Patent Grant
9028589
This application claims priority to Finnish patent application 20096004 filed 1 Oct. 2009 and is the national phase under 35 U.S.C. §371 of PCT/FI2010/050763 filed 1 Oct. 2010.
The invention relates to separating particles from a gas.
Aerosol particles may be formed in combustion processes, e.g. when combusting wood, wood pellets, peat, or municipal waste. Aerosol particles may also be formed in industrial processes such as hot galvanization, welding, or glass smelting. Said aerosol particles are often harmful to the environment or health. In particular, so called nanoparticles may cause health problems when inhaled, because they may penetrate into human lungs. Toxic heavy metals vaporized in industrial processes may also be condensed and enriched in nanoparticles. The term nanoparticle refers herein to particle diameters smaller than or equal to 500 nm.
It is known that aerosol particles may be separated from flue gases by using filtration, or by using electrostatic precipitators. Electrostatic precipitators are typically characterized by a low pressure drop and the ability to handle high particle concentrations.
In conventional electrostatic precipitators, particles are typically charged by means of a corona discharge, and the charged particles are displaced to collection plates by means of an electric field. Typically, charging and electrical displacement are arranged to take place in the same volume. In conventional electrostatic precipitators, the aim is to use a high electric field together with a low charge density, because a strong electric field combined with a high charge density would increase energy consumption. Efficient charging of particles in the 1-100 μm regime requires a strong electric field. Conventional electrostatic precipitators are typically optimized for separating particles whose diameters are in the range of 1 to 100 μm.
On the other hand, efficient charging of nanoparticles requires a high charge density in the particle-laden gas. Thus, conventional electrostatic precipitators are typically not very effective and/or economical when the task is to separate nanoparticles.
A problem with Prior Art solutions for cleaning collection plates of an electrostatic precipitator is that particles loosened during the cleaning process may be captured back to the gas stream. This may be avoided if the gas flow is shut off during the cleaning process. However, this may make the gas cleaning system more complex.
Particles may be charged by a corona discharge such that charging takes place separately from the electrical displacement. However, in that case particles may be deposited on all surfaces in the vicinity of the corona electrode, and this can make cleaning of an electrostatic precipitator more difficult.
An object of the invention is to provide a device for gas cleaning. An object of the invention is also to provide a method for gas cleaning.
According to a first aspect of the invention, there is provided a gas cleaning device (500) comprising:
According to a second aspect of the invention, there is provided a method for separating particles (P0,P1) from particle-laden gas (FG), said method comprising:
According to the invention, particles are first charged, and the charged particles are subsequently separated from a gas flow to a collecting electrode such that the effective collecting area of the electrode is substantially separate from the gas flow. Thus, particles can be removed from the electrode during a clearing procedure of the electrode such that they are not captured back to the gas flow. Consequently, high collection efficiency for nanoparticles may be attained.
In an embodiment, particle-free ionized gas is generated by an ion source, and the particles are charged by mixing the ionized gas with particle-laden gas in a mixing region. Consequently, the ion source is not contaminated, and there is no need to clean it. Thanks to mixing ionized gas with particle-laden gas, the residence time may be long, and the efficiency of charging the nanoparticles may be increased.
When charging of the particles and collecting of the particles are performed separately, this may provide considerable freedom to select operating parameters of the gas cleaning device. For example, a high electric field may be used for displacing charged particles from the gas flow, without excessively increasing electric power consumption of the gas cleaning device. (When the same electric field is used for charging and collecting, a higher electric field may lead to an increased corona current, and subsequently also to excessively high power consumption).
The temperature and gas composition inside the ion source may substantially deviate from the temperature and gas composition of the particle laden (flue) gas. This may allow optimization e.g. in terms of lifetimes of electrodes, materials or electrodes, and/or power consumption.
Because charging of the particles and collecting of the particles are performed separately, the mixing region does not need to comprise electrode pairs which would deflect the ions away from the mixing region. Consequently, the surfaces in the mixing region may remain substantially clean. Thus, the gas cleaning device may be substantially maintenance-free. In fact, the collecting electrode may be the only component which is expected to require regular maintenance.
Furthermore, the ions may have an extended lifetime in the mixing region, because the electric field in the mixing region is very small. Therefore, it is easier to implement a high charge density than in a conventional electrostatic precipitator. Thus, the gas cleaning device may be operated effectively with low power consumption.
Because charging of the particles and collecting of the particles are performed separately, particles deposited on the collecting electrode do not disturb the operation of the ion source.
Because charging of the particles and collecting of the particles are performed separately, an electric current density on surface of the collecting electrode may be low. Consequently, electrically insulating particles deposited on the collecting electrode do not significantly reduce the strength of the particle-deflecting electric field.
Because charging of the particles and collecting of the particles are performed separately, the spatial distribution of a particle-deflecting electric field can be selected so that charged particles impinge substantially only on the collecting electrode. This reduces the need to clean other surfaces inside the gas cleaning device, i.e. surfaces which are not on the collecting electrode.
The embodiments of the invention and their benefits will become more apparent to a person skilled in the art through the description and examples given herein below, and also through the appended claims.
In the following examples, the embodiments of the invention will be described in more detail with reference to the appended drawings in which
a shows a gas cleaning device comprising an ion supply, a particle charging zone, a flow guiding structure, and a particle collecting electrode,
b shows dimensions of the gas cleaning device of
a shows guiding a gas flow such that it does not impinge on the effective particle-collecting area of the collecting electrode,
b shows a first point in the center of the gas flow and a second point at the top of a flow-defining aperture,
a shows, by way of example, gas velocity distributions above the collecting electrode and in the inlet duct of a gas cleaning device,
b shows, by way of example, a gas velocity distribution above the collecting electrode,
c shows, by way of example, gas velocity distribution above the collecting electrode in case of a recirculation vortex,
a shows a recirculation vortex caused by a gas flow impinging on a substantially vertical surface in the electrode chamber,
b shows an inclined surface arranged to minimize the recirculation vortex,
a shows an ion source based on corona discharge,
b shows an ion source based on corona discharge,
a shows, in a three dimensional view, a gas jet formed by a duct, which has an opening on the side, and
b shows, in a three dimensional view, a duct, which has a substantially rectangular cross section.
Referring to
Particle laden gas FG may be introduced to the gas cleaning device 500 via an inlet duct 301.
The charging unit 150 is arranged to form charged particles P1 by charging neutral particles P0 of a particle-laden gas stream FG. The particle laden gas FG may be e.g. flue gas from a combustion process.
The particles P0 may be e.g. solid or liquid particles. The diameter of the particles P0 may be e.g. in the range of 5 nm to 500 nm.
The charging unit 150 may comprise an ion source 100 and the inlet duct 301. The ion source 100 is arranged to provide a flow of ionized gas IG. The ionized gas IG comprises ions J1, which are shown as black dots in
The ionized gas IG may be introduced to the inlet duct 301 via a nozzle 130. Substantially particle-free gas AG may be guided to the ion supply 100 via a tube 140.
The ionized gas may be mixed with the particle-laden gas FG so as to provide a mixture of the ions J1 and particle-laden gas FG.
As the unipolar ions J1 of the ionized gas IG repel each other, the ions J1 may be mixed with the particle laden gas FG by electrostatic forces.
The particle-laden FG gas and the ionized gas IG may also be mixed e.g. by turbulence caused by a stream of ionized gas IG flowing through the nozzle 130. In other words, the nozzle 130 may be arranged to enhance mixing by turbulence.
Charge may be transferred from the ions J1 to neutral particle P0 of the particle-laden gas FG in a particle charging zone CHRZ. A portion of the inner volume of the inlet duct 301 may be used as a charging region CHRZ.
A significant fraction of neutral particles P0 may be converted into charged particles P1 in the charging zone CHRZ. Gas carrying the charged particles P1 may be ejected as a gas jet JET1 into a space between a particle collecting electrode 10 and a counter-electrode 20.
A voltage applied between a particle collecting electrode 10 and a counter-electrode 20 may create an electric field E1, which deflects the charged particles P1 to the collecting electrode 10. The polarity of the collecting electrode 10 is selected such that it attracts the charged particles P1. In other words, the electric field E1 deflects charged particles P1 away from the gas jet JET1 and moves the deflected charged particles P1 to the surface of the collecting electrode 10.
The ion source 100 may be arranged to operate such that the generated ions J1 are unipolar. For example, the ion source 100 may be arranged to operate such that more than 90% of the generated ions are positive and less than 10% of the generated ions are negative. Alternatively, the ion source 100 may be arranged to operate such that more than 90% of the generated ions are negative and less than 10% of the generated ions are positive. Consequently, the majority of particles P1 charged in the charging zone CHRZ are either positive or negative.
The voltage may be generated by a high voltage source 225. The voltage may be coupled to the collecting electrode 10 via a conductor 222 passing through an insulator 221. The collecting electrode 10 may also be mechanically supported by the conductor 222 and/or by insulator 221.
In order to maximize collection efficiency, the voltage source 225 may be arranged to operate such that the voltage coupled between the electrodes 10, 20 is slightly lower than electrical breakdown limit. The electric field E1 created by the collecting electrode E1 may be (e.g. 5%-30%) smaller than the smallest electric field, which causes electric breakdown in the surrounding gas. The electrical breakdown limit may be e.g. 7 kV/cm.
The flow guiding structure 30 may be arranged to direct the gas jet JET1 such that said gas jet JET1 does not blow away particles DEP1 deposited on the collecting electrode 10.
The flow guiding structure 30 may be arranged to direct the gas jet JET1 such that said gas jet JET1 does significantly capture deposited particles DEP1, which are subsequently released from collecting electrode 10 as agglomerates.
The collecting electrode 10 may be located in an electrode chamber 302. Cleaned gas CG may be guided away via an outlet duct 303. The electrode chamber 302 is preferably gas-tight, and it is in fluid connection with the inlet duct 301 and the outlet duct 303.
Particles DEP1 deposited on the electrode 10 may occasionally fall from the electrode 10 to the bottom of the electrode chamber 302 due to gravity. The particle deposit DEP2 on the bottom may be manually or automatically removed from the chamber 302 e.g. via a lid 80. The chamber 302 may further comprise a funnel 70 for collecting the deposit DEP2 into a smaller bottom area.
SX, SY, and SZ denote orthogonal directions (see also
b shows dimensions of the gas cleaning device 500 according to
The flow guiding feature 30 may be e.g. a portion of the gas inlet duct 301.
L1 denotes the length of the charging zone CHRZ, i.e. the distance between the ion injection nozzle 130 and the end of the gas guiding feature 30.
The length L1 of the charging zone CHRZ may be e.g. greater than or equal to 50 cm. The length L4 may be the distance between the collecting electrode 10 and the gas guiding feature 30. The (longitudinal) distance L1+L4 between the nozzle 130 and the collecting electrode 10 may be e.g. greater than or equal to 50 cm. The (longitudinal) distance L1+L4 between the nozzle 130 and the effective particle-collecting area EFFZ of the electrode 10 may be greater than or equal to 50 cm.
Particles smaller than 1.0 μm are charged primarily by a process known as diffusion charging. Charging efficiency depends in that case on the concentration of ions J1, on the residence time in the charging zone CHRZ, and on the temperature of the gas.
The residence time in the charging zone CHRZ may be increased by increasing the length L1. The increased residence time increases the probability for charge transfer from an ion J1 to a neutral particle P0. However, the length L1 should not be too long, because in that case the charged particles P1 may be neutralized on the walls of the inlet duct 301 to a significant degree. The residence time in the charging zone CHRZ may be e.g. in the range of 0.05 s to 1 s, and preferably in the range of 0.1 to 0.2 s. If the residence time is too short, charge is not transferred effectively from the ions J1 to the particles P0. If the residence time is too long, a signification fraction of the charged particles P1 may impinge on the walls of the duct 301, thereby being neutralized.
The initial cross section of the gas jet JET1 is defined by a flow aperture APE1, which is located at the end of the gas guiding feature 30. Thus, the gas guiding feature 30 at least partially defines the flow aperture APE1.
The dimension d1 denotes the inner height dimension of the flow defining aperture APE1. The dimension d1 is determined in a direction, which is parallel to the average direction (i.e. main direction) of the electric field E1 prevailing in the gas jet JET1. In
The dimension d1 may be equal to the inner dimension of the gas duct 301 at the location of the end of the gas guiding feature 30. In case of a substantially circular duct, the dimension d1 may be equal to the diameter of the inlet duct 301.
To the first approximation, the height dimension d1′ of the gas jet JET1 may be considered to be substantially equal to the dimension d1 of the aperture APE1 (See
The distance d2 denotes the vertical distance between the collecting surface of the electrode 10 and the end of the gas guiding feature 30. The length L2 denotes the maximum distance between the gas guiding feature 30 and the effective collecting area of the electrode 10. The length L3 denotes the length of the effective collecting area of the electrode 10.
d3 denotes a distance between the collecting electrode 10 and the counter-electrode 20. To the first approximation, the electric field E1 between the electrodes 10, 20 is inversely proportional the distance d3. L4 denotes the minimum distance between the collecting electrode 10 and surrounding conductive structures. Typically, L4 sets the limit to the maximum electric field E1, which can be applied between the electrodes 10, 20.
The electrode 10 may also be e.g. a substantially planar plate (See
In order to avoid corona discharges in the electrode chamber 302, the electrode 10 may be constructed such that it does not have sharp edges.
The gas cleaning device 500 may comprise one or more adjacent collecting electrodes 10.
A portion of a gas flow duct 304 positioned in the electrode chamber 302 may have a cut-out (opening) 306 so as to allow transverse drifting of charged particles out of the gas flow duct 304. The gas flow duct 304 may form a substantially continuous tube together with the inlet duct 301 and the outlet duct 303 (See also
If the gas flow duct 304 or the top of the electrode chamber 302 is electrically conductive, it may be used as the counter-electrode 20. In particular, the gas flow duct 304 and/or the top of the electrode chamber 302 may be made of metal.
The counter-electrode 20 may also be electrically insulated from the electrode chamber 302, in order to increase the strength of the electric field E1 (this embodiment is not shown). However, in that case a further electric field is created between the other conductive parts of the electrode chamber 302 and the counter electrode 20. The counter-electrode 20 should be dimensioned such that the further electric field does not inadvertently deflect charged particles P1 to those conductive surfaces within the electrode chamber 302, which are exposed to high gas velocities.
In principle, also the ground (i.e. earth or water pipeline system of a house) may be used as the counter-electrode 20, if the electrode chamber 302 is made of electrically insulating material. However, in that case the electric field E1 may be rather weak.
Referring to
Collected particles DEP1 may be removed from the collecting electrode by mechanical vibration, e.g. by rapping or hammering. Thanks to the invention, only a minimum amount of particles are released back to the gas jet JET1.
The particles may also be removed e.g. by washing with a liquid, in particular with water.
Referring to
The gas jet JET1 may diverge in the electrode chamber 302. The gas jet JET1 has a boundary BND1. The boundary BND1 refers to a limit where the gas velocity has decreased to a value, which is 10% of the maximum gas velocity at the center of jet JET1.
Charged particles P1 may be deflected away from the gas jet JET1 to the collecting electrode 10 by the electric field E1 (
This, in turn means that the deposited particles may be rather easily blown away from the electrode 10 by a high velocity gas. Entrainment of neutralized particles back into the gas jet JET1 may drastically reduce the collection efficiency.
The effective particle-collecting area EFFZ of the electrode 10 is preferably positioned outside the gas jet JET1.
In particular, the device 500 for separating particles P0 from the gas FG may comprise:
The effective particle-collecting area EFFZ of the electrode 10 is preferably positioned outside the boundary BND1 of the gas jet JET1, wherein the position of said boundary BND1 is determined without the presence of the electrode 10. In particular, the effective particle-collecting area EFFZ of the electrode 10 may be positioned below the boundary BND1 of the gas jet JET1, wherein the position of said boundary BND1 is determined without the presence of the electrode 10. The position of the boundary BND1 is determined without the presence of the electrode 10, because according to fluid dynamics, gas velocity is equal to zero at the surface of a solid object.
α1 denotes an angle between the boundary BND1 of the gas jet JET1 and the main direction of the gas flow immediately before the location of the aperture APE1. In case of a large electrode chamber 302, the angle α1 may be e.g. in the range of 10° to 15°.
Thus, the maximum distance L2 between the flow guiding structure 30 and the boundary of the effective collecting area EFFZ may be estimated by the equation:
wherein α1 is equal to e.g. 15 degrees.
The flow-defining aperture APE1 may be defined e.g. by an end of the inlet duct 301. If the electrode chamber 302 has a gas flow duct 304 with an opening 306 (See
According to fluid dynamics, the gas velocity on the inner surface of the inlet duct 301 is equal to zero. Thus, in theory, the height dimension d1′ of the gas jet JET1 at the location of the flow-defining aperture APE1 may be slightly smaller than the height dimension d1 of the aperture APE1. However, to the first approximation, the height dimension d1′ of the gas jet JET1 may be considered to be substantially equal to the dimension d1 of the aperture APE1.
The aperture APE1 may also be defined by an array of adjacent nozzles arranged to stabilize gas flow (not shown). In that case the dimension d1 refers to the combined height dimension of the nozzles, and the dimension d1′ refers to the combined height dimension of the resulting gas jet JET1. In particular, the nozzles may be honeycomb nozzles.
Referring to
The traveling time τDRIFT of a charged particle P1 from the point CR1 to the collecting electrode 10 can be estimated by the equation:
where νDRIFT denotes the transverse (i.e. vertical) drifting velocity of a particle P1 caused by the electric field E1. The traveling time τDRIFT may also be called as a residence time.
The horizontal distance LH traveled by the particle P1 during the time τDRIFT can be estimated by the equation:
LH=νGτDRIFT (3a)
where vG denotes average (horizontal) gas velocity in the electrode chamber 302 between the electrodes 10, 20.
The average (horizontal) gas velocity in the electrode chamber may be e.g. in the range of 0.2 to 20 m/s, and preferably e.g. in the range of 0.5 m/s to 2 m/s.
The height dimension d1′ of the jet JET1 may be e.g. in the range of 1 to 60 cm, and preferably in the range of 5 cm to 30 cm. The dimension d2 may be e.g. in the range of 30 to 70% of the dimension d1′.
The height dimension d1 of the aperture APE1 may be e.g. in the range of 1 to 60 cm, and preferably in the range of 5 cm to 30 cm. The dimension d2 may be e.g. in the range of 30 to 70% of the dimension d1.
The drifting velocity νDRIFT of 100 nm particle may be e.g. in the range of 5 cm/s to 100 cm/s. The drifting velocity νDRIFT depends on the electric field E1. The drifting velocity νDRIFT is typically in the range of 10 cm/s−30 cm/s.
The electric field E1, and the gas velocity vG may be selected such that the drifting velocity νDRIFT is greater than or equal to e.g. 10% of the gas velocity vG. In particular, the drifting velocity νDRIFT may be greater than or equal to 30% of the gas velocity vG.
Eq. (3a) can also be expressed in the following form by inserting τDRIFT obtained from the equation (2):
The effective collecting area EFFZ should be long enough so as to ensure that charged particles P1 carried in the vicinity of the position CR1 have sufficient time to drift to the effective collecting area EFFZ. In order to collect substantially all charged particles, the effective collecting area EFFZ should be positioned such that:
L2≧LH (4a)
In other words, the position of the furthermost end of the effective collecting area EFFZ may be selected such that
Charged particles P1 carried at the center CNT1 of the jet JET1 may be collected if the position of the furthermost end of the effective collecting area EFFZ is selected according to the following equation
The electric field E1, the gas velocity vG, and the dimensions d1 and d2 may be selected such that the traveling time τDRIFT of a 100 nm particle is e.g. in the range of 0.05 s to 20 s. In particular, the electric field E1, the gas velocity vG, and the dimensions d1 and d2 may be selected such that the traveling time τDRIFT of a 100 nm particle is preferably in the range of 0.5 s to 2 s. This is expected to provide an optimum mechanical size for the gas cleaning device 500.
The electric field E1, a gas velocity vG, and a transverse distance 0.5·d1+d2 from the center CNT1 of the jet JET1 to the collecting electrode 10 may be selected such that a traveling time τDRIFT of a 100 nm particle from the center CNT1 of the gas jet JET1 to the collecting electrode 10 is in the range of 0.5 to 2 s.
The electric field E1, the gas velocity vG, and the dimension d1′ may be selected such that the traveling time τDRIFT of a 100 nm particle is preferably in the range of 0.5 s to 2 s.
The gas velocity vG may be e.g. approximately equal to three times the drifting velocity νDRIFT, and the dimension d1 may be approximately equal to 50% of the dimension d1. With these typical parameters, equation (4c) defines that L2≧3·d1. In other words, the maximum distance L2 between the gas guiding feature 30 and the furthermost end of the effective collecting area (EFFZ) of the electrode 10 may be greater than or equal to three times the height dimension d1 of the aperture APE1.
The length L3 of the effective collecting area EFFZ may be e.g. approximately equal to the distance L2, and the height dimension d1′ of the jet JET1 may be approximately equal to the height dimension d1 of the aperture APE1. Thus, by inserting typical operating parameters in the equation (4c), it may be derived that the length L3 of the effective collecting area EFFZ may be greater than or equal to three times the height dimension d1′ of the jet JET1.
The collecting electrode 10 may comprise a residual area UZ, which is exposed to the gas jet JET1, i.e. particles on the residual area may be blown away rather easily by the gas jet JET1. In other words, the residual area UZ does not effectively remove particles from the gas jet JET1. L5 denotes the length of the residual area UZ.
Referring to
The flow guiding structure 30 is preferably at the same potential as the counter-electrode 20 in order to minimize neutralization of charged particles P1 on the flow guiding structure 30. In other words, the flow guiding structure 30 may be electrically insulated from the collecting electrode 10. In other words, the flow guiding structure 30 may be in a different electric potential than the collecting electrode 10.
a shows, by way of example gas velocity distributions in the inlet duct 310 and in the electrode chamber 302.
The length of arrows drawn from the vertical line LIN1 indicate horizontal gas velocities at different vertical positions in the inlet duct 301.
The length of arrows drawn from the vertical line LIN2 indicate horizontal gas velocities at different vertical positions in the electrode chamber 302.
LIN3 indicates the position of the end of the flow guiding structure 30, i.e. the position of the aperture APE1.
b shows a gas velocity distribution along the direction SY. y denotes vertical position coordinate in the direction SY, and v denotes gas velocity.
It is expected that the maximum gas velocity VMAX of the gas jet JET1 is found at the location of the aperture APE1, on the line LIN3. The maximum gas velocity at the line LIN2 above the collecting electrode 10 may be slightly lower. The maximum gas velocity above the collecting electrode 10 may be e.g. 85% of the maximum velocity VMAX.
y0 denotes the location of the upper surface of the collecting electrode 10. y1 denotes a location above the upper surface of the collecting electrode 10. v1 denotes gas velocity at the height y1. The position y1 may be e.g. 1 cm above the surface of the collecting electrode.
The effective collecting area EFFZ of the collecting electrode 10 may be positioned such that the absolute value of the velocity gradient Δv/Δy in the vicinity of the effective collecting area EFFZ is smaller than a predetermined limit, so that deposited particles are not blown away by the gas flow to a significant degree.
The gas velocity gradient Δv/Δy at each point of the effective collecting area EFFZ may be e.g. smaller than 10% of the maximum gas velocity VMAX in the gas jet JET1 divided by the height dimension d1′ of said jet.
The gas velocity gradient Δv/Δy at each point of the effective collecting area EFFZ may be e.g. smaller than 10% of the maximum gas velocity VMAX in the gas jet JET1 divided by the height dimension d1 of the aperture APE1.
The maximum gas velocity vMAX in the gas jet JET1 may be kept e.g. smaller than or equal to 10 m/s. In order to provide higher particle collection efficiency, the maximum gas velocity vMAX in the gas jet JET1 may be kept smaller than or equal to 1.0 m/s.
The maximum gas velocity vMAX may be e.g. 10 m/s, and the height dimension d1′ of the gas jet JET1 may be e.g. 5 cm. In this case the velocity gradient Δv/Δy may be kept e.g. smaller than or equal to 20 s−1 (=10%·vMAX/d1′).
The maximum gas velocity vMAX may be e.g. 10 m/s, and the height dimension d1 of the aperture APE1 may be e.g. 5 cm. In this case the velocity gradient Δv/Δy may be kept e.g. smaller than or equal to 20 s−1 (=10%·vMAX/d1).
The velocity gradient Δv/Δy may even be e.g. smaller than or equal to 2 s−1 in order to provide higher collection efficiency.
Said low velocity gradient condition may be fulfilled at each point of the effective collecting area EFFZ, i.e. over the whole effective collecting area EFFZ.
Instead of using a predetermined velocity gradient as a criterion for “outside the gas jet JET1”, it may be defined that the gas velocity at a predetermined height is lower than or equal to a predetermined value. For example, the gas velocity at 1 cm above the effective collecting area EFFZ may be e.g. smaller than or equal to 10% of the maximum velocity VMAX and/or the gas velocity at 1 cm above the effective collecting area EFFZ may be e.g. smaller than or equal to 20 cm/s. In this case, the dimensions d1 and d1′ may be e.g. smaller than or equal to 30 cm, and preferably smaller than or equal to 10 cm.
Said low velocity condition may be fulfilled at each point of the effective collecting area EFFZ.
In particular, the gas cleaning device 500 may comprise:
It may be noticed that the terminal settling velocity of a unit density sphere is 25 cm/s, when the particle diameter is 100 μm, when the gas is air, and when the temperature is 20° C. This means that
A smaller limit, e.g. 2 cm/s may provide even better collection efficiency. Thus, the gas velocity at 1 cm above the effective collecting area EFFZ may be e.g. smaller than or equal to 2 cm/s, at each point of the effective collecting area EFFZ.
The gas cleaning device 500 may be connected to a flue gas duct of a combustion facility, or to an exhaust gas duct of an industrial facility. The combination of a combustion facility and the gas cleaning device 500 may be arranged such that the gas velocity at 1 cm above the effective collecting area EFFZ is smaller than or equal to smaller than or equal to 20 cm/s, or even smaller than or equal to 2 cm/s.
Referring to
The upper side of the collecting electrode 10 may be substantially parallel to the inlet duct 301, but it does not need to be. The upper side of the collecting electrode 10 may also be e.g. parallel to the boundary BND1 so that a long collecting area EFFZ can be kept below the boundary BND1. Even the whole upper surface of a very long collecting electrode 10 can be kept below the boundary BND1.
Referring to
The gas jet JET1 may also be substantially vertical. For example, the gas jet JET1 may be substantially parallel to the direction SY (not shown in the figures).
a shows a recirculation vortex VRTX caused by the gas jet JET1 impinging on a substantially vertical back wall 50 of the electrode chamber 302. β1 denotes an angle between the back wall 50 and the direction SX. The inlet duct 301 may be parallel to the direction SX.
Referring to
a shows an ion source 100. The ion source 100 may comprise a corona electrode 110, a counter-electrode 120, a gas input 123, and a gas output 124.
A voltage may be applied between the coronal electrode 110 and the counter electrode 120 so as to create a corona discharge. The voltage may be provided by a voltage supply 125. The voltage may be e.g. in the range of 0.1 kV to 20 kV. The voltage may be coupled to the corona electrode via a conductor 121. The corona electrode 110 may be rod. The corona electrode may also have a sharp point, i.e. the corona electrode 110 may be a needle. The counter-electrode 120 may be e.g. tubular.
The counter-electrode 120 may be e.g. a portion of a metallic tube, which is supported by a second supporting structure 128. An insulator 122 may support the corona electrode 110 and keep its separate from the counter-electrode. The electrodes 110,120 may be axially symmetric. The electrodes 110, 120 may be arranged substantially co-axially.
Substantially particle-free gas AG may be guided to the input 123 e.g. via a tube 140. At least a portion of the particle-free gas AG may be guided to a discharge region in the vicinity of the corona electrode 110.
The discharge region may be located in the vicinity of the tip of the electrode 110. At least a portion of the molecules (and/or atoms) of the gas are ionized by the corona discharge. Thus, the output 124 of the ion source 100 may provide a stream of ionized gas IG, which comprises ions J1. The polarity of the ions J1 may be selected by selecting the polarity of the corona electrode 110.
The gas AG may be e.g. air, water vapor, carbon dioxide or nitrogen. The gas AG may be substantially particle-free, which means that the particle concentration is so low that deposited particles do not cause significant contamination of the inner parts of the ion source 100. The gas AG may be provided e.g. by a pump (not shown). The flow rate of the gas AG may be regulated by a regulating unit (not shown).
To some extent, ion production rate may be increased by increasing the corona voltage, but this also increases the electric current between the electrodes 110,120. This may significantly increase power consumption of the ion source 100.
It has been noticed that the ion production rate may also be increased by increasing gas velocity in the discharge region. The ion source 100 may comprise a first flow guiding element 126 arranged to increase gas velocity in the vicinity of the corona electrode 110, in order to increase the rate of ion production. In particular, the first flow guiding element 126 may be a constriction.
The ion source 100 may comprise a second flow guiding element 127 arranged to prevent access of external particle-laden gas to the space between the electrodes 110, 120. In other words, the second flow guiding element 127 may be arranged to prevent contamination of the electrodes 110, 120. In particular, the second flow guiding element 127 may be a constriction.
The second flow guiding element 127 may also act as the nozzle 130, i.e. the second flow guiding element 127 may be arranged to inject ionized gas IG to particle-laden gas.
Referring to
A portion of the second support 122 may act as a nozzle 130 for injecting ionized gas IG to particle-laden gas FG. Also in this case, the ion source 100 may comprise a first flow guiding element (not shown) for increasing gas velocity in the vicinity of the corona electrode 110 and/or a second flow guiding element (not shown) arranged to prevent circulation of particle-laden gas to the electrodes 110, 120.
Referring to
If the inlet duct 301 is bent, the ionized gas IG may also be introduced into the inlet duct 301 along a substantially linear path.
Referring to
In this case, only the lower part of the gas jet JET1 is substantially free. The upper part of the jet JET1 is confined to the duct 304.
Referring to
The operating parameters and the dimensions of the gas cleaning device 500 may be selected such that the efficiency for separating e.g. 100 nm particles is maximized. In this context, separation efficiency means the number of separated particles of a predetermined size to the total number of particles of said predetermined size.
The gas cleaning device 500 may be arranged to separate e.g. 40-90% of nanoparticles from the gas FG. Thus, the concentration of nanoparticles in the cleaned gas CG may be e.g. 10%-60% of the concentration of nanoparticles in the particle-laden gas FG, respectively. Thus, emission of harmful particles to the atmosphere may be significantly reduced.
The gas cleaning device 500 may be arranged to remove particles from a flue gas originating e.g. from a combustion process, a combustion engine, a chemical process, a welding process, a glass heating process, or a galvanizing process.
The particles may have been formed e.g. via condensation from the gas phase.
The particle-laden FG gas and the ionized gas IG may be mixed e.g. by turbulence caused by a stream of ionized gas IG flowing through the nozzle 130. In other words, the nozzle 130 may be arranged to enhance mixing by turbulence. When velocity of the ionized gas IG ejected from the ion source 100 is high when compared to the velocity of the particle-laden gas FG, this may naturally create turbulence.
However, turbulence is typically not necessary for charging the particles. A space charge of ions J1 ejected from the ion source (100) may effectively distribute the ions J1 within the particle-laden gas FG. The space charge may distribute the ions J1 substantially over the entire cross-sectional area of the inlet duct 301. In that case, the flow in the inlet duct 301 may be substantially laminar even after the nozzle 130 of the ion source 100. The dimensions of the gas cleaning device 500, the velocity of the ionized gas ejected from the ion source 100, and the velocity of the particle-laden gas FG may be selected such that gas jet JET1 may be substantially laminar. The substantially laminar gas jet JET1 may facilitate providing a high degree of particle separation. In that case, deflected particles are not re-entrained back into the flow due to turbulence.
For the person skilled in the art, it will be clear that modifications and variations of the devices according to the present invention are perceivable. The figures are schematic. The particular embodiments described above with reference to the accompanying drawings are illustrative only and not meant to limit the scope of the invention, which is defined by the appended claims.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20096004 U | Oct 2009 | FI | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/FI2010/050763 | 10/1/2010 | WO | 00 | 3/26/2012 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2011/039422 | 4/7/2011 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4093430 | Schwab et al. | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4110086 | Schwab et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
| 5961693 | Altman et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6096118 | Altman et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6436170 | McDermott et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6824587 | Mohamed | Nov 2004 | B2 |
| 6899748 | Mohamed | May 2005 | B2 |
| 7267708 | Chabek et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
| 20040216607 | Mohamed | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 101089373 | Dec 2007 | CN |
| 1867380 | Dec 2007 | EP |
| 57122952 | Jul 1982 | JP |
| 10043631 | Feb 1998 | JP |
| 2008183540 | Aug 2008 | JP |
| WO-2004094065 | Nov 2004 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Chinese Patent Office—First Office Action—Mar. 28, 2014 (With Translation) (Issued in Chinese Application No. 201080043971.4). |
| PCT/ISA/210—International Search Report—Feb. 4, 2011. |
| Finnish Office Action—May 24, 2010. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20120180659 A1 | Jul 2012 | US |
