This invention concerns a method and a device for use in connection with the fabrication of composite materials and bonded sheet items using the so-called “bagging technique” to increase the bonding pressure on specific parts of the fabricated products during fabrication.
The bagging technique is currently used very extensively to press the various layers of composite materials and bonded sheet components together during bonding and while the adhesive is curing. The basis of the technique is that the layers involved in the desired product are, once they have been coated with adhesive and brought together in the desired manner, sealed inside a plastic bag, from which the air is then extracted, thereby creating a pressure difference in the bag relative to the ambient air and thus pressing the layers together in an uniform manner and compacting the material. The pressure difference can then be increased by using an autoclave. In purely general terms, the bagging technique works very well for a very large number of different applications. It is used mainly in the fabrication of different types of laminates of metal, polymeric binders and fiber reinforcements, and in the fabrication of bonded multilayer sheet products. Problems arise with the technique mainly in connection with the fabrication of items whose adhesive bonds require higher pressures than those normally generated using the bagging technique, and which cannot be achieved even if an autoclaved is used. Problems may also arise in cases where the required autoclave is unavailable. In addition, it has been found difficult to use the bagging technique to produce interior corners with a sufficient degree of dimensional precision in cases where the interiors of the corners must, for reasons relating to molding and forming practice, face toward the bag.
Different variants of the bagging technique have been described in such a large number of different patents, books and articles that we can cite only a few to provide an idea of the state of the art.
The fabrication, using the bagging technique, of flat composite materials containing thermoplastic binders heated to their melting point while the starting material is kept under pressure in a vacuum bag is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,915,896.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,242,523 describes the use of a partially modified bagging technique to fabricate complete panels by bonding finally-formed but not finally-cured stringers and support beams onto similarly finally-formed but not finally-cured cover sheets. The method described there is based on the use of an intermediate layer in the form of heat-resistant flexible rubber mats that are arranged to distribute pressure between the vacuum bag and the various panel components, which are disposed against one another in the desired manner.
Yet another way of using rubber material to distribute pressure between a vacuum bag and a plurality of different composite components that are to be bonded together and have external conformations that make it difficult to achieve the desired pressure distribution over all the critical surfaces using only one vacuum bag of standard design is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,755,341. According to the method described there, the relevant composite components are covered with a free-flowing quantity of particulate silicon rubber that is in turn covered with a conventional vacuum bag that will thus load the silicon rubber particles, which will in turn transfer the pressure load to all the secondary surfaces of the composite components.
As was noted in the preamble, it is difficult to use the bagging technique to produce interior corners with high dimensional precision in those cases where the interiors of the corners must, for reasons related to manufacturing practice, face toward the bag. One way to solve this problem is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,015,168. The method described there is based on arranging special calibration parts that define the inner dimensions of the corners in question on the outside of the vacuum bag, so that the relevant dimensions can be set precisely, using the bag as an intermediate layer. One major disadvantage of this method is that the special calibration parts must be capable of being placed in extremely well-defined final positions, which in turn entails a need for special fastening devices for the calibration parts, thus ultimately making for quite a complex arrangement.
The present invention now offers, in connection with the bagging method, both a general means of increasing the pressure on the components placed in the bag during curing and a means, proceeding from the same basic concept, of producing interior corners with a high degree of dimensional precision. The invention can be used either together with an autoclave treatment, whereupon it is possible to increase the pressure markedly, or to replace a current conventional autoclave treatment, since the autoclave treatment is often a bottleneck in the fabrication process, and the possibility of being able, at least under certain circumstances, to omit a previously necessary autoclave treatment is probably the most important gain offered by the invention.
The basic principle of the invention is now that we will create a larger surface to be loaded by the ambient air pressure than the material surface to be pressure-treated, and that the total pressure on the larger surface will be distributed over the surface to be pressure-treated. What is required to implement the invention is thus a movable tool part with a larger first surface that faces the interior of the bag, a second smaller surface that faces in the opposite direction and is brought into contact with the item which is to be pressure-treated, and a vacuum bag that must cover the entire tool part.
To summarize, the basis of the invention may thus be considered to be that the effect of the atmospheric pressure on a larger surface is distributed over the smaller surface of the product that one intends to fabricate. The increase in pressure to which the product can be subjected by this means during its fabrication will thus be proportional to the differences between these two areas. In order for it to be possible to implement the invention, both the larger and the smaller surface, which appropriately consist of the two confronting sides of a press die, must thus be arranged within the volume delimited by the bag used according to the basic method, and in which the pressure is lowered by pumping out air.
The invention also includes a variant that makes it possible to angle the pressure load laterally by means of a wedge-shaped element that is forced by a pressure surface in the main direction of the actuating pressure so as to simultaneously, as a result of its wedge action, force thereto adapted inner shaping elements laterally away from the direction of movement of the wedge. This latter variant of the invention is particularly well suited for use in the fabrication of high-precision interior corners, in that the movable inner shaping elements can be used to force treated material into tight abutment with its outer flanks against fixed outer shaping elements. The movable inner shaping elements will thus, according to this method, define the interior corners of the finished product, while the fixed outer shaping elements will define all of the outer corners of the product parts.
The invention is described in detail in the claims below, and will now be described in only somewhat greater detail with reference to the accompanying figures.
The figures show the following:
The general device for implementing the invention shown in
If we assume that both parts 1 and 2 of the tool are of length L, then the following mathematical relation can be formulated based on the general designations specified for
If b1=4 b2
and L1=L2
while
P1×b1×L1=P2×b2×L2
then
P1×b1=P2×¼×b1
which yields
P2=4×P1
The following general relations may then be formulated for the device illustrated in
F3=P3×b3×L3
while
F4=P4×b4×L3
whereupon L3 refers to the length of the tool and the fabricated product, and an equation of equilibrium yields
F3−F4=0
P3×b3×I3−P4×b4×L3=0
P4=P3×b3:b4
whereupon, if
b3=3×b4, we obtain
P4=P3×3 b4:b4=3 P3
However, we obtain the following relation if we instead assume that 19 is movable relative to 13 and 14:
A5=b3×L3
F5=P5×A5
F6=P6×A6, which yields
F5=2×F6 cos α
F6=F5:2 cos α, which yields
F6 ∞ when α90°
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
0101655 | May 2001 | SE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE02/00723 | 4/12/2002 | WO | 00 | 11/10/2003 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO02/092330 | 11/21/2002 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4132755 | Johnson | Jan 1979 | A |
4305340 | Iwaki et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4755341 | Reavely et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4915896 | Rachal et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4942013 | Palmer et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
5015168 | Boime et al. | May 1991 | A |
5242523 | Willden et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5242652 | Savigny | Sep 1993 | A |
5451377 | Asher et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
6406580 | Campbell, Jr. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6666942 | Campbell, Jr. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
4234002 | Apr 1994 | DE |
60-206619 | Oct 1985 | JP |
9915323 | Apr 1999 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040169314 A1 | Sep 2004 | US |