This is a National Phase of International Application No. PCT/GB2004/002348, filed on June 3, 2004, which claims priority from Great Britain Patent Application No. 0316382.1, filed on July 12, 2003.
The present invention concerns a method and device for determining acceleration of a motor vehicle.
It is of course known to measure vehicle acceleration by means e.g. of some form of accelerometer, or alternatively by measuring the speed of the vehicle wheels and differentiating with respect to time. Unfortunately the vehicle, due to its suspension etc., and the driveline, due to its compliance, have dynamics exhibiting resonance at frequencies which can be as low as 2 Hz in motor cars and still lower in larger vehicles. This can create corresponding oscillation in measured acceleration signals. Signal noise can also be a problem. The signal can be filtered to improve its quality but a filter with a time constant long enough to remove the low frequency oscillation would introduce an appreciable time lag.
The problem is experienced in connection with electronic systems for control of vehicle powertrains. The present invention has in fact been developed for use in a system which controls a powertrain using a continuously variable transmission of so-called “torque controlled” type (the term is known in the art and transmissions of this type have for example been described in European patent 832376 and its US counterpart U.S. Pat. No. 6,071,209, both granted to Torotrak (Development) Limited). In such transmissions variator ratio is not directly set, but instead transmission ratio is able to change in accordance with changes in engine and vehicle speed. To determine rate of ratio change, vehicle acceleration is required. The rate of ratio change is needed for various purposes in controlling the powertrain. If a simple low pass filter were used with a long enough time constant to remove the low frequency oscillation from a measured value of vehicle acceleration, the speed of response of the control system would be unacceptably compromised.
In accordance with a first aspect of the present invention there is a method of determining acceleration of a motor vehicle, comprising obtaining a high pass filtered acceleration signal and a low pass filtered acceleration signal, one of the filtered acceleration signals being obtained based upon net driving force applied to the vehicle and the other being obtained by measurement, and adding the two filtered acceleration signals to obtain an output signal representing vehicle acceleration.
Specific embodiments of the present invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
The embodiment of the invention to be described below provides improved quality signals representing both vehicle speed and vehicle acceleration and does so by using a combination of measured and predicted vehicle speed/acceleration values.
A predicted vehicle acceleration value is obtained on the basis of the force applied by the motor vehicle's powertrain and brakes. In
This signal ForceVehEstRaw is passed to a multiple order filter 20, which is seen in more detail in
The term “low pass filter” is well understood by those skilled in the art and is used here in its conventional sense, to refer to a filter which passes signal components below a chosen frequency (dictated by the time constant) but discriminates against higher frequencies. The term “high pass filter” will also be used herein and is again used in its conventional and well understood sense to refer to a filter whose transmission band extends upwards from a chosen frequency, lower frequencies being discriminated against.
The output from the filter 20 is a low pass filtered, estimated value ForceVehEstFilt (
The simplest possible model 28 would involve only division of the driving force ForceVehEstFilt by the vehicle mass. For greater accuracy it is necessary to take account of vehicle mass, road gradient, drag and potentially other factors. Mass and gradient are of course variable and are not directly measured. Hence a more sophisticated model is adaptive, making corrections to these variables based upon the vehicle's response.
AccVehEstHPFilt has been obtained based upon the vehicle mass and the force applied to it. Another way to obtain a value for vehicle acceleration is to measure vehicle speed and then differentiate with respect to time. In
At 34 the high pass filtered signal AccVehEstHPFilt is added to the low pass filtered signal AccVehFiltRaw to provide at 35 an output signal AccVehFilt which is a very close approximation to the true value of the vehicle acceleration, as trials have demonstrated. The low frequency noise due to drive line oscillation has been removed by virtue of the low pass filtering of the measured vehicle speed signal. The time lag introduced by the low pass filter has been corrected by addition of the high pass filtered estimate of acceleration based upon the transmission/brake force.
To now explain how a usable value of vehicle speed is obtained, note that the low pass filtered value of vehicle acceleration AccVehFiltRaw, obtained by differentiation of measured vehicle speed, is led to a multiplier 36 which also receives the time constant TC of the multiple pass filter 20. Multiplying AccVehFiltRaw by TC gives an offset SpdVehFiltOfst which is an estimate of the difference between the actual and filtered values of the vehicle speed introduced due to the time lag from the filter 20. Adding this offset at 38 to the low pass filtered measured vehicle speed signal, SpdVehFiltBase gives an improved, filtered vehicle speed signal SpdVehFilt.
A reset function 42 receives the measured and the filtered vehicle speed signals SpdVeh and SpdVehFilt and resets the filter 20 when these indicate that the vehicle is stationary. All of the functions illustrated in
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0316382.1 | Jul 2003 | GB | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/GB2004/002348 | 6/3/2004 | WO | 00 | 7/10/2006 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2005/015244 | 2/17/2005 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5012417 | Watanabe et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5123714 | Mori | Jun 1992 | A |
5402345 | Kost | Mar 1995 | A |
5425574 | Sano | Jun 1995 | A |
5579230 | Lin et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5615933 | Kidston et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5706196 | Romstadt | Jan 1998 | A |
5873639 | Takahashi et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
6071209 | Greenwood | Jun 2000 | A |
6202780 | Tanaka et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6349255 | Heckmann et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6370459 | Phillips | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6614343 | Fennel et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6697611 | Franca-Neto | Feb 2004 | B1 |
20020036429 | Shimada et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020075142 | Foo et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020075143 | Foo et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020099490 | Wakamatsu et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030058118 | Wilson | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030141128 | Hessmert et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030158648 | Kubota et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040166824 | Franca-Neto | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040176899 | Hallowell | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199300 | Gustafsson et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050000305 | Yamada et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20060074558 | Williamson et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20090123009 | Roeck et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
43 28 893 | Mar 1994 | DE |
0832376 | Apr 1998 | EP |
1 013 523 | Jun 2000 | EP |
1 085 312 | Mar 2001 | EP |
WO 9946604 | Sep 1999 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/GB2004/002348, mailed Sep. 13, 2004, 16 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070112495 A1 | May 2007 | US |