The invention relates to a method and a device for producing a strand of metal by means of a continuous-casting installation which has at least one cooling device for cooling the strand, the cooling device being assigned at least one reduction stand for reducing the thickness of the strand, which during the thickness reduction has a solidified skin and a liquid core.
In the production of strands of metal it is known for a reduction stand to be assigned (downstream) to a continuous-casting installation. A particularly substantial reduction in thickness is achieved if the strand has a core which is still liquid when it enters the reduction stand. In this method, which is known as soft reduction, it is important for the liquid core to be large enough to ensure the required reduction in thickness of the strand while also not being so large that the strand breaks open and the liquid metal escapes. To achieve the required size of the liquid core on reaching the reduction stand, the strand is cooled by means of a cooling device, the cooling required being set by an operator after he has estimated the size of the liquid core. The document “Neubau einer VertikalstranggieBanlage bei der AG der Dillinger Hüttenwerke”[Construction of a new vertical continuous-casting installation at Dillinger Hüttenwerke AG]” Stahl and Eisen 117, No. 11; 10 Nov. 1997, demonstrates the problems of the location and positioning of the blunt tip of a strand in relation to the soft reduction zone, and it is taught that the soft reduction zone should be tracked beyond the respective position of the blunt tip during casting. This is possible through the fact that the segments can be hydraulically positioned in the strand-guiding section.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a method and a device for carrying out the method which allows soft reduction which is an improvement over the prior art, particularly when the strand velocity varies. This object is achieved by producing a strand made from metal by means of a continuous-casting installation which has at least one cooling device for cooling the strand, at least one reduction stand for reducing the thickness of the strand arranged downstream of the cooling device. During the reduction in thickness, the strand has a solidified skin and a liquid core, and the cooling is set, by means of a temperature and solidification model, in particular automatically, in such a manner that the solidification boundary between the solidified skin and the liquid core when the strand enters the reduction stand corresponds to a predetermined set solidification boundary between the solidified skin and the liquid core. In this way, particularly good soft reduction is achieved. Reduction stands used in the context of the present invention, may, in addition to simple rolling stands, be complex rolling stands, which impart a defined geometry to the strand by rolling. The temperature and solidification model, for example, may be an analytical model, a neural network, or a combination of an analytical model and a neural network. The temperature and solidification model relates the cooling of the strand to the solidification boundary between the solidified skin and the liquid core. Such a configuration of the invention is particularly advantageous since the temperature and solidification model simulates the solidification boundary between the solidified skin and the liquid core as a function of the amount of cooling, using the cause-effect relationship between cooling and the solidification boundary between the solidified skin and the liquid core.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the temperature and solidification model is used to determine the solidification boundary between the solidified skin and the liquid core as a function of the cooling of the strand, in particular in real time and continuously. The required cooling of the strand is determined iteratively as a function of the predetermined set solidification boundary between the solidified skin and the liquid core. Iteration is repeated until the deviation in the solidification boundary between the solidified skin and the liquid core (which has been determined using the temperature and solidification model), from the predetermined set solidification boundary between the solidified skin and the liquid core is less than a predetermined tolerance value.
In another preferred embodiment of the present invention, at least one further variable, selected from the group consisting of strand velocity, strand geometry, strand shell thickness, mold length, time, strand material, coolant pressure or volume, droplet size of the coolant, and coolant temperature is used to determine the required cooling of the strand as a function of the predetermined set solidification boundary between the solidified skin and the liquid core.
In a further preferred embodiment of the present invention, the strand geometry, strand shell thickness, time, strand material, coolant pressure or volume and coolant temperature variables are also used to determine the required cooling of the strand as a function of the solidification boundary between the solidified skin and the liquid core. The use of these variables is particularly suitable for achieving a precise cooling of the strand.
In yet another preferred embodiment, each reduction device is assigned a set solidification boundary between the solidified skin and the liquid core of the strand.
In another preferred embodiment of the invention, the action of the reduction in thickness produced by the reduction stand, in particular the position of the solidification boundary between solidified skin and liquid core, is also modeled in the temperature and solidification model.
In a further preferred embodiment of the invention, the modeling of the reduction in thickness produced by the reduction stand is carried out using at least one of the variables reduction force and degree of reduction.
In a further preferred embodiment of the invention, at least one of the variables reduction force and degree of reduction is measured in the reduction stand and, is used to adapt the temperature and solidification model.
Further advantages and details of the present invention are described below with reference to the drawings in which:
Reference numerals 9, 10 and 11 denote reduction stands assigned to the cooling device 5. In a preferred embodiment of the invention these stands are connected in terms of data technology to the programmable-memory control unit 7. The rolling force and the degree of reduction, for example in the form of the roll nip, is transmitted to the automation unit 7.
It is preferred for the reduction stand 9 to be arranged inside the cooling section, i.e. cooling devices 5 are provided upstream and downstream of the reduction stand 9. Furthermore, it is preferable for the cooling devices to be provided downstream of the second reduction stand 10. The cooling device 9 is preferably not arranged over the bending of the strand 1, as indicated in
The temperature and solidification model 13 can be implemented both as a one-dimensional model and as a two-dimensional model. The heat conduction equation:
which for the temperature and solidification model 13 is used in difference form, i.e. in the form
forms the basis for the temperature and solidification model, in this case shown as two-dimensional. In these equations, T is the temperature, t is the time and a is the thermal conductivity. The two-dimensional spatial coordinates are x and y.
The cross section of the strand skin is divided into small rectangles Δx by Δy, and the temperature is calculated in small time steps Δt. The starting point used for the temperature distribution is based on the assumption that the temperature on entry into the mould (in all rectangles) is the same as the tundish temperature of the steel.
The heat flux Q which is to be dissipated at the surface of the strand is calculated from the surface temperature To of the strand, the ambient temperature Tu, the surface area A and the heat transfer coefficient α, where Q=α(Tu−To) A. For cooling in the mould, a is assumed to be constant and tu is deemed to be equal to the temperature of the cooling water in the mould. For cooling by the cooling devices 5, TU is assumed to be the same as the temperature of the coolant and a is calculated, for example, as:
where V is the coolant volume in
can be given differently for any point on the strand surface, with the result that the model can also be used to describe nozzle characteristics.
The model also calculates the profile of the solidification boundary from the profile of the temperature distribution in the strand.
The individual modeling parameters (variables) include:
The temperature and material dependency of λ, c, enthalpy and ρ is taken into account in the model.
αa=do*α.
For this purpose, the solidification boundaries ei in the strand are determined from given cooling of the strand by means of the temperature and solidification model 13. In a comparison unit 17, this solidification boundary ei is compared with the roll strokes ΔWj,y,u (lower) and ΔWj,y,o (upper), which occur in the reduction stands and the rolling forces Fj,u (lower) and Fj,o (upper) in the reduction stands. If the values of the roll strokes which are typical for a change in geometry are undershot and/or the values of the rolling forces which are typical for a change in geometry are exceeded, the function block 16 determines a new proposal for an improved adaptation factor di. As a result, the solidification boundary is shifted until the corresponding limit values are exceeded or undershot, respectively. The starting value used for the iteration is a value do=1. The end of the iteration is set by the function block 18 do=di. The heat transfer coefficient α in equation 3 is replaced by the adapted heat transfer coefficient αa.
It is preferred if a pilot control is provided for the cooling device, in which case the transmission dependency of known times of the changes of installation values, such as the casting rate and/or the strand material, takes place.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
199 31 331 | Jul 1999 | DE | national |
This application is a 371 of PCT/DE00/02117 filed on Jun. 29, 2000.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCTDE00/02117 | 6/29/2000 | WO | 00 | 8/27/2002 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO0103867 | 1/18/2001 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5488987 | Di Giusto et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5734329 | Khosrowpour et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5974056 | Wilson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5988259 | Welker et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2444443 | Mar 1975 | DE |
3818077 | May 1988 | DE |
4417808 | May 1994 | DE |
19508476 | Mar 1995 | DE |
19612420 | Mar 1996 | DE |