The invention relates to nondestructive inspection of solid materials using ultrasonic waves. Especially, the invention relates to a method for determining a residual between a reference signal and a test signal of an inspected solid material, and to a system for providing such a residual. An image of any defect of the inspected material can be calculated from the residual.
Different methods for non-destructive inspection of fluid and solid materials using ultrasound techniques have been developed. Such methods include transmitting an ultrasonic signal into the material and measuring a resulting ultrasonic signal that has travelled through the material at a measuring point, which resulting ultrasonic signal for example has been reflected inside the material before arriving at the measuring point. The analyzing of the resulting ultrasonic signal provides an image of the interior of the material.
Ultrasonic inspection of fluids may start from analysis of pressure. The arrival times of pressure wave echoes give an indication of a distance to a pressure altering structure in the fluid.
The problem of inspecting solids is generally more difficult since solid materials may contain and transfer stress from both compression and shear. Solid materials therefore transfer energy in the form of shear waves as well as compression waves. Ultrasonic inspection of solids is often based on an analysis of a strain field in the material, which strain field may corresponds to compression and shear in the material. The propagation speed of shearing waves is different from the speed of propagation of compression waves, and the measurements and the analysis of the measured signal need to be performed in a more sophisticated manner than for fluids.
One common method uses a short ultrasonic pulse and analysis of the response. One known way of analyzing the resulting measured ultrasonic signal from an inspected part of a construction is to compare the measured signal to a reference signal obtained from a flawless part. Such a reference signal may also be provided from a FEM analysis (Finite Element Method) of the part. The comparison provides a residual signal, which is subsequently analyzed.
Mathematical calculations of how ultrasonic signals from small sources in such a part would produce measurable signals at the measuring position is used to determine an indication of the disturbances in the inspected part that may have produced the residual signal.
Thus, the calculations of a forward, or direct, problem of how small sources produce ultrasonic signals propagating through a material is used as a basis for solving the adjoint, or inverse, problem of what sources, i.e. defects, have produced the residual signal.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,654,142 describes a method for obtaining an image of an inspected part. In this method, a reference part is used, which reference part is a flawless part. A first ultrasonic measurement is performed on the reference part, and a second ultrasonic scan is performed on the inspected part. The measuring probe is positioned in the same relation to the reference part as the inspected part during the measurements, at the same height above a corresponding plane to be inspected. A subtraction is performed between the measurements of the inspected part and the reference part, and the topological energy at each position in the part is determined.
The method of U.S. Pat. No. 7,654,142 determines a “cost function” that correlates data obtained from the reference part and data obtained from measuring the inspected part. In this way an indication of the modifications, or defects, in the inspected part is obtained.
In more detail, the measuring probe includes a number of aligned transducers. The transducers transmit an ultrasonic test signal, one transducer at a time, while the other transducers receives. A matrix of all the received test signals are created, which received test signals are compared to corresponding reference test signals from the reference part. The frequency used for the ultrasonic signals is not indicated, but each measuring results in measurements from a plane of the inspected part.
The method of U.S. Pat. No. 7,654,142 uses the topological energy for providing an image of the inspected part. U.S. Pat. No. 7,654,142 aims at simplifying a previous method described in the article “Flaw imaging with ultrasound: the time domain topological gradient method” by N. Dominguez et al (A1, see the reference list at the end of the description). Both methods are performed in the time-domain, but U.S. Pat. No. 7,654,142 determines the topological energy instead of the gradient for each position of the inspected part. In more detail, the field values of the reference part is subtracted from the measured values of the inspected part, thereafter the subtracted residual signal is subjected to a time reversal by inverting the time scale. This time reversal is described in more detail in the article “Flaw imaging . . . ” and in a further article “Time domain topological gradient and time reversal analogy: an inverse method for ultrasonic target detection” (A2, see the reference list).
A problem for using the methods described in U.S. Pat. No. 7,654,142 and the articles A1 and A2 are to obtain an accurate measurement, i.e. how to avoid disturbances to the ultrasonic test signal when applying the ultrasonic test signal to the inspected part and to avoid disturbances when measuring the resulting signal. The process suggested in article A2 is to use water as a transfer medium to transfer the ultrasonic test signal from the transducer into the inspected part for example, as referred to in the article A2 by immersion of the inspected part in water.
A known alternative to immerse the inspected part in water is to direct a beam of water onto the inspected part and use the water beam as a means for transferring the ultrasonic signal.
A disadvantage of using water is that immersing parts in water baths or directing beams of water onto inspected parts makes the handling of parts for inspection complicated, especially for larger parts and structures.
An alternative to water immersion that may be used is attaching the transmitting and measuring probes permanently to the surface of the inspected part. Such attachment may be done on a flawless part during manufacturing and subsequently used for regular inspections. In this way, the distortion induced from the glue layer will be the same and the measurement signal obtained during an inspection can be compared to an original test signal obtained during manufacturing so that the distortion from the glue layer will not influence the difference between the original reference signal and the subsequent test signal. However, for many parts and constructions it may not be suitable to leave measuring probes attached during use, and also the glue layer may be affected during use of such parts and constructions.
Thus, there is a need for facilitating the measuring process, still providing accurate measurement signals, in order to determine a reliable residual signal.
According to a first aspect of the invention, the invention provides a method for inspecting objects by means of ultrasound, wherein reference signals are used as references for test signals in order to establish residual signals indicating flaws in the objects. The method of inspection comprises:
An advantage is that the method does not require any “a-priori” knowledge of how the wave of the test signal propagates in the structure of the inspected object. The residual is determined from the reference signal and the compensated test signal and will indicate if a defect is present in the inspected object.
A preferred embodiment includes extracting a direct signal portion of the test signal, and determining the contact surface variations based on the direct signal portion of the test signal and a corresponding direct signal portion of the reference signal.
The compensating is performed for the full test signal. The full test signal includes the direct signal portion of the test signal and a reflected signal portion of the test signal.
Preferably, the determining of the residual signal includes performing a subtraction of the full reference signal and the compensated full test signal.
Preferably, the determining of contact surface variations comprises identifying a time window for a direct signal transmission of the combination of sending probe and receiving probe, and using the direct signals of the test signal and the reference signal of said time window. The time window of the direct signal from the sending probe to the receiving probe of each combination is a sub-portion of the total reception time period of the full test signal.
In an embodiment, the determining of the contact surface variations comprises determining a phase shift between the test signal and the reference signal, and the compensating includes compensating the full test signal for the determined phase shift.
This can be seen as a way of aligning the acquired test signal and the corresponding reference signal.
In an embodiment, the step determining of the contact surface variations also comprises determining an amplitude variation between the test signal and the reference signal, and the compensating further includes normalizing the amplitude of the full test signal and/or the reference signal in accordance with the determined amplitude variation.
In an embodiment, the determining of the contact surface variations includes determining a frequency varying filter compensating the full test signal on the basis of the determined filter equivalent.
In an embodiment, the inspecting includes evaluating the level of the residual.
In an embodiment, the evaluating of the residual level includes comparing a measure of the residual, or the residual, to a threshold, and indicating to an operator when the measure of the residual exceeds the threshold.
In an embodiment, the inspecting includes obtaining the reference signal from a reference zone of the inspected object, or from a reference zone of a reference object.
In an alternative embodiment, the reference signal is obtained from simulations, such as FEM simulations (Finite Element Method), in a computer model of the test object.
In an embodiment, the induced ultrasound signal has a frequency of less than 1 MHz, preferably between 50 kHz and 500 kHz, especially between 100 and 250 kHz. Using a frequency lower than 1 MHz provides a spreading of the ultrasonic signal within many materials, and makes it possible to inspect a larger area, or inspection zone, at each position. These frequencies are suitable for inspection using Lamb waves. Especially, the frequency can be selected to provide Lamb waves propagating in an inspected plate-like object. To create the Lamb waves, the frequency is selected based on the elastic properties of the material of the inspected object and on the thickness of the inspected plate-like object. The plate-like object will then act as a guide for the propagation of the Lamb waves. By choosing such a frequency, the inspection is especially suitable for inspecting plate-like structures such as aerospace structures. Thus, in preferred embodiments, the frequency is selected to create Lamb waves in the inspected object. However, these frequencies are also suitable for other waves in solid objects of large dimensions, such as a solid concrete construction having a non-plate shape.
According to a second aspect, the invention also provides a system for inspecting an object by means of ultrasound. The inspection system comprises:
In an embodiment of this aspect, the calibrator is adapted to determine the influence of contact surface variations by determining a phase shift between the test signal and the reference signal, and to compensate the full test signal for the determined phase shift.
In an embodiment of this aspect, the calibrator is further adapted to determine the influence of contact surface variations by determining an amplitude difference between the test signal and the reference signal, and to compensate the test signal by performing an amplitude normalization of the full test signal and the reference signal.
In an embodiment of this aspect, the calibrator is adapted to determine the influence of contact surface variations by determining a frequency varying filter equivalent and to compensate the full test signal on the basis of the determined filter equivalent.
In an embodiment of this aspect, the computing device further comprises:
In an embodiment of this aspect, the ultrasound unit is adapted to provide ultrasound signals at a frequency of less than 1 MHz, preferably between 50 kHz and 500 kHz, especially between 100 and 250 kHz. Especially, the frequency is selected to create Lamb waves in the inspected object. Thus, the ultrasound unit is adapted for frequencies that when induced by the transducer, which acts as sending probe, create Lamb waves in the inspected object.
According to a third aspect, the invention also provides a computer program product for determining a residual from test signals acquired by means of ultrasound from an inspected object and reference signals. The computer program product comprises a computer program that when run on a computer enables the computer to perform the steps of:
In an embodiment of this aspect, the step of determining the contact surface variations comprises determining a frequency varying filter equivalent for the contact surface, and the step of compensating includes compensating the test signal on the basis of the determined filter equivalent
In an embodiment of this aspect, the step of determining the contact surface variations comprises determining a phase shift between the test signal and the reference signal, and determining an amplitude difference between the test signal and the reference signal, and the step of compensating includes compensating the test signal for the determined phase shift, and normalizing the amplitude of the test signal and/or the reference signal in accordance with the determined amplitude variation.
Embodiments of the invention will be described with reference to the drawings wherein;
With reference to
The present invention provides a method of calibration using the direct signals propagating through the calibration zones 2 and 6. This calibration method will be described mathematically in the following.
Referring to
r
4(t)=s(t)*h3(t)*k3*G34(t)*k4*h4(t) eq. 1
which in the frequency domain is equivalent to:
R
4(ω)=S(ω)·H3(ω)·K3·G34(ω)·K4·H4(ω) eq. 2
wherein:
r4 is the time domain signal received and measured by the receiving probe 4;
s is the excitation signal induced by the sending probe 3 in the reference zone 1 of reference object A;
h3 and h4 are the respective transfer function (i.e. the response) of the sending probe 3 and the receiving probe 4;
k3 and k4 are the respective filtering effect of the contact between the sending probe 3 and the reference object A, and between the receiving probe 4 and the reference object A; and
G34 is the Green function that describes the propagation between the sending probe 3 and the receiving probe 4 through the reference zone 1 of reference object A, i.e. through the calibration zone 2;
Referring to
r
8(t)=s(t)*h7(t)*k7*G78(t)*k8*h8(t)+S(t)*h7(t)*k7*G798(t)*k8*h8(t) eq. 3
which in the frequency domain is equivalent to:
R
8(ω)=S(ω)·H7(ω)·K7·G78(ω)·K8·H8(ω)+S(ω)·H7(ω)·K7·G798(ω)·K8·H8(ω) eq. 4
wherein:
r8 is the time domain signal received and measured by the receiving probe 8;
s is the excitation signal induced by the sending probe 7 in the inspected zone 5 of the inspected object B;
h7 and h8 are the respective transfer function (i.e. the response) of the sending probe 7 and the receiving probe 8;
k7 and k8 are the respective filtering effect of the contact between the sending probe 7 and the inspected object B, and between the receiving probe 8 and the inspected object B;
G78 is the Green function that describes the direct propagation between the sending probe 7 and the receiving probe 8 through the calibration zone 6 of the inspected object B;
G798 is the Green function that describes the reflected signal, i.e. the propagation from the sending probe 7 to the defect 9, the interaction of the signal wave with the defect 9 and the propagation from the defect 9 to the receiving probe 8.
To extract the contribution of the defect, i.e. G798 the same pair of probes (3, 4) should be used on the inspected object B as on the reference object A. Also, the excitation signal s(t) used should be the same. Thus, a pair of probes 3, 4 are used for a first measurement in the reference zone 1 on the reference object A and subsequently the same pair of probes 3, 4 are used in the inspected zone 5 on the inspected object B.
The responses h3 and h7 are the same, and the responses h4 and h8 are the same, so that:
h
3(t)*h4(t)=h7(t)*h8(t)=hh(t) eq. 5
Also, the reference object A and the inspected object B are selected so that the propagation zones, i.e. the reference zone 1, the inspected zone 5, and especially the calibration zones 2 and 6 have the same, or at least very similar, material and geometry, so that:
G
34
=G
78
=G eq. 6
The filtering effect from the contacts between the probes and the reference object A and inspected object B, respectively, can be described as:
K
n
=A
n
ejφ
eq. 7
wherein A is a loss factor and φ is a phase shift.
Note, however, that a more general model of filtering effects arising from the contacts between the probes and the objects will be given in eq. 17.
Referring to eq. 7, K7*K8 can be written:
K
7
K
8
=A
7
A
8
e
j(φ
+φ
)
=A
78
e
j(φ
) eq. 8
and K3*K4 can be written:
K
3
K
4
=A
3
A
4
e
j(φ
+φ
)
=A
34
e
j(φ
) eq. 9
When the calibration zones 2 and 6 are much smaller than the inspection zone 5 that includes the defect 9, the time domain signal r8 will not include any contribution from the signal reflected by the defect 9 during an initial time period (or calibration time) Tc. This means that r8 can be described by:
In the same way the time domain signal for the reference object A does not include any contribution from a defect, so that
r
4(t)=A34ej(φ
During the initial time period Tc the received signals r4 and r8 will be similar, and this may be used for determining the contribution G798 (t) of the defect 9 in the received signal after the initial time period Tc. The received signals r4 and r8 will, however, differ in respect of the amplitudes A34, A78 and the phases φ34, φn. The amplitudes A34, A78 and phases φ34, φ78 differ because of the difference in the filtering effects caused when applying the probes in contact with the reference object A and the inspected object B, respectively (see eq. 7).
The received signals r4(0<t<Tc) in the reference zone 1 of the reference object A, and r8(0<t<Tc) in the inspected zone 5 of the inspected object B, respectively (see eq. 10a and eq. 11), during the initial time period Tc can be normalized:
and using a cross-correlation of these received signals r4(0<t<Tc) and r8(0<t<Tc), the phase difference, or phase shift, A between the received signals can be determined:
Δ=φ78−φ34 eq. 13
Thus, the influence of the differences of the filtering effects, i.e. differences in the contact between each probe and the objects, can be determined from the measured signals, i.e. received signals, of the initial time period Tc. This time period Tc may therefore be used for calibration, and referred to as a calibration time window.
Applying the normalization factor A (of eq. 12) and the phase shift (of eq. 13) to the received signal r4 (of eq. 11) in the reference object 1 gives:
As can be seen eq. 14 relates the received signal r4 of the reference object A to the received signal of the inspected object B.
In order to determine a time signal that is only depending on the presence and influence of the defect 9, the left hand and right hand sides of eq. 14 are subtracted from the left hand and right hand sides eq. 10B, which describes the received signal r8 in the inspected object B after the initial time period (t>Tc):
r
8(t)−A ej(Δ)r4(t)=+A78ej(φ
and thus r8(t)−A ej(Δ)*r4(t)=residual(t) eq. 16
It should be noted that the residual is independent from the Green functions G(t). Thus, the presence of a defect or flaw can be detected from the residual without knowledge of how the wave of the signal propagates in the inspected object, i.e. without knowledge of any Green function G(t).
If there are no other reflections than the defect 9 during the total inspection time period, then r4(t) will be null after the initial time period Tc. However, normally there are other reflections as well. Since the influences of the difference of contact between the probes and objects, as described by the amplitude normalization A and the phase shift A, are determined from the received signals r4 and r8 during the initial time period Tc, the influence from the defect 9 can be determined as described by eq. 15 since the other reflections are the same in the reference zone 1 of the reference object A and the inspected zone 5 of the inspected object B. In this way a residual (eq. 16) can be obtained, which will only indicate the defect 9.
As an alternative, or complement, to using the model of the filtering effect described in eq. 7, a more general filtering model is provided. It is suggested that a more general filtering model that also considers frequency dependency of the phase shift and amplitude variations during the initial time period Tc is used. In the frequency domain:
K
n(ω)=An(ω)ejφ
Using the filter model of eq. 17, for the reference zone (see eq. 2) during t<Tc, the reference signal in the frequency domain is:
R
4(ω)=S(ω)·H3(ω)·K3(ω)·G34(ω)·K4(ω)·H4(ω) eq. 18
The received signal R8 in the inspected zone during t<Tc (see eq. 4) with the filter model of eq. 17:
R
8(ω)=S(ω)·H7(ω)·K7(ω)·G78(ω)·K8(ω)·H8(ω) eq. 19
Using eq. 5 (h3(t)*h4(t)=h7(t)*h8(t)) R8 can be rewritten as:
thus:
wherein the contact filter CF(ω) can be defined as:
wherein f denotes filter.
To determine CF(ω), the direct signals of R8(ω) and R4(ω), received during the calibration time t<Tc, are compared. CF(ω) can be determined using a known system identification technique, such as any of:
a) a frequency response estimate;
b) a time domain correlation analysis for estimation of the finite impulse response (FIR); or
c) a transfer function estimate.
Such analysis can for example be made as presented in “System identification, Theory for user, by L. Ljung, Prentice Hall” (A3).
The residual can be determined from (compare eq. 16):
residual(t)=r8(t)−CF(t)*r4(t) eq. 23
The residual is determined for the total inspection time period, i.e. also for t>Tc, by convolution.
Once again, the residual is independent from the Green functions G(t). The presence of a defect can, thus, be determined by only using the test signal r8(t) and the reference signal r4(t).
Thus, the general filter CF(t) is determined in the frequency domain by means of the direct signals r4 and r8 received during the initial time period Tc, and the general filter is subsequently applied to the total reference signal r4 for subtraction from the received signal r8 of the inspected zone, i.e. also for t>Tc, to provide the residual.
A third alternative is to create a computer model of an object to be inspected, such as a CAD-model (“Computer Aided Design”), for providing a virtual reference zone for comparison of subsequent measurements of the real object, i.e. measurements in an inspected zone 5 of the real object.
The reference signal r4(t) will not be null after the calibration time due to the echo from the known feature 10, but the influence of a defect 9 can be determined using eq. 16 or eq. 23.
Using eq. 16, the direct signals received during the calibration time period Tc should be used for amplitude normalization and phase shift determination, e.g. by means of cross correlation, of the received signals r4(t) and r8(t) in the reference zone 1 and the inspected zone 5, respectively, so that the amplitude of the received reference signal r4(t) is normalized and the phase difference is compensated for.
Using eq. 23, the direct signals used during the calibration time period TC should be used for determining the filtering effect of the contact surface, as described in eq. 17, and by means of convolution a calibration is performed for the full signals of r4(t) and r8(t).
The influence of the known feature 10 can be seen as A*ej(Δ)r4(t) (of eq. 15 and eq. 16) in the received signal r8(t) in the inspected zone 5 for t>Tc, i.e. after the calibration time period.
In accordance with eq. 23, the known feature 10 can be seen CF(t)*r4(t) in the received signal r8(t) for t>Tc, i.e. after the calibration time period, in the inspected zone 5.
If the residual shown in
The measuring system 13 is communicatively connected, as indicated by the broken line 21, to a computing device 30. The computing device 30 comprises a computer 31 configured for receiving the measurements and performing an analysis of the measurements. The computing device 30 also comprises a monitor 32 for displaying the results to an operator. The computing device 30 can suitably be configured to obtain reference signals, or alternatively, the computing device 30 should be configured with stored reference signals obtained previously, for example by means of FEM-simulations. The computing device 30 is configured to retrieve the reference signals, so called baseline signals, and configured to compare the obtained test signals with the baseline signals. The computing device 30 may preferably be configured with software for performing reference measurements and inspection measurements. The software should include computer executable instructions for performing a reference measurement, obtaining a reference baseline signal, and storing the baseline signal, as well as instructions for performing inspection measurements, obtaining test signals and comparing the test signals with the stored baseline signals.
When using the measuring system 13, a user position the measuring device 11 at a predetermined position on the test object 20, and the measuring device 11 acquires test signals in that position. The acquired test signals are transferred to the computing device 30 that compares the acquired signals with baseline signals for that position. From this comparison, the computing device is adapted to perform a calibration and determine the residual, such as described by eq. 16 or eq. 23.
The computing device 30 should be configured with, or configured for obtaining, baseline reference signals for each position that should be inspected. As indicated previously, these baseline reference signals can be provided by measuring on a reference object, measuring in a reference zone on the inspected test object or performing calculations from a FEM-model of the test object.
Especially, the computing device 30 is adapted to compensate for variations in the contact area, or zone, between each transducers 12 and the inspected test object 20, i.e. the computing device 30 is adapted to compensate for the effect of different contact interfaces between the reference baseline signal and the test signals of the measurements.
To perform a compensation for different contact interfaces between the measurements of, or calculations of, the reference baseline signal and measurements of the test signals, the computing device 30 may be adapted to compensate for the phase difference, or phase shift A, between the reference baseline signal and the test signal from the inspected object 20 as described by eq. 15 and eq. 16. Also, the computing device 30 may be adapted to perform an amplitude compensation such as the described amplitude normalization. In many inspection situations it has been found that the influence from the variations in amplitude, between reference measurements and inspection measurement, is small compared to the influence of the phase shift A. Therefore, it may not be necessary to perform compensation of the amplitude.
In other cases a more general model of the filtering effect arising from the contact surfaces should be used in accordance with eq. 16. The computing device 30 may be adapted for both types of compensation. The computing device 30 can suitable be adapted to compensate for the phase shift A, check the residual to determine if the compensation is adequate, e.g. check that the residual during the initial time period is approximately null, and apply an amplitude normalization if the compensation is not adequate. The computing device 30 can be adapted to subsequently deduce if the compensation of phase shift and amplitude normalization is adequate, e.g. by checking that the residual during the initial time period is approximately null, and compensate by means of the general filter model of eq. 16 if the compensation is not good enough, e.g. if the residual is not small enough.
When test signals have been acquired for a first position of an inspected zone 5, the measuring device 11 is moved to a second position of the inspected zone 5. The measuring device 11 may be moved continuously or step-wise. The measuring system 13 is configured to use short ultrasonic pulses, and test signals may be obtained at regular intervals during continuous movement of the measuring device 11 in contact with the inspected object 20.
The measuring system 13 is provided with transducers 12 preferably adapted to induce ultrasonic signals at a low ultrasonic frequency, i.e. below 1 MHz. In many solid materials, such as metals like aluminum, such low frequency ultrasonic signals spread while propagating through the solid material. Ultrasonic signal of between 5-10 MHz propagate in a more straight manner, and an advantage of using the low frequency ultrasonic signals of less than 1 MHz is that these signals can spread into and cover a larger portion of the inspected object 20. Moreover, the low frequency ultrasonic signals can be used for inspecting more complicated structures, also at a distance beyond the variations of the structure. The technique, using a reference signal e.g. as obtained from the inspected object or structure, for calibration does not require any “a-priori” knowledge of how the wave propagates in the structure under inspection. That is to say that no knowledge of G(t) in eq 10a, 10b and 11 is needed in order to identify the presence of a defect. This makes possible the inspection of a complicated structure.
The test object 20 inspected in
The other transducers 12 of the array in
The situation of only using test signals from neighboring transducers 12 is further illustrated in
The method for inspecting begins with obtaining 100 a baseline reference signal. The obtaining 100 can preferably be done on a reference zone 1 of a reference object or on a reference zone 1 of the test object. An ultrasonic signal is induced in the reference zone 1 by at least one transducer 12 of the measuring device 11 and received by at least one other transducer 12 of the transducers. Preferably every transducer 12 induces an ultrasonic signal, which ultrasonic signal is received by the transducers 12 that neighbors that sending transducer 12. One reference signal is obtained for each combination of sending transducer 12 and receiving transducer 12 that should be used during the subsequent inspection of the test object. Reference signals are obtained for all positions corresponding to the positions of the subsequent inspection.
An alternative to measuring reference signals is to simulate transmissions in a FEM model of the test object, i.e. simulating transmissions and receptions in the positions of the inspected zone 5.
The inspection of the test object begins by positioning 101 the measuring device with the transducers 12 in contact with the surface of an inspected zone 5 of the inspected object 20.
The inspecting may include measuring at several positions, wherein the inspecting includes moving the measuring device 11 from position to position, in a continuous or step-wise fashion. A residual for each test signal of each position is determined.
After the step of positioning, the inspecting continues with acquiring 103 test signals. Acquiring a test signal includes inducing an ultrasonic signal, such as a short pulse, by means of one of the transducers 12 acting as a sending probe 7 and receiving the ultrasonic signal by means of at least one other transducer 12 acting as a receiving probe 8.
The acquiring 103 includes establishing test signals for every transducer 12 of the measuring device 11 acting as a sending probe 7.
Preferably, each transducer 12 that neighbors the transducer 12 that induces a test signal are used for receiving this test signal. The measurements of the transducers 12 may be controlled by not registering signals from non-neighboring transducers 12.
After acquiring the test signals, the method of inspecting continues with extracting 104 a direct signal portion of each test signal. The extracting 104 preferably includes identifying a time window Tc for the direct signals of each pair of neighboring transducers 12.
The inspecting continues with determining 105 the influence of the contact surface variations between the reference signal and the test signal. The determining 105 is based on the direct signal portions of the reference signal and the corresponding test signal. In the embodiment of
The determining 105 of the influence of the contact surface variations as a phase shift includes comparing the test signal received in the time window Tc with the reference signal of the time window Tc. The comparing may be provided by performing a cross correlation analysis of the test signal and the reference baseline signal, especially the signals of the calibration time window Tc.
After establishing the phase shift, the inspecting continues with compensating 106 for the phase shift. The compensating 106 is made for the full test signal, so that it includes, not only the direct signal portion but also, the reflected signals, i.e. the portion of the test signal received after the time window Tc.
The inspecting may include establishing the time window for the inspection of the inspected zone 5, which time window of the inspection is determined on the basis of the size of the inspected zone 5. The full signals used should end when the time window of the inspection ends.
The inspecting method may continue with normalizing 107 the amplitude of the test signal in relation to the amplitude of the baseline signal. The normalizing 107 of the amplitude is performed by means of the direct signals of the time window Tc. However, for many applications the influence of the phase shift is much greater than the variation of the amplitude, and therefore the inspecting may provide valid measurements performing only compensation 106 of the phase shift for the full signal, even without normalizing 107 the amplitudes.
After compensating 106 for the phase shift the residual is determined 109. If an amplitude normalization 107 has been made, the determining 109 of the residual is performed after the normalization 107.
The determining 109 of the residual includes comparing the full test signal to the full baseline signal. Especially, performing a subtraction of the compensated full test signal and the full baseline signal in accordance with eq. 15 and eq. 16.
The inspecting preferably also includes evaluation 110 of the residual, at least an evaluation of the size of the residual. A size of the residual can be established by determining a measure of the energy of the residual or a measure of the amplitude, such as a mean or maximum amplitude. The size of the residual may be compared to a threshold value. The evaluation preferably includes comparing the residual, or the measure of the residual, to a threshold and presenting the result of the evaluation to the operator, especially indicating to the operator if the residual, or the measure of the residual, exceeds a threshold value. Thus, preferably the computing system 30 performs the evaluation and transmits an indication of a defect to the measuring device 11, which indicates by means of the user interface 14, 15 that a defect has been detected in the inspected zone 5 of the test object 20.
The inspecting method of
The method of inspecting in
After determining 205 the influence of the contact surface variation for each of the direct signals, a compensation 206 of each full test signal is performed based on the respective filter equivalent.
As in the inspecting method of
The computer 31 will be illustrated in more detail with reference to
The functional units include an ultrasonic controller 301, a measuring unit 302, a calibrator 303, a residual calculator 304, an evaluator 305, and an output 306. The ultrasonic controller 301 comprises means for controlling the ultrasonic unit 19 provided to to transmit signals to and receive signals from the measuring system 13. The output 306 comprises means for returning a result, such as an indication of a defect, to the measuring device 11, and for providing information to the operator by means of the monitor 32. The measuring unit 302 is configured for receiving measurements and storing these, and is adapted for receiving and storing both test signals and reference signals to perform the steps of obtaining 100 a reference signal and acquiring 103 test signals.
The calibrator 303 is configured to extract 104 the direct signal portion of the test signal, determine 105, 205 the influence of the variations of the contact surfaces and compensate 106, 107, 206 the full test signal before the residual is determined by the residual calculator 304. The calibrator 303 may be adapted both for comparing the test signal with a measured reference signal as well as comparing the test signal with a pre-stored reference signal. The calibrator 303 may be adapted to
The residual calculator 304 is configured to subtract the calibrated test signal from the reference signal in order to provide a residual for further calculations.
The residual evaluator 305 is adapted to determine a measure of the residual signal such as an energy content and may preferably also be adapted for solving the adjoint problem to provide an illustration of the inspected object 20 on the monitor 32 by means of the output 306.
The functional units 301-306 may be implemented in a computer by means of a computer program 307, illustrated as a computer disc, which computer program 307, when run on the computer 31, enables the computer 31 to perform the functions described above.
A method and a system for inspecting objects by means of ultrasound has been provided, wherein reference signals are used as references for test signals in order to establish residual signals indicating flaws in the objects.
The said method comprises positioning (103) a measuring device (11) comprising a plurality of transducers (12) on the inspected object (20) and performing a number of test signal acquisitions (103). Each acquisition includes using one transducer to induce an ultrasonic signal into the test object, and using at least one other transducer to receive an ultrasonic test signal. The inspecting further comprises determining (105, 205) the influence of contact surface variations between each test signal and the reference signal; compensating (106, 206) the full test signal for the contact surface variations; and determining (109) a residual signal based on the compensated test signal.
The system comprises a computing device (30), and a measuring system (13) communicatively connected to the computing device (30). The measuring system (13) includes an ultrasound unit (19) and a measuring device (11) provided with a plurality of transducers (12). The computing device (30) comprises a calibrator (303) configured to determine (105, 205) the influence of contact surface variations, and compensate (106, 206) the test signal for the contact surface variations. The computing device (30) also comprises a residual calculator (304) configured to determine (109) the residual signal based on the compensated test signal and the reference signal.
A computer program has also been provided for enabling a computing device (30) to perform the method steps of the computing device.
All embodiments have been provided for facilitating enabling the invention and are examples only, the scope of the invention is only limited by the claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1450404-7 | Apr 2014 | SE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE2015/050367 | 3/26/2015 | WO | 00 |