The invention relates to a method and device for monitoring an implant, and in particular to a method and device for correcting luminescent signals emitted from the implant.
The monitoring of the level of analyte, such as glucose, lactate or oxygen, in certain individuals is important to their health. High or low levels of glucose, or other analytes, may have detrimental effects or be indicative of specific health states. The monitoring of glucose is particularly important to individuals with diabetes, a subset of whom must determine when insulin is needed to reduce glucose levels in their bodies or when additional glucose is needed to raise the level of glucose in their bodies.
A conventional technique used by many individuals with diabetes for personally monitoring their blood glucose level includes the periodic drawing of blood, the application of that blood to a test strip, and the determination of the blood glucose level using calorimetric, electrochemical, or photometric detection. This technique does not permit continuous or automatic monitoring of glucose levels in the body, but typically must be performed manually on a periodic basis. Unfortunately, the consistency with which the level of glucose is checked varies widely among individuals. Many people with diabetes find the periodic testing inconvenient, and they sometimes forget to test their glucose level or do not have time for a proper test. In addition, some individuals wish to avoid the pain associated with the test. Unmonitored glucose may result in hyperglycemic or hypoglycemic episodes. An implanted sensor that monitors the individual's analyte levels would enable individuals to monitor their glucose, or other analyte levels, more easily.
A variety of devices have been developed for monitoring of analytes (e.g., glucose) in the blood stream or interstitial fluid of various tissues. A number of these devices use sensors that are inserted into a blood vessel or under the skin of a patient. These implanted sensors are often difficult to read or to monitor optically, because of low levels of florescence in the presence of high scatter due to dynamic changes in skin conditions (e.g., blood level and hydration). The skin is highly scattering, and the scattering may dominate the optical propagation. Scatter is caused by index of refraction changes in the tissue, and the main components of scatter in the skin are due to lipids, collagen, and other biological components. The main absorption is caused by blood, melanin, water, and other components.
One device, disclosed in published US patent application 20090221891 to Yu, includes components of an assay for glucose. An optical signal is read out transcutaneously by external optics when the sensor is implanted in vivo. A fluorimeter separately measures, for a donor chromophore and an acceptor chromophore, an excitation light intensity, an ambient light intensity, and an intensity of combined luminescent and ambient light. Measurements are taken by holding the fluorimeter close to the skin and in alignment with the sensor. The final output provided is the normalized ratio between the luminescent intensity from the two fluorophores, which may be converted to analyte concentration using calibration data. A calibration curve is established empirically by measuring response versus glucose concentration. Although this device provides some light signal correction, it may still be difficult to obtain accurate readings due to dynamic skin changes that cause optical scattering and absorption of light emitted from the implant.
US patent application 20110028806 to Merritt discloses another procedure and system for measuring blood glucose levels. A set of photodiodes detects the luminescence and reflectance of light energy emitted from one or more emitters, such as LEDs, into a patient's skin. Small molecule metabolite reporters (SMMRs) that bind to glucose are introduced to tissue of the stratum corneum and the epidermis to provide more easily detected luminescence. The test results are calibrated with a reflectance intensity measurement taken at approximately the excitation wavelength. In addition, the method includes measuring a second luminescence and reflectance intensity to normalize data from the first set of measurements. First luminescence and reflectance intensity measurements are taken at a site treated with an SMMR. Second luminescence and reflectance intensity measurements are taken at an untreated, background site. The background measurement is then used to correct for the background tissue luminescence and absorption through a wavelength normalization. Although this method provides some light signal correction for background luminescence and reflectance, it may still be difficult to obtain accurate and/or consistent glucose readings from glucose-binding molecules in the epidermis.
There is still a need for a small, compact device that can accurately and consistently monitor an implanted sensor and provide signals to an analyzer without substantially restricting the movements and activities of a patient. Continuous and/or automatic monitoring of the analyte can provide a warning to the patient when the level of the analyte is at or near a threshold level. For example, if glucose is the analyte, then the monitoring device might be configured to warn the patient of current or impending hyperglycemia or hypoglycemia. The patient can then take appropriate actions.
According to one aspect, a method is provided for correcting at least one analyte-dependent optical signal emitted from an implant. The implant is typically embedded in tissue of a mammalian body. The implant is capable of emitting, in response to excitation light within an excitation wavelength range, the analyte-dependent optical signal within an emission wavelength range. The method comprises transmitting first excitation light within the excitation wavelength range through the tissue to the implant and measuring a first optical signal emitted from the tissue, within the emission wavelength range, in response to the first excitation light. The method also comprises transmitting second excitation light within the emission wavelength range into the tissue and measuring a second optical signal emitted from the tissue, within the emission wavelength range, in response to the second excitation light. At least one corrected signal value is calculated in dependence upon the measured signals.
According to another aspect, an optical detection device is provided for monitoring an implant embedded in tissue of a mammalian body. The implant is capable of emitting, in response to excitation light within an excitation wavelength range, at least one analyte-dependent optical signal within an emission wavelength range. The device comprises a first light source arranged to transmit first excitation light within the excitation wavelength range through the tissue to the implant. A second light source is arranged to transmit second excitation light within the emission wavelength range into the tissue. At least one detector is arranged to measure, in response to the first excitation light, a first optical signal emitted from the tissue in the emission wavelength range and arranged to measure, in response to the second excitation light, a second optical signal emitted from the tissue in the emission wavelength range.
According to another aspect, a method is provided for correcting at least one analyte-dependent optical signal emitted from an implant embedded in tissue of a mammalian body. The implant is capable of emitting, in response to excitation light within an excitation wavelength range, the analyte-dependent optical signal within an emission wavelength range. The method comprises transmitting first excitation light within the excitation wavelength range through the tissue to the implant and measuring a first optical signal emitted from the tissue, within the emission wavelength range, in response to the first excitation light. The method also comprises transmitting second excitation light within the excitation wavelength range into the tissue and measuring a second optical signal emitted from the tissue, within the emission wavelength range, in response to the second excitation light. The second excitation light and the light emitted in response to the second excitation light form a light path that is spaced laterally from the implant a sufficient distance to avoid significant contribution from implant reporters (e.g., luminescent, luminescent, bioluminescent, or phosphorescent reporters). At least one corrected signal value is calculated in dependence upon the measured optical signals.
According to another aspect, an optical detection device is provided for monitoring an implant embedded in tissue of a mammalian body. The implant is capable of emitting, in response to excitation light within an excitation wavelength range, at least one analyte-dependent optical signal within an emission wavelength range. The device comprises a first light source arranged to transmit first excitation light in the excitation wavelength range through the tissue to the implant. A first detector is arranged to measure, in response to the first excitation light, a first optical signal emitted from the tissue in the emission wavelength range. A second light source is arranged to transmit second excitation light within the excitation wavelength range into the tissue. A second detector is arranged to measure, in response to the second excitation light, a second optical emitted from the tissue in the emission wavelength range. The second light source and the second detector are positioned with respect to each other such that the second excitation light and the light emitted in response to the second excitation light form a light path that is spaced laterally from the implant a sufficient distance to avoid significant contribution from implant reporters.
The foregoing aspects and advantages of the present invention will become better understood upon reading the following detailed description and upon reference to the drawings where:
In the following description, it is understood that all recited connections between structures can be direct operative connections or indirect operative connections through intermediary structures. A set of elements includes one or more elements. Any recitation of an element is understood to refer to at least one element. A plurality of elements includes at least two elements. Unless otherwise required, any described method steps need not be necessarily performed in a particular illustrated order. A first element (e.g. data) derived from a second element encompasses a first element equal to the second element, as well as a first element generated by processing the second element and optionally other data. Making a determination or decision according to a parameter encompasses making the determination or decision according to the parameter and optionally according to other data. Unless otherwise specified, an indicator of some quantity/data may be the quantity/data itself, or an indicator different from the quantity/data itself. Computer programs described in some embodiments of the present invention may be stand-alone software entities or sub-entities (e.g., subroutines, code objects) of other computer programs. Computer readable media encompass non-transitory media such as magnetic, optic, and semiconductor storage media (e.g. hard drives, optical disks, flash memory, DRAM), as well as communications links such as conductive cables and fiber optic links According to some embodiments, the present invention provides, inter alia, computer systems comprising hardware (e.g. one or more processors and associated memory) programmed to perform the methods described herein, as well as computer-readable media encoding instructions to perform the methods described herein.
The following description illustrates embodiments of the invention by way of example and not necessarily by way of limitation.
The implant 12 is capable of emitting, in response to excitation light within an excitation wavelength range, at least one analyte-dependent optical signal within an emission wavelength range. The analyte may comprise, for example, glucose or other analytes in the body of the individual. Suitable optical signals include, but are not limited, to luminescent, luminescent, bioluminescent, phosphorescent, autoluminescence, and diffuse reflectance signals. In preferred embodiments, the implant 12 contains one or more luminescent dyes whose luminescence emission intensity varies in dependence upon the amount or presence of target analyte in the body of the individual.
A first light source 16 is arranged to transmit first excitation light within the excitation wavelength range from the surface of the skin 14 to the implant 12. A second light source 18 is arranged to transmit second excitation light from the surface of the skin 14 into the tissue 15. The second excitation light is preferably within the emission wavelength range of the analyte-dependent luminescent signal (e.g., the emission peak). Suitable light sources include, without limitation, lasers, semi-conductor lasers, light emitting diodes (LEDs), organic LEDs.
At least one detector, and more preferably at least two detectors 20, 22 are arranged with the light sources 16, 18. The first detector 20 is positioned to measure, in response to the first excitation light from the first light source 16, a first optical signal (e.g., the intensity of light) emitted at the surface of the skin 14 within the emission wavelength range. The detector 20 is also arranged to measure, in response to the second excitation light, a second optical signal emitted from the tissue 15 through the surface of the skin 14 within the emission wavelength range. Suitable detectors include, without limitation, photodiodes or CCDs. Although multiple detectors are preferred for some embodiments, one could use a single universal detector. The detectors 20, 22 are preferably filtered (e.g., dichroic filters or other suitable filters) to measure the optical signals emitted within respective wavelength ranges. In this example, a suitable luminescent dye sensitive to glucose concentration is Alexa 647 responsive to excitation light (absorption) in the range of about 600 to 650 nm (absorption peak 647 nm) and within an emission wavelength range of about 670 to 750 nm with an emission peak of about 680 nm.
In the operation of device 10, an analyte-dependent luminescent signal emitted from the implant 12 is corrected for diffuse reflectance and/or autofluorescence. The light source 16 is activated to transmit first excitation light within the excitation wavelength range from the surface of the skin 14 to the implant 12. The first detector 20 measures, in response to the first excitation light, a first optical signal emitted from the tissue 15 at the surface of the skin 14 within the emission wavelength range, as represented by a first light path 24 from the light source 16 to the implant 12 to the first detector 20. The light path 24 provides the primary analyte-dependent optical signal. The second light source 18 is activated to transmit second excitation light from the surface of the skin 14 to a second depth in the tissue 15 under the surface of the skin 14. The second excitation light is substantially within the emission wavelength range (e.g., the emission peak) of the analyte-dependent luminescent signal. The first detector 20 measures, in response to the second excitation light, a second optical signal emitted from the tissue 15 through the surface of the skin 14 within the emission wavelength range, as represented by a second light path 26.
The second optical signal may be used as a reference signal to correct the primary analyte-dependent optical signal for diffuse reflectance or scattering of light in the tissue 15. In some embodiments, the second depth to which the light path 26 extends below the surface of the skin 14 may be substantially equal to the first depth at which the implant 12 is embedded (e.g., in the subcutaneous tissue at a depth of 1 to 5 mm under the surface of the skin 14). In some embodiments, the light path 26 for the second optical signal extends to a depth greater than or equal to 2 mm under the surface of the skin 14, and in other embodiments the light path 26 for the second optical signal extends to a depth greater than or equal to 4 mm under the surface of the skin.
An additional correction factor may optionally be obtained by activating the first light source 16 to transmit third excitation light, within the excitation wavelength range, from the surface of the skin 14 to a third depth in the tissue 15. In some embodiments, the third depth may differ from the first and second depths, and the third depth may be in the range of 1 to 5 mm under the surface of the skin 14. The second detector 22 measures a third optical signal emitted from the tissue 15 through the surface of the skin 14 within the excitation wavelength range in response to the third excitation light, as represented by a third light path 28. At least one corrected signal value is calculated in dependence upon the measured optical signals. In one example, the primary analyte-dependent signal from the implant may be corrected as:
Corrected Signal=S(LS1,D1)*C(LS2,D1)*C(LS1,D2) (1)
In equation (1) above, the term S(LS1, D1) represents the first optical signal, which is the primary analyte-dependent optical signal measured from the first light path 24 from the first light source 16 to the implant 12 to the first detector 20. The term C(LS2, D1) represents the second optical signal, which is a correction factor signal measured from the second light path 26 from the second light source 18 to the first detector 20. The term C(LS1, D2) represents an optional third optical signal, which is an additional correction factor signal measured from the third light path 28 from the first light source 16 to the second detector 22.
Thus, the primary analyte-dependent optical signal emitted from the implant 12 may be corrected for diffuse reflectance or scattering within the emission wavelength range of the analyte-dependent optical signal, to account for optical scattering or absorption of the signal in the tissue 15. The analyte-dependent optical signal may optionally be corrected for scattering, reflectance or attenuation in the excitation wavelength range to account for dynamic changes in skin properties. One advantage of correcting the analyte-dependent signal by one or more reference signals is that accurate and/or consistent glucose values may be determined from measurements of light emitted from an implant located relatively deep in the tissue, such as in the subcutaneous region. Light emitted from the implant 12 may be strongly modulated by the tissue 15 between the implant and the surface of the skin 14. Embodiments of the present invention provide means to correct for modulation of light emitted from the tissue 15, in addition to correction for excitation light and background or ambient light, if desired.
Another advantage is that measurements of the reference optical signals used for correction factors (such as diffuse reflectance, autofluorescence, and/or background light) are taken in the same region of tissue 15 in which the implant 12 is embedded in a few seconds of time or less, so that dynamic skin or tissue properties, that may vary within different regions of the body, are substantially the same for the correction signals as they are for the primary analyte-dependent signal at the time of measurement. Prior to executing optical reads for the analyte-dependent signal, the diffuse reflectance correction signal and/or the autofluorescence correction signal, a dark reading may be taken to account for background or ambient light, and this reading may be used to further correct the signals, e.g., by background subtraction. A preferred order of optical readings for the correction factors is background subtraction, autofluorescence correction, and diffuse reflectance correction, although no particular order is required.
In some embodiments, an analyte concentration (e.g., glucose level) is determined from the corrected signal value. Preferably a look-up table or calibration curve is used to determine the analyte concentration in dependence upon the corrected signal value. The look-up table or calibration curve may be in a microprocessor included with the optics. In some embodiments, the microprocessor is programmed to store measured signal values and/or to calculate corrected signal values. Alternatively, these functions may be performed in a separate processor or external computer in communication with the optical device. The external processor or computer receives data representative of the measured optical signals and calculates the corrected signal value and analyte concentration. Alternatively, multiple processors may be provided, e.g., providing one or more processors in the optical device that communicate (wirelessly or with wires) with one or more external processors or computers.
The second embodiment differs from the first embodiment described above in that the device 30 includes a third light source 40 for transmitting excitation light into the tissue 15 through the surface of the skin 14. In the operation of device 30, an analyte-dependent luminescent signal emitted from the implant 12 is corrected using three reference signals. The first light source 32 is activated to transmit excitation light within a first excitation wavelength range from the surface of the skin 14, through the tissue 15, to the implant 12. The first detector 34 measures, in response to the first excitation light, a first optical signal emitted from the tissue 15 at the surface of the skin 14 within a first emission wavelength range, as represented by a first light path 42 from the first light source 32, to the implant 12, and to the first detector 34. This first optical signal is the primary analyte-dependent optical signal.
The second light source 38 is activated to transmit second excitation light from the surface of the skin 14 to a second depth in the tissue 15. The second excitation light is preferably within the first emission wavelength range (e.g., the emission peak) of the primary analyte-dependent optical signal. The first detector 34 measures, in response to the second excitation light, a second optical signal emitted from the tissue 15 at the surface of the skin 14 within the emission wavelength range, as represented by a second light path 44. The second optical signal may be used to correct for diffuse reflectance or scattering of light in the tissue 15 between the implant 12 and the surface of the skin 14. In some embodiments, the depth of the second light path 44 may be substantially equal to the first depth at which the implant 12 is embedded (preferably in the subcutaneous tissue 1 to 5 mm under the surface of the skin 14). In some embodiments, the light path 44 for the second optical signal extends to a depth greater than or equal to 2 mm under the surface of the skin 14, and in other embodiments the light path 44 for the second optical signal extends to a depth greater than or equal to 4 mm under the surface of the skin.
Next, the light source 38 is activated to transmit third excitation light in the second excitation wavelength range from the surface of the skin 14 to the implant 12. The second detector 36 measures, in response to the third excitation light, a third optical signal emitted from the tissue 15 at the surface of the skin 14 within the second emission wavelength range, as represented by a third light path 46. In this embodiment, the third optical signal is the analyte-independent luminescent signal. Next, the third light source 40 is activated to transmit fourth excitation light from the surface of the skin 14 into the tissue 15. The fourth excitation light is preferably within the emission wavelength range of the analyte-independent luminescent signal. The detector 36 measures, in response to the fourth excitation light, a fourth optical signal emitted from the tissue 15 at the surface of the skin 14 within this emission wavelength range, as represented by a fourth light path 48. At least one corrected signal value is calculated in dependence upon the measured optical signals. In one example, the primary analyte-dependent signal from the implant 12 may be corrected as:
Corrected Signal=S(LS1,D1)*C(LS2,D1)/[S(LS2,D2)*C(LS3,D2)] (2)
In equation (2) above, the term S(LS1, D1) represents the first optical signal which is the primary analyte-dependent signal measured from the first light path 42 from the first light source 32 to the implant 12 to the first detector 34. The term C(LS2, D1) represents the second optical signal, which is a correction factor signal measured from the second light path 44 from the second light source 38 to the first detector 34. The term S(LS2, D2) represents the third optical signal, which is the analyte-independent signal measured from the third light path 46 extending from the second light source 38 to the implant 12 to the second detector 36. The term C(LS3, D2) represents the fourth optical signal, which is a correction factor signal measured from the fourth light path 48 extending from the third light source 40 to the second detector 36.
In some embodiments in which two implant reporters (e.g., luminescent dyes) are utilized, it is possible that the implant reporters may share or overlap excitation (absorption) or emission wavelength ranges. For example, in the embodiment of
When the optical device has multiple possible combinations of spacing distances between the light sources and detectors as shown in
In some embodiments, the processor is programmed to determine (e.g., by calculation or a look-up table) a quantity or weight assigned to measurements of one or more diffuse reflectance signals. The quantity or weight assigned to the measured diffuse reflectance signal may then be used in correcting or normalizing one or more implant reporter signals (e.g., the primary analyte-dependent signal emitted from the implant) to calculate the corrected signal value. The quantity or weight is preferably determined in dependence upon the intensity of an analyte-independent optical signal (e.g., from the stable reference dye). The intensity of the analyte-independent optical signal may vary with the depth of the implant in the tissue. For example, if the implant is embedded in tissue at a depth of 2 mm under the surface of the skin, the amount of light attenuation in the tissue will likely be less than if the implant were embedded at a depth of 4 mm. Reporter optical signals emitted from a shallower implant may require less of a correction factor for diffuse reflectance and/or autofluorescence than those signals emitted from an implant embedded at a greater depth. In some embodiments, the diffuse reflectance correction factor used to correct or normalize the analyte-dependent signal is proportional to depth, and the quantity or weight assigned to the diffuse reflectance measurement is determined in dependence upon the measurement of the analyte-independent signal.
As shown in Table 1, optical channels 1-3 function to measure three reporter dye signals from the implant, including an analyte-specific signal, an analyte-independent signal, and a stable reference dye signal. Optical channel 1 functions to measure an analyte-specific luminescent signal from the implant, such as a light signal whose intensity varies with glucose level. Other embodiments may include multiple analyte-dependent signals from the implant. Optical channel 2 functions to measure an analyte-independent control for non-analyte physical or chemical effects on the reporter dyes (e.g., photo bleaching, pH). Optical channel 3 functions to measure a stable reference dye (e.g., lanthanide).
As listed in Table 1 and shown in
A suitable dye for the analyte-dependent signal is Alexa 647 which is responsive to excitation light within an excitation wavelength range of about 600 to 650 nm (excitation peak 647 nm) and within an emission wavelength range of about 670 to 750 nm with an emission peak of about 680 nm. A suitable dye for the analyte-independent signal is Alexa 750 which is responsive to excitation light within an excitation wavelength range of about 700 to 760 nm (excitation peak 750 nm) and within an emission wavelength range of about 770 to 850 nm with an emission peak of about 780 nm. A suitable stable reference dye is erbium with a first excitation light wavelength range of about 650 to 670 nm (excitation peak about 650 nm), a second excitation wavelength range of about 800 to 815 nm (with an excitation peak of about 805 nm), and an emission wavelength range of about 980 to 1050 nm (emission peak of about 1020 nm). In another embodiment, erbium an Alexa 647 may be excited from the same light source, which has the advantage that an optional step of power normalization between multiple light sources is reduced or eliminated.
Referring again to Table 1, optical channels 4-6 provide exciter power normalization signals, which are preferred in embodiments where more than one light source is used. The exciter power normalization signals are used to normalize differences in the power of excitation light output by each light source, which output power may vary slightly for each light source. As shown in
Optical channels 7-9 (Table 1) provide diffuse reflectance measurements to correct the luminescent dye reporter signals from the implant. As shown in
Optical channels 10-12 (Table 1) provide measurements of autofluorescence and ambient light to correct the luminescent dye reporter signals from the implant. As shown in
It is preferred that the lateral spacing S4 be greater than or equal to 0.25 cm, more preferably greater than 0.5 cm, and most preferably greater than 1 cm. It is also preferred that the depth of the light path 78 extend about 1 to 5 mm into the tissue 15 under the surface of the skin 14. When multiple pairs are used, each light path may have substantially the same depth or different depths, and the measured intensities of the autofluorescence optical signals may be averaged to obtain a correction factor. It is preferred that the contribution from the implant reporter(s) (e.g., fluorophores) to the autofluorescence measurement be less than 30% of the measured intensity, more preferably less than 20%, an most preferably less than 10%.
It should be clear to one skilled in the art that embodiments of the described invention may include cabled or wireless hand-held readers, wireless skin patch readers, bench-top instruments, imaging systems, handheld devices (e.g., cell phones or mobile communication devices), smartphone attachments and applications, or any other configuration that utilizes the disclosed optics and algorithms.
Tissue optical heterogeneity in some cases may be significant. Thus, it may be advantageous to utilize a single light source and a single detector to assure that every color passes through the same optical pathway through the tissue. In one embodiment, a light source can be positioned with a set of moveable filters between the light source and the surface of the skin. Similarly a single photodetector can be utilized in place of separate discrete detector elements. The detector may be used to detect different colors by using moveable or changeable filters to enable multiple wavelengths to be measured. Changing or moving filters may be accomplished by a mechanical actuator controlling a rotating disc, filter strip or other means. Alternatively, optical filters may be coated with a material that when subjected to current, potential, temperature or another controllable influence, will change optical filtering properties, so that a single photodetector can serve to detect multiple colors.
It will be clear to one skilled in the art that the above embodiments may be altered in many ways without departing from the scope of the invention. For example, many different permutations or arrangements of one or more light sources, one or more detectors, filters, and/or fibers connecting the optical components may be used to realize the device and method of the invention. For example, in some embodiments the light sources and detectors are arranged with optical fibers or cables to transmit excitation light into the skin and measure optical signals emitted from the skin, without having to position the light sources and detectors directly on the skin of an individual. Presently preferred values for dimensions of the device and/or wavelength ranges may differ in alternative embodiments. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be determined by the following claims and their legal equivalents.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application 61/785,087 filed on Mar. 14, 2013, titled “Method and Device for Correcting Optical Signals”, which application is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4703756 | Gough et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
5242835 | Jensen | Sep 1993 | A |
5284140 | Allen et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5371122 | Kawahara et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5487885 | Sovak et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5551422 | Simonsen et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5777060 | Van Antwerp | Jul 1998 | A |
5837865 | Vinogradov et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5895658 | Fossel | Apr 1999 | A |
5962852 | Knuettel et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6002954 | Van Antwerp et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6011984 | Van Antwerp et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6013122 | Klitzman et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6040194 | Chick et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6104945 | Modell et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6175752 | Say et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6212416 | Ward et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6274086 | Wilson et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6299604 | Ragheb et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6319540 | Van Antwerp et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6362175 | Vinogradov et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6475750 | Han et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6497729 | Moussy et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6565509 | Say et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6565960 | Koob et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6602678 | Kwon et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6642015 | Vachon et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6671527 | Petersson et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6702857 | Brauker et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6750311 | Van Antwerp et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6766183 | Walsh et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6794195 | Colvin, Jr. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6804544 | Van Antwerp | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6818226 | Reed et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6821530 | Koob et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6844023 | Schulman et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6965791 | Hitchcock et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6994691 | Ejlersen | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7060503 | Colvin, Jr. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7067194 | Mao et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7110803 | Shults et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7132049 | Hou et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7134999 | Brauker et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7153265 | Vachon | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7162289 | Shah et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7186789 | Hossainy et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7192450 | Brauker et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7202947 | Liu et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7226978 | Tapsak et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7228159 | Petersson et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7406345 | Muller et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7424317 | Parker et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7450980 | Kawanishi | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7496392 | Alarcon | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7541598 | Aasmul | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7567347 | Aasmul | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7653424 | March | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7772286 | Muller et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7869853 | Say et al. | Jan 2011 | B1 |
7927519 | Domschke et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7939332 | Colvin, Jr. | May 2011 | B2 |
7972628 | Ratner et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7972875 | Rogers et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8057041 | Muller et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8131333 | Chapoy et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8229536 | Goode, Jr. et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8249684 | Kamath et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8260393 | Kamath et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8280476 | Jina | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8282550 | Rasdal et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8292810 | Goode, Jr. et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8318193 | Ratner et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8346337 | Heller et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8346338 | Goode, Jr. et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8346363 | Darvish et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8368556 | Sicurello et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8372423 | Marshall et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8385998 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8386004 | Kamath et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8412301 | Goode, Jr. et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8423114 | Simpson et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8428678 | Kamath et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8435179 | Goode, Jr. et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8452361 | Muller | May 2013 | B2 |
8452363 | Muller et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8460231 | Brauker et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8465425 | Heller et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8483793 | Simpson et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8491474 | Goode, Jr. et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8527025 | Shults et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8527026 | Shults et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8535262 | Markle et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8543182 | Botvinick et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8543184 | Boock et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8543354 | Luo et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8562558 | Kamath et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8579879 | Palerm et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8608924 | Cooper et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
RE44695 | Simpson et al. | Jan 2014 | E |
8622903 | Jin et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8628471 | Mazar et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8647271 | Muller et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8647393 | Marshall et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8666471 | Rogers | Mar 2014 | B2 |
9244064 | Muller et al. | Jan 2016 | B2 |
9650566 | Gamsey et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9826926 | Muller et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
20020043651 | Darrow et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020048577 | Bornstein | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020094526 | Bayley et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020193672 | Walsh | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004554 | Riff et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030050542 | Reihl et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030088682 | Hlasny | May 2003 | A1 |
20030099682 | Moussy et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030171666 | Loeb et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030208166 | Schwartz | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040106951 | Edman et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040143221 | Shadduck | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040161853 | Yang et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040176669 | Colvin, Jr. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040195528 | Reece et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20010259270 | Wolf | Dec 2004 | |
20040258732 | Shikinami | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040259270 | Wolf | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050027175 | Yang | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050095174 | Wolf | May 2005 | A1 |
20050096587 | Santini, Jr. et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050118726 | Schultz et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050119737 | Bene et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050154374 | Hunter et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050182389 | LaPorte et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050237518 | Colvin, Jr. et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050245799 | Brauker et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060002890 | Hersel et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060002969 | Kyriakides et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060089548 | Hogan | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060148983 | Muller et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060155179 | Muller et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060252976 | Rosero | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060270919 | Brenner | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060275340 | Udipi et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060289307 | Yu et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070002470 | Domschke et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070004046 | Abbott | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070010702 | Wang et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070030443 | Chapoy et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070093617 | DesNoyer et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070105176 | Ibey | May 2007 | A1 |
20070110672 | Bellott et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070134290 | Rowland et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070135698 | Shah et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070244379 | Boock et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070270675 | Kane et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080020012 | Ju et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080075752 | Ratner et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080139903 | Bruce et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080249381 | Muller et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080311304 | Thompson et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090005663 | Parker et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090018425 | Ouyang et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090131773 | Struve et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090221891 | Yu et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090270953 | Ecker et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100113901 | Zhang et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100123121 | Taylor | May 2010 | A1 |
20100160749 | Gross et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100185066 | March | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100249548 | Mueller | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100303772 | McMillan et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110028806 | Merritt et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110036994 | Frayling | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110224514 | Muller et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110230835 | Muller et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20120123276 | Govari et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120140094 | Shpunt et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120165435 | Santhanam et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120172692 | Tamada et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120179014 | Shults et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120186581 | Brauker et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120190953 | Brauker et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120191063 | Brauker et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120215201 | Brauker et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120220979 | Brauker et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120226121 | Kamath et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120238852 | Brauker et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120245445 | Black et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120258551 | Herbrechtsmeier et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120265034 | Wisniewski et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120283538 | Rose et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120296311 | Brauker et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130004785 | Carlson et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130006069 | Gil et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130030273 | Tapsak et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130041200 | Sorokin et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130060105 | Shah et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130158413 | Lisogurski | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130172699 | Rebec et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130211213 | Dehennis et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130213110 | Papadimitrakopoulos et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130213112 | Stumber | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130229660 | Goldschmidt et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130231542 | Simpson et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130310666 | Shults et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130310670 | Boock et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130311103 | Cooper et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130313130 | Little et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130337468 | Muller et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140000338 | Luo et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140286875 | Gamsey et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140316224 | Sato | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140357964 | Wisniewski et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20140364707 | Kintz et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20160213288 | Wisniewski et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160374556 | Colvin et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170087376 | McMillan et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170325722 | Wisniewski et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1675547 | Sep 2005 | CN |
1882278 | Dec 2006 | CN |
2004-537344 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2007-044512 | Feb 2007 | JP |
2007-537805 | Dec 2007 | JP |
2009-540936 | Nov 2009 | JP |
WO 9109312 | Jun 1991 | WO |
WO 9719188 | May 1997 | WO |
WO 9806406 | Feb 1998 | WO |
WO 9822820 | May 1998 | WO |
WO 0002048 | Jan 2000 | WO |
WO 0118543 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 2001075450 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 2002087610 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 2003006992 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 2005120631 | Dec 2005 | WO |
WO 2006004595 | Jan 2006 | WO |
WO 2006010604 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 2006044972 | Apr 2006 | WO |
WO 2006065266 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2006130461 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO 2007126444 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2008105791 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO 2008141241 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO 2008142158 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO 2008143651 | Nov 2008 | WO |
WO 2009106805 | Sep 2009 | WO |
WO 2010037847 | Apr 2010 | WO |
WO 2010133831 | Nov 2010 | WO |
WO 2010141377 | Dec 2010 | WO |
WO 2011101624 | Aug 2011 | WO |
WO 2011101625 | Aug 2011 | WO |
WO 2011101627 | Aug 2011 | WO |
WO 2011101628 | Aug 2011 | WO |
WO 2012027593 | Mar 2012 | WO |
WO 2012048150 | Apr 2012 | WO |
WO 2013073270 | May 2013 | WO |
WO 2013132400 | Sep 2013 | WO |
WO 2014158988 | Oct 2014 | WO |
WO 2014160258 | Oct 2014 | WO |
WO 2014197786 | Dec 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
HyperSpectral imaging microscopy for identification and quantitative analysis of fluorescently-labeled cells in highly autfluorescent tissue, S. Leavesley, N. Annamdevula, J. Boni, S. Stocker, K. Grant, B. Troyanovsky, T. C. Rich, D. F. Alvarez, J Biophotonics, 5(1), pp. 67-48, 2012. |
Examination Report for Australian Application No. 2011311889, dated Dec. 20, 2013. |
Examination Report for Australian Application No. 2011311889, dated May 28, 2014. |
Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201180057627.5, dated Dec. 15, 2014. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Application No. 2013-532954, dated Mar. 31, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2011/055157, dated Jan. 23, 2012. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/267,741, dated Mar. 20, 2015. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/267,741, dated Apr. 1, 2014. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/267,741, dated Oct. 7, 2015. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/267,741, dated Nov. 20, 2014. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/041284, dated Dec. 4, 2014. |
Examination Report for Australian Application No. 2010256930, dated Dec. 18, 2013. |
Examination Report for Australian Application No. 2010256930, dated Oct. 28, 2014. |
Examination Report for Australian Application No. 2010256930, dated Feb. 13, 2015. |
Office Action for Canadian Application No. 2,763,687, dated Aug. 5, 2015. |
Office Action and Search Report for Chinese Application No. 201080033712.3, dated Jan. 5, 2013. |
Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201080033712.3, dated Sep. 23, 2013. |
Supplementary European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 10783874.0, dated Aug. 25, 2015. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Application No. 2012-514023, dated Mar. 18, 2014. |
Decision of Final Rejection for Japanese Application No. 2012-514023, dated Jan. 6, 2015. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/789,048, dated Sep. 29, 2014. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/789,048, dated Nov. 25, 2014. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/789,048, dated Dec. 5, 2012. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/789,048, dated May 23, 2012. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2010/036698, dated Feb. 9, 2011. |
International Preliminary Report on Patenability in International Application No. PCT/US2010/036698, dated Dec. 6, 2011. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/209,252, dated Apr. 14, 2015. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US2014/026183, dated Jul. 14, 2014. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in International Application No. PCT/US2014/021298, dated Sep. 15, 2015. |
Alexeev et al., “High ionic strength glucose-sensing protonic crystal,” Anal. Chem., 75:2316-2323 (2003). |
Alexeev et al., “Protonic crystal glucose-sensing material for noninvasive monitoring of glucose in tear fluid,” Clinical Chemistry, 50(12):2353-2360 (2004). |
Aslan et al., “Nanogold plasmon-resonance-based glucose sensing 2: wavelengthratiometric resonance light scattering,” Anal. Chem., 77(7):2007-2014 (2005). |
Badylak et al., “Immune response to biologic scaffold materials,” Seminars in Immunology, 20(2):109-116 (2008). |
Ballerstedt et al., “Competitive-binding assay method based on fluorescence quenching of ligands held in close proximity by a multivalent receptor,” Anal. Chem., Acta. 345:203-212 (1997). |
Bhardwaj, U. et al., “A review of the development of a vehicle for localized and controlled drug delivery for implantable biosensors,” Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 2(6):1016-1029 (2008). |
Billingsley et al., “Fluorescent nano-optodes for glucose detection, ”Anal. Chem., 82(9):3707-3713 (2010). |
Brasuel et al., “Fluorescent nanosensors for intracellular chemical analysis: decyl methacrylate liquid polymer matrix and ion-exchange-based potassium pebble sensors with real-time application to viable rat C6 glioma cells,” Anal. Chem., 73(10):2221-2228 (2001). |
Brasuel et al., “Liquid polymer nano-pebbles for CL-analysis and biological applications,” Analyst, 128(10):1262-1267 (2003). |
Braun et al., “Comparison of tumor and normal tissue oxygen tension measurements using oxylite or microelectrodes in rodents,” Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol., 280(6):H2533-H2544 (2001). |
Bridges et al., “Chronic inflammatory responses to microgel-based implant coatings,” J Biomed. Mater. Res. A., 94(1):252-258 (2010). |
Chaudhary et al., “Evaluation of glucose sensitive affinity binding assay entrapped in fluorescent dissolved-core alginate microspheres,” Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 104(6):1075-1085 (2009). |
Cordiero, P.G. et al., “The protective effect of L-arginine on ischemia-reperfusion injury in rat skin flaps,” Plast Reconstruct Surg., 100(5):1227-1233 (1997). |
Dunphy, I. et al., “Oxyphor R2 and G2: phosphors for measuring oxygen by oxygen-dependent quenching phosphorescence,” Anal. Biochem., 310:191-198 (2002). |
Garg, S. K. et al., “Improved glucose excursions using an implantable real-time continuous glucose sensor in adults with Type 1 diabetes,” Diabetes Care, 27(3):734-738 (2004). |
Henninger, N., et al., “Tissue response to subcutaneous implantation of glucose-oxidase-based glucose sensors in rats,” Biosens Bioelectron, 23(1):26-34 (2007). |
Horgan et al,, “Crosslinking of phenylboronic acid receptors as a means of glucose selective holographic detection,” Biosensors and Bioelectronics, 21(9):1838-1845 (2006). |
Ibey et al., “Competitive binding assay for glucose based on glycodendrimer fluorophore conjugates,” Anal. Chem., 77(21):7039-7046 (2005). |
Isenhath et al., “A mouse model to evaluate the interface between skin and a percutaneous device,” J Biomed. Mater. Research, 83A:915-922 (2007). |
Ju, Y. M. et al., “A novel porous collagen scaffold around an implantable biosensor for improving biocompatibility. I. In vitrol in vivo stability of the scaffold and in vitro sensitivity of the glucose sensor with scaffold,” J Biomed. Mater. Research, 87A:136-146 (2008), Available online Dec. 17, 2007. |
Kaehr et al., “Multiphoton fabrication of chemically responsive protein hydrogels for microactuation,” PNAS USA, 105(26):8850-8854 (2008). |
Kasprzak, S. E., “Small-scale polymer structures enabled by thiol-ene copolymer systems,” Doctoral Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology, May 2009. |
Klimowicz, A. et al., “Evaluation of skin penetration of topically applied drugs by cutaneous microdialysis:acyclovir vs salicylic acid,” J Clin Pharm Ther, 3(2):143-148 (2007). |
Kloxin, A. M. et al., “Photodegradable hydrogels for dynamic tuning of physical and chemical properties,” Science, 324:59-63 (2009). |
Mansouri et al., “A minature optical glucose sensor based on affinity binding,” Nature Biotechnology, 23:885-890 (1984). |
Marshall et al., “Biomaterials with tightly controlled pore size that promote vascular in-growth,” ACS Polymer Preprints, 45(2):100-101 (2004). |
McShane et al., “Glucose monitoring using implanted fluorescent microspheres,” IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, 19(6):36-45 (2000). |
Nagler, A. et al., “Topical treatment of cutaneous chronic graft versus host disease with halofuginone: a novel inhibitor of collagen Type 1 synthesis,” Transplantation, 68(11):1806-1809 (1999). |
Nielsen et al., “Clinical evaluation of a transcutaneous interrogated fluorescence lifetime-based microsensor for continuous glucose reading,” J Diabetes and Technology, 3(1):98-109 (2009). |
Nielson, R. et al., “Microreplication and design of biological architectures using dynamicmask multiphoton lithography,” Small, 5(1):120-125 (2009). |
Onuki, Y. et al., “A review of the biocompatibility of implantable devices: Current challenges to overcome foreign body response,” Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 2(6):1003-1015 (2008). |
Ostendorf, A. et al., “Two-photon polymerization: a new approach to micromachining,” Photonics Spectra, 40(10):72-79 (2006). |
Ozdemir et al., “Axial pattern composite prefabrication of high-density porous polyethylene: experimental and clinical research,” Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 115(1):183-196 (2005). |
Phelps et al., “Bioartificial matrices for therapeutic vascularization,” PNAS USA, 107(8):3323-3328 (2010). |
Pickup, J. C. et al., “In vivo glucose monitoring: the clinical reality and the promise,” Biosens Bioelectron., 20(10)1897-1902 (2005), Available online Oct. 3, 2004. |
Rounds et al., “Microporated peg spheres for fluorescent analyte detection,” Journal of Fluorescence, 17(1):57-63 (2007), Available online Nov. 17, 2006. |
Russell et al., “A fluorescence-based glucose biosensor using concanavalin A and dextran encapsulated in apoly(ethylene glycol) hydrogel,” Anal. Chem., 71(15):3126-3132 (1999). |
Sanders et al., “Tissue response to single polymer fibers of varying diameters: evaluation of fibrous encapsulation and macrophage density,” J Biomed. Mater. Research, 52:231-237 (2000). |
Sanders et al., “Tissue response to microfibers of different polymers: polyester, polyethylene, polylactic acid, and polyurethane,” J Biomed. Mater. Research, 62(2):222-227 (2002). |
Sanders et al., “Fibrous encapsulation of single polymer micro-fibers depends on their vertical dimension in subcutaneous tissue,” J Biomed. Mater. Research, 67A:1181-1187 (2003). |
Sanders et al., “Relative influence of polymer fiber diameter and surface charge on fibrous capsule thickness and vessel density for single-fiber implants,” J Biomed. Mater. Research, 65A:462-467 (2003). |
Sanders et al., “Polymer microfiber mechanical properties: a system for assessment and investigation of the link with fibrous capsule formation,” J Biomed. Mater. Research, 67A:1412-1416 (2003). |
Sanders et al., “Small fiber diameter fibro-porous meshes: tissue response sensitivity to fiber spacing,” J Biomed Mater Research, 72A:335-342 (2005). |
Sanders et al., “Fibro-porous meshes made from polyurethane micro-fibers: effects of surface charge on tissue response,” Biomaterials, 26(7):813-818 (2005). |
Schultz et al., “Affinity sensor: a new technique for developing implantable sensors for glucose and other metabolites,” Diabetes Care, 5(3)245-253 (1982). |
Smith, J. L., “The Pursuit of Noninvasive Glucose: ‘Hunting the Deceitful Turkey,’” (2006). |
Srivastava et al., “Application of self-assembled ultrathin film coatings to stabilize macromolecule encapsulation in alginate microspheres,” J of Microencapsulation, 22(4):397-411 (2005). |
Srivasta et al., “Stabilization of glucose oxidase in alginate microspheres with photo reactive diazoresin nanofilm coatings,” Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 91(1):124-131 (2005). |
Takano et al., “An oxo-bacteriochlorin derivative for long-wavelength fluorescence ratiometric alcohol sensing,” Analyst, 135:2334-2339 (2010). |
Tian et al., “Dually fluorescent sensing of PH and dissolved oxygen using a membrane made from polymerizable sensing monomers,” Sensors and Actuators B, 147:714-722 (2010). |
Tian et al., “Influence of matrices on oxygen sensing of three-sensing films with chemically conjugated platinum porphyrin probes and preliminary application for monitoring of oxygen consumption of Escherichia coli (E. coli),” Sensors and Actuators B, 150:579-587 (2010). |
Tian, Y. et al., “A New Cross-linkable Oxygen Sensor Covalently Bonded into Poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate)-co-Polyacrylamide Thin Film for Dissolved Oxygen Sensing,” Chem. Mater, 22:2069-2078 (2010). |
Vidavalur, R. et al., “Sildenafil induces angiogenic response in human coronary arterioloar endothelial cells through the expression of thioredoxin, hemaoxygenase, and VEGF,” Vasc Pharm, 45(2):91-95 (2006). |
Ward, W. K. et.al., “The effect of microgeometry, implant thickness and polyurethane chemistry on the foreign body response to subcutaneous implants,” Biomaterials, 23(21):4185-4192 (2002). |
Wisniewski, N. et.al., “Characterization of implantable biosensor membrane fouling,” Fresen J Anal Chem., 366 (6-7):611-621 (2000). |
Wisniewski, N. et. al., “Methods for reducing biosensor membrane biofouling,” Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, 18:197-219 (2000). |
Woderer, S., “Continuous glucose monitoring in interstitial fluid using glucose oxidase-based sensor compared to established blood glucose measurement in rats,” Anal Chim Acta., 581(1):7-12 (2007), Epub Aug. 18, 2006. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/789,048, dated Dec. 14, 2015. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection for Japanese Application No. 2016-500748, dated Feb. 26, 2018, 8 pages. |
Examination Report No. 1 for Australian Application No. 2014241420, dated Sep. 1, 2017, 3 pages. |
First Office Action for Chinese Application No. 201480016308.3, dated Mar. 29, 2017, 16 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. 14775668.8, dated Oct. 13, 2016. |
Shibata, H. et al., “Injectable hydrogel microbeads for fluorescence-based in vivo continuous glucose monitoring”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Oct. 19, 2010, vol. 107, No. 42, pp. 17894-17898. |
Young et al., “A novel porous collagen scaffold around an implantable biosensor for improving biocompatibility. I. In vitro/in vivo stability of the scaffold and in vitro sensitivity of the glucose sensor with scaffold,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A., 2008, vol. 87, pp. 136-146. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140275869 A1 | Sep 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61785087 | Mar 2013 | US |