Patent Grant
7090140
The present invention relates to a method and a device for monitoring burners according to the precharacterizing clause of the independent claims 1 and 7 and also a test method for testing the method and/or the device according to claim 15.
Methods and devices for monitoring burners with automatic burner controls for controlling or regulating the burner are already known, which are used in heating systems of all types, for example in oil- and gas-fired systems for heating buildings. These methods and devices usually use regulators for regulating the automatic burner controls and temperature monitors for monitoring maximum temperatures in the heating system, such as for example the boiler or the flow temperature, in order to detect unsafe operating states, such as for example the overheating of the boiler.
For monitoring thermal sources or boilers in terms of safety, there is already sensor technology, such as for example boiler sensors, flow sensors or return sensors, which detects the temperature of the heating water in the boiler in the flow pipe or in the return pipe. Moreover, known methods and devices for monitoring burners have further, mostly mechanical, limiting devices which detect a maximum temperature and, if it is exceeded, switch off the burner and lock it. In this case, either the heating engineer or the operator of the heating system must ascertain why this operating state was reached, i.e. detect the error, in order to release the locking and enable the burner to be switched on again.
It is furthermore known with regulating devices, in particular for cost reasons, to replace mechanical components with electronic components and to equip the electronic components with multiple functions and corresponding algorithms.
The known state of the art has the disadvantage that the previously known devices and methods for monitoring burners have safety devices which switch off and lock the burner in the case of unsafe operating states, such as for example the reaching or exceeding of a maximum temperature, without distinctions being able to be made between different cases. For example, there are operating states which are similar or correspond to such an unsafe operating state without safety being an issue. For example, so-called reheatings occur after a burner has been switched off in the case of thermal sources and/or boilers which contain a small amount of water and which in this case, if the maximum temperature is exceeded, would not necessarily need to be locked. Furthermore, with the known devices and methods, the dynamic behaviour of the boiler and/or the thermal source cannot be monitored in connection with the already existing sensors for measuring different temperatures or operating states. Neither is a preventative monitoring of the burner possible, as only predefined and fixed operating states are monitored, not however the behaviour of the burner before or after these operating states.
The object of the invention is therefore to improve the known methods and devices for monitoring burners such that a dynamic monitoring of burners is made possible which detects the operating states before or after an unsafe operating state is reached. It is also the object of the present invention to provide a test method for testing such a method or such a device.
The invention achieves the object on which it is based by means of the characterizing features of the independent claims 1 and 7 and also by means of claim 15.
Advantageous variants and designs of the invention are characterized and described in the dependent claims.
The method according to the invention for monitoring burners has an automatic burner control for controlling and/or regulating the burner and optionally a regulator for regulating the automatic burner control and also a temperature monitor, at least the flow/boiler temperature being detected and compared by means of the temperature monitor with a predefinable first maximum flow/boiler temperature and the burner being switched off if the flow/boiler temperature reaches or exceeds the predefinable first maximum flow/boiler temperature.
For monitoring the burner according to the invention, the temperature monitor is tested and/or monitored as follows: The flow/boiler temperature is compared with a predefinable second maximum flow/boiler temperature, the predefinable second maximum flow/boiler temperature being higher than the predefinable first maximum flow/boiler temperature, and the burner is then switched off and locked if the flow/boiler temperature reaches or exceeds the predefinable second maximum flow/boiler temperature and also an error signal of the temperature monitor was produced.
There is thus no locking of the burner if the flow/boiler temperature reaches the predefinable second maximum flow/boiler temperature, i.e. a presettable safety temperature, rather there must be an additional error signal which depends as follows on the specific operating states of the burner. It is to be taken into account that both the flow and the boiler temperature can be used to monitor the unsafe operating state “Overheating of the boiler and/or the thermal source”. The method according to the invention thus uses the already-existing sensor technology with the known heating systems and thus replaces the previously customary mechanical safety temperature limiters which mostly monitored the temperature in the flow or in the boiler with a special sensor.
The error signal of the temperature monitor is produced if the flow/boiler temperature reaches or exceeds the predefinable first maximum flow/boiler temperature and a status signal of the temperature monitor signals no switching-off of the burner or there is no status signal of the temperature monitor. In this case the temperature monitor has failed, i.e. the burner was not switched off although the first maximum flow/boiler temperature was reached or exceeded.
The error signal of the temperature monitor is also produced if the flow/boiler temperature reaches or exceeds the predefinable first maximum flow/boiler temperature and a burner valve signal signals an open burner valve or there is no burner valve signal. In this case, the first maximum flow/boiler temperature has been exceeded without the fuel supply to the burner being interrupted. In this case also, the error signal is produced which leads to the switching-off and locking of the burner.
According to the present invention, the burner is therefore not locked if, although the second maximum flow/boiler temperature is exceeded, the temperature monitor “reports” a normal switching-off of the burner. This normal switching-off of the burner occurs if the first maximum flow/boiler temperature was reached or exceeded and the temperature monitor reports a status signal which confirms the sending of an “OFF” signal to the automatic burner control and if a burner valve signal signals the closure or the closed state of the fuel valve.
Such a reaching of the second maximum flow/boiler temperature with switched-off burner is called reheating. This reheating is initially not a critical operating state as it is not caused by any error in regulation but by unfavourable operating conditions or operating states. In order to establish whether this reheating occurs repeatedly during the day in the burner, according to an advantageous variant of the present invention, a special counter for the reheating has its reading raised if the second maximum flow/boiler temperature is reached by a reheating. In this case, the error signal of the temperature monitor is produced if the flow/boiler temperature reaches or exceeds the predefinable second maximum flow/boiler temperature more than a predefinable number of times without a locking of the burner having taken place. If the reheating thus occurs for example more than ten times a day, an error does seem to exist (for example the pump is not running correctly) and consequently, if this counter limit is exceeded, the automatic burner control and/or the burner must be locked and a corresponding error code displayed.
Similarly the error signal of the temperature monitor is however not produced if the flow/boiler temperature does not reach or exceed the predefinable second maximum flow/boiler temperature the predefined number of times within a predefinable period of time, without a locking of the burner having taken place. If therefore this maximum limit of the counter (for example ten times a day) is not exceeded, the counter is reset to zero every 24 hours. Advantageously this maximum number can be predefined, i.e. set on the device according to the invention.
Naturally the burner is then switched off and locked in any case according to an advantageous variant of the present invention if the flow/boiler temperature reaches or exceeds the predefinable second maximum flow/boiler temperature and the error signal of the temperature monitor was blocked or is not present. In this case the device according to the invention operates like a mechanical temperature limiter.
The device according to the invention has or advantageously uses a temperature sensor to detect the flow temperature or the boiler temperature of a heating system, whilst the temperature monitor compares this measured temperature with the predefinable first maximum flow/boiler temperature and switches the burner off if this is reached or exceeded.
According to the present invention, a temperature limiter, in particular an electronic safety temperature limiter, compares the flow/boiler temperature with the predefinable second maximum flow/boiler temperature, which is higher than the predefinable first maximum flow/boiler temperature, and sends a switch-off signal to switch off and lock the burner on the automatic burner control if the flow/boiler temperature reaches or exceeds the predefinable second maximum flow/boiler temperature and the temperature limiter also receives an error signal.
As already described above, the temperature limiter receives an error signal if the flow/boiler temperature reaches or exceeds the predefinable first maximum flow/boiler temperature and the temperature monitor sends a status signal to the temperature limiter which signals no switching-off of the burner and/or the temperature limiter detects an open burner valve by means of a burner valve signal. The temperature limiter itself generates an error signal if it receives no burner valve signal or no status signal of the temperature monitor and/or if the temperature limiter has none of these signals, because the temperature limiter must then assume that either the signal transmission path or the signal transmitter itself is defective. In this case also, the temperature limiter then has the function of the mechanical safety temperature limiter which, if the second maximum flow/boiler temperature is exceeded, switches off and locks the burner.
Advantageously the temperature limiter has a counter which counts the number of times the predefinable second maximum flow/boiler temperature is reached or exceeded without a locking of the burner having taken place. The temperature limiter receives or generates no error signal if the counter does not reach or exceed a predefinable number within a predefinable period of time.
An advantageous version of the method according to the invention and/or the device according to the invention is explained in more detail using the drawings. There are shown in:
The temperature limiter 2 is advantageously an electronic temperature limiter which checks the flow temperature (or boiler temperature), a return temperature TRL, a flow/boiler temperature reference value TVLsoll, a status signal 9 of the temperature monitor 5 and optionally the burner valve signal 10 for plausibility using plausibility criteria, and provides the regulator 4 and/or the temperature monitor 5 with a checked flow/boiler temperature TVL2.
The temperature limiter 2 sends the switch-off signal 8 to switch off and lock the burner 15 to the automatic burner control 1 if one or more of the plausibility criteria has not been fulfilled. After the burner 15 has been switched off, this is then locked against an automatic restart if the plausibility check delivered a corresponding result.
As a result of the method according to the invention or as a result of the device according to the invention, a safe and reliable operation of the burner 15 is achieved without it being unnecessarily switched off and locked. On the other hand, the burner 15 is however safely switched off and locked in the case of critical operating and danger states. The temperature limiter 2 thus monitors not only the individual temperature sensors 3 for short-circuit interruption or plausibility (for example an unnaturally high difference between flow and return temperature), but also the electronic temperature monitor 5. The monitoring of the individual sensors 3 ensures that the regulator 4 and the temperature monitor 5 are always supplied with reliable readings.
An advantageous test method for testing the method according to the invention and/or the device according to the invention for monitoring burners is carried out by successive switching-off of various functions of the temperature limiter 2 such that each individual function can be tested separately.
Each function of the temperature limiter 2 can thus be checked for plausibility using plausibility criteria by blocking or switching off the other functions separately and for example by introducing corresponding values of the flow/boiler temperature TVL, the return temperature TRL, the flow/boiler temperature reference value TVLsoll, the status signal 9, the temperature monitor 5 and/or the burner valve signal 10.
By blocking all functions of the temperature limiter 2, i.e. if neither the temperature sensors 3 nor the regulator 4 nor the temperature monitor 5 is checked, the switch-off signal 8 to switch off and lock the burner 15 is then sent to the automatic burner control 1 if the predefinable second maximum flow/boiler temperature TVLmax2 is reached or exceeded. Using a blocking of all functions of the temperature limiter 2, the switching limit, i.e. the exceeding of the predefinable second maximum flow/boiler temperature TVLmax2 can thus be checked.
Thus the temperature limiter 2 can also be tested in respect of its functions if corresponding functions are provided which already switch off the burner 15 before the predefinable second maximum flow/boiler temperature is reached.
A bit pattern is advantageously defined for switching off and releasing of individual functions or function parts of the temperature limiter 2. By setting “0” and “1”, individual functions can be activated or blocked. An example of such a bit pattern is represented in the following table:
The switching-off of the burner 15 if the predefinable second maximum flow/boiler temperature TVLmax2 is reached cannot be blocked using the table given above and is thus always active. If thus all functions of the table given above are blocked, the burner 15 is locked if the predefinable second maximum flow/boiler temperature is exceeded.
With the present invention, a dynamic monitoring of the behaviour of boilers 16 or thermal sources in connection with the various sensors 3 is thus possible so that the operation of the burner 15 can be subjected to better anticipatory control and optionally also switched off earlier.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 101 14 823 | Mar 2001 | DE | national |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/IB02/00788 | 3/14/2002 | WO | 00 | 2/12/2004 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO02/077529 | 10/3/2002 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4470541 | Raleigh | Sep 1984 | A |
| 4951870 | Ballard et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 6059195 | Adams et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6129284 | Adams et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 19542088 | Apr 1973 | DE |
| 3923773 | Mar 1990 | DE |
| 0825385 | Feb 1998 | EP |
| 06-288538 | Oct 1994 | JP |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20040112970 A1 | Jun 2004 | US |
