The present invention relates in general to the field of lighting using a plurality of dimmable light sources. Particularly, but not exclusively, the present invention relates to a lighting device comprising two or more dimmable light sources of mutually different color for producing output light with an output color that is a mixture of the colors of the contributing light sources. Since the light sources as used in practice are typically LEDs, the light sources will hereinafter simply be indicated as LEDs, but it is noted that this is not intended to limit the protective scope since the present invention can also be practiced with other types of light sources, for instance discharge lamps.
A LED typically generates light within a narrow spectral range, which can be indicated as a point in a color space. With two LEDs of different color, the human observer will observe a resulting mix color having a color point on the line connecting the two color points corresponding to the two LED colors. The exact position on this line, i.e. the exact mix color, depends on the intensity ratio of the respective light outputs of the respective LEDs, while the intensity of the mix color can be seen as a summation of the respective individual intensities. Likewise, with three LEDs of different color, it is possible to create any mix color within the triangle defined in the color space by the three color points corresponding to the three LED colors. In a typical example, a lighting device comprises three LEDs of red, green and blue colors, respectively, but other color combinations and/or additional colors are also possible. Further, it is known to add a fourth LED, typically generating white light, if increased output intensity is desired.
It is noted that, instead of one LED per color, the device may have a plurality (array, string) of preferably identical LEDs per color, which may be connected in series or parallel and be considered to constitute one light source.
It is noted that the above is commonly known to persons skilled in the art, so a further explanation of this general background art will be omitted.
In a lighting device, the individual intensities of the individual LEDs is controlled by a controller on the basis of an input signal that defines the desired output mix color. Given that the color points of the individual LEDs are known, there is, in the case of a three LED system, a one-to-one correspondence between the output mix color and the individual LED intensities, apart from a common multiplication factor that determines the overall intensity. In the case of four or more LEDs, there are more possibilities for setting the individual LED intensities to obtain the desired output mix color. In any case, on the basis of the input signal that defines the desired output mix color, the controller can determine the individual LED intensities, for instance by consulting a memory that contains information, for instance in the form of a look-up table or a formula, defining a relationship between output color and LED intensities.
A problem in this respect is accuracy and stability. On the basis of the information stored in the memory, the controller is only capable of determining setpoints or target values for the individual LED intensities, which are translated to setpoints or target values for the individual LED control signals generated by the controller. But it may be that the response by a LED to a control signal differs from expectations, for instance as a matter of tolerances or because it changes with time, temperature, etc. If the light output intensity (flux) of a LED is not correct, the resulting output mix color may deviate noticeably from the desired color.
In order to assure that each LED produces the correct intensity, it is necessary to provide for some feedback of the actually produced intensity to the controller. Such feedback can be provided by an optical detector, typically a photodiode. Although it is possible to use individual detectors per LED, a problem would be that different detectors may give different responses. Therefore, it is better to use one single detector with a wide sensitivity range, i.e. a detector sensitive to the different wavelengths produced by the different LEDs. Consequently, since it is intended to measure the individual light output of the individual LEDs, it is necessary to briefly switch off all LEDs except the one being measured. Since LEDs and photodiodes have short response times, a measuring event may take place within a very brief time window and the interruption of the non-measured LEDs may be very short. Nevertheless, the brief interruption of the non-measured LEDs constitutes a reduction of the average light output of these LEDs, and hence a deviation of the output color and reduction of the output light intensity, which, brief as it may be, may be noticeable.
In order to avoid these artefacts, the brief interruption of the light output of the non-measured LEDs during a measuring window is compensated by a brief increase of the light output of the non-measured LEDs outside such measuring window.
A device showing all the above features is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,445,139, and for a more elaborate background explanation reference is made to this document, of which the content is incorporated herein by reference.
Generally, the light intensity of a LED is proportional to the magnitude of the current through the LED. In the device as disclosed in said document, the light intensities of the LEDs are varied by varying the current magnitude. Thus, a LED is driven with a constant current magnitude, which magnitude is controlled to have a certain desired value. Immediately before and after a measuring window, the current is boosted to have a higher magnitude than the constant desired value. Thus, averaged over a time portion including the duration of the boost and the measuring window, the average current is equal to the desired value and hence the average light intensity is equal to the desired value.
A problem of the technique as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,445,139 is that this technique can only be applied in the case of lighting devices having variable current magnitude for varying the light intensity of a LED.
Varying the current magnitude requires relatively complicated drivers. In a more economic driver design, the magnitude of the LED current is maintained constant at a nominal value, and dimming of the LED (reducing the light intensity) is performed by duty cycle control. It is noted that duty cycle control is known per se. Briefly said, the LED is repeatedly switched on and off at a predetermined switching frequency, so that the LED substantially only produces light during the ON periods and substantially produces no light during the OFF periods; the average light output is determined by the duty cycle, i.e. the ratio of the duration of the ON period to the duration of the switching cycle.
An object of the present invention is to provide intensity compensation of the individual colors to accurately achieve the desired color point target for a lighting device having duty cycle control.
A lighting device with color control and having duty cycle control is disclosed in US-2008/0065345. One sensor detects the light output of the device during a measuring window when only one light source is active while the other sources are off. In this known device, as illustrated in
According to the present invention, if a LED current is interrupted for allowing intensity measurement of another LED, the interruption is compensated in another switching cycle, preferably the next switching cycle, by a corresponding increase of the duration of the ON phase. An advantage of this compensation method is that it can be implemented with a low-cost microcontroller.
Further advantageous elaborations are mentioned in the dependent claims.
These and other aspects, features and advantages of the present invention will be further explained by the following description of one or more preferred embodiments with reference to the drawings, in which same reference numerals indicate same or similar parts, and in which:
It is noted that each light source may be an individual LED, or an array or string of LEDs. Also, a light source may be of a different type.
Each light source 11, 12, 13, 14 may be provided with an individual driver 51, 52, 53, 54, respectively. The device 1 comprises a controller 40 having control outputs 41, 42, 43, 44 coupled to control inputs of the respective drivers 51, 52, 53, 54. At these control outputs 41, 42, 43, 44, the controller 40 generates control signals SC1, SC2, SC3, SC4, respectively, for the respective drivers 51, 52, 53, 54. It is noted that the drivers may be integrated in the controller, and that the controller is directly connected to the respective lamp.
Each driver is designed to generate lamp current of a constant magnitude, depending on the control signal received at its control input. Particularly, the control signal is a digital signal which can take two values, indicated as HIGH and LOW or “1” and “0”. If the control signal has one value, for instance LOW or “0”, the driver interrupts its lamp current and the corresponding light source is off. If the control signal has the other value, for instance HIGH or “1”, the driver produces its lamp current and the corresponding light source is on.
Referring to
In
t1B,2=t1B,3=t1B,4=t1B+τD
Thus, the feedback signal SF received by the controller 40 during this measuring time window 71 represents the actual light intensity of the first LED 11.
It is noted that the sensor 70 may be a triggered sensor, but it is easier that the sensor 70 provides a continuous output signal, which is simply ignored by the controller 40 outside the measuring time window 71, indicated by crosses in this signal. In fact, the controller 40 may just sample the feedback signal SF during the measuring time window 71B.
All control signals SC1, SC2, SC3, SC4 make the transition from HIGH back to LOW, i.e. from the ON phase to the OFF phase, at the same moment t2 as during normal operation. This can be expressed as:
t2B,i=t1B,1+τON,i, for i=1, 2, 3, 4
Thus, it should be clear that the duty cycle Δ2, Δ3, Δ4 of said other control signals SC2, SC3, SC4 has been reduced in this measuring mode. This is compensated in the third switching cycle 63C immediately following said second switching cycle 63B. In this third switching cycle 63C, the controller operates in a compensation mode. At time tic, all control signals SC1, SC2, SC3, SC4 make the transition from LOW to HIGH so that all LEDs 11, 12, 13, 14 are switched ON, as during normal operation. The first control signal SC1 makes the transition from HIGH back to LOW at the normal time t2C,1. For the other control signals SC2, SC3, SC4, the transition from HIGH back to LOW, i.e. from the ON phase to the OFF phase, is delayed by the same brief delay duration τD. This can be expressed as:
t2C,i=t1C+τON,i+τD, for i=2, 3, 4
Thus, averaged over the second and third switching cycles, the average duty cycle and hence the average light intensity for each of the other LEDs 12, 13, 14 is equal to the corresponding average over the first switching cycle.
It should be clear that a similar measuring mode follows in which the second LED 12 is measured, followed by a compensation mode, and the same applies to the remaining LEDs 13, 14. This is not illustrated for sake of convenience. It is noted that the next measuring mode can be performed in the next switching cycle immediately following the third switching cycle 63C, but it is also possible that the controller provides for one or more switching cycles with normal operation between a compensation mode and the subsequent measuring mode.
Further, it is possible that the controller 40 performs a measurement of the level of ambient or background light. In that case, the ON phases of all lighting sources are delayed during cycle 63B and compensated during the next cycle 63C. If all lighting sources are OFF, the feedback measurement signal SF from the sensor 70 represents the level of ambient or background light, and/or the dark current. This measurement allows the controller to correct the measurements of the light output of the different light sources by subtracting the background light. However, as long as all lighting sources are operated at a duty cycle less than 100%, their OFF phases have an overlap, particularly at the end of the switching cycles, and the controller can take the feedback measurement signal SF from the sensor 70 during such overlap as representing the level of ambient or background light.
Summarizing, the present invention provides a lighting device 1 comprising a plurality of LEDs 11-14 producing light 21-24 of mutually different colors. The LEDs are driven in switching cycles 63 with a duty cycle controlled supply current of constant magnitude. In each switching cycle, each LED is first switched ON and then switched OFF.
In a measuring mode, during one switching cycle 63B, all ON phases of all LEDs are briefly interrupted, except for one LED 11, so that a light sensor 70 measures the light from this one LED. This measurement can be used to adapt the duty cycle of this one LED. In the next switching cycle 63C, the interruption of the ON phases is compensated by extending the ON phases of all LEDs except said one LED, the extension having a duration equal to the duration τD of the interruption.
While the invention has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description, it should be clear to a person skilled in the art that such illustration and description are to be considered illustrative or exemplary and not restrictive. The invention is not limited to the disclosed embodiments; rather, several variations and modifications are possible within the protective scope of the invention as defined in the appending claims.
For instance, instead of delaying the transition from OFF phase to ON phase in the measuring mode, i.e. to delay the ON phase, it is possible to briefly switch OFF the non-measured light sources after having been switched ON, i.e. to briefly interrupt the ON phase, one or more times.
Further, instead of delaying the transition from ON phase to OFF phase in the compensating mode, i.e. to extend the ON phase, it is possible to briefly switch ON the light source concerned after having been switched OFF, i.e. to briefly interrupt the OFF phase, one or more times.
Further, it is not essential that the compensation mode takes place in the cycle following the cycle of the measuring mode. It is possible that the compensation mode cycle precedes the measuring mode cycle, and it is even possible that the compensation mode takes place in the same cycle as the measuring mode. This does not make a difference for the time average; however, the embodiment as described is easier to implement. It is even not essential that the compensation mode takes place in the cycle immediately adjacent to (following or preceding) measuring mode cycle: it can be acceptable if one or more cycles are separating the measuring mode cycle and the compensation mode cycle, but this depends on the duration of the cycles and the temporal sensitivity of the human eye. Assume that the temporal sensitivity of the human eye is about 10 ms; assume further that the current cycles have a duration of 1 ms: in such case, it would be acceptable to have the measuring mode cycle and the compensation mode cycle separated by as much as eight cycles, because the average over 10 ms would still give the correct color impression. Nevertheless, compensation in the next cycle, as described, is preferred.
Other variations to the disclosed embodiments can be understood and effected by those skilled in the art in practicing the claimed invention, from a study of the drawings, the disclosure, and the appended claims. In the claims, the word “comprising” does not exclude other elements or steps, and the indefinite article “a” or “an” does not exclude a plurality. A single processor or other unit may fulfill the functions of several items recited in the claims. The mere fact that certain measures are recited in mutually different dependent claims does not indicate that a combination of these measures cannot be used to advantage. A computer program may be stored/distributed on a suitable medium, such as an optical storage medium or a solid-state medium supplied together with or as part of other hardware, but may also be distributed in other forms, such as via the Internet or other wired or wireless telecommunication systems. Any reference signs in the claims should not be construed as limiting the scope.
In the above, the present invention has been explained with reference to block diagrams, which illustrate functional blocks of the device according to the present invention. It is to be understood that one or more of these functional blocks may be implemented in hardware, where the function of such functional block is performed by individual hardware components, but it is also possible that one or more of these functional blocks are implemented in software, so that the function of such functional block is performed by one or more program lines of a computer program or a programmable device such as a microprocessor, microcontroller, digital signal processor, etc.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
08163657 | Sep 2008 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB2009/053771 | 8/28/2009 | WO | 00 | 2/25/2011 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/026518 | 3/11/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6127783 | Pashley et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6445139 | Marshall et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6630801 | Schuurmans | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6894442 | Lim et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
7781990 | Huang et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
20020171373 | Muthu | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20050117190 | Iwauchi et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20070171670 | Zagar et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20080065345 | Ooghe | Mar 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2006054230 | May 2006 | WO |
2007069149 | Jun 2007 | WO |
2007121574 | Nov 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110148315 A1 | Jun 2011 | US |