All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
It has been shown that high frequency forces, even at low magnitude, are able to stimulate bone formation and increase bone mass. The dental devices described herein are intended to provide the appropriate force to grow and strengthen bone in the mouth,
The present disclosure relates generally to dental devices. More specifically, the present disclosure relates to dental devices used for increasing bone density in the mouth, such as for orthodontic retention.
In general, in one embodiment, a dental device includes a mouthpiece configured to sit against occlusal surfaces of a patient's teeth. The mouthpiece includes a plurality of raised dimples thereon, each raised dimple spaced apart so as to approximately align with the center of some or all of the occlusal surfaces. The dental device further includes a motor connected to the mouthpiece. The motor configured to vibrate the mouthpiece at a frequency between 60 Hz and 130 Hz and an acceleration between 0.035 G and 0.100 G such that the mouthpiece places an axial vibratory force on the occlusal surfaces.
This and other embodiments can include one or more of the following features. Each raised dimple can be sized so as to place pressure on less than 50% of each tooth. The frequency can be between 100 Hz and 120 Hz. The acceleration can be between 0.05 G and 0.06 G. The motor can be configured to oscillate between frequencies and accelerations. The motor can be configured to oscillate between four specific settings. The four specific settings can be 60 hz at 0.035 G, 60 hz at 0.06 G, 120 hz at 0.035 G, and 120 hz at 0.06 G. The mouthpiece can be customized to fit the patient's teeth. The mouthpiece can include a biteplate configured to sit against occlusal surfaces of a patient's teeth and an extension configured to connect to a base. The motor can be a counterweighted motor that is substantially in-line with a longitudinal axis of the extension. The motor can be a pancake motor. The mouthpiece can have a U-shape so as to extend over all of a patient's teeth. The mouthpiece can be configured to extend only over a patient's social six teeth. The mouthpiece can be configured to extend only over a patient's molars. The dental device can further include a sensor configured to detect the vibration proximate to the occlusal surfaces of the patient's teeth. The dental device can further include a controller configured to adjust the motor settings based upon the detected vibration.
In general, in one embodiment, a method of growing bone includes placing a mouthpiece having a plurality of raised dimples thereon over occlusal surfaces of a patient's teeth such that each of the raised dimples approximately align with the center of an occlusal surface, vibrating the mouthpiece at a frequency between 60 Hz and 130 Hz and an acceleration between 0.035 G and 0.10 G such that the mouthpiece places an axial vibratory force on the occlusal surfaces, and repeating the placing and vibrating steps for less than 5 minutes per day for less than 180 days to achieve periodontal ligament growth around the teeth.
This and other embodiments can include one or more of the following features. The frequency can be between 100 Hz and 120 Hz. The acceleration can be between 0.05 G and 0.06 G. Repeating the placing and vibrating steps for less than 5 minutes per day can include repeating the placing and vibrating steps for less than 2 minutes per day. Repeating the placing and vibrating steps for less than 180 days can include repeating the placing and vibrating steps for less than 120 days. The method can further include placing a retainer over the occlusal surfaces of the teeth between repetitions.
In general, in one embodiment, a dental device includes a mouthpiece configured to sit against occlusal surfaces of a patient's teeth and a motor connected to the mouthpiece. The motor is configured to vibrate the mouthpiece at a frequency between 60 Hz and 130 Hz and an acceleration between 0.035 G and 0.100 G such that the mouthpiece places an axial vibratory force on the occlusal surfaces. Further, the dental device weighs less than 50 grams.
This and other embodiments can include one or more of the following features. The motor can requires less than 2 volts to vibrate the mouthpiece. The frequency can be between 100 Hz and 120 Hz. The acceleration can be between 0.05 G and 0.06 G. The motor can be configured to oscillate between frequencies and accelerations. The motor can be configured to oscillate between four specific settings. The four specific settings can be 60 hz at 0.035 G, 60 hz at 0.06 G, 120 hz at 0.035 G, and 120 hz at 0.06 G. The mouthpiece can be customized to fit the patient's teeth. The mouthpiece can include a biteplate configured to sit against occlusal surfaces of a patient's teeth and an extension configured to connect to a base. The motor can be a counterweighted motor that is substantially in-line with a longitudinal axis of the extension. The motor can be a pancake motor. The mouthpiece can have a U-shape so as to extend over all of a patient's teeth. The mouthpiece can be configured to extend only over a patient's social six teeth. The mouthpiece can be configured to extend only over a patient's molars. The dental device can further include a sensor configured to detect the vibration proximate to the occlusal surfaces of the patient's teeth. The dental device can further include a controller configured to adjust the motor settings based upon the detected vibration.
In general, in one embodiment, a dental device includes a mouthpiece configured to sit against occlusal surfaces of a patient's teeth. The dental device further includes a motor connected to the mouthpiece. The motor is configured to vibrate the mouthpiece at a frequency between 60 Hz and 130 Hz and an acceleration between 0.035 G and 0.100 G such that the mouthpiece places an axial vibratory force on the occlusal surfaces. The dental device further includes a sensor configured to detect the vibration proximate to the occlusal surfaces of the patient's teeth.
This and other embodiments can include one or more of the following features. The dental device can further include a controller configured to adjust the motor settings based upon the detected vibration. The sensor can be a piezoelectric sensor. The frequency can be between 100 Hz and 120 Hz. The acceleration can be between 0.05 G and 0.06 G. The motor can be configured to oscillate between frequencies and accelerations. The motor can be configured to oscillate between four specific settings. The four specific settings can be 60 hz at 0.035 G, 60 hz at 0.06 G, 120 hz at 0.035 G, and 120 hz at 0.06 G. The mouthpiece can be customized to fit the patient's teeth. The mouthpiece can include a biteplate configured to sit against occlusal surfaces of a patient's teeth and an extension configured to connect to a base. The motor can be a counterweighted motor that is substantially in-line with a longitudinal axis of the extension. The motor can be a pancake motor. The mouthpiece can have a U-shape so as to extend over all of a patient's teeth. The mouthpiece can be configured to extend only over a patient's social six teeth. The mouthpiece can be configured to extend only over a patient's molars. The dental device can further include a sensor configured to detect the vibration proximate to the occlusal surfaces of the patient's teeth. The dental device can further include a controller configured to adjust the motor settings based upon the detected vibration.
Methods of using these devices to grow bone are also described herein.
The novel features of the invention are set forth with particularity in the claims that follow. A better understanding of the features and advantages of the present invention will be obtained by reference to the following detailed description that sets forth illustrative embodiments, in which the principles of the invention are utilized, and the accompanying drawings of which:
Described herein are dental devices. The dental devices have or include a mouthpiece with a biteplate configured to sit over all or a portion of the occlusal surfaces of a patient's teeth. The dental devices can be configured to vibrate at a frequency between 60 and 120 HZ and an acceleration between 0.03 G and 0.0 6G such that the mouthpieces places an axial vibratory force on the occlusal surfaces of the patient's teeth, thereby enhancing tooth growth.
Referring to
As shown in
In other embodiments, as shown in
It is to be understood that other types of motors can be used in place of motor 106 or motor 2306 to similarly cause the biteplate 114 to smack the teeth. For example, the motor could be a piezoelectric motor, a linear motor, or an electromagnetic motor. Further, it is to be understood that the motors 106 and 2306 can be interchanged for any of the embodiments described herein. The motors used for the devices described herein can advantageously be small and lightweight. For example, the motor can be less than 2 grams, such as less than 1.5 grams, such as less than or equal to 1.2 grams. Further, the motor can be configured to require low current such that the power requirements are low. For example, the voltage required for the motor to run can be less than 5 volts, such as less than 4 volts, less than 3 volts, or less than 2 volts. In some embodiments, the motor requires between 0.5 and 4 volts, such as approximately 1.5 volts. Further, the motor can advantageously consume less than 250 mW of power, such as less than 200 mW of power and/or can have an operating current of less than 100 mA, such as less than 75 mA, such as less than 65 mA. As a result, the overall device (including the mouthpiece and the base) can advantageously be less than 100 grams, such as less than 75 grams, less than 50 grams, less than 40 grams, or less than 35 grams.
The motor 106 and/or motor 2306 can be configured to vibrate the mouthpiece 102 at frequencies between 60 HZ and 130 HZ, such as between 100 HZ and 120 HZ and at accelerations of 0.035 G to 0.100 G, such as 0.050 G to 0.060 G. These frequencies and accelerations can advantageously increase bone growth in the mouth. The motors 106, 2306 can further be configured to oscillate between various vibration settings. For example, the motor 106 can oscillate between four predetermined frequencies. In one embodiment, the motor 106 oscillates between 60 hz at 0.035 G, 60 hz at 0.060 G, 120 hz at 0.035 G, and 120 hz at 0.060 G. Advantageously, by oscillating between frequency and acceleration settings, a patient's teeth will be less likely to adapt to a particular vibration setting and will continue to strengthen and grow over time.
In some embodiments, as shown in
Referring to
In one embodiment, shown in
Although the motor has been described as inside of and inline with the extension 410 of the mouthpiece 102, other configurations are possible. For example, referring to
Likewise, referring to
In some embodiments, the motors described herein can include an insulator theraround, such as a ceramic sleeve.
Referring to
For example, referring to
As another example, referring to
As another example, referring to
As another example, in one embodiment, shown in
Referring to
Referring to
In some embodiments, the mouthguard 834 can be custom fit to the patient's mouth. By having a custom fit mouthguard 834, the mouthpiece 802 can be more efficient and effective in applying the vibratory smacking force on a patient's teeth. As shown in
Referring to
The oven 940 can have a variety of configurations. In some embodiments, the oven 940 is relatively small such that it can easily sit on a counter or table at the office. In some embodiments, the oven 940 can include a drawer 932 with a handle, and the drawer 932 can be configured to hold the mouthguard preform 933. In another embodiment, the oven 940 can include a shelf 992 and a hinged door 994. The oven 940 can further include a power switch, an indicator light, a timer, and/or a display to enhance ease of use.
In some embodiments, shown in
As shown in
Any of the mouthpieces described herein can be connected to a base, such as base 104 or an alternative base. For example, referring to
As another example, referring to
Referring to
As shown in
In one embodiment, as shown in
Further, as shown in
As shown in
Once formed and assembled, the dental devices described herein can be used to strengthen the bone around teeth and tighten the ligaments around teeth such as for retention, e.g. orthodontic retention after braces are removed. For example, the device can be placed in the mouth for less than 10 minutes per day, such as less than 6 minutes, such as approximately 5 minutes, less than 5 minutes, or less than 1 minute per day for less than or equal to 180 days, less than or equal to 120 days, or less than or equal to 90 days to tighten the periodontal ligament after orthodontics. Such use can be in addition to or in place of traditional retainers. Use of the device can advantageously significantly decrease the time required for tightening of the periodontal ligament (from the average of six months to a year). Further, in some embodiments, the dental device can also be used for less than 2 minutes per day, such as less than 1 minute per day, on a continuing basis to provide general tooth strengthening. Further, the dental devices described herein can also be used for strengthening bone during dental implant procedures, tightening ligaments, strengthening bone after periodontics cleaning and procedures, such as after bone grafting.
Variations on the devices described herein are possible. For example, in some embodiments, the devices can have a microchip or Bluetooth connected thereto to record when and how long the device was used for. Further, it is to be understood that the various elements of the mouthpieces and bases described herein with reference to specific embodiments could be substitute and/or combined with other embodiments described herein.
Additional details pertinent to the present invention, including materials and manufacturing techniques, may be employed as within the level of those with skill in the relevant art. The same may hold true with respect to method-based aspects of the invention in terms of additional acts commonly or logically employed. Also, it is contemplated that any optional feature of the inventive variations described may be set forth and claimed independently, or in combination with any one or more of the features described herein. Likewise, reference to a singular item, includes the possibility that there are a plurality of the same items present. More specifically, as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a,” “and,” “said,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. It is further noted that the claims may be drafted to exclude any optional element. As such, this statement is intended to serve as antecedent basis for use of such exclusive terminology as “solely,” “only” and the like in connection with the recitation of claim elements, or use of a “negative” limitation. Unless defined otherwise herein, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which this invention belongs. The breadth of the present invention is not to be limited by the subject specification, but rather only by the plain meaning of the claim terms employed.
This application claims priority to U.S. Patent Provisional Application No. 61/624,100, titled “METHOD AND DEVICE FOR INCREASING BONE DENSITY IN THE MOUTH,” and filed Apr. 13, 2012, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1826434 | Reiss | Oct 1931 | A |
2152391 | Spahn | Mar 1939 | A |
3890953 | Kraus et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
4011616 | Kennedy | Mar 1977 | A |
4123844 | Kurz | Nov 1978 | A |
4219619 | Zarow | Aug 1980 | A |
4266532 | Ryaby et al. | May 1981 | A |
4315503 | Ryaby et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
4348178 | Kurz | Sep 1982 | A |
4505672 | Kurz | Mar 1985 | A |
4530360 | Duarte | Jul 1985 | A |
5030098 | Branford | Jul 1991 | A |
5083552 | Lipowitz | Jan 1992 | A |
5188531 | Von Sutfin | Feb 1993 | A |
5191880 | McLeod et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5273028 | McLeod et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5374237 | McCarty, Jr. | Dec 1994 | A |
5496256 | Bock | Mar 1996 | A |
5536168 | Bourke | Jul 1996 | A |
D374932 | Engelman | Oct 1996 | S |
5639238 | Fishburne, Jr. | Jun 1997 | A |
5692523 | Croll et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5836033 | Berge | Nov 1998 | A |
5967784 | Powers | Oct 1999 | A |
6022349 | McLeod et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6032677 | Blechman et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6183427 | Ishii | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6234975 | McLeod et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6648639 | Mao | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6652473 | Kaufman et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6820623 | Cook | Nov 2004 | B2 |
7004903 | Cadossi et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7029276 | Mao | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7166067 | Talish et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7207955 | Krompasick | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7322948 | Talish et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7448109 | Brewer et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7618450 | Zarowski et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
8133054 | Yamamoto et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8500446 | Lowe et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8986003 | Valoir | Mar 2015 | B2 |
20030196283 | Eliav et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040168271 | McDougall | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050196725 | Fu | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050251068 | Mor | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060281040 | Kelling | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070161931 | Kunita et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070248930 | Brawn | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080227046 | Lowe et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080227047 | Lowe et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080233541 | De Vreese et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090042159 | Yamamoto et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090061375 | Yamamoto et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090061379 | Yamamoto et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090061380 | Yamamoto et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090100620 | Gatzemeyer et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090305184 | Ting et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090326602 | Glukhovsky et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100036286 | Scholz et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100055634 | Spaulding et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100092916 | Teixeira et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100151407 | Rizoiu et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100237720 | Taylor | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110007920 | Abolfathi et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110065060 | Teixeira et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110136070 | Rubin et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110136071 | Levens | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110155146 | Marsh | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110308024 | Hegemann | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120040300 | Levens et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120094246 | Pavlin | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120157895 | Barlow et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120179070 | Pommer et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120322018 | Lowe et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130131558 | Lee | May 2013 | A1 |
20130252193 | Bowman et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140023983 | Lowe et al. | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140080082 | Lowe | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140186789 | Valoir | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140242535 | Lowe et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140272761 | Lowe et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140322661 | Rudman et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150079533 | Lowe | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150164618 | Heacock et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150173856 | Lowe et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150182305 | Lowe et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20160184054 | Lowe | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160361140 | Lowe | Dec 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0337748 | Oct 1989 | EP |
2498715 | Sep 2012 | EP |
2005319254 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2005319254 | Nov 2005 | JP |
201143724 | Dec 2011 | TW |
WO 2005107636 | Nov 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Chen et al.; The effects of frequency of mechanical vibration on experimental fracture healing (Abstract); Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 32(4):217-219; Apr. 1994. |
Darendeliler et al.; Effects of pulsed electromagnetic field vibration on tooth movement induced by magnetic and mechanical forces: a preliminary study; Aust Dent J; 52(4):282-287; Dec. 2007. |
Garman et al.; Low-level accelerations applied in the absence of weight bearing can enhance trabecular bone formation; J Orthop Res; 25(6):732-740; Jun. 2007. |
Griffith, K.; On Teeth's Cutting Edge; downloaded from http://www.orthodonticproductsonline.com/orp-orthodontic-news/13570-on-teeths-cutting-edge-2010-06-04; pp. 8; May 31, 2010. |
Holguin et al.; Brief daily exposure to low-intensity vibration mitigates the degradation of the intervertebral disc in a frequency-specific manner; J Appl Physiol; 111(6);1846-1853; Dec. 1, 2011. |
Nishimura, et al.; Periodontal tissue activation by vibration: intermittent stimulation by resonance vibration accelerates experimental tooth movement in rats; J Orth & Dental Ortho; 133(4):572-583; Apr. 2008. |
Omar et al.; Effect of low magnitude and high frequency mechanical stimuli on defects healing in cranial bones; J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 66(6):1104-1111; Jun. 2008. |
Patri, N.; Low Intensity Vibrations Applied Locally can be Transmitted to the Alveolar Bone Thereby Enhancing the Quality of the Bone in Adults Rats; SUNY—Stony Brook; pp. 83; May 2011. |
Rubin et al.; Anabolism. Low mechanical signals strengthen long bones; Nature; 412:603-604; Aug. 2001. |
Rubin et al.; Inhibition of Ostopenia by Low Magnitude, High-Frequency Mechanical Stimuli; Drug Discov Today; 6(16):848-858; Aug. 2001. |
Rubin et al.; Mechanical strain, induced noninvasively in the high-frequency domain, is anabolic to cancellous bone, but not cortical bone; Bone; 30(3):445-452; Mar. 2002. |
Teixeira et al.; Cytokine expression and accelerated tooth movement; J Dental Res; 89(10)1135-1141; Oct. 2010. |
Tran et al.; Role of inflammation on the rate of bone remodeling and tooth movement (presentation Abstract); presented at COAST: Conferences on Orthodontic Advances in Science and Technology; Sep. 11-14, 2008. |
Ward et al.; Low magnitude mechanical loading is osteogenic in children with disabling conditions; J Bone Miner Res; 19(3):360-369; Mar. 2004. |
Wolf et al.; Effects of high-frequency, low-magnitude mechanical stimulus on bone healing; Clin Orthop Relat Res; 385:192-198; Apr. 2001. |
Way et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 29/453,974 entitled “Dental Device for Bone Remodeling,” filed May 3, 2013. |
Way et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 29/453,982 entitled “Dental Device for Bone Remodeling,” filed May 3, 2013. |
Way et al.; U.S. Appl. No. 29/453,983 entitled “Dental Device for Bone Remodeling,” filed May 3, 2013. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130273490 A1 | Oct 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62624100 | Apr 2012 | US |