The present invention is directed to the field of golf balls and more particularly to a method and device for marking golf balls.
A golfer must consider many variables when facing a putt. These variables including the slope(s) of the green, the type, cut, dampness and grain of the grass, the distance of the putt, and the weather (i.e. wind, rain, etc.). Data on many of these variables are available to the observant golfer. An analysis of all variables leads to a simultaneous decision as to how hard (the “speed”) and in what direction (the “line”) to strike the ball. It would seem that “all” that remains is for the golfer to step up to the ball and putt it along his intended line at his intended speed.
However, at least two residual problems plague the golfer. The first is an expected problem—he must not lose sight of his line as he steps up to execute the putt. The second is unexpected—the golfer in choosing the parameters of his putt typically assumes that, because his ball is spherical, the mass of the ball within the sphere will be completely balanced around the center point of the sphere. Thus, if he strikes the ball on the correct line at the correct speed the ball will travel on its intended course. While this is a reasonable assumption, it is generally not an accurate one. In particular, while most balls are virtually spherical (and those that are not can usually be weeded out by sight, or by mechanical means, e.g. dropping the ball through a ring repeatedly using different orientations for the ball), the center of mass cannot be immediately determined by sight and need not be located at the center of the sphere. This is problematic as it means that a perfectly executed putt may not travel along its intended path. Minor deviations mean missed putts.
Various devices exist to help the golfer with the first problem. These devices place one or more lines on golf balls to aid the golfer in aiming his ball once the intended speed and line have been determined. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,004,223 to Newcomb discloses a device that allows a golfer to draw a cross on a ball; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,564,707 to Dinh discloses a stencil consisting of various parallel and perpendicular lines that when placed on a ball is designed to aid alignment, the teachings of both of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Other devices attempt to deal with the second problem. These devices locate and mark the dynamic axis of a golf ball. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,546,644 to Beny, the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference, discloses a device wherein: “[T]he dynamic axis of a sphere, e.g. golf ball, is located by spinning the sphere at high speed while it is supported on a low friction-bearing surface, thus allowing the desired stable axis to align itself with the spin axis. Markings indicative of the location of the stable axis are applied to the sphere.” In particular, proper use of Beny's device results in a line being drawn around the equator of the golf ball. U.S. Pat. No. 4,111,038 to Olson et al., the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference, discloses a kit and a method for marking golf balls (with a pen forming a mark) wherein “the axis of the golf ball including the mark, should always be placed perpendicular to the plane of the striking surface.” Finally, U.S. Design Pat. No. Des. 323,301 to Cheng discloses a rotating axis marking unit for golf balls.
Despite these devices and methods for marking golf balls and determining dynamic axes, significant problems remain. Most golf balls come with markings placed on them by the manufacturer (e.g. the name of the manufacture, the type of ball, and an identification number), which are not intended to indicate a putting line or a dynamic axis. The addition of aiming lines can make the ball appear busy and make it difficult to successfully utilize the aiming lines. Interestingly, Dinh attempts to deal with this problem by incorporating into his stencil parts of the manufacturers markings. But since the manufacturer's markings do not account for the dynamic axis of the ball, clearly Dinh stencil will not be oriented optimally. The prior art devices find the dynamic axis by spinning the ball and marking the ball as it spins, thereby generating a circumferential line around the ball. Partial lines or markings other than lines (e.g. text) are not possible.
Many of the prior art devices and methods utilize non-permanent marking techniques, and all require significant work on the part of golfer.
Dave Pelz has addressed the problem of locating and marking the dynamic axis of a golf ball in his book Dave Pelz's Putting Bible (New York: Doubleday, 2000, pp. 203-212). Pelz suggests the use of a device (which he markets) to spin a golf ball and then hand marking a line along the equator. Pelz's device has a number of problems, including: (1) it can handle only one ball at a time; each ball must be spun and marked individually; (2) the special marker for hand marking the golf ball can be easily misaligned by the user during the process of marking, resulting in an incorrectly drawn equator; (3) the ink used for the device is temporary and rubs off onto the club head at impact; (4) the device only provides for an equator; it is not possible to draw any other configuration; (5) the Pelz equator line must be placed in addition to any markings already on the ball; and (6) no matter how careful one is, it is difficult to avoid knocking the ball out of alignment while marking the ball.
There remains a need for an effective method and device for marking golf balls for improved putting.
The present invention provides a method and device for marking golf balls that allows for the placement of a putting directional indicator (PDI) along the dynamic axis of a ball. While golfers could use the device to mark individual balls after they have been purchased (i.e. after they already have marks on them from the manufacturer), in preferred embodiments, the PDI is applied at the manufacturing stage and/or before the ball has other markings placed upon it. While the PDI could simply consist of one or more lines, in a preferred embodiment, the putting directional indicator may serve as an identifying mark for a manufacturer, distributor or consumer and may be designed to incorporate letters, words, symbols, short sentences, names, initials, numbers, images and photographs.
In one aspect, the invention provides for a spinning and braking device to align a PDI with the dynamic axis of the ball. The ball is spun at a sufficient speed for a sufficient time period to locate its dynamic axis, and a braking mechanism is then employed to retain the ball in a position such that the orientation of its dynamic axis is maintained. Once the ball is at rest, any design for a PDI can be applied. Alternatively, in another aspect, the invention provides for a temporary marking device that marks the spinning ball with a temporary mark. The temporary mark is then used to orient the ball for proper application of the PDI.
The invention is described with reference to the several figures of the drawing, in which:
Referring now to the figures of the drawing, the figures constitute a part of this specification and illustrate exemplary embodiments of the invention. It is to be understood that in some instances various aspects of the invention may be shown exaggerated or enlarged to facilitate an understanding of the invention.
The PDI marking device 20 and braking mechanism 16 have been shown in
In an alternative embodiment, instead of rapidly braking the spinning motion of the golf ball and holding it in position to be permanently marked with a PDI, a temporary mark is used. A golf ball for which a dynamic axis has been identified can be marked by a temporary marking device as the golf ball is spinning. The rotation of the ball is stopped without the concern of maintaining the orientation of the dynamic axis and then the ball is permanently marked with a PDI where the placement of the PDI by the PDI marking device is guided by the temporary mark. The applied temporary mark and method of orienting the PDI may be accomplished using a variety of methods. In one embodiment, the temporary mark may be one that is capable of being optically recognized by a orientation device, such as a bar code for example. The temporary mark acts as a guide for orienting the PDI marking device. In one embodiment, the orientation device may have a component that recognizes the temporary mark and a component that incrementally rotates the ball into a position suitable for marking by the PDI marking device. For example, a temporary mark may be applied that is recognizable by a laser orientation device, such as transparent ink or a visible bar code optically recognizable by a laser. The laser may be incorporated as part of the PDI marking device or could be a separate stand-alone orientation device. In an alternative embodiment, the same device that recognizes the temporary mark could apply the PDI, for example the same laser system could optically recognize the temporary mark and apply the PDI.
In another embodiment, the applied temporary mark 32 may have magnetic properties that would be magnetically recognized by the PDI marking device 20 or orientation device 40 for purposes of orienting the PDI 22. If the temporary mark 32 is visually transparent it will not be necessary to separately remove it. However, if the temporary mark 32 is visible, then the mark will preferably be removed at some point during or after the PDI marking process. In a preferred embodiment, the temporary mark is applied by spraying the temporary marking material, for example magnetic ink, onto the ball. By applying the temporary mark in this manner, the chance of knocking the ball out of alignment while marking the ball is reduced. In an alternative embodiment, the temporary mark may be applied by physical contact of the temporary marking device and ball.
In a preferred embodiment, the assembly-line system incorporates the concept of the dynamic axis locating device 14, temporary marking device 30, orientation device 40, and PDI marking device 20 as separate, non-integral devices performing successive operations on a flow of golf balls 10 (see FIGS. 6A-6C). The steady-state operation of this system comprises a continuous stream of balls 10 as “works in process” flowing through each stage of the assembly-line system and resulting in a finished ball having the PDI 22 marked along its dynamic axis. The assembly-line system may incorporate the use of ramps, chutes, conveyor-belts and other mechanisms for delivering balls between each marking stage. The assembly-line system may be automatically operated based on allocating a certain amount of time for each marking stage before advancing each “work in process” ball onward to the next stage.
Although a preferred embodiment for the PDI is for use in putting, the PDI could be used to indicate the desired direction in any golf shot where the golfer is allowed to align the golf ball—i.e. on the Tee or any time on the green where the golfer is allowed to place the ball. Such ball alignment would have two benefits. First, it would facilitate club and body alignment of the golfer, thus increasing the likelihood of a shot going to its intended target. Second, by having the ball aligned along its optimal equator, a more true hit (i.e. less unexpected spin) can be achieved.
Other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from a consideration of the specification or practice of the invention disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with the true scope and spirit of the invention being indicated by the following claims.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/154,048, filed May 23, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,742,449, dated Jun. 1, 2004, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Ser. No. 60/298,744, filed Jun. 15, 2001, now abandoned, the teachings of all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2898764 | Kinsey et al. | Aug 1959 | A |
4111038 | Olson et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4467649 | Mueller | Aug 1984 | A |
4480471 | Kögler et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4546644 | Beny et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4546975 | Nims | Oct 1985 | A |
4860578 | Movick | Aug 1989 | A |
4974511 | Hsi-Chou | Dec 1990 | A |
D323301 | Cheng | Jan 1992 | S |
5248878 | Ihara | Sep 1993 | A |
5450791 | Prohm | Sep 1995 | A |
5564707 | Dinh | Oct 1996 | A |
5632205 | Gordon et al. | May 1997 | A |
5651741 | Masutani et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5832819 | Widman | Nov 1998 | A |
5878659 | Hatter | Mar 1999 | A |
5878670 | Yamaguchi | Mar 1999 | A |
5968605 | Lutz | Oct 1999 | A |
6004223 | Newcomb | Dec 1999 | A |
6012269 | Vitti | Jan 2000 | A |
6013330 | Lutz | Jan 2000 | A |
6213012 | Arms | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6216587 | Foley | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6231459 | Pettigrew et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
20030213289 | Burnett | Nov 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040173109 A1 | Sep 2004 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60298744 | Jun 2001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10154048 | May 2002 | US |
Child | 10800920 | US |