Method and device for delivering radiotherapy

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8376613
  • Patent Number
    8,376,613
  • Date Filed
    Friday, October 28, 2011
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, February 19, 2013
    11 years ago
Abstract
A device 10 for aligning a patient for delivering a plurality of radiation beams comprising a patient support surface 12, a coarse alignment subsystem 14 connected to the patient support surface, and a fine alignment subsystem connected to the patient support surface 16. A method of aligning a patient for delivering a plurality of radiation beams from a plurality of device positions comprising compensating for flexion of a radiation beam delivery device within a gantry during movement of the radiation beam delivery device from a first device position to a second device position by using a set of predetermined data describing the flexion behavior of the radiation beam delivery device so that the target tissue within the patient is placed at the beamline center for the radiation beam delivery device at the second device position.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Description of the Related Art

The application of radiation is used for a variety of diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. For example, external radiotherapy known as “teletherapy” is used to treat approximately half of all patients with cancer in the United States, as well as being used to treat patients with arterio-venous malformations, intraocular subfoveal neovascular membranes and Parkinson's disease, among other diseases and conditions.


Generally, teletherapy has been performed using x-ray beams or electron beams. More recently, however, teletherapy has been performed using proton beams due to two characteristics of proton beams. First, proton beams do not scatter as much as either x-ray beams or electron beams. Thus, teletherapy with a proton beam can be applied with a steeper dose gradient near the edge of the proton beam than for an x-ray beam or electron beam. Second, protons lose energy at a more rapid rate as they penetrate tissue, thereby delivering a greater dose at the depth of the target tissue. These two characteristics of proton beams allow the delivery of higher doses to target tissues while minimizing radiation to adjacent normal tissues.


The delineation of target tissues from non-target tissues and the selection of beam directions is typically performed using a computerized treatment planning system. The computerized treatment planning system analyzes input information, such as x-ray axial computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, and provides output information, such as beam directions, shapes of normal tissue shields for each beam, and patient alignment information for each beam.


Regardless of the type of teletherapy, however, proper patient alignment is critical to delivering sufficient radiation to target tissues while minimizing radiation delivered to non-target tissues. Patient alignment is the process by which a patient is reproducibly interfaced with the radiation delivery equipment for the purposes of obtaining anatomical, morphological, and physiological information, for performing treatment simulations, and for delivering treatments. The goals of patient alignment are to permit unrestricted access to the patient by radiation beams, and to provide accurate tissue targeting and dose delivery, while promoting patient comfort and safety, and allowing for quick patient egress from the radiation delivery equipment.


The five steps in the patient alignment process are registration, immobilization, localization, positioning and verification. Registration comprises placing the patient on a patient positioner, such as a movable table, in a reproducible manner. Immobilization comprises fixing the registered patient to the patient positioner so that they move together as a single unit in a controlled fashion. Localization comprises determining the location of the target tissue relative to the diagnostic, simulation or treatment unit. Positioning comprises moving the patient positioner to place the target tissue in the desired orientation at the desired location. Verification comprises verifying the patient's orientation and location, and can comprise using the same technique as localization. One or more than one of these steps can be repeated as required. If patient alignment is performed rapidly, the patient is more likely to remain properly aligned, minimizing the margin placed around the target tissue to account for motion and reducing the radiation dose to non-target tissues


Patient alignment is usually performed with the patient in a supine position because a larger surface area of the patient is captured by registration and immobilization devices, because the entire patient is at a height more accessible to treatment personnel and because patients are generally more comfortable in the supine position. Most patient positioners have, therefore, been some form of a table.


Registration is typically accomplished using a registration device such as a low-density foam that is custom molded to the patient's shape and attached to the top of the patient positioner. The patient lies directly on the foam, preventing the patient from rolling and translating with respect to the patient positioner, and increasing patient comfort.


Immobilization is typically accomplished using a thermoplastic net that attaches to the patient positioner and that covers both the patient and the registration device. Alternatively, for teletherapy involving the head and neck, immobilization can be accomplished using a ring referred to as a ‘halo’ that is screwed into the patient's skull and then bolted to the patient positioner.


High precision localization and verification generally rely on radiographic techniques and fiducial markers. The fiducial markers can be internal, such as natural anatomical landmarks or implanted landmarks, or can be external such as a z-box attached to a halo.


Localization and verification for proton beam teletherapy typically uses proton beam treatment units that comprise a diagnostic x-ray source capable of projecting an x-ray beam to simulate the intended path of the proton beam. The x-ray beam passes through the patient creating localization images captured on film or by an electronic portal imaging device. Localization is achieved by comparing the localization images with digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRS) generated by the treatment planning system. The patient is repositioned iteratively and new localization images are generated until coincidence of the localization images and digitally reconstructed radiographs are obtained thereby verifying the location.


After patient alignment has been completed, teletherapy is commonly performed using isocentric gantries that facilitate the entry of radiation beams into patients from multiple directions in a timely manner. A gantry is a mechanical device that houses a radiation beam delivery system, and comprises one or more than one instrument, such as a particle accelerator, an x-ray tube, a beam spreading device, beam limiting collimators, a particle range modifier, a fluence modifying device and a dose monitoring detector.


The rotation axes of the gantry and the patient positioner intersect at a point in space called the isocenter. The center of the target tissue within the patient is generally placed at the isocenter. Unfortunately, radiation beam delivery devices within the gantry are prone to flex when rotated and, thereby, cause misalignment of the radiation beam with the target tissue.


Historically, when radiation field alignment was not critical to avoid normal tissues adjacent to the target tissues, the edges of radiation fields were placed at large distances around the target tissue volumes to ensure that the target tissue would be hit regardless of the misalignment of the radiation beam due to deflections of the radiation beam delivery system. When critical normal tissues were adjacent to target tissues, however, precise alignment was achieved either by radiographically repositioning the patient for each individual beam or by using large, rigid, and complex mechanical structures to reduce deflections of radiation beam delivery system. Disadvantageously, however, radiographically repositioning a patient requires at least about 15 minutes to align each radiation beam prior to radiation delivery. Therefore, delivering six beams to a patient requires a total treatment time of at least about 1.5 hours. Hence, radiographically repositioning a patient for each radiation beam significantly limits the number of patients that can be treated by each treatment apparatus and increases the cost per treatment.


Therefore, it would be useful to have a method of aligning a patient for delivering multiple radiation beams, such as proton beams, that allows a patient to be aligned in less time between beam deliveries. Further, It would be useful to have a device for aligning a patient for delivering multiple radiation beams, such as proton beams, that allows a patient to be aligned in less time.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

According to one embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a device for aligning a patient for delivering a plurality of radiation beams. The device comprises a patient support surface, a coarse alignment subsystem connected to the patient support surface, and a fine alignment subsystem connected to the patient support surface. In one embodiment, the patient support surface comprises a table. In another embodiment, the coarse alignment subsystem can induce coarse movements of the patient support surface comprising translation motions of as large as about 2 m, and rotations of as large as about 60°. In another embodiment, the coarse alignment subsystem comprises an elevating column. In another embodiment, the coarse alignment subsystem further comprises a base and a plurality of wheels connected to the base. In another embodiment, the coarse alignment subsystem further comprises a base and a counterweight connected to the base. In another embodiment, the device further comprises electronics to control movement of the coarse alignment subsystem. In another embodiment, the coarse alignment subsystem comprises a position detection system to calculate the position of the device. In another embodiment, the device further comprises an interface for affixing one or more than one registration and immobilization device connected to the patient support surface. In a preferred embodiment, the fine alignment subsystem can induce fine movements of the patient support surface comprising translation motions as large as about ±20 mm with a resolution of between about 0.04 mm and 0.1 mm resolution in three perpendicular axes, and pitch and roll rotations as large as about ±5° with a resolution of between about 0.1° and 0.2°. In another preferred embodiment, the fine alignment subsystem can induce fine movements of the patient support surface comprising translation motions as large as about ±20 mm with about 0.05 mm resolution in three perpendicular axes, and pitch and roll rotations of as large as about ±5° with a resolution of about 0.1°. In another embodiment, the device further comprises electronics to control movement of the fine alignment subsystem.


According to another embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a device for aligning a patient for delivering a plurality of radiation beams comprising patient support means, coarse alignment means connected to the patient support means, and fine alignment means connected to the patient support means. In one embodiment, the patient support means comprises a table. In another embodiment, the coarse alignment subsystem can induce coarse movements of the patient support surface comprising translation motions of as large as about 2 m, and rotations of as large as about 60°. In another embodiment, the coarse alignment means comprises an elevating column. In another embodiment, the coarse alignment means further comprises a base and a plurality of wheels connected to the base. In another embodiment, the coarse alignment means further comprises a base and a counterweight connected to the base. In another embodiment, the device further comprises electronics to control movement of the coarse alignment means. In another embodiment, the coarse alignment means comprises a position detection system to calculate the position of the device. In another embodiment, the device further comprises an interface for affixing one or more than one registration and immobilization means connected to the patient support means. In a preferred embodiment, the fine alignment subsystem can induce fine movements of the patient support surface comprising translation motions as large as about ±20 mm with a resolution of between about 0.04 mm and 0.1 mm resolution in three perpendicular axes, and pitch and roll rotations as large as about ±5° with a resolution of between about 0.1° and 0.2°.


According to another embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method of aligning a patient for delivering a plurality of radiation beams from a plurality of device positions comprising providing a device of the present invention. In one embodiment, the device has a beamline center, and the method additionally comprises compensating for flexion of the device during movement of the device from a first device position to a second device position by using a set of predetermined data describing the flexion behavior of the device so that target tissue within the patient is placed at the beamline center for the device at the second device position.


According to another embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method of aligning a patient for delivering a plurality of radiation beams from a plurality of device positions comprising compensating for flexion of a radiation beam delivery device having a beamline center during movement of the radiation beam delivery device from a first device position to a second device position by using a set of predetermined data describing the flexion behavior of the radiation beam delivery device so that the target tissue within the patient is placed at the beamline center for the radiation beam delivery device at the second device position.


According to another embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method of aligning a patient with a target tissue within the patient for delivering a plurality of radiation beams from a plurality of device positions. The method comprises, a) providing a radiation beam delivery device having a beamline center; b) deriving a set of predetermined data describing the flexion behavior of a radiation beam delivery device; c) selecting a patient having one or more than one target tissue suitable for receiving a plurality of radiation beams; d) producing a treatment plan; e) aligning the patient with respect to the radiation beam delivery device oriented at a first device position using the derived set of predetermined data describing the flexion behavior of the radiation beam delivery device to place the target tissue within the patient at the beamline center for the first device position; f) delivering a first radiation beam from the first device position to the target tissue; g) moving the radiation beam delivery device to a second device position; h) compensating for flexion of the radiation beam delivery device produced by the move to the second device position using the derived set of predetermined data describing the flexion behavior of the radiation beam delivery device to place the target tissue within the patient at the beamline center for the second device position; and i) delivering a second radiation beam from the second device position to the target tissue within the patient. In one embodiment, the method further comprises a) moving the radiation beam delivery device to a third device position; b) compensating for flexion of the radiation beam delivery device produced by the move to the third device position using the derived set of predetermined data describing the flexion behavior of a radiation beam delivery device to place the target tissue within the patient at the beamline center for the third device position; and c) delivering a third radiation beam from the third device position to the target tissue within the patient. In another embodiment, selecting a patient having one or more than one target tissue suitable for receiving a plurality of radiation beams comprises selecting a patient having one or more than one target tissue having a disease or condition amenable to teletherapy. The disease or condition can be selected from the group consisting of acoustic neuroma, adenocarcinoma, astrocytoma, chordoma, meningioma, nasopharyngeal carcinoma and pituitary adenoma. In another embodiment, aligning the patient with respect to the radiation beam delivery device oriented at a first device position comprises using a two-stage patient positioner. In another embodiment, compensating for flexion of the radiation beam delivery device produced by the move to the second device position comprises using a two-stage patient positioner and moving the patient and patient positioner as a unit. In another embodiment, compensating for flexion of the radiation beam delivery device produced by the move to the second device position comprises one or more than one action selected from the group consisting of shifting an aperture or block holding cone with respect to the beam delivery apparatus center, shifting the position of beam delivery apparatus defining collimators, and offsetting the scan pattern of a magnetically scanned beam.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with regard to the following description, appended claims, and accompanying figures where:



FIG. 1 is a schematic view of one embodiment of the device for aligning a patient for delivering multiple radiation beams according to the present invention;



FIG. 1A is a schematic view of an embodiment of a device for aligning a patient for delivering multiple beams of radiation;



FIG. 2 is a perspective lateral view of the device in FIG. 1 with the patient support surface in a neutral position;



FIG. 3 is a side elevational schematic view of the device in FIG. 1 showing fine movement of the device in the x-axis;



FIG. 4 is a side elevational schematic view of the device in FIG. 1 showing fine movement of the device in the y-axis;



FIG. 5 is a side elevational schematic view of the device in FIG. 1 showing fine movement of the device in the z-axis;



FIG. 6 is a side elevational schematic view of the device in FIG. 1 showing fine movement of the device in a roll motion;



FIG. 7 is a side elevational schematic view of the device in FIG. 1 showing fine movement of the device in a pitch motion;



FIG. 8 is a top cutaway, schematic view of the device in FIG. 1 illustrating an example of the components of the device in FIG. 1 allowing for fine movement in the x-axis;



FIG. 9 is a top cutaway, schematic view of the device in FIG. 1 illustrating an example of the components of the device in FIG. 1 allowing for fine movement in the y-axis;



FIG. 10 is a top cutaway, schematic view of the device in FIG. 1 illustrating an example of the components of the device in FIG. 1 allowing for fine roll movement;



FIG. 11 is a perspective cutaway, schematic view of the device in FIG. 1 illustrating an example of the components of the device in FIG. 1 allowing for fine pitch movement;



FIG. 12, FIG. 13, FIG. 14 and FIG. 15 are flow charts depicting some steps of various embodiments of the method of the present invention; and



FIG. 16 and FIG. 17 are examples of plots of data sets describing the flexion behavior of a sample radiation beam delivery device in the plane of gantry rotation, and perpendicular to the plane of gantry rotation, respectively, that can be used with the method of alignment of the present invention.



FIG. 18 is a flowchart illustrating one embodiment of a method of positioning a patient for receiving radiation treatment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

According to one embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a device for aligning a patient for delivering a plurality of radiation beams, such as proton beams, from a radiation beam delivery device at a plurality of device positions that allows a patient to be aligned in less time than using conventional aligning devices. According to another embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method of aligning a patient for delivering a plurality of radiation beams, such as proton beams, from a radiation beam delivery device at a plurality of device positions. The method allows a patient to be aligned in less time than using conventional methods. By reducing the amount of time for alignment, both the device and the method allow an increased number of patients to be treated, decrease the cost of treatment per patient, and reduce the amount of radiation exposure to non-target tissues resulting from the alignment process. According to another embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method of performing teletherapy. The method of performing teletherapy comprises aligning a patient using the method of aligning of the present invention and delivering a plurality of radiation beams from two or more than two directions. Though disclosed in connection with teletherapy, and especially teletherapy utilizing proton beams, the device and method can also be used for aligning a patient for delivering other kinds of radiation accurately and rapidly to a circumscribed area, for purposes other than teletherapy, as will be understood by those with skill in the art with reference to this disclosure.


In one embodiment, the present invention is a device for aligning a patient for delivering a plurality of radiation beams that takes less time to align the patient between each beam delivery than using conventional devices. The device can be used with the method of the present invention.


The device comprises a two-stage patient positioner. One stage comprises a coarse alignment subsystem capable of providing large traversals (defined as greater than about 2 m) and large rotations (defined as greater than about 5°) within the treatment room to place target tissue within the patient near the isocenter. The second stage comprises a fine alignment subsystem capable of submillimeter translations and subdegree size rotations to correct for any initial misalignments near isocenter, and to compensate for any deflections in the beam delivery device when a plurality of radiation beams is applied to the target tissue from a plurality of delivery directions.


Referring now to FIG. 1, there is shown a schematic view of one embodiment of the device of the present invention. As can be seen, the device 10 comprises a patient support surface 12, a coarse alignment subsystem 14 connected to the patient support system 12 and a fine alignment subsystem 16 connected to the patient support surface 12.


The coarse alignment subsystem 14 induces coarse movements of the patient support surface 12 around the treatment room. In a preferred embodiment, the coarse alignment subsystem 14 can induce coarse movements of the patient support surface 12 that comprise traversals as large as about 4 m and rotations as large as about 200°. In another preferred embodiment, the coarse alignment subsystem 14 can induce coarse movements of the patient support surface 12 that comprise traversals as large as about 2 m and rotations as large as about 60°. In a particularly preferred embodiment, the coarse alignment subsystem 14 can induce coarse movements of the patient support surface 12 that comprise traversals as large as about 1 m and rotations as large as about 10°.


As shown in FIG. 1, the coarse alignment subsystem 14 comprises an elevating column 18 connected to the fine alignment subsystem 16, and connected to a base 20. The coarse alignment subsystem 14 preferably further comprises a plurality of wheels 22 attached to the base 20, which permit the device 10 to translocate around the treatment room. In one embodiment, the wheels 22 are computer controlled. In another embodiment, the coarse alignment subsystem 14 comprises base stand locks 24 to maintain a selected position of the device 10 in the treatment room. In a preferred embodiment, the coarse alignment subsystem 14 comprises a counterweight 26 connected to the base 20 to counterbalance the weight of the patient support surface 12 and a patient (not shown). Preferably, the coarse alignment subsystem 14 additionally comprises electronics 29 to control movement of the coarse alignment subsystem 14. In one embodiment, the coarse alignment subsystem 14 further comprises a position detection system 30 to calculate the position of the device 10 in the treatment room. A suitable coarse alignment subsystem 14, including a position detection system 30, can be obtained from ONCOlog Medical QA AB of Uppsala, Sweden under the name Hercules, though the belt and belt power stage do not need to be installed for incorporation into the device 10, and the beam axis feature does not need to be used for the device 10. Other commercially available coarse alignment subsystems and position detection systems are also suitable, as will be understood by those with skill in the art with reference to this disclosure.



FIG. 1A illustrates a device for aligning a patient for delivering multiple beams of radiation that takes less time to align the patient than using conventional methods. The device can be used with the method of the present invention.


With further reference to FIG. 1A, the device comprises a two-stage patient positioner. One stage comprises a coarse alignment subsystem capable of providing large traversals (greater than about 2 m) and rotations within the treatment room to place the target within the patient near the nominal exposure location. The other stage comprises a fine alignment sub-system capable of submillimeter translations and sub-degree rotations to correct for initial miss-alignments near the nominal exposure location, provide proper orientation, and to compensate for deflections in the beam delivery apparatus when multiple field directions are applied.


With reference to FIG. 1A, there is shown a schematic view of one embodiment of the device. As can be seen, the device is a two-stage patient positioner that comprises a traveling base stand 1a, a base stand and position detection system 2a, a fine alignment sub-system 3a, a table top 4a, a treatment room patient positioner manual controls, a treatment room user interface monitor and keyboard 6a, a patient positioner control system interface 7a, a real time patient positioner control system computer 8a, a real time patient positioner control system monitor and keyboard 9a, a user interface and patient database computer 10a, a control room user interface monitor and keyboard 11a, a control room patient positioner manual control 12a and a treatment beam control system 13a.


With further reference to FIG. 1A, the traveling base stand 1a provides coarse movements around the treatment room. It comprises an elevating column, three pairs of computer controlled wheels, electronics, and counterweight for the cantilevered table top and patient. Vertical stability of the patient positioner during motion is dependent on the floor under the patient positioner being level to within 0.2 mm. This is achieved using an epoxy mix prior to installation of the patient positioner according to techniques known to those with skill in the art.


With further reference to FIG. 1A, the base stand position detection system 2a comprises several fixed length articulating arms and rotational encoders that are used to calculate the position of the patient positioner in the treatment room. A suitable base stand and position detection system can be obtained from Precitron AB of Uppsala, Sweden under the brand name Hercules®, though other units are also suitable as will be understood by those with skill in the art with reference to this disclosure.


With further reference to FIG. 1A, the fine alignment sub-system 3a provides pitch and roll rotations up to about ±5 0 with a resolution of about 0.10 and three perpendicular translation motions of about ±20 mm with about 0.05 mm resolution. The speed of patient positioner motions is preferably as fast as possible, without displacing patients from their registration device, therefore, the speed is preferably controlled manually by the treatment personnel using an adjustable hand control.


With further reference to FIG. 1A, the table top 4a is a patient support, such as a Atlas® table top from Precitron AB, that has affixed to it various registration and immobilization devices such as whole body pods, foam cradles, face masks, cranial halos, and bite blocks. Interfaces for these devices allow their rapid exchange. The table top 4a further comprises an opposing pair of C-shaped bars that link one part of the table to another along its longitudinal length. As shown, the bars provide an open area that allows radiation beams to pass, while the patient is supported by the registration devices. In a preferred embodiment, the C-shaped arms can be rotated away from the beam path while the patient is registered and immobilized on the table top 4a. With the arms rotated outward and positioned laterally, the open area in which a beam can pass is preferably about 500 mm by 500 mm. With the arms rotated inward, oblique beams with large field sizes may be used.


With further reference to FIG. 1A, the treatment room patient positioner manual control 5 allows direct movement of base sub-system motions and provides enable switches for execution of automatic set-up features, the fine alignment subsystem motions and the compensation moves.


With further reference to FIG. 1A, the patient positioner control system interface 7a distributes power and safety signals and links the real time patient positioner control system computer 8a to the position sensors and drive motors of the base stand 1a, base stand position detection system 2a, and fine alignment sub-system 3a. Both the control system interface 7a and real time computer 8a have been expanded from the standard Hercules configuration to accept the additional signals and commands coming from and going to the fine alignment system. The real time patient positioner control system and keyboard 9a are used for set-up and calibration of the patient positioner.


With further reference to FIG. 1A, the user interface and patient database computer 10a stores the beam delivery system deflection database, runs the compensation algorithm, and stores and downloads patient position files. The treatment room user interface monitor and keyboard 6a and control room user interface monitor and keyboard 11a allow entering patient data and selected patient positioner motions, and are identical except for their location in the treatment room and control room, respectively. The initial alignment is performed using the x-ray image data in using the treatment room user interface monitor and keyboard 6a. Multiple subsequent fields are then treated without entering the treatment room using the control room user interface monitor and keyboard 11a. Safety of the patient, treatment personnel and equipment is enhanced by requiring activation of enable switches on the treatment room patient positioner manual control 5a or on the control room patient positioner manual control 12a.


Referring now to FIG. 2, there is shown a perspective side elevational view of the device 10. As can be seen, the device 10 further comprises a patient support surface 12, such as a table. As shown in FIG. 2, the patient support surface 12 is in a neutral position, that is, parallel to the long axis of the base 20 and perpendicular to the long axis of the elevating column 18. A suitable table is the Atlas patient support surface from ONCOlog Medical QA AB, though other patient support surfaces are also suitable, as will be understood by those with skill in the art with reference to this disclosure.


In a preferred embodiment, the device 10 has interfaces 31 for affixing one or more than one registration and immobilization devices, such as whole body pods, foam cradles, face masks, cranial halos and bite blocks. In another preferred embodiment, as shown, the patient support surface 12 comprises an opposing pair of C-shaped arms 28 that link one part of the patient support surface 12 to another part along its longitudinal length and that allow the distal end of the patient support surface 12 to extend distally, creating an open area that allows a radiation beam to pass into the target tissue unimpeded while the patient remains supported by one or more than one registration device. Preferably, the C-shaped arms 28 can be rotated away from the beam path while the patient is registered and immobilized on the patient support surface 12.


The device 10 further comprises a fine alignment subsystem 16 connected to the patient support surface 12 and to the coarse alignment subsystem 14. The fine alignment subsystem 16 induces fine movements of the patient support surface 12 with respect to the treatment room. In one embodiment, the fine movements comprise translation motions of as large as about ±20 mm with between about 0.04 mm and 0.1 mm resolution in three perpendicular axes, and pitch and roll rotations of as large as about ±5° with a resolution of between about 0.1° and 0.2°. In a preferred embodiment, the fine movements comprise translation motions of as large as about ±20 mm with about 0.05 mm resolution in three perpendicular axes, and pitch and roll rotations of as large as about ±5° with a resolution of about 0.1°.


Referring now to FIG. 3 through FIG. 7, there are shown side elevational schematic views of the device 10 showing: fine movement of the device 10 in the x-axis, FIG. 3; fine movement of the device 10 in the y-axis, FIG. 4; fine movement of the device 10 in the z-axis, FIG. 5; fine movement of the device 10 in a roll motion, FIG. 6; and fine movement of the device 10 in a pitch motion, FIG. 6.


Referring now to FIG. 8, there is shown a top cutaway, schematic view of the device 10 illustrating an example of the components of the device 10 allowing for fine movement in the x-axis. As can be seen, the components of the device 10 allowing for fine movement in the x-axis comprise rails 32, an x-carrier 34, a driver slot with a ball nut 36, a ball screw 38, a bearing holder 40, a motor with gearbox 42, belt pulleys 44, a synchronizing belt 46, and a 10-turn precision potentiometer 48.


Referring now to FIG. 9, there is shown a top cutaway, schematic view of the device 10 illustrating an example of the components of the device 10 allowing for fine movement in the y-axis. As can be seen, the components of the device 10 allowing for fine movement in the y-axis comprise a framework 50, rails 52, a y-carrier 54, a support driver 56, a driver slot with a ball nut 58, a ball screw 60, a bearing holder 62, a motor with gearbox 64, belt pulleys 66, a synchronizing belt 68, and a 10-turn precision potentiometer 70.


Referring now to FIG. 10 there is shown a lateral cutaway, schematic view of the device 10 illustrating an example of the components of the device 10 allowing for fine roll movement. As can be seen, the components of the device 10 allowing for fine roll movement comprise a linear actuator 72, a tabletop 74, a center of rotation for roll angle 76, a lower center of rotation for the actuator 78, and an upper center of rotation for the actuator 80. Also shown are the C-shaped arms 28.


Referring now to FIG. 11 there is shown a lateral cutaway, schematic view of the device 10 illustrating an example of the components of the device 10 allowing for fine pitch movement. As can be seen, the components of the device 10 allowing for fine pitch movement comprise a linear actuator 82, a tabletop 74, a center of rotation for pitch angle 84, a lower center of rotation for the actuator 86, and an upper center of rotation for the actuator 88.


In another embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method of aligning a patient for delivering a plurality of radiation beams, such as proton beams, from a radiation beam delivery device at a plurality of device positions. Referring now to FIG. 12, FIG. 13, FIG. 14 and FIG. 15, there are shown flow charts depicting some steps of various embodiments of the method of the present invention. The method comprises compensating for flexion of a radiation beam delivery device within a gantry during movement of the radiation beam delivery device from a first device position to a second device position by using a set of predetermined data describing the flexion behavior of the radiation beam delivery device so that the target tissue within the patient is placed at the beamline center for the radiation beam delivery device at the second device position. The method allows a patient to be irradiated from a plurality of delivery device positions without the patient undergoing a full realignment procedure between repositioning of the radiation beam delivery device from the first device position to the second device position. The method advantageously reduces the time and cost for delivering a plurality of radiation beams from a plurality of device positions.


The present method of aligning a patient for delivering a plurality of radiation beams from a plurality of device positions comprises the following steps. First, a set of data describing the flexion behavior of a radiation beam delivery device during repositioning is derived. Next, a suitable patient is selected, where the patient has one or more than one target tissue suitable for receiving a plurality of radiation beams. Then, a treatment plan is produced. Next, the patient is aligned with respect to a reference set-up position to place the target tissue within the patient at the isocenter. Then, the radiation beam delivery device is moved to a first device position. Next, flexion of the radiation beam delivery device produced by the move to the first device position is compensated for using the set of predetermined data describing the flexion behavior of the radiation beam delivery device to place the target tissue within the patient at the beamline center for the radiation beam delivery device at the first device position. Then, a first radiation beam from the radiation beam delivery device at the first device position is delivered to the target tissue within the patient. Next, the radiation beam delivery device is moved to a second device position. Then, flexion of the radiation beam delivery device produced by the move to the second device position is compensated for using the set of predetermined data describing the flexion behavior of the radiation beam delivery device to place the target tissue within the patient at the beamline center for the radiation beam delivery device at the second device position. Next, a second radiation beam from the radiation beam delivery device at the second device position is delivered to the target tissue within the patient.


In one embodiment, the radiation beam delivery device is moved to a third device position. Then, flexion of the radiation beam delivery device produced by the move to the third device position is compensated for using the set of predetermined data describing the flexion behavior of a radiation beam delivery device derived previously. Next, a third radiation beam from the radiation beam delivery device at the third device position is delivered to the target tissue within the patient. As will be understood by those with skill in the art with reference to this disclosure, additional radiation beams from additional device positions can be delivered to the target tissue within the patient by compensating for flexion of the radiation beam delivery device produced by the move to the additional device positions using the set of predetermined data describing the flexion behavior of a radiation beam delivery device. Each of these steps will now be disclosed in greater detail. First, a set of data describing the flexion behavior of a radiation beam delivery device is derived. Referring now to FIG. 16 and FIG. 17, there are shown plots of combined data sets describing the flexion behavior of two sample radiation beam delivery devices at the Loma Linda University Proton Treatment Facility, Loma Linda, Calif., US, in the plane of gantry, rotation, FIG. 16, and perpendicular to the plane of gantry rotation, FIG. 17. The measurements were made as follows.


Measurement of the mechanical isocenter was divided into two perpendicular components. The first component was used to describe the radial deviation as the gantry rotates, while the second component describes the axial runout. The radial component was measured by first inserting a milled block into the end of the beam delivery device closest to where the patient would be located during a treatment. The milled block extended from the delivery device to beyond the estimated virtual center of the gantry. A theodolite with a 32× magnification telescope was placed in the room approximately three meters from the presumed isocenter and coaxially with it. A grid on the block was observed through the theodolite telescope while the gantry was rotated in increments of 10°. After each movement, the coordinate of the cross in the theodolite sight relative to the grid was recorded. After the data were measured, they were transformed from the gantry coordinate system to the room coordinate system and plotted. The axial runout was measured with a dial indicator that was rigidly affixed to the end of the patient positioner with its sensitive point touching the milled block at the previously determined radial isocenter. Again, the gantry was rotated in increments of 10°, stopping to record the measurements. Both radial and axial tests were performed in the clockwise and counterclockwise directions. Circles represent the path of the beamline center during a clockwise rotation while crosses represent the path of the beamline center during a counter clockwise rotation.


Next, a suitable patient is selected, where the patient has one or more than one target tissue suitable for receiving a plurality of radiation beams. A suitable patient will be one having one or more than one target tissue having a disease or condition amenable to teletherapy, such as a solid tissue neoplasm, an arterio-venous malformations or Parkinson's disease. In a preferred embodiment, the patient will have a solid tissue neoplasm susceptible to radiation therapy, such as a neoplasm selected from the group consisting of acoustic neuroma, adenocarcinoma, astrocytoma, chordoma, meningioma, nasopharyngeal carcinoma and pituitary adenoma.


Then, a treatment plan is produced using conventional methods. For example, the patient is registered and immobilized to a patient positioner of a scanner, such as an XCT scanner or other suitable device, using appropriate registration and immobilization procedures, and the patient is scanned. The information from the scan is then transferred to a treatment planning system, and the treatment plan is produced.


Next, the patient is aligned such that the target tissue within the patient is at the beamline center of the radiation beam delivery device for delivering a first beam of radiation to the target tissue. In one embodiment, the patient is aligned using a two-stage patient positioner device for aligning a patient for delivering a plurality of radiation beams according to the present invention. This can be accomplished, for example as follows.



FIG. 18 is a flowchart illustrating one embodiment of a method of positioning a patient for receiving radiation treatment. First, the target location within the patient is determined relative to a reference point of the patient positioner. Then, the room coordinates for the patient positioner coarse alignment subsystem that are required to place the radiation beam delivery device beamline center at the target location within the patient are calculated, and these coordinates are transferred into a patient positioner database to generate a position file. Next, the patient is taken to the treatment room and the patient is registered and immobilized to the patient positioner using the identical registration and immobilization devices used for generating the treatment plan. Then, the fine alignment subsystem is centered to a neutral position and the coarse alignment subsystem is used to place the target tissue within the patient close to the beamline center for the radiation beam delivery device using the reference point of the patient positioner. Then, the target tissue location is determined using conventional methods, such as using localization x-ray images, and any discrepancy between the target tissue's present location and the target tissue's desired location is calculated. Next, the patient positioner fine alignment subsystem is used to place the target tissue within the patient at the beamline center for the radiation beam delivery device at the first device position.


In some embodiments, a method of aligning a patient for delivering multiple beams of radiation comprises the following steps. First, the patient is registered and immobilized to the patient positioner of an XCT scanner, or other suitable device, using an appropriate registration device and an appropriate immobilization device. Then, an XCT scan of the patient is performed. The XCT images are transferred to a treatment planning system and a treatment plan is developed.


Next, the target location for the isocenter within the patient is determined relative to a reference point of the patient positioner. Then, calculations are made of the room co-ordinates of the treatment gantry patient positioner base sub-system that are required to place the gantry isocenter at the target location within the patient. These co-ordinates are entered into a patient positioner database to generate a position file.


Then, the patient is taken to the treatment room. The gantry snout is preferably retracted to avoid a possible collision with the patient or equipment and the gantry is rotated to a beam delivery angle of 0°. The patient is registered and immobilized to the patient positioner using the identical registration and immobilization devices used for performing the XCT scan.


Next, an operator commands the patient positioner to center the fine alignment subsystem using an automatic zeroing command. Then, the operator manually drives the patient positioner base sub-system to place the location of the target within the patient within a few centimeters of the virtual isocenter of the gantry. The orientation of the patient positioner at this time approximately matches the prescribed orientation.


Next, the patient's position file that was previously generated is loaded and the operator commands the patient positioner base sub-system to “go to” the loaded position, thereby placing the target within the patient within a few millimeters of the virtual isocenter. The operator then commands the patient positioner base sub-system to move to the next radiation field, either by “turn wheels for yaw” or “turn wheels to isocenter” as needed.


Then, a localization image, such as an x-ray, is taken with either an electronic imaging device or film. The gantry is rotated to 90° and another localization image is taken orthogonally to the first localization image.


Next, a patient alignment algorithm uses the two localization images to compute the discrepancy between the patient's current location and orientation and the prescribed location and orientation. The therapist verifies the miss-alignment and suggested move and activates an enable switch on the patient positioner. The patient positioner fine alignment sub-system automatically rotates and translates the patient to correct for the difference in location and orientation.


After the initial miss-alignment has been corrected, the therapist commands the patient positioner to “set reference isocenter.” This command determines the gantry arrival direction and queries sensors that measure the gantry rotation angle, snout extension, snout delta (skewness), and all patient positioner positions. Then, the aperture and bolus for the field are installed into the snout, the gantry rotated to the treatment angle, and the snout extended to its treatment position.


The operator then commands the patient positioner fine alignment sub-system to “compensate isocenter.” This command queries the gantry rotation angle, gantry arrival direction, snout extension, snout delta, and all patient positioner positions. The system then automatically compares the projection of the beam central axis at the reference gantry angle and the current gantry angle based on pre-measured data sets. Referring now to FIG. 1 and FIG. 2, there are shown plots of pre-measured data sets in the plane of gantry rotation and perpendicular to the plane of rotation. The system then calculates the required move of the fine alignment subsystem of the positioner to compensate for the difference.


The therapist activates the enable switch and the fine alignment sub-system automatically translates the patient in all three directions to compensate for the gantry sag, gantry arrival direction, snout sag, and snout skewness. Then, the operator delivers the treatment beam. The snout is retracted and the gantry rotated to 90°. The steps disclosed in this paragraph are then repeated for each additional treatment field until the treatment has been completed.


After the patient is aligned, a first radiation beam from the first device position is delivered to the target tissue within the patient. Next, the radiation beam delivery device is moved to a second device position. Then, flexion of the radiation beam delivery device produced by the move to the second device position is compensated for using the set of predetermined data describing the flexion behavior of the radiation beam delivery device so that the target tissue within the patient is placed at the beamline center for the radiation beam delivery device at the second device position. In a preferred embodiment, compensation is accomplished by moving the patient and patient positioner as a unit, such as by using a two-stage patient positioner device according to the present invention. In another preferred embodiment, compensation is accomplished by one or more than one action selected from the group consisting of shifting an aperture or block holding cone with respect to the center of the beam delivery apparatus, shifting the position of the defining collimators of the beam delivery apparatus (such as the leaves of a multi-leaf collimator), and offsetting the scan pattern of a magnetically scanned beam, where each of these actions can be combined with rotation of the gantry as necessary to maintain the direction and the aiming point of the beam, as will be understood by those with skill in the art with reference to this disclosure. Next, a second radiation beam from the second device position is delivered to the target tissue within the patient.


The present method can also be used with other therapy delivery techniques, including serial (fan beam) tomotherapy, spiral (helical) tomotherapy, intensity modulated arc therapy (IMAT), cone beam dynamic therapy (sliding window), or cone beam segmental therapy (step and shoot), as well as being used for diagnostic radiation exposures, as will be understood by those with skill in the art with reference to this disclosure.


Although the present invention has been discussed in considerable detail with reference to certain preferred embodiments, other embodiments are possible. Therefore, the scope of the appended claims should not be limited to the description of preferred embodiments contained in this disclosure.

Claims
  • 1. A method of reproducibly interfacing a patient with a radiation delivery device, the method comprising: placing the patient on a patient positioner in a reproducible manner;fixing and attaching the patient to the patient positioner so that the patient and the patient positioner move together as a single unit in a controlled fashion;providing a desired orientation and location of a radiation dose based at least in part on the location, orientation, and shape of a treatment area of the patient;determining the location of the treatment area of the patient relative to a virtual isocenter of a diagnostic, simulation or treatment unit, comprising the steps of: placing the patient positioner such that the treatment area of the patient is within a few centimeters of the virtual isocenter;creating a first localization image with an imaging device;creating a second localization image with an imaging device, where the second localization image is taken from an angle which is approximately orthogonal to the angle of the first localization image;determining a current orientation and location of the treatment area with respect to the virtual isocenter using at least the first and second localization images; andcomputing a discrepancy between the current orientation and location of the treatment area with respect to the virtual isocenter and the desired orientation and location of the radiation dose;accounting for the computed discrepancy to move the patient positioner with respect to the virtual isocenter in order to place the patient according to the desired orientation and location of a radiation dose; andverifying the position of the patient positioner such that that the treatment area of the patient is positioned with respect to the virtual isocenter according to the desired orientation and location of a radiation dose.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the patient positioner is a movable table configured to reproducibly position a patient with at least six degrees of freedom, such as perpendicular translation motions including longitudinal, lateral, and vertical, and rotational motions including roll, pitch, and yaw, and wherein accounting for the computed discrepancy comprises using the rotational motions of the patient positioner to rotate the patient positioner to correct for the computed discrepancy between the current orientation of the patient positioner with respect to the virtual isocenter and the desired orientation of the radiation dose.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, where the radiation delivery device is an isocentric gantry which houses a beam delivery system and includes at least one of a particle accelerator, an x-ray tube, a beam spreading device, a beam limiting collimator, a particle range modifier, a fluence modifying device, a dose monitoring detector, or a beam aiming device.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, where fixing and attaching the patient to the patient positioner comprises immobilizing the patient using at least one of a thermoplastic net, a whole body pod, a foam cradle, a face mask, a cranial halo, or a bite block.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, where placing the patient positioner such that the treatment area of the patient is within a few centimeters of a virtual isocenter comprises: providing a position file, generated based at least in part on a treatment plan developed by a treatment planning system; andusing the position file to move the patient positioner such that a treatment area of the patient is within a few millimeters of a virtual isocenter of the radiation delivery device.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, where the position file is generated based at least in part on (a) a determination of a target location for the virtual isocenter within the patient relative to a reference point on the patient positioner and (b) a calculation made of the room coordinates of a treatment gantry patient positioner base sub-system required to place a gantry isocenter at the target location within the patient.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, where verifying the position of the patient positioner comprises the steps of: creating a third localization image on an imaging device;creating a fourth localization image on an imaging device, where the fourth localization image is taken from an angle which is approximately orthogonal to the angle of the third localization image;determining an adjusted current location of the treatment area with respect to the virtual isocenter of the radiation delivery device using at least the third and fourth localization images; andcomputing a second discrepancy between the adjusted current location of the treatment area with respect to the virtual isocenter of the radiation delivery device and the desired orientation and location of the radiation dose.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, further comprising the step of compensating for a deflection of the radiation delivery device by using one or more sets of pre-measured data from one or more alignment procedures in order to allow a patient to be irradiated from multiple gantry directions without realignment.
  • 9. The method of claim 8, where a single set of pre-measured data from a single alignment procedure is used to compensate for the deflection of the radiation delivery device.
  • 10. A patient alignment device for delivering multiple beams of radiation, the device allowing for more efficient alignment of the patient than conventional methods, the patient alignment device comprising: a two-stage patient positioner, the two-stage patient positioner comprising: a first stage comprising a coarse alignment subsystem capable of providing large traversals or rotations within a treatment room to place a patient near a radiation beam treatment location;a second stage comprising a fine alignment subsystem to correct initial miss-alignments near the radiation beam treatment location, provide proper orientation, and/or to compensate for deflections in a radiation beam delivery apparatus when multiple field directions are applied; andthe two-stage patient positioner configured to reproducibly position a patient with at least six degrees of freedom, including perpendicular translation motions including longitudinal, lateral, and vertical, and rotational motions including roll, pitch, and yaw, the two-stage patient positioner thereby configured to compensate for rotational misalignments around one or more axes without requiring the patient to be re-registered to the patient positioner.
  • 11. The device of claim 10, where the fine alignment system is configured to reproducibly position a patient based at least in part on one or more localization images.
  • 12. The device of claim 10, where the fine alignment system is configured to move the patient positioner in one or more of the three perpendicular translations for a distance up to about +/−20 millimeters with a resolution of about 0.1 millimeters.
  • 13. The device of claim 10, where the fine alignment system is configured to move the patient positioner in one or more of the three rotational motions up to about +/−5 degrees with a resolution of about 0.1 degrees.
  • 14. A patient alignment device for delivering multiple beams of radiation, the device allowing for more efficient alignment of the patient than conventional methods, the patient alignment device comprising: a multiple-stage patient positioner configured to reproducibly immobilize a patient so that the patient and the multiple-stage patient positioner move together as a single unit in a controlled fashion;the multiple-stage patient positioner configured to reproducibly position a patient with at least six degrees of freedom, including perpendicular translation motions including longitudinal, lateral, and vertical, and rotational motions including roll, pitch, and yaw, the multiple-stage patient positioner thereby configured to compensate for a deflection of a radiation delivery device in order to align the patient more quickly and accurately.
  • 15. The device of claim 14, where the multiple-stage patient positioner is able to compensate for a deflection of a radiation delivery device by using one or more set of pre-measured data from one or more alignment procedures in order to allow a patient to be irradiated from multiple directions without requiring realignment.
  • 16. The device of claim 14, where the multiple-stage patient positioner is able to compensate for a deflection of a radiation delivery device by using a single set of pre-measured data from a single alignment procedure in order to allow a patient to be irradiated from multiple directions without requiring realignment.
  • 17. The device of claim 14, where the multiple-stage patient positioner is a two-stage patient positioner.
  • 18. The device of claim 14, where the patient positioner is configured to reproducibly immobilize a patient using at least one of a thermoplastic net, a whole body pod, a foam cradle, a face mask, a cranial halo, or a bite block.
  • 19. The device of claim 14, where the multiple-stage patient positioner is configured to position a patient using perpendicular translation motions with a resolution of about 0.05 millimeters and an accuracy of better than about 0.1 millimeters.
  • 20. The device of claim 14, where the multiple-stage patient positioner is configured to position a patient using perpendicular translation motions with a resolution of about 0.1 degrees and an accuracy of better than about 0.1 degrees.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present Application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/877,019, filed Sep. 7, 2010, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/033,843, filed Feb. 19, 2008, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,789,560, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/314,138, filed Dec. 21, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,331,713, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/887,507, filed Jul. 7, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,011,447, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/393,836, filed Mar. 20, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,769,806, which claims priority from International Patent Application PCT/US02/34556, titled “Method and Device for Delivering Radiotherapy,” filed Oct. 28, 2002, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application 60/340,430, filed Oct. 30, 2001, titled “Method and Device for Delivering Radiotherapy.” The entire disclosure of each of the foregoing is incorporated herein by reference.

STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

This invention was made with United States Government support under Cooperative Agreement Number DAMD17-97-2-7016 with the National Medical Technology Testbed, Inc., United States Department of the Army. The United States Government has certain rights in this invention.

US Referenced Citations (256)
Number Name Date Kind
2469084 Schenker May 1949 A
2675564 Hughes Apr 1954 A
3397411 Rossi Aug 1968 A
3449570 Kok Jun 1969 A
3545739 D'Avignon Dec 1970 A
3556455 Storm Jan 1971 A
3604931 Kastner et al. Sep 1971 A
3640787 Heller Feb 1972 A
3689949 Weinstein et al. Sep 1972 A
3745998 Rose Jul 1973 A
3762404 Sakita Oct 1973 A
3778049 Viamonte, Jr. Dec 1973 A
3848132 Foderaro Nov 1974 A
3851644 Slagle Dec 1974 A
3885258 Regan May 1975 A
3893198 Blair Jul 1975 A
3897345 Foster Jul 1975 A
3897777 Morrison Aug 1975 A
3901588 Longhenry Aug 1975 A
3905054 Windsor et al. Sep 1975 A
3947686 Cooper et al. Mar 1976 A
3986697 Amor, Jr. et al. Oct 1976 A
4034224 Heavens et al. Jul 1977 A
4064401 Marden Dec 1977 A
4190772 Dinwiddie et al. Feb 1980 A
4230129 LeVeen Oct 1980 A
4252594 Cooper Feb 1981 A
4256112 Kopf et al. Mar 1981 A
4262204 Mirabella Apr 1981 A
4269512 Nosler May 1981 A
4287425 Elliot, Jr. Sep 1981 A
4327046 Davis et al. Apr 1982 A
4347213 Rogers, Jr. Aug 1982 A
4365341 Lam Dec 1982 A
4392239 Wilkens Jul 1983 A
4400820 O'Dell et al. Aug 1983 A
4450122 Gallina May 1984 A
4484571 Velasquez Nov 1984 A
4504050 Osborne Mar 1985 A
4552508 Reid Nov 1985 A
4578757 Stark Mar 1986 A
4591341 Andrews May 1986 A
4616814 Harwood-Nash et al. Oct 1986 A
4666304 Davies May 1987 A
4671284 Wilson et al. Jun 1987 A
4682818 Morell Jul 1987 A
4688780 Hanz Aug 1987 A
4705955 Mileikowsky Nov 1987 A
4711578 Chaimowicz Dec 1987 A
4752064 Voss Jun 1988 A
4779858 Saussereau Oct 1988 A
4796613 Heumann et al. Jan 1989 A
4819257 Grasser et al. Apr 1989 A
4841965 Jacobs Jun 1989 A
4905267 Miller et al. Feb 1990 A
4917344 Prechter et al. Apr 1990 A
4926457 Poehner et al. May 1990 A
4979519 Chavarria et al. Dec 1990 A
5014290 Moore et al. May 1991 A
5017789 Young et al. May 1991 A
5046708 Schaefer Sep 1991 A
5048071 Van Steenburg Sep 1991 A
5049147 Danon Sep 1991 A
5054049 Manabe Oct 1991 A
5081665 Kostich Jan 1992 A
5090047 Angotti et al. Feb 1992 A
5117829 Miller et al. Jun 1992 A
5156166 Sebring Oct 1992 A
5168514 Horton, Jr. et al. Dec 1992 A
5207688 Carol May 1993 A
5230623 Guthrie et al. Jul 1993 A
5240218 Dye Aug 1993 A
5242455 Skeens et al. Sep 1993 A
5269305 Corol Dec 1993 A
5276927 Day Jan 1994 A
5278886 Kobiki et al. Jan 1994 A
5279309 Taylor et al. Jan 1994 A
5281232 Hamilton et al. Jan 1994 A
5287576 Fraser Feb 1994 A
5297262 Cox et al. Mar 1994 A
5361765 Herlihy et al. Nov 1994 A
5370117 McLaurin, Jr. Dec 1994 A
5370118 Vij et al. Dec 1994 A
5380336 Misko et al. Jan 1995 A
5388580 Sullivan et al. Feb 1995 A
5427097 Depp Jun 1995 A
5446548 Gerig et al. Aug 1995 A
5454993 Kostich Oct 1995 A
5464411 Schulte et al. Nov 1995 A
5485833 Dietz Jan 1996 A
5531229 Dean et al. Jul 1996 A
5538494 Matsuda Jul 1996 A
5549616 Schulte Aug 1996 A
5553112 Hardy et al. Sep 1996 A
5566681 Manwaring et al. Oct 1996 A
5570409 Yamaguchi et al. Oct 1996 A
5588430 Bova et al. Dec 1996 A
5595191 Kirk Jan 1997 A
5622187 Carol Apr 1997 A
5675851 Feathers Oct 1997 A
5676673 Ferre et al. Oct 1997 A
5727554 Kalend et al. Mar 1998 A
5745545 Hughes Apr 1998 A
5751781 Brown et al. May 1998 A
5771512 Kurakake et al. Jun 1998 A
5775337 Hauger et al. Jul 1998 A
5797924 Schulte et al. Aug 1998 A
5800352 Ferre et al. Sep 1998 A
5806116 Oliver et al. Sep 1998 A
5820444 McGaughey Oct 1998 A
5820553 Hughes Oct 1998 A
5823192 Kalend et al. Oct 1998 A
5832550 Hauger et al. Nov 1998 A
5848449 Hauger et al. Dec 1998 A
5851182 Sahadevan Dec 1998 A
5865832 Knopp et al. Feb 1999 A
5911655 Brenneisen Jun 1999 A
5947981 Cosman Sep 1999 A
5983424 Näslund Nov 1999 A
6003174 Kantrowitz et al. Dec 1999 A
6023694 Kouchi et al. Feb 2000 A
6026392 Kouchi et al. Feb 2000 A
6085227 Edlund et al. Jul 2000 A
6094760 Nonaka et al. Aug 2000 A
6118848 Reiffel Sep 2000 A
6144875 Schweikard et al. Nov 2000 A
6144993 Fukunaga et al. Nov 2000 A
6148272 Bergstrom et al. Nov 2000 A
6161237 Tang et al. Dec 2000 A
6178430 Cohen et al. Jan 2001 B1
6180942 Tracy et al. Jan 2001 B1
6182060 Hedgcock et al. Jan 2001 B1
6195578 Distler et al. Feb 2001 B1
6200025 Rich Mar 2001 B1
6244745 Mattern Jun 2001 B1
6275564 Ein-Gal Aug 2001 B1
6279579 Riaziat et al. Aug 2001 B1
6282739 Livingston Sep 2001 B1
6308353 Van Steenburg Oct 2001 B1
6313915 Yanagisawa et al. Nov 2001 B1
6325758 Carol et al. Dec 2001 B1
6345114 Mackie et al. Feb 2002 B1
6375355 Fortin Apr 2002 B1
6376846 Livingston Apr 2002 B2
6405072 Cosman Jun 2002 B1
6446286 Karmalawy Sep 2002 B1
6452999 Maida Sep 2002 B1
6460206 Blasche et al. Oct 2002 B1
6462553 Badura Oct 2002 B1
6473490 Siochi Oct 2002 B1
6476403 Dolinskii et al. Nov 2002 B1
6505245 North et al. Jan 2003 B1
6509573 Badura et al. Jan 2003 B1
6565577 Cosman May 2003 B2
6598275 Kolody et al. Jul 2003 B1
6614038 Brand et al. Sep 2003 B1
6621889 Mostafavi Sep 2003 B1
6650930 Ding Nov 2003 B2
6662036 Cosman Dec 2003 B2
6670618 Hartmann et al. Dec 2003 B1
6677597 Haberer et al. Jan 2004 B1
6690965 Riaziat et al. Feb 2004 B1
6693283 Eickhoff et al. Feb 2004 B2
6698045 Coppens et al. Mar 2004 B1
6704957 Rhodes Mar 2004 B2
6725078 Bucholz et al. Apr 2004 B2
6754299 Patch Jun 2004 B2
6769806 Moyers Aug 2004 B2
6780149 Schulte Aug 2004 B1
6795523 Steinberg Sep 2004 B2
6799068 Hartmann et al. Sep 2004 B1
6804548 Takahashi et al. Oct 2004 B2
6813788 Dinkler et al. Nov 2004 B2
6814694 Pedroni Nov 2004 B1
6822244 Beloussov et al. Nov 2004 B2
6839404 Clark et al. Jan 2005 B2
6891177 Kraft et al. May 2005 B1
6977987 Yamashita et al. Dec 2005 B2
7011447 Moyers Mar 2006 B2
7076821 DeMooy Jul 2006 B2
7084410 Beloussov et al. Aug 2006 B2
7120223 Nafstadius Oct 2006 B2
7142634 Engler et al. Nov 2006 B2
7154108 Tadokoro et al. Dec 2006 B2
7154991 Earnst et al. Dec 2006 B2
7173265 Miller et al. Feb 2007 B2
7199382 Rigney et al. Apr 2007 B2
7207715 Yue Apr 2007 B2
7280633 Cheng et al. Oct 2007 B2
7301162 Matsuda et al. Nov 2007 B2
7331713 Moyers Feb 2008 B2
7348579 Pedroni Mar 2008 B2
7368740 Beloussov et al. May 2008 B2
7372053 Yamashita et al. May 2008 B2
7398309 Baumann et al. Jul 2008 B2
7446328 Rigney et al. Nov 2008 B2
7560717 Matsuda et al. Jul 2009 B2
7789560 Moyers Sep 2010 B2
20020032378 Henderson et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020051513 Pugachev et al. May 2002 A1
20020065461 Cosman May 2002 A1
20020077545 Takahashi et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020095730 Al-Kassim et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020120986 Erbel et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020188194 Cosman Dec 2002 A1
20020193685 Mate et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030007601 Jaffray et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030031301 Longton et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030164459 Schardt et al. Sep 2003 A1
20040013414 Karger et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040028188 Amann et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040034438 Uematsu Feb 2004 A1
20040034932 Zacharopoulos et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040042583 Wackerle et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040082856 Marmarelis Apr 2004 A1
20040098445 Baumann et al. May 2004 A1
20040123388 Coppens et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040155206 Marchand et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040158145 Ghelmansarai et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040164254 Beloussov et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040174958 Moriyama et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040184583 Nagamine et al. Sep 2004 A1
20050054910 Tremblay et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050072940 Beloussov et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050116175 Haberer Jun 2005 A1
20050161618 Pedroni Jul 2005 A1
20050226377 Wong et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050281374 Cheng et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060002511 Miller et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060017022 Rigney et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060183960 Sioshansi et al. Aug 2006 A1
20070018120 Beloussov et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070018121 Leyman et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070025524 Yue Feb 2007 A1
20070031337 Schulte Feb 2007 A1
20070039621 Moyers Feb 2007 A1
20070093100 Sommer Apr 2007 A1
20070108922 Amaldi May 2007 A1
20070158592 Hiramoto et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070164230 Rigney et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070262269 Trbojevic Nov 2007 A1
20080005643 Park et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080031414 Coppens Feb 2008 A1
20080042076 Miller et al. Feb 2008 A1
20080056434 Grozinger et al. Mar 2008 A1
20080187097 Cheng et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080189859 Sloan et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080191142 Pedroni Aug 2008 A1
20080192892 Dilmanian et al. Aug 2008 A1
20080237494 Beloussov et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080292053 Marash et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080317216 Lifshitz et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090067577 Rigney et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090154645 Lifshitz et al. Jun 2009 A1
20090202045 Guertin et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090217456 Lempen et al. Sep 2009 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (70)
Number Date Country
2513896 Oct 1975 DE
2833800 Dec 1979 DE
3643893 Jun 1988 DE
44 18 216 Nov 1995 DE
19612091 Mar 1997 DE
102005034912 Feb 2007 DE
019136 Nov 1980 EP
247449 Dec 1987 EP
0 283 082 Sep 1988 EP
465590 Jan 1992 EP
480035 Apr 1992 EP
809525 Dec 1997 EP
986070 Mar 2000 EP
986071 Mar 2000 EP
1064881 Jan 2001 EP
1454653 Sep 2004 EP
1584353 Oct 2005 EP
1585578 Oct 2005 EP
1709994 Oct 2006 EP
1792595 Jun 2007 EP
1795229 Jun 2007 EP
1900392 Mar 2008 EP
1935453 Jun 2008 EP
2701391 Aug 1994 FR
0870225 Jun 1961 GB
1362678 Aug 1974 GB
2213066 Aug 1989 GB
2254691 Oct 1992 GB
61-194400 Aug 1986 JP
63-206261 Aug 1988 JP
H03-094736 Apr 1991 JP
H04-339282 Nov 1992 JP
H07-204184 Aug 1995 JP
2003-527763 Sep 2003 JP
7309246 Oct 1974 NL
WO 8801848 Mar 1988 WO
WO 9011721 Oct 1990 WO
WO 9011723 Oct 1990 WO
WO 9625200 Aug 1996 WO
WO 9852646 Nov 1998 WO
WO 9910137 Mar 1999 WO
WO 0059575 Oct 2000 WO
WO 0100276 Jan 2001 WO
WO 0189625 Nov 2001 WO
WO 0245793 Jun 2002 WO
WO 03039212 May 2003 WO
WO 03053520 Jul 2003 WO
WO 03076016 Sep 2003 WO
WO 2004026401 Apr 2004 WO
WO 2004032781 Apr 2004 WO
WO 2004060486 Jul 2004 WO
WO 2005018734 Mar 2005 WO
WO 2005018735 Mar 2005 WO
WO 2005037167 Apr 2005 WO
WO 2005102453 Nov 2005 WO
WO 2006060886 Jun 2006 WO
WO 2006076545 Jul 2006 WO
WO 2006094533 Sep 2006 WO
WO 2007012646 Feb 2007 WO
WO 2007016022 Feb 2007 WO
WO 2007054140 May 2007 WO
WO 2007061426 May 2007 WO
WO 2007062788 Jun 2007 WO
WO 2007068066 Jun 2007 WO
WO 2007127970 Nov 2007 WO
WO 2008003526 Jan 2008 WO
WO 2008051358 May 2008 WO
WO 2008064271 May 2008 WO
WO 2008081480 Jul 2008 WO
WO 2008142695 Nov 2008 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (9)
Entry
“Dedicated Medical Ion Accelerator Design Study” by Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, et al., Dec. 1977, PCTA008295-PCTA008455.
“Design of a Proton Therapy Synchrotron” by Fermilab National Accelerator Laboratory, Jun. 1986, LL467-LL574.
“Proceedings of a Medical Workshop on Accelerators for Charged-Particle Beam Therapy” by Fermilab, Jan. 1985, LL33170-LL33313.
“Product Overview” by BrainLAB Radiotherapy Solutions, Copyright 2004 BrainLAB AG.
“Proton Therapy Facility: Engineering Design Report” by Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory, Feb. 1987, LL45441-LL45570.
“Proton Therapy System” by Brobeck Corporation, Nov. 1985, LL54413-LL54459.
Matsu'ura, Jun, “Systems for Overall Control and Beam Transport of the HIMAC,” Mitsubishi Electric Advance, Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Tokyo, JP, vol. 72, Sep. 1995, pp. 5-7.
European Search Report for Application No. 02789303.1, filed Oct. 28, 2002.
International Search Report for PCT/US02/34556, filed Oct. 28, 2002.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20120045038 A1 Feb 2012 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60340430 Oct 2001 US
Continuations (6)
Number Date Country
Parent 12877019 Sep 2010 US
Child 13284701 US
Parent 12033843 Feb 2008 US
Child 12877019 US
Parent 11314138 Dec 2005 US
Child 12033843 US
Parent 10887507 Jul 2004 US
Child 11314138 US
Parent 10393836 Mar 2003 US
Child 10887507 US
Parent PCT/US02/34556 Oct 2002 US
Child 10393836 US