of the insert into the envelope body. For example, if the insert contacts the envelope flap during packing, the insert may catch on the flap and cause fouling of the system. Current envelope packing systems control the flap by covering the flap with a flap control feature, such as a plate, finger, or guide, during the packing phase. However, mechanical hold-downs interfere with smooth transition of the insert material into the envelope. In addition, the varying nature of envelope styles and sizes results in limited success when applying a mechanical hold-down mechanism.
A problem associated with these types of flap control features, however, is these conventional flap control features can interfere with other portions of the envelope packing system. For example, in a continuous envelope packing system in which the envelope remains moving during the packing phase, conventional flap control features cannot cover the flap at all times for all types of envelope sizes and construction types without interfering with other portions of the envelope packing system. Furthermore, although the crease in the envelope has been substantially flattened, the envelope may still retain a bias to return to the flap-closed configuration, and if this occurs, the flap may prevent a pusher mechanism from packing the insert into the envelope body. Accordingly, a needs exists for a device and method for improved control of a flap on an envelope that minimizes interference with other portions of the envelope packing system.
This and other needs are met, for example, by a high-speed envelope transport and packing system comprising a conveyor for conveying an open envelope having a flap, a packing station for inserting an object into a conveyed open envelope, and a bending member disposed upstream of the packing station. The bending member is configured to impart a bend in a conveyed open envelope by displacing a center portion of the open envelope relative to widthwise distal end portions of the conveyed open envelope and to maintain a bend in a conveyed open envelope until the open envelope is gripped by a gripping device in such a manner as to provide access to an interior of the open envelope or until an object is at least partially inserted into an interior of the open envelope.
In another aspect, a high-speed envelope transport and packing system in accord with the present disclosure comprises a bending member configured to bend a conveyed envelope about the z-axis during conveyance of the conveyed envelope to increase the moment of inertia of the conveyed envelope about the z-axis above a corresponding moment of inertia of the conveyed envelope in a flat state.
In still another aspect, a high-speed envelope transport and packing system comprises a conveyor for conveying an open envelope having a flap, a packing station for inserting an object into a conveyed open envelope, and a vacuum plate provided in the packing station. The vacuum plate is configured to slidingly secure an envelope and an envelope flap against the vacuum plate, at least during insertion of an object into the conveyed open envelope.
In yet another aspect, a high-speed envelope transport and packing system comprises a conveyor for continuously conveying a plurality of open envelopes, a packing station for inserting an object into a respective one of the plurality of continuously conveyed open envelopes, and a vacuum plate provided in the packing station. The vacuum plate is configured to slidingly secure the plurality of continuously conveyed open envelopes including envelope flaps thereof against the vacuum plate at least during insertion of an object into each of the continuously conveyed open envelopes.
In still another aspect, a high-speed envelope transport and packing system comprises a conveyor for continuously conveying a plurality of open envelopes, a packing station for inserting an object into a respective one of the plurality of continuously conveyed open envelopes, and a means for controlling a flap of each of the continuously conveyed open envelopes during insertion of an object into each of the envelopes in the packing station.
Additional advantages will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description, wherein only an exemplary embodiment is shown and described, simply by way of illustration. As will be realized, the disclosed technology is capable of other and different embodiments, and its several details are capable of modifications in various obvious respects. Accordingly, the drawings and description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature, and not as restrictive.
Reference is made to the attached drawings, wherein elements having the same reference numeral designations represent like elements throughout, and wherein:
b are perspectives of manifolds in accord with the present concepts.
The present subject matter improves control of a flap on an envelope in an envelope packing or inserting system by bending the envelope about an axis that is substantially perpendicular to a connecting edge between the flap and an envelope body of the envelope.
The term “moment of inertia” (or second moment) refers to a characteristic of a body that represents that body's resistance to bending. The equation used to calculate the moment of inertia for a body with respect to a particular axis is given as follows:
Ix is moment of inertia about an x-axis, dA is an area of an element, and y is a perpendicular distance of dA from axis X.
When the envelope 4 is bent (either up or down) about a z-axis (not shown, but which is perpendicular with the page illustrating
As a result of this greater moment of inertia Ix along the x-axis, the envelope that is bent about the z-axis has a greater ability to resist bending about the x-axis than that of the flat envelope. As the x-axis illustrated in
Although not limited in this manner, the direction of travel of the envelope through the envelope packing system is generally substantially perpendicular to the connecting edge of the envelope. As such, the axis about which the envelope is bent to control the flap is generally substantially parallel to the direction of travel of the envelope through the envelope packing system.
As previously discussed, the control of the flap of the envelope can be improved by bending the envelope either upward or downward, and the envelope packing system is not limited in the manner in which the bending is accomplished. For example, as illustrated
In a certain embodiment of the envelope packing system, as illustrated in
The conveyor 50 depicted in
In a continuous motion mail inserting system, the envelope and the insertion materials are in simultaneous, same direction motion during insertion of the insertion materials. For example, the insertion materials may be disposed to travel in the same direction as the open envelope 4 with the open end of the envelope facing the downstream side. The insertion materials are given a velocity slightly greater than that of the envelope to enable the insertion materials to overtake the open envelope. To ensure proper packing of insertion materials in the envelope 4, a slight force in a direction opposite to the direction of travel of the envelope 4 can be provided across the full length of the conveyor 50 to counterbalance the force generated by the packing of the insert material into the envelope 8. This slight force may be generated by frictional forces, which may be enhanced by the use of vacuum ports 60. Thus, in addition to simply retaining envelope 4 against the conveyor 50, the vacuum ports 60 can also provide or contribute to the desired counterbalancing force in a direction opposite to the direction of travel of the envelope 6 by increasing a frictional force generated between the envelope 4 and the conveyor 50.
The conveyor 50 is not limited as to the height above the surface of the conveyor 50 that the rail 54 extends. For example, tests have shown that the rail 54 can have a height of up to 5.0 mm above the surface of the conveyor 50. However, increasing the height of the rail 54 makes it more difficult to open the envelope opening 16 during the insertion process. It has been found that a range of height from about 1.25 mm to about 1.75 mm provides a good balance between controlling the flap 8 and opening the envelope opening 16, and in certain aspects of the envelope packing system, the height of the rail 54 can be set to about 1.5 mm.
The envelope packing system is not limited as to the size, number, or pattern of vacuum ports 60 located in the conveyor 50. For example, depending upon the type of envelope to be packed, the size, number, and/or pattern of vacuum ports 60 to be used may vary. As such, a single envelope packing system may be limited to only a certain type of envelope. Alternatively, the envelope packing system may include a conveyor 50 having vacuum ports 60 that are adjustable as to size, number, and/or pattern of ports.
As illustrated in
The plate of
The envelope packing system is also not limited as to the manner in which the vacuum ports 60 can be adjusted as to size, shape, number, and/or pattern of ports. For example, the conveyor 50 can include a sufficient number of vacuum ports 60 capable of reproducing all desired numbers and/or patterns of desired vacuum ports 60. The vacuum ports 60 can the be controlled individually or in combination, for example, by a system of valves, to open or close the vacuum ports 60. By selectively controlling the valves, any desired number and/or pattern of active vacuum ports 60 can be obtained. Furthermore, the size and/or shape of the vacuum ports 60 can be modified, for example, with inserts than can be placed inside the vacuum ports 60. Each insert can have a different size and/or shape of hole than the vacuum port 60 into which the insert is placed thereby changing the size and/or shape of the vacuum port 60.
Another example in which the size, shape, number, and/or pattern of vacuum ports 60 can be modified using removable manifolds is illustrated in
If a manifold 62 includes a plate 64, the envelope packing system is not limited as to particular manner in which the plate 64 is secured to the manifold 62. For example, the plate 64 and the manifold 62 can be secured together using a magnetic connection. As another example, the plate 64 and the manifold 62 can be secured together using screws 66. Although not limited in this manner, each manifold 62 can include a separate channel/hose 68 that fluidly connects the vacuum ports of the manifold 62 to a vacuum source via a central opening 65 connected to channels 67 in the manifold 62 adjacent the vacuum ports 60. Alternatively, each manifold 62 can share a connection to the vacuum source.
An example of manifolds 70 according to one aspect of the envelope packing system is illustrated in
The present concepts can be practiced by employing conventional materials, methodology and equipment. Accordingly, the details of such materials, equipment and methodology are not set forth herein in detail. In the previous descriptions, numerous specific details are set forth, such as specific materials, structures, chemicals, processes, etc., in order to provide a thorough understanding. However, it should be recognized that the concepts outlined above can be practiced without resorting to the details specifically set forth. In other instances, well known processing structures have not been described in detail, in order not to unnecessarily obscure the present concept. It is to be understood that the present concepts are capable of application in various other combinations and environments and are capable of changes or modifications within the scope of the inventive concept as expressed herein.
This application claims priority from and is related to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/462,320, filed Apr. 14, 2003, entitled “METHOD AND DEVICE FOR CONTROLLING ENVELOPE FLAP DURING INSERTION”, by inventors Bradford D. Henry et al. The contents of the provisional application are hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2001009 | Baker et al. | May 1935 | A |
2746221 | Rouan et al. | May 1956 | A |
3935800 | Sette et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
3974749 | Luperti et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4020615 | Irvine et al. | May 1977 | A |
4333300 | Russell | Jun 1982 | A |
4499705 | Russell | Feb 1985 | A |
4525986 | Noll | Jul 1985 | A |
4527378 | Russell | Jul 1985 | A |
4781013 | DePasquale et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4798040 | Haas et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
5156585 | Dimur et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5457941 | Long et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5487254 | Dronsfield | Jan 1996 | A |
5560185 | Petkovsek | Oct 1996 | A |
5675959 | Hamma et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5715648 | Yates | Feb 1998 | A |
5911668 | Auerbach et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5992132 | Auerbach | Nov 1999 | A |
6293076 | Miller et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6453651 | Werner | Sep 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 219 455 | Jul 2002 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050050862 A1 | Mar 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60462320 | Apr 2003 | US |