The present invention relates to a method and a device for detecting objects in the surroundings of a vehicle.
Devices for detecting objects in the surroundings of a vehicle include those device which monitor the blind spot of a vehicle, which are known as blind spot detection systems (BSD systems). These systems are generally used for electronically detecting objects in the surroundings of the vehicle which are difficult for the driver to observe without turning his/her head to the side. Such head turning (looking over the shoulder) is not possible in many cases because of the associated neglect of the traffic situation ahead. In particular on multi-lane roads, a BSD system signals to the driver of a vehicle when another vehicle (object) is passing at a lower differential velocity, thereby remaining in the blind spot to the right or left of the vehicle longer than only an instant. The danger of an accident because of overlooking other vehicles during a lane change may be reduced due to such information being available to the driver.
According to the known art, sensors for detecting external vehicles (objects) or for evaluating collision scenarios are used in vehicles. These sensors use ultrasonic, radar, or light waves to detect the existence of objects in a contactless manner and are also able to measure the vehicle's distance to the objects.
A device for detecting objects in the blind spot of a vehicle described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,583,495 includes individual ultrasonic waves which are generated at a predefined angle via a signal generator. The ultrasonic waves, subsequently reflected or scattered by a potential object, are received and amplified by an ultrasonic receiver. A point in time of a potential collision between the object and the host vehicle is calculated from this ultrasonic signal, the vehicle's velocity, and the vehicle's steering angle. Moreover, the device described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,583,495 has means for communicating with the driver which, in the event of a likely collision with an object situated in the blind spot, trigger an alert or inform the driver in another suitable way.
A disadvantage of the known ultrasound-based BSD systems is their particularly long response time. Due to the lower propagation rate of sound waves (compared to radar waves or light waves), the measuring time of ultrasound-based BSD systems is longer than the measuring time of comparable radar-based or light wave-based BSD systems. The response time of the system is longer due to the longer measuring time so that, in the event of a potential collision with an object in the blind spot, the appropriate warning to the driver is delayed. However, the use of faster radar sensors or light sensors entails a substantial cost disadvantage.
Therefore, it is an object of the present invention to provide a method and a device for detecting objects in the surroundings of a vehicle via which a shorter measuring time and consequently a shorter response time are facilitated for alerting the driver in the event of an imminent collision with an object in the vehicle's surroundings. This makes it possible in particular to use cost-effective ultrasonic sensors.
In contrast to conventional BSD systems, the main advantage of the present invention is the rapid response time of a BSD system according to the present invention. Due to the fact that the frequency and/or the width of a measuring signal is/are set as a function of the predetermined distance between the vehicle and the object, it is possible according to the present invention to increase the sampling rate proportionately to the decrease in the distance between the vehicle and the object. This makes it possible to detect the closest object more rapidly, i.e., for the most relevant object for a potential collision to be detected, thereby generating an adequately early collision alert. The frequency of a measuring signal may be set reciprocally proportional to the determined distance between the vehicle and the object. This makes it possible in particular to implement an ultrasound-based BSD system which exhibits an adequately rapid response time. A substantial cost advantage may be achieved by using ultrasonic sensors.
By using the method according to the present invention, the surroundings of the vehicle are initially monitored using measuring technology within a relatively great distance (up to 3 m). If an object potentially eligible for a collision is detected within this distance, the frequency of the measuring signal and thus the sampling rate are increased, corresponding to the object's approach of the vehicle. Therefore, the method according to the present invention ensures that objects may be detected from an adequate distance (e.g., a range of 3 m), and it also ensures that the object behavior may be evaluated more accurately and more rapidly at a shorter distance (less than 3 m) since the object distance may be temporally better resolved due to the increased sampling rate (increased frequency of the measuring signal).
With the aid of this improved and more real-time knowledge of the object behavior relative to the vehicle's position, and with the aid of additional data, e.g., the vehicle velocity and the steering angle, and/or the yaw angle, a conclusion may be drawn about a possible collision time with adequate accuracy and adequate speed. An instantaneous collision alert may be output to the driver in particular given a change in the situation, e.g., a steering motion by the driver or a suddenly occurring fast approach of the object.
According to the present invention, the device for detecting an object in the surroundings of a vehicle includes:
a, 2b and 2c show a schematic representation of a sequence of the approach of an object situated in the blind spot of a vehicle.
d shows a graph illustrating the increase in the sampling rate as a function of the determined distance between the vehicle and the object.
While the method and device according to the present invention may be used for detecting objects in the entire surroundings of the vehicle, it is particularly advantageous to monitor the region of the surroundings which is not directly visible to the driver of the vehicle.
Regions, known as blind spots, which are not visible to the driver, even when using the vehicle mirrors, also appear in the vehicle's surroundings. Therefore, monitoring of this region around the vehicle is particularly desirable. The present invention is thus described below in the context of an example for monitoring the blind spot.
a, 2b, and 2c show an object 12, which is at least partially situated in blind spot 14, approaching a vehicle 10. In
The driver is alerted when the determined data indicates an imminent collision.
The present invention is not restricted to the exemplary embodiments described here.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
103 23 144 | May 2003 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2004/050514 | 4/14/2004 | WO | 00 | 2/21/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2004/104631 | 12/2/2004 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4083052 | Metcalf | Apr 1978 | A |
4209843 | Hyatt | Jun 1980 | A |
4214269 | Parker et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4491930 | Hyatt | Jan 1985 | A |
4788441 | Laskowski | Nov 1988 | A |
4910520 | Rosen et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4931930 | Shyu et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5208586 | Friberg et al. | May 1993 | A |
5359331 | Adler | Oct 1994 | A |
5410621 | Hyatt | Apr 1995 | A |
5583495 | Lulu | Dec 1996 | A |
5764299 | Jennes et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771077 | Jennes et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771078 | Jennes et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5905457 | Rashid | May 1999 | A |
6002639 | Birchak et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6259374 | Kisner et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6345228 | Lees | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6812884 | Richley et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
7082171 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7164117 | Breed et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7379515 | Johnson et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7554508 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
20030001772 | Woodington et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20040178947 | Richley et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050046584 | Breed | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060208169 | Breed et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070182587 | Danz | Aug 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2139702 | Aug 1993 | CN |
1791806 | Jun 2006 | CN |
10323144.7 | May 2003 | DE |
0 726 473 | Aug 1996 | EP |
1629302 | Mar 2006 | EP |
2 315 628 | Feb 1998 | GB |
54092101 | Jul 1979 | JP |
05288765 | Nov 1993 | JP |
05288767 | Nov 1993 | JP |
06187035 | Jul 1994 | JP |
06321099 | Nov 1994 | JP |
06321109 | Nov 1994 | JP |
09123868 | May 1997 | JP |
WO 9523079 | Aug 1995 | WO |
WO 2004104631 | Dec 2004 | WO |
PCTEP0450514 | Feb 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070182587 A1 | Aug 2007 | US |